Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 12-4340
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:10-cr-00169-MOC-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
March 4, 2013
PER CURIAM:
Robert Wilson Driver pled guilty to being a felon in
possession of a firearm.
the
from
right
to
an
appeal
suppress.
On
unreasonably
detained
traffic stop.
appeal,
he
him
the
denial
asserts
beyond
the
of
that
his
motion
police
permissible
to
officers
scope
of
We affirm.
When
the
must
district
construe
the
court
has
evidence
denied
in
the
suppression
light
most
motion,
favorable
we
to
the
Government.
conduct.
(1968),
to
determine
the
limits
of
police
Cir. 2011).
duration
seizure.
to
satisfy
the
conditions
of
an
investigative
opinion).
that Officer Wright was justified in pulling the car over for
erratic
driving,
and
thus,
there
is
no
challenge
to
the
detaining
necessary
to
vehicles
request
registration,
run
occupants
drivers
computer
for
license
check,
the
and
and
time
vehicle
issue
citation.
Cir.
the
2011).
While
the
officer
may
briefly
inquire
into
prosecution
sustained
of
course
justification.
the
of
traffic
stop
and
investigation
Guijon-Ortiz,
660
F.3d
embark[]
on
absent
at
another
additional
766
(internal
initial
first place.
Cir. 2008).
traffic
violation
that
prompted
the
stop
in
the
Id.
totality
officer
has
of
a
the
particularized,
have
and
objective
analyze
basis
whether
for
the
suspecting
legal wrongdoing.
(2002).
circumstances
been
instructed
approach[.]
to
take
commonsense
and
contextual
We
conclude
that
reasonable
suspicion
of
criminal
arrived
possession
of
on
the
scene
marijuana.
and
Ellison
was
determined
walked
out
to
of
the
be
in
woods
shortly after the car in which Driver was the passenger was
stopped.
frisked
Herron.
stated
that
he
was
planning
to
meet
Ellison was
Driver
and
710
(4th
Cir.
2012).
In
the
course
of
the
next
ten
gathering
of
reasonable
suspicion,
we
find
that
Wright
the stop.
secured
the
area,
including
dealing
with
the
unexpected
from
Herron;
and
he
ran
record
checks
on
the
neither the stop nor Wrights actions prior to the point where
the stop was prolonged based on reasonable suspicion violated
the Fourth Amendment.
Driver
encounter,
argues
abandoned
investigation
and
investigation.
any
that
Wright,
pretense
instead
of
conducted
very
a
early
in
the
traffic-infraction
a
robbery-suspect
Wright
should
have
finished
checking
ended.
Because
Herrons
this
information,
happened
prior
to
the
stop
seeking
the
appropriate
inquiry
is
whether
Wright
officers
activity
was
obtained
afoot.
reasonable
If
the
suspicion
that
traffic-infraction
criminal
investigation
Driver
should
have
been
sent
on
their
way.
Once
the
detention
officers
when
investigating
the
the
traffic
were
violation
or
not
either
properly
properly
investigating
also
argues
that
the
officers
did
not
have
Driver
contends that Ellison was unarmed and cooperative and that even
the officers did not believe that Herron or Driver were involved
with the marijuana found on Ellison.
Driver,
the
insufficient
relevant
to
show
factors,
reasonable
even
taken
suspicion
Therefore, according to
together,
that
Driver
are
was
Based upon our review of the record, when the stop was
prolonged,
officers
knew
that
(1)
Driver
was
out
past
his
on
vehicle
the
and
physical
Drivers
description
criminal
of
the
record;
assailant
(4)
Drivers
and
his
criminal
Driver
was
neighborhood
far
with
from
no
home
lighting;
in
an
upper-middle-class
(6)
on
the
way
to
the
(7)
when
the
car
Wrights
initially
marked
drove
police
off
car
down
approached;
dead
end
and
(8)
might
be
consistent
innocent
behavior,
these
to
meet
Ellison
and
commit
robbery
or
be
given
due
weight,
we
7
conclude
that
the
officers
the
stop.
See
Branch,
537
F.3d
at
336;
see
also United States v. Clarkson, 551 F.3d 1196, 1202 (10th Cir.
2009) (holding that time of night and a match of even a general
suspect
description
are
relevant
factors
in
determining
(2d
Cir.
2008)
(noting
that
it
is
proper
to
consider
Accordingly,
AFFIRMED