Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 13-4512
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:12-cr-00553-PMD-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Herminio
Solano-Martinez
appeals
his
conviction
and
intent
violation
to
of
distribute
500
grams
U.S.C.
(2012),
18
(b)(1)(B) (2012).
accordance
with
or
more
21
of
U.S.C.
cocaine,
in
841(a)(1),
v.
California,
386
U.S.
738
(1967),
reasonableness
minimum sentence.
of
Solano-Martinezs
statutory
mandatory
Finding
no error, we affirm.
Because
Solano-Martinez
did
not
move
the
district
United States
v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002); see Henderson v.
Untied States, 133 S. Ct. 1121, 1126-27 (2013) (discussing plain
error standard).
Martinezs conviction.
We review a sentence under a deferential abuse-ofdiscretion standard.
(2007).
that
the
error,
district
such
as
court
committed
improperly
no
significant
calculating
the
procedural
Guidelines
range,
is
substantive
procedurally
reasonable,
reasonableness
of
the
we
sentence
then
at 51.
consider
imposed,
If the
the
tak[ing]
per se reasonable[.]
Guidelines
sentence,
considered
the
3553(a)
statutory
mandatory
Solano-Martinezs
minimum.
sentence
is
We
therefore
procedurally
and
conclude
that
substantively
reasonable.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire
record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.
3
We
therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
This
court
but
counsel
believes
that
such
petition
would
be
AFFIRMED