Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 12-4422
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:11-cr-00366-TDS-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Annette
Stoker
pleaded
guilty
pursuant
to
plea
the
reasonableness
of
the
sentence.
Stoker
was
has
not
done
responsive brief.
so.
The
Government
declined
to
file
affirm.
Because Stoker did not move in the district court to
withdraw her guilty plea, we review the plea hearing for plain
error.
2002).
2009).
Our
review
of
the
record
establishes
that
the
(2007).
This
procedural
and
sentence.
Cir.
decide
consideration
substantive
After
calculated
whether
analyzed
requires
of
reasonableness
both
the
of
the
2010).
correctly
review
the
the
determining
the
whether
advisory
court
district
Guidelines
considered
arguments
the
presented
the
by
range,
3553(a)
the
court
we
must
factors,
parties,
and
575-76; United States v. Carter, 564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.
2009).
Once we have determined that the sentence is free of
procedural error, we consider the substantive reasonableness of
the
sentence,
tak[ing]
circumstances.
into
account
the
totality
of
the
presumption
reasonable.
on
appeal
that
the
sentence
is
against
Montes-Pineda,
the
445
3553(a)
F.3d
375,
factors.
379
(4th
United
Cir.
2006)
States
v.
(internal
calculated
and
considered
Guidelines range.
as
advisory
Stokers
amended
18
factors
U.S.C.
3553(a)
within-Guidelines
(2006)
sentence
was
and
warranted
explained
in
light
that
the
of
the
and
our
review
reveals
none.
Accordingly,
we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
sentencing Stoker.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire
record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
appeal.
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED