Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 12-4144
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cr-02118-GRA-1)
Submitted:
August 7, 2012
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Garworth Williams pled guilty without a plea agreement
to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, 1708 (2006).
Manual
(2011)
and
sentenced
imprisonment
imprisonment.
at
fifty-one
Williams
to
to
sixty
months
fifty-one
months
We affirm.
This
reasonableness
standard.
This
court
reviews
under
Williams
deferential
sentence
for
abuse-of-discretion
review
entails
appellate
the
the
sentence.
Id. at 51.
defendants
the
advisory
district
Guidelines
court
of
both
and
whether
reasonableness
of
procedural
considers
substantive
consideration
properly
range,
gave
calculated
the
parties
the
an
Id. at 49-51.
procedural
error,
this
court
reviews
it
for
Id. at 51.
on
appeal
reasonable.
that
the
sentence
is
substantively
3553(a)
445 F.3d
375,
factors.
379
(4th
United
Cir.
2006)
States
v.
(internal
Montes-Pineda,
quotation
marks
omitted).
In this case, the district court correctly calculated
and
considered
the
advisory
Guidelines
range,
heard
argument
conduct
by
Williams,
and
to
protect
the
public.
that
the
within-Guidelines
3
sentence
is
substantively
reasonable.
We
therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED