Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CONTENTS
The People Who Made This Book
Foreword
13
17
27
33
37
41
49
53
59
67
75
81
87
91
101
109
121
123
127
Selected Bibliography
137
Appendices
141
clinic, but always with opposItIon from medical and governmental authorities. However, from 1950 to the mid-1980s,
a number of researCh scientists, working independently, have
slowly been verifying the scientific principles upon which
Rife' s clinical cures of the 1930s were based. A body of
recognized scientific evidence now overwhelmingly supports
the original cancer theories articulated and demonstrated by
Rife 50 years ago. This includes modern AIDS researchers.
In the 1950s, John Cralle-engineer, machinist, laboratory
analyst, health researcher and inventor-became Rife's partner. Crane, born in 1915. worked at Rife's side from 1950
until Rife 's death in 1971. During this time, he learned all the
secrets of Rife's cancer cure ... and all the details of its
suppression. Together, the two men designed and constructed
new and better equipment. and managed to interest a new
generation of doctors in the possibilities of a genuine, lasting
and painless cancer cure. And again the authorities struck .
Crane was jailed, equipment was smashed, records were
destroyed. Again the motives driving on the forces of suppression were the same. By sharing the long hidden facts, as well
as thousands of documents preserved from the 19305, Crane
has enabled the full story to be told.
Author Barry Lynes, born in 1942. is an investigative reporter who lives in California. His areas of research , articles
and books include economic theory. climate changes, history,
U.S.-Soviet relations and alternative health treatments. In
early 1986, he became acquainted with John Crane and heard
the 'entire Rife story first-hand. Initially skeptical , Lynes
changed his mind after examining the wealth of documents in
Crane's possession. Outraged by the injustices that had destroyed Rife's work, Lynes decided to reveal in book form
what had happened .
You hold the result in your hands.
Foreword
QuanlUm theory has shown the imIXlssibility of separating
they have not played the role of the native in the following
script from Magellan's logbook.
"When Magellan's expeditions first landed at Terra del
Fuego, the Fuegans, who for centuries had been isolated with
their canoe culture, were unable to see the ships anchored in
the bay. The big ships were so far beyond their experience
that, despite their bulk, the horizon continued unbroken: The
ships were invisible. This was learned on later expeditions to
the area when the Fuegans described how. according to one
account, the shaman had first brought to the villagers' attention that the strangers had arrived in something which although
preposterous beyond belief, could actually be seen if one
looked carefully. We ask how could they not see the
ships ... they were so obvious, so real . .. yet others would
ask how we cannot see things just as obvious."
Nowhere is the frailty of sight-perception so troublesome
as in microscopy. Recently, a medical writer stated that 100
years ago the microscope was a mysterious instrument. No
doubt it was at that time, but today it is an even more mysterious instrument. Tools and techniques of essentially infinite
variety have evolved to extend human vision enonnously, but
with inherent complexities. The microscope itself contains the
variables of lens configuration. magnification, resolution and
lighting. Thousands of stains and staining techniques, evolved
over many years, have contributed heavily to complexifying
the art of microscopy. While microscopists acknowledge these
inherent variables, in uncharted waters they remain extremely
troublesome.
But the microscope does more than simply magnify small
objects to visible size, it transports the mind's eye into a world
of incredible complexity of form, flux and process, especially
when the specimen is alive or was once alive. The space
traveler has access to better means of orientation than does the
microbiologist.
Thus, the microscope is at once a marvelous tool and a
reservoir of seemingly endless confusion even without introducing the factor of variations in human sight-perception. No
doubt, we should stand in awe of progress made. But we
cannot longer thus stand. Old health problems have become
4
THE
CANCER
CURE
THAT
WORKED!
Chapter I
tested successfully in clinical trials, and in fact was used secretly for years afterwards- continuing to cure cancer as well
as other diseases.
Yet, despite the blackout which prevented doctors and
researchers from knowing about and improving the cure, other
scientific investigators continued to verify the basic principles.
In the late 1940s and early 1950s, cooperating researchers at
a hospital laboratory in New Jersey and a research insti tute in
Pennsylvania made similar discoveries which unknowingly
aligned them with the Cali fornia group of a decade earlier. In
1950, these researchers prepared to make a presentation before
the New York Academy of Sc iences . But again , political
forces intervened and the symposium was cancelled.
Then, in 1953. the basic science which validated the
theories of the California group was explained by the New
Jersey group at an international microbiology conference in
Rome, Ital y. The New York Times and the Washington Post
reported the discovery.
However. upon the grou p's return to America, they discovered that the same powerful forces which had prevented
an American announcement in 1950 had secretly managed to
termi nate the financing of the New Jersey laboratory. The
leading researcher was forced to move to California and stan
anew.
In December of that same year, the leader of the California
group and the man most responsible for the successful healing
of cancer in the 1930s- after years of silence- published a
description of the methods and results of the cancer cure . The
authorities at the government's National Cancer Institute in
Washington, D.C. received a copy at the National Library of
Medicine outside Wash ington, D.C. in Bethesda. Maryland.
Bm they ignored it. The library staff responsible for filing and
circulating such reports to the officials determining cancer
research policy either failed to do their jobs or they met with
opposition from those in charge of the war on cancer.
Still. new researchers continued to appear on the scene.
The process of rediscovering what the California group had
found continued. In the late 1950s, an international conference
was held in Europe . The topic was the same topic which the
\4
16
Chapter 2
18
19
20
......
de
~.-"'
Thus, 50 years after Kendall's discovery, even with substantial evidence. the erroneous orthodox view continued to
dominate medical theory, cancer research, and cancer treat
ment.
One of Kendall's renowned supporters was Dr. Edward
Rosenow of the Mayo Clinic. Rosenow was viciously attacked
by Thomas Rivers of the rival Rockefeller Institute. As
reported in the 1976 article in New Age Journal, Rosenow's
son , Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, Jr., Chief Administrative
Officer of the American College of Physicians, "asserts that
his father was all but accused by Rockefeller Institute research
moguls of experimental dishonesty."
Rosenow told his son, "They simply won't listen."
(Rosenow's son later told how , while a student of Zinsser's
at Harvard, Zinsser had admitted to Rosenow Jr. that he, Zinsser, had not even used Rosenow Sr:s medium in failing to
duplicate and then condemning Rosenow' s test results.)
The medical moguls apparently wouldn't listen even to one
of their own. In 1911, Peyton Rous of the Rockefeller Institute
provided the first evidence that a virus could cause a cancer.
Yet for decades the orthodox view was that cancer resulted
from "somatic mutation"- a gene develops a flaw and disorganizes cellular function.
David Locke. author of a book on viruses published in
1974, recalled meeting Peyton Rous in the corridors of the
Rockefeller Institute during the mid-century and being
shocked to learn that a micro-organism could be the cause of
cancer. Locke wrote, "The 1940s and 1950s were the heyday
of the somatic mutation theory. At the time, it was scientific
+
22
Aorence Seibert, Professor Emeritus of BiOChemistry. University of Pennsylvania and Dr. Irene Diller from the Institute
for Cancer Research in Philadelphia made essentially the same
argument to the New York Academy of Sciences in 1967.
Seibert's book Pebbles on the Hill of a Scielllist (1968)
includes the following: " We found that we were able to isolate
bacteria from every piece of tumor and every acute leukem ic
blood specimen that we had. This was published in the Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences."
Seibert also clearly recognized pleomorphism as the underlying scientific reality which must be appreciated if cancer is
to be cured:
"One of the most interesting propenies of these bacteria is
23
25
26
Chapter 3
Medicine in America
The suppression of the successful cancer cure first used in
1934 took place because of a unique sct of factors. Among
these factors were: the virtual one-man rule within the American Medical Association, scientific rivalries, institutional
pride and arrogance, a power-hungry head at Memorial SloanKettering determined to find his own cure for cancer even jf
it required squashing those with different views, pharmaceutical companies with vested interests which slowly took control of the direction of America's cancer program, and political-media timidity in the area of medical oversight. There
were a number of junctures during the years since 1934 when,
if one person in a critical position had acted courageously, the
entire history of medicine in this century could have been
altered. But it didn't happen. The resulting cost in lives and
resources has been incalculable. It is not an exaggeration to
say that the cover-up, suppression, and failure to evaluate the
1934 cancer cure has been an American catastrophe exceeding
anything in our history. Even if the 1934 cure can be
implemented in the late 1980s, nothing can disguise the waste
and horror of what has happened.
The American Medical Association was formed in 1846,
but it wasn' l until 190 I that a reorgan ization enabled it to gain
power over how medici ne was practiced throughout America.
By becoming a confederation of state medical associations
and forcing doctors who wanted to belong to their county
medical society to join the state association. the AMA soon
increased its membership to include a majority of physicians.
Then, by accrediting medical schools, it began determi ning
the standards and practices of doctors. Those who refused to
confonn lost their license to practice medicine.
27
30
''The other major private sponsors of research were pharmaceutical companies, which grew rapidly after the
1920s. .. An estimate in 1945 put the research expenditures
of the drug companies at $40 million, compared to $25 million
for the foundations. universities, and research institutes."
Another major institution wh ich "staked its claim" in the
virgin territory of cancer research in the 1930-1950 period was
Memorial Sioan- Kenering Cancer Cenler in New York . Established in 1884 as the first cancer hospital in America, Memorial Sloan-Kettering from 1940 to the mid-1950s was the
center of drug testing for the largest pharmaceutical companies. Cornelius P. Rhoads, who had spent the 1930s at the
Rockefeller institute. became the director at Memorial SioanKettering in 1939. He remained in that position until his dealh
in 1959. Rhoads was Ihe head of the chemical warfare service
from 1943- 1945. and afterwards became the nation's premier
advocate of chemotherapy. According to Dr. Virginia
Li vingston-Wheeler, " Dr. Rhoads was determined to dictale
the cancer policies of the entire country."
It was Dr. Rhoads who prevented Dr. Irene Diller from
announcing the discovery of Ihe cancer micro-organism to the
New York Academy of Sciences in 1950. It also was Dr .
Rhoads who arranged for the fu nds for Dr. Caspe's New Jersey laboratory 10 be cancelled after s he announced the same
discovery in Ro me in 1953. And an I.R .S . investigation , instigated by an unident ified, powerful New York cancer aUlhority, added 10 her misery. The laboratory was closed.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering is closely tied to the American
Cancer Society. The American Cancer Society was founded
in 1913 by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and his business
associates. Reorgan ized after the war, the power positions on
its board were taken by pharmaceutical execut ives, advert ising
people , Sloan-Kettering trustees, and other orthodox treatment
proponents. The American Cancer Society has enormous
inOuence in the cancer world because its public appeals generate large amounts of money for research . As Ralph W. Moss,
fonner Assistant Director of Public Affairs at Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, made ex plicit , "The Society now
has tens of millions of dollars 10 distribute to those who favor
31
its growing power, and many powerful connections to disconcert those who oppose it:'
Yet with aU this weahh at its disposal for so many years,
and its purpose the eradication of cancer, the American Cancer
Society has not been able to find those scienti sts who have
scientifically isolated the cancer micro-organism or those
pioneer researchers and doctors who cured it in 1934 and afterwards. Bad luck, incompetence, or something else?
Thus the major players on the cancer field are the doctors,
the private research institutions. the pharmaceutical companies, the American Cancer Society, and also the U.S. government through the National Cancer Institute (organizing
research) and the Food and Drug Administration (the dreaded
FDA which keeps the outsiders on the defensive through raids,
legal harassment, and expensive testing procedures).
The people in these institutions, and especially their political management, all proclaim their professionalism, dedication , and expertise. The results tell a very different story .
Ralph Moss exposes the chink in the cancer establishment's
annor with a single quotation in The Cancer Syndrome. It is
by the late Sloan-Kettering chemotherapist David Kamofsky:
"The relevant matter in examining any form of treatment is
not the reputation of its proponent, the persuasiveness of his
theory , the eminence of its lay supporters , the testimony of
patients, or the existence of public controversy, but simplydoes the treatment work?"'
If only Rivers, Fishbein, Rhoads and the army of current
skeptical research-oriented scientists, bureaucrats, pharmaceutical spokesmen, philanthropists and other credentialed
professionals had honored the scientific and moral rightness
of Kamofsky's thought. the cure for cancer might not have
been suppressed for decades and might have a chance for a
swift testing and implementation today.
David M . Locke emphasized the same point as Kamofsky
in the book Viruses:
"One of the dicta of the University of Chicago's great cancer
researcher and Nobel Laureate, Charles B. Huggins. is: 'The
thing about cancer is to cure it. '"
32
Chapter 4
33
So he began to gather the tools necessary to do so: microscopes, electronic equipment, lubes, bacteriological equipment, cages for guinea pigs, cameras, and machinery to build
his own designs. Two San Diego industrialisls-Timken,
owner of the Timken Roller Bearing Company and Bridges,
owner of the Bridges Carriage Company-provided funds to
establish a laboratory and finance Rife's research.
By the late 1920s, the first phase of his work was completed. He had built his first microscope, one Ihat broke the
existing principles, and he had constructed instruments which
enabled him to electronically destroy specific pathological
micro-organisms.
In the years that followed, he would improve and perfect
these early models, identify and classify disease-causing
micro-organisms in a totally unique way, including their exact
M.O.R. or Monal Oscillatory Rate (the precise frequency
which "blew them up") and then , in cooperation with leading
bacteriologislS such as Rosenow and Kendall, along with leading doctors. cure cancer and other diseases in people.
Every step wa.~ controversial. original, difficult and timeconsuming. The opposition was powerful. They evemually
did break him and many of those who collaborated with him,
but not before Rife left records, microscopes, electronic frequency instruments, and methods which will enable later generations to establish an entirely new fonn of painless, non-drug
healing.
As one of Rife's co-workers recalled in 1958, fony-five
years after he met the genius of San Diego:
"He finally got to a point where from years of isolation and
clarification and purification of these filterable forms , he could
produce cancer in the guinea pigs in two weeks . He tried it on
rats. guinea pigs and rabbits, but he found finally that he could
confine his efforts to guinea pigs and white rats because every
doggone one was his pet. And he perfonned the operat ions on
them in the most meticulous operations you ever want to see
in all your born days. No doctor could ever come near to it.
34
36
Chapter 5
The 1920s
Rife began in 1920 by searching for an electronic means to
destroy the micro-organism which caused ruberculosis. It was
in that first year that the original radio frequen cy instrument
was built. Since the frequency which would kill the microorganism was unknown , Rife had to proceed by trial and error.
Rife and his associates conducted test after test.
Finally he achieved success, but the success produced more
problems. The micro-organism had been killed, but in several
cases the guinea pigs died of toxic poison ing . Three years
were spent in finding an answer. He suspected that a virus
from the bacteria was responsible. He would have to devise a
way to obtain the virus in pure form in order to determine its
frequency and thus kill it without injuring the pigs .
Rife 's first microscope also was completed in 1920
although he began building it in 19 17. From 1920 to 1925,
some 20,000 pathological tissues were sectioned and stai ned.
However, they failed to show any unknown bacteria or foreign
material under the highest power. Rife continued 10 improve
it, searching for a way to see the viruses .
He knew about the 19th century work of Voghn and later
Robert Cook who were able to destroy the rod form of the
tu berculosis bacteri a with vacc ine and anti-toxins , but still
were left with experimental animals wh ich died. Rife theorized
that they had released the virus by kill ing the bacteria-just as
he had done when he destroyed the Bacillus of Tuberculosis
with his radio frequency instrument. Unless he could see the
vi rus and detennine its frequency, he couldn't cure TB wi th
his method. But if he could see in his microscope both the
bacterial and the viral forms of TB , he could determine their
separate frequencies and kill them both at the same time.
37
1929.
Rife would have to make time for experimental demonstra
tions , letters, and meetings. He'd have to deal wi th more
people, and still preserve time for the exhausting research
which only he could do because only he knew how to do it.
Others could help, and they did. but they also got in the way.
Then there would be the businessmen promoters and doctors
who would try to steal his work. There would be the opposi
tion from scientists whose own authority, prest ige, and posi
tion would be challenged by Rife 's discoveries. And there
would be the powerful attempt by Morris Fishbein and the
AMA to destroy the man whose miraculous treatment they
could not "buy into".
So in retrospect the 1920s seem to be some of Rife's most
frusl mting years as he struggled to find answers. But in
another sense, they were his golden years of what he called
"pure science".
On November 3,1929, the San Diego Union carried a fronl
page artic le titled "Local Man Bares Wonders of Germ Life :'
The article described the wonders Rife could accomplish with
his new microscope. It announced that Rife's "light staining"
method was nearing perfection. The article explained:
"He holds a theory that the harsh acid stains used to bring
out features of the tissue, as well as the complicated treatment
now necessary to prepare it for the slides. conspire to defeat
their own objective.
"He believes that the chemical baths themselves deSifoy the
very genn that science is trying to pin under the microscope .
"So he is evolving a new method that will do away with
chemicals. Instead of five days' hard work being necessary
before a pickled and probably worthless section of tissue can
be put under the lens, he expects within three minutes to place
a perfectly nonnal , undoped slice of the diseased substance in
position for examination.
''The possibilities of this process once it is perfected, he
39
believes are boundless. Medical men who for all time have
been destroying the very thing they were looking for. while
they were getting ready to look at it , may in this one step find
an end to much of human suffering."
The roaring 205 were over. Two weeks before the first
newspaper article , the stock market had crashed. A decade of
depression lay ahead for America. And Rife's fabulous discoveries, inventions, and health miracles would have to contend not only with professional scientific skepticism and a
powerful medical union detennined to control the health
business, but also with the national economic crisis which
made financing research a difficult and complicated challenge.
Yet his primary goal would be accomplished. The cancer
micro-organism would be isolated and destroyed. Tenninally
ill cancer patients would be treated . And they would be healed .
Rife would do what he had set out to do. It would be decades
before his work would be recognizcd. But thc "pure science"
he accomplished meant the deadly BX cancer micro-organism
someday would be "blown up" in those suffering from its
effects.
40
Chapter 6
42
4)
to have a visual power of magnification to 17.000 times, compared wilh 2000 times of which the ordinary microscope is
capable, Dr. Kendall said he could see the typhoid bacilli in
the filterable or fonnerly invisible stage. II is probably the first
time the minute filterable (virus) organisms ever have been
seen.
'1"he strongest microscope now in use can magnify between
2000 and 2500 times. Dr. Rife, by an ingenious arrangement
of lenses applying an entirely new optical principle and by
introducing double quartz prisms and powerful illuminating
lights, has devised a microscope with a lowest magnification
of 5,000 limes and a maximum working magnification of
17,000 times.
'The new microscope, scientists predict, also will prove a
development of the first magnitude. Frankly dubious about the
perfection of a microscope which appears to transcend the
limits sel by optic science. Dr. Johnson's guests expressed
themselves as delighted with the visual demonstration and
heanily accorded both Dr. Rife and Dr. Kendall a foremost
place in the world's rank of scientists."
Five days later, the Los Angeles Times published a photo
of Rife and Kendall with the microscope. It was the first time
a picture of the super microscope had appeared in public. T he
headline read, "The World's Most Powerful Microscope."
Meanwhile, Rife and Kendall had prepared an article for
the December 1931 issue of California and Westem Medicine.
"Observations on Bacillus Typhosus in its Filtrable State"
described what Rife and Kendall had done and seen. The journal was the official publication of the slate medical associations of California, Nevada and Utah.
lbe prestigious Science magazine then carried an article
which alerted the scientific community of the entire nation.
lbe December 11, 1931 Science News supplement included a
section titled, "Filtrable Bodies Seen With The Rife Microscope." The article described Kendall's filtrable medium culture, the turquoise blue bodies which were the filtered fonn
of the typhoid bacillus, and Rife's microscope. It included the
following description:
''The light used with Dr. Rife's microscope is polarized, that
i~, it is passing through crystals that stop atl mys except those
44
vibrating in one particular plane. By means of a double reflecting prism built into the instrumenl , it is possible to turn this
plane of vibration in any desired direction, controlling the
illumination of the minute objects in the field very ellactly."
46
47
Chaplcr 7
49
52
Chapter 8
56
58
Chapter 9
62
65
Chapter 10
68
69
Chapter II
78
enced people which were doomed from the outset, and ignored
the larger goal which Rife was achieving-the cure of cancer
in human beings.
Sometime in the spring of 1936, Johnson closed his clinic
at the Santa Fe Hospital. The results had been impressive, but
he wanted to pause because of the improvements being made
in the Frequency Instrument and then open the third clinic in
the fall of 1936.
On April 28, 1936. Dr. Harry Goodman. an eye special ist.
wrote to Johnson describing the effect of the Frequency InsO umen! on Mrs. Julia M. Gowdy. She had been examined previously on March 23. A little more than a month later, her
vision had improved 29% in one eye and 10% in the other.
"It had been difficult for her to read the telephone book but
now she gets the numbers rather quickly," Goodman reported.
In September, Dr. James Couche of San Diego, who had
witnessed the first cancer clinic at the Scripps Ranch in 1934,
began conducting a clinic with the help of Jack Free. Rife 's
assistant. They treated cancer and senilc cataracts. While the
records are incomplete. the first three were cancer patients and
according to Couche's notes. all completely recovered.
Also in September, Dr. Milbank Johnson opened his third
clinic in the Pasadena Home for the Aged. The clinic lasted
until May 1937. Johnson's description of his success and the
incredible medical events he was witnessing were preserved
in copies of letters he sent to Dr . Gruner in Canada and to Dr.
Meyer in San Francisco just before the year ended.
To Gruner. Johnson wrote. "The clinic is held three mornings a week. Tuesday. Thursday and Saturday. Yesterday I
had eighteen patients. Among them were two cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, three cases of carcinoma, two cases of
chronic varicose ulcers of the leg, and sundry other cases of
more or less definite infection origin. .. I certainly wish
you were here 10 work with me because I am afraid that even
you, who know what we are trying to do, will not believe
some of the yams that I would have to tell you as to what is
occurring in that clinic without actually see ing them yourself."
To Dr. Meyer. Johnson reported :
'"At limes the results of the Ray are absolutely astounding.
79
80
Chapter 12
tee's work. He would later side with the AMA , keeping quiet
about the suppression and accepting the AMA's highest
award, but in 1937 he joined Johnson in the front lines.
In late December 1936 and early 1937, Dr. Johnson and
Dr. Dock had long converstions with Dr. Charles Martin ,
former Dean of McGiJl University in MOnlreal. Their purpose
was to convince rum that Dr. Gruner had to join Rife. Martin
returned to Canada after his talks with Johnson and Dock.
There Martin attempted to have McG ill University pay for
Gruner to work for several months in the Rife Laboratory . But
Martin failed. The Depression went into a frightening second
stage in 1937-38. Money was limited. And those in Montreal
who were opposed to Gruner' s findings were not willing to
support financially a project which could result in even more
findings to their dislike. Gruner later was assigned two laboratory associates who were convinced "monomorphisls." Thus,
his work in proving pleomorphism and particularly the cancer
etiology was obstructed, if not actually sabotaged.
It is important to recognize that many of the men involved
in the Rife work were doctors and researchers. They were not
men who fought political battles and in many ways they crumbled when they were challenged by determined political
power. They believed in scientific procedures. Even today in
the mid- I98Os, men and women of similar good will and naIvete conduct the research procedures. In discussing the Rife
cancer cure with such people, it is common to hear top men
in physics , microscopy and cancer research state. "Suppression of a cancer cure in the 19305 is impossible. Scienlists
would have known about it. It couldn't be covered up." The
truth is that the cure for cancer was covered up. And the
naivete of cancer researchers as well as scientists in related
fields persists to modem times.
The question now is , what will they do when they learn the
facts in this report? A related question is. how courageous will
the American free press be? Only time will tell .
In February i937 , while still anempting to arrange Dr.
Gruner's transfer to San Diego , Johnson wrote to Canada' s
most esteemed cancer researcher, Dr. Edward Archibald. In
the course of the lengthy leiter , Johnson explained the Com-
82
Johnson that "you will nor be able to get him (Gruner) for the
present." Martin then wrote that he and his wife were leaving
on a vacation 10 Italy. The cure for cancer could wail.
Unfonunately, Gruner never was able to go 10 San Diego.
Rife continued a correspondence with him, and Johnson later
sent Gruner his own Frequency Instrument-onc of the finest
then in ex.istence. But Ihis was afler the AMA had closed
down mosl of the treatments. Gruner became (00 frightened
10 use it. He gave the Frequency Instrument to a priest who
was a ham operator, and one of the greatest technologies of
the 20th century ended up being used as spare pans for a
shon-wave radio!
Meanwhile. the difficulties were mounting. Rife had to visit
Louisville, Kentucky again in May 1937 because of continued
problems with his eyes. In April. Dr. Walker of the Hooper
Foundation had to quit the work because of illness. Another
doctor was assigned, but he accomplished nothing . The San
Francisco research was essentially finished by mid-1937.
Johnson reponed thai the San Francisco surgeons had proved
totally uncooperative. In the year and a half that Walker
worked, he was able to get only "5 or 6 tumors" from his
surgical colleagues.
On May 28, 1937, Dr. Milbank Johnson closed the third
clinic. On June I , he wrote to his friend Dr. Joseph D. Heitger
in Louisville, Kentucky. Ihe eye specialist to whom he had
sent Rife:
"I closed my clinic on May 28, having been running it for
eight months. Our special effort this past winter has been
working on cataracts. and while we have treated a number of
other infectious conditions (if cataract is an infeclion). still our
principal work has been on the eye.
''The application of the Rife Ray as we have used it, docs,
in the great majority of cases. restore the fuJI visual function
of the eye; that is, the portion of visual disturbance due to
opacities in the lens. How il does il and why it does it, I do
not know , bUlthe above statement is an actual fael. supported
now by many cases.
"How I wish we could get together and go over this work.
I believe it will result in epochal changes in the profession's
handling of cataract cases."
S4
85
Chapter 13
88
Angeles. When the offer was refused, expensive legal assistance from Los Angeles suddenly was made available to Philip
Hoyland.
Hoyland felt he wasn't getting his fair share. Having
worked with Rife in building the instruments, he began seeing
Cullen. Dr. Couche and the promoter Hutcheson as less important than he. Cullen had used his money to form the corporation. Each member had received 6,000 shares. But Hoyland
had the information on the frequencies and tried to use it to
gain more shares. Dissatisfied and in disagreement with his
partners. he joined forces with the AMA to destroy or lake
over Beam Ray. His law suit was a naked maneuver to gain
control of Beam Ray. By owning Beam Ray, he'd have been
in a position to negotiate with Fishbein or any other outsider
trying to "buy in."
The trial in 1939 destroyed Rife, led to the disintegration
of Beam Ray. stopped the Special Research Committee's carefully developed program and ended most of the clinical work
which was healing cancer and other diseases.
89
Chapter 14
he made me acquainted with the department of research bacteriology and I had a very interesting discussion with those
who are trying to unveil the mystery of filter-passing.
pathogenic micro-organisms .
"At this point I was impressed with a very unusual and
inconsistent spectacle. At least 10 tremendous buildings that
have their upper extremities somewhere in the clouds make up
the series of institutions known as the medical center. I was
awe-struck by the gigantic proportions of the struclUres. the
nurses, patients. and what not that milled and pushed through
the halls-Great God-what a mad-house ... and on the fifth
floor. in a little room, out of the way. I beheld the department
of bacteriology (research). I swear. Dr. Rife. that the whole
laboratory would fit nicely in our dark room, and still leave
sufficient space in which to do our developing . It brought to
my mind what you ha\'e said many times about how badly the
important work is neglected .
"The people at work in the lab were engaged in the process
of inoculating something into fertile chickcn cggs, but were
good enough to take the time to explain that they were working
on the virus of the cold and the 'flu.' Dr. Carscarden, at this
point, announced that I was taking a microscope to England
that would reveal these virus form s. He was promptly
informed by one of the chief technicians that such a thing was
a myth. or words to that effect.
"In the meantime I noticed a copy of Kendall' s Bacteriology
lying on the desk. I picked it up and asked if those assembled
thought the author of that book knew anything about the subject. and in the same breath. spread out a reprint of Kendall's
(and your) article in the California and Westem Medicine, and
also a copy of Rosenow 's publication in the Mayo Bulletin .
.After this was read aloud by one of the group, the atmosphere was changed quite a little and I noticed that they all
stopped working to see what else I had to say-which was
plenty. When I got through, anyone of them were ready 10
give a right eye or at least a left eye to see the microscope. I
explained that it was impossible at prescnt, but perhaps upon
our retum from England it might be arranged,"
Later that same year, Dr. Gruner of Canada wrote to Milbank Johnson , explaining his frustrdtion s and the reality of the
scienlific ort~oxy dominating Canada. the Rockefeller lnstitute in New York, and the Washington research laboratories:
92
93
see in nature, but is actually demonstrated in the microphotographs in the textbooks themselves. It is clear that the authors
have never unraveled their own photographs, or else they
would see that cocci become bacilli all the time!
"Or. Rife has, of course, the indispensable tool to effect the
proofs. To this day the opticians say that what he did cannot
be done. The people in London, whom I interviewed last year
about it, were very scomful, and brought out the ageold argu
ment about wave lengths (I think Dr. Archibald quietly is
amused at them, too; it is so like the Galileo busi
ness) ... The BX may not be 'ultramicroscopic.' it is just not
seen because the light used does nOI show it up. as Dr. Rife
demonstrated in his laboratory that lime.
"All this goes to show that I myself support Rife's findings
as much as ever. I slill think his instrument is of supreme
value. But even if it were available in many more places, few
there are who will trouble to scrutinise the things they work
with. We established that with few exceptions the people who
work with viruses never look at their material microscopically;
they never look at their tumors except with routine haematox
ylin sections; they certainly never examine the living tissues.
Even the wonderful cinematograph pictures of the Lewi5es
contain the particles we consider etiological. and they never
notice these objects al all-dancing about all over the place,
much like BX-bul the dance does not interest them!"
This inability 10 "see" what is right in front of them is one
of the reasons cancer researchers have failed to find the causc
of cancer (the other reason is the politics involved). In 1983,
the Nobel Prize was awarded to Barbara McClintock for her
work in gene research. A biography of McClintock by Evelyn
Fox Keller titled A Feeling For the Organism describes how
McClintock learned to see in a special way. It is essentially
what Gruner was writing about in 1939. He not only had seen
Rife's work validated but witnessed a myriad of researchers
who could have seen something similar without Rife's aid-if
they had looked. Keller describes how Nobel Prize winner
McClintock and other first class scientists looked and "saw"
in a special way:
'"For all of us, our concepts of the world build on what we
sec, as what we see builds on what we think. Where we know
more, we see more ...
94
98
99
Chapter 15
104
105
107
Chapter 16
was the same-a genuine cure for cancer in place of the failed
"approved treatments" of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.
The key person in the succeeding generation's discovery of
the cancer micro-organism was Dr. Virginia Wuerthele-Caspe
(Wuerthe was her maiden name and Caspe the name of her
first husband). With her second marriage to Dr. Livingston.
she changed her name to Dr. Virginia Wuerthele-CaspeLivingston. After her third marriage, she was known as Dr.
Virginia Livingston-Wheeler. To avoid confusion, the name
Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler will be used here even if the
period cited is prior to her taking that name.
In the sununer of 1947, the year following the closing
of Rife's laboratory, while living on the East Coast. Dr.
Livingston-Wheeler began studying tumors and found the
same organism in all of them. In 1948, she came across the
work of Dr. Eleanor Alexander-Jackson who, according to
Livingston-Wheeler, had demonstrated that the tubercle bacillus went through many changes. (This was the same discovery
Kendall, Rosenow and Rife had shown in the early 1930s, but
it had been forgotten.)
Dr. Livingston-Wheeler was fascinated by a bacterium that
"could be so wildly pleomorphic." She began seeking the same
changes in her cancer organism.
In March 1948, at a symposium with Dr. Roy M. Allen, a
microscopist, Dr. Livingston-Wheeler announced her findings. In August 1948, the New York Microscopical Society
Bulletin published the paper. It included the following:
"In conclusion, it may be stated that a definite mycobacterium is observed in many kinds of tumors. lis presence
within the tumor cells as well as within the blood or the
patients suffering with the
dilloCa.~C
can be demonstrated."
Diego Union of July 31, 1949 reported Gruner's opinion of
the latest discovery:
"Gruner !Old Dr. COliche he was satisfied thai Dr. Rife 's
large microscope ... had revealed a virus. He said further
thtlt the work he did with Rife at his Point Lorna laboratory
and follow-up researches al McGill University. had confinned
that tumorous growths positively could be produced by the
virus discovered in San Diego.
"Gruner disclosed that he had bee.n WOrking with Dr. J . E.
Hett of Windsor, another cancer specialist, who has been
studying malignant growths for 50 years and had found that
Hen was having remarkable success with a serum he had
developed from a virus.
" In San Diego yesterday Dr. Rife admiltcd the possibility
that the cancer virus reported in New York and the virus
developed by Dr. Heu are the same virus he isolated in San
Diego.
Dr. Rife said .... " discovered that the virus
organism gets in the blood of the victim at one stage of the
growth.'
"Dr. Couche said ... that if cancer is a blood disease it is
carried to all parts of the body in the blood stream and surgery
. It will surely be a great honor for
would be of liule use.
that patient San Diego investigator, Dr. Rife. if his virus turns
out to be the entity chiefly re.~ponsible for causing this dread
disease."
116
II.
119
Chapter 17
The Victims
Perhaps a word here about the human victims is nceded.
Statistics don't tell the true story of what individual human
beings suffered because Roy Rife's discoveries were suppressed, because the AMA was guarding its pocket book, because
the pharmaceutical companies had "chemotherapy" to push
for profit, because the American Cancer Society was a big
money public relations fraud, because the fDA was owned by
the cancer monopolies, because the media was silent, silent ,
silent.
Two accounts tell the talc. These stories can be multiplied
by millions and millions.
Dorothy Lynch of Dorchester, Massachusetts died of
cancer. She tried so hard to learn about alternative therapies.
But the cancer establishment pushed her into all the traditional
methods. Dorothy wrote a book about her long, terrible voyage through the cancer wards. Her husband Eugene Richards
took pictures of her during the ordeal and also pictures of
others on the same hellish path. Exploding Imo Life is a visual
and word portrait showing how Fi shbein, Ri vers, Rhoads,
the bosses of the American Cancer Society-and all the cowards who might have stood up but didn 't- have murdered and
maimed.
The other cancer book which is a testament to America's
holocaust is The Great Planet Swap and Other Stories. It was
wrillen by 9 year old Mark Johnson of La Crosse, Wisconsin.
It includes stories of a boy with cancer and his hospital experiences until he finall y went home. Only Mark didn 't go home .
He died of leukemia after "battling" it and the chemotherapy
121
122
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
along with engineering data, research records and repon.s, piclUres off the wall, private letters . invoices, tape recordings.
and electronic PaIlS- ali without a search warrant.
They smashed all the research which had been put together
over to laborious years. As in 1939. they visited the doctors
who were experimenting with thc machines and forced them
to abandon them. They also pressured ordinary citizens who
had begun experimenting on a personal basis .
These visits were made by teams of investigators. "Onc
woman was scared so bad that she has been in a sanitarium
driven entirely out of her mind. Her husband cursed them out
and told them to get off his property and has threatened to
exterminate them should they return. His wife has undergone
shock treatments and two months of hospitalization."
The records and materials :!)'eized were 1101 allowed 10 be
used by Cmlle in his OW" defense during his Irial.
Roy Rife, almost 73 and incapable of suffering the abuse
of another trial at his age, went into hiding in Mexico . HiJ
deposition was not permitted to be introduced at the trial.
Neither were the medical and scientific reports from the 1930s
and 1940s. Nor were medical reports from Dr . Stafford in
Ohio. Dr. Couche's letters were also declared inadmissable.
No medical or scientific report which indicated the Frequency
Instrument worked as represented was permittcd to be introduced at the trial. Crane was left naked with only the paticnts
who had been cured or helped.
The trial was held in early I % I. After 24 days, and despitc
thc testimony of 14 patients who told how the Frequency
Instrument cured ailments and diseases which orthodox
medicine could not alleviate, Crane was found guilty. The
only medical opinion offered by the State of California came
from Dr. Paul Shea who had been given a Frequency Instrumcnt by the Public Hea1th Department for 2 months before the
trial. Shea admitted he never tried the Frequency Instrument
on anything or made any tests to evaluate it. He simply
exam ined it and decided that it had no curati ve powers and
didn't lend itself to investigative use.
Also, and most disturbing , the foreman of the jury was an
AMA doctor. Everyone else was carefully screened to see that
131
"usefulness," Rife and Crane could not patent their discoveries. The actions by the defenders of medical orthodoxy
stymied every attempt Rife and Crane made to bring the cure
for cancer to the general public .
Rife had obtained a patent on a microscope lamp in 1929.
but that was before the threat he represented to the orthodox
medical (and scientific) establishment was recognized. By the
middle and late '60s, Rife had witnessed or learned about: (I)
the spectacle of the AMA crushing his discoveries in 1939 and
forcing doctors to abandon them even when numerous cancer
cures were on record; (2) the mysterious death of Dr. Milbank
Johnson in 1944, apparently just when he was preparing to
make an announcement about cancer being curable; (3) the
strange theft of the prism from the Universal Microscope just
after the article on the microscope and curing cancer appeared
in the Smithsonian Institution report ; (4) the hopeful revitalization of the 1950s under Crane's direction-crushed in the 1960
travesty of justice when all research was confi scated and scientific reports were forbidden to be introduced at the trial ; and
(5) the mid-1960s attempt at legitimization and the way the
medical authorities again had pressured researchers and health
practitioners to quit.
Rife would be 80 years in May 1968. He had fought his
last war. He knew he was unlikely to see his Frequency Instruments or his microscopes used to heal virus-caused diseases.
And he was uncertain about the protracted exchanges with the
Patent Office which lay ahead , especially when the issue of
" usefulness" was a Catch-22 situation for which there was no
obvious solution . Medical treatment had to be approved by
medical and scientific authorities. Every time such men
appeared and offered Rife and Crane help, the medical powers
crushed them or forced them to give up Rife-associated
research or treatment.
So on March 4 , 1968, Royal R. Rife signed ownership of
his microscope over to John F. Crane, indicating that he
intended to patent it and that John Crane would own all rights.
Rife considered the Frequency Instruments to be joint inventions because of all the original work that both Rife and Crane
had done on them.
134
-' Those who have a genuine need to contact Barry Lynes may write
to him at:
27758 Santa Margarita Parkway. Suite 228.
Mission Viejo, California,
USA 92691
136
Selected Bibliography
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 174,
October 30, 1970.
Beale , Morris: Super Drug Story. Columbia Pub . ,
Washington. D.C., 1949.
- -: Medical Musso/inf, Columbia Pub ., Washington,
D.C., 1939.
Benison, Tom: Tom Rivers: Reflection on a Life ill Medicine
and Science. MIT Press , Cambridge , Ma ., 1967.
Bird , Christopher: "What Has Become of the Rife Microscope?" New Age Journal. Boston , March 1976.
Brown, Raymond K.: AIDS, Cancer and the Medical Establishment. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles , 1986.
Cantwell , Alan, Jr.: AlDS: The Mystery and 'he Solution.
Aries Rising Press , Los Angeles, 1983 .
Comer, George: History of Rockefeller Institute /901-1953.
Rockefeller Institute Press , New York , 1964.
Crane , John: A Study of Electron Therapy. John F. Crane
Corp., San Diego , 1978 .
Cullen, Ben, transcript of interview , October 15, 1959.
Oominigue, Gerald J.: Cell Wall Deficient Bacteria. AddisonWesley, Reading, Ma., 1982.
"Fi ltrable Bodies Seen With The Rife Microscope," ScienceSupplement, Science. December II , 1931.
"Giant Microscope May Yield Secrets of Bacteria World ,"
Los Angeles Times, June 26, 1940.
Gruner, D.C.: Study of Blood in Cancer. Renouf, Montreal ,
1942.
137
List of Appendices
A.
8.
C.
D.
E.
Appendix A
.. ' L . . . ...... 01. . . . 0 .. . " . 0 .
1I0,.-.ber 9, 1931
S.tu~.y
---
"" d ".".,.
143
Appendix B
The Doctor's Gathering-Nov 193 1
144
Appendix C
Appendix 0
ftHS~5 If!:
146
~,dlllftl
Appendix E
" H .... NN "OI""OM , M. D.
_
'-01 .....
~L&' .
"'........
0 .... ' ..
I ull.t
:rou
t<o.,..
boo,,, ..,
"'lW1r.
t.o
fov
Wl>Ille: _ I c\ll!.erf\>l
eoabl.JlaUoa. &Z>d ....,. Ifl'I:I that. " U " , I 7<:JUr
..,h .,.. would "artaJ..Dl,. boo
<>l1li.
I ..
tbh letter M"I"" :rou ....,
bMr hoa hia d1r-,ct. aDI! you _111 know wht.t
1t. it all abcnrt.
Hn<iu.c ,.""
s...n
147
...u
Appendix F
148
(1'1])
Appendix G
149
Appendix H
150
Appendix I
.. ,I. .....u .oOHH.OH , 1'1. 0.
~ d .....
Dorlar.
lien Saw..s..y.
=-
.. h.:>\n. ill:\-)
In bait
Yours ... ..,.
'-pv.f'
...---.. .............
.."
s.....
-...
151
Appendi x J
'.1.n.. TtdWc of ''UX" l!!oc!!lrtl09
o..r metllo>d d loocu1at101o at
...... r. t l " fo~.:
_rl~utol
The ODlmoll. n ...1 unod ond IterlUud wlUl aJ,oolool Mel to,"'" ooLIIlI",,", .
\lie pollll 01 llIOCU!oll_ on:! pl....t ladl"
I... TW .......1Ib 1o*J)eeUOC
!he anI_ to.1ooek.. Aa """'. 10.... , yo,..,. .moll...ul II ueo!. 1'be 0IHdl. I,
fL1I8I! wltIl oU.I .. pel.ol.,.... )ell)' _ ~r ..... c I.
nuOl<! willi u.. ~,.hLl"
""" tIoo .-dI. pllOOed .... 1M 'JTI~.
_ I . II , ...
I... tIt.oa SO_
from
pol .... of ~.Iom -...:Ie. tM ",lde. . l.. 'l1Ie poillt dl_,.JatI.1 t. 11:1
_ I eu. Ihe "'.... ""',..,. ,hnd lor Ihe _
til. tb<t " aX " ,,,,,,,Lv",,,
,"-yo
1m .. OIl ""ulu.llled ~ ........ l>n_1 "'....
,,_01 __
u....
..w ..
n.o
u..
w_
, .. S to .. dOlT'
leJIoJI _
....
_
ODd Ib, ''5X'' LI 011:019 recovcud III. 011 .UU,
,.. 1 _..10Dl 1"",lor aa:I cbooek II 10 moll. M I. ." 10 I ..... pl~ 'ro ... m.
n ll" ....p)""U arc mode "' U """. Inw ...I, Jllto
or1il"ol "K" ",oodiL TIlll loe.u... !lie ,'1 ....1..... &lid IPHdllho , .0 ... 11> of
\.~c 'U"",'. WIlli tben up.rlmeDt. llIot hi b.... rllpnt.ed Oil o~.r 100 '>;HIrlou",oI
"",,,,oil .......... convl""ed l.bolWI metllo>d delll.lle\J' pl"O~" III. ~lru.I."". and
potholoi>l' of "OX" vinas.
U llI. .e ...... ""J ,"o.ke ... 'our ted II IoU""",,,, WI "",!Wo . ....... I\llu",,"b doom
..!tll 1II.lorMula of "K """'10 &lid In of \.b<! b .. 1e ,rl""lpl'. 1 .-ol~o<I. _eve,. It I.
boyo<d th _
01 the ltree mlcr ... _
10 vlluoll.' til... mI .... , 1"".
1"1>0 """,01 " ..... 01. "...,.,. II _ r _ t o l 01\1 ... 01. ee ..........11lI doo .... _ 0 ....
I'--""J tUlnl1nftl . To olto1o _ . . . \oIaadiac ......nl. 110", ud '--'10111 ,roc...
1I1t.ned to dete.mI .. lH ,reelM M1:U.. ollH fr"",DC)'
.01 U.I. II lH
_rtol
of 11>11 ............... tile
t. foWld . It II npellWd 10
00""",,,11',, 11m.. titer tile treqaeDOJ W"""",*,,, b .. "-' p\",,~ b""k to tbo 1_'
lett!", before.
1.---,. II ....... rded. n... r ..vJ. ...... "'e..od .....:lor
1M hi", power of tbo 1&IIl ..... oImI"l'OIoope MId _
tbo _nol ooc:!Uato..,. rull
..-. u... "BXH fa.ma
to "8\0>01 \/pH
d111.1IIeft1te III u.. fl.kI. 1"1>0
1-"'04ed ""'mol...... tho" '~'"'"tod to 1M ""- f .....". to d",.1IDla. If tbo oi'f""t
1. IM. _ _ u.. '1lX~ YI"", 1.0. u.. t l I I _ of 1M nptttml\d.oIlIIJ. ... oI.. no
u.ul.. ore p.K'"\J' Idftlllcol -.lu. _rl....ul IIIIlIUlo .. "'IU. u.. pu,r. CIIlwrl
11ldeo: _
..,.. ... .,<11 _Ill _ .. ooodJO:Md ....... 400 II_I -.1111
""' ... m boCeto IQJ" _ - ' ..... mod. 10 <II" IiIl.lnq... IICJ 04 _ ... " .. n of
_u...,..,. .l1li.
ope<:If'"
.ecu",
_ar
1>01.,._
o.
_r_1I.
" ....1"".....
n.. [itlt clllll,,01 wort Q;II e_r"'U oomplcttd.....:ltt III _ ... IaW of
Dr. I4Ilbllll< Jolomaa M. D....MeI> '1'01 I," lIP "'1<10 lpedal ....:lieol R ....,~
Call1.tOJuelof 1M UIOl ...""]", 01. 5o~U.u. C",hfor"U. 18 eu.. weto .. e~od ~
\he "Ullle for ", __ !)'pel 01 "'olJp....".. After l 1DCNIIba. It 01 tbo .....-c:oIlod
Ioope\e. . . .nl were lipod oU .. "lIl11"oUJ o.... ~ bJ 1M lulf of tho ....&011.
<lacto... IZId Or. A\vI.o. G. Fcord. K. D. PlIlIoloclot tor
TIle tn"""".1a
""U!lttd at 3 mllutu d .... o1Io .. 1111"41 the tr_.DC)' I.. t.nunollt .. hleb. w . . . .t ""
the ""'rto1 olelU_1")" tlloO {er ''BX'' or elllCe r (.01 3 dq lAter.m). It ..... {"WId
lIoot lIIe cl_ed 11",. be .... _
treolme .... oltol ... ~ttet .uulla tII. ... \he .....
.. iliaci doily. lbJllI.e tII.'lJ'mpalle Ir'''''' ... opportWII.,. \.0 oboorb ....:l lui
aU I to:llo oo.adiUoo ... .blc~ II prod""ed bJ III. d 1\01'.~ dlld p ... UclH _Ibe
u.o ,......,.
152
''llX" '1ruo. No . toe <>I. body laIIpor.a1u;r. . . . pe~I.obI' ~ IUI)I of rII ~ ....
tboc .... ",.a! d"'-!"C or of"'r u.. frll'qlXl>C)' ! ... ~ tl".....1Il.. No apec:Ja!
d.& ... .... n _
[D uq of thI. cliolul
bvt we .1""...1,J 1>911,,. 11101. P";Il>u
<ilft ""q>1Ie:1 fer tIoe lod'yldtlol .....u ~ of bGIIril l .
_.It.
w. """ deUraw.. iA,.... " " of tIoe " .... of pe ....... h,1", "atc!....... by
u.. a:amllt..Ollca of blcocl 1_" ronl!!. tIoc Lr<:lIDle lit ...".,.. _IOI.DOd) ID SO
Il0l............. u,. aIM , _ III. !. "'aq In>" of op!II>ooUO .... I!!. D. oan:tacm.
1.1.."" o"rl. . Ill> eo,,,b.ctlyll)' wilt!. pe chl..... ,oh"O ...
wbJcb nobl.e. ... 10
"<d1iDo &.Ild d".umtA. the Ioc.w.- 01. ~ 1I1lD<>. . .1 \hood I.be .... of J(.It'IJ pIoo .......... .
Ie ~ alae be<. dete.mlDOd I.bal ...y e ... of ",aU1UDC1 uuUd w!1lI
X It"
..,,,.or
"eM,
0' .0.:11"", or other ndlo-cU lIlo.erlm abc>w. dtc!de:l ",d.&o-cUvlly &.Ild Iou",fill Ua.oUl! dI.,.ta fo. muq "",1Ith.o ... te. III. lnall".",U hye ben
o.tttoyed
u...... or 1I .."" ....tII b .. be ... b.r1lMd !a DAWfa! p""llia I...l. w. loa... aI.to
101III<I til. 11.1"",,.. truted .. Ith Ihl. lIlelllol1 pood 1... re.dll,J lO"'e tn.",....1 "'-
,!.....
OW" f~
>.tnzmecta.
153
Appendix K
..
(AI DI_u"tkn" . . . . . . c,,",i~C
I. 8.-
(BeaJ._ C, iIU
11_1 . . . C, ~ der1Y~ C,
3.
AMbr",,_
~
"1"',
IICIIJ
- CH HI , '
..od 110 ptep ... _
""ladl,.. _
'0
_0
154
It
' r. I 'j~3!1
i~JI:~=J~.Ji~.b~
J~~
{j'r"
,
I
;t7 1
-'I
><
'6
c
...:
I
'"
:';l~
~.
Ii
no,
;I I
II
u'"
-',
'!-:'
~:.:I
-:' J
I'"
;"~':!l'
.11'
. ~ .3 1~
I I 1.--1 ""
I"
f"?J;;~,to:b~h.:i
II
I'
~i
ji
j'"1 ,ftjl!.I'>'
.:.d
::
t" 1
- 1-....
I'll 11-!1 "," ,,,--.J,,,,;,, 1 ,
Jlj.l
.ll'I~'P ''l!i'I'e'=I'
, ,0' " "''~j ~l- II, .
.l ' " 1'I
'11 ,_ P... ;:d!1..1
... -. ..
I:
d .. ~
~!h
~..
~ ~~a
1~'<I..
H~I""'j.~&."'.j'li"
.~.Il'l J:!~
::- ,
~
~s,~.;t
i:~
J'
t
~
1'1 Ii
il l, C'l_l!h~l'!ll'~
a .!I
I ..
,'I:!=h.,,!'
.. . t ., .
It
!1:li11J.,lfl"
1'~':".""i~1 1- '
','I J" -I j,l" -.,
'-I"'" 'I -j ,1
~,
~al'l
I' II
II
.3~~~~S
,!,,.~lh"'Il.
.....
"I~ .. t '1
I
II. ;
1 H,1
,;J.",!H;"lh
jfJ!~'(!-J-'
,lhlfllU,il
;.1
Appendix M
.. ,I. ......... 0 ..... 0 ..... D.
~c,~"
lacIo.t"'-
)'0\1
ori11 t1D4
r....
"'t
u..,. ....
,.(08
ao:elM,uo~UI .
,.t
e&lI
s.n
DieIO. Call!.
-_.-..
.............
-~-
156
Appendix N
" '~ .A""
L . .. .......... _
.... , ..
~ ' . lNi
-..c
,l..aa4...
lo .. ~. on. ~ palp&llle
10M lett "lei....... ..u.r t..II&A ......
~ .... J.prU I/iI MOl 110\ po.1.atul..
1t
.~ ~
'1,0\
157
Appendix 0
Dr.
111ft
12.
Sejlte-ber 12,
19~5
ot the
'Q.I"ie.ble .OIlOC~tiC b . . . .
round
DO
living
tu~rculer
'r"-r
&, ."
w.
158
Appendix N
............... 0 . . . . . 0 00 . .. "-
A".""".,
~~
...... ,..
-a,
.n
_
1" -rr .... ~ . .lll
of u....u _
~. 1D \Iou. I!dO. ot
\boo uek
U ..
~ ~
._I-....dIlon'~ ... OGl.l . . . . .
l&gd _ !lot qliot 01<1., Jut
u..
llanOle, .do ~l ... tIIaD ~ . .
1.. . p&iat\al. floe ~ po.lf*bh rl&lldl ..
\boo :..ott .1d. nr . . u n 1.Ir.u. _ _
u:aa1aed OCI Jprtl It _
. .t po.1AtvJ.. I
th1AI<, __ ...... to - . .............. 401>b.lT
...... u.u .. orUl ,t... """' _t.bw .bo\
So.~ ""tori _
11 it h ."...uL. to
7"'"
U DOt, pl....
I w1U lOOt
brt", bft 4 .....
;>peU_.
.bo....
..u-. .....
~ ~
.~ ~
'1,'
157
Appendix P
.. , .. . ..... '" ... 0 .. .... 0 .... " .D
.UI...
Oc:tobe.r 8. 19!i!i
daM,...
IINl' ClII!rMII.
by .XpOrt....:.,. 11..,.....
ot ...11 whicb I
. . wlait.t.1:>c to 7U tor 7ou:' WUeeUoa.. or .ppro-t.
l1Ddl;r rMd t.b.- 0...... ......,. cautlll..l;r. COMUlt IrIJ'
attorD.,. 70IJ pl.... it 70ll 10 d..aire. &lid l1ttIIrD u...
to . . . . ~t.l7 .. pouibl. . . . . ' " about ~ to
two t<>rlll
ltart.
w. t.....
.tbll. I ..
---
. _ . .. . n
" ..
0.'.
159
Appendix Q
M IL .... N ..... OWNI O N , M . D
1'. ' .
."Une-,
~~.
or !lOt
,.0\1
CIlII't
u.o .
urar:a:.
Chrl..t..o.. 0IlJd.
' Ubant J
" ". Cho.l.--...
Spe<ltel .edlcal Re..:-clt C<>=.l.tt...
IId'O"erdQ" of Sout.benl Cal.ifonde
Dr. R. B. Rife
0_
o. ~
d.
~"
s....
Dle,o, Cel1foru!e
4 _ 'O
160
Appendix R
.. ' . . . . MK .. OH".OI(, ... . 10.
JI.!NU'7 ., 1131
Je:y
a....
R..,.,
til., ...
I han ho.d .......... 1 .... " ..u U ...... with Dr. ChaTl
V&rth. , to .... ,. 0 ..... of ~oOill Ulli",rdty 111 Ko .. t .... d ....... 10...
b.... alit IMr. tor .. t.., day.. I tried rq belt to pt hl. d ......
to Sa .. 011.;0. tNt 1M 11IIply ooul4 11010 pt t.~. tim to "". 11 __
en ... I had ..nul l"u:rr1_ . t til hi 114 U .. Mollh",. Alll-..
001 Dr . 0",,1<. k - ' .. 1>1, ... IlIoou4e<! iD. nlU", 11111 tilt. 14..
tII.t 1t wo,,14 boo ,004 tilt", tor Dr . Gn..... ,. to boI ....t <Nt h .....
b7 ""'G11l. Dr. x.rtia 10 lUll 0"" th Board of GoT.TII""" of tba
Un.1 ...... ity &nd "'" h.,. ,,!l\!utllkell to do hit T8TY but to
\leG111
to uD4 ,,. Dr. GnI.... ,.. !.!eOill poop", Dr . OruMr' . uluy and u_
pe"'.' . Dr. l.!I.Ttl,. will arri ... b.aJ[ 111l!ollt ..... l by 'tlHo fl.l"It of
hb""",,.,. ."... , 1M lay _ . .y upeot to lI.ar 4,tlllh. d.... lal'_ t . 0"' tIIi' I lIbjtct . Sir !tollh",. t .. lo pr.tty certaill thAt
Dr. G....... r .. 111 be . . ..t.
,.t
)!rl. JobuOIl jcl1u ... 111 ..10111111 ,..,.. .0<1 u.-I. Ufo a
happy atod p""",rOllI . _ T..... .
_...__
P. S .
.-!I,"
-..
~ ........ ",h"
161
Appendix S
...,0'tT _
botore, u..
_II
ba
lone _
flul
DI.~,
I"'nlt. .
ocr O B~B".~
162
""til
Appendix T
--_......---
CH"",-" 1".
TU~Y.
D. 0 .
......-.........-...
....1, liN
dau.
-..,.
DB
.1lIe,
Ill,
u..
no.
cue
'I ,,,,
1&
ot
beMat to aLIlU111d.ad.
163
will be
Appendix U
Rife in 1960
164
Appendix V
617 S. Bur11l\&toll .....
A~F'DAI/'-r
To Who. I t
int,etlon
~7
~h11.
".
LoS1c'11, no ra,,'l'Ch OT 1ntar t 1n Inl
U.l<l
a,p,c1alll In the ba ilins .rt. Ind .cl.ne hould b. ,uppra' a, d.
nn
Jt hli b.,n Itlt.d, I8Il n and Is'ln, that On. I, I =art,T to hi,
pro t ion. SVeh 1 tind tru. in Inl ,..I .. rch Id~.ntvra. It tak
I lot ot COIU'IS'. u ... sonar aDd hard work to t1n4 I1IW _thad, .
I I. ot tb. oplD1on Ind bll1.t that 1t I hIld DOt b.Ad tb.
t,.... ... nt 011 tb. F'rIq1.l.nCl Inatl"W!Int abon that 1 would not be Ihl.
to S.t rId ot t.hl1 IncW!IIbh It:t.ph. IVra1.l1 wh1ch InU-hlotlcl
covld not .vppr
It 1.ft
with II. d.fo ...1CI r1.ght hand .no:! wrllt .lont;
wIth th' I ra In whicb tha dl,tll .r~ ot tb. I'Id111 bo~ ,bow.
p.n.an.nt di,tort.d dl =-6' on ~-r'l .tudl and Obl'T.atlon wh1ch
~. ri<lve.-1 th ttiel.nCl ot th. VI. or thl, hand Ind 'TE lbout
I"lttl p'T-"e.nt.
I &.III SI'Iutlll t.o hau hid th. prI~ll'6' ot thl VII or
th1. In.t~lnt which Ipp.. rl " ,pacltlc tor clrtl1n ~lru,'.
1 1.11 tOT .",. Ind III trai<loll ot "''''l'Cb whir' 11t.,
h .. lth and ~ p pln... Clll hi lJIpTO~~.
II,
. . - . . .. , .. _
165
... -1 ....
Appendix W
Co~ftl,l
In
~ro
Per,
hn!n9
c.ncer Ind was operated on by five M.D.s It tht Sa" 01190 County
Hosplt.l Ind on l brust wl5 reaoyed Ina it was reported that tht
Clncer wlS still In ay body Ind pus drlln'91 WIS seVer t . In HIY 1956
I wu Slv,n t reata ents by the lift Frtquttncy InHruu nt by Dr. JUH
WI.
s uch
wonderful
Gods l nd. It sived .y lIfe! It hi' bl,n twelve yelr. nOw li"c, it .
cured lIy uncer .nd ! give thl. stlttllent under pt n.1tt oHp"erjury
IS
beln~
STATE
O~ CAL!~ORM!A)
(CUMTY OF
S "' ~
O!EGO)(
"
Subscribed , nd Sworn to
be for. II. this 16th day
ATTEST lit
~Ind
t~ls
l&t~
day of
Janulrt. 1968
of hnulrt. !968
MRS. BLAHCHE .H. JO
SM OIEGO
166
In
~ro
per
Appendix X
!,' r , ':
;bl'i~' i-!'rm--t
' ! t ,,~,
j' it~ll
. 1 I ii~~,.....]_
1. "~;'I. !
;: 1 tl
,I
''-i!.1 ., ,I ii, .. .. I i
.fl . -illill I., II
1- I
I ' 1 i' r i
m";' !!'
I-W
iH ~_~
J.,
~",
'Htif~
! ! III j11~'
" I
d~
I
'1 .. '
f; I~r
!f'ffi
'~ 1
,
I-I _'
.
167
I~ ,
II
'
-t
04
j ~" 'I
-:,--, r
I"
ij
,III!~ W
-Ii
i "
I
,fl
ill
Publisher's Note
The evidence set out in this book suggests thai ccnain individuals misused the power of the American Medical Association several decades ago to help suppress the work of Royal
Rife. This is not to imply, however, that the AMA today would
allow itself to be similarly abused. The vast majority of doctors
and surgeons who make up this body are dcdicaled individuals
of the highest integrity, who have commilted themselves and
their energies 10 the saving of lives and the relief of pain. We
honor them, and we are confident that the AMA will reflect
that same dedication by endorsing author Lynes' call to reexam ine Rife's cancer cure in an unbiased light.