Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • United States v. Claudio Campanella, 73 F.3d 359, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Загружено:

    Scribd Government Docs
    41 просмотров1 страница
    Claudio Campanella appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Исходное описание:

    Filed: 1996-01-04 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 73 F.3d 359 Docket: 95-6770

    Авторское право

    © Public Domain

    Доступные форматы

    PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    Claudio Campanella appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Авторское право:

    Public Domain
    Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    41 просмотров1 страница

    United States v. Claudio Campanella, 73 F.3d 359, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Загружено:

    Scribd Government Docs
    Claudio Campanella appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Авторское право:

    Public Domain
    Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    73 F.

    3d 359
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


    v.
    Claudio CAMPANELLA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 95-6770.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
    Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

    Claudio Campanella, Appellant Pro Se.


    James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Campanella Nos. CR-92-444-A; CA-95325-AM (E.D.Va. Apr. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    Вам также может понравиться