Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 15-6175
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02188-BR)
Submitted:
Decided:
December 8, 2015
PER CURIAM:
John Kanios appeals the district courts order committing
him to the custody of the Attorney General in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 4246(d) (2012).
We affirm.
the
[district]
court
finds
by
clear
and
convincing
to
district
property
courts
of
another.
finding
that
18
the
U.S.C.
4246(d).
Government
has
The
established
be
overturned
on
appeal
unless
it
is
clearly
erroneous.
United States v. LeClair, 338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2003);
United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992).
Dr. Maureen Reardon a staff psychiatrist at the Federal
Medical
Center
in
Butner,
North
Carolina
(FMC
Butner)
Kanios
mild
thought
disorder,
and
mood
disturbances,
to
include
violence
damaging
included
property,
two
and
incidents
aggravated
of
domestic
burglary;
violence,
Kanios
had
an
extensive history with firearms; and Kanios did not have any
support from family or friends.
Graddy
likewise
reviewing
concluded,
relevant
records,
that
interviewing
Kanios
Kanios
and
suffers
from
hearing,
Dr.
forensic psychology.
underlying
charges
Reardon
testified
as
an
expert
in
Kanios,
the
reasons
behind
her
an
FMC
Butner
risk-assessment
panel
concurred
in
her
reports
district
court
prepared
found
by
by
clear
Reardon
and
and
Dr.
convincing
Graddy,
evidence
the
that
United
States
2002).
v.
Williams,
299
F.3d
673,
677
(8th
Cir.
future
harm
to
persons
or
property.
United
States
v.
Kanios
has
long
history
of
engaging
in
violent
had
underlying
convictions
evincing
potential
risk
of
Reardons
report
Graddys
independent
observations
of
as
speculative,
it
was
conclusions,
Kanios
behavior,
supported
relied
and
on
included
by
Dr.
specific
a
detailed
with
contentions
are
we
oral
affirm
the
argument
adequately
district
because
presented
in
courts
the
the
facts
order.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED