Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 13-4880
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington.
Robert C. Chambers,
Chief District Judge. (3:11-cr-00043-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Kristopher Aaron Huffman appeals the sentence of ten
months of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of probation.
On
revoke
his
probation,
and
acknowledges
that
the
district
the
parties
sentence.
sentence
an
opportunity
to
argue
is
plainly
unreasonable
for
an
appropriate
because
the
district
court
it
imposed
to
was
comply
sufficient,
with
the
but
not
purposes
greater
of
than
sentencing.
We affirm.
507
revocation
sentences,
(4th
Cir.
1997).
sentences,
to
determine
This
like
if
court
supervised
they
are
review[s]
release
plainly
probation
revocation
unreasonable.
United States v. Moulden, 478 F.3d 652, 656 (4th Cir. 2007).
The first step in this analysis is a determination of whether
the sentence was unreasonable.
Although
district
court
must
consider
the
policy
court
ultimately
has
broad
discretion
to
revoke
its
marks and citation omitted); see also Moulden, 478 F.3d at 65657.
a
revocation
sentence
as
it
must
be
when
imposing
post-
F.3d
544,
omitted).
547
(4th
Cir.
2010)
(internal
quotation
marks
deference
sentences
we
.
afford
.
district
Id.
If
courts
a
when
sentence
imposing
imposed
these
after
court
sentencing
reasonable.
provided
determination,
Thus,
it
an
adequate
and
the
necessarily
explanation
of
its
sentence
is
procedurally
follows
that
[Huffmans]
Id. at 440.
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED