Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Electronic Link
http://berrypdr2016.weebly.com
Criteria 1 Reflection
Demonstrated ability to teach effectively and/or perform
effectively in other current assignments.
My expectations were to:
1. Collect student feedback on course texts, content, and teaching
performance throughout course delivery and at the end of the
term.
2. Embed Culturally Responsive and racially conscious teaching
strategies in course syllabi; use working COE working definitions
for Intercultural Competency.
3. Use mobile apps in the process of engaging students.
4. Contribute to departmental goals and initiatives around racial
equity on our Courageous Leadership Conference.
5. Work with the department in implementing our new Experiential
Learning Leadership Certificate
Successes
1. I gathered indications as to how students were responding
through personal communication, and end of term evaluations.
Course evaluations revealed on average high ratings. This was
particularly evident in the fall 2015 doctoral and specialist
classes. I also received a number of emails from students
containing positive feedback about classes.
2. I revised course syllabi and included the COE Culturally
Responsive working definitions. I Included the protocol for
courageous conversations in my course content and class
activities throughout the year. In addition, I allowed alternative
assignments for students in some classes.
3. I used the mobile app Explain Everything in class processes. In
addition, there were some instances that I assigned students to
use google hangout to complete activities.
4. I helped the department organize and produce our 2nd annual
Leading Courageously for Racial Equity conference, securing one
of our keynote speakers and one of the breakout session
presenters.
5. The Experiential Learning Leadership certificate was approved
and the courses are being offered in our program.
What I Learned
Students can be challenged by course content involving culture and
race. I found it helpful to not only be explicit about the equity lens in
Criteria 2 Reflection
Scholarly or creative achievement or research.
My expectations were to:
1. Build upon and refine my research agenda including Critical Race
Theory, Project-Based Learning, and Music and the Arts in
education.
2. Submit proposal for an article for publication in a refereed
journal.
3. Submit proposal to present research related to my research
agenda.
Successes
1. I submitted a co-authored manuscript to the Journal of
Innovations in Higher Education.
2. I submitted a book chapter to an edited book on critical race
perspectives in arts education.
3. I had a peer reviewed creative concert performance selected and
staged, sponsored by the Historical Society.
4. I submitted a proposal and was selected to present at the
National Summit for Courageous Conversations.
5. I submitted a proposal and was selected to present at the MN
Equity in Education Partnership (MnEEP) Conference.
What I Learned
The accepted book chapter proposal has been submitted with
expected comments from the editors in fall 2016. My chapter
focuses on whiteness in advanced level arts programming in high
school. I am building a body of research and work from a CRT lens.
One of my strengths is clearly my ability to engage audiences in a
variety of settings through my creative works, and scholarly writing
and presentations. I believe this continues situate me as a unique
faculty member within educational leadership. My creative work
through composing and getting my work performed in professional
venues is informing my educational leadership practice. This is due
to my lens as a creative scholar, who is growing and gaining more
grounding in CRT as well as intercultural and multicultural
responsiveness. I am understanding how to deepen my integration
of teaching, composing and performing music, facilitating cultural
responsiveness, use of CRT, and research. This will be important for
me as I continue to grow in this area. For example, I have written an article
about interactive theater as a professional development model. Our IRB
application to do focus group research has been approved. The
three conference presentations over the past year indicates a high
interest on my scholarship and ability to deliver relevant research
that contributes positively to the field. I presented along with BIG
students and another COE colleague at the National Summit for
Courageous Conversations; presented with the interactive theater
team at MnEEP; and, I presented at the Pan African Conference.
The connective thread in all three presentations was how CRT can
be a foundation for understanding systemic and structural barriers
and how it can be applied to help uproot and creative the conditions
for organizational change. My historical society concert
performance centered on how African rhythms have transmitted
from West Africa, through the Caribbean, and into the United States.
This historical research and performance helps to demonstrate how
What I Learned
Three BIG students graduated and 6 remaining students all
declared their intentions to return. The multi-level support
seems to be working in this early stage of the program. It was
rewarding to see my advisees pass the various stages of their
programs. My doctoral student passed his research proposal.
Guiding his research requires dedicated time. It is important to
develop a rapport with students and advisees in order to gain
knowledge of their personal interests. This is helpful in helping
them choose research projects, capstone formats, and career
pathways. The presentation at the national summit with BIG
students was a powerful experience for them. They were able to
gain leadership skills and indicated that they learned much more
about systemic issues related to race within education. Both BIG
students graduated. One of them enrolled in our educational
leadership masters program!
Areas for Growth
1. Continue work with Institutional Diversity on building the BIG
cohort model. I would like to have a selection process,
scholarship money for cohort members, and eventually, a BIG
class.
2. Continue working with students to guide their research
interests, and seek opportunities to involve them in
conference proceedings.
Criteria 5 Reflection
Service to the university and community.
My expectations were to:
1. Serve as Intercultural Competency and Development (ICD)
Advisory Board Chair for the College of Education.
2. Lead the CETL Interactive Theater if Isms; develop topics, scripts
and other documents necessary for facilitating this faculty
certificate at MSU.
3. Serve on the Presidents Commission on Diversity.
Successes
1. I chaired the ICD Advisory Board in the establishment of guiding
questions, action steps, and a plan of action document. We
moved forward as a board by working toward systemic
implementation of racial equity within the college.
2. I continued collaborating with Institutional Diversity by
developing a curriculum for BIG Scholars and directing the
program.
3. I facilitated the Interactive Theater of Isms Certificate offered
through CETL.
4. The Interactive Theater of Isms team presented an invited
informance in the Inver Grove Heights school district.
5. I started a new collaboration with the College of Social and
Behavioral Sciences. It will be a common read and joint planning
for PD and student engagement around the book, The New Jim
Crow by Michelle Alexander.
What I Learned