Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Cason v. MDPSCS, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Загружено:

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 просмотров2 страницы
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Marc S. Cason, Sr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland correctional and medical entities and staff. The district court denied relief to Cason and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Исходное описание:

    Filed: 2006-04-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7467

    Авторское право

    © Public Domain

    Доступные форматы

    PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Marc S. Cason, Sr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland correctional and medical entities and staff. The district court denied relief to Cason and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Авторское право:

    Public Domain
    Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    9 просмотров2 страницы

    Cason v. MDPSCS, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Загружено:

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Marc S. Cason, Sr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Maryland correctional and medical entities and staff. The district court denied relief to Cason and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Авторское право:

    Public Domain
    Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7467

    MARC S. CASON, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    M.D.P.S.C.S.; DIVISION OF CORRECTION; TERISITA
    JACKSON, CMSII; R. THOMAS, CO II; R. WEEKS, CO
    II; EMSA MEDICAL SERVICES; BARBARA PEACE, RN;
    STEVE REYNOLDS, RN; DAPHNE GREEN, RN; KELLY,
    Nurse Practitioner, and any other medical
    staff responsible for the mistreatment and
    negligence of the plaintiff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA05-2400-CCB)

    Submitted:

    March 30, 2006

    Decided: April 6, 2006

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Cason v.

    MDPSCS, No. CA-05-2400-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 7, 2005).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    Вам также может понравиться