Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 15-4445
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:14-cr-00331-GRA-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Torry Tarez Davis pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to
possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and marijuana,
in
violation
(2012).
of
The
imprisonment.
21
U.S.C.
district
841(a)(1),
court
sentenced
(b)(1)(C),
Davis
to
(b)(1)(D)
151
months
California,
386
U.S.
meritorious
grounds
738
for
(1967),
appeal
stating
but
that
questioning
there
are
whether
no
the
filed
attorney
and
supplemental
the
pro
Government
se
brief,
failed
to
asserting
alert
him
that
his
to
the
After careful
to
which
he
is
pleading
guilty,
the
maximum
possible
Fed. R. Crim. P.
must
ensure
that
the
defendants
is
voluntary,
in
the
district
court
or
otherwise
preserve
any
Cir. 2014).
and
designation
the
possible
under
U.S.
applicability
Sentencing
of
the
career
offender
Guidelines
Manual
4B1.1
(2014).
Next,
we
review
Davis
sentence
for
reasonableness,
of
the
sentence.
Id.
at
51.
In
assessing
procedural
court
reasonableness,
properly
we
calculated
consider
the
whether
defendants
the
advisory
district
Sentencing
appropriate
(2012)
sentence,
factors,
sentence.
and
considered
sufficiently
the
18
U.S.C.
explained
3553(a)
the
selected
Id.
showing
against
the
that
the
sentence
18
U.S.C.
is
3553(a)
unreasonable
factors.
when
United
measured
States
v.
Louthian, 756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct.
421 (2014).
After
criminal
adopting
history
the
correctly
category,
and
calculated
Guidelines
offense
range
level,
contained
in
contention,
Governments
sentencing
individualized
factors.
we
sentence,
find
nothing
argument.
explicitly
The
Contrary to
inflammatory
court
grounded
then
in
the
in
issued
the
an
3553(a)
Further,
we
conclude
that
Davis
remaining
pro
se
nonjurisdictional
defects.
(internal
citations
and
quotation
marks omitted)).
In
accordance
with
Anders,
we
have
reviewed
the
entire
We
therefore
affirm
Davis
conviction
and
sentence.
may
move
in
this
court
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED