1 REB500 BBP Algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 1
2009-04-09
Sub-System BBP
REB500
ABB
Content

2009-04-09
Content:
Decentral busbar protection; application
Signal extension of peak-current and protection algorithm
Tripping time
Results of simulations
Summary
ABB
Application
Fast selective protection of busbars in
HV, MV and EHV substations
Protection of outdoor, indoor and GIS switchgear

2009-04-09
Protection of
single busbar
double busbar
triple busbar
quadruple busbar
with or without transfer bus
Installation in
solidly grounded networks
isolated networks
current limiting grounded
networks
ABB
Busbar-Protection algorithm
Measurement
IL1
Phase segregated
Selective per bus-zone

2009-04-09
IL2
IL3
IL0
ABB
System Capacity
Maximum numbers of Bay Units: 60
maximum numbers of protection zones: 32

2009-04-09
Example:
busbars
zones
1
2
3
4
transfer bus
ABB
Evaluation of current data
I
0

2009-04-09
-5
10
20
30
40
50
60 ms
ABB
Evaluation cycles
n
I
0
-5
10
20
30
40
50
60 ms

2009-04-09
Data window n
I
ABB
n+ 1
Evaluation cycles
n
I
0
-5
10
20
30
40
50
60 ms
Data window n

2009-04-09
8 ms
Data window n + 1
ABB
n+2
n+ 1
Evaluation cycles
n
I
0
-5
10
20
30
40
50
60 ms
Data window n

2009-04-09
8 ms
Data window n + 1
Data window n + 2
ABB
Primary current
I1
I1
I2
I1
I1

2009-04-09
I2
I2
I2
I1
I2
ABB
Secondary
current
I1
I1
I2
I1
I1

2009-04-09
I2
I2
I2
I1
I2
ABB
Fundamental
frequency
component
I1
I1
I2
I1
I1

2009-04-09
I2
I2
I2
I1
I2
ABB
Peak current
signal extension I1
I1
I2
I1
I1

2009-04-09
I2
I2
I2
I1
I2
ABB
I1
I1
I2
I1
I1

2009-04-09
I2
Reconstructed
current signal
I2
I1
I2
I2
ABB
Current data and preprocessing in the Bay Unit
DSP
A/I
S/H
MUX
A/D
Max
DIG

2009-04-09
I2
ABB
Two independent protection algorithms

Stabilized current differential algorithm
Comparison of current directions (phase comparison)

2009-04-09
&
Decision
ABB
External Fault
IIDiff
Diff
kk==
IRest

2009-04-09
II11==5kA
5kA
==
| In |
| In |
||55++55-10
-10||
== 00
kk ==
||55||++||55||++ |-10
|-10||
II22==5kA
5kA
II33==-10
-10kA
kA
ABB
Internal Fault
IIDiff
Diff
kk==
IRest

2009-04-09
II11==5kA
5kA
II22==5kA
5kA
II33==00kA
kA
==
| In |
| In |
||55++55+0
+0||
== 11
kk ==
||55||++||55||++ ||00||
ABB
IIDiff
Diff
External Fault
kk==
IRest
==
| In |
| In |
||55++55--22||
== 0,67
kk ==
0,67
||55||++||55||++ ||-2
|
-2 |

2009-04-09
II11==5kA
5kA
II22==5kA
5kA
II33==-2
-2kA
kA
Current transformer saturation !
ABB

k= 1
k= 0,85
Differential current
IDiff
na
r
te
n
I
ul
a
F

2009-04-09
No Fault
Ikmin
0
Restraint Current IRest
ABB
Two independent protection algorithms


2009-04-09
&
Decision
ABB
Im
12 =139
I1
I2
I2
I1
Re

2009-04-09
Case1: external fault 74
ABB
I1
I2

2009-04-09
Im
Case 2: internal fault < 74
I1
I2
Re
12 =40
ABB
Tripping time
Definition
Time
t1
Time to recognition of fault (IDiff / Ikmin = 10 )
3 ms
t2
Sample window (1 Bus cycle)
0-(8) ms
t3
Preprocessing in the BU
4 ms
t4
Transfer and processing in the CU
8 ms
t5
Release of trip signals in the BU
1,5 ms
t6
Closing time tripping relay
5 ms
t7
Tolerance
0,4 ms
Total tripping time
21,9 ms

2009-04-09
Timet
Graphic
ABB
Tripping time
t = 21,9 - 29,9 ms
4 ms 4 ms
t 4 = 8 ms
C
E
IDiff
Central Unit
Ikmin

2009-04-09
Bay Unit
t 6=5ms
t 2 = 8 ms
t 1 = 3 ms
Fault incidence
= 10
t 3 = 4 ms
t 5 = 1,5 ms
t 7 = 0,4 ms
Protection trip
ABB
50
Tripping
40 ms
time
30
28 ms max.
20
20 ms min.

2009-04-09
10
0
1,2 5 10
20
30
40
IDiff
Ikmin
ABB
used test data (extreme current transformer saturation!)

2009-04-09
I / In
50 IN
ms
time
ABB
used test data (extreme current transformer saturation!)

2009-04-09
I / In
50 IN
ms
time
ABB
With
peak current extension!
Without
peak current extension
stabilized current differential algorithm

25 IN
25 IN
IDiff

2009-04-09
IDiff
35 IN
35 IN
IRest
IRest
ABB
With
Without

2009-04-09
50
time
100 ms
150
50
100 ms
150
time
ABB
With
Without
Phase comparison

2009-04-09
Phase
Difference
Phase comparison
Phase
Difference
140 ms
time
140 ms
time
ABB
Summary

2009-04-09
main features
Decentralized installation
Two separate, independent algorithms are used for each

protected busbar zone and each phase
In installations with current-limiting grounded networks the

zero-sequence current is monitored
The method of peak current extension provides the possibility

to drastically reduce the performance requirements for current
transformers
ABB

2009-04-09
REB500
The End !
ABB

1 REB500 BBP Algorithm

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

1 REB500 BBP Algorithm

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 1

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 2

Decentral busbar protection; application

Signal extension of peak-current and protection algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 3

Selective per bus-zone

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 4

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 5

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 6

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 7

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 8

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 9

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 10

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 11

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 12

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 13

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 14

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 15

Two independent protection algorithms

Comparison of current directions (phase comparison)

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 16

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 17

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 18

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 19

Stabilized current differential algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 20

Restraint Current IRest

Two independent protection algorithms

Comparison of current directions (phase comparison)

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 21

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 22

Case1: external fault 74

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 23

Case 2: internal fault < 74

Time to recognition of fault (IDiff / Ikmin = 10 )

Sample window (1 Bus cycle)

Transfer and processing in the CU

Release of trip signals in the BU

Closing time tripping relay

Total tripping time

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 24

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 25

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 26

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 27

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 28

stabilized current differential algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 29

stabilized current differential algorithm

stabilized current differential algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 30

stabilized current differential algorithm

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 31

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 32

Two separate, independent algorithms are used for each

In installations with current-limiting grounded networks the

The method of peak current extension provides the possibility

ABB Switzerland Ltd - 33

Вам также может понравиться