Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4254
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-03-339; CR-03-246; CR-03-247)
Submitted:
October 1, 2004
Decided:
November 5, 2004
PER CURIAM:
Michael Shane Satterfield pled guilty to three counts of
bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) (2000) (Counts 1-3), and was
sentenced as a career offender, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
4B1.1
(2003),
to
term
of
160
months
imprisonment.
386
U.S.
738
(1967),
raising
as
potentially
brief
raising
additional
issues.
Counsel
for
After consideration
We affirm
- 2 -
The record
Because
Under
the plain error test, United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-37
(1993), a defendant must show that (1) error occurred; (2) the
error was plain; and (3) the error affected his substantial rights.
Id. at 732.
may exercise its discretion to notice the error only if the error
seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation
of judicial proceedings.
Satterfield
first
argues
that
his
career
offender
additional
offense
level
for
- 3 -
each
bank.
Presumably,
United
States v. Wilson, 198 F.3d 467, 472 n.* (4th Cir. 1999).
The
without merit.
Satterfield next claims that the district court erred
when it counted his third-degree burglary conviction as a predicate
conviction because he served only seven months of the one-to-seven
year sentence.
Because
- 4 -
To succeed on a claim
391 (4th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 1111 (2004).
Here,
AFFIRMED
- 5 -