0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
10 просмотров3 страницы
This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It discusses the appeal of Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez's 235-month prison sentence for distributing crack cocaine. The court affirmed the sentence, finding that the district court did not clearly err when it included eight ounces of crack that Mercedez-Gonzalez had negotiated but failed to sell to an undercover agent in calculating his offense level under the sentencing guidelines. The court concluded that Mercedez-Gonzalez intended and was capable of supplying the eight ounces of crack when he made the agreement.
This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It discusses the appeal of Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez's 235-month prison sentence for distributing crack cocaine. The court affirmed the sentence, finding that the district court did not clearly err when it included eight ounces of crack that Mercedez-Gonzalez had negotiated but failed to sell to an undercover agent in calculating his offense level under the sentencing guidelines. The court concluded that Mercedez-Gonzalez intended and was capable of supplying the eight ounces of crack when he made the agreement.
Авторское право:
Public Domain
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It discusses the appeal of Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez's 235-month prison sentence for distributing crack cocaine. The court affirmed the sentence, finding that the district court did not clearly err when it included eight ounces of crack that Mercedez-Gonzalez had negotiated but failed to sell to an undercover agent in calculating his offense level under the sentencing guidelines. The court concluded that Mercedez-Gonzalez intended and was capable of supplying the eight ounces of crack when he made the agreement.
Авторское право:
Public Domain
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-4633 BERNARDO MERCEDEZ-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Jorge Pizarro, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-258) Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: April 9, 1999 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. _________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Lisa B. Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. _________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez appeals the 235-month sentence he received after he pled guilty to distribution of crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. 841(a) (1994). He contends that eight ounces of crack he negotiated to sell an undercover agent should not have been used to calculate his offense level under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual 2D1.1 (1995). We affirm the sentence. Mercedez-Gonzalez (using the name Jorge Pizarro) was present in a fortified apartment* in October 1996 when state undercover agent Kevin Canty bought 25.2 grams of crack from Poppy, a Hispanic male. On October 31, 1996, when Canty tried to buy crack from Poppy again, Mercedez-Gonzalez told him that Poppy had gone to Puerto Rico. However, Mercedez-Gonzalez sold Agent Canty two and a half ounces (65.8 grams) of crack. Canty reduced his purchase from three ounces to two and a half ounces after they dickered about the price. Canty estimated that Mercedez-Gonzalez had"a couple more ounces" in the bag from which he weighed out three ounces initially. On November 12, 1996, Canty and an agent from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) went to the apartment and Mercedez-Gonzalez agreed to sell Canty eight ounces (226.8 grams) of crack for $8600, a reduced price. They agreed to meet the following week after Mercedez-Gonzalez made a trip to New York. However, Canty and the DEA agent did not contact Mercedez-Gonzalez until December 5, 1996. On that day, when Canty told Mercedez Gonzalez that he was ready for the eight-ounce purchase, MercedezGonzalez told Canty he did not sell drugs. A search of the apartment where the prior sales had taken place resulted in the seizure of crack cocaine residue, scales, and some money, including marked police _________________________________________________________________ *There were steel bars across the door on the inside. 2
funds. Mercedez-Gonzalez was arrested and later pled guilty to crack
distribution. At his sentencing, Mercedez-Gonzalez objected to the inclusion of the eight ounces in the offense level calculation. However, the district court found that Mercedez-Gonzalez was capable of supplying the agent with eight ounces of crack and intended to do so when he made the agreement, even though the sale never took place. We review the district court's factual determination under the clearly erroneous standard. See United States v. Williams, 152 F.3d 294, 301 (4th Cir. 1998). Here, we cannot find that the district court clearly erred in making its determination. Canty testified about his dealings with Mercedez-Gonzalez, but Mercedez-Gonzalez provided no evidence of his inability or unwillingness to sell eight ounces of crack beyond the fact that the eight-ounce sale did not take place. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
United States v. Mario Alberto Agis-Meza, United States of America v. Bulmaro Agis-Meza, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Negrete, United States of America v. Moises Lopez-Ponce, A.K.A. Moises Ponce Lopez, A.K.A. Antonio Jose Rodriguez, 99 F.3d 1052, 11th Cir. (1996)
Bobby Ray Wilson v. Winston-Salem Police Department D.J. Seamon, Officer George L. Sweat, Chief Francis Storey, Clerk of Court Tom Keith, District Attorney Edwin Shellhouse, Bobby Ray Wilson v. Forsyth County Jail Forsyth County Detention Center Ron Barker Michael Schweitzer Garland Wallace Correctional Medical Services, Bobby Ray Wilson v. Pamela Taylor R.L. Barren, Detective, Winston-Salem Police Department S.G. Honaker, 59 F.3d 168, 4th Cir. (1995)