Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lisa Company is the exclusive distributor for an automative product. The product sells for Tk. 40 per unit and has a CM
ratio 30%. The company's fixed expenses are Tk. 180,000 per year.
Required:
i) What is the variable expenses per unit?
ii) Using the equation method:
1) What is the break-even point in units and sales taka?
2) What sales level in units and in sales taka is required to earn an annual profit of Tk. 60,000?
3) Assume that by using a more efficient shipper, the company is able to reduce its variable expenses by Tk. 4 per unit.
What is the Company's new break-even point in units and sales taka?
iii) Repeat (ii) using the unit contribution method.
Solution
Answer (i)
We Know,
CM Ratio = Contribution / Sales
=> CM Ratio = (Selling Price - VC per Unit) / Selling Price
=> 0.30 = (40 - VC) / 40
=> 12 = 40 - VC
=> VC = 40 - 12
=> VC= 28 per Unit
Answer (ii) : Equation Method
1) BEP in Units and Taka
-----------------------------We have,
p = 40, v = 28 and FC = 180,000
40x = 28x + 180,000
=> 40x 28x = 180,000
=> 12x = 180,000
So, Break-even in Units = x = 15,000 units
Break-even Point in Sales Taka = 40 15,000 = 600,000 Taka.
2) Targeted Sales in Units and Taka
------------------------------------------If Targeted Profit, P= Tk. 60,000,
We have,
40x = 28x + 180,000 + 60,000
=> 40x 28x = 240,000
=> 12x = 240,000
So, Break-even in Units = x = 20,000 units
Break-even Point in Sales Taka = 40 20,000 = 800,000 Taka.
3) BEP in Units and Taka (If VC changes)
-----------------------------------------------If VC reduces by Tk. 4,
We have,
p = 40, v = 28-4 = 24 and FC = 180,000
40x = 24x + 180,000
=> 40x 24x = 180,000
=> 16x = 180,000
So, Break-even in Units = x = 11,250 units
Break-even Point in Sales Taka = 40 11,250 = 450,000 Taka.
Note:
Purchase of Raw Materials = Purchase + Freight In - Purchase Return - Purchase Discount = =400000+120003200-20000 = 388800
Manufacturing Overhead = Factory Depreciation + Factory Insurance + Other Factory Expenses =
160000+50000+16000 = 226000
Sales revenue
Less: Cost of goods sold
Direct material, opening inventory
Purchase
Direct material, closing inventory
Direct material consumed
Freight in
Direct manufacturing labour cost
Prime cost
Factory overhead
Total manufacturing cost
WIP, opening inventory
WIP, closing inventory
Cost of goods manufactured
FG, opening inventory
Cost of goods available for sale
FG, closing inventory
Cost of goods sold
Unit cost
200,000
675,000
(160,000)
715,000
1,000
240,000
956,000
191,200
1,147,200
1,147,200
210,000
1,357,200
(321,216)
Gross profit
Less: Administrative expenses
Selling expenses
Net profit
458.88
458.88
(1,035,984)
493.33
1,484,016
(6,000)
(12,000)
1,466,016
706.67
698.10
40 - (40 30%)
= 28
= 15,000 units
= Tk. 600,000
= 20,000 units
= Tk. 800,000
= 11,250 units
= Tk. 450,000
Mar
Total
16,000
30,000
46,000
24,000
18,000
42,000
27,000
22,000
49,000
67,000
70,000
137,000
14,000
3,500
3,000
20,500
33,000
3,000
36,000
36,000
3,000
39,000
83,000
3,500
9,000
95,500
25,500
7,500
33,000
6,000
33,000
39,000
10,000
39,000
49,000
41,500
7,500
49,000
(500,000)
Annual
Depreciation
-
100,000
90,000
150,000
90,000
60,000
21,000
129,000
(274,500)
0.756
97,524
200,000
90,000
110,000
38,500
161,500
(113,000)
0.658
106,267
225,000
90,000
135,000
47,250
177,750
64,750
0.572
101,673
350,000
90,000
260,000
91,000
259,000
323,750
0.497
128,723
18,142
Year
CFBT
Payback period =
NPV =
Profitability index =
Profit
before tax
-
Cash flow
after tax
(500,000)
Cumulative
Cash flow
(500,000)
Discount
factor
1.000
Present
Value
(500,000)
10,000
3,500
96,500
(403,500)
0.870
83,955
Tax @ 35%
BDT 18,142
96,500 + 129,000 + 161,500 + 177,750 + 259,000
500,000
= 1.04
Comment: The invested money is expected to be returned within 3 years 7 months 19 days and the project has a positive
NPV for the entire life which results in PI more than 1. So, the project can be taken up.
140,000
(1,386)
138,614
30,000
168,614
5,000
10,000
16,000
8,000
24,000
207,614
207,614
207,614
(20,970)
186,644
436,800
(186,644)
250,156
(162,850)
(50,000)
37,306
167,614
100,000
1.68
20,970
12511
87,489
436,800
5
1386
Taka
Taka
97000
(180000)
17000
(163000)
December-2013, 8(c)
Leasing vs Borrowing (Buying)
PV of Cash Outflows under Leasing Alternative:
Year-end
Lease
Payments
220,000
1-4
220,000
Tax Benefit
@50%
PV
Factor
@7%
Cash
Outflows
PV of Cash outflow
220,000
1.0000
220,000
110,000
110,000
3.3872
372,593
110,000
-110,000
0.7130
-78,428
514,165
Year-end
Depreciation
Yearend
Beginning
Balance
255,513
1,000,000
255,513
744,487
255,513
255,513
255,513
Interest
Principal
Ending
Balance
255,513
744,487
104,228
151,284
593,203
593,203
83,048
172,464
420,739
420,739
58,903
196,609
224,129
224,129
31,378
224,135
-5
Loan
Instalment
Interest
@14%
255,513
255,513
104,228
255,513
255,513
255,513
Depr
Tax
Deductable
Expenses
Tax Benefit
@50%
Net Cash
outflow
PV
Factor
@7%
PV of Cash
outflow
255,513
1.0000
255,513
200,000
304,228
152,114
103,399
0.9346
96,634
83,048
200,000
283,048
141,524
113,988
0.8734
99,562
58,903
200,000
258,903
129,452
126,061
0.8163
102,903
31,378
200,000
231,378
115,689
139,824
0.7629
106,671
200,000
200,000
100,000
-100,000
0.7130
-71,299
589,984
The company is advised to go for leasing as PV of cashflows under leasing alternative (514,165) is lower than that under
buying alternative (589,984).