Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
in the ongoing regeneration and subcultural differentiation of youth languages, the principles of reflection and counterreflection apply to the sociocultural
contexts of youth language, in particular its relations
to standard language.
A characteristic of such texts is the transfer of primarily oral characteristics to the written language. These
include the use of expressive idioms, the explicit naming or direct address of interlocutors, and introductory discourse particles. Another popular technique
is graphic representation of sound variation by means
of vowel or consonant doubling or the use of spoken
acronyms, which Androutsopoulos (1998) called
graphemic marking. The fictional orality which this
induces creates an informal, personal atmosphere between writer and reader. Particularly in informal
e-media communication, the tendency towards graphic representation of orality is so pronounced that a
strict differentiation of spoken from written linguistic
features can no longer be consistently maintained.
Distinctive Features of Oral Youth Language
Summary
No single perspective can adequately describe youth
languages and their functions in all their heterogeneity, for these languages are not only a contemporary
but also a historical phenomenon, and their impact
on their respective standard languages requires diachronic treatment. Youth languages are not confined
to certain linguistic systems; they are an international
phenomenon existing in many different languages
(Androutsopoulos and Scholz, 1998), and as such
they can be analyzed contrastively. Their use is always
linked to the intention of the speaker and has distinctive functions, among them the formation of individual and group identities. In this respect they must
also be viewed as developmental as well as group
phenomena. And in a world where youth culture
and subcultures increasingly depend on the media
and its commercializing tendencies, youth languages
are ultimately also a media phenomenon.
Outlook
Against the background of a globalized world, where
the spread of youth languages is supported by the
Bibliography
Androutsopoulos J K (1998). Deutsche Jugendsprache:
Untersuchungen zu ihren Strukturen und Funktionen.
Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Androutsopoulos J K (2003). Jugendliche Schreibstile in
der Netzkommunikation: zwei Ga stebu cher im Vergleich. In Neuland (ed.). (b), 307321.
Androutsopoulos J K & Georgakopoulou A (eds.) (2003).
Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam/
Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Androutsopoulos J K & Scholz A (eds.) (1998).
Jugendsprache Langue des jeunes Youth language:
linguistische und soziolinguistische Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Augenstein S (1998). Funktionen von Jugendsprache:
Studien zu verschiedenen Gespra chstypen des Dialogs
Jugendlicher mit Erwachsenen. Tu bingen: Max
Niemeyer.
Bachofer W (2003). Charakteristika der deutschen
Jugendsprache(n) Charakteristika der gesprochenen
deutschen Umgangssprache. In Neuland (ed.). (b),
6175.
Berruto G (1987). Varietat. In Ammon U, Dittmar N &
Mattheier K J (eds.) Soziolinguistik: ein internationales