Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305688093
READS
5 authors, including:
Jinhua Shi
AMEC
21 PUBLICATIONS 30 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
PVP2016-63040
A Comparison of Different Design Codes on Fatigue Life Assessment Methods
Jinhua Shi
Amec Foster Wheeler
19B Brighouse Court
Barnett Way
Gloucester, GL4 3RT, UK
Claude Faidy
Consultant - CF Int Engineering
Intgrit-vieillissement des Structures
Codes et Normes-Sret Nuclaire
France
Liwu Wei
Amec Foster Wheeler
19B Brighouse Court
Barnett Way
Gloucester, GL4 3RT, UK
Andrew Wasylyk
CORDEL, WNA
Tower House, 10
Southampton Street,
London WC2E 7HA, UK
ABSTRACT
Different pressure vessel and piping design codes and
standards have adopted different fatigue analysis methods. In
order to make some contribution to current efforts to harmonize
international design codes and standards, a review of fatigue
analysis methods for a number of selected nuclear and nonnuclear design codes and standards has been carried out. The
selected design codes and standards are ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code Section III Subsection NB and Section
VIII Division 2, EN 12952, EN 13445, EN 13480, PD 5500,
RCC-M, RCC-MRx, JSME, PNAEG and R5. This paper
presents the initial review results.
The results of the study could be used as part of the ongoing work of the Codes and Standards Task Force of the World
Nuclear Association (WNA) Cooperation in Reactor Design
Evaluation and Licensing (CORDEL) Working Group.
Nawal Prinja
Amec Foster Wheeler
Booths Park
Knutsford
Cheshire, WA16 8QZ, UK
INTRODUCTION
2.1
2.3
PD 5500
2.4
BS EN 12952-3
3.2
The strain range based method has been used in ASME III
Subsection NH and R5 for high temperature applications.
3.1
R5
RCC-M ANNEX Z D
t m, n
formula: .d
E
.
3
REMARKS
INTERNATIONAL
CODES
AND
STANDARDS HARMONIZATION
[7]
[8]
[9]
[11]
[6]
[10]
[12]
[13]
[14]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[15]
7
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
REFERENCES
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
Code/Standard
ASME III Subsection NB
BS EN 12952-3
PD 5500
Material
Carbon, low alloy and high tensile steels
Carbon, low alloy and high tensile steels
Austenitic steels, nickel-chromium-iron alloy,
nickel-iron-chromium alloy and nickel-copper
alloy
High Strength Steel Bolting
Carbon, Low Alloy, Series 4xx, and High
Tensile Strength Steels
Carbon, Low Alloy, Series 4xx, and High
Tensile Strength Steels
Series 3xx High Alloy Steels, Nickel-ChromiumIron Alloy, Nickel-Iron-Chromium Alloy, and
Nickel-Copper Alloy
Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Iron, Alloys X,
G, C-4, And C-276
High Strength Steel Bolting
Carbon, Low Alloy, Series 4xx, and High
Tensile Strength Steels
Series 3xx High Alloy Steels, Nickel-ChromiumIron Alloy, Nickel-Iron-Chromium Alloy, and
Nickel-Copper Alloy
Nickel-Chromium-Molybdenum-Iron, Alloys X,
G, C-4, and C-276
All steels
Ferritic steels
Austenitic steels
Nickel alloys
Bolts
425
370
All
All
All
All
Amplitude
Amplitude
Y
Y
[13-16]
Y
Y
371
552
Amplitude
371
793 - 892
Amplitude
427
All
Amplitude
427
371
All
All
Y
Y
Amplitude
Amplitude
Y
Y
Y
Y
371
All
Range
427
All
Range
427
800
350
430
450
As above
All
All
All
All
All
All
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Range
Range
Range
Range
Range
Range
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
All
All
All
All
All
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y