Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
All contracts are agreements but all agreements need not be contracts. The
agreements that create legal obligations only are contracts. The validity of an
enforceable agreement depends upon whether the agreement satisfies the essential
requirements laid down in the Act. Section 10 lays down that 'all the agreements are
contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract
for a lawful object and are not hereby expressly declared to be void'.
b) Free consent: The parties should agree upon the same thing in the same
sense and their consent should be free from all sorts of pressure. 1n other words
it should not be caused by coercion, undue influence, misrepresentation, fraud or
mistake.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
f) Not expressly declared void: The statute should not declare an agreement
void. The Act itself has declared certain types of agreements as void. E.g.,
agreements in restraint of marriage, trade, legal proceedings. 1n such cases, the
aggrieved party can't seek any relief from the court of law.
h) Certainty of terms: The terms of the agreement should be certain. E.g., Mr. A.
agrees to sell 100 tons of oil. The agreement is vague as it does not mention the
types of oil agreed to be sold.
i) Intention to create legal obligation: Though Sec. 10 is silent about this, under
English law this happens to be an important ingredient. Therefore, 1ndian courts
also recognize this ingredient. An agreement creating social obligation can't be
enforced.
j) Legal formalities: 1ndian Contract Act deals with a simple contract supported by
consideration. Agreements made in 1ndia may be oral or written. However, Sec.
10 states that where the statute states that the contract should be in writing and
should be witnessed or should be registered, the same must be observed.
Otherwise, the agreement can't be enforced e.g., Under 1ndian Companies Act,
the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association must be registered.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
Question 2: 'Not all persons have the capacity to enter into a contract.' Discuss
this statement.
Answer :
Legal disability of the parties would render the agreement entered into between them
unenforceable in a court of law. 1n fact, even a desirable person may enter into an
agreement. Law does not infringe his freedom of making an agreement with anybody
he likes. But by declaring certain classes of persons having no contractual capacity,
law seeks to protect their interests from being exploited by unscrupulous persons.
Definition:
Section 11 lays down that "Every person is competent to contract who is of the age
of majority according to the law to which he is subject and who is of sound mind and
is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject." This section
declares following persons to be incompetent: (1) Minors (2) persons of unsound
mind and (3) persons disqualified by law to which they are subject.
Minors: A minor is a person who has not attained the age of majority. According to
1ndian Majority Act, 1875 the age of 18 years is a major. However, if a guardian is
appointed by the court or if the minor or his property is under the supervision of a
court of wards, the age of majority is 21 years.
Principles governing minor's contracts: The law protects minor's persons,
preserves either their rights or estates, excuses their shortcomings and negligences
and assists them in their pleadings, the judges are their counsellors, the jury are their
servants and law is their guardian.
1n pursuing the above objective, the law should not cause unnecessary hardship to
those who deal with minors.
Sec. 11 of the Act is silent as regards the legal effects of an agreement entered into
by or with a minor. 1n Mohari Bibi Vs. Dharmo Das Ghosh case it was held that a
minor's agreement is void-ab-initio.
Effects of minor's agreement: A minor's agreement is void-ab-initio. Where there is
no contract, there should be no contractual obligation on either side. Hence, the
effects of a minor's agreements are worked out independently of any contract.
1. No estoppel against minor: A minor who has made an agreement by
misrepresentation of his age may disclose his real age. There is no estoppel against
him.
2. No liability in contract or tort arising out of contract: A minor is, in law,
incapable of giving consent. Hence, there could be no change in the character or
status of the parties. A minor who misrepresents his age to obtain a contract cann't
be sued for deceit. 'You cann't convert a contract into a tort to enable you to sue an
infant.' This principle has been followed in 1ndia. Where, however, the tort is
independent of contract the mere fact that a contract is also involved will not absolve
the minor from liability.
3. Doctrine of restitution: 1f a minor obtains property or goods by
misrepresentating his age, he can be compelled to restore it but only so long as the
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
Breach of contract may be of two kinds: (1) Anticipatory breach and (2) Actual
breach.
Whenever there is breach of a contract, the injured party becomes entitled to any
one or more of the following remedies against the guilty party:
As regards the last two remedies stated above, the law is regulated by the Specific
Relief Act, 1963.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
1. From: A contract of guarantee is just like any other contract which may be either
oral or in writing.
Consent of the parties: There must be consent of all the three parties.
Example: X took a loan of Rs.10,000 from Y on 1st Jan. 1999 and paid nothing on
account of interest and principal. On 2nd Jan. 2002, Z gave the guarantee to Y for
the payment of Rs.10,000 due from X. This is not a valid contract of guarantee
because the primary liability between X and Y is a time barred debt which is not
enforceable by law.
1 The promise to pay must be conditional: 1n other words, the liability of the
surety should arise only when the principal debtor makes a default.
2 Consideration: Something done for the benefit of the principal debtor is
considered as consideration for the guarantee to make the contract valid. The legal
detriment incurred by the promisee at the promisor's request is sufficient to
constitute the element of consideration.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
3 Competency: The principal debtor, surety and creditor must be a person competent
to contract. However, under certain circumstances, a surety is liable though the
principal debtor is not i.e. the original contract is void as is the case of a contract with
a minor in which the surety is liable not only as surety but also as principal debtor. A
person of unsound mind or an undischarged insolvent cannot give a valid guarantee.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
Kinds of Guarantee
Thus, an endorsement consists of the signature of the holder usually made on the
back of the negotiable instrument with the object of transferring the instrument. 1f no
space is left on the back of the instrument for the purpose of endorsement, further
endorsements are signed on a slip of paper attached to the instrument. Such a slip is
called 'along' and becomes part of the instrument. The person making the
endorsement is called an 'endorser' and the person to whom the instrument is
indorsed is called an 'endorsee.'
1 Blank or general indorsement: 1f the indorser signs his name only and
does not specify the name of the indorsee, the indorsement is said to be in blank.
The effect of a blank indorsement is to convert the order instrument into bearer
instrument which may be transferred merely by delivery.
2 Indorsement in full or special indorsement: 1f the indorser, in addition to
his signature, also adds a direction to pay the amount mentioned in the instrument
to, or to the order of, a specified person, the indorsement is said to be in full.
3 Partial indorsement: Section 56 provides that a negotiable instrument
cannot be indorsed for a part of the amount appearing to be due on the instrument.
1n other words, a partial indorsement which transfers the right to receive only a part
payment of the amount due on the instrument is invalid.
1n the case of a conditional indorsement the liability of the indorser would arise only
upon the happening of the event specified. But the indorsee can sue other prior
parties, e.g., the maker, acceptor etc., if the instrument is not duly met at maturity,
even though the specified event did not happen.
r Atray MBA-III-Sem MB0035
The essentials of valid contract states that" the terms of agreement should be
capable of being performed & must be certain." Taking a person to moon for a
holiday cannot be a valid contract because neither the activity is being capable of
being performed in near future nor it is certain that someone making such kind of
promise will be able to fulfill. We all know that moon missions are multi-billion
projects & all are funded by Government, so someone making such a promise would
only be a fraud. The government laws have also not yet authorized any agency or
person to make such contracts so any agency or person promising a holiday on
moon is unlawful which an essential term of valid Contract is also.