Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Net Sales
Operating Expense
= Operating Profit (or earnings before interest and tax, EBIT)
Taxes
= Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT)
Capital Charges (Invested Capital x Cost of Capital)
= EVA
As we can see from the calculation above, the NOPAT is positive and increasing
from year 1 (2013) to year 3 (2015). This means that PT Telkom had an operating
efficiency. NOPAT gives the profit for a company had it been totally unlevered. It
gives a number which interests only the equity holders. EBIT on the other hand is
a number which interests both debt holders and equity holders. So, to calculate
the NOPAT from EBIT we have to remove the benefit of tax shield. After we
calculate the NOPAT, the next step is to calculate the Invested Capital.
The formula fomula for calculating Invested Capital;
Invested Capital = (Total Debt + Total Equity) Short
Term Debt
Total Debt
x 100
Total Debt +equity
Rd (Cost of debt)
Interest expense
x 100
Total longterm debt
E (Portion of Equity) =
Total equity
x 100
Total debt+ equity
capital ;
From the calculation above, we can see that the WACC is increasing year by year.
After we calculate the WACC, the next step is to calculate EVA. EVA is the
calculation of deduction of NOPAT and capital charges. Capital charges itself, is
from the multiply of Invested capital and WACC. The calculation of PT Telkoms
EVA is as follows;
From the calculation above, we can see that on the year 2013, the EVA has a
positive result, that is Rp 1.928 but the second year (2014) the EVA turned into
negative amount, that is minus Rp 3.600 and so that the third year (2015) the
EVA is negative for minus Rp 15.647. jangan lupa jelasin yg kurang dr 0 besar dr
0 dll.
From the calculation above, we can see that the growth of PT Telkom is
increansing from year 1 (2013) to year 3 (2015). And for the next year after
2015, I assume that the growth will be constant for 14,24%. And the tax income,
I assume the tax in Indonesia is 25%. So the pro forma for the next five years are
as follows ;
The EVA for the year 2004 and 2005 is negative i.e. (633.4) (690.02) which mean
its earningwere less than the cost of capital. Also the trends for the ROI and ROE
are justified by the positive trend of EVA.
The values of the EVA for the consecutive years are decreasing this fluctuating
trend indicateinconsistency in operation efficiency. The EVA and ROE trend is
positive but investing based onthe trend of ROI can mislead the investing
decision. Further the trend of EVA is increasing butthe increase is less significant
as in case of TATA MOTORS.