Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 15-4199
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:13-cr-00842-RBH-4)
Submitted:
Decided:
September 9, 2015
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
Brown
pleaded
guilty,
pursuant
to
written
plea
11(c)(1)(C)
agreement,
would be appropriate.
stipulating
that
108-month
sentence
certifying
that
there
are
no
meritorious
issues
for
We affirm
Prior to accepting a
it
informs
the
defendant
of,
and
determines
that
he
any
mandatory
minimum
penalty,
the
maximum
possible
must
ensure
that
the
defendants
2
is
voluntary,
v.
General,
278
F.3d
389,
393
(4th
Cir.
2002),
and
A defendant may
waive his appellate rights, and this court will enforce the
waiver if it is valid and the issue appealed is within the scope
of the waiver.
Cir.
2012).
if
district
court
questions
Cir. 2012).
We
review
de
novo
the
validity
of
an
appellate
waiver.
United States v. Copeland, 707 F.3d 522, 528 (4th Cir. 2013).
Here,
the
record
establishes
that
Brown
knowingly
and
plea
reviewed
colloquy,
Brown
confirmed
3
that
he
the
plea
agreement,
appeal.
which
clearly
stated
that
he
waived
his
right
to
stands.
Finally,
while
Browns
counsel
questions
the
districts
imposed
as
result
of
an
incorrect
application
of
the
raises
no
such
claims
on
appeal;
rather,
she
offender
unreasonable
and
sentence.
whether
the
Browns
district
sentence
court
was
imposed
based
on
an
the
See United
States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 339-40 (4th Cir. 2011); United
States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 364 (7th Cir. 2005).
Thus,
courts
108-month
term
of
imprisonment,
we
dismiss
Browns
appeal.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record in
this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.
We
If Brown
Counsels
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
DISMISSED IN PART