Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
No changes
TEES:
No changes
Hole #2
Your first short hole is a scary shot with trouble all around.
The oak hanging over the right front of the green is not
something we would design today -- its pretty unfair when
it knocks down a shot aimed at the right edge of the green
-- yet its a huge tree and a big part of the holes defense,
so we recommend leaving it until Nature decides otherwise. It could never be replaced. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
No changes
FAIRWAY:
No changes
TREES:
No changes
TEES:
Hole #3
The number one handicap hole on the course, this is
a wonderful par-4 playing down the line of a creek from
tee to green. The fairway, however, is quite narrow and
should be expanded on the right as close as possible
to the creek edge in order to open up more interesting
angles from the tee and into the green. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
No changes
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
TREES:
Hole #4
Number four is a crazy narrow par-5, but it plays
through such a dramatic landform that it seems to work
pretty well. We recommend re-routing the cart path up
the left-side property line of the first half of the hole so
that we can do away with the ledge that is so visible on
the right. We would like to eliminate the left green-side
bunker and restore fairway approach from that side,
while turning the cross-bunker short of the green out
to the right so that it works in echelon with the bunker
at the front right of the green. The green might also be
reduced in size in a reconstruction, as it is abnormally
large for the course. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
New forward tee located over the shoulder of the first hill, hidden visually from
middle and back tees
Create a communal back tee with the
back tee on the new 10th hole
TREES:
No changes
Hole #5
Here is one of the coolest landforms on the course, with
the hole playing up and over a couple of ridges en route
to the green -- perfect terrain for a dramatic short par-4,
yet the hole as it sits fails to create much drama. We
believe it would be possible to clear more to the left and
lower the ridge in the fairway so one could see the flag
on the green from both sets of tees, tempting golfers to
play well to the left, over a new dramatic bunker in the
face of the hill. We would eliminate the two green set-up,
and construct a new green between the current greens.
-Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
TEES:
Hole #6
In order to combine the 9th and 10th into one superlative par-5, there would need to be an opportunity to
construct a new par-3 of high quality at another point
within the course. We believe we can build an excellent
par-3 between the current 5th and 6th and. Not only do
we believe that we can build an excellent par-3 in that location at a yardage -- 145 yards -- that provides needed
variety for the course, but we also believe that shifting
the back and middle tees for the current 6th back to the
valley short of the current 7th green yields a better and
more interesting hole. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
TREES:
TEES:
Hole #7
The series of ridges on the right side of the fairway here
create another interesting landform, but the hole doesnt
use them as it sits. We would fill in the right-hand fairway
bunker, widen the fairway to that side, and clear back
some of the oaks to encourage play up the right. The
green would shift slightly to the right, in line with the two
big oaks to the right of the current green, and sit a bit
lower so that it feels like the fairway tumbles over the last
ridge into more of a punchbowl green. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
TEES:
Hole #8
One of the most dramatic par-4s on the course, the 7th is
somewhat out of scale with the rest because the fairway
has been widened around the bunkers at the corner. We
recommend eliminating the fairway bunkers here, and
letting the end of the ridge be part of the fairway, so that
players are more tempted down the left side where their
drives might kick left into trouble. We would then narrow
the right side, so that long hitters have to hit a better
controlled tee shot. We also recommend deepening the
bunker at the left front of the green and extending it to
cover a bit more of the left side, as it did years ago.
-Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
No changes
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
No changes
TEES:
No changes
Hole #9
We understand that this new green has been relatively
controversial, but we like the orientation of the new green
instead of the previous version that ran from left to right,
which set up easier for the long hitters who could play
down the hill to the left on the tee shot, but harder for
everyone else. We feel it should be a mixed blessing to
drive long and left, instead of clearly favoring the long hitter.
We would like to reshape the green a bit and eliminate the
straight-line ridge along the left front by putting a bunker
into the left face of the green. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
No changes
TREES:
No changes
TEES:
No changes
Hole #10
We feel that combining the 9th and 10th into an uphill
par-5 should yield one of the best holes on the course after
some earthmoving work to shift the big nob that is behind
the 9th green now. Unlike the 4th and 15th, the new 10th
would not rely on extreme landforms or a general lack of
playability to function as a par-5.
The new tee shot would turn around a softened version
of the big nob with two big bunkers built into its face
and require second shots to skirt an angled fairway
bunker in order to shorten the hole. The green site will
remain largely the same, though I think there are some
opportunities to turn this into a more contoured green as
a means of addressing the extremely severe slope in the
current green. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
TEES:
Hole #11
On my first look at this hole from the tee I found it
appealing, though somewhat out of character with the rest
of the greens on the course; but closer inspection of the
green revealed problems with the steep bank on the left
and the awkward terraces that make it difficult to putt up
along the left side of the green. We think it would be better
to shift the green right so there is a bit of buffer room
between the hillside and the left side of the green. Longer
term, we also think its important to explore possibilities
for restoring the creek to the right of the green.
-Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
TEES:
TREES:
No changes
Hole #12
This is a good, strong par 4 up along the fence line, though
the fairway needs to be widened on the right. The position
of the green is fine, but the back of it should be lowered
and the right front bunker extended to take some tilt out
of the green; at present only a small portion in the middle
right is flat enough for hole locations. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
TREES:
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
Hole #13
This is the best looking tee shot on the course to my
eye, especially if some of the trees along the right are
removed; but it is very dangerous at present because the
16th is right in the landing area. The last 100 yards of
the hole are artificially flat and the green is pretty dull;
shifting the green back a bit might allow it to appear more
natural. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
TREES:
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
No changes
Hole #14
The tee construction for the 14th is poorly done, with
the front tee obscuring nearly all of the ground short of
the green. The green doesnt quite take advantage of its
setting in a natural bowl. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
TREES:
No changes
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
Hole #15
The 15th is an absolute mess of a golf hole, and the
problems with the location of the 16th tee compound the
difficulty of fixing it. The sharpness of the dogleg with all of
the overhanging trees on the left means that short hitting
members have nowhere to go with their second shots
-- for those that can carry the creek there is no viable
landing area on the other side and for those that cant the
approach up the hill from the lay up area is unreasonable.
At the same time, its a ridiculousely short par-5 for good
players. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
TEES:
Hole #16
The most immediate problem with this hole is that the
tee is in an incredibly dangerous spot relative to the 13th
fairway - it needs to be moved. We are not big fans of the
trees along the right side of the hole and bunkering that
tries to force play to the left. We would prefer to see the
trees replaced by a couple of random bunkers and the
fairway widened to the right, to tempt golfers to drive up
in front of the green. This is one of the best greens on the
course and its subtle difficulties should be preserved in
any reconstruction. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
No changes
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
BUNKERS:
TEES:
Hole #17
For us the 17th is one of the most appealing holes on the
course, though its quite difficult for the short hitter due to
the trees on the inside corner of the dogleg, which block
out a short drive down the left from playing toward the
green. Certain trees should be cut back to minimize this
effect, and perhaps the fairway in front of the green on the
left could be enlarged to help out the weaker golfer. The
rest of the hole needs no change. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
No changes
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TREES:
TEES:
No changes
Hole #18
This is the sort of finishing hole we detest ... a fairly simple
and straightforward hole for the better golfers, but an
absolute beast for shorter hitters, since there is no good
spot for forward tees. The uphill nature of the second shot
is daunting, and the narrow strip of fairway leading to the
green is more likely to shuttle short shots back down the
hill than to help them home. -Tom Doak
GREEN COMPLEX:
BUNKERS:
FAIRWAY:
TEES:
TREES:
No changes