You are on page 1of 375

CIVIL COVER SHEET

JS 44 (Rev. 11/15)

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS

Stan J. Caterbone

National Security Agency, or NSA, et.al.,

Lancaster, PA

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff

County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)


NOTE:

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)

Washington, D.C.

(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)


IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

Attorneys (If Known)

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603 717-669-2163

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only)


1

U.S. Government
Plaintiff

Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)

U.S. Government
Defendant

Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff


(For Diversity Cases Only)
PTF
Citizen of This State
1

DEF
1

and One Box for Defendant)


PTF
DEF
Incorporated or Principal Place
4
4
of Business In This State

Citizen of Another State

Incorporated and Principal Place


of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country

Foreign Nation

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only)


CONTRACT

TORTS

110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veterans Benefits
160 Stockholders Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise

REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property

PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Federal Employers
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities Other
448 Education

FORFEITURE/PENALTY

PERSONAL INJURY
365 Personal Injury Product Liability
367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal
Property Damage
385 Property Damage
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate
Sentence
530 General
535 Death Penalty
Other:
540 Mandamus & Other
550 Civil Rights
555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement

625 Drug Related Seizure


of Property 21 USC 881
690 Other

BANKRUPTCY
422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
840 Trademark

LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Management
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Employee Retirement
Income Security Act

SOCIAL SECURITY
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))

FEDERAL TAX SUITS


870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff
or Defendant)
871 IRSThird Party
26 USC 7609

IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
465 Other Immigration
Actions

OTHER STATUTES
375 False Claims Act
376 Qui Tam (31 USC
3729(a))
400 State Reapportionment
410 Antitrust
430 Banks and Banking
450 Commerce
460 Deportation
470 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations
480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
850 Securities/Commodities/
Exchange
890 Other Statutory Actions
891 Agricultural Acts
893 Environmental Matters
895 Freedom of Information
Act
896 Arbitration
899 Administrative Procedure
Act/Review or Appeal of
Agency Decision
950 Constitutionality of
State Statutes

V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only)


1 Original
Proceeding

2 Removed from
State Court

Remanded from
Appellate Court

4 Reinstated or
Reopened

5 Transferred from
Another District
(specify)

6 Multidistrict
Litigation

Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):

Federal Habeus Corpus 28 2242

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Brief description of cause:

Prisoner of "Enemy of the State" since Whistleblowing on Defense Contractor ISC in 1987.

DEMAND $
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION
VII. REQUESTED IN
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY
JUDGE Edward Smith
DATE

CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:


Yes
No
JURY DEMAND:
DOCKET NUMBER 16-4014 Eastern District

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

08/22/2016
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT #

AMOUNT

Print

APPLYING IFP

Save As...

JUDGE

MAG. JUDGE

Reset

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 11/15)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44


Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a)

(b)

(c)

Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".

II.

Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)

III.

Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.

IV.

Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.

V.

Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.


Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.
Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407.
When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.

VI.

Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VII.

Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

AO 240 (Rev. 06/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


for the

Middle District
of Pennsylvania
__________
District
of __________
)
)
)
)
)

Stan J. Caterbone
Plaintiff
v.

National Security Agency, et.al.,


Defendant

Civil Action No.

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS


(Short Form)
I am a plaintiff or petitioner in this case and declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and
that I am entitled to the relief requested.
In support of this application, I answer the following questions under penalty of perjury:
1. If incarcerated. I am being held at:
.
If employed there, or have an account in the institution, I have attached to this document a statement certified by the
appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months for any
institutional account in my name. I am also submitting a similar statement from any other institution where I was
incarcerated during the last six months.
2. If not incarcerated. If I am employed, my employers name and address are:

My gross pay or wages are: $


(specify pay period)

, and my take-home pay or wages are: $

per

3. Other Income. In the past 12 months, I have received income from the following sources (check all that apply):
(a) Business, profession, or other self-employment
(b) Rent payments, interest, or dividends
(c) Pension, annuity, or life insurance payments
(d) Disability, or workers compensation payments
(e) Gifts, or inheritances
(f) Any other sources

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

No
No
No
No
No
No

If you answered Yes to any question above, describe below or on separate pages each source of money and
state the amount that you received and what you expect to receive in the future.
Social Security Disability Benefits for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. I was awarded
benefits in August of 2009 after applying in April of 2009. I received a lump sum of $21,456.00 in August of 2009 for 1
year retroactive to April of 2008. I was declared disabled in December of 2005, the time that I declared that I became
full-time telepathic with synthetic telepathy and subject to electromagnetic weapons, along with organized stalking,
harassment, computer hacking etc., In the application process there were no medical reports from any medical
physicians and there were no psychiatric evaluations by SSA. There was evaluation of the application and
documentation by the SSA Vocational Assessment Office in Baltimore, MD. I receive net $1, 357.00 per month.

AO 240 (Rev. 06/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form)

4. Amount of money that I have in cash or in a checking or savings account: $

24,000.00 .

5. Any automobile, real estate, stock, bond, security, trust, jewelry, art work, or other financial instrument or
thing of value that I own, including any item of value held in someone elses name (describe the property and its approximate
value):
2007 Honda CRV worth approximately $4,500.00 with an outstanding loan of $11,000.00 the loan is under-water due to
2 premeditated accidents. One in December of 2015 and one in May of 2016.

6. Any housing, transportation, utilities, or loan payments, or other regular monthly expenses (describe and provide
the amount of the monthly expense):

See Attached Expense Statement.

7. Names (or, if under 18, initials only) of all persons who are dependent on me for support, my relationship
with each person, and how much I contribute to their support:

8. Any debts or financial obligations (describe the amounts owed and to whom they are payable):
See the attached Balance Sheet.

Declaration: I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and understand that a false
statement may result in a dismissal of my claims.

Date:

08/22/2016
Applicants signature

Stan J. Caterbone
Printed name

Print

Save As...

Add Attachment

Reset

Page 1
PAE AO 239 (10/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


for the
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Eastern District of Pennsylvania

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLANIA

Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff/Petitioner
v. or NSA, et.al.,
National Security Agency,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
The United States of America, et.el.,
Defendant/Respondent

Civil Action No.

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS


(Long Form)

Affidavit in Support of the Application

Instructions

I am a plaintiff or petitioner in this case and declare


that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings
and that I am entitled to the relief requested. I declare
under penalty of perjury that the information below is
true and understand that a false statement may result
in a dismissal of my claims.

Complete all questions in this application and then sign it.


Do not leave any blanks: if the answer to a question is 0,
none, or not applicable (N/A), write that response. If
you need more space to answer a question or to explain your
answer, attach a separate sheet of paper identified with your
name, your case's docket number, and the question number.

Signed:

Date:

1.

August 22, 2016

For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of the following
sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received weekly, biweekly, quarterly,
semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use gross amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions
for taxes or otherwise.
Income source

Average monthly income


amount during the past 12
months
You
Spouse

Income amount expected


next month
You

Spouse

Employment

Self-employment

Income from real property (such as rental income)

Interest and dividends

Gifts

Alimony

Child support

Page 2
PAE AO 239 (10/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)

Retirement (such as social security, pensions, annuities,


insurance)

Disability (such as social security, insurance payments)

Unemployment payments

Public-assistance (such as welfare)

Other (specify):

Total monthly income:


2.

1,357.00

1,357.00

1,357.00

1,357.00

List your employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross monthly pay is before taxes or
other deductions.)

Employer

Address

Dates of employment

Gross
monthly pay
$
$

3.

List your spouse's employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross monthly pay is
before taxes or other deductions.)

Employer

Address

Dates of employment

Gross
monthly pay
$
$
$

4.

How much cash do you and your spouse have? $


Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other financial institution.

Financial institution
Members1st Bank
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bank
of Bird in Hand

TD Ameritrade
Direct Express

Type of account
Checking
Brokerage Account
SSA Disability Debit Card

Amount you have


$

$
$

$8,900.00

28,000.00
XXXXXXX
1 2,200.00

1,457.00

Amount your
spouse has
$
$
$

If you are a prisoner, you must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts,
expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you have multiple accounts,
perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each account.

Page 3
PAE AO 239 (10/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)

5.

List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing and ordinary
household furnishings.
Assets owned by you or your spouse

Home (Value)

Other real estate (Value)

Motor vehicle #1 (Value)

Make and year:

2007 Honda CRV

Model:

CRV EX

20,000.00

3,000.00

Motor vehicle #2 (Value)


Make and year:
Model:
Other assets (Value)

Other assets (Value)

6.

State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the amount owed.

Person owing you or your spouse


money

7.

Amount owed to you

Amount owed to your spouse

State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.

Name (or, if under 18, initials only)

Relationship

Age

Page 4
PAE AO 239 (10/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)

8.

Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the amounts paid by your
spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the
monthly rate.
You

Rent or home-mortgage payment (including lot rented for mobile home)


Are real estate taxes included? Yes No
Is property insurance included? Yes No

$ 300.00
No Mortgage

Utilities (electricity, heating fuel, water, sewer, and telephone)

$ 510.00

Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep)

300.00

Food

200.00

Clothing

50.00

Laundry and dry-cleaning

Medical and dental expenses

100.00

Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments)

100.00

Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc.

300.00

Your spouse
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)


Homeowner's or renter's:

Life:

Health:

145.00

Motor vehicle:

70.00

Other:

Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments) (specify):

30.00

$
$

200.00

$
$
$
$

Installment payments
Motor vehicle:

Credit card (name):

Department store (name):

Other:

Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others

220.00

$
$
$
$
$

Page 5
PAE AO 239 (10/09) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)

Regular expenses for operation of business, profession, or farm (attach detailed


Litigation and Filing of Complaints
statement)

Other (specify):

$
Total monthly expenses:

9.

$
$

2,655.00

Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or liabilities during the
next 12 months?

Yes
10.

200.00

No

If yes, describe on an attached sheet.

Have you paid or will you be paying an attorney any money for services in connection with this case,
including the completion of this form? Yes No
If yes, how much? $
If yes, state the attorney's name, address, and telephone number:

11.

Have you paid or will you be paying anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal or a typist) any money
Yes No
for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form?
If yes, how much? $ 1,000.00 - transcription of videos and audio transcripts
If yes, state the person's name, address, and telephone number:
Lancaster County Court Reporters Office, 50 North Duke Street, Lancaster, PA 17602
Dawn Sutton, 1248 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603

12.

Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of these proceedings.

***** My adversaries are obstructing justice and have been for 30 years by making me litigate for every

conceivable right in the U.S. Bill of Rights, thus extorting my cash, in addition to flat out stealing it
by thefts and vandalism, then to make matters worse the law enforcement committs an arrogant display
of abuse of process, along with one of the most obsurd cases of judicial misconduct from local to federal!

13.

Identify the city and state of your legal residence.


Lancaster, PA 17603
Your daytime phone number:
Your age:

58

My pro se billings are up to about $500,000.00 and


should be paid immediately!

(717) 669-2163

Your years of schooling:

Last four digits of your social-security number:

16
0959

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________________________________________
:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
:
CIVIL DIVISION
Petitioner
:
CASE NO.
____________
v.
United States President Barrack Obama
National Security Agency, or NSA
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA
Department of Defense
Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA
Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA
Federal Bureau of Investigation, or FBI
United States Department of Justice
United States Attorney General
Pennsylvania State Police
Pennsylvania Attorney General
Lancaster County Commissioners
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention
Lancaster County Sheriff Department
Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray
Lancaster City Bureau of Police
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Bureau of Police
Fairmount Behavioral Health System
Dr. Silvia Gratz, Medical Director, Fairmount Behavioral Health System
Lancaster General Hospital
Nurse Jane Doe, Charge Nurse for the Psychiatric Emergency Room, Lancaster General
Hospital
Lancaster Regional Medical Center
MedExpress, Urgent Care, Rohrerstown Road, Lancaster, PA
Southeast Medical Center, Brightside Baptist Church, Lancaster PA
Patient First Urgent Care, Butler Avenue, Lancaster, PA
Bank of Bird-In-Hand
Altana/Rooftop Bar, Ben Frank, Owner
PNC Bankruptcy
Wells Fargo Bankruptcy
Marion Courtroom Bar and Grill, Courtside Bar, Mike Geezy, Owner
Bistro Barberet and Bakery, Annie Bailies Bar and Restaurant, Yorgos, Tellus360

Defendants

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 1 of 365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS


A Petition for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

AND

NOW,

on

this

22nd

day

of

August

2016,

the

PETITIONER,

Stanley

J.

Caterbone/Advanced Media Group, do hereby file the following pursuant to the Federal Habeus
CORPUS statutes prescribed in 28 2242 as prescribed by law.

The Plaintiff alleges violations

according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal Habeus CORPUS statutes which states:
where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.

The

PETITIONER, Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group do hereby request the

permission of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA to grant permission to hear this case due to the Hostile Environment of the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania which is being used as a means of causing
severe mental anguish, pain, and suffering which is in essence obstruction of justice in the most
extreme sense. On August 5, 2016 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Case No. 16-cv-4014 the PETITIONER filed a Motion To Withdraw Without Prejudice that was
GRANTED by U.S. District Court Judge Edward G. Smith for the above mentioned reasons as an
INSTANT MOTION TO DISMISS. See Attached Motion and Court Docket

The Plaintiff alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987, and that
the activities surrounding the PETITIONER'S life has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults.
Unfortunately while the PETITIONER has made many in person complaints to just about every law
enforcement agency, the most recent to the Manheim Township Substation in Lancaster Township
regarding an assault at the Manor Shopping Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015
9:00pm), the pleas for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to the
PETITIONER'S person, property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and
lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. The
PETITIONER has already made claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A.
Case No. 15-3400 against these same said actors and perpetrators. The PETITIONER will provide
evidence to support this writ and offer a final remedy and redress in accordance with federal law.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 2 of 365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Due to the actions and criminal activity of the above named DEFENDANTS, it is reasonable
to prove that every aspect of the Complainants life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo
influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc. thus resulting in irreparable harm and injury.
This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and in Part II, Finding of Facts, and all
previous filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or
suicide. There is no life action or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The
precedent and landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the Complainant has never
done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding International Signal
& Control back in 1987; as well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is
also widely reported that many Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
are lead to death and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating;
abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and federal law
enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is landmark.
The Complainant seeks a temporary injunction until a permanent resolution to these issues
can be constructed.
Irreparable Harm: The irreparable harm and injure that has resulted from the above
circumstances includes but is not limited to the following:
1. Loss of personal property and real estate.
2. Loss of opportunity to secure personal property, business assets, and court related assets,
information, and evidence; including when sleeping (rape drug rohypnol).
3. Loss of protection from law enforcement at every level; local, state, and federal.
4. Loss of relationships including family; friends; and professional.
5. Loss of time and loss of life as a normal person would know it.
6. Loss of freedom of movement in Downtown Lancaster Entertainment Venues and Constant
and Never Ending Threats of Physical Harm, Harassment, Over-Charging on Cost of Goods,
intimidation, discrimination, and barring from entering public places and entertainment
venues, violations of intellectual property rights, and obstruction of justice.
7. Loss of freedom of movement; complainant has been denied every opportunity to secure
his personal and business assets at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania making
it impossible to travel or leave for any amount of time without fear of harm.
8. Loss of freedom of movement may constitute false imprisonment and may invoke the
federal Habeus CORPUS laws of freedom.
9. Loss of female companionship, and under constant mocking for it.
10.Loss of business opportunities.
11.Loss of accounts receivables.
12.Loss of professional and personal reputation; especially with specific regards to honesty
and integrity.
13. Civil and Criminal Conspiracy to manufacture mental illness symptoms and illnesses.
The PETITIONER acknowledges that this petition may lead to a landmark decision,
however, the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, and the military industrial
complex had MADE CERTAIN THESE ACTIVITES AND POLICIES REMAINED HIDDEN FROM THE

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 3 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

CITZENRY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND GLOBALLY AS WELL.

In fact, all things

considered, they may welcome the purging of these technologies, the technologies and tactics of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control may be used by other criminal elements, including foreign nations
and possibly terrorist organizations.
Date: August 22, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401

Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 4 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


PLAINTIFF
:
:
v.
:
:
The United States of America, et al.
:
DEFENDANTS
:
:
:

CASE NO. 16-04014

MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Typed Version of Previous Filing)

I, Stanley J. Caterbone on this 5 th day of August 2016, Appearing Pro Se, Do hereby file this
MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the Hostile Environment of the U.S. District
Courts which is being used as a means of causing severe mental anguish, pain, and suffering
which is in essence obstruction of justice in the most extreme sense. See the Third Circuit Docket
07-4474 attached.

Dated:

August 5, 2016

_____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 5 of 365

Monday August 22, 2016

Filed at U.S. District


ClerkHabeus
of Court
Counter
Federal
Corpus
Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page
Page611of
of
of365
17
7
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page72ofof365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page83ofof365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page94ofof365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page
105of
of365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page
116of
of365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page
127of
of365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Case J.
Stan
No.
Caterbone
16-04014Writ
Motion
of Habeus
To Withdraw
Corpus

Page
Page
138of
of365
8

Monday August
August22,
5, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

JURISDICTION
Birth of the Modern Writ. In 1867, Congress substantially increased the jurisdiction of
federal courts to issue the writ by authorizing its issuance in all cases, state or federal, where
any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of
any treaty or law of the United States.16 Originally, Habeus CORPUS permitted collateral
attack upon a prisoner's conviction only if the sentencing court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
Shortly after 1867, however, the Supreme Court began to recognize a growing number of
circumstances where courts were said to have acted beyond their jurisdiction because some
constitutional violation had extinguished or "voided" their jurisdiction.17 This development was of
limited benefit to most prisoners, since most were confined under state convictions and relatively
few of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution were thought to apply against the states. Even
when a constitutional claim was available, state prisoners could not be granted federal Habeus
relief until all possibility of state judicial relief trial, appellate, and post conviction had been
exhausted.181
FOOTNOTES: 1 16 That the several courts of the United States, and the several justices and
judges of such courts, within their respective jurisdictions, in addition to the authority already
conferred by law, shall have power to grant writs of HABEUS CORPUS in all cases where any
person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty or
law of the United States; and it shall be lawful for such person so restrained of his or her liberty to
apply to either of said justices or judges for a writ of HABEUS CORPUS, which application shall be
in writing and verified by affidavit, and shall set forth the facts concerning the detention of the
party applying, in whose custody he or she is detained, and by virtue of what claim or authority, if
known; and the said justice or judge to whom such application shall be made shall forthwith
award a writ of HABEUS CORPUS, unless it shall appear from the petition itself that the party is
not deprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the constitution or laws of the United States,
14 Stat. 385-86 (1867). At the same time, Congress modified and codified much of the procedure
associated with the writ, including an appellate provision that was soon thereafter repealed, 15
Stat. 44 (1868); see Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869).
17 See e.g.: Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S.(18 Wall.) 163 (1874). Lange had been convicted of an
offense punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a fine
and a term of imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that once
Lange had paid the fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his confinement
was subject to the writ. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold, although the statute in

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page14
5 of
of356
365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

question was found to be within the power of Congress, the Court held that had the prisoner been
convicted under an unconstitutional law he would have been entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to
discharge on the writ because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried,
convicted and sentenced him to fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed
by the district attorney rather than upon a grand jury indictment as required by the
Fifth Amendment in the case of all capital and otherwise infamous crimes. In re Snow,
120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow was convicted of three counts of cohabitation based on the
same conduct during three different periods of time. The Court found that the
misconduct was one continuous offense rather than three offenses. Since three
sentences would constitute multiple punishment contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the
trial court had acted beyond its jurisdiction and the writ should issue.
Federal Habeus CORPUS statutes prescribed in 28 2242 as prescribed by law states the
following according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal HABEUS CORPUS statutes states:
where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.

Birth of the Modern Writ. In 1867, Congress substantially increased the jurisdiction of federal
courts to issue the writ by authorizing its issuance in all cases, state or federal, where any
person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any
treaty or law of the United States.16 Originally, Habeus CORPUS permitted collateral attack
upon a prisoner's conviction only if the sentencing court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Shortly
after 1867, however, the Supreme Court began to recognize a growing number of circumstances
where courts were said to have acted beyond their jurisdiction because some constitutional
violation had extinguished or "voided" their jurisdiction.17 This development was of limited benefit
to most prisoners, since most were confined under state convictions and relatively few of the
rights guaranteed by the Constitution were thought to apply against the states. Even when a
constitutional claim was available, state prisoners could not be granted federal HABEUS relief until
all possibility of state judicial relief trial, appellate, and post conviction had been
exhausted.181
FOOTNOTES: 1 16 That the several courts of the United States, and the several justices and
judges of such courts, within their respective jurisdictions, in addition to the authority already
conferred by law, shall have power to grant writs of Habeus CORPUS in all cases where any person

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page15
6 of
of356
365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty or law of the
United States; and it shall be lawful for such person so restrained of his or her liberty to apply to
either of said justices or judges for a writ of HABEUS CORPUS, which application shall be in writing
and verified by affidavit, and shall set forth the facts concerning the detention of the party
applying, in whose custody he or she is detained, and by virtue of what claim or authority, if
known; and the said justice or judge to whom such application shall be made shall forthwith
award a writ of HABEUS CORPUS, unless it shall appear from the petition itself that the party is
not deprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the constitution or laws of the United States,
14 Stat. 385-86 (1867). At the same time, Congress modified and codified much of the procedure
associated with the writ, including an appellate provision that was soon thereafter repealed, 15
Stat. 44 (1868); see Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869).
17 See e.g.: Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S.(18 Wall.) 163 (1874). Lange had been convicted of an
offense punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a fine
and a term of imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that once
Lange had paid the fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his confinement
was subject to the writ. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold, although the statute in
question was found to be within the power of Congress, the Court held that had the prisoner been
convicted under an unconstitutional law he would have been entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to discharge on the
writ because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried, convicted and sentenced
him to fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed by the district attorney rather than
upon a grand jury indictment as required by the Fifth Amendment in the case of all capital and
otherwise infamous crimes. In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow was convicted of three counts
of cohabitation based on the same conduct during three different periods of time. The Court found
that the misconduct was one continuous offense rather than three offenses. Since three sentences
would constitute multiple punishment contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the trial court had acted
beyond its jurisdiction and the writ should issue.
Has the Petitioner Exhausted his Appeals in the State Courts?
Discrimination And Contempt In The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Courts.
The PETTITIONER alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987.

Just the

most recent activities of the PETITIONER are a clear indication of such. The activities surrounding
the PETITIONER'S life since June of 2015 immediately following the filing of an amicus curiae in

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page16
7 of
of356
365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Case of this same said court, No. 14-02559, in which the
PETITIONER was named MOVANT, has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately
while the PETITIONER has made many in person complaints to just about every law enforcement
agency, the most recent to the Manheim Township Substation in Lancaster Township regarding an
assault at the Manor Shopping Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015 9:00pm), the pleas
for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to the PETITIONER'S person,
property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-ofmind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made
claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these
same said actors and perpetrators.
The PETTITIONER has made many failed attempts to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in
1987 to address these very same issues, specifically the Pennsylvania Securities Commission
(Agent Howard Eisler), the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office (Detective Bodan), the Civile
Rights Enforcement Division of the Pennsylvania Attorney General (Investigator ....).

The

PETITIONER will argue that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is unable to address these issues
without prejudice, without discrimination, and without corruption. This can be best described in
the following Letter to the Editor of the NEWSLANC organization of recent weeks:

I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to
1987, made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In
1987 I blew the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was
indicted for selling arms and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA
and the NSA. It was the 3rd largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I
was the victim of a widespread wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that
included 29 false arrests, multiple false imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that
to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on
this culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they
so emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that
suggests they are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The
sad fact that it reaches into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most
outrageous and deplorable truth to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the
APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus
CORPUS for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page17
8 of
of356
365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell found her actually
innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the English speaking
language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention when then
Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus CORPUS
cases. To make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable
Stewart Dalzell from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9
months while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable
Judge Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to
life in prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer
Bill Curtis did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT
and Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same
type of wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle
Lambert fell victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed
attorney threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be
successful in helping her win the Habeus CORPUS she filed in May of 2014.

I allege the U.S.

District Judge was trying in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to
restore me to whole from a life of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised
some 90 million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of
5 domestic companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client
list that reached across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies.
And in 1987, myself and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous
recording studio, Power Station Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first
"digital movie". The intellectual property rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal
claims in federal courts were too much for the "Good Old Boys" to handle....
In a December 30 editorial to the Washington Post titled Pornographic email scandal roils
Pennsylvania politics regarding the jurisprudence in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the
following was quoted by the editor of

Newslanc.com;

"Anyone who neutrally looked at Pennsylvania and tried to gauge the quality of
jurisprudence in the state would have to laugh and say, What in the world is going on

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page18
9 of
of356
365

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

there? . . . Our justice system is about as out of control as it can get.

"EDITOR:

These matters cannot properly be settled within Pennsylvania. Everybody from the
prosecutors, to the attorney general, to the justices have skin in the game. It is time for
these matters to be given over to U. S. Attorney General so assure as close to a
disinterested investigation as circumstances permit."

PLACED ON TERRORIST LIST BY HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY TOM RIDGE IN


2004?
On March 8, 2016 I was illegally detained, handcuffed and interrogated by no less than
eight (8) National Security Agency Police in the barracks of Ft. Meade Maryland with no probable
cause for approximately 2 hours. My auto was searched and sniffed by the NSA CANINE UNIT. I
was interrogated about events from 1987 to the present involving my Whistleblowing activities,
my litigation, my mental health record and my intent on why I was traveling to Washington, D.C.
I was commanded not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And was commanded not to enter any
federally owned property again. I left the barracks and proceeded home to Lancaster, PA.
In July of 2005 at a military museum (Open to the Public) on a military base I was
detained and interrogated by two (2) Defense Intelligence Agents, or DIA of the Department of
Defense in Austin, Texas for about 1 hours for no probable cause.

I was asked the same

questions as above and was not allowed to leave until the agents verified that I was staying with
my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, who at the time resided in Austin, Texas. I was commanded not
to ever enter a military base again.
In January of 2006 I was detained and interrogated by Homeland Security in Houston
Airport upon the return from Puerto Vallarte, Mexico after being pulled from the line for allegedly
having plastic explosives in my back pack.

Of course it was fabricated and I was allowed

to

leave.
The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free
Dictionary by FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at
another's expense without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services,
or other benefits that have been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment
doctrine is sometimes referred to as a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based
on an express contract. Instead, litigants normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment
when they have no written or verbal contract to support their claim for relief. In such instances
litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that is implied in law, a fictitious relationship
created by courts to do justice in a particular case.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 19 of 356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Emergency Injunction for Relief:


There are six essential prerequisites that a party must establish prior to obtaining a Preliminary
Emergency Injunction For Relief:
1) that the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be
adequately compensated by damages;
2) that greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it, and,
concomitantly, that issuance of an injunction will not substantially harm other interested parties in
the proceedings;
3) that a preliminary injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed
immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct;
4) that the activity it seeks to restrain is actionable, that its right to relief is clear, and that the
wrong is manifest, or, in other words, that it is likely to prevail on the merits;
5) that the injunction it seeks is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and,
6) that a preliminary injunction will not adversely affect the public interest
Relief Sought By Plaintiff: The Complainant seeks immediate relief from the above in the form
of sanctions and fines for those guilty of extortion and embezzlement and those withholding
accounts receivables.

Complainant seeks immediate relief from the law enforcement agencies

that continue abuse of process.

Complainant seeks immediate relief from public officials for

obstructing justice and due process. Complainant seeks relief, in as much as the courts are able,
with regards to the harassment and torture from those known of such crimes. The Complainant
seeks relief from stalking and harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement to make sure
households can identify all occupants and prove they are entitled to the lease and or deed.

The

Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his PRO SE BILLINGS INVOICE.
The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant SUMMARY JUDGMENT in all
cases filed before the LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and the U.S.
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA in REMEDY AND
RELIEF for the ARROGANCE OF BOTH THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY AND
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM FOR THE SYSTEMIC ABUSE OF PROCESS AND THE EXTREME
NATURE OF THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHICH IN ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
PUTTING THE COMPLAINANT'S LIFE IN HARMS WAY ON A DAILY BASIS.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 20
11 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Targeted

Individuals

An

Overview

(Taken

from

the

website:

http://targetedindividual.blogspot.com/)
Essentially, a targeted individual has officially been declared an "enemy of the State". Your
unrelenting harassment has now entered an entirely new phase. From what was once State and
most likely federal law enforcement surveillance (for whatever reason) has now graduated to a
little-known CIA / U.S. military psychological harassment & physical torture campaign that is so
extensive and seemingly so absurd to the average American citizen, you will almost certainly be
labeled as having a mental illness and/or paranoia just for simply describing what has now
become your daily reality. The only other people that truly understand the extent of the
harassment & torture are fellow targeted individuals who have also been experiencing similar
violations

of

their

civil,

constitutional

and

basic

human

rights.

"I'm being followed everywhere I go", "it seems like they are everywhere", "it's like they
can read my mind and know where I'll be"...these are the types of statements, that while actually
quite accurate (keep reading), can easily make a targeted individual appear to have lost their
mind. In order for it to make more sense, let's once again review who is now orchestrating this
abuse against a targeted individual. Our military (essentially our international police force) and
our intelligence community are in control. This harassment campaign has reached the highest
levels of our government and as such, the resources at their disposable are truly unimaginable. Is
it just the military perpetrating this harassment campaign? Of course NOT! They have simply been
handed control. What this means for a targeted individual is that EVERY law enforcement tool
available from your local community watch, community organizations (ie Freemasons) and
"concerned citizen" types all the way up through Homeland Security including the U.S. military
have placed YOU in their cross hairs. If you are a targeted individual your conversations are being
monitored (whether inside your home, your car, your office, and obviously your telephone), your
movements and actions are constantly being monitored (whether inside your home or out in
public), your electronic correspondence is being monitored (email, websites you visit, letters you
write on your computer, etc) - you are being WATCHED! 24/7/365. Again, this isn't your local
Sheriff sitting in an "unmarked" patrol car eating his donut on a stakeout. A targeted individual
has every known (AND classified) technology being deployed, and most likely TESTED, against
them. Understand it and deal with it in a logical and sensible manner. I don't mean to alarm you,
but this is the unfortunate reality that any targeted individual now finds them self in. Maybe it's a
little clearer now HOW "they" can be everywhere you go and seem to be able to "read your mind".
Targeted individuals are not crazy - but be very careful...the perception of mental illness is one of
the many traps a program like this was designed to create. If not the actual illness itself.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 21
12 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

So, besides an absolute abomination of a targeted individuals right to privacy, what other tactics
are being deployed against a targeted individual. The hardest to prove and the most criminal
tactic used (especially when a target has 3 young & developing children in the home such as
myself) is a continuous poisoning and torture of the target by invisible directed electromagnetic
radiation. If this is a new topic to you, it may be unclear exactly what electromagnetic radiation
(EMR) is. After all, it's not exactly the kind of topic an average American is thinking about. Well, to
name a few examples, electromagnetic radiation ranges from radio frequency waves (RF) to the
more destructive & potentially deadly ionizing forms of x-rays and gamma rays. In the lower to
mid spectrum there are also radar waves, microwaves, ultraviolet and infrared light waves.
What I noticed when this harassment campaign began for myself toward the end of 2005 was the
continuous jet plane(s) that suddenly began flying "holding patterns" for extended periods of time
above & around my home. My theory is that these planes are equipped with sophisticated radar
imaging technology. Possibly very high powered infrared imaging cameras as well. Rather than
using these electromagnetic radiation devices to "search" for something, in the case of a targeted
individual these devices are used to slowly poison and "overload" the targeted individual with
continuous high doses of directed electromagnetic radiation. Once a targeted individuals body has
been properly overexposed over a period of time (months), other portable devices may then be
used to keep a target in a constant state of agitation and dis-ease. And for the more fragile
among us, maybe even death! This tactic can be the premier form of making a target seem crazy
by forcing them to report what appear to be insane accusations against neighbors, the people
"following them everywhere", planes over their home and the government. Another obvious
reason for deploying this invisible & silent torture tactic is to provoke a targeted individual to lash
out in sheer frustration and anger against the closest person (who most likely has absolutely
nothing to do with the ongoing abuse). Essentially, this is the ultimate version of entrapment. And
may even be the ultimate, basically unprovable form of a state-sanctioned murder!

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 22
13 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of
covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political
organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights
Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party),
feminist organizations, anti-colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like
the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these
movements and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO
was William C. Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally authorized some of
these programs.[8] Although Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King's
phones "on a trial basis, for a month or so",[9] Hoover extended the clearance so his men were
"unshackled" to look for evidence in any areas of King's life they deemed worthy.[10]
History
Centralized operations under COINTELPRO officially began in August 1956 with a program
designed to "increase factionalism, cause disruption and win defections" inside the Communist
Party U.S.A. (CPUSA). Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of
documents that would divide the American communist organization internally.[11] An October
1956 memo from Hoover reclassified the FBI's ongoing surveillance of black leaders, including it
within COINTELPRO, with the justification that the movement was infiltrated by communists.[12]
In 1956, Hoover sent an open letter denouncing Dr. T.R.M. Howard, a civil rights leader, surgeon,
and wealthy entrepreneur in Mississippi who had criticized FBI inaction in solving recent murders
of George W. Lee, Emmett Till, and other blacks in the South.[13] When the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference (SCLC) was founded in 1957, the FBI began to monitor and target the
group almost immediately, focusing particularly on Bayard Rustin, Stanley Levison, and,
eventually, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.[14]
After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major
target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote:

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 23
14 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In the light of King's powerful demagogic speech. ... We must mark him now, if we have not done
so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of
communism, the Negro, and national security.[16]
Soon after, the FBI was systematically bugging King's home and his hotel rooms, as they now
were aware that King was growing in stature daily as the leader among leaders of the Negro
movement.[17]
In the mid-1960s, King began publicly criticizing the Bureau for giving insufficient attention to the
use of terrorism by white supremacists. Hoover responded by publicly calling King the most
"notorious liar" in the United States.[18] In his 1991 memoir, Washington Post journalist Carl
Rowan asserted that the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to
commit suicide.[19] Historian Taylor Branch documents an anonymous November 21, 1964
"suicide package" sent by the FBI that contained audio recordings of King's sexual indiscretions
combined with a letter telling him "There is only one way out for you. You better take it before
your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation." And even by 1969, as has been
noted elsewhere, "[FBI] efforts to 'expose' Martin Luther King, Jr. had not slackened even though
King had been dead for a year. [The Bureau] furnished ammunition to conservatives to attack
King's memory, and...tried to block efforts to honor the slain leader." [20]
During the same period the program also targeted Malcolm X. While an FBI spokesman has denied
that the FBI was "directly" involved in Malcolm's murder, it is documented that the Bureau worked
to "widen the rift" between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad through infiltration and the "sparking
of acrimonious debates within the organization," rumor-mongering, and other tactics designed to
foster internal disputes; which ultimately led to Malcolm's assassination.[21][22] The FBI heavily
infiltrated Malcolm's Organization of Afro-American Unity in the final months of his life. The
Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Malcolm X by Manning Marable asserts that most of the men
who plotted Malcolm's assassination were never apprehended and that the full extent of the FBI's
involvement in his death cannot be known.[23][24]
Amidst the urban unrest of JulyAugust 1967, the FBI began "COINTELPROBLACK HATE", which
focused on King and the SCLC as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC),
the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Deacons for Defense and Justice, Congress of
Racial Equality (CORE), and the Nation of Islam.[25] BLACK HATE established the Ghetto
Informant Program and instructed 23 FBI offices to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise
neutralize the activities of black nationalist hate type organizations".[26]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 24
15 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

A March 1968 memo stated the program's goal was to "prevent the coalition of militant black
nationalist groups" ; to "Prevent the RISE OF A 'MESSIAH' who could unify...the militant black
nationalist movement" ; "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before they
exercise their potential for violence [against authorities]." ; to "Prevent militant black nationalist
groups and leaders from gaining RESPECTABILITY, by discrediting them to...both the responsible
community and to liberals who have vestiges of sympathy..."; and to "prevent the long-range
GROWTH of militant black organizations, especially among youth." Dr. King was said to have
potential to be the "messiah" figure, should he abandon nonviolence and integrationism;[27]
Stokely Carmichael was noted to have "the necessary charisma to be a real threat in this way;" as
he was seen as someone who espoused a much more militant vision of "black power."[28]
This program coincided with a broader federal effort to prepare military responses for urban riots,
and began increased collaboration between the FBI, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security
Agency, and the Department of Defense. The CIA launched its own domestic espionage project in
1967 called Operation CHAOS.[29] A particular target was the Poor People's Campaign, a national
effort organized by King and the SCLC to occupy Washington, D.C. The FBI monitored and
disrupted the campaign on a national level, while using targeted smear tactics locally to
undermine support for the march.[30]
Overall, COINTELPRO encompassed disruption and sabotage of the Socialist Workers Party (1961),
the Ku Klux Klan (1964), the Nation of Islam, the Black Panther Party (1967), and the entire New
Left social/political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious groups (1968). A
later investigation by the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that "COINTELPRO began
in 1956, in part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's
power to proceed overtly against dissident groups ..."[31] Official congressional committees and
several court cases[32] have concluded that COINTELPRO operations against communist and
socialist groups exceeded statutory limits on FBI activity and violated constitutional guarantees of
freedom of speech and association.[1]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 25
16 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Program exposed

The building broken into by the Citizen's Commission to Investigate the FBI, at One Veterans
Square, Media, Pennsylvania
The program was successfully kept secret until 1971, when the Citizens' Commission to
Investigate the FBI burgled an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania, took several dossiers, and
exposed the program by passing this material to news agencies.[33] Many news organizations
initially refused to publish the information. Within the year, Director J. Edgar Hoover declared that
the centralized COINTELPRO was over, and that all future counterintelligence operations would be
handled on a case-by-case basis.[34][35]
Additional documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI by
NBC correspondent Carl Stern, the Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. In 1976
the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of
the United States Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee" for its chairman,
Senator Frank Church of Idaho, launched a major investigation of the FBI and COINTELPRO.
Journalists and historians speculate that the government has not released many dossier and
documents related to the program. Many released documents have been partly, or entirely,
redacted.
The Final Report of the Select Committee castigated conduct of the intelligence community in its
domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:
The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated
specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they
were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national
security" the law did not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their
superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 26
17 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

most serious breaches of duty were those of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling
intelligence activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law.[1] Many of the
techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been
involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ... the Bureau conducted a
sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment
rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups
and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.
[31]
Range of targets
At its inception, the programs's main target was the Communist Party.[36]
According to the Church Committee:
While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security"
or prevent violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent
and most had no connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations
and individuals were targeted because the Bureau believed they represented a
"potential" for violenceand nonviolent citizens who were against the war in Vietnam
were targeted because they gave "aid and comfort" to violent demonstrators by
lending respectability to their cause.
The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to
define the subjects of the programs. The Black Nationalist program, according to its
supervisor, included "a great number of organizations that you might not today
characterize as black nationalist but which were in fact primarily black." Thus, the
nonviolent Southern Christian Leadership Conference was labeled as a Black
Nationalist-"Hate Group."
Furthermore, the actual targets were chosen from a far broader group than the titles of
the programs would imply. The CPUSA program targeted not only Communist Party
members but also sponsors of the National Committee to Abolish the House UnAmerican Activities Committee and civil rights leaders allegedly under Communist
influence or deemed to be not sufficiently "anti-Communist". The Socialist Workers
Party program included non-SWP sponsors of anti-war demonstrations which were
cosponsored by the SWP or the Young Socialist Alliance, its youth group. The Black
Nationalist program targeted a range of organizations from the Panthers to SNCC to
the peaceful Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and included every Black
Student Union and many other black student groups. New Left targets ranged from the

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 27
18 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

SDS to the InterUniversity Committee for Debate on Foreign Policy, from Antioch
College ("vanguard of the New Left") to the New Mexico Free University and other
"alternate" schools, and from underground newspapers to students' protesting
university censorship of a student publication by carrying signs with four-letter words
on them.
Examples of surveillance, spanning all presidents from FDR to Nixon, both legal and illegal,
contained in the Church Committee report:[37]
President Roosevelt asked the FBI to put in its files the names of citizens sending telegrams
to the White House opposing his "national defense" policy and supporting Col. Charles
Lindbergh.
President Truman received inside information on a former Roosevelt aide's efforts to
influence his appointments, labor union negotiating plans, and the publishing plans of
journalists.
President Eisenhower received reports on purely political and social contacts with foreign
officials by Bernard Baruch, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Supreme Court Justice William O.
Douglas.
The Kennedy administration had the FBI wiretap a congressional staff member, three
executive officials, a lobbyist, and a Washington law firm. US Attorney General Robert F.
Kennedy received the fruits of an FBI wire tap on Martin Luther King, Jr. and an electronic
listening device targeting a congressman, both of which yielded information of a political
nature.
President Johnson asked the FBI to conduct "name checks" of his critics and members of
the staff of his 1964 opponent, Senator Barry Goldwater. He also requested purely political
intelligence on his critics in the Senate, and received extensive intelligence reports on
political activity at the 1964 Democratic Convention from FBI electronic surveillance.
President Nixon authorized a program of wiretaps which produced for the White House
purely political or personal information unrelated to national security, including information
about a Supreme Court Justice.
Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include
communist and socialist organizations
organizations and individuals associated with the Civil Rights Movement, including Rev. Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 28
19 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress
of Racial Equality, and other civil rights organizations
black nationalist groups
the Young Lords
the American Indian Movement
the white supremacist groups
the Ku Klux Klan
the National States' Rights Party
a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic
Society and the Weathermen
almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators
with no group affiliation
the National Lawyers Guild
organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement
nationalist groups such as those seeking independence for Puerto Rico, United Ireland, and
Cuban exile movements including Orlando Bosch's Cuban Power and the Cuban Nationalist
Movement;
and additional notable Americans.[38]
The COINTELPRO documents show numerous cases of the FBI's intentions to prevent and disrupt
protests against the Vietnam War. Many techniques were used to accomplish this task. "These
included promoting splits among antiwar forces, encouraging red-baiting of socialists, and pushing
violent confrontations as an alternative to massive, peaceful demonstrations." One 1966
COINTELPRO operation tried to redirect the Socialist Workers Party from their pledge of support
for the antiwar movement.[39]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 29
20 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Methods

Body of Fred Hampton, national spokesman for the Black Panther Party, who was murdered[40]
[41] by members of the Chicago Police Department, as part of a COINTELPRO operation.[42][43]
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main methods
during COINTELPRO:
1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main
purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and
scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine
activists as agents.
2. Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine
progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and
other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent
anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation
about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents,
and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others
to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-jacketing to create suspicion about targeted
activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.[44]
3. Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured
testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful
imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations
and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in
an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters.[42][45]
4. Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to
conduct illegal break-ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism,

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 30
21 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

assaults, beatings and assassinations.[42] The object was to frighten or eliminate


dissidents and disrupt their movements.
The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between various
factions in the black militancy movement, for example between the Black Panthers, the US
Organization, and the Blackstone Rangers. This resulted in numerous deaths, among which were
San Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell.[42]
Dhoruba Bin Wahad a former Black Panther, reflects on how these tactics made him feel, saying
he had a combat mentality and felt like he was at war with the government. When asked about
why he thinks the Black Panthers were targeted he said, "In the United States, the equivalent of
the military was the local police. During the early sixties, at the height of the Civil Rights
Movement, and the human rights movement, the police in the United States became increasingly
militaristic. They began to train out of military bases in the United States. The Law Enforcement
Assistance Act (LEAA) supplied local police with military technology, everything from assault rifles
to army personnel carriers. In his opinion, the Counterintelligence Program went hand-in-hand
with the militarization of the police in the Black community, with the militarization of police in
America."[46]
The FBI also conspired with the police departments of many U.S. cities (San Diego, Los Angeles,
San Francisco, Oakland, Philadelphia, Chicago) to encourage repeated raids on Black Panther
homesoften with little or no evidence of violations of federal, state, or local lawswhich resulted
directly in the police killing many members of the Black Panther Party, most notably Chicago Black
Panther Party Chairman Fred Hampton on December 4, 1969.[42][43][47]
In order to eliminate black militant leaders whom they considered dangerous, the FBI is believed
to have worked with local police departments to target specific individuals,[48] accuse them of
crimes they did not commit, suppress exculpatory evidence and falsely incarcerate them. Elmer
"Geronimo" Pratt, a Black Panther Party leader, was incarcerated for 27 years before a California
Superior Court vacated his murder conviction, ultimately freeing him. Appearing before the court,
an FBI agent testified that he believed Pratt had been framed, because both the FBI and the Los
Angeles Police Department knew he had not been in the area at the time the murder occurred.
[49][50]
Some sources claim that the FBI conducted more than 200 "black bag jobs",[51][52] which were
warrantless surreptitious entries, against the targeted groups and their members.[53]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 31
22 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

J. Edgar Hoover
In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the Black
Panther Party (BPP) had concluded that in his city, at least, the Panthers were primarily engaged
in feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the agent's career goals
would be directly affected by his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the BPP was "a
violence-prone organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary means".[54]
Hoover supported using false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote:
"Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the BPP and it is immaterial whether facts exist
to substantiate the charge."[55]
In one particularly controversial 1965 incident, white civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was murdered
by Ku Klux Klansmen, who gave chase and fired shots into her car after noticing that her
passenger was a young black man; one of the Klansmen was Gary Thomas Rowe, an
acknowledged FBI informant.[56][57] The FBI spread rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the
Communist Party and had abandoned her children to have sexual relationships with African
Americans involved in the Civil Rights Movement.[58][59] FBI records show that J. Edgar Hoover
personally communicated these insinuations to President Johnson.[60][61] FBI informant Rowe
has also been implicated in some of the most violent crimes of the 1960s civil rights era, including
attacks on the Freedom Riders and the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama 16th Street Baptist Church
bombing.[56] According to Noam Chomsky, in another instance in San Diego, the FBI financed,
armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen, transforming it into a
group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in
the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.[62][63][64]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 32
23 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Hoover ordered preemptive action "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before
they exercise their potential for violence."[5]
Illegal surveillance
The final report of the Church Committee concluded:
Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too
much information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken
the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those
beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power.
The Government, operating primarily through secret and biased informants, but also
using other intrusive techniques such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious
mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about the
personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations of groups
deemed potentially dangerousand even of groups suspected of associating with
potentially dangerous organizationshave continued for decades, despite the fact that
those groups did not engage in unlawful activity.
Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted
because of their political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have
been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable.
Unsavory, harmful and vicious tactics have been employedincluding anonymous
attempts to break up marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their
professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that might result in deaths.
Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal objectives of presidents
and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to
pressure from high officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also
occasionally initiated improper activities and then concealed them from officials whom
they had a duty to inform.
Governmental officialsincluding those whose principal duty is to enforce the law
have violated or ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and
defended their right to break the law.
The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled
intelligence activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the
scope of permissible activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 33
24 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

agencies. Congress has failed to exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the
use to which its appropriations were being put. Most domestic intelligence issues have
not reached the courts, and in those cases when they have reached the courts, the
judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them.[65][66]
Post-COINTELPRO operations
While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing FBI
actions indicate that post-COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.
[67][68][69] Documents released under the FOIA show that the FBI tracked the late David
Halberstama Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and authorfor more than two decades.[70]
"Counterterrorism" guidelines implemented during the Reagan administration have been described
as allowing a return to COINTELPRO tactics.[71][pages needed] Some radical groups accuse
factional opponents of being FBI informants or assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.[72]
The IG report found these "troubling" FBI practices between 2001 and 2006. In some cases, the
FBI conducted investigations of people affiliated with activist groups for "factually weak" reasons.
Also, the FBI extended investigations of some of the groups "without adequate basis" and
improperly kept information about activist groups in its files. The IG report also found that FBI
Director Robert Mueller III provided inaccurate congressional testimony about one of the
investigations, but this inaccuracy may have been due to his relying on what FBI officials told him.
[73]
Several authors have accused the FBI of continuing to deploy COINTELPRO-like tactics against
radical groups after the official COINTELPRO operations were ended. Several authors have
suggested the American Indian Movement (AIM) has been a target of these operations.
Authors such as Ward Churchill, Rex Weyler, and Peter Matthiessen allege that the federal
government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that
this motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.
[74][75][76][77][78] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken
against activist groups.[78][79][80] Caroline Woidat says that, with respect to Native Americans,
COINTELPRO should be understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have
been viewed and have viewed the world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory."[81]
Other authors argue that while some conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO are unfounded,
the issue of ongoing government surveillance and repression is real.[82][83]

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 34
25 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

References

"I. Introduction and Summary" (PDF). Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans -

Church Committee final report. United States Senate website. II. United States
Government. 1976-04-26. p. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-04-18.
Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Wolf, Paul. "COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story". Archive.org. World Conference
Against Racism, Durbin SA.
Jalon, Allan M. (2006-03-08). "A break-in to end all break-ins; In 1971, stolen FBI files
exposed the government's domestic spying program.". Los Angeles Times. Tribune
Company. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Jeffreys-Jones,
Rhodri
(208).
The
FBI.
Yale
University
Press.
p. 189.
ISBN 9780300142846.
COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption - IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE F.B.I. PAPERS
"A Huey P. Newton Story - Actions - COINTELPRO". PBS. Archived from the original on
2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
Weiner, Tim (2012). Enemies : A History of the FBI (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
ISBN 9781400067480., p. 196. "Sullivan would become Hoover's field marshal in matters
of national security, chief of FBI intelligence, and commandant of COINTELPRO. In that top
secret and tightly compartmentalized world, an FBI inside of the FBI, Sullivan served as the
executor of Hoover's most clandestine and recondite demands."
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 233. "RFK knew much more about this surveillance than he
ever admitted. He personally renewed his authorization for the taps on Levison's office,
and he approved Hoover's request to tap Levison's home telephone, where King called late
at night several times a week."
Herst, Burton (2007) Bobby and J. Edgar, p. 372.
Herst (2007), pp. 372374
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 195
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 198. "On October 2, 1956, Hoover stepped up the FBI's longstanding surveillance of black civil rights activists. He sent a COINTELPRO memo to the
field, warning that the Communist Party was seeking to infiltrate the movement."
David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito, Black Maverick: T.R.M. Howard's Fight for Civil
Rights and Economic Power (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 148, 15459.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 200.
Gage, Beverly (2014-11-11). "What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals". The New
York Times. Retrieved 2015-01-09.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 235.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 236. "The bugs got quick results. When King traveled, as he
did constantly in the ensuing weeks, to Washington, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, and Honolulu,
the Bureau planted hidden microphones in his hotel rooms. The FBI placed a total of eight
wiretaps and sixteen bugs on King."
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999), p. 524-529
Adams, Cecil M. (2003-05-02). "Was Martin Luther King, Jr. a plagiarist?". Washington
Post. Retrieved 2006-06-06.
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999) p. 527-529
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999), p. 243
Gregory Kane, "FBI should acknowledge complicity in the assassination of Malcolm X" The
Baltimore Sun, May 14, 2000
Toure "Malcolm X: Criminal, Minister, Humanist, Martyr" The New York Times, June 17,
2011

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 35
26 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

James W. Douglass "The Converging Martyrdom of Malcolm and Martin" Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. Lecture, Princeton Theological Seminary, March 29, 2006
"Guide to the Microfilm Edition of FBI Surveillance Files: Black Extremist Organizations,
Part 1" Lexis-Nexis
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 271.
"The FBI Sets Goals for COINTELPRO" American Social History Project, City University of
New York
Rob Warden "Hoover Rated Carmichael As 'Black Messiah'" Chicago Daily News, Feb 10,
1976
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 272. "Some 1,500 army intelligence officers in civilian clothing
undertook the surveillance of some 100,000 American citizens. Army intelligence shared all
their reports over the next three years. The CIA tracked antiwar leaders and black militants
who traveled overseas, and it reported back to the FBI. The FBI, in turn, shared thousands
of selected files on Americans with army intelligence and the CIA. All three intelligence
services sent the names of Americans to the National Security Agency for inclusion on a
global watch list; the NSA relayed back to the FBI hundreds of transcripts of intercepted
telephone calls to and from suspect Americans."
McKnight, Last Crusade, pp. 2628. "By March the Hoover Bureau's campaign against King
was virtually on a total war footing. In a March 21 'urgent' teletype, Hoover urged all field
offices involved in the POCAM project to exploit every tactic in the bureau's arsenal of
covert political warfare to bring down King and the SCLC."
"Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of
Americans". United States Senate. Retrieved 2010-12-01.
See, for example, Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); Rugiero v. U.S. Dept. of Justice,
257 F.3d 534, 546 (2001).[dead link]
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/
"A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO", Albion Monitor, Retrieved July 13, 2007. Archived
September 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 293
The COINTELPRO Papers - Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the
United States by Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall. South End Press.
Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Final Report of the Senate Committee
to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities
Various Church Committee reports reproduced online at ICDC: Final Report, 2A; Final
Report,2Cb; Final Report, 3A; Final Report, 3G. Various COINTELPRO documents
reproduced online at ICDC: CPUSA; SWP; Black Nationalist; White Hate; New Left; Puerto
Rico. Archived January 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
Blackstock, Nelson. COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom, Pathfinder,
New York. 1975. p. 111.
Michael Newton. Famous Assassinations in World History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, p.
205. ISBN 1610692853
THE CHICAGO CRIME SCENES PROJECT: FRED HAMPTON
The FBI'S Covert Action Program to Destroy the Black Panther Party
FBI Secrets: An Agent's Expose. M. Wesley Swearingen. Boston. South End Press. 1995.
Special Agent Gregg York: "We expected about twenty Panthers to be in the apartment
when the police raided the place. Only two of those black nigger fuckers were killed, Fred
Hampton and Mark Clark."
Ward Churchill (2002), Agents of Repression (Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars
Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement ed.), South End Press,
ISBN 978-0896086463, OCLC 50985124, 0896086461
"Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
Intelligence Activities-Book III" [The Church Report], US Senate, 1976
Bin Wahad, Dhoruba. Still Black, Still Strong. Semiotext, 1993, pp. 18-19

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 36
27 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Brown, Elaine. A Taste of Power: A Black Woman's Story. New York: Doubleday, 1992, pp.
204-06
Paul Wolf, "COINTELPRO", ICDC
"Former Black Panther freed after 27 years in jail". CNN. Archived from the original on
2010-11-18. Retrieved April 30, 2010.
In re Pratt, 82 Cal
Alexander Cockburn; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press.
Verso. p. 69. ISBN 978-1-85984-139-6.
FBI document, 19 July 1966, DeLoach to Sullivan re: "Black Bag" Jobs.
[1]
FBI document, 27 May 1969, "Director FBI to SAC San Francisco", available at the FBI
reading room.
FBI document, 16 September 1970, Director FBI to SAC's in Baltimore, Detroit, Los
Angeles, New Haven, San Francisco, and Washington Field Office. Available at the FBI
reading room.
Gary May, The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Luzzo, Yale
University Press, 2005.
"Jonathan Yardley". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18.
Retrieved April 30, 2010.
Joanne Giannino. "Viola Liuzzo". Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. Archived
from the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-09-29.
Kay Houston. "The Detroit housewife who moved a nation toward racial justice". The
Detroit News, Rearview Mirror. Archived from the original on 1999-04-27.
"Uncommon Courage: The Viola Liuzzo Story". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13.
Mary Stanton (2000). From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo.
University of Georgia Press. p. 190.
Noam Chomsky, "Triumphs of Democracy", Excerpted from Language and Responsibility
Watergate and the Secret Army Organization - msg#00404 - culture.discuss.cia-drugs
1972
"Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans Book II, Final Report of the Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities United
States Senate (Church Committee)". United States Senate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
"Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA.". Slate. Retrieved May 11,
2006.
David Cunningham. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI.
University of California Press, 2005: "However, strong suspicions lingered that the
program's tactics were sustained on a less formal basissuspicions sometimes furthered
by agents themselves, who periodically claimed that counterintelligence activities were
continuing, though in a manner undocumented within Bureau files."; Hobson v. Brennan,
646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C.,1986)
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in
America. University of California Press, 2001: "Although the FBI officially discontinued
COINTELPRO immediately after the Pennsylvania disclosures "for security reasons," when
pressed by the Senate committee, the bureau acknowledged two new instances of
"Cointelpro-type" operations. The committee was left to discover a third, apparently illegal
operation on its own."
Athan G. Theoharis, et al. The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Greenwood
Publishing Group, 1999: "More recent controversies have focused on the adequacy of
recent restrictions on the Bureau's domestic intelligence operations. Disclosures of the
1970s that FBI agents continued to conduct break-ins, and of the 1980s that the FBI
targeted CISPES, again brought forth accusations of FBI abuses of powerand raised
questions of whether reforms of the 1970s had successfully exorcised the ghost of FBI
Director Hoover."

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 37
28 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

The Associated Press, "FBI tracked journalist for over 20 years". Toronto Star. November
7, 2008. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in
America. University of California Press, 2001: "The problem persists after Hoover."The
record before this court," Federal Magistrate Joan Lefkow stated in 1991, "shows that
despite regulations, orders and consent decrees prohibiting such activities, the FBI had
continued to collect information concerning only the exercise of free speech."
Mike Mosedale, "Bury My Heart," City Pages, Volume 21 - Issue 1002, 16 February 2000
"FBI Probes of Groups Were Improper, Justice Department Says". The San Jose Mercury
News. September 20, 2010. also reported at democracynow.org, 21 September 2010
Churchill, Ward, and Jim Vander Wall, (1990), The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from
the FBI's Secret Wars Against Domestic Dissent, Boston: South End Press, pp. xii, 303.
Churchill, Ward; and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars
against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, 1988, Boston, South
End Press.
Weyler, Rex. Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against First Nations.
Matthiessen, Peter, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, 1980, Viking.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy
Culture", The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006, pp. 454467
McQuinn, Jason. "Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism", Alternative Press Review,
Vol. 2, No. 3, Winter 1996
Horowitz, David. "Johnnie's Other O.J.", Front Page Magazine.com, September 1, 1997.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy
Culture", The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006. pp. 454467
Berlet, Chip. "The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear and Fascism?
Conspiracy Theories for Fun, Not for False Prophets", 1998, Political Research Associates
Berlet, Chip; and Matthew N. Lyons. 1998, "One key to litigating against government
prosecution of dissidents: Understanding the underlying assumptions", Parts 1 and 2,
Police Misconduct and Civil Rights Law Report (West Group), 5 (13), (JanuaryFebruary):
145153; and 5 (14), (MarchApril): 157162.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 38
29 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

CIA Mind Control Experiments


Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, and More
Taken from the website:
(http://www.wanttoknow.info/mind_control/cia_mind_control_experiments_sex_abuse)

Tragic, heartbreaking mass murders in recent years have spread fear and panic among the
general public. Yet some are questioning if there isn't more than
meets the eye with these cruel and bizarre events. Is it conceivable
that there might be a deeper agenda here?
This

essay

presents

undeniable

evidence

that

secret

government mind control programs have created assassins


out of unsuspecting citizens.
The astonishing excerpts below, taken verbatim from declassified
CIA documents, reveal detailed mind control experiments in highly secret, government-sponsored
experiments. Through hypnosis, drugs, and electric shock, CIA clinicians fractured personalities
and induced multiple personality disorder (MPD) also called dissociative identity disorder (DID).
These top secret experiments were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or
super spies programmed to carry out assassination, terrorist acts, sexual favors, and
more without conscious knowledge of what they were doing. The army of Manchurian
Candidates created may have played a key, hidden role in world politics.
To verify this startling information, links are provided to scanned images of the original CIA
documents. Instructions are also available here to order any of these documents directly from the
CIA using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Though dating from the 1950s and 60s, these revealing documents were not released for decades
for reasons of "national security." The U.S. government claims mind control experiments are no
longer being carried out, yet how can we know? The existence of these programs was denied for
decades, and certainly any recent documents would be classified secret under the rubric of
"national security."

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 39
30 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

A trusted CIA informant I know assures me that these programs are ongoing. These disturbing
methods are used by various countries in clandestine operations around the world. Many might
prefer not to look at these ugly wounds to the soul of our nation and world. Yet if we avoid or
ignore them, they are likely to grow and fester.
CIA document and page number: 190684, pp. 1, 4
Title: Outline of Special H Cases
Date: 7 January 1953
Page 1, Page 4
In a general request for volunteers [deleted names] volunteered for H [hypnosis]
experimentation and were originally tested on 21 May 1951. Both girls, at this time,
were nineteen years of age. These subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can
pass from a fully awake state to a deep H controlled state via the telephone, via some very
subtle signal that cannot be detected by other persons in the room, and without the other
individuals being able to note the change.
It has been shown clearly that physically individuals can be induced into H by telephone, by
receiving written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words. Control of those hypnotized
can be passed from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been
shown by experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for
information purposes, and that they can be conditioned to a point where they believe a change
in identity on their part even on the polygraph.

Note: This document shows that CIA experimenters were successful in hypnotizing young
women (19 years old in this case) to do things they would not do normally without any
memory afterward, sometimes even unwillingly. Though they volunteered, these women
were thus programmed to be Manchurian Candidates or super spies with no knowledge of
what these men were doing to them.

CIA document and page number: 17395, p. 18


Title: ESP Research
Date: Unknown
Link to view image of original: Click here
Learning models will be instituted in which the subject will be rewarded or punished for his
overall performance and reinforced in various ways by being told whether he was right, by

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 40
31 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

being told what the target was, with electric shock etc. ... In other cases drugs and
psychological tricks will be used to modify his attitudes. The experimenters will be
particularly interested in disassociative states, from the abaissement de niveau mental to
multiple personality in so-called mediums, and an attempt will be made to induce a number
of states of this kind, using hypnosis.

Note: This document provides proof that the CIA was was using drugs and electric shock in
attempting to induce MPD (multiple personality disorder). Though this document uses the
masculine "he" to describe the subject, other documents show that most of the subjects
used were young women who volunteered. The subjects were not informed about the
deeper aspects and implications for which they were being trained. If you view the original,
you will also find interesting information on ESP experiments.

CIA document and page number: 190691, p. 1, 2


Title: Hypnotic Experimentation and Research
Date: 10 February 1954
Link to view image of original: Page 1, Page 2
A posthypnotic of the night before (pointed finger, you will sleep) was enacted. Misses
[deleted] and [deleted] immediately progressed to a deep hypnotic state with no further
suggestion. Miss [deleted] was then instructed (having previously expressed a fear
of firearms in any fashion) that she would use every method at her disposal to
awaken miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic sleep), and failing this, she would
pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was instructed that her
rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to "kill" [deleted] for failing to
awaken.
Miss [deleted] carried out these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded pneumatic
pistol) gun at [deleted] and then proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions
were made, both were awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss
[deleted] was again handed the gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or
accept form the operator. She expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had
happened.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 41
32 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Miss [deleted] felt reluctant about participating further since she expressed her doubt as to
any useful purpose in further attendance. The Operator thereupon proceeded in full view of all
other subjects to explain to Miss [deleted] that he planned to induce a deep state of hypnosis
now. The reaction was as had been expected. Miss [deleted] excused herself to make a telephone
call (defense mechanism?). Upon her return a very positive approach was adopted by the operator
whereupon a deeper, much deeper state of hypnosis was obtained.
Immediately a posthypnotic was induced that when the operator accidently dropped a steel ball in
his hand to the floor ... Miss [deleted] would again go into hypnosis. Miss [deleted] then advised
that she must conclude her work for the evening. She arose to adjust her hair before the mirror.
The ball was dropped and she promptly slumped back into the chair and back into hypnosis. It is
the opinion of the operator the Miss [deleted] if properly trained (positive approach) will continue
to improve.

Note: Here we have proof that these women could be converted into unsuspecting and
even unwilling assassins. They could be programmed to assassinate anyone and would do
so without any conscious knowledge afterward. Note also the questionable status of
"volunteer" implied. Though these women originally volunteered, unwillingness to continue
could be manipulated by the men running the program.

CIA document and page number: 190527, pp. 1, 2


Title: SI and H Experimentation
Date: 25 September 1951
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2
Note: SI stands for sleep induction and H for hypnosis
Prior to actually beginning the more complex experiments, several simple post H were
worked with both of the girls participating. The first major experiment of the evening was
set up as follows without previous explanation to either [deleted] or [deleted]. Both
subjects were placed in a very deep trance state and while in this state, the following
instructions were given:
(A) [Deleted] was instructed that when she awakened, she was to procede to [deleted] room. She
was told that while there, she would receive a telephone call from an individual whom she would
know only as "Joe". This individual would engage her in a normal telephone conversation. During
this conversation, this individual would give her a code word and upon mentioning the

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 42
33 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

code word, [deleted] would go into a deep SI [sleep induction] trance state, but would
be "normal" in appearance with her eyes open.
[Deleted] was then told that upon the conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would
procede to the ladies room where she would meet a girl who was unknown to her. She was told
that she would strike up a conversation with this girl and during the conversation she would
mention the code word "New York" to this other girl, who, in turn, would give her a device and
further instructions which were to be carried out by [deleted]. She was told that after she carried
out the instructions, she was to return to the Operations Room, sit in the sofa and go immediately
into a deep sleep.
(B) [Deleted] was instructed that upon awakening, she would proceed to [deleted] room where
she would wait at the desk for a telephone call. Upon receiving the call, a person known as "Jim"
would engage her in normal conversation. During the course of the conversation, this individual
would mention a code word to [deleted]. When she heard this code word, she would pass into a SI
trance state, but would not close her eyes and remain perfectly normal and continue the
telephone conversation. She was told that upon conclusion of the telephone conversation, she
would then carry out the following instructions:
[Deleted] being in a complete SI state at this time, was then told to open her eyes and was shown
an electric timing device. She was informed that this timing device was an incendiary
bomb and was then instructed how to attach and set the device. After [deleted] had
indicated that she had learned how to set and attach the device, she was told to return to a sleep
state and further instructed that upon concluding the aforementioned conversation, she would
take the timing device which was in a briefcase and proceed to the ladies room.
In the ladies room, she would be met by a girl whom she had never seen who would identify
herself by the code word "New York." [Deleted] was then to show this individual how to
attach and set the timing device and further instructions would be given the individual
by [deleted] that the timing device was to be carried in the briefcase to [deleted] room,
placed in the nearest empty electric-light plug and concealed in the bottom, left-hand
drawer of [deleted] desk, with the device set for 82 seconds and turned on.
[Deleted] was further instructed to tell this other girl that as soon as the device had been set and
turned on, she was to take the briefcase, leave [deleted] room, go to the operations room and go
to the sofa and enter a deep sleep state. [Deleted] was further instructed that after completion of
instructing the other girl and the transferring to the other girl of the incendiary bomb, she was to
return at once to the operations room, sit on the sofa, and go into a deep sleep state.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 43
34 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

For a matter of record, immediately after the operation was begun it was noted that a member of
the charforce was cleaning the floor in the ladies room and subsequently, both [deleted] and
[deleted] had to be placed ... once again in a trance state and instructions changed from the
ladies room to Room 3. It should be noted that even with the change of locale in the transfer
point, the experiment was carried off perfectly without any difficulty or hesitation on the part of
either of the girls. Each girl acted out their part perfectly, the device was planted and set as
directed and both girls returned to the operations room, sat on the sofa and entered a deep sleep
state. Throughout, their movements were easy and natural.

Note: You will note the frequent use of "girls" (young women) in these programs. Do you
think the men in charge, having complete hypnotic control of these women, might have at
times taken advantage of them sexually? Yet this would never enter the official
documentation, with the one major exception below.

CIA document and page number: 140393, p. 1


Title: [Deleted]
Date: 9 July 1951
Link to view image of original: Click here
On 2 July 1951 approximately 1:00 p.m. the instruction began with [deleted] relating to the
student some of his sexual experiences. [Deleted] stated that he had constantly used
hypnotism as a means of inducing young girls to engage in sexual intercourse
with him. [Deleted], a performer in [deleted] orchestra, was forced to engage in sexual
intercourse with [deleted] while under the influence of hypnotism. [Deleted] stated that he
first put her into a hypnotic trance and then suggested to her that he was her husband and
that she desired sexual intercourse with him.

Note: This document shows that an instructor being used by the CIA took advantage of his
skill in hypnosis to sexually abuse young women without their having any knowledge of
being abused. How many CIA hypnotists did likewise? Do you think a man involved in
these programs might take advantage of a beautiful, young woman knowing she
would not remember afterward? Note that for some reason this document is not
available in the CIA's three CD set and must be ordered individually at this link. See the

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 44
35 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

What You Can Do section at the end of this page for suggestions on how we can stop this
abuse.

CIA document and page number: 17441, p.8


Title: Continuation of Studies of Hypnosis and Suggestibility
Date: Unknown
Link to view image of original: Click here
Preliminary clinical research during 1955-56 has yielded promising leads in terms
of knowledge of how hypnotizability can be influenced by pharmacological means.
Experiments involving altered personality function as a result of environmental manipulation
(chiefly sensory isolation) have yielded promising leads in terms of suggestibility and the
production

of

trance-like

states.

There

is

reason

to

believe

that

environmental

manipulations can affect tendencies for dissociative phenomenon to occur.

Note: "Dissociative phenomenon" refers to the ability of a person's consciousness to leave


and a new consciousness enter, thereby facilitation the creation of "alter" or multiple
personalities. Besides hypnosis, drugs and electric shocks were developed as means to
facilitate the creation of Manchurian Candidates.

CIA document and page number:17748, pp. 1, 2, 4, 6-9


Title: Report of Inspection of MKULTRA
Date: 26 July 1963
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2, Page 4, Page 6, Page 7, Page 8, Page 9.
It was deemed advisable to prepare the report of the MKULTRA program in one copy only, in
view of its unusual sensitivity. The MKULTRA activity is concerned with the research and
development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in
clandestine operation to control human behavior. MKULTRA was authorized by then Director
of Central Intelligence [DCI], Allen W. Dulles, in 1953.
The concepts involved in manipulating human behavior are found by many people both within and
outside the Agency to be distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 45
36 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

accomplishments both in research and operational employment. Some MKULTRA activities raise
questions of legality implicit in the original charter. A final phase of testing of MKULTRA
products places the rights and interests of U.S. citizens in jeopardy. Public disclosure of
some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce serious adverse reaction in U.S. public
opinion. The DCI's memorandum ... exempted MKULTRA from audit.
Over the ten-year life of the program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior
have been designated by the TSD management [Technical Services Division - under which
MKULTRA operated] as appropriate to investigation under the MKULTRA charter, including
radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology, and anthropology,
graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and materials.
TSD initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting U.S. citizens in 1955. TSD has
pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity of some of
the projects. The lack of consistent records precluded use of routine inspection procedures and
raised a variety of questions concerning management and fiscal controls.
There are just two individuals in TSD who have full substantive knowledge of the
program and most of that knowledge is unrecorded. In protecting both the sensitive
nature of the American intelligence capability to manipulate human behavior, they apply
"need to know" doctrine to their professional associates and to their clerical assistants
to a maximum degree.

Note: Why did only two people have full substantive knowledge of the program? Could it be
that sex abuse and political manipulations behind the scenes were so severe that no one
was to be trusted? Do you think we could trust those two individuals? CIA Director Richard
Helms, upon hearing there would be a Congressional investigation, ordered the destruction
of all documents from these unethical and at times illegal mind control programs in 1973.
He did not realize, however, that incriminating evidence remained in the financial files of the
agency, which are what you read here. We can only imagine what secrets the destroyed
documents held.

CIA document and page number: 87624, p. 3, 4 (also appended to 17748, p. 32, 33)
Title: Two Extremely Sensitive Research Programs

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 46
37 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Date: 3 April 1953


Link to view images of original: Page 3, Page 4
Approximately 6% of the projects are of such an ultra-sensitive nature that they cannot and
should not be handled by means of contracts which would associate CIA or the Government
with the work in question.
We intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible nontoxic aberrant mental state, the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for each
individual. This material could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting
information, implanting suggestion and other forms of mental control.
In a great many instances the work in field (a) must be conducted by individuals who are not and
should not be aware of our interest. In all cases dealing with field (b), it is mandatory that any
connections with the Agency should be known only to an absolute minimum number of people
who have been specifically cleared for this purpose.
Experience has shown that qualified, competent individuals in the field of pharmacological,
physiological, psychiatric and other biological sciences are most reluctant to enter into signed
agreements of any sort which connect them with this activity since such a connection would
jeopardize their professional reputations. Even internally in CIA, as few individuals as
possible should be aware of our interest in these fields and of the identity of those who
are working for us. At present, this results in ridiculous contracts, with cut-outs, which
do not spell out the scope or intent of the work.

Note: In the three CD set, this document is found appended to document 17748 on pp. 30
to 37.

CIA document and page number: 190885, p. 1


Title: None Given
Date:1 January 1950
Link to view image of original: Click here
Drug Project - A project in the isolation and synthesis of pure drugs for use in effecting
psychological

entry

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

and

control

Page 47
38 of 365
356

of

the

individual.

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Drugs and electricity - Research work on the effects of lysergic acid [LSD] on animals. Use
of electric shock and the encephalograph in interrogation. Particular emphasis on the
detection and prior use of electric shock and the 'guaranteed amnesia' resulting
from electric shock.

Hypnosis - Investigation of the possibilities of hypnotic and post-hypnotic control.

CIA document and page number: 140394, pp. 2, 3 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Interview with [Deleted]
Date: 25 February 1952
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here
Q: What are your experiences in general with hypnotism?
A: I have been a professional hypnotist for at least 15 years. At present, I am employed on
a very confidential basis two days a week.
Q: Can you obtain information from an individual, willing or unwilling, by
hypnotism?
A: Definitely, yes. Many of the medical cases I work on are involved in obtaining
personal, intimate information, and through hypnotism, I have been quite
successful in obtaining this. If an individual refuses to co-operate with hypnosis,
the doctors with whom I work use drugs, always sodium amytal.
Q: How far do you think individuals could be controlled by hypnosis?
A: This is a very difficult subject. Post-hypnotics will last twenty years and will be very
strong if re-enforced from time to time.
Q: Have you ever had any experience with drugs?
A: Yes, many times. I have worked with doctors using sodium amytal and pentothal and
have obtained hypnotic control after the drugs were used. In fact, many times drugs were

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 48
39 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

used for the purpose of obtaining hypnotic control.


Q: Do you have any ideas that hypnotism could be used as a weapon?
A: Yes, I have thought about this often. It could certainly be used in obtaining information
from recalcitrant people particularly with drugs. It could be used as a recruiting source for
special types of work. A good hypnotist running hypnotic shows for entertainment
would pick up a great many subjects, some of whom might be exceptionally good
subjects for us. These subjects could easily be tabbed and put to use.
Q: Have you ever been able to produce hypnosis without an individual's knowledge?
A: Yes, through the relaxing technique and on rare occasions [I've] been able to produce
hypnotism against a person's will. However, you cannot count on this and to attempt to
attach an individual who did not want to be hypnotized alone would be almost an impossible
task. In that type of case, I would use sodium amytal and/or sodium pentothal.
Q: How effective are post-hypnotics; over what distances and time can they be effective?
A: Properly used post-hypnotics will last twenty years. They can be made more effective by
re-enforcement from time to time. Post-hypnotics are not affected at all by time or travel or
distance away from the person who placed the post-hypnotic. As a rule, post-hypnotics
should be 100% effective in good subjects.
Q: Can individuals be made to do things under hypnosis that they would not otherwise?
A: Individuals could be taught to do anything including murder, suicide, etc. I do
believe that you could carry out acts that would be against an individual's moral
feelings if they were rightly, psychologically conditioned.

Note: Individuals can be hypnotized without their knowledge. They can be programmed to
commit murder, suicide, and much more. Think about the implications. How many "suicides"
of important people we've heard in the news were not really suicides? How many murders
were committed by people who didn't even realize they were assassins? How much has this
technology been used to manipulate world politics? Think about the Kennedys, Martin
Luther King, Jr., and possibly those involved with 9/11 and other major terrorist attacks.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 49
40 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

Note this document is not available in the three CD set and must be ordered individually at
this link.
CIA document and page number: 140401, pp. 6, 7 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Special Research, Bluebird
Date: 1 January 1952 (approximate)
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here
Set out below are specific problems which can only be resolved by experiment, testing and
research.
Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual,
willing or unwilling by application of SI [sleep induction] and H [hypnosis] techniques?
Can we create by post-H control an action contrary to an individual's basic moral
principles?
Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H condition in an
unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit?
Could we seize a subject and in the space of an hour or two by post-H control
have him crash an airplane, wreck a train, etc.?
Can we by H and SI techniques force a subject (unwilling or otherwise) to travel long
distances, commit specified acts and return to us or bring documents or materials?
Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?
Can we "alter" a person's personality?
Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer
that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs?
Is it possible to find a gas that can be used to gain SI control from a gas pencil, odorless,
colorless: one shot, etc.?
What are full details on "sleep-inducing machine"?
How can sodium A or P or any other sleep inducing agent be best concealed in a
normal or commonplace item, such as candy, cigarettes, liquer, wines, coffee, tea,
beer, gum water, aspirin tablets, common medicines, coke, tooth paste?
Can we, using SI and H extract complicated formula from scientists, engineers, etc., if
unwilling?

Note: Reading all of the declassified CIA documents listed in this essay suggests that the
answer to most, if not all of the questions above appears to be yes. Note that sleep
inducing agents were being placed in candy, aspirin, Coke, and more. Think about the

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 50
41 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

implications if even just a few of the men in these programs decided to use such things
outside of the office to manipulate others for their personal benefit. It's time that this
information be made public so we can all be aware of what's going on and work to stop the
abuses. Note for some reason this document is not available in the three CD set and must
be ordered individually at this link.

Science Digest Article, pp. 44 - 53 (Not a CIA document, but related to the mind control
programs)
Title: Hypnosis Comes of Age
Date: April 1971
Link to view full text of article: Click here
Psychologist G. H. Estabrooks reminisces about his long career as a hypnotist. Dr.
Estabrooks discusses how he "programmed" American spies with hypnosis and how he
helped businessmen and students with his skills. Dr. Estabrooks is a Rhodes Scholar. He
took his Doctorate at Harvard ('26), and has authored many articles and books on clinical
hypnosis and human behavior.

One of the most fascinating but dangerous applications of hypnosis is its use in military
intelligence. This is a field with which I am familiar through formulating guidelines for the
techniques used by the United States in two world wars. I was involved in preparing many
subjects for this work during World War II.
One successful case involved an Army Service Corps Captain whom we'll call George Smith.
Captain Smith had undergone months of training. He was an excellent subject but did not realize
it. I had removed from him, by post-hypnotic suggestion, all recollection of ever having
been hypnotized. Outside of myself, Colonel Brown was the only person who could hypnotize
Captain Smith. This is "locking." I performed it by saying to the hypnotized Captain: "Until further
orders from me, only Colonel Brown and I can hypnotize you. We will use a signal phrase 'the
moon is clear.' " The system is virtually foolproof.
By the 1920's, not only had they learned to apply post-hypnotic suggestion, [they] also
had learned how to split certain complex individuals into multiple personalities like
Jeckyl-Hydes.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 51
42 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

During World War II, I worked this technique with a vulnerable Marine lieutenant I'll call Jones.
Under the watchful eye of Marine Intelligence, I spilt his personality into Jones A and Jones B.
Jones A, once a "normal" working Marine, became entirely different. He talked communist doctrine
and meant it. He was welcomed enthusiastically by communist cells, was deliberately given a
dishonorable discharge by the Corps (which was in on the plot) and became a card-carrying party
member.
The joker was Jones B, the second personality, formerly apparent in the conscious Marine. Under
hypnosis, this Jones had been carefully coached by suggestion. Jones B was the deeper
personality, knew all the thoughts of Jones A, was a loyal American, and was "imprinted" to say
nothing during conscious phases. All I had to do was hypnotize the whole man, get in touch with
Jones B, the loyal American, and I had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp.

Note: This article shows that in the 1920s, U.S. military intelligence had already developed
the capability to cause split personalities. The created super spy or Manchurian Candidate
has been a reality for nearly a century, yet very few people know anything about it. These
unknowing spies could plant bombs, provide sexual favors, and even assassinate top
political leaders. Consider that many countries and key powerful, elite groups have had and
used this technology for many decades. Watch the movie Manchurian Candidate to see how
real it is.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 52
43 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

RESUME AND BIOGRAPHY OF PETITIONER AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


Present I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S.
sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy;
and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a
low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in
that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This assault began after the
handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed
to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with a person who declares
that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Over the course of 10
years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known actors and have spent 10 years trying to
validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to
cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to
comment
In 2009 Advanced Media Group Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work
of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years.
The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being
harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep
individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency
devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court of Appeals,
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of
Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations
included violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of
contracts relating to several business interests, harassment, extortion, fraud, etc.,. . Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. I was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for professional
services.
From 2002 to 2004 I engaged in full-time online day-trading of securities and the selling of
merchandise on eBay.
In 2000 to 2002 Advanced Media Group developed an array of marketing and communication
tools for wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs
for several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica.
In 1999 Advanced Media Group was solicited and paid to develop a comprehensive business
plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in
Lancaster, Pennsylvania by 2 Lancaster County restaurateurs. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of
Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt &
Shand building.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 53
44 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1998 I administered the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided
funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide
Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith
based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit
organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the
prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 Advanced Media Group had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the
time that I was controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Advanced Media Group was retained by
Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from
top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll
for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an
action plan to migrate the Information Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now
relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of
Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS
400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time
networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some
500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 to 1998 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, in efforts to stave off
a potential bankruptcy. I was responsible for implementing computerized accounting,
implementing Management Information Systems, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies and programs,
performance measurement reporting, and administrative and office procedures and logistics.
Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and
recorded record revenues.
In 1991 Advanced Media Group was elected to People to People International and the Citizen
Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The
program was founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to
work together and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program
administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In
1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private
foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern
Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the
world.
In 1990 Advanced Media Group had worked on a project to develop voice recognition systems for
the governments technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology)

and the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA of the Department of
Defense. I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was
published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry.
Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice
recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 54
45 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1989 I founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's, which at the time was a new and
advanced technology in its early stages of being commercialized from research and development.
We did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and
foreign companies. I performed services and contracts or prepared proposals for a host of
domestic and foreign companies including but not limited to: for the Department of Defense,
NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central
Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond
Buyers, the Library of Congress, Exxon, Tandy Computers/Radio Shack, and a host of others. I
also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive
mapping technologies, which is now Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping
software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for
Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the
manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly & Sons of Chicago, Illinois. American Helix was
later sold to KAO Industries. We were also the exclusive marketing agent and partner with a
Boston, Massachusetts software engineer in the selling of a software developed to diagnose and
test CD-ROM drives called CD-Diagnostics. The program was sold to both domestic and foreign
companies and was then under review for company-wide distribution by Microsoft Corporation.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained my services as executive producer of a
motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format;
the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept
for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and
marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed
marketing and patent research for the development and commercialization of equipment that we
intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry featuring the digital technology.
Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We
had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading
engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was
one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi,
a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power
Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture.
It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time. Tony
Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS
trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound
systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD
is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 55
46 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a
major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100
million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations
from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to
raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were
retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their post production
Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages
for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that
was with Commonwealth National Bank. We were quickly seeking commitments for real estate
deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local developers
seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle
a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets), and Drew Anthon of Eden Resort Inn.
We were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG) and served as Executive Vice
President and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd., the investment advisory subsidiary. FMG was a
large financial services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one
location. We had developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for
equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants,
attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of
our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had
approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in
excess of $50 million under management, and our advisors were generating almost $4 million of
commissions per year, which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had
acquired an interest in our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million in
1987.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependent on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL., and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of
the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with
other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for
our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The
well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he
looked
forward
to
reviewing
the
tapes
for
any
hopeful
recruits.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 56
47 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial
Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150
professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center.
Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work
together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and
investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the
future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a
Financial Planning department within their bank.
From 1982 to 1985 I was a financial planner for IDS/American Express and licensed in both
securities and insurances.
From 1977 to 1981 I operated SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating and was was a contractor
responsible for painting and renovating residential, commercial and residential properties and
facilities in Lancaster County.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 57
48 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

____________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS has been
served this _____________________________________, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or
by electronic mail upon, or by hand deliver to:

Date: August 21, 2016


___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 58
49 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401

Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 59
50 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

RESUME AND BIOGRAPHY OF PETITIONER AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


Present I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S.
sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy;
and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a
low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in
that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This assault began after the
handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed
to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with a person who declares
that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Over the course of 10
years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known actors and have spent 10 years trying to
validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to
cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to
comment
In 2009 Advanced Media Group Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,
Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work
of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years.
The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being
harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep
individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency
devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court of Appeals,
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of
Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations
included violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of
contracts relating to several business interests, harassment, extortion, fraud, etc.,. . Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. I was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for professional
services.
From 2002 to 2004 I engaged in full-time online day-trading of securities and the selling of
merchandise on eBay.
In 2000 to 2002 Advanced Media Group developed an array of marketing and communication
tools for wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs
for several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica.
In 1999 Advanced Media Group was solicited and paid to develop a comprehensive business
plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in
Lancaster, Pennsylvania by 2 Lancaster County restaurateurs. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of
Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt &
Shand building.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 60
51 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1998 I administered the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided
funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide
Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith
based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit
organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the
prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 Advanced Media Group had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the
time that I was controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Advanced Media Group was retained by
Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from
top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll
for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an
action plan to migrate the Information Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now
relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of
Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS
400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time
networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some
500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 to 1998 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, in efforts to stave off
a potential bankruptcy. I was responsible for implementing computerized accounting,
implementing Management Information Systems, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies and programs,
performance measurement reporting, and administrative and office procedures and logistics.
Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and
recorded record revenues.
In 1991 Advanced Media Group was elected to People to People International and the Citizen
Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The
program was founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to
work together and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program
administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In
1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private
foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern
Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the
world.
In 1990 Advanced Media Group had worked on a project to develop voice recognition systems for
the governments technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology)

and the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA of the Department of
Defense. I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was
published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry.
Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice
recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving telecommunications.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 61
52 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1989 I founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's, which at the time was a new and
advanced technology in its early stages of being commercialized from research and development.
We did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and
foreign companies. I performed services and contracts or prepared proposals for a host of
domestic and foreign companies including but not limited to: for the Department of Defense,
NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central
Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond
Buyers, the Library of Congress, Exxon, Tandy Computers/Radio Shack, and a host of others. I
also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive
mapping technologies, which is now Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping
software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for
Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the
manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly & Sons of Chicago, Illinois. American Helix was
later sold to KAO Industries. We were also the exclusive marketing agent and partner with a
Boston, Massachusetts software engineer in the selling of a software developed to diagnose and
test CD-ROM drives called CD-Diagnostics. The program was sold to both domestic and foreign
companies and was then under review for company-wide distribution by Microsoft Corporation.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained my services as executive producer of a
motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format;
the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept
for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and
marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed
marketing and patent research for the development and commercialization of equipment that we
intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry featuring the digital technology.
Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We
had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading
engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was
one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi,
a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power
Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture.
It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time. Tony
Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS
trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound
systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD
is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 62
53 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a
major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100
million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations
from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to
raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were
retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their post production
Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages
for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that
was with Commonwealth National Bank. We were quickly seeking commitments for real estate
deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local developers
seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle
a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets), and Drew Anthon of Eden Resort Inn.
We were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG) and served as Executive Vice
President and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd., the investment advisory subsidiary. FMG was a
large financial services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one
location. We had developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for
equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants,
attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of
our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had
approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in
excess of $50 million under management, and our advisors were generating almost $4 million of
commissions per year, which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had
acquired an interest in our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million in
1987.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependent on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL., and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of
the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with
other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for
our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The
well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he
looked
forward
to
reviewing
the
tapes
for
any
hopeful
recruits.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 63
54 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial
Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150
professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center.
Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work
together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and
investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the
future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a
Financial Planning department within their bank.
From 1982 to 1985 I was a financial planner for IDS/American Express and licensed in both
securities and insurances.
From 1977 to 1981 I operated SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating and was was a contractor
responsible for painting and renovating residential, commercial and residential properties and
facilities in Lancaster County.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 64
55 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

____________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS has been
served this _____________________________________, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or
by electronic mail upon, or by hand deliver to:

Date: August 21, 2016


___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 65
56 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242

ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 66
57 of 365
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Federal Habeus
Habeas Corpus Statutes Prescribed In
in 28 2242

EXHBIT

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 67
50 of 365
58
318
319
356

Monday August 22, 2016

EIR Volume 32, Number 33, August 26, 2005

http://www.larouchepub.com/eirtoc/2005/eirtoc_3233.html

Published by Advanced Media Group

August 19, 2016 Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Intelligence
Review
Prescribed
In 28
2242

| Contents of Other Recent Issues |


Volume 32, Number 33, August 26, 2005

Cheney's `Spoon-Benders'
Pushing Nuclear Armageddon
Leading figures within the U.S. military's Special
Operations community have promoted the application of
New Age and outright Satanic practices to warfare. Some
of the top-secret programs funded by taxpayer dollars
over the past 25 years betray a significant degree of
"spoon-bending" lunacy. Others lead directly to the
doorsteps of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. Jeffrey
Steinberg reports.

Abu Ghraib, Satanists,


and Spoon-Benders
`We've Got To Bring the
Hammer Down on Iran'
An interview with Gen. Paul Vallely (ret.).

Cheney Wants War Against Iran Now


Lyndon LaRouche gave this interview on Aug. 17 to
Lebanese television station NewTV SAT, hosted by Maria
Maalouf.

Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military


A reprint of a July 2, 1999 article from EIR, which
exposed the role of satanist and alleged pedophile Lt.

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Dick Cheney's Sponn-Benders

1 of 4

Page 68
59 of 365
356

Cover Page

Monday August 22, 2016


August 26, 2005

8/20/2016 2:59 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

1 of 8

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Published by Advanced Media Group

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

This article appears in the August 26, 2005 issue of Executive


Intelligence Review.

Cheney's `Spoon-Benders'
Pushing Nuclear Armageddon
by Jeffrey Steinberg
Sometime in late 1980, then-Col. Paul E. Vallely, the Commander of the
7th Psychological Operations Group, United States Army Reserve,
Presidio of San Francisco, Ca., co-authored a discussion paper, which
received wide and controversial attention within the U.S. military,
particularly within the Special Operations community. The paper was
titled "From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory," and it
presented a Nietzschean scheme for waging perpetual psychological
warfare against friend and enemy populations alike, and even against
the American people.
The "MindWar" paper was provoked by an article by Lt. Col. John
Alexander, which appeared in the December 1980 edition of Military
Review, advocating the introduction of ESP (extra-sensory perception),
"tele-pathetic behavior modification," para-psychology, psychokinesis
("mind over matter"), remote viewing, out of body experiences, and
other New Age and occult practices into U.S. military intelligence.
Alexander's paper was titled "The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up,
Spock."
But the subsequent paper co-authored by Vallely went way beyond
ESP and the other paranormal techniques advocated by Alexander:
"Strategic MindWar must begin the moment war is considered to be
inevitable," the document stated. "It must seek out the attention of the
enemy nation through every available medium, and it must strike at the
nation's potential soldiers before they put on their uniforms. It is in their
homes and their communities that they are most vulnerable to
MindWar....
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued, "MindWar must be
strategic in emphasis, with tactical applications playing a reinforcing,
supplementary role. In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to
friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globeneither through
primitive 'battlefield' leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through
the weak, imprecise, and narrow effort of psychotronicsbut through
the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities
to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth. These media are,
of course the electronic mediatelevision and radio. State of the art
developments in satellite communication, video recording techniques,
and laser and optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a
penetration of the minds of the world such as would have been
inconceivable just a few years ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King
Arthur's magical sworded.], we have but to reach out and seize this
tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and
the integrity to enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur,
then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our
morality. If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have
no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level.
"MindWar must target all participants to be effective. It must not only
weaken the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens
the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to our people,

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
601of
69
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

2 of 8

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our
national interest in a specific war."
Leaving nothing to the imagination, the document concluded by
emphasizing that MindWar should employ subliminal brainwashing
technologies, and weapons that directly attack the targetted
population's central nervous system and brain functioning: "There are
some purely natural conditions under which minds may become more
or less receptive to ideas, and MindWar should take full advantage of
such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic activity, air
ionization, and extremely low frequency waves," the paper concluded.
The "MindWar" paper was disturbing, for reasons beyond its fascistic
and occultist content. For one thing, Colonel Vallely's co-author was a
PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader named Maj. Michael A.
Aquino. Five years before the circulation of the MindWar paper, Special
Forces Reserve officer Aquino had founded the Temple of Set, a
Satanic organization which was the successor to Anton Szandor
LeVay's Church of Satan. Aquino would soon be grabbing headlines,
which persisted throughout the 1980s, as a leading suspect in a
nationwide Satanic pedophile ring, that particularly targetted daycare
centers on such military bases as Fort Bragg and the Presidio (see
article, p. 21).
Furthermore, Vallely and Aquino's MindWar scheme is remarkably
similar to the Total Information Awareness (TIA) program launched by
the Donald Rumsfeld Pentagon, under the direction of Irangate figure
Adm. John Poindexter. Ostensibly, the Total Information Awareness
global propaganda and mega-data-mining plan was scrapped after a
series of negative news stories, but Pentagon sources have reported
that the program was merely "taken into a black box."
Indeed, on Aug. 16, 2005, The New York Times' Philip Shenon
revealed that a super-secret Pentagon "special action program" called
Able Danger had tracked Mohammed Atta and three of the other Sept.
11, 2001 hijackers a year prior to the attacks; but Pentagon lawyers
with the Special Operations Command refused to allow the information
to be shared with the FBI, for fear of exposing the data-mining program
to any public scrutiny. The Times learned of Able Danger from Lt. Col.
Anthony Schaffer, who was the program's liaison to the Defense
Intelligence Agency at the time.

'Nuke Iran!'
Colonel Vallely's association with Aquino did little to stall the former's
military career advancement. A West Point graduate, Vallely retired in
1991 as deputy commanding general of the U.S. Army of the Pacific.
From 1982-86, he headed the 351st Civil Affairs Command, placing him
in charge of all Special Forces, Psychological Warfare, and Civil Affairs
Military units in the Western United States and Hawaii.
Today, he is practicing what he and Satanist Aquino preached in the
MindWar paper, and is one of the leading propaganda assets in Vice
President Dick Cheney's push for military confrontation with Iranone
that could see the United States carry out the first pre-emptive nuclear
attack in history.
General Vallely, now retired from the military, is a senior military
commentator for Rupert Murdoch's shrill Fox TV News; is a "client" of
Benador Associates, the premier public relations firm for the
neo-conservative cabal in Washington; is the Military Committee
chairman for Frank Gaffney's neo-conned Center for Strategic Policy;
and is the co-founder, along with Gen. Thomas McInerney (USAF-ret.),
another Benador client, of the Iran Policy Committee. IPC is yet another
neo-con front group that: 1) promotes the Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), a

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
612of
70
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

3 of 8

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

group on the State Department's list of International Terrorist


Organizations (for assassinating a number of U.S. military officers in
Iran); and 2) demands U.S. military action to impose "regime change"
1n Tehran, through such measures as a massive bombing campaign
against Iran's purported secret nuclear weapons labs, and a U.S. Naval
blockade of the Straits of Hormuz. Recently General Vallely
co-authored a book with General McInerney, titled EndgameBlueprint
for Victory for Winning the War on Terror, which borrows,
philosophically, from his and Aquino's original MindWar rant (see
interview with Vallely on p. 13).

The 'Jedi Warriors'


General Vallely, Colonel Alexander, and Lt. Colonel Aquino (ret.) are
but three leading figures within the Special Operations community, who
have promoted the application of New Age and outright Satanic
practices to the art of war, conducting experimental programs aimed at
creating a Nietzschean "bermensch warrior."
In preparation for this article, EIR has interviewed a number of senior
retired military and intelligence officers, who have identified, from their
own personal experiences, a number of other leading military officers
who promoted these efforts and funnelled massive amounts of
Pentagon money into "black programs," testing the military applications
of a whole range of bizarre "non-lethal" techniques and technologies.
Some of the top-secret programs funded by taxpayer dollars over the
past 25 years betray a significant degree of outright "spoon-bending"
lunacy. Others lead directly to the doorsteps of Guantanamo Bay and
Abu Ghraib military detention centers, where prisoners have been
turned into human guinea pigs for experimental torture techniques,
drawn from the same New Age bag of tricks.
And The New Yorker magazine investigative journalist Seymour Hersh,
in a Jan. 24-31, 2005 article on "The Coming Wars," mooted that the
Special Forces "black programs" may now have ventured into the field
of "pseudo-gang warfare," in which counterinsurgency methods blur
with insurgency.
Quoting from a September 2003 San Francisco Chronicle article by
Naval Postgraduate School defense analyst and Pentagon
counterinsurgency advisor John Arquilla, Hersh hinted that U.S. Special
Forces units were being unleashed to create their own terrorist "pseudo
gangs" to more easily infiltrate terrorist groups like al-Qaeda. Arquilla
wrote: "When conventional military operations and bombing failed to
defeat the Mau Mau insurgency in Kenya in the 1950s, the British
formed teams of friendly Kikuyu tribesmen who went about pretending
to be terrorists. These 'pseudo gangs,' as they were called, swiftly
threw the Mau Mau on the defensive, either by befriending and then
ambushing bands of fighters or by guiding bombers to the terrorists'
camps. What worked in Kenya a half-century ago has a wonderful
chance of undermining trust and recruitment among today's terror
networks. Forming new pseudo gangs should not be difficult."
Arquilla added, for good measure: "If a confused young man from Marin
County can join up with al-Qaeda [a reference to John Walker Lindh,
the so-called American Talibanied.], think what professional
operatives might do."

The 'Gang of Four'


Four of the names most often cited as promoters of programs like the
"Goat Lab," the "Jedi Warriors," "Grill Flame," "Task Force Delta," and
the "First Earth Battalion," have held top posts within the military
intelligence and Special Operations commands:

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
623of
71
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

4 of 8

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

Gen. Albert Stubblebine III was the head of U.S. Army Intelligence,
INSCOM (Intelligence and Security Command), from 1981-84, during
which time he launched a series of secret projects at Fort Meade, Md.,
involving remote viewing and other occult practices. General
Stubblebine was, perhaps, the U.S. Army's most senior and loudest
advocate of the full gamut of New Age warfare.
Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the current U.S. Army Chief of Staff, was
Commanding General of the Joint Special Operations Command
(1994-96), Commander of the United States Army Special Operations
Command (1996-97), and Commander in Chief of the United States
Special Operations Command (1997-2000). According to a
well-researched book exposing the New Age penetration of the U.S.
military, The Men Who Stare at Goats, by Jon Ronson (Simon &
Schuster, New York, 2004), General Schoomaker has created a
think-tank, under the sponsorship of the SOC office, to expand the
application of these bizarre occult and para-normal operations
throughout the U.S. Army, as his contribution to President George W.
Bush's Global War on Terrorism (GWOT).
Gen. Wayne Downing also was the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S.
Special Operations Command, and earlier directed all special
operations during the December 1989 invasion of Panama, when some
of the MindWar techniques were used, during the siege of the Vatican
compound where Gen. Manuel Noriega had taken refuge. Following the
attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Downing was named National Director and
Deputy National Security Advisor for Combatting Terrorism in the
Bush-Cheney White House, a post he held until June 2002.
According to military sources, General Downing left the White House as
the result of a conflict with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, over plans for the
invasion of Iraq. Downing had argued that Saddam Hussein could be
overthrown by a massive "shock and awe" bombing campaign, followed
by an invasion by a force of no more than 25,000 Special Forces
troops. The "Downing Plan" was rejected by the Chiefs as "sheer
madness," according to one senior military source familiar with the
events.
Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin was the Commanding General of the
U.S. Army Special Operations Command (Airborne) at Fort Bragg,
N.C., from 1998-2000. Prior to that, he was the Commander of the elite
counter-terror unit, Delta Force, from 1992-95. He was, in that capacity,
in charge of the Special Forces units in Mogadishu, Somalia, during the
famous 1993 "Black Hawk Down" incident, in which a number of
Special Forces soldiers were beaten to death by warlords, and dragged
through the streets of the city. Here, some of Lt. Col. John Alexander's
non-lethal systems, including "Sticky Foam," were directly put to the
combat testand failed. From March 2000 until June 2003, General
Boykin headed the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center.
He was then named Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence,
a post he still holds. According to The New Yorker piece by Hersh,
Boykin and his immediate boss, Undersecretary of Defense for
Intelligence Stephen Cambone, are directly in charge of the Special
Operations search-and-kill squads touted by John Arquilla in his
pseudo-gang promo.
Shortly after his appointment to the Deputy Undersecretary position,
General Boykin drew fire, for remarks he deliveredin uniformat a
fundamentalist Christian church, in which he smeared Islam as a
"Satanic" religion, and characterized the U.S. invasion of Iraq as a
religious "crusade." He also said that "God had placed George W.
Bush" into the Presidency, provoking serious debates about his own
sanity and a Pentagon Inspector General's Office probe.

First Earth BattalionWhere It All Began


Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
634of
72
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

5 of 8

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

According to author Jon Ronson, in 1977, Lt. Col. Jim Channon, a


Vietnam War combat veteran, wrote a letter to Lt. Gen. Walter Kerwin,
then the U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, proposing a fact-finding
mission to unearth ways for the U.S. military to become more
"cunning." Channon was given an open-ended assignment, a small
Pentagon budget, and spent the next two years, by his own accounts,
exploring the depths of the New Age movement, seeking military
applications. Channon visited over 150 New Age facilities during his
travels, with such countercultural names as: Gentle Wind, Integral
Chuan Institute, Dayspring, Inc., The Center of Release and
Integration, Postural Integration Reichian Rebirthing, the New Age
Awareness Fair, Beyond Jogging, Aikido with Ki, the Biofeedback
Center of Berkeley, and the Esalen Institute.
Channon particularly spent a good deal of time training under Michael
Murphy, the co-founder of Esalen, which was the leading West Coast
New Age psychological experimentation center, testing a wide array of
mind-control methods, many involving the use of psychotropic drugs.
Cultist mass murderer Charles Manson spent Aug. 5, 1969 at Esalen,
just four days before he unleashed the "Helter Skelter" murder spree,
for which he is still serving a lifetime jail sentence. Manson had been
tracked, from his years in state prison, by military psychologists, who
were studying behavioral patterns of what they dubbed the
"pathologically violent five percent."
In 1979, Lt. Colonel Channon presented his findings to the Army brass
in a 125-page document, complete with slides, called "The First Earth
Battalion." While the document was laced with New Age vocabulary
("The First Earth is not mission oriented, it is potential oriented. That
means we shall continue to look everywhere to find non-destructive
methods of control."), Channon did propose an array of non-lethal
techniques that would be soon adopted by the military, including the
use of atonal noises as a form of combat psychological warfare, oriental
martial arts and spiritualist instruction, and widespread experimentation
with psychoelectronics and other means of debilitating enemy forces.
Channon's First Earth Battalion slide show was brought to General
Stubblebine, the head of INSCOM, by Colonel Alexander, the author of
the Military Review article on "The New Mental Battlefield," and, by
1981, Stubblebine established a secret "psychic spies unit" at Fort
Meade, to test out such dubious techniques as remote viewing.
Two years later, General Stubblebine traveled to Fort Bragg, to pitch
the Channon/Alexander program to the top leadership of the Special
Operations community. By now, Stubblebine was convinced that, with
the application of the right "mind over matter" techniques, he could
personally walk through walls. As of this writing, he has not yet
apparently succeeded. The Fort Bragg session, as he would later
recount it to author Ronson, was a fiasco, and no action was taken to
implement his programor so Stubblebine thought.
In reality, Fort Bragg, by 1978, was already a hotbed of mind-war
experimentation. Among the programs carried out at remote corners of
the sprawling special operations base: the Goat Lab, where a team of
New Age-trained Special Forces soldiers attempted to burst the hearts
of goats, in an adjacent holding pen, through the power of psychic
concentration. Veterinarians working on the base were horrified that
Special Forces planes were airlifting goats up from Central America,
without going through the normal Customs inspections. The goats were
used in the training of combat medics. The goats would be shot, their
limbs would be amputated, and, on some occasions, they were
"de-bleated" by having their tongues cut out or their throats slashed.
Then, they were subjected to the Goat Lab psychic warfare tests.
Keying off of Channon's blueprint, a Special Operations experimental
team, dubbed "Jedi Warriors," after the Star Wars craze, were trained in

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
645of
73
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

a wide array of Eastern oriental martial arts and meditation techniques,


combined with super-strenuous physical training programs. Outside
"experts" like Dr. Jim Hardt, were brought in to train the "Jedi Warriors"
to heighten their mental telepathy skills through Zen. Following Jim
Channon's First Earth Battalion recipe, Stuart Heller, a New Age
psychologist, who gave classes in stress control to corporate
executives and officials at NASA, was brought in to provide similar
schooling to the commandos. Channon had been introduced to Heller
by Marilyn Ferguson, the author of the 1980 book The Aquarian
Conspiracy, which peddled a New Age version of H.G. Wells' original
Open Conspiracy concept of mass social control and cultural paradigmshifts.
Not all the instructors of the "Jedi Warriors" were counterculture
psychologists. Michael Echanis, a Green Beret who was badly
wounded in Vietnam, but later developed advanced martial art skills,
was brought in to train the "Jedi" in Hwa Rang Do, a combat technique
that emphasized "invisibility." Echanis would be killed in 1978 in
Nicaragua, while working as a mercenary for the regime of Anastasio
Somoza. He had been the martial arts editor of Soldier of Fortune
magazine, a well-known hiring hall for ex-soldiers and wanna-be's,
seeking their fortunes as mercenaries.
By 1983, between the INSCOM program and the black box efforts at
Fort Bragg, a fairly extensive network of military "spoon-benders" had
been assembled, to the point that Task Force Delta was created, to
stage quarterly meetings of as many as 300 military occult practitioners,
at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Col. Frank Burns launched Meta
Network, one of the first "chat rooms" run through DARPA's (Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency) computer networking system,
that would ultimately evolve into the internet.
The scheme to create a breed of Nietzschean "super soldiers"
employed some very far-out characters, like the Israeli "spoon-bender"
Uri Geller, a one-time stage magician, who was brought into the U.S.
intelligence community under the original patronage of Dr. Andrija
Puharich, a doctor who had been conducting work on parapsychology
and telepathy for the U.S. Army's Psychological Warfare Division, since
the 1950s. Dr. Puharich ran the Round Table Foundation of
Electrobiology, which experimented with the manipulation of brain
waves. He worked closely with Warren S. McCulloch, one of the
founders of Cybernetics, and with the British intelligence counterculture
guru, Aldous Huxley.

Wolfowitz Peddles Non-Lethal Warfare


According to author Ronson, in an October 2001 interview in London,
Uri Geller confided to him that he had been "called back" to work for the
U.S. government, immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks. It seems that
the Bush Administration decided that the "psychic spies" could play a
productive role in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, and in efforts to
prevent a replay of the terror attacks on New York and Washington.
In fact, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had been a big
advocate of some of Alexander and Channon's ideas, while serving as
the chief policy advisor to then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney in the
George Herbert Walker Bush Pentagon. On March 10, 1991, Wolfowitz
wrote a memo to Cheney, "Do We Need a Non-Lethal Defense
Initiative?" in which he wrote, "A U.S. lead in non-lethal technologies
will increase our options and reinforce our position in the post-Cold War
world." While Wolfowitz apparently made no mention of the more
bizarre practices promoted by Colonel Alexander, the guru of the
non-lethal weaponry campaign, at the time of Wolfowitz's memo,
Alexander had retired from active duty, and had been named head of
the Non-Lethal Weapons Program at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus
6 of 8

Page
Page
656of
74
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

7 of 8

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

In 1990, Colonel Alexander had also come out with a book, The
Warrior's Edge, in which he promoted a variety of unconventional
methods to promote "human excellence and optimum performance"
among soldiers, based on a course he taught in 1983 called NeuroLinguistic Programming (NLP). Among the students in that course were
then-Senator and later Vice President Albert Gore, Gen. Max Thurman,
and General Stubblebine. By his own accounts, Alexander and Gore
became close friends in 1983, and remain so today.
Colonel Alexander wrote that the goal of The Warrior's Edge was to
"unlock the door to the extraordinary human potentials inherent in each
of us. To do this, we, like governments around the world, must take a
fresh look at non-traditional methods of affecting reality. We must raise
human consciousness of the potential power of the individual
body/mind systemthe power to manipulate reality. We must be willing
to retake control of our past, present, and ultimately, our future."
Uri Geller was not the only "psychic warrior" called back to government
service after 9/11. Jim Channon, the original First Earth Battalion New
Age super-soldier, according to author Ronson, began holding a series
of meetings in early 2004 with the new Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Pete
Schoomaker. Schoomaker had been commander of Special Forces at
Fort Bragg when the "Goat Lab" and "Jedi Warrior" programs were
under way. Ronson wrote that "The rumor was that General
Schoomaker was considering bringing Jim back from retirement to
create, or contribute to, a new and secret think-tank, designed to
encourage the army to take their minds further and further outside the
mainstream." Ronson described it as a revival of Task Force Delta.
Ronson soon received an e-mail from Channon, confirming the rumor,
and explaining that the think-tank idea had been floated "because
Rumsfeld has now openly asked for creative input on the war on
terrorism ... mmmm." Channon elaborated:
"The Army has requested my services to teach the most highly selected
Majors. The First Earth Battalion is the teaching exemplar of choice. I
have done that in the presence of General Pete Schoomaker.... I am in
contact with players who are or have recently been in Afghanistan and
Iraq. I have sent in exit strategy plans based on Earth Battalion ideas. I
talk weekly with a member of a stress control battalion in Iraq who
carries the manual and uses it to inform his teammates of their potential
service contributions...."

Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib ... and al-Qa-im


The International Committee of the Red Cross has published a series of
studies and sponsored several international conventions, to evaluate
just how "non-lethal" the non-lethal technologies are that have been
promoted by Alexander, Channon, and their ilk. According to a 1998
ICRC presentation before the European Parliament, non-lethal
weapons are simply defined as weapons with a less-than 25% fatality
rate. Such now widely used non-lethal weapons as lasers, extremely
low frequency (ELF) weapons, and various chemical, biological, and
audio stun weapons, can cause permanent damage, such as blindness,
deafness, and destruction of gastrointestinal systems, which, the ICRC
insists, require serious study and a new set of international treaties and
conventions.
Indeed, according to both Ronson and The New Yorker writer Jane
Mayer, many of the torture techniques employed at Guantanamo Bay,
at Abu Ghraib, and at such less-well-known locales as al-Qa-im near
the Syrian border in Iraq, are based on Channon and Alexander's
non-lethal schemes, but with lethal consequences in some cases.
Ronson confirmed that a facility at al-Qa-im was conducting
"interrogations" of captured Iraqi insurgents, after playing, non-stop, for

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
667of
75
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders' Pushing Nuclear Armageddon

Published by Advanced Media Group

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes


Exective
Prescribed
Intelligence
In 28
Review
2242

days at a time, the theme song from Barney the Purple Dinosaur, "I
Love You." Ronson is convinced that the music was a cover for
subliminal frequencies, very high- or very low-frequency sounds that
affect brain functioning, to break prisoners' resistance. The prisoners
were kept in metal shipping containers in the scorching sun, blindfolded
and in crouching positions, surrounded by barbed wire, with the music
(and subliminals) blaring.
In an article published in the July 11-18, 2005 issue of The New Yorker,
Mayer revealed that Special Forces psychologists from the Survival,
Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) program at the JFK Special
Warfare School at Fort Bragg had been brought to Guantanamo Bay, to
oversee interrogation strategies. The SERE psychologists formed a
core of the Behavioral Science Consultation Teams (BSCT, or
"Biscuits") that "reverse engineered" the techniques that were used on
Special Forces soldiers, to train them to survive enemy
torture/interrogations, as part of the advanced special warfare program
at Fort Bragg.
Jim Channon confirmed, in another e-mail exchange with author
Ronson, that many of the ideas adopted by the Army Intelligence
interrogators at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and al-Qa-im came right out
of his First Earth Battalion blueprint.

'Living Embodiment' of First Earth Battalion


At one point in his probe of the military's spoon-benders, author Jon
Ronson asked Stuart Heller, the friend of Marilyn Ferguson and Jim
Channon, if he could name one soldier who was "the living
embodiment" of the First Earth Battalion. Without a second thought,
Heller replied: "Bert Rodriguez." "Bert's one of the most spiritual guys
I've ever met," Heller told Ronson. "No. Spiritual is the wrong word.
He's occultic. He's like a walking embodiment of death. He can stop
you at a distance. He can influence physical events just with his mind. If
he catches your attention he can stop you without touching you."
As Jon Ronson reported, "In April 2001, Bert Rodriguez took on a new
student. His name was Ziad Jarrah. Ziad just turned up at the US 1
Fitness Center one day and said he had heard that Bert was good. Why
Ziad chose Bert, of all the martial arts instructors scattered around the
Florida shoreline, is a matter of speculation. Maybe Bert's uniquely
occultic reputation preceded him, or perhaps it was Bert's military
connections. Plus, Bert had once taught the head of security for a
Saudi prince. Maybe that was it."
Ziad Jarrah presented himself as a Lebanese businessman, who
traveled a great deal and wanted to protect himself. "I liked Ziad a lot,"
Rodriguez later told Ronson. "He was very humble, very quiet. He was
in good shape. Very diligent." Rodriguez taught Jarrah "the choke hold
and the kamikaze spirit. You need a code you'd die for, a do-or-die
desire." Rodriguez added, "Ziad was like Luke Skywalker. You know
when Luke walks the invisible path? You have to believe it's there. And
if you do believe it it is there. Yeah, Ziad believed it. He was like Luke
Skywalker."
Rodriguez trained Ziad Jarrah for six months, and gave him copies of
several knife-fighting books he had written. Jarrah shared them with a
friend, Marwan al-Shehhi, who boarded with him at the Panther Motel
and Apartments in Deerfield Beach, Fla.
On Sept. 11, 2001, Ziad Jarrah took control of United Airlines flight 93,
and crashed it in a field in Pennsylvania. Marwan al-Shehhi
commandeered United Airlines flight 175 and crashed it into the South
Tower of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan.

Dick Cheney's
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sponn-Benders
Writ of Habeus Corpus
8 of 8

Page
Page
678of
76
of365
356
8

Monday August 22,


26, 2016
2005
8/20/2016 2:55 AM

Federal Habeus
Habeas Corpus Statutes Prescribed In
in 28 2242

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom

From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603

www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as


Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
Published by Advanced Media Group June 2, 2016

______________________________________
August 19, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. Allstate Sworn Testimony of Stan J. Caterbone TRANSCRIPT Volume 2
and Volume 1 July 12, 2016
3. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19,
2015 Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons
in Support of the Many Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
4. Karen Stewart, NSA Whistleblower and Targeted Individual
5. There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths
6. EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its Corruption - Karen
Stewart
7. The Interview
8. NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light by Karen
Stewart
9. The Interview
10.
Julianne McKinney, US Army Intelligence Officer, Whistleblower,
and Targeted Individual
11.
Transcript Of Greg Szymanskis Interview With Julianne Mckinney
12.
Dr. Nick Begich, Author and Expert Researcher of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control
13.
October 1, 2015 Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment
Conference in Berlin, Germany

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 77
51 of 365
68
319
356

Monday August 22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom

From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603

www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as


Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
Published by Advanced Media Group June 2, 2016

______________________________________
August 19, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. Allstate Sworn Testimony of Stan J. Caterbone TRANSCRIPT Volume 2
and Volume 1 July 12, 2016
3. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19,
2015 Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons
in Support of the Many Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
4. Karen Stewart, NSA Whistleblower and Targeted Individual
5. There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths
6. EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its Corruption - Karen
Stewart
7. The Interview
8. NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light by Karen
Stewart
9. The Interview
10.
Julianne McKinney, US Army Intelligence Officer, Whistleblower,
and Targeted Individual
11.
Transcript Of Greg Szymanskis Interview With Julianne Mckinney
12.
Dr. Nick Begich, Author and Expert Researcher of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control
13.
October 1, 2015 Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment
Conference in Berlin, Germany

Stan
Caterbone
Writ of
Habeus Corpus
Mind J.
Control
Transcripts
UPDATE

Page
51
52
69
318
319
356
Page 178
of of
269365

Monday
August
22, 19,
2016
Friday
August
2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

__________________________________
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
________________________________
June 2, 2016

BACKGROUND
Stan J. Caterbone's International Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind
Control Relationships are outlined in the following statements and declarations, which have already
been proven and verified and have never been specifically contested in any court of law:
Stan J. Caterbone was a Federal Whistleblower in 1987 regarding ISC
The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was subject to in 1987
through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and
Summer of 1987 after the Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive Larry
Resch.
The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline with Ted Koppel and the
Financial Times of London in May, July, and September of 1991 was most likely initiated or was
corroborated by Lancaster Newspapers reporter Thomas Flannary.
Thomas Flannary's mysterious death in February of 2004 was either murder or was a cover story to
hide the fact that he was a CIA operative used to control the flow of information, disinformation, and
propaganda. It is highly subject that he began his career with Lancaster Newspapers in 1987 and is not
a native Lancastrian.
The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after the False Arrests of Stan
J. Caterbone.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page79
52
53
70
2 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

The official meeting with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler in September of
1987, which was solicited by Agent Eisler was an effort to illegally interrogate Stan J. Caterbone without
a legal subpoena.
In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch Stan J. Caterbone had
personally solicited a vast array of local, state, and federal officials, including the FBI and Congressman
Robert Walker, PA State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in the retaliation and slander
campaign that was in progress. There is credible linkage between the ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the same, and the participation of
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis, Judge James Cullen,
and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control before 2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his VICTIMIZATION of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was on the Board of
Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies through his company
S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill Clinton for his
Director of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public scrutiny for his role in
the ISC scandal.
In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
and during his televised confirmation hearings the was subject to brutal array of questions concerning
his participation in the ISC scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve both the Bush
Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until resigning in 2011.
There have been at least 3 documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone; 1987, 1991, and
2004, all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas P. Caterbone's passing in 1996 was the result of a
wrongful death claim by Fulton Bank. Samuel A. Caterbone was most likely an KULTRA murder tactic in
Santa Barbara, California on December 25, 1984. Samuel P. Caterbone was most likely the result of an
MKULTRA murder tactic on July 20,2001 in New York city.
The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal enterprise that
violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and antitrust statutes.
The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in U.S.
District Courts, specifically in the Eastern District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-4650, 1402559, and other related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page80
53
54
71
3 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF


STANLEY J. CATERBONE
(VOLUME II)

2
3
4
5
6
7

TAKEN BY:

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

BEFORE:

DIANE A. SMITH, REPORTER


NOTARY PUBLIC

DATE:

JUNE 28, 2016, 9:25 A.M.

PLACE:

LANCASTER BAR ASSOCIATION


28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE

16
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page81
54
55
72
1 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2
3
4

WITNESSES
NAME

EXAMINATION

STANLEY J. CATERBONE
BY:

MR. REESER

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page82
55
56
73
2 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, called as a witness, being


duly sworn, testified as follows:

EXAMINATION

4
5

THE WITNESS:

I wanted to try to give you some

background about why people are doing this to me.

MR. REESER:

THE WITNESS:

Okay.
Here's one of the first things.

This is a book written by the Chief of Police ex-wife.

BY MR. REESER:

10

Chief of Police of Lancaster?

11

Lancaster, yes.

She accused him of domestic

12

abuse, and I've had the book for over a year.

13

other thing is this book here.

14

right now to get her out of prison.

And the

I have the only live case

15

And why don't you read the title of the book.

16

Love, Murder and Corruption in Lancaster County,

17

My Story by Lisa Michelle Lambert and David Brown.

18

communicate with Dave Brown a couple times a week.

19

Who is David Brown?

20

Her attorney that wrote the book.

Now if you're

21

not familiar with this case, there were three teenagers

22

that were involved in a murder back in 1992.

23

federal judge named Stewart Dalzell released her saying

24

there was so much prosecutorial misconduct in the case that

25

she was actually innocent.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

In 1997, a

Now Pennsylvania appealed it,

Page
Page83
56
57
74
3 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

and they had to have another PCRA hearing in front of Larry

Stengel.

essentially, and she went back to prison.

Well, he found -- he reversed everything

Now last June, I filed an Amicus on her behalf as

to move it in the case.

appeal case to get her out of prison.

controversial that 38,000 people signed a petition from

Lancaster to impeach the judge.

They never impeached him.

And I currently have a 3rd Circuit


Now the case was so

Of course, they lost.

But in 1997, the attorney that

10

represented her had some dealings with me.

11

Christina Rainville.

12

Her name is

Now essentially my Amicus is based on a premise

13

that I suffered the same prosecutorial misconduct that she

14

suffered.

15

federal whistleblower for International Signal Control, the

16

firm selling arms to Iraq to a Black Ops Program with the

17

CIA and the NSA -- I blew the whistle in '87 -- they were

18

indicted in '91 -- and the fact that I'm a victim of mind

19

control, there's ample reason and sufficient evidence of

20

why people break into my house and steal my things and

21

break my things.

Now you couple that with the fact that I'm the

22

Now I presented transcripts from Nick Begich, who

23

is a renowned expert in mind control, Karen Stewart, who is

24

a former NSA whistleblower who suffers the same

25

symptomatology as me, and Julianne McKinney, who is a

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page84
57
58
75
4 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

former intelligence officer of the U.S. Army.

suffer the same symptoms that I do.

Security has been paying me disability benefits since 2008

for mind control.

5
6

They all

In addition, Social

Do you have a copy of the Disability

Determination?

Sure, I have it in here.

Can I take a look at it?

Yeah, it might take me a couple minutes to find

11

Sure.

12

This injunction was filed yesterday at 4:24 p.m.

10

it.

13

in the Lancaster County Courthouse.

14

documentation with SSA.

15

Now through the application process, I applied in April of

16

'09 and received a check for $21,000 in August.

17

se.

I have 191 pages of

Here is my letter, award letter.

I was pro

There were not psychiatric examinations.

18

May I take a look at that as you're talking?

19

Yes.

And there were no medical reports.

It was

20

all awarded on my documentation of mind control symptoms

21

and illnesses.

22

'09.

23

back one year, retroactive one year.

24

one year.

25

'05, which is when I declared that I became full-time

What they did was -- I applied in April of

They awarded me benefits in August of '09 and paid me


They can only do it

But they declared me disabled in December of

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page85
58
59
76
5 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

telepathic and under harassment with electromagnetic

weapons.

3
4

That's what the '05 date is.


So I see, you know, the letter saying that you

became disabled under our rules on December 1, 2005.

Right.

It doesn't say anything as to why.

No, they don't do that.

They only -- what they do

is they give you an award letter and it either says

physical or mental, nothing beyond that because of HIPAA.

10

But if you go through all the documentation I have of the

11

entire process, you'll notice that there's no medical

12

reports submitted.

13

Joe Pitts' office to try to get them to give me a

14

psychiatric evaluation because I thought it was required.

15

They wouldn't give me one.

16

for mental illness, impossible.

17

And I begged them -- in fact, I went to

So it's impossible for it to be


It's just not.

You don't have a document anywhere from the Social

18

Security Administration that says we've determined that

19

you're disabled because of this condition?

20

21

physical.

22

They don't do that.

It's either mental or

If I had one, I'd present it.


Yeah.

It seems to me I've seen things to the

23

contrary where there's been a determination that somebody

24

is disabled --

25

Well, they didn't give me any.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page86
59
60
77
6 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

-- for a particular reason.

Now my father collected disability.

He was a

victim of MKUltra.

What is that?

That's where mind control came from, a CIA

program.

It started in the '50s.

Okay.

You'll have to ask them.

I mean I understand what you're telling me about

10
11

Why was he a target?

your role as a federal whistleblower but -A

He was Navy, a very intelligent person.

He was a

12

member of the Air Gunners Squadron, which I have

13

documentation from him that he left, which is like a

14

special option.

15

school.

16

And he graduated with honors from their

So that could be why.


What I'd like to do is go back to what we were

17

doing before and discuss the items that were on Exhibit 1

18

that was marked at the first examination.

19

started with that, two things.

20

of the receipts from the items that were damaged or the

21

replacement items that you purchased?

22
23

Before I get

One, have you brought any

Can you guarantee me you're going to pay the

claim?

24

No.

25

No.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page87
60
61
78
7 of 365
34
318
319
356

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

1
2

Okay.

Second, I don't have the ability to make

that guarantee.

I mean I could say yes and I --

I'm not going to waste my time.

All right.

I didn't have to do it for previous insurance

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

claims like this.


Q

So I'm not going to do it for this one.

All right.

Second, you had sent me an email I

think indicating that you had other items to add?


A

Every day.

Seriously, every day.

injunction takes care of everything.


Q

I'm hoping this

So we'll see.

I'm not sure it has anything to do with this claim

but --

13

It has everything to do with everything.

14

All right.

15

Let me read you the relief I'm requesting,

16

And you filed --

emergency relief.

17

Filed in the 3rd Circuit you said?

18

No, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

19

Oh, okay.

20

I filed one in '09, and the judge ruled on it.

21

So

I'm hoping she will on this one.

22

What is the docket number?

23

I didn't get one yet.

24

Okay.

25

I'll read it.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

I just filed it yesterday.

Relief sought by Plaintiff.

Page
Page88
61
62
79
8 of 365
34
318
319
356

The

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

Complainant seeks immediate relief from the above in the

form of sanctions and fines for those guilty of extortion

and embezzlement and those withholding accounts

receivables.

law enforcement agencies that continue abuse of process.

Complainant seeks immediate relief from public officials

for obstructing justice and due process.

relief inasmuch as the Courts are able with regards to the

harassment and torture from those known of such crimes.

Complainant seeks immediate relief from the

Complainant seeks

10

The Complainant seeks relief from stalking and

11

harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement to make

12

sure households can identify all occupants and prove they

13

are entitled to the lease and/or deed.

14

seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his pro se

15

billings invoice.

16

the Complainant summary judgment in all cases filed before

17

the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas in retaliation

18

for the arrogance of both the local law enforcement

19

community and the judicial system for the systematic abuse

20

of process and the extreme nature of the obstruction of

21

justice, which in itself is responsible for putting the

22

Complainant's life in harm's way on a daily basis.

23

June 27th, 2016.

24
25

The Complainant

The Complainant seeks relief by awarding

All right.

Changing gears.

Going back to the

list here of items that you've submitted.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page89
62
63
80
9 of 365
34
318
319
356

Date,

I think we left

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

10

off talking about the cost of repairs for your computers

which were hacked.

going to move onto the next item, which is a wet dry vac.

So we talked about that.

Okay.

Tell me about that.

Let's see what they did to that one.

And we're

Oh, they

burnt the motor out.

Okay.

Oh, boy, that happened fairly recently.

When did that happen?


That

10

happened -- because I just replaced it.

11

March.

12

on Stonehill Road in Conestoga in 1995.

13

replaced it with was a compact unit.

14

broken was full-sized.

15

power motor.

16

I think the original price of the one I bought -- I want to

17

say it was 150.

I'm going to say

Now the wet dry vac I bought when I built my house


Now the one I

The one that was

I think it was, like, a two horse

The one I replaced it with I think was $69.

It was a Craftsman, the original one.

18

It was 21-years-old?

19

Yeah, yeah.

20

Okay.

21

Oh, yeah.

22

And one day you started -- you tried to use it and

23

Did you use it on a regular basis?

it didn't work?

24

25

work.

Yeah, worked the day before and then it didn't

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page90
63
64
81
10of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

11

Okay.

I guess it was February.

Cordless phone, tell me about that.


I have magicJack.

Are

you familiar with that?

No.

It's where you use the internet for your phone.

Like a Voice Over --

Yeah.

-- what do they call that -- VOI?

Only it's different in that they give you a module

10

that you connect to your computer.

11

All right.

12

Now what I did was -- they came out with a new

13

version where you connect it to your Comcast router so that

14

instead of -- before with the old version, you had to have

15

the computer on for the phone to work.

16

I upgraded to the new version and connected it to my

17

Comcast server.

18

So I went to Radio Shack and bought a new cordless phone.

19

Well, it lasted a month and doesn't work anymore.

So I switched over.

So that means the magicJack is live 24/7.

20

Did you take it back?

21

No.

22

Why not?

23

Just too busy.

What I do on that line -- I

24

forward it anyway to my cell phone number, and I was using

25

it just, you know, sporadically.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page91
64
65
82
11of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

12

1
2
3

I would think after a month they would -- they

would replace it?


A

They probably would.

priorities.

replace it.

I'm just too busy, just

I mean I could probably take it back now and

I would think so.

Oh, boy, what a mess that was.

Cable boxes and modem.


Okay.

Let's see.

I guess in February or March I went to upgrade all my cable

boxes.

And at the same time, somebody from Comcast told me

10

that if I hook up to Comcast Business I would get a more

11

secure internet connection and a faster connection.

12

hook up to Comcast Business on a 60 day trial.

13

me a box, a new -- or, in fact, no, they came out and

14

installed it -- a new router.

15

reversed everything and said no, it's not more secure.

16

I disconnected it.

17

my cable boxes, but they never worked.

18

back and forth to Comcast two or three times.

19

techs would come out.

20

I don't know if people put chips in them.

21

they just sabotaged them or what.

So I

They send

And after two weeks, they

Then I went to Comcast and upgraded all


I mean I was going
Service

They couldn't find the problem.

You don't know why they're not working?

23

Comcast doesn't even know why.

They couldn't

24

even -- I'd get billed for HBO for three months, and I

25

never had HBO.

I mean it wouldn't work.

Page
Page92
65
66
83
12of
of365
318
319
356
34

So

I don't know if

22

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

So

And I kept

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

13

getting on the phone with customer service spending two

hours -- one time two and a half hours, and it still didn't

work.

Okay.

That was probably two months ago, three months

They still couldn't fix it.


How long ago was that?

ago, after the first of the year, probably the second

quarter.

Are they still trying to fix the problem?

I stopped trying.

10

Okay.

11
12

I mean I just -- you know.

The 100 dollar cost to replace, is that

just the value of the cable boxes and the modems or modem?
A

Yeah, I guess what they did is they billed me.

13

Comcast Business billed me.

14

yeah, that's basically what it is.

They all billed me.

I mean,

15

They billed you more because it was a business --

16

Oh, yeah -- no, they billed me because they would

17

not accept the return of the modem.

18

then, and they wouldn't pick it up.

19
20
21
22

I couldn't return it

Do you have any written correspondence between

yourself and Comcast over the issue?


A

Yeah, I have notes.

I have -- yeah, I have emails

I guess, yeah.

23

Do you have any of them with you?

24

No.

25

Would you be willing to forward those to me?

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page93
66
67
84
13of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

14

that.

But it was a mess.

I even

think I recorded the one tech that came to my door.

He got

smart with me.

this.

Yeah, I can dig those up, something pertaining to


I mean I forget exactly.

I had to throw him off my property.

I'm probably going to butcher the pronunciation of


Is it Sakrete or Sakrete?
Oh, Sakrete, yeah.

Listen what they did.

had -- I was putting post holes -- putting posts in my back

yard for a six foot wooden fence.

And what these kids next

10

door were doing was they were going and wetting the bags,

11

ruining the whole bag.

12

know how heavy Sakrete is when it's hardened cement?

Now that's not the issue.

Do you

13

Yeah, I got a sense for that.

14

I had to break it up and put it in buckets and

15

take it out to the alley.

16

So basically they ruined the bags?

17

Oh, yeah.

18

Made them unusable?

19

Yeah.

20

All right.

21

Yeah.

22

Is that $4 a bag or --

23

Yeah.

And you have $12 there?

That's not the half of it.

They filled in

24

the holes before I could -- I had to dig the holes out two

25

or three times.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page94
67
68
85
14of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

15

When you say they, again who is they?

I assume it's the people next door.

They are the

ones who sic the pit bull on me that I had to go to the

hospital for two weeks ago.

Oh, gees.

Oh, yeah.

Are you all right?

I had to go to the ER and take antibiotics for 10

days.

10

11

Okay.

The next item I have is just miscellaneous

clothes, $100?

12

Yeah, they are always ruining my clothes.

13

Ruining them or stealing them?

14

Both.

15

When you say ruining them, what do you mean by

16

that?

17

They'll put spots on them so I can't wear them,

18

the shirts, or they'll shrink them.

19

slippers they make big.

20

kinds of tricks.

They've done that.

So I can't wear those.

My

I mean all

21

I'm sorry?

22

Slippers big.

23

They made them big.

24

If you -- I have those three experts I mentioned.

25

They made -So I can't wear them.

They all talk about -- the first thing they do in these

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page95
68
69
86
15of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

16

programs is break into your house, and it's impossible,

impossible to find out how they get in.

were here.

Forced entry?

Yes, a broken window --

No ---

-- a broken door.

-- in '87, I did.

10

And I think we talked about this last time you


You don't have any signs of forced entry?

Well, I had forced entry by the

Lancaster City Police last July on a 302 warrant.

11

Yeah, you told me about that.

12

But other than that, forced entry, no, no.

13
14
15
16

Signs

of entry, but not forced.


Q

When you say signs of entry, you define that by

the fact things were missing?


A

Moved, missing, lights on that were off or off

17

that were on, things like that.

18

porch -- you know, if I go out in the evening, I'll leave

19

my front porch light on.

20

and, you know, hard to get in, you know, to see your key

21

hole and things like that.

22
23
24
25

The other night my

Well, I came home and it's off

It's harassment.

The next item you have is vapor electronic

cigarettes?
A

Oh, yeah, now they help you reduce smoking regular

cigarettes.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page96
69
70
87
16of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

17

These are the E-Cigs?

Yeah, but they are the pens with cartridges.

are expensive.

like at Turkey Hill or something.

that -- they are three in one.

or dry herbs.

nicotine.

think, I think one after that.

They

They are not the ones you buy in the store


These are the ones

You can smoke waxes, oils

Now what I get is, like, six milligrams of

It's in liquid form.

They stole my fifth one I

All from home?

10

Oh, yeah, yeah, all from home, yeah, five of them.

11

I mean that sounds like the kind of thing -- I

12
13
14
15
16
17

mean I'm famous for leaving things behind at restaurants.


A

Oh, no, no, no, no, no, I don't leave this behind.

No, no, they were stolen.


Q

Same thing, you don't know when they got in, how

they got in, but they are just not there anymore?
A

Well, I mean in 2009 -- let me give you an

18

example.

19

document daily in journals all the incidents that I'm

20

describing.

21

every day.

In 2010, I said I have enough documentation.

22

That's it.

I mean it's a full-time job.

23

those.

Okay.

This is what I used to do.

I used to

I did that for about a year, very detailed,

I can send you

I mean I have those in PDF form.

24

Yeah.

25

I can send you those.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

I mean I can email those to

Page
Page97
70
71
88
17of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

18

you.

the Court?

This whole thing is the emergency injunction.

All right.

It looks like this is something that's filed with

Well, I mean that should be available

online.

I'd say three days.

This is filed with the prothonotary --

Yes.

10

-- in Civil Court?

11

Yeah, I can show you the stamped pages.

I just

12

had to make copies.

13

I'm waiting for a cartridge to be delivered today.

14

you page to the left, you'll see the three pages that were

15

stamped.

My toner mysteriously went out, and


But if

16

That's not what I was supposed to get there.

17

There you go.

18

down.

19

20
21

If you swipe it -- no, it's up and

There is four pages stamped there.


Yeah, it just has the time stamp on it.

It

doesn't have the docket number.


A

No, yeah, they didn't -- I guess I could have

22

maybe got them to give me a docket number, but they didn't.

23

You know, I didn't push it.

24

All right.

25

Here you can see the -- there's the state cover

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page98
71
72
89
18of
of365
318
319
356
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

19

1
2
3

sheet.
Q

Yeah, they didn't stamp it with a docket number

either.

This is the civil cover sheet.

Okay.

And this is the first page of the injunction.

Judge Margaret Miller ruled on mine in '09 and

essentially -- it was similar to this.

what she said was that I didn't provide her enough evidence

10

for her to rule in my favor.

11

she said.

12

victim of mind control.

13

because I got corroborating witnesses.

But this time it's a lot different

Okay.

15

Dr. Nick Begich.

Who are the corroborating witnesses?


He's an expert in mind control

technologies.

17

Where is he out of?

18

Alaska.

19

In a nutshell, that's what

Plus she said she didn't really believe I was a

14

16

And essentially

Administration.

His father was killed by the Hoover


He was a U.S. congressman.

20

What was the last name again?

21

Begich, B-e-g-i-c-h.

I'm sorry.

Now his brother just

22

finished a term in Congress last year in the Senate.

23

Anyway, his father back in -- I forget what year it was --

24

was traveling with the Speaker of the House, Wayne Boggs,

25

and they were both killed in a plane accident.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page99
72
73
90
19of
of365
318
319
356
34

And they

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

20

were raising hell about Hoover with his CoIntel Program.

So anyway, Nick Begich began doing research on the HARP

Installation in Alaska, which is a 180 antenna array that

is the focus or the basis for electromagnetic weapons.

It's called HARP.

convinced the European Parliament to ban electromagnetic

weapons.

transcript of his lecture in October of 2015, and he gave a

lecture during the Covert Harassment Conference in Belgium.

10

Now back about eight years ago, he

So he's a renowned expert.

Now I have a

I think it was Belgium.

11

Okay.

12

Yes, then I have Karen Stewart.

13

You mentioned her.

14

Karen Stewart is a former NSA whistleblower.

15

National Security Agency when you say NSA?

16

Yeah, yeah.

Do you have other witnesses?

She blew the whistle in 2004.

Now

17

she just emailed me three weeks ago.

18

information, and she emailed me back and said thank you for

19

it.

20

determined that some weaponry that was being used over in

21

Afghanistan and Iraq wasn't performing up to standards.

22

And she more or less drew attention to it to the U.S.

23

Military, and somebody took credit for her work.

24

became an NSA whistleblower.

25

same problems I did, people breaking in her house,

I emailed some

Anyway, she -- essentially what happened was she

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And she

Then she started having the

Page
Page
Page100
73
74
91
20of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

21

electromagnetic weapon attacks, things like that.

Now the NSA is critical for two reasons.

I blew

the whistle on ISC, the Lancaster firm selling arms to

Iraq.

was with the NSA.

director of the NSA, was on their board of directors.

also owns a company that deals in mind control.

Bill Clinton nominated him to be the Secretary of Defense,

and he withdrew because of the ISC scandal.

Their first program -- their first contract in 1973


Bobby Ray Inman, who was the former
He

In 1994,

Plus on March

10

9th, the NSA took me into custody, false imprisoned me for

11

an hour and a half and had eight security police

12

interrogate me for no reason.

13

Of this year, March of this year?

14

Yeah, down in Fort Meade.

15

Where is Fort Meade?

16

That's the NSA.

17

Is Fort Meade in Colorado?

18

Maryland.

19

Oh, I'm sorry.

20

Dogs at my car, handcuffed me, interrogated me and

21

then told me I couldn't go down to Washington, D.C. and

22

told me I wasn't allowed on federal property anymore, which

23

was a lie.

24

of them.

25

I walked away and essentially made a fool out

Karen Stewart, where is she located?

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page101
74
75
92
21of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

22

Well, she worked down in Fort Meade, Maryland, but

she since -- after she blew the whistle and started having

symptoms, she moved to Florida -- I believe that's where

she's at now -- with family.

Okay.

I got a little sidetracked there.

Let me

bring you back to the next item, which is HVLP tips.

they related to the cigarettes?

8
9

A
sprayer.

Are

No, no, that's a high-volume,low-pressure paint


What they did was -- I bought a used one at the

10

Reuse It Store off of Pitney Road out near Greenfield

11

Industrial Park.

12

come with it, so different velocities for the paint, like

13

smaller and larger.

14

instruction manual and brushes to clean it.

15

everything in a clear plastic bag to keep it all together.

16

I went to use the sprayer, and the bag was gone.

17

to go out and buy a brand-new HVLP.

18

one I bought -- I think I paid 60 for it.

19
20
21

Okay.

And I brought it home, and I put -- tips

It comes with three tips.

Tips.

So I put

So I had

It cost me $119.

The

You have a quantity lost two and then

estimated cost to replace 45.


A

It had an

What did you lose two of?

Yeah, what they did was they put the small

22

tip in.

23

you know, you need the larger tip.

24

thought I could replace the tips, but you can't.

25

to replace the whole thing.

So I'm trying to spray stain for my fence, and,

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page102
75
76
93
22of
of356
318
319
365
34

But I said 45.

I
So I had

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

23

1
2

Okay.

I don't mean to be redundant.

So I'm just

going to ask you --

That's all right.

-- a blanket question here if it applies to all of

these items here, and I'll show it to you.

items, you don't have -- or you're not willing to produce a

receipt.

8
9

For all these

Correct?
Only if you give me a guarantee that you're going

to pay the claim.

10

And I've told you I can't do that.

11

Okay.

12

None of these items have been reported as lost or

13

stolen or damaged to the police.

Correct?

14

To the police?

15

Yes.

16

I'm in this injunction accusing the police of

17

trying to kill me.

No, I mean I can't.

18

All right.

19

That's what abuse of process is.

20
21

And none of these items -It's when the

police do not take your complaints.


Q

And for any of these items, you do not have -- you

22

can't tell me specifically who it was who stole it or broke

23

it or whatever the case may be?

24

No.

25

All right.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

I'm not going to keep asking that

Page
Page
Page103
76
77
94
23of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

24

question.

I can -- I can tell you this.

Since 2006, the

neighbors at 1252 Fremont Street have been engaged in a

constant harassment and threat campaign no matter who is in

that house.

Has there been a change in --

Oh, yeah, three times.

Is it a rental house?

Yes.

10

Do you know who the current residents are?

11

No, they don't tell me the truth, no.

I mean I

12

filed a private criminal complaint against them in the

13

County D.A.'s Office this year.

14

harass me.

15

happened June 10th.

16

Center on College Avenue.

17

and 10 Vicodin.

18

shots, but I didn't do it.

19

have the hospital report.

They are Spanish.

They are the ones who sic the dog on me.

That

I went to Lancaster Regional Medical


Dr. Westphal gave me antibiotics

Now he wanted me to go through rabies


I said the dog wasn't rabid.

20

The next item is a staple airgun?

21

Right.

22

That was theft.

23

They

They stole my staple airgun.


That wasn't damaged.

That was

theft?

24

Yeah, theft.

25

When was that?

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

That was theft.

Page
Page
Page104
77
78
95
24of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

25

This all -- this all happened when I started

erecting the new six foot fence and a screened-in porch in

my back.

And I started construction March 10th.

So sometime after March 10th?

Yeah.

And I don't know if I asked you about the HVLP

tips.

I'm going to say in May.

Of this year?

10

Yeah.

11

I also don't think I asked you about the five

12
13

But when were those taken?

vapor electronic cigarette cartridges.


A

Okay.

I bought my first one -- let me see.

14

say that was all after January 1st.

15

after January 1st.

16

I bought one at the convenience store on Manor or

17

Millersville Pike, Hershey Avenue.

18
19
20
21
22

I'd

Yeah, they were all

I bought one downtown at Puff N' Stuff.

In doing the math here, it looks like they go for

about 50 to $60 a piece?


A

Yeah, some are -- that's the minimum.

last one I bought was $79.


Q

Okay.

I think the

That's the minimum price.

The next one is a belt for $9.

Are we

23

talking about, you know, a belt to hold your pants up, that

24

kind of belt?

25

Yeah, yeah.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page105
78
79
96
25of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

26

Stolen, damaged?

Stolen.

When?

Within the past two months.

The next one is a 36 inch by 100 feet --

Oh, yeah.

-- black screen?

That was to do my screened-in porch.

replace it.

10

Stolen?

11

Stolen.

12
13
14

In fact, I just bought that -- I replaced

that probably a month ago.


Q

I'm sorry?

You just replaced the screen for the

screened-in porch?

15

Yeah, it's a roll.

16

Right.

17

roll.

18

19
20
21

It's 100 by --

I'm familiar with them.

So it was on the

Somebody just took the roll?


Yeah, it was in a plastic bag, yeah, plastic

sleeve, yeah, took the whole roll.


Q

Okay.

And the last one is one pair of work

gloves?

22

Yeah.

23

I know what work gloves are.

24

Yeah.

25

I had to

Now here's what they do.

A lot of times

they'll steal it and then a week later they'll return it.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page106
79
80
97
26of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

27

I mean they play games like that.

warfare along with the theft and damages.

It's psychological

Were any of these items ever returned to you?

Some.

I mean I can't keep track.

list.

possession.

Some were.

Okay.

Then they'd steal them again.


It's hard to keep track of it.

As of today, are -- here, I'll show you the

Tell me if any of those items are in your

Let's see.

Well, some of these are damaged.

10

wished they returned the vapor electronic cigarettes.

11

the work gloves they did return.

12

them.

13

14
15
16
17
18

I
Now

I found where they put

So they are in your possession at least as of

today?
A

Yes, they are.

I don't know if they'll stay

there.
Q

Now is there anything that you would like to add

to supplement to this list?

19

As far as the list or evidence or what?

20

No, as far as the list of items.

21

Yeah, I could -- you know, I can update, yeah.

22
23

can send them to you.


Q

Of anything that you would add to that list, would

24

they all have been items in which were lost or damaged --

25

stolen or damaged in the same way as the items that we've

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page107
80
81
98
27of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

28

discussed?

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

I got tired of making --

keeping lists.

think.

Okay.

morning -- I produced an exhibit, a DVD, a disk with this

case to the Courts.

myself.

That happened this morning.

But I -- well, let me do it now.

Let me see.

Let me

We talked about the new vapor pen.

Here is a for instance.

I went to -- this

So I have to make a copy today for

The DVD recorder doesn't work on my computer.


Yesterday -- oh, this morning

10

I found that two day's worth of photos in my phone were

11

missing from my computer.

12

and on.

13

anything substantial because I probably -- well, the toner

14

cartridge.

15

toner gets low, it will give you a warning that you need to

16

soon replace your toner.

17

document.

18

out, but it never gave me the warning.

19

capability of actually hacking into my copier because it's

20

a wireless copier.

21
22

Q
off.

I mean there is nothing -- I'm trying to think of

What happens is I have a copier.

And when the

Well, I'm producing this

And at the 611th page, it says black ink toner


So they have the

So I had to order a new ink cartridge.

Now you did mention -- and I don't mean to cut you


Is there anything else that you want to talk about?

23

No.

24

All right.

25

Yeah, you know, the list goes on

Now you did mention that you had

submitted two similar claims to other insurers?

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page108
81
82
99
28of
of356
318
319
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

29

Yeah, yeah.

Tell me about those.

They were in '05 I was paid and '06.

I -- okay.

Conestoga, PA.

about the same, somewhere around $6,000.

schedule similar to this, and they paid from that schedule.

Now what they did was the one they paid the claim, but they

inflated the depreciation value.

It's when

It's when I lived at 220 Stonehill Road,


The claims were about -- I think they were
I produced a

So I filed a complaint

10

with the Pennsylvania Insurance Commission.

11

no, 2007 or 8, after I moved to 1250 Fremont Street, I

12

tried to file a claim.

13

filing that on my mother's property casualty policy.

14

would have filed another claim.

15

Now in 2006 --

But my brother blocked me from


So I

Now the insurance companies, they have a database

16

of all the insurance claims that are paid out.

17

familiar with that?

Are you

18

No.

19

Yeah, there's a database that actuaries use.

20

don't know how you access it or what.

21

have a correspondence from the Southern Regional Police

22

Department in 2006 -- 5 or 6 regarding all my complaints to

23

them about incidents regarding vandalism and thefts.

24

Southern Regional Police covered Conestoga Township back

25

then.

The other thing is I

Now

Now I went to try to find -- I know I had paperwork

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page109
100
82
83
29of
of319
318
356
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

30

on the claims.

claims, but I can't find them in my computer.

I had copies of the checks, copies of the

Do you remember who the insurers were?

Harleysville was for one, maybe both of them, you

know.

Theft or damaged or --

Just like this, yeah.

And they were the same type of claims.

I tried to find them.

have backup disks now.

three laptop drives and two external hard drives from 2005

Unfortunately, there is -- I have

10

and 6 that are in my safety deposit box.

11

equipment so that I could more or less connect those drives

12

to my computer and read them, but the equipment would come

13

and it won't work.

14

until I'm more secure with the computer hacking, I can't do

15

anything with them.

16

even though they took them from my current drive.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Q
you.

Okay.

I ordered

So I have them stored.

But, you know,

But I'm sure the claims are in there

I don't think I have any more questions for

Is there anything that you'd like to add to this?


A

No.

If you could tell me what you want other than

the receipts.
Q

There was a letter sent to you I believe sometime

between the first examination and the second examination.


A

24

morning.

25

that.

I couldn't find it.

I tried to find it this

That's why I asked you what time.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page110
101
83
84
30of
of319
318
356
365
34

They stole

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

31

I don't think I have --

I think I have a hard copy, but I didn't want to

root through my file.

and I couldn't find it.

letter format because I scan everything?

6
7

I tried to find it on my computer


Did you email it or did it come in

I believe I was emailed a copy of it, but I

think -- I assume it was sent to you in letter format.

Are you talking about the one form Allstate --

Yes.

10

-- or the one from you?

11

No, no, the one from Allstate.

12

I have that.

13

That's what I'm talking about.

14

Yeah, I have that.

15

that.

16

They want a document filled out and --

17

Right.

18

-- forwarded back to them.

19

Was I supposed to bring that today?

20

It would have been helpful, but it's not

21

mandatory.

22

don't have to send it to me.

That's right.

Yeah, I have

If you could get it back to Mr. Eisenhard.

You

23

Okay.

24

Other than that, you know, I don't know that there

25

was -- whatever Allstate had requested.

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page111
102
84
85
31of
of319
318
356
365
34

The only thing I

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

32

1
2

was looking for were the receipts.


A

3
4

Okay.
MR. REESER:

Okay.

And we're done.

Thank you

very much.

THE WITNESS:

(Whereupon, the examination concluded at 10:12

Yeah.

a.m.)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page112
103
85
86
32of
of319
318
356
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

33

COUNTY OF DAUPHIN

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

SS
3

I, Diane A. Smith, a Notary Public, authorized to

administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the

testimony of Stanley J. Caterbone.

I further certify that before the taking of said

examination, the witness was duly sworn; that the questions

and answers were taken down stenographically by the said

10

Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to

11

typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter.

12

I further certify that the said examination was

13

taken at the time and place specified in the caption sheet

14

hereof.

15

I further certify that I am not a relative or

16

employee or attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or a

17

relative or employee of such attorney or counsel, or

18

financially interested directly or indirectly in this

19

action.

20

I further certify that the said examination

21

constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the

22

said witness.

23

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand

24

this 11th day of July, 2016.


_______________________________________________
Diane A. Smith, Reporter
Notary Public

25

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page113
104
86
87
33of
of319
318
356
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony

34

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Allstate
Stan
J. Caterbone
Sworn Testimony
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page114
105
87
88
34of
of319
318
356
365
34

Monday August
June 28,
22, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF


STANLEY J. CATERBONE

TAKEN BY:

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

BEFORE:

DIANE F. FOLTZ, RMR


NOTARY PUBLIC

DATE:

JUNE 9, 2016, 9:15 A.M.

PLACE:

LANCASTER COUNTY BAR


ASSOCIATION
28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
106
115
88
89
1 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

2
1

WITNESSES

NAME

STANLEY J. CATERBONE

BY: MR. REESER

EXAMINATION

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

EXHIBITS

13
14

CATERBONE EXHIBIT

15

1.

PRODUCED AND MARKED

LIST OF ITEMS

13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
107
116
89
90
2 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

3
1
2

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, called as a witness, being


duly sworn, testified as follows:

3
4

EXAMINATION
BY MR. REESER:

Could you state your name, please?

Stanley J. Caterbone, C-a-t-e-r-b-o-n-e.

Would you mind if I called you Stan or Stanley?

Stan.

Stan, okay.

10

And my name's Chris Reeser.

You can

call me Chris.

11

All right.

12

I'm not a real formal guy.

I have been asked to

13

take a statement from you relative to an insurance claim

14

which I understood to have occurred as a result of

15

something on April 3rd of 2016, but by some correspondence

16

that I received from you, my understanding is that is not

17

the date of loss.

18
19

No.

That date is the date that I started the

spreadsheet --

20

Okay.

21

-- of the items lost or vandalized.

22

All right.

This statement is part of the process

23

of collecting information and evaluating the claim.

24

Allstate's policy, as does just about any insurance

25

company's policy, provides that part of the duty of an

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
108
117
90
91
3 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

4
1

insured is to give an examination under oath --

Okay.

-- at the request of the insured -- at the

request of the insurer, so that is what this is.

I've had --

Go ahead.

I've had -- I've collected on two or three

Go ahead.

policies with the same types of claims, and I've never been

put under oath --

10

Okay.

11

-- on the record.

12

So noted.

13

Okay.

14

And I'll ask you about that.

15

And I don't mind under oath.

16

All right.

17

I just, you know --

18

All right.

19

-- have never experienced it.

20

Okay.

22

Sure.

23

This is part of what the insurer is allowed to

21

24
25

Well --

Well, a first time for everything.

This

is --

ask of their insured.


A

Oh, I don't mind at all.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
109
118
91
92
4 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

5
1
2

Okay.

Great.

So I'm going to ask you some

questions about that.

Okay.

I usually when I take these statements -- and

I've taken a couple of them -- have some information about

the claim.

claim.

Okay.

So --

10

Can I give you a brief history --

11

Go.

12

-- to put it in perspective?

13

Yeah.

14

I am a federal whistleblower.

I have very little information about this

Go.
I blew the whistle

15

on International Signal Control or ISC in 1987.

They were

16

indicted in 1991 for a billion dollar fraud and selling

17

illegal arms to Iraq.

18

1987 they --

19

I'm sorry.

20

Yes.

21

operations.

22

Okay.

23

Now, since -- I've been trying to get into

Now, I was a shareholder, and in

You were a shareholder in ISC?

They solicited me to finance some

So I'm a legitimate, bona fide whistleblower.

24

courts, hired various attorneys from '87 all the way up.

25

In 2005 I entered the federal court system as a pro se

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
110
119
92
93
5 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

6
1

litigant.

I filed my own claims.

Okay.

Okay.

Now, here's what happened.

I became a

victim of organized stalking, electronic harassment or mind

control technologies.

show you some expert testimony -- is that what they do is

they break into your home, vandalize, steal, move things

around.

policies making the same types of claims.

Now, what happens is -- and I'll

And since '05 I've collected on two or three

10

losses are not a single-day loss.

11

period of time.

Now, these

They happen over a

12

Okay.

13

And I can't give you dates as far as when what

14

was taken, when that was taken, but that's just a

15

background for your reference as far as this is not an

16

ordinary claim.

17

When you say they, who is they?

18

Well, I don't know, you know.

19

say.

20

be agents.

21

It could be neighbors.

It's impossible to

It could be police.

It could be anybody.
But you believe that they are all in conspiracy

22

to punish you because of your activity as a federal

23

whistleblower?

24
25

A
that.

It could

I'm going to refer you to documents to explain


As a victim of electronic harassment and gang

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
111
120
93
94
6 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

7
1

stalking, the victim -- part of the victimization is that

they break into your home.

Okay.

But you don't know who the they is?

Well, of course not.

Have you ever seen anybody in the act?

I have one person on a security camera video.

Okay.

That was in 2006.

And was there an insurance claim related to that?

10

Not to that particular person, no.

11

All right.

12

But there was a claim that year.

Harleysville

13

paid me once or twice, and there was another one.

But

14

unfortunately I'm also the victim of computer hacking.

15

These are all the reports from the past year on Geek Squad

16

and other companies reviewing and analyzing and fixing my

17

hard drives after they've been hacked.

18

Okay.

19

I filed about, oh, boy, since '06 or '07 probably

20

about four or five IC3 reports with the FBI.

21

I don't know what an IC3 report is.

22

It's an online complaint regarding anything

23

fraudulent online to the FBI.

24

Okay.

25

I've had face-to-face meetings with the FBI

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
112
121
94
95
7 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

8
1

probably about 15 times.

Locally?

Philly and Harrisburg.

Is there a particular agent that you meet with?

No.

Could you tell me the names of any of the agents

No.

that you meet with?

No.

Okay.

10

I can verify the meetings, I mean.

11

What -- what's the reason for the meetings?

12

Complaints --

13

Okay.

14

-- about people, what they're doing to me.

15

You said you're a victim of electronic

16

harassment.

17

Okay.

18

What have been the other forms?

19

They use microwave technology, microwaves to

Now, I understand what computer hacking is.


Electronic harassment.

20

alter your brain state.

21

cause extreme pain in any part of your body.

22

create synthetic telepathy.

23

with the weapons.

24
25

It causes extreme -- they can


They can

They can essentially kill you

Now, in the 1950's the Russians used it against


our -- the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, the same weapons.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
113
122
95
96
8 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Now,

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

9
1

in the 1970's there was what's called the Church Committee.

The CIA had to come clean on these programs.

supposed to have stopped them, but they didn't, and that's

-- there's Senate testimony.

then was Stansfield Turner.

Senate, and they admitted to all the programs that I'm

describing.

Okay.

MKUltra was the main program.

10

How do you know that?

11

How do I know what?

12

I mean, how do you know you're a victim of

13

The Director of the CIA back


He testified before the

microwave technology to alter your brain waves?

14
15

They were

Some nights I can't walk.

The pain is that bad.

What do you mean how do I know?

16

I mean, I don't know.

17

Don't get smart with me, or I'll walk out this

I don't know.

18

door.

19
20

I'm not being smart.

I'm trying

to understand this.

21

Okay.

22

How do I -- you know, how do I know I'm not?

23

Do you ever complain about it?

24

I mean, I have pain.

25

pain.

I don't know why I have

I just -- I'm trying to understand.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page
114
123
96
97
9 of
of51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

10
1

Listen, yesterday I filed 300 pages in the

Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a case against Lancaster City

Police and the county residents.

Okay.

There are -- there is expert testimony in here

from, one, an NSA whistleblower named Karen Stewart who

will back up just about everything I say.

from a Julianne McKinney who is a former Army intelligence

officer.

The second is

The third is from a renowned expert named Nick

10

Begich whose father was killed by someone in the Hoover

11

Administration.

12

read them.

There are transcripts in here.

You can

13

Okay.

14

You can learn all about it.

15

May I have this?

16

No.

17

Okay.

18

Or I can give you it in electronic format.

19
20
21
22
23

You can make a copy.

have a PDF around my neck.


Q

I'll give you a copy.

Well, I see that it's a Petition for Allowance of

Appeal which means that it's -A

I'm appealing a Superior Court decision to the

Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

24

Okay.

25

I'm a very successful litigator by the way.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page124
115
97
98
10of
of319
318
51
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

11
1

How --

I'm the amicus for Kathleen Kane in her criminal

case in the Superior Court in Philadelphia.

movant for Lisa Michelle Lambert.

I'm also the

Okay.

I've got three Third Circuit cases now that are

7
8
9
10

awaiting decisions.
Q

And this is an appeal from the Lancaster County

Court of Common Pleas.

I assume it went then to the

Superior Court?

11

I took it to the Superior Court, right.

12

Okay.

13

They dismissed it --

14

Okay.

15

-- two weeks before oral arguments.

16

And what happened there?

Oral

arguments were scheduled for May 24th.

17

Okay.

18

They were scheduled since January.

Both cases

19

were arguably -- I mean, maliciously dismissed two weeks

20

before oral arguments.

21

before them.

22

23

Okay.

They didn't want me to appear

Give me some background.

you worked -- maybe I misheard you.

24

No.

25

Okay.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

I mean, you said

Did you work for ISC?

You were a stockholder?

Page
Page
Page125
116
98
99
11of
of319
318
51
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

12
1

Yes.

Okay.

He was a stockbroker back then.

he is?

Gib Armstrong sold me the stock in 1983.

Do you know who

Former Pennsylvania Senator.


Yeah, I'm familiar with the name.

Are you

employed right now?

No, I'm -- I collect Social Security disability

for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. mind control,

documented, verified.

10

Huh.

11

They've been paying me since '08.

12

Okay.

13

for that?

Do they -- do they pay you by the month

Is it --

14

You never heard of Social Security disability?

15

I have.

16

Yeah.

17

Okay.

18

My first check was for $21,000.

They paid me.

19

applied in '09.

20

'05 when I declared I was full-time telepathic, but they

21

could only pay me back one year.

22

to '09 in one check, and then I've been getting monthly

23

checks ever since.

24
25

Okay.

They declared me disabled in December of

So they paid me back '08

Well, let's talk about this claim a little

bit.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page
Page126
100
117
99
12of
of318
51
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

13
1

Okay.

I'm going to have this marked as Exhibit 1.

I have a new one here.

Okay.

Well, why don't you -- why don't we mark

-- can I take that, or do you need that?

Yeah.

No.

Okay.

We won't mark the one I have.

Here.

That's updated.

MR. REESER:

Do you want to put a sticker

(List of items produced and marked Exhibit No.

13

1.)

14

BY MR. REESER:

16

Okay.

on there?

12

15

Every day I have stuff

missing.

10
11

This is for you.

All right.

Now, I'm just going to go through

these items that you have --

17

Yeah.

18

-- listed in order from top to bottom.

19

You're

making a claim for a dishwasher?

20

Right.

21

Is this a dishwasher that was in your home?

22

Yeah, but you know -- I'm trying to think what

23

year that was actually broken.

24

Scratch the dishwasher off of that.

25

That might predate this.

The dishwasher is not being claimed, correct?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page127
100
101
118
13 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

14
1

Yes.

Yes, let's take that off.

All right.

And I should ask you this beforehand.

I kind of lost track.

Your brief or your petition that was

filed to the Supreme Court listed an address of 1250

Freemont Street.

That's -- that's your home address?

Yes.

Okay.

No.

All right.

10

In fact, I sent a copy of the deed in with the

11

claim.

12

13

Does anybody else live there with you?

I believe I saw that, which I think there were a

number of grantees.

14

My brothers.

15

Okay.

16

No.

17

And they wouldn't be insured under the Allstate

18

But none of them live there?

policy?

19

Yeah, they're listed as other insureds.

20

Okay.

21

Yeah.

22

Okay.

23

Do any of these items -- are they owners

of any of the items?

24

No.

I purchased the policy for everybody.

25

Okay.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Front and back door locks?

Page
Page128
101
102
119
14 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

15
1

Right.

Tell me about that.

Okay.

In July of 2015 -- yeah, July, 2015, the

benevolent Lancaster City Police Department served me with

a 302 petition, but what they did was they broke into my

house, smashed in the front door.

to pay for all the locks and the door, but they didn't.

8
9
10

Now, they were supposed

So I had to get a new front door, and I had to


get all the locks changed in the front and back door,
rekeyed.

11

Okay.

12

Mental health warrant.

13

All right.

14

I've had about eight of them.

15

do.

302 petition?

That's what they

That's part of the slander campaign.

16

What do they --

17

That's pretty routine.

18

What do they claim?

19

Well, I'm mentally ill.

20

Okay.

21

That's their -- that's their defense.

22

Is there a form of mental illness that they try

23

I make all this up.

to pin on you?

24

Oh, yeah.

25

What?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page129
102
103
120
15 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

16
1

Which one do you want?

Oh, there's been more than one?

Bipolar, schizophrenic, delusional disorder, you

4
5
6

What year?

name it.
Q

Okay.

Were you hospitalized or

institutionalized --

Oh, yeah.

-- as a result -- as a result of this one, the

one in July?

10

Oh, yeah, Fairmont.

11

For how long?

12

Oh, that was about five -- eight days, I guess.

13

And how did that end?

14

They always -- they give me a hearing.

15

Then they

have to release me.

16

Okay.

17

They're always pretty much the same.

It started

18

in '87.

19

Harbor Beach Patrol.

20

was making a movie with Tony Bongiovi who owns Power

21

Station Studios, one of the world's most famous recording

22

studios.

23

The first one was was somebody called up the Stone


My resume's in there.

In 1987 we're making a movie.

24

for an office down in Stone Harbor.

25

the movie in New Jersey on the boardwalk.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page130
103
104
121
16 of 51
318
319
356
365

But in 1987 I

I rented a home

We were going to shoot


Somebody called

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

17
1

the Stone Harbor Police Department and said I was running

to the beach to kill myself, totally made up, fabricated.

That's how it all started with the mental illness.

Okay.

Okay.

Smashed in your front door?

Oh, yeah, with -- like a drug raid.

So going back to the door for a second --

I stood

there and took pictures of them as they came through.

Do you actually have the pictures?

10

Oh, yeah, it's part of it.

11

Part of?

12

The -- they're in here.

Oh, let me see.

No, they're in this one.

This one.

No.

Where

13

are they?

These

14

are black and white.

15

pages.

16

only reason you could do that is if someone -- is if you

17

knew that someone was in there with a gun to their head.

18

was in -- I was in the upstairs window talking to them

19

trying to get them to get away from me quite honestly.

They're hard to see, but the next two

Totally illegal what they did.

The only way, the

20

Okay.

21

I filed a lawsuit against Lancaster City Police

22

in '08.

It's a federal lawsuit.

23

one of the documents I have here.

In fact, that's part of

24

Is that still ongoing?

25

I withdrew without prejudice because of the

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page131
104
105
122
17 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

18
1

computer hacking, so I can re-file, go back to it any time

I want.

Okay.

Most of my lawsuits I withdrew without prejudice.

5
6

I just couldn't litigate with all the hacking.


Q

Can -- do you have any photographs that show the

damage to the door?

I mean, I see a door that's open.

see a police officer --

Yeah.

10

-- apparently standing there.

11

Yeah.

12

Okay.

13

In fact, I bought the door at the Habitat reuse

Yeah, I do.

14

it store.

But what happened was they charged me like $400

15

to change all the locks.

Wizard Lock did it.

16

Do you have -- do you have the receipt for that?

17

Yeah, I could dig that up.

18

You don't have it with you right now?

19

No.

20

You bought the door -- I'm sorry -- Habitat?

21

For Humanity.

22

Habitat?

23

Habitat for Humanity.

24

Oh, Habitat for Humanity.

25

The reuse it store.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

I'm a little hard of hearing.

Page
Page132
105
106
123
18 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

19
1

Reuse it.

Out on Old Philadelphia Pike back behind

Greenfield.

door than was on there.

The door looks brand new, I mean, a better

The door, the replacement door you bought there?

Yeah.

What about the original door, was that -- had

8
9

that been there for years?


A

No, that was done in 1996.

My mother was part of

10

the Lancaster City Homeowners Rehab or Revitalization or

11

Rehab Program where if you qualify, they'll come in and

12

rehab your home, bring it up to code and put a seven-year

13

lien on your house for the cost of the improvements.

14

year 10 -- 10 or 15 percent comes off, so if you stay in

15

the house for 7 years, it's all free.

16

I see.

17

So the doors are part of that.

18

Okay.

19

'96 at the time.

20

And you may have said this.

21

didn't get it.

22

that -- the replacement door?

23

$20.

24

$20?

25

Yes.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Each

I apologize if I

How much did you actually pay for the door

Page
Page133
106
107
124
19 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

20
1

But it cost you 400 to get the locks replaced?

Yeah.

And that was done again by?

Wizard.

Wizard.

Locks.

And you can get me the receipt?

Yeah.

And my question about that was going to be did

Yeah.

10

you report this to the police, but I guess given the

11

circumstances --

12

Here's the situation.

I've -- I've been

13

reporting to the police ever since it started, but usually

14

they're part of the program.

15

complaints.

16

to sue them.

17

Okay.

18

I have letters which are a part of the documents

They won't take my

I mean, I had to sue them.

That's why I had

19

going to the police explaining the vandalism and the

20

break-ins that they won't, you know, report on or

21

investigate or...

22

And this happened July of '15?

23

July 8th, I think, yeah, 2015.

24

July 8th, 2015, okay.

25

Was there any other damage

done, physical damage to your house done --

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page134
107
108
125
20 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

21
1

No.

-- as a result of that incident?

Just the door.

Okay.

5
6

The next one I have on your list is an

Apple Video iPod.


A

Right.

What they did was I can't -- the menu

button doesn't work.

'05 or '06.

Okay.

10

I since bought a replacement for it.

11

All right.

12

Now, that iPod I bought back in 2006,

You bought -- this particular Apple

Video iPod you bought in '05 or '06?

13

Yeah.

14

Where did you buy it at?

15

I might have bought it at a Best Buy in Florida.

16

Okay.

17

Boy, 3, $400 probably.

18

Okay.

19

It's when they first came out, so the video iPods

20

Do you remember what you paid for it?

And then when did you --

were expensive.

21

Yeah.

22

No.

23

-- just an iPod?

24

Right, video iPod.

25

And then you noticed a problem with it when?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

This wasn't an iPhone.

Page
Page135
108
109
126
21 of 51
318
319
356
365

This was --

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

22
1
2

The button, you can't push the button, the main

button.

Okay.

Oh, boy.

fall of '15.

Okay.

No.

-- Best Buy or a repair store?

No, you can't.

10

Why not?

11

Why?

12

I mean, if I had a problem with my iPhone and

14

I'm not going to pay to get it fixed.

15

Okay.

16

I bought a replacement.

17

Okay.

13

18
19
20
21
22
23

When did you discover that?


Let me think.

That was probably in the

Did you take it to --

No.

No.

I --

Why is that -- I'm not -- I don't

understand why that's part of the insurance claim.


A

Because it was in my house and the house is

covered by the insurance.


Q

I mean, how do you know it just didn't -- I mean,

things wear down over time.


A

I mean --

I'm telling you the truth.

If you don't believe

24

me, that's fine, but don't -- don't harass me with

25

questions.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page136
109
110
127
22 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

23
1
2

I'm here to ask you questions, sir.

trying to get an understanding as to -- things wear out.

I told you what happened.

Okay.

They broke it.

They broke it?

Yes, someone broke it.

All right.

It's funny.

10

One day the button works, and the

next day it doesn't.

11

Okay.

12

Right.

13

How old --

14

I've had probably three stolen.

15

Oh, it was stolen?

16

Oh, yeah.

17

Okay.

18

I don't remember.

19
20
21

I'm just

or four stolen.
Q

Okay.

Bluetooth headset for phone.

When?
In the past year.

I had three

I had to buy replacements.


Well, you list $60, and that sounds about

what the value of a new Bluetooth would be.

22

Oh, no.

23

Oh, okay.

24

Does it say three beside there?

25

No, it doesn't.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

No.

That's for three of them, I think.

Well, no.

Page
Page137
110
111
128
23 of 51
318
319
356
365

It says item number,

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

24
1

but they're consecutive.

not a quantity.

I'm assuming that's not -- that's

Oh, didn't the quantity print out?

that.

Oh, the quantity didn't print out.

be three.

No.

Let me see
That should

All right.

I paid like 20 bucks apiece for them up at Radio

Shack.

Do you have the receipts for them?

10

I'm not going to dig up all these receipts.

11

really not.

12

is harassment.

13
14

Maybe I didn't put the quantity in.

I'm a busy guy.

I'm

I can't be -- you know, this

Does that mean you don't have them, or you're

just not going to -- you're not going to dig them up?

15

I'm not going to take the time to dig them up.

16

Okay.

17

I have all my receipts.

18

back to '80, '82.

19

Okay.

20

I document everything.

21

I have my tax returns

I'm an expert in

information technologies.

22

Where in your house --

23

I have worked all over the world for the record.

24

I did defense contracts, optical publishing.

25

of -- I was one of four companies in the late '80's, early

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page138
111
112
129
24 of 51
318
319
356
365

I was one

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

25
1

'90's that could manufacture CD-ROMs, me alone.

business.

were stolen?

Where did I have them?

Yeah.

It depends where I was.

Where were they stolen from?

Most likely either the bedroom which is in the

10

Okay.

I know my

basement.

Where in your house were the headsets that

In the bedroom, living room?

Yeah, the bedroom.

What do you mean?

Yeah.

11

Was there any sign of unlawful entry?

12

No, never is.

13

about that.

14

15

You'll read, the experts tell you

And I assume there was no report to the police

about these --

16

I can't report to the police anymore.

17

Okay.

Is it fair to say that with regard to any

18

of these items you haven't -- so I don't have to keep

19

asking you this, that you didn't report it to the police?

20
21

They get emails from me, but, no, there's no

official report.

22

All right.

23

The last official report I made was two thousand

24

-- was July 8th of 2015.

25

to report the computer hacking, and that night at 11:30

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

I went down to the police again

Page
Page139
112
113
130
25 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

26
1

they signed the mental health warrant on me --

Okay.

-- and gave me a bogus incident report.

All right.

The Bluetooth headsets, the three of

them were taken after that?

After what?

After the 302 petition.

Let me think.

Okay.

10
11
12

Yeah.

Yeah.

You don't have any idea who it was who

took them?
A

If I did I'd give you a name and report that to

everybody.

13

Okay.

14

Yes.

The hammer drill.


They broke it.

I'd say March 9th I started

15

my -- I'd say in March, 2016.

I'm putting on a new

16

screened-in porch on my back and a six-foot fence.

17

it worked.

18

buy a replacement.

The next day it didn't.

One day

So I had to go out and

19

How old was it?

20

I bought that one -- that's about the second or

21

third one they broke.

That one I bought on eBay in

22

probably -- when did I buy that one?

23

Do you still have it?

24

No.

25

Did you throw it out?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page140
113
114
131
26 of 51
318
319
356
365

Maybe '08.

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

27
1

Yeah.

All right.

You didn't take it someplace to see

if it could be fixed?

No.

What did you buy it for, how much?

How much?

How much.

Oh, boy.

9
10

That was a DeWalt.

I don't know -- $300 I think, 280.

New they're like --

I probably paid -- I

think I paid 60 something for that, somewhere around $60 --

11

Okay.

12

-- on eBay.

13

And then did you buy a replacement for it?

14

Yeah.

15

What did that cost?

16

The replacement I bought at -- oh, the tool store

17

out there next to the off-track betting.

18

of it?

19

Harbor Freight?

20

Harbor Freight.

21

drill.

22

Okay.

24

What is it?

25

Maybe 100?

23

What's the name

Harbor Tools.

I paid I think 60 for the hammer

But you have -- you have 100 listed here,

so --

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Maybe it was 100.

Page
Page141
114
115
132
27 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

28
1

Maybe.

Okay.

Reciprocating saw.

Yeah.

What they did was they rigged it so that

the blade doesn't stay in.

You can't use it.

It just --

When you turn it on it comes out?

Well, when you use it, it comes out when you're

sawing.

Okay.

You can't -- you can't tighten it.

10

work, but it stopped.

11

I bought that at Lowe's.

12
13

It used to

That replacement I bought -- I think

The one, the one that's broken or the one, the

replacement one?

14

The replacement.

15

Where did you buy the one that's broken?

16

Harbor Tools.

17

Harbor Freight?

18

Harbor Freight.

19

Okay.

20

23
24
25

When did

you buy that?

21
22

Just so we're on the same page.

A
'06.

'05.
Q

Oh, boy.

Let's see.

I might have bought that in

'05, '06.
Okay.

Did you use that on a regular basis or

just once in a while?


A

What do you mean on a regular basis?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page142
115
116
133
28 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

29
1

Did you use it once a week?

No.

Okay.

No.

No.

No.

No.

Did you use it --

No.

Reciprocating saws I probably used less

than any other tool actually.

I mean, a couple times?

But if I have a project I might use it a lot in a

8
9
10
11
12

two-week span.
Q

Yeah.

I mean, some people are do-it-yourself,

fixer-upper kind of people, and some people -A

Well, I used to have a contracting business in

college.

13

All right.

14

Stan Caterbone Painting and Renovating.

15

But you bought this in '05, '06?

16

assuming --

17

Right.

18

-- you were out of college by then.

19

I'm just saying I have experience.

20
21
22

I mean, I'm

I'm not just

a do-it-yourselfer.
Q

Well, no.

My -- some people do a lot of work

with their tools, and other people --

23

Oh, I do.

24

-- don't.

25

I do.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page143
116
117
134
29 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

30
1
2

Okay.

And that's what I'm getting at.

I'm

trying to understand.

I do.

I don't.

Okay.

So I could have something for ten years, and it

doesn't get any use at all.

No.

I understand.

And some people have it --

10

I use my tools.

11

-- for ten years, and they use it every day.

12

I use my stuff.

13

Fair enough.

And you got a replacement at

14

Lowe's, and you have $100 here.

15

paid for the replacement?

Is that about what you

16

Uh-huh.

17

Do you have the receipt?

18

Yeah.

19

Okay.

20

Is it fair to say you're not going to dig

that up?

21

No.

22

Okay.

23

I didn't have to for the other claims.

24
25

No.

I'm not going to do that.

I'm not

going to do it for your company.


Q

Okay.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

IPhone 5C, was that stolen?

Page
Page144
117
118
135
30 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

31
1

Broken.

When?

In fact, I got scammed on that, the 5C, the end

of last year.

Here's what happened.

They broke it, right,

so I put it on eBay to sell it so someone could reprogram

it, the software.

broken on it because it functioned, everything, but the

software was not functioning.

I assumed the software was what was

Okay.

So I put it on eBay.

Right.

Somebody bought it.

10

They hacked my PayPal account.

So someone said that they

11

paid me with electronic funds.

Well, PayPal doesn't use

12

electronic funds.

13

the money.

PayPal you use your account to transfer

Right.

14

Like a Visa account?

15

What's that?

16

Or a PayPal account.

17

PayPal account.

18

Okay.

19

So what they did was they filed a claim saying

Oh, a PayPal account.

20

that I never sent them the iPhone.

I wasn't going to send

21

it until I got -- until I verified the money was in my

22

account.

23

Uh-huh.

24

But because my PayPal account was hacked, I

25

couldn't access my PayPal account.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page145
118
119
136
31 of 51
318
319
356
365

Right.

Now, in my

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

32
1

PayPal account I had a cash balance of like $400.

went and awarded them judgment.

judgment.

So eBay

In eBay terms I'm saying

Uh-huh.

So they took the $150 or whatever selling price

out of my account, so I'm out the phone, plus the $150.

Okay.

So they scammed me.

All my accounts are hacked.

I file -- in all the courts I have electronic filing

10

privileges, Third Circuit, U.S. District Court, all the

11

state courts, the local courts.

12

which is the system where you file electronically --

Right.

My PACER account

13

I'm familiar with PACER.

14

-- I've been hacked since, oh, boy, November.

15

So

I got to run down to Philly every two weeks --

16

Okay.

17

-- to get my dockets, just to get dockets for all

18
19
20

my cases.
Q

Let me go back.

I'm -- you lost me on the phone

at some point.

21

Okay.

22

You had the phone.

23

phone?

24

Right, after it was unusable to me.

25

After it was unusable.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

You were looking to sell the

Page
Page146
119
120
137
32 of 51
318
319
356
365

Why was it unusable to

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

33
1

you?

Because there was a software problem?

It just didn't -- it wouldn't function for me.

Okay.

So I replaced it.

of Apple.

How old was the phone?


I went to Samsung.

I got out

I had too many problems with Apple.

How old --

Apple wouldn't fix it.

Apple wouldn't do this.

They were harassing me on every -- I called customer

service about it, and they had harassed me, and I had to

10

report that, so I said the hell with it.

11

Radio Shack, and under Sprint's program they would pay your

12

old phone off if you're on a contract.

13

have a Samsung.

14
15

So I went to

So I went and now I

How old was the phone at the time that you tried

to sell it through eBay?

16

A couple months old.

17

Okay.

18

Five months old I think.

19

Was it under any warranty program with Apple

I had a warranty through Verizon, but I had to

20
21
22

or --

cut them out.

23

I don't follow you.

24

I had to get off of Verizon.

25

Okay.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

So the phone wasn't fixable; you tried to

Page
Page147
120
121
138
33 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

34
1

sell it; you got scammed on the PayPal?

Yeah.

And eBay basically ruled against you?

Yeah, I can't even access eBay.

I can't buy

anything on eBay anymore.

Okay.

I'm hacked, every -- all my online accounts.

Okay.

Banking, bank accounts, PayPal, eBay, PACER.

10

filed complaints with the FBI, the Pennsylvania Attorney

11

General's Office, everybody.

12

When did this happen?

13

What happen?

14

The phone, the attempt to sell the phone.

15

I think January.

16

Of this year?

17

Yes, '16.

18

Did you file a complaint with the Attorney

19

I think January.

General's Office or --

20

Oh.

21

About this situation?

22

I file complaints with them all the time.

23

Okay.

24

Like I say, I am the amicus for Kathleen Kane in

25

Superior Court Case 1164 EDA 2016.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page148
121
122
139
34 of 51
318
319
356
365

I filed an amicus brief

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

35
1

May 3rd, so I'm a party to the case now.

everything to me.

They have to file

Okay.

Service me everything.

And I understand, you know, that process to some

extent, but what does it have to do with this?

it has relevance, I'm all ears.

8
9

A
the NSA.

Okay.

I mean, if

I just don't know.

In 1998 I had a meeting with an agent from

I was complaining again about things, and he told

10

me, he said, listen, Stan.

11

it's the good old boys.

He goes it's not us.

He said

This was in 1998.

12

Now, when Kathleen Kane started in the press,

13

she's been saying that the good old boys are behind her

14

problems.

15

stated for the record what the NSA agent told me about the

16

good old boys and how it relates to what she was saying.

So November 12th I wrote her a letter, and I

17

Uh-huh.

Okay.

18

She replied back the next day, said she'd keep my

19

information on file.

Ever since then from November till a

20

month or so ago I'd go up there every two weeks and deliver

21

documents to Strawberry Square to the Attorney General's

22

Office.

23

Okay.

24

I finally thought, you know what, I'll put screen

25

Tell me about the screen door locks.

door locks on on my screen doors.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page149
122
123
140
35 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

36
1

Uh-huh.

It didn't stop anything.

They'd work.

Are they still there?

I had to replace one or two of them.

Did you do that yourself?

Oh, yeah.

Do they work now?

Yes.

They'd break them.

They wouldn't work.

Well, supposedly.

I mean, one time they

10

didn't work.

11

Okay.

12

Lowe's.

13

For $30 it looks like?

14

Yeah.

15

Yes.

16

That was within two months ago.

17

Okay.

18
19

Where did you buy the replacements?

Is that what's on there?


Okay.

When did you replace them?

Sleepy's foam mattress.

I'm sorry.

Foam

memory mattress.
A

Here's the situation with that.

On the record,

20

I've been suffering from back pain since '87.

21

say '98 I've been going to the doctors on and off for it.

22

Last year I got a handicapped placard, and in the process I

23

used my medical reports regarding my back.

24

handicapped placard, and I got a long-term placard which

25

means it doesn't renew until 2020.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page150
123
124
141
36 of 51
318
319
356
365

Since I'd

So I got a

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

37
1

Okay.

Now, what they were doing is that aside from the

electromagnetic weapons, people were using some type of

device to put under my seats and under my bed that causes

excruciating pain.

6
7

Now, since '05 I was going up and getting laser


treatments to Leola Family Health Clinic in Leola.

Did you say Leola?

Yes.

10

Thank you.

11

Now, the doctor there, the chiropractor, he's the

12

one that signed off on my handicapped placard.

13

Okay.

14

He verified that if they -- they could be using

15

magnets.

It can throw my back out to cause pain.

16

that's what the Sleepy's is for.

17

All right.

18

Now, whether -- I mean, well, go ahead.

19

Have you actually found magnets?

21

No.

22

All right.

24
25

You ask

the questions.

20

23

So

You're not sure where they are within

the mattress?
A

I'm not sure.

No, I'm not.

No.

I'm not sure

how they do it, but they used to do it to my bicycle seat,

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page151
124
125
142
37 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

38
1

my car seat, my bed.

Other nights...

3
4

Now, some nights I'm fine in the bed.

And you know when they're doing it based upon

when you have the pain?

Yes, it's the only way I know.

Okay.

What's the nature of your back problem?

Herniated disc, do you have a degenerative condition?

No.

Do you have -- I mean, you're going to a

10
11
12

chiropractor.
A

Is he -- is he treating you for anything?

I was getting laser treatments, but it stopped

being effective.

13

Okay.

14

So now the only treatment really is I'm applying

15

to Medicare.

16

house.

17

medicines.

18
19

I'm trying to get a whirlpool bath put in my

I'm trying to get them to pay for that.

Okay.

And pain

And what's the diagnosis other than -- I

mean, are you -- something other than back pain I presume?

20

I have that in here, I believe.

21

I'm going to get myself some more coffee over

22

there.

23

Water would be good.

24

I assume there's water in that pitcher.

25

Would you like any coffee or water?

If not,

I can go out and get you some.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page152
125
126
143
38 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

39
1

Let me see what document I have right here.

MR. REESER:

(Off the record.)

THE WITNESS:

with me.

BY MR. REESER:

And off the record.

No, I didn't bring my medical file

Okay.

If I know what?

If you know the answer to that question.

10

What was the question?

11

The question was what's the medical diagnosis?

12

Oh, it's a medical term.

13

That's fine.

14
15

That's all right.

I mean, if you know.

I can't.

If you don't -- if you don't know,

that's fine as well.


A

I went to -- okay.

January 29th medical -- Med

16

Express Urgent Care issued me pain medications.

17

they issued me pain medications, all for back.

18

they issued me pain medications.

19

March 23rd
May 10th

In 2009 I was receiving pain medicines from

20

Dr. Sullivan at the Abbeyville Family Clinic on Abbeyille

21

Road for back pain, severe.

22

a walker some nights.

It gets severe.

I have to use

23

I think you said you went to Leola Chiropractic?

24

Yeah, Leola Family Health Clinic.

25

Family Health

Clinic.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page153
126
127
144
39 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

40
1
2
3
4

That's not a chiropractor.

That's a medical

doctor?
A

No, he's inside there.

It's a -- it's a facility

where they have different doctors.

Okay.

Dr. Newhart, Paul Newhart, he was giving me laser

treatments.

guess it was about laser therapy.

the NFL.

10

I saw an article in the paper in '05 or '06 I


Now they're using it for

But it was effective for a while, and then it

stopped being effective a couple years ago, so I stopped.

11

When did you buy the bed?

12

I bought the bed three months ago.

13

Where did you buy it at?

14

Sleepy's, Manor Shopping Center.

15

Okay.

16

Now, I put the bed on there.

You understand why

17

I put it on there?

Now, if you went and saw the bed, you

18

wouldn't think anything's wrong with it, but I'm putting it

19

on to document just what I'm telling you.

20

Okay.

You still use the mattress?

21

Oh, yeah.

Yeah, because it's a memory foam with

22

a -- it vibrates.

It moves in three different positions,

23

the head, the mid-section, and for my back it's great.

24

Queen size, king size?

25

Full.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page154
127
128
145
40 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

41
1

Is that smaller than queen?

Yeah, not by much though.

So if you're not having the back issues --

Perfectly normal.

Then it's perfectly -- okay.

Yeah.

All right.

Yeah.

10

Okay.

11

Oh, which ones?

12

How many do you have?

13

How many did I have?

14

And $2,300, is that what you paid for

it?

Laptop computers.

How many are broken?

many's listed on there?

15

There's no number there.

16

Let me see.

17

How

I don't know why those quantities

aren't in there.

18

Yeah.

19

Let me see.

The policy goes -- the policy goes

20

back to '11, so it would have been one, two -- that would

21

be right.

Two.

22

Okay.

23

Two laptops, 400 bucks apiece.

24

right.

25

That's about

What kind of laptops, what brand?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page155
128
129
146
41 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

42
1

Oh, boy.

HP.

What happened to them?

They just sabotage them.

drives and everything.

usually.

6
7

What was the last one?

Compaq.

They fry the hard

They just fry them.

That's what this document is.

Viruses

It's all in there.

So they've crashed as a result of the viruses?

The hard drives have crashed?

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

Have you looked into replacing the hard drives?

10

It is -- cost, it's not effective.

It's not --

11

it's not worth it because by the time you pay to do that,

12

it's already outdated technology, so you're going to have

13

an old processor.

14

15

sometimes --

16

You know, it just doesn't --

No, I -- I understand.

The economics of it

So what happened, so in August of last year, the

17

last laptop I replaced, I got a one-year service for Geek

18

Squad.

19

The laptops --

20

Fixing -- fixing the one I have.

21

Okay.

22

I've been in there about 20 times.

These aren't -- the ones that the Geek

Squad's fixing, they're not the HP or the Compaq?

23

Oh, no.

24

Okay.

25

That's a Lenovo I have now.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

No.

Page
Page156
129
130
147
42 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

43
1

The HP and the Compaq, how old were those?

Within a year, a year old.

When did they crash?

Well, the last one crashed August of 2015.

one before that was probably -- let's see.

Maybe 2012.

2013.

8
9

Compaq, '15.

Probably two thousand and -- maybe '13.

or to Allstate about the one that crashed in '13 before -A

No.

11

-- last month?

12

No.

13

it in bulk.

It's too time consuming.

14

litigation.

I'm too busy trying to defend myself and

15

everything else, too busy documenting things I have to

16

document.

18

I do -- no, this is the way I do this.

Okay.

I do

I'm too busy with

The next item you have is cost to repair

computers from hacking.

19

Right.

20

Which -- are you talking about the same

21

Maybe

Did you make any report to your insurance agent

10

17

The

computers?

22

Yeah.

23

The --

24

I went to -- I went to other services after Geek

25

Squad was not performing their service effectively.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page157
130
131
148
43 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

44
1

Let me hold you up for a second now.

We talked

about the HP and the Compaq, and then you said you bought a

warranty in August to have a different computer serviced

by --

A Lenovo.

-- the Geek Squad?

Right.

Denovo?

Lenovo.

10

Lenovo?

11

L-e-n-o-v-o.

12

Is that the one that you're making the claim to

13
14

have repaired?
A

I had that serviced, yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah, I had it

15

done by the people on Harrisburg Pike there.

16

moved, right there at The Grille there, near the campus.

17

forget what his name is.

18

Near F&M you mean?

19

Yeah, The Campus Grille.

He just
I

He had a computer

20

repair shop in there, but he just moved.

21

out to Liberty Place or somewhere.

22

And you paid $400 for that?

23

No.

24

Yeah.

25

Let me see.

I think he moved

That was -- to the repair?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Cost to repair computers from

Page
Page158
131
132
149
44 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

45
1

hacking.

I guess that's cumulative over the past four

years.

Okay.

That's probably what that is.


Here's what happened.

A Plus on Columbia

Avenue.

Last year I made a formal

complaint to the Lancaster DA's Office.

the detective.

goes you're going to have to do something for me.

going to have to go get a private firm, analyze your

Okay.

I met with

He goes, well, Stan, he goes, listen.

10

computer and get a report.

11

seen the detective since.

He

You're

I did that, paid for it, never

12

Okay.

13

He never returned my calls.

He never -- I guess

14

I called him out on it.

I guess he thought, you know, I

15

wasn't going to do it, or it was going to come back saying

16

there wasn't a virus in it or it wasn't hacked, but he was

17

wrong, so he flew the coop from me.

18

So the $400 is cumulative --

19

Yes.

20

-- for three different computers?

21

Three or four.

22

And this would be over how many years span?

23

Three or four years.

24

Okay.

25

Do you have the bills for any of those

repairs?

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page159
132
133
150
45 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

46
1

A lot of them are in here.

I'm sorry?

A lot of them are in here.

Okay.

No.

Why not?

You can see them right now.

Oh, sure.

I'm getting tired.

10

I had a long week, so let's

wrap this up.

11

12

items.

13

14

Could you send me copies of them?

I'm about two-thirds of the way through these

Let's make it another day then for the rest.

I've had enough.

15

Okay.

16

We can reschedule another time.

17

And I take it

I'll get a copy of the transcript?

18

I'll get you a copy of the transcript.

19

Great.

20

I would prefer to keep going.

21

No, I can't.

22
23
24
25

You don't mind breaking, do you?

I'm up since 4 o'clock most

mornings, so this is enough for me.


Q

Can you show me where those receipts are that

we've just talked about?


A

Let me see.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page160
133
134
151
46 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

47
1

Save you and me some time.

Okay.

In the folders that you're looking at right now,

That's $160.

are those copies of your receipts?

5
6

Here's one.

These are the copies of the reports from the

technical people.

Okay.

The Geek Squad was a one-time fee.

A Plus.

Okay.

Here's A Plus.

10

receipt.

11

Avenue.

12

service, the Geek Squad.

13

computer.

14

them where I got them.

Let's see.

Here's

Now I got to find the

This is what they wrote.


Okay.

Okay.

That's on Columbia

Here's my receipt for the tech

Here's my receipt for the actual

Can I have those receipts back?

I want to put

I don't want the stuff mixed up.

15

How can I get a copy of those receipts?

16

Just take them right now and get them.

17

Ask them to copy them, you'd be all right with

19

Sure.

20

Do you have other receipts for any of these other

21

items?

22

I have 30 years of receipts.

23

Here, I mean here in this building.

18

24
25

that?
Sure.

Do you have

them with you?


A

I don't know.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page161
134
135
152
47 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

48
1

Could you -- there was another one in there that

I was looking at.

piece of paper.

It was on an 11 -- 8 and a half by 11

Here, that was $160.

Let's see.

Let me go

through there quick and see if I can get the receipts.

Here's a receipt.

they changed my SIM card thinking that would stop the

hacking, but it didn't.

for -- that's just an in-take.

This is a Verizon.

This is a receipt, but it's not


These are the IC3 reports.

10

Let's see if the receipt's in here.

11

they're all the receipts I have.

12

Okay.

13

I believe.

14

What Verizon did was

Geek Squad.

No,

I mean, as far as the computers are

concerned.

15

And then there's no receipts in these documents?

16

Receipts for what?

17

Any of these items that we're talking about.

18

I don't know.

19

Okay.

20

I don't know.

21

I'll make copies of these.

22

I did not peruse all these files for receipts.

23

Would you like -- would you like me to make a

24
25

copy of that for your records?


A

No, I gave it to you.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page162
135
136
153
48 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

49
1

Okay.

I'm going to have to trust you.

changing documents on me all the time.

(Off the record.)

I got people

BY MR. REESER:

Okay.

Do you want to take these and copy them and bring

them back?

Or I can mail them back to you.

Sure.

10

Well, aren't we going to continue this?

11

Actually what I have to do is I have to report

12

back to Allstate, and they let me know if they want me to

13

continue it or not.

14
15

A
fine.

Okay.

You can take them then.

Mail them back.

16

Okay.

17

You're going to get educated.

18
19
20

Yeah, that'd be

And you will not -You're going to be

a changed man, trust me.


Q

You will not do the continuation, assuming we

have one, in the courthouse?

21

Why?

22

Because it's free.

23

Why don't we do it at Allstate's office, Allen's

24
25

office?
Q

Okay.

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

I'll see if I can arrange that.

Page
Page163
136
137
154
49 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

50
1

Or we can do it at my house.

1250 Freemont Street.

It's nice.

It's nice there.

You can come to


It's fixed up.

I have no problem with that.

All right.

I had enough of that courthouse.

Okay.

How long did this last?

Roughly an hour.

So it's about 20 after 10:00 roughly.

I don't know what time we

started.

10

That's pretty good.

11

So you want to adjourn for the day?

12

Yeah.

13

MR. REESER:

14

(The examination under oath was adjourned at

15

Okay.

Very good.

10:19 a.m.)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

Page
Page164
137
138
155
50 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

51
1

COUNTY OF DAUPHIN

2
3
4

: SS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

I, Diane F. Foltz, a Notary Public, authorized to

administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the

testimony of Stanley J. Caterbone.

8
9

I further certify that before the taking of said


statement, the witness was duly sworn; that the questions

10

and answers were taken down stenographically by the said

11

Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to

12

typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter.

13
14
15

I further certify the said statement was taken at the


time and place specified in the caption sheet hereof.
I further certify I am not a relative or employee or

16

attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or a relative or

17

employee of such attorney or counsel, or financially

18

interested directly or indirectly in this action.

19

I further certify that the said statement

20

constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the

21

said witness.

22
23

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand


this 13th day of June, 2016.

24
25

Stan J.
Stan
J. Caterbone
CaterboneUnder
Writ of
Oath
Habeus Corpus

_______________________
Diane F. Foltz, RMR
Notary Public

Page
Page165
138
139
156
51 of 51
318
319
356
365

Monday August
June22,
9, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

Richmond City Council


May 19, 2015
Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015

Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based


Weapons in Support of the Many Targeted Individuals
Suffering Symptoms of the City
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group, Originally published:

May 19, 2015

Richmond, California City Council hears from victims and advocates and votes in support of the Space
Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.

Jovanka Beckles Council Member Introduced This Resolution

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page166
139
140
157
4 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL BANS SPACED-BASED WEAPONS


COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 19, 2015
Mayor:

One is to adopt a resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Spaced-Based

Treaty to permanently ban Space-based weapons. And we have 15 speakers for this item.
Council Member Beckles, would you like to introduce this?
Beckles : I would. You know I think what I would like to do is just kind of rehash the statement of this
issue for those that dont have the agenda in front of them. The city of Richmond is a welcoming and safe
area for all of our residents. We have led the way in so many initiatives that protect and provide the rights
for all of our residents to feel safe. And so its imperative that Richmond adopt this resolution in order to
stand in solidarity with residents who claim to be under assault with spaced-based weapons that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act.
Now, the thing about this is that were not trying something new here. This is in support of what is already
there at the federal level. So we say as a council we support this treaty thats already in affect and we also
support our residents who are feeling attacked by certain kinds of weapons. And so the purpose of this
resolution is to show support for our residents that identify themselves as targeted individuals by
supporting the Space Preservation Act thats been passed by Congress and the Space Preservation Treaty
to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.
Now, many targeted individuals believe they have been personally attacked by weaponry that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act. Some years ago one of the residents who is going to talk now, I
met with her. I met with many of them, to talk about this issue. Ive also spoken with our police
department. The representative from the department was Captain Gagan to figure out how law
enforcement can support these individuals, first of all, by at least listening and not assuming, and actually
just taking reports of incidences that are reported. And the police department was open to that, and is
open to that, and are willing to work with our residents in helping them to feel safe. Because its important
that we all feel safe living in our city. And in our city we have put forth our best effort to listen and respect
the voices and wisdom and experiences of our residents.
And so I dont intend to ignore it and Im hoping that my colleagues on this (unclear word) wont ignore,
but support those who suspect they have been exposed to these types of inhumane attacks with the intent
to cause them great emotional and bodily harm. And Im encouraged by these residents, these citizens of
Richmond, who stood up to protect these other residents here. Id like to encourage other officials at the
local, state and national level to explore methods to expand support to all residents. And as many as
you can see those of us with an agenda in front of us, and those who dont have an agenda in front of
you, who may be watching, or the livecast on the web, is that there is no financial impact to this. This is
not going to cost anything and its not going to hurt anyone to pass it. But it certainly would continue to
cause emotional distress to those who are being targeted if we dont pass this. And I urge you to support
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page167
140
141
158
5 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
all of our residents in the city.
Mayor: Do we have questions from council members? Okay, Vice Mayor.
V Mayor: Just real quickly. You mentioned that this was passed by Congress. Can you tell me when that
happened because Im trying to look it up now and I thought that was just introduced in 2001 and never
was
Beckles: Actually, Ms Anderson can probably answer that question. When was it passed at the federal
level, Ms Anderson?
Anderson:

9/10/2002. Space Preservation Act, former Congressman Dennis Cosenich had introduced

this bill.
Vice Mayor: But was that
Mayor:

Were sort of getting out of our process here. I think that (word unclear) do you have other

questions?
Vice Mayor: Well, Im looking at the sheet that youre looking at. It looks like thats when the Burkley
City Council passed a resolution, not when Congress passed the law. Im looking on line at the House
website. And I know that theres, I understand that theres been multiple versions of this so I dont know if
its been passed or not. But from what it looks like here, it doesnt look like that version was passed by
Congress, so I dont know if it was. But I understand the Burkley City Council passed it on 9/10 of 2002.
Mayor: Other questions from the council?
Mayor:

So I had a couple of questions. Im looking at the resolution and it talks about the Space

Preservation Act. Can you tell me what act that was? Theres never been a Space Preservation Act passed,
right?
Beckles: It wasnt passed. It was brought forward by the Representative, the Congressman at the time.
Because there were some, you know how it goes in Washington, theres just a lot of power play. So it
never gotbut it did get passed in 2002 in Burkley. So were making ours similar to the one that was
passed in Burkley.
Mayor: Well it doesnt say anything about Burkley here. All it says is the Space Preservation Act. Are you
talking about the resolution Burkley passed or are you talking about one of the two resolutions that
Representative Cosenich introduced in 2001 and 2002?
Beckles: Well because that one didnt pass were just making reference that it was brought forward by
Dennis Cosenich, and of course politics being the way they are, it did not pass. So this is, Im making
reference to and using the Burkley model as an example of ours.
Mayor: Which one of the Cosenich resolutions did the Burkley model refer to?
Anderson: HR3616. House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: I didnt hear you, what?
Anderson: House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: 3615.
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page168
141
142
159
6 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Anderson: 3616. 1. 6.
Mayor: The research I did on this, that resolution was substantially different than HR2977.
Anderson: Yes sir.
Mayor:

And significantly it omitted any references to chem trails, particle beams, electromagnetic

radiation, plasmas, extremely low frequency or ultra-high frequency energy radiation and mind control
technology. So, the question I have is, it seemed to me, it was your intent to include all these in it, right?
So if you go with HR3616 and we approve this, it will not include any of these things I named. Was that
your intent?
Beckles: That was not my intent. My intent, and working with staff, of course, it helped put this together,
because we know that we get help with our staff. The intention was to include all of the things that people
are feeling, yeah, that people are feeling the pressures of and feeling the attacks of, and so I think thatI
dont know how much of this issue that Burkley had in theirs. But I think that to include these, and this is
the resolution saying we support this treaty, this act. Then Id like to have it in there. Because again, to
me its important that we defend, that we support and that we protect our residents. And so if these are
the things that residents are saying theyre feeling, then it should be in there.
Mayor: Well, all Burkley did, and Im looking at the Burkley resolution, and it just says, It is the will of
the council and the city of Burkley that the US Senate and House of Representatives enact, and the US
President sign and enforce the Space Preservation Act. But Im confused because there were actually two
Space Preservation Acts introduced and I think if were going to do this right, we need to define which one
were going to support. Because theyre different.
Beckles: Youre absolutely right. And I want the best one to move forward as well, and Im sure that the
residents want the best one and so.
Mayor: Which one is the best one?
Anderson: HR2977.
Mayor: So that would be HR2977.
Anderson: Yes.
Beckles: Which is the one that includes
Anderson: Everything.
Mayor: Ok, so, with that in mind, I dont have any more council people... oh I do too. Council Member
yeah, Ive got a bunch; Council Member Martinez and Council Member McLaughlin.
Martinez: Yes, I wanted to change the language to say that we endorse the intent of the act since the
act is not actually in place.
Mayor: The intent of which act?
Martinez: The intent of the second act.
Mayor: The second one is HR3616.
Beckles: Are you talking about HR2977 which includes all that, right? Which includes the chem trails. Is
that right?
Mayor: Thats my understanding of it.
Beckles: Is that right, Council Member Martinez?
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page169
142
143
160
7 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Martinez: Is that the revision? Right.
Mayor: Council Member McLaughlin.
McLaughlin: Actually I did some research on this too. Apparently Representative Cosenich didnt read
fully the first resolution that was brought forward in his name. He brought it forward based on some
recommendations. And when he realized it was drawn out to the level that it was, he pulled it. And he
brought forward the second one, which is 3616, which I think is more general.
Many of us remember, just to share some input going back, many of us remember in the 80s, Ronal
Reagan brought forth the Strategic Defense Initiative, which was later dubbed Star Wars, you know, thats
where this all came from. Basically, it was to put weapons technology into space as a global shield, as a
supposed defense against China and the Soviet Union. It was later seen as infeasible. And many others..
many people saw this as the idea to put weapons in spacewas insane. And I happen to think it was a
crazy idea, as did the population at large.
Then the Clinton administration in 1993 morphed it into the Ballistic Missile Defense. Later in 2002, which
is currently now the Missile Defense Agency. But also, along the way, in 2002 Dennis Cosenich introduced
this bill, and its the second one that he fully introduced, 3616, which basically called for a ban on spacedbased weapons. And then it was, I think it was just introduced, a co-sponsor was Representative Barbara
Lee, and at a certain point, this Space Preservation Act that was just introduced was brought to the UN
and the Space Preservation Treaty was linked with it. And actually the UN had previously addressedset
upestablished, I guess the basis for this treaty by saying they wanted a permanent ban on spaced-based
weapons that passed in the United Nations that passed 156 to 0. Then Burkley supported the 2002 the
Space Preservation Act and I believe also, the Space Preservation Treaty.
So thats what Council Member Beckles is referring to in terms of the resolution that shes brought
forward. I dont know how anyone can not support not having weapons in space when it has been
supported by the UN and also been supported, clearly stated by many experts that its infeasible this
original Ronald Reagan plan to dub this Star Wars.
I think the resolution is fine as it is. It basically says that the residentsthe well-being of our residents is
of importance to us and it also, it doesnt state pro or con in terms of what individuals are saying. But it
just refers to the fact that our residents deserve to be protected. And in general it states that spacedbased weapons are something that the city of Richmond does not support. (applause)
Mayor: Okay, so would you call the public speakers?
Anderson:

Speakers are Amy Anderson, Jesse Beltrand, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Edward Spencer, Ben

Colonson, Lisa Becker and Derrick Robinson.


Beckles: Amy Lee Anderson.
Anderson:

Yes

Mayor: Could you come over here to the podium to speak, please?
Anderson: Good evening Council Members, Council Beckles. I really want to thank you for not deviating
your plan because I went on your Facebook and I saw why you came in office and you never deviated your
plan. You said that you wanted to first put the community first and from you doing that, I want to thank

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page170
143
144
161
8 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
you first. And secondly, as a psychologist, a child psychologist, I want to thank you for putting up with
some of those pains I have suffered along this way. But I am here in happiness, in a moment of greatness.
I have a perfect city. Nowhere in the United States, no targeted individual can get this kind of support
that I have gotten. We just needed just one person, one city. And because of that, you all are our heroes,
and we want to thank you. And I can go on and say much much.
But we are dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has no
experience to fathom it. It is so sophisticated. So what we are saying to you all is please let us help you
understand enough, as someone outside looking in to our lives. Because were in pain, we are tortured
and we are humiliated every day in our lives because our lives have taken on a path. We dont even know
how or why we have this type of people on this planet who would harm in this type of way. And I just want
to thank you all. And you, Mayor, for you being in the cityworking in the service. Being in the service. For
others to do this, I know that should sadden you. (applause)
Jesse Beltrand: Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Jesse Beltrand.
Im the president of the International Center Against the Use of Covert Technologies. Our organization was
formed in 2010 in Sacramento California for the purpose to bring awareness to the general public and
legal systems around the world about serious human rights abuses with regards to the utilization of
remote influencing technologies. My colleagues and co-speakers today, hopefully well get John Hall, who
was the author of Guinea Pigs, Technologies of Control, which have been sent to each of you and signed. I
also have Dr. Edward Spencer, whos a Neurologist from the Yale School of Medicine and Ben Colonson who
is a PHD in psychology, and therapist, and co-author of a book about PTSD. I myself am a retired
Sacramento City Fire Paramedic and a recent graduate of HMI and do provide therapy to victims.
In 2010 I met Dr. Hall and when meeting him I discovered this phenomenon and asked, Why isnt
anything being done about this? He said its because of the symptomology. If everyone went to traditional
medicine and complained about what they were experiencing, they would be railroaded into the mental
health institutions. The fact of the matter is, this is affecting all demographics of society: the poor, the
rich, the elite. I see victims on a monthly basis and hear from hundreds of people every week. I currently
have over 23,000 correspondences from victims not only within, here in the United States, but around the
world.
What we have discovered is that there are hot pockets within the United States where there are victims
that are being exposed to these types of technologies. And as our speakers continue to speak they will
explain to you how that has developed. Currently the hot spots are New York, Florida, Chicago, Texas, and
California. Unfortunately, in California, the East Bay has the highest amount of victims that we have
collected in our database, within our study within our organization. This is why we are currently here
today.
Beckles: Your time has expired Sir.
Beltrand: Okay, thank you.
Beckles: Dr. John Hall. Dr. John Hall.
Beltrand: Dr. Hall is unable to be reached so were going to have Dr. Spencer here.
Spencer:

Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you. Thank you for attacking this very difficult problem. And

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page171
144
145
162
9 ofof183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
there are a lot of people around the world, especially in Europe, where I attended a counsel just recently,
in November, who thank you. Im a retired neurologist. I attended Stanford University, Yale University and
a residency at the University of California in San Francisco.
Ive studied this sort of problem for a period of time. And its been a mystery to me why medicine in
general does not approach this and study the multitude of documents that are out there. But this is the
case. And I wont answer this for you, because this is an ongoing study, ongoing problem. This is really
intense technology. Essentially what might be described as EEG heterodyning. The entire electrical activity
of the human brain can be captured in this super computer and certainly processed and then put back into
someone else. Imits science fiction. But unfortunately, its not science fiction. So naturally this is
difficult. So the technology is incredible. But basically this is a moral problem. Ethical problem. This is a
violation of the golden rule, any ethics, anything thats decent. And this is a major thing to consider. Its
also a violation of our constitutional rights. So thats an important thing to keep in mind.
To bring it back down to Richmond, I know there are a lot of targeted individuals here, and the police
encounter them. And cant understand this and help them. The medical community is hobbled by not
having a differential diagnosis. And many of the psychiatric disorders, they should say rule out
psychotronic disorders, but they dont. So they cant face it at all. Thank you.
Beckles: Ben Colonson
Colonson: I thank you all. Two minutes. Okay, lets go. Thank you all for your endurance. I see you listen
to a lot of humans. Im gonna talk really fast with two minutes to go. I am a psychologist. I have
evaluated many targeted individuals who have previously been diagnosed as delusional and psychotic and
my job is to deconstruct those diagnoses. Because of the methods of my colleagues that can actually
detect advanced nano-technology present in their bodies both through frequency emissions and
lymphaticbasicallylike when you fire a bullet theres a trajectory and the police can determine the
trajectory. There are chemical tests to do that. I was just gonna, very quickly, since its two minutes, this
is this months issue of Smithsonian Magazine that says, The Future is Here: Brain to Brain
Communication is Real. Targeted Individuals report synthetic telepathy, voices in their skull, people
putting thoughts in their head, things that up until now weve been told are complete delusion and lock
em up. But you know, the capabilities exist.
This is the National Nanotech Initiative. The last 15 years budgets of a billion and a half dollars just by the
federal governments non-black budgets. We dont know what they spend on the black budgets. Doing
experimental programs showing how nano sensors in people can give us much more data about humanity.
These technologies can be used for great good but they have apparently also been used for tremendous
evil in non-consensual human experimentation. There is great documentation on this.
I do think its a little unfortunate, that confusion about the Space Preservation Act. There arethe systems
SCADAS, theyre called. The acronym stands for Supervisory Control And Data Systems Systems. They
include a component of satellite communication from a central command post as well as components
inside the human beings, or targeted individuals. So although there is a component of these weapons
systems, and they are clearly weapons systems by the major nations on earth, theres an arms race on for
the mind at this time. Control of the human mind. The Human Brain Initiative is part of it. If I only have
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page172
145
146
163
10 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
two minutes I have to stop there. I hope you will listen to these people. They are suffering greatly as nonconsensual experimentees.
Beckles: A question, really quick, to the speaker. Could you repeat the names of those two references
that you gave, the magazines? Can you give me the names of those again, please?
Colonson: The first one, the current issue of the Smithsonian Magazine. A main stream magazine, which
in this months issue, says communicating brain to brain. And this is merely what they are releasing
publicly. The majority of the most advanced weapons systems are classified and we dont know the full
capabilities. This is just the supplemental to the presidents budget, this years Nanotechnology Initiative.
And what I didnt get to say in my two minutes is the National Registry of Environmental Professionals,
which certifies people to do all kinds of environmental quality testing, has just certified SCADAS,
Supervisory Control And Data Administration Systems, as something that needs to be studied for its
environmental impact on the environment in general. And I am part of the HSCADAS task force, how
these SCADAS systems are impacting human beings. And there are thousands of reports from targeted
individuals that crimes are being committed against them. And my intention in coming here tonight was to
support their claims so that law enforcement, with as much
Mayor: I think she asked you the names of the magazinesso
Beckles: Thank you very much. Lisa Becker.
Becker: Hi. Good evening. My name is Lisa Becker and I came here from Racine, Wisconsin. I have been
a victim of this technology for 14 years. I have been tortured for 14 years. My justice department has
failed me. My executive branch has failed me. My senators have failed me. My congressmen have failed
me. You are the only people in this country who have had the courage to even put this on the agenda.
Thats why I flew all this way to thank you, and to address you. This is torture. And it is enslavement. And
any one of these people can tell you the same thing. We have suffered desperately. And Im sorry if Im
emotional. But Im very tired. But if you wont save us, save yourselves. Because I promise you, this will
come back to every one of you. Every one of us in this country are going to be tapped into these computer
systems and you are gonna see what this feels like. Do something now while you still can. Thank you.
Council Member: I have a question. Could you be more specific in terms of how you feel that youve
beenthe injustice.
Becker: You mean in terms of the justice department failing me?
Council Member: Well in terms of your being a victim.
Becker: You mean in what Im feeling?
Council Member: Yeah, explain a little bit to me how you perceive yourself as being.
Becker:

Sure, well I have actual photographs of burns on my body. When I went to my doctor, the

response was, Well how do I know you didnt do that to yourself? How do you address that? Ive passed
two psychological evaluations. Not one but two. The one physician said, Youre sound as a bell. I have no
idea whats going on with you. When I go to sleep, when I go to try to sleep, I feel like Im being lit up
like a Christmas tree. I feel like every cell in my body just bouncing out of my body. I cant even describe
it. I get electric shock up my rectum. I get electric shock up my nose. Ive woken up with burns on the
end of my tongue. Ive had burns on the palms of both my hands. I vibrate. I vibrate. I can barely hold a
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page173
146
147
164
11 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
piece of paper without quivering. Does that answer your question?
Council Member: Im trying to find out whats the source.
Becker:

The source are these exotic weapons. They talk about, in 2977, they talk about the space

weapons, spaced-based weapons. Basically in that document they talk about exotic weapons. Thats what
were talking about. And the fact of the matter is they did complete that global surveillance network. My
cousin worked for the defense department. She worked on the global mapping of that system. And when I
told her what I was going through, all she could say was, Youre on your own. Well, I figured that out. I
figured that out. If you would please, I urge you to pass this. I realize you cant enforce it, but if you
would pass it, it might give other communities the courage to do the same thing and show our defense
department we are not the enemy. We are not to be attacked. We are not terrorists. Most of us are
defenseless women.
Mayor: Okay, thank you.
Becker: Thank you.
Beckles:

Our next speaker is Derrick Robinson, followed by Laquisha Baker, Dolores Hall, Kim, Alex,

Elizabeth Adams, Robert Swegan. Please come forward. Derrick Robinson.


Robinson: Good evening everyone. Im Derrick Robinson. In regards to the Space Preservation Act that
is before you, many of us have travelled here to say thanks very much for listening and responding to so
many that have come to you over the past couple of years. This is a momentous occasion for our
organization and for humanity. You are one of the very few governing authorities that has considered the
danger of psychotonic technologies. Research in this area has been ongoing since the 50s by government
agencies, corporations, criminal elements, and religious cults, etc. But, only since the arrival of the
internet, has this holocaust been made known to thousands of people who have found that they are
victims of psychotonic technologies. And that they have been sereptisciously victimized by them. And as
the devices proliferate and the public becomes more aware of these covert activities, legislation on a local
and national level will be needed to address the concerns with regard to a vulnerable society. Your
resolution today would be a giant step forward in ensuring the health, safety and well-being for all people.
Thank you.
Beckles: Laquisha Baker
Baker:

Hello to all the legislators, and city hall, Javanka, my girl Amy over there. I have been a

Richmond resident 40 plus years. Ive seen two of my friends try and fight this fight. But their minds are
gone and theres no coming back. My mother was a Black Panther. They killed her. She was only 58 years
old. And Im just happy at this moment that somebody in our town, our city, has opened the doors for
many people who couldnt make it, didnt make it, and were survivors of it. And I just want to say thank
you.
Beckles: Dolores Hall.
Hall: I did not know you were going to call me to speak. But I will share. I head up the Los Angeles
Freedom from Covert Harassment Group. Its a support group. And I have about 300 people that is in that
group. And I get over 400 emails on a weekly basis of people asking me to help them, begging me, please
help. No one will listen to me. I am 65 years old and as I walk here, up to this podium, Im in so much
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page174
147
148
165
12 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
pain. I have burns all over my body. Theymy doctor I had treated with for 16 years, my legs swelled up
from the electric magnetic frequencies hitting me on my legshe told me to go to the hospital. And when I
went to the hospital they were supposed to put an IV in me. They sent me to the mental ward because
they said I did this to myself. I would never hurt me. I have been a victim since 2007. You cant see this
horrific electric hitting you. Electric is invisible. You take a remote control to turn your tv, turn on your
television. It hurts so bad. I want to thank you for opening your minds and your time today. I am a retired
legal investigator. I have asked all my friends, I have very prominent friends, to help me. They cant do
anything about this. It is way, way over our heads. They say its the shadow government. It is people that
cannot be touched. Please help us.
Beckles: Kim, next speaker.
Buckner: Hello, my name is Kimberly Buckner and I have been a targeted individual for a very long time.
The things that Ive experienced due to being targeted, they have been unreal. However, I can attest that
they are very real indeed. My life has been destroyed in every possible way and every day has been a
struggle for me. I am very grateful to be before you today due to Amy Andersons due diligence and to
everyone else involved. I thank you council members for giving us targeted individuals a chance to speak
and to be heard. And I pray that these atrocities will soon be brought to an end. But we need your help.
Thank you.
Beckles: Alex
Rafter: Good evening, my name is Alec Rafter. I am an NYU graduate and have spent much of my time
working in a financial holding company in San Francisco. I have been a targeted individual for eight years
six months. Im from Lafayette, California, which is in this county. I am here to support and corroborate
what these other speakers are trying to convey. This technology exists and is being used on a mass scale.
It is torturous, brutal and inhumane. It happens everywhere I go. People dont understand the capabilities
of this technology. The person I came with here tonight was being shocked and stabbed in this very room
with a directed energy weapon while waiting to speak with the council. My ears are getting frequency
tinnitus while I was sitting here waiting for you as well as technology called voice to skull Dr. Alan Frey.
Like I said, this happens everywhere I go in Northern and Southern California. Ive been tortured all day,
all night, minute after minute, year after year after year. We need your help and support to stop this, to
save us, and to prevent this from happening to others. Please support banning these so called spacedbased weapons. Thank you very much.
Beckles: Robert Swegan
Swegan: Good evening. My name is Robert Swegan. I live in Modesto California. Im here tonight after
being targeted for 12 years with direct energy weapons, voice to skull. I wake up in the middle of the
night in excruciating pain. Theres nobody I can call. Theres nobody to help me. You know, sometimes I
have suicidal idealization because theres no one to help. You know, Ive been diagnosed schizophrenic,
delusional, at 53 and 57 years old. Im a graduate of junior college with a degree in counseling and human
service. I commend you people for what youre doing here. I want toIm here to support my friends. And
I know this has been very difficult for me and my family. My familyI have 4 children. One is in prison

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page175
148
149
166
13 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
right now. I suspect he was here for about 45 minutes. And others will not even talk to me. My familys
been fragmented. I dont tell anybody whats happening to me anymore. Its a dark secret with me. I
cannot explain to people whats happening. The police in Modesto are at least talking to me now. Theyre
not taking me down to the mental health facility. I thank you very much for listening to me.
Beckles: Marilyn Languist
Languist:

Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Marilyn Languist, Richmond resident. I want to

thank Ms Anderson for bringing this topic forward and for bringing so many speakers. I urge you to adopt
this resolution. As has been said, the original Space Preservation Act was originally introduced by
Congressman Cosenich, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Congressman Pete Stark of the
Bay Area. And this concept was also voted on and supported unanimously by the United Nations to
prohibit weaponization of space and spaced-based weapons. These are clearly not good for anyone on
earth and not good for anyone in Richmond. You have to be aware that there are a lot of exotic weapons
research programs going on. Some of them covert, some of them not covert. A former Richmond resident
sent me a lot of emails last year about a public comment period for allowing US military testing of directed
energy weapons in the Olympic peninsula in the state of Washington, which is of great concern. In terms
of the types of weapons that are affecting these individuals, before you judge the targeted individuals, I
would suggest that you listen to them, take the time to really listen deeply to their experience. Try to put
yourself in their shoes for a moment. If you can believe them, then please do what you can to support
them. If youre not sure, then I urge you to take the precautionary principle, when in doubt error on the
side of extra protection for those who are vulnerable. So please do adopt this resolution. Thank you.
Beckles: Sylvia Gray White
White: Good evening. My name is Sylvia Gray White, a very long time Richmond resident. Tonight Im so
thankful and happy that our city is looking up, waking up and standing up. Approval of this agenda item
will make an impact on the whole world and will help us to restore our mother earth and our health. The
heavy metal toxins falling down on us daily from the chem trails are done by our military without our
approval and knowledge. Lead is one of the many chemicals in the chem trails even though our
government banned it decades ago. Banned it from paint, toys, even bullets, and other manufacturing
processes. This toxin has really negatively impacted my life. Lead is very toxic and there are no safe
levels. It displaces the calcium in your bones among many other illnesses, particularly with children. The
level of lead in my body has drastically increased in the past 3 years. Ive gotta get the lead out. We need
to stop this constant daily abuse of our universal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you
cant feel good, you cant live good. I am not the only one breathing this pollution. If you breathe, youre
breathing it too. We have rights. Stand up for them! Now in order to stand Ive got to use a cane. But I
still can stand and will stand up for whats right.
Beckles: Our last speaker is Elizabeth Adams.
Adams: First and foremost Id like to pass this cell phone around. This is what electronic burns look like.
This is my 6 year old grand-daughter who has been targeted since birth. So can I just walk around and
show this to you?

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page176
149
150
167
14 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Mayor: Give it to the clerk.
Adams: This was taken less than 30 days ago at Eden hospital. Thats when you hear of the victim speak
of being electronically burned. That is my 6 year old grand-daughter. I am 59 years old. I have 6
grandchildren and 2 great grand- children. I first and foremost want to say that I thank God for every one
of you. And I mean literally from the bottom of my heart. I thank him for each one of you and I thank him
for the blessings that hes gonna bring your way just for addressing these issues. These issues are beyond
the average eye. The average eye cant even see it. So its not even worth even talking about in that
sense. I have sent each and every one of you information. Everything that I sent you is just what you
need to know. But theres one more thing left:

your local fusion center. You need to do some deep

research into your local fusion center. Just look it up on line. That is where you will find information, ill
activities of some sort, that is going on withinIm not going to say city government because I cant
pinpoint it. But you need to look into your local fusion center. Secondly, mental health of children(timer
beeping).May I finish just two minutes please?
Mayor: No, I think we need to give everybody the same amount of time. Thank you.
Adams: Okay, no problem.
Beckles: That was the last speaker.
Mayor: (lady asked to speak) Maam, you know, if you didnt sign up you cant speak. Okay, I have Vice
Mayor Meyers.
Vice Mayor:

I was just gonna briefly say that the weaponization of space as the history that was so

eloquently described by Council Member McLaughlin is something that I think is extremely immoral and we
should not be, as a nation, engaging in and so Im gonna support this resolution based on that.
Mayor: Do we have any other speakers? Okay, hearing none, do we have a motion?
Beckles: I can make a motion. I share that we adopt the resolution thats put before us.
Mayor: Motion of second?
Beckles: Pinplay has something
Mayor: Oh, Councilman Pinplay
Pinplay:

I just want to address for a second this whole idea about weaponization of space and there

seems to be this assumption that just because Ronald Reagan supported Star Wars, its automatically
become some unmitigated evil. The context in which it was considered a problem was simply because
there was this perception that Star Wars or any kind of strategic defense initiative could not be made
foolproof. And it could not be made foolproof because the opponent, particularly a very well-armed
opponent like the Soviet Union could launch like tens of thousands of dummy missiles at any one point
and so it would be almost impossible to intercept all of them and to distinguish the nuclear missiles from
the dummy missiles. And the understanding was that it would be that there could be a problem created
because based on the overestimation of the effectiveness of Star Wars, namely that America might think
that it was too effective and therefore, go for a first strike and knock out all the Soviet weapons. Or, on
the other hand, the Soviets might feel it was too effective and go for a preemptive strike beforehand. And
it was only in that specific cold war context that Star Wars was considered a horrible idea. Actually, Star
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page177
150
151
168
15 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Wars is not a particularly bad idea, the whole idea is that you can knock out someones weapons before
they enter your air space, in fact, long before they enter your air space. And this, for example, was
practiced more than 20 years ago, in the Gulf War, when the Patriot system modification of this was used
when the Patriot system knocked out some of the Iraqi missiles that were launched at Israel. And it is not
just a perfectly valid system, it is actually a particularly useful system, in the time that we have now
where there are nations that are not quite as well armed as the Soviet Union used to be in the 1980s.
Which may not have the capability to launch tremendous numbers of missiles at any one time. And, in
fact, this is a fairly useful system to have. And so this automatic knee jerk reaction that because Reagan
supported Star Wars and at the time it was considered a bad idea and so for that purpose it is considered
a bad idea forever, I just think this is a wrong understanding of the system. And I just wanted to mention
that.
Mayor: So we have Council Member McLaughlin next.
McLaughlin: So, I justthe reason I was interrupting because I dont think we should get into it. Thats
kind of way off base. I was just giving the history of this in general. I will say that there were some of us
in the 80s that were talking about a nuclear freeze like to stop the arms war rather than weapons in
space. You know, I think space should be for exploration and good things to learn, scientifically. Not for a
weapons trace.
Mayor: Wait, no, were not having anything from the audience. Council Member Martinez.
Martinez: Yes, just last week on 60 Minutes there was a special on the reintroduction to the arms war,
with people trying to develop missiles to take out communication satellites. But any kind of war effort is
wrong. And we need to do whatever we can to stop all war efforts. Now when I was in university in the
1980s for humanities class, I did a paper on a science fiction novel. What I actually did was, I took all of
the predictions in this science fiction novel, and then I went to magazines and newspapers, and I was
surprised to find that every single prediction in this science fiction novel, that was written 20 years earlier,
had already come true. And they were happening there, then, in 1980. So its easy for me to see that
things which are wrong can happen because we have the wrong mindset. We have the mindset which is a
war mindset and this proposition that was put forth by Cosenich was to change our attitudes towards one
of seeking peace, and thats why Im endorsing it.
Mayor: Okay, Vice Mayor.
Vice Mayor: Well, I want to say that I do think this debate is, it is on topic, because the debate on Star
Wars is sort of, was part of what initiated this. And what I would say, and its been said, that any sort of
in my viewthe idea that we dont have enough tools to kill each other here on earth and so that we need
to start doing it in space, that just is simply immoral. And you know, it may be that some wars are
unavoidable. That may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country to move away from that mind
set and move away from utilizing new methods of war, we should support. And so thats why I support this
resolution.
Mayor: Okay, if theres nobody else, lets vote. Wait. Council Member Pinplay.
Pinplay: So the motion before us, does that include things like chem trails and stuff, or no?

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page178
151
152
169
16 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Mayor: Well, let me, I think hes bringing up a good point, because, Im really confused. I think that the
resolution itself is very simple. It simply says, the city of Richmond thereby supports the Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty to ensure that individuals will not be targets of
spaced-based weapons. So I see that. All the testimony Ive heard tonight is about targeted individuals.
And so, I mean, Im confused. Is this about spaced-based weapons or is it about targeted individuals? And
if individuals are targeted, whos targeting them and why? I just dont understand it.
Beckles: Its simple enough. Its saying that, on the thereforeas you read, we are supporting this Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty and the reason were doing this is that
individuals will not be targets of spaced-based weapons, which is what theyre saying. All this stuff is high
technology, itsand sothats what were adopting here. And you know, whether you believe it or not, one
thing that was very clear, and Ive met with folks a lot around this issue, and some of them Im just
hearing tonight. And even the ones I heard tonight, just out of compassion for folks that are saying help
us, and us supporting this, by adopting this resolution, I think it sends out a message that, you know, we
sympathize with you, we support you, and the very least we can do is just pass this resolution to make
sure that you feel the support and love and sympathy that you deserve. Its simple, it reads right there
Mayor. Thats all were trying to pass. Whats there before you. Thats all were trying to pass. Dont
complicate it. Its simple, so vote it yes or no.
Mayor: I sympathize with everyone who is suffering some kind of affliction. But on the other hand, you
know, in 1967, the US adopted, or the President signed the treaty on the principles guarding the activities
of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies. So the
US government has acted on this, and they have, within that particular treaty, is a ban on using outer
space for military purposes. So, I just dont understand what were talking about. Are we talking about the
weaponization of space? Are we talking about chem trails? Are we talking about individuals who are being
targeted? If so, by whom and why? I mean, you know, Im just a dumb city council person and this is way,
way over my head. And I frankly think that its sort of way out of the purview of what this city council
could be taking up.
Weve got real problems here. Weve got potholed roads, weve got a budget thats out of balance, weve
got crime, weve got greenhouse gases. Weve got all these things to worry about and here Im being
asked to support a resolution that deals with things like chem trails and particle beams and plasmas and
mind control technologies. I just dont know enough about it. If I were an expert Id probably take a side,
but Im not. And so for that reason Im just not gonna support it. Maybe some time Ill learn more and be
more oriented
Beckles: Id like to call the questions.
Mayor: Council Member Bates
Bates: Well, it is confusing. Im gonna support the resolution for the simple reason that weve voted on
lot of dumber ideas than this resolution represents. And again, we know that we dont control the
universe, we dont control Congress. So this is the least of my worries. So, Im gonna support it. Now call
for the questions.
Mayor: Does anybody else want to talk about it? Okay, lets just vote.
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page179
152
153
170
17 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
Beckles: Council Member Pinplay? No. The motion passes 5-2 with Council Member Pinplay voting no,
and Mayor Butt voting no.
Bates: One reason I voted for it was there wasnt one speaker in opposition of it.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page180
153
154
171
18 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based wea...

1 of 1

http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolutio...

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Facebook

Twitter

More

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page181
154
155
172
19 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016
6/5/2016 6:44 AM

1 of 1

http://www.eastbaytimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article....

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Richmond: Space weapons resolution prompts requests to


investigate
By Karina Ioffee kioffee@bayareanewsgroup.com
East Bay Times
Posted:Mon Jun 01 18:42:20 MDT 2015

RICHMOND -- A city resolution banning space weapons within city limits has prompted dozens of calls to the Richmond Police
Department in recent days to ask the agency to investigate the alleged use of chips, bugs and other devices for mind and body
control.
On May 19, the City Council approved a resolution supporting the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning "space-based weapons," such as microchips planted in people's bodies and micro waves that supporters
believe are used by nefarious sources to harm them.
The resolution was written by Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles, who works as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County,
and aimed at "making all Richmond residents feel safe," she said.
"I don't intend to ignore the concerns from residents who say they have been exposed to these attacks that have caused them great
emotional and bodily harm," Beckles said.
The fallout has prompted worries that Richmond, which is working hard to remold its image in recent years, will be dismissed as
slightly off by the news media and other municipalities.
" I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has
used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway," joked Richmond Mayor Tom
Butt in a recent online posting.
But the issue actually started last June, when Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan was asked by Beckles to meet with residents who
said they were being targeted by space technology. Eager to show the department was sensitive to residents' concerns, Gagan
agreed.
"My desire was how to better serve this population from a public safety standpoint," said Gagan, a 20-year veteran with the
department. "There are people who have a huge amount of stress, anxiety and fear. These issues have public safety implications
no matter how far-fetched they seem."
The meeting had the best of intentions. But it appears to have also motivated conspiracy theorists who began to see the city as an
ally. Gagan began receiving invitations to speak at conferences organized by the "targeted individuals" community, and a rumor
started that the city had a task force devoted to uncovering government conspiracies. One organization even gave Gagan a
"humanitarian award" for his work on the issue.
"People were thrilled that someone was finally listening to them," Gagan said.
Since that meeting, he estimates that he's received more than 100 calls from people from as far away as Ireland who say they want
Richmond police to investigate their particular situations. Gagan always takes the time to explain that the department looks at facts
and has so far found no evidence to support concerns raised by callers.
"We try to refocus the conversation, and if they are local, get them into a managed program of medication and supervision," Gagan
said.
Contact Karina Ioffee at 510-262-2726 or kioffee@bayareanewsgroup.com. Follow her at Twitter.com/kioffee

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page182
155
156
173
20 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016
6/5/2016 6:47 AM

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From

Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com

CORROBORATING EXPERT AND FORMER NSA WHISTLEBLOWER


KAREN STEWART
DISCLOSURE OF ELECTROGAGNETIC WEAPONS USED TO KILL CERTAIN
TARGETED INDIVIDUALS DURING APRIL 10, 2016 RADIO INTERVIEW

THE DISCLOSURE
Karen Stewart graduated from Florida State University in 1979 with a BS degree in German Language
and a minor or co-major equivalent in Fine Art. She worked for NSA (National Security Agency) from
1982 to 2010. Her resume will follow.

Her video interviews can be seen on the following YOUTUBE links:

Wheel of Freedom (WUA) 4/4/16 Ex-NSA Karen Stewart


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10

NSA whistle blower Karen Stewart exposes targeted Individuals, 9/11


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMg
On March 9, 2016 I was detained and falsely imprisoned by no less than 8 NSA Security Police

on the barracks of the Headquarters of the NSA at Ft. Meade Maryland.

I was handcuffed, and

interrogated for over an hour, while my car was dog sniffed and searched. I was ordered to return to
Lancaster rather than continue on to Washington, D.C., and was ordered not to enter any federally
owned property again. The following is a video of my statement:
Statement and Video of False Imprisonment re Handcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at NSA

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page183
156
157
174
21 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Headquarters (National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland) by 8 NSA Police officers on March 9,
2015 Recorded on March 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs
Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain

and

changing

relations

among

newly

liberated

countries,

economic

and

diplomatic

developments of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in
support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from
wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned
why my work was used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited
with my work .
The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-intothe-light

The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.

KAREN STEWART'S TRANSCRIPT


First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page184
157
158
175
22 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photostalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page185
158
159
176
23 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to
facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not
assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to
report my location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle
to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit!
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page186
159
160
177
24 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or
one of my family is dead. They cant quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand
and may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply settling for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with itincluding any leader or
politician.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page187
160
161
178
25 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths

EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its


Corruption Karen Stewart

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives

February 20, 2014

3 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

At the very least, for the past few months to a year it has become increasingly evident thatalthough
not allmany agencies of the US Federal government have become increasingly dirty, perverse and
corrupt and require a deep and thorough cleaning.
The US Secret Service has previously been exposed as including claims of involvement with
prostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps,
improper use of weapons and drunken behavior and the IRS was caught and admitted to denying
Obamas political enemies (aka TEA Party, Christians, religious Jews, conservatives) their Constitutional
rights while allowing progressive groups (aka Liberals, Leftists, Marxists, Maoists, Socialists,
Communists) theirs. Andlove him, hate him or fall somewhere in-betweenEdward Snowden shone a
very bright light on the unconstitutional domestic mega-spying of one of these clandestine agencies
the National Security Agency. Thus far, under Obamas increasingly iron rule, few-to-no members of
these agencies have even been indicted by Congress for their blatant crimes against the American
people.
The NSA appears to have begun as a patriotic organization that was geared toward protecting the USA
and its citizens. Whether or not that was its original intended purpose is a subject for discussion and
speculation. However, portions of the NSA seem to have devolved into something very sinister. Todays
interview will concentrate on this agency.

NSA Analyst. Due to a number of substantive reasons, this former Analysts identity cannot be divulged
at this time and will be referred to as W. I have, however, confirmed this individuals prior employment
and credentials via a well-known NSA Whistleblower. The information disseminated to me, amongst
other things tells a sordid story of corruption and how employees are silenced into submissionvia fear
within the agency,

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page188
161
162
179
26 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

The Interview
Sher:Thanks so much for being with me, today, in order to provide essential additional information to
the public on how many of their tax dollars are really being spent. You were employed by the NSA for
over two decades. Would you tell the readers what initially attracted you to the agency as well as how it
has deteriorated over time?

Karen Stewart: Like many people from families with a strong history of serving our country, coming
out of college, I looked to find a way to best utilize my particular interests and talents in service to my
fellow Americans. The mission of the NSA it seemed to me, was to stop threats coming to our shores.
Its charter clearly targeted foreign nationals on foreign soil who did or could intend us harm. That
appealed to me as a righteous endeavor and honorable tack for my life to take.
Sher: Youve shared with me how the NSA deals with its employees who bring legitimate complaints to
their superiors. How thoroughly intimidating and threatening are their behaviors toward those who balk
at their adverse treatment? Would you give a few examples?

Karen Stewart: Apparently the nature of NSA Security degenerated under General Michael Hayden,
the previous Director of NSA (DIRNSA), who promoted a very questionable mid-level Security manager
to a power position within Security. Hayden had originally been tasked to eviscerate NSA since a very
shallow and short-sighted Congress believed that the fall of the Iron Curtain meant no danger existed
anywhere anymore that required the existence of a robust NSA presence. There evolved, under him, a
gratuitously vicious bully mindset that employees were to be intimidated at any opportunity not only to
drive them out of NSA but to cut back on people reporting problems that made NSA look bad, especially
problems involving upper management.
Under Hayden and his successor, General Keith Alexander, the filing of complaints to or requests for
investigations by the NSA EEO or the OIG (Office of the Inspector General) were often inexplicably
blown off despite adequate evidence or the presence of willing witnesses. Then the person who had
filed the complaint would be subjected to an out of cycle reinvestigation interview with Security as
well as polygraph exam, wherein the tone of the Security person was not neutralas it should bebut,
hostile with far-fetched or even ridiculous non-issues presented as potentially problematic. This was a
Security shot across the bow to warn the person that he had crossed the line by filing the complaint. If
he pursued the complaint, Security would lean on his managers to heavily discourage him from doing
what he thought was proper and was indeed a protected action under the law. If he persisted, did his
own amateur investigation, or told coworkers about the situation, he might be called down to Security
multiple times and accused of being paranoid and delusional based on his complaint, and his job
threatened.
The worse the infraction reported, especially if a high level manager looked to be involved, the more

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page189
162
163
180
27 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

severe the reaction by Security. In cases of egregious wrong-doing by a manager, Security would
review the personnel files, medical files, and financial statements to find anything they could use to
threaten or blackmail him with, or pretend to misinterpret some tidbit of information as something it
was not.
Some people were forced to sign admissions of guilt of preposterous misinterpretations of facts in order
to keep their jobs, thereby killing their credibility and complaint. When nothing was found in such files
that could be used, a false accusation of espionage or leaking classified materials ginned up by Security,
was used to justify a Security intrusion into the persons home to search for blackmail material, further
assess the interests and personality of the targeted individual (TI), and plant bugs and abscond with an
extra set of keys for further intrusions. The more the person objected to being bullied, the more heavyhanded Security became, insisting that hostility toward them indicated wrong-doing on the TIs part.
Thus the TI would become harried and harassed for a crime he never committed, if it ever
even was committed, and to repeated accusations by Security Psych services of a nonexistent mental illness, more than adequately supported by years of internal, psychological
evaluations stating he was mentally sound (Paranoia with delusions is rare and certainly
never occurs overnight, but that does not deter a Security psychologist attack dog, whose
favorite mode of attack employs reference to this malady).
The more a person stood his ground, the more personal it became to Security, which then
became dedicated to the personal destruction of the TI. Under the pretext of the fake
accusation of espionage or leaking classified information, Security would slander the
individual with his coworkers, work friends and managers to isolate him and apply yet more
pressure. Many backed away from supporting the TI in fear for their careers and maybe even
freedom. Certainly this sent a message to the workforce in the TIs area that NSA Security
was at its essence, a rogue, unaccountable and psychotic entity that was to be greatly
feared.
Once NSA Security had decided upon the removal of the TI for failing to be sufficiently
cowed, then false evidence was given to the FBI liaisons assigned to NSA. This would
engender a fraudulent FISA warrant, which loosed FBI surveillance and investigators upon
the person for a few weeks or months, further slandering him to his work and social circles
and thereby putting pressure on him by their constant presence. When the FBI would find no
basis for the accusation, they would drop the case and move on. However, at that point,
Security would send in their own personnel sans warrant, to overtly stalk and harass the TI ,
24/7.

In some instances, Security has even gone into the persons


neighborhood to recruit snitches and augment harassment with
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page190
163
164
181
28 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

hostile civilians convinced the TI is an enemy of the state, based


on baseless Security slander.
Intrusions would be made into his home to remove gathered evidence or
move things around as a psychological ploy and his car would be secretly
GPSd to facilitate vehicular stalking and aggressive driving games. There
have even been reports of pet murders by poisoning as an escalation of the
harassment with the inferred threat that perhaps it could be the TIs child or
himself next. The harassment is essentially elevated until the TI either
breaks and assaults a harasser or complains to Security about the insane
and sadistic, not to mention criminal way in which he is being mistreated.
This is what Security planned for and is ready to jump on as their
springboard to terminating his employment.
His security clearance is immediately pulled, he is warehoused in a menial job until adequate paperwork
and a back-story can be fabricated or forged to falsely present a termination due to mental instability or
illness, and the person is fired. Of course there is an appeals process, but it is thoroughly corrupted. No
matter how much evidence supports the victim and how little supports NSA, NSA always wins these
cases where it is clear the person was targeted for dismissal. Of course, this does nothing but embolden
more degenerate or criminal behavior while making it clear that the person reporting evil will be
considered the problem, and that in reality no labor laws or whistle protection laws can actually protect
an NSA employee, because real watch dog entities dont exist within NSA and state and Federal
authorities routinely turn a blind eye to the reported abuses even as they become more criminal and
seditious.
I shake my head at sycophant, disingenuous politicians who claim Edward Snowden could have or
should have gone through proper internal authorities to report the abuses and criminal acts being
committed within NSA. Would that be to the thoroughly corrupted, attack dog-watch dog entities, or the
thoroughly oblivious or compromised politicians responsible for oversight who are in fact, in the NSAs
pocket due to bribery, blackmail or stupidity?
Sher: The NSA seems to suffer from the some of the same maladies as did the recent outing of the
Secret Service. Without becoming too specific, would you give us a general idea as to advancement for
sexual favors that have occurred within the agency? How defeating is that to employees who are simply
working to protect the country while their bosses are indulging in sexual liaisons with lower level
employees?

Karen Stewart: In my career, promotions were always hard to come by, meted out perhaps every
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page191
164
165
182
29 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

five years if you were a good or exceptional worker, but male managers discovered that they held the
keys to paradise in regard to attractive or even acceptable women willing to take shortcuts. These
were the women who would make promotions in stunningly rapid succession with little to no
accomplishments - of their own, that is. While others killed themselves with years of grueling shift work
or even multiple dangerous foreign assignments only to find themselves evaluated as a 3.6 on a scale
of 5, when an attractive, morally loose recent college graduate would receive a 4.8 for essentially
alphabetizing a shelf of reference books her first 6 months on the job. This made many, many people
bitter and certainly sent the wrong signal to the hardest workers and the most talented. Though many
stopped being as dedicated to their jobs, others did indeed press ahead and worked tirelessly knowing
their reward was the mission accomplished and not likely appropriate recognition. Capable men
despaired of receiving deserved promotions and women almost feared being promoted for exceptional
work, fearing they would be assumed to be one of the typically incapable promotion bimbos among the
bloated management. Expertise and knowledge became commodities to guard and not share with new
workers, fearing you would not reap the benefits of your own work. This of course created a situation
where expertise and insight must be gained and regained from scratch, losing precious time training up
area or target experts to the detriment of the mission.
It was very discouraging to see immature or degenerate bosses spending their time flirting and chasing
skirts, the very same people who were charged with competently reviewing your work, (keeping
apprised of the big picture so people felt free to specialize their research), and whose responsibility it
was to accurately and honestly represent their people before promotion boards. But the atmosphere of
secrecy, the strict laws about divulging names of NSA employees or anything that occurred there,
emboldened certain men to believe that their wives and families would never know of their
indiscretions, and turned work time into play time for them. And now apparently young males are also
being pursued as sexual toys. One has to wonder what is being missed in the realm of highly perishable
intelligence leads by distracted managerial incompetents.
Sher: As an additional example of NSA intimidation, one of the things youd said may be shared is your
experience with the 3 Amigos. Would you tell us about them?

Karen Stewart:There were three eccentric looking older males who were often seen in the NSA OPS1
cafeteria together, whom we also got to know by word of mouth, as master electricians well-versed in
computer science. They were nicknamed by some in the analyst field as Rasputin, Santa, and Choo
Choo or the engineer, due to their highly unusual appearances and dress. One eye witness being
harassed on yet another NSA Security retaliatory witch hunt, reported seeing one of these men at her
home, on her property, when she discovered indications that her home had been broken into, her cable
box broken into, and her phone hacked, leaving tell-tale clicking sounds at regular intervals whenever
she used her phone. Any phone tap done by warrant is done at the carriers hub under their auspices
and will not click, only illegal hack jobs click.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

She noted him not only as a trespasser being

Page
Page192
165
166
183
30 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

somewhere he should not have been, but recognized him by his highly unusual appearance from work.
When she attempted to look him up in the NSA data base by career specialty, she found that what
should have been his photo, which should have been a source of pride since he was of the rank to be a
Flag Badger (Manager whose rank is senior enough to garner a photo with the American flag in the
background), was instead a photo of a desert animal called a Meercat indicating that he wanted his
identity hidden from the general NSA population.
Sher: With regards to many who have said that the NSAs collection of meta-data on all forms of
communication between legal citizens of the USA is unconstitutional, also indicated is the fact that not
one terrorist act has been stopped by said collection. It appears good old-fashioned police work is what
still gets the perp. In your opinion, is this accurate?

Karen Stewart: I think it is indeed true that the meta data collection ruse within the USA distracts
from tried and true research and investigation, which the latter method apparently DID INDEED
uncover the 9/11 plot months before it happened, well in time to have prevented it, according to two
separate analysts with whom I have spoken, one just two days after 9/11 as he broke down and
sobbed his heart out, repeating We could have saved them! We could have saved them! But they
wouldnt let us report it!, and the other several years later, who maintained the same story of being
threatened and forbidden to report any warning about 9/11, then being harassed and fired for a nonexistent mentally illness. However, it is a good means to track your political enemies and detractors and
their affiliates within the US - for future reference? It would appear much more for the self-preservation
and expansion of NSA as the ubiquitous Orwellian Big Brother than for the protection of the USA. With
the power the NSA wields, it could easily influence border control issues and immigration issues to
make us not as susceptible to terrorist intrusions and infiltrations, but that would undermine their
power grab and expansion within the US, something never intended at NSAs creation - and for good
reason.
Sher:As a former long time employee of the NSA, what do you believeif anythingcan be done to
correct the problems within the agency?

Karen Stewart:There is no doubt that NSA is now run by those sycophants and sociopaths who are
the least desirable to have in any position of such sensitivity and trust and are purging NSA ranks of
people with integrity. Compromising activity that would rightfully cost you your clearance, is now
viewed as intrinsic perks of the job once you reach a certain pay grade. These lesser leaders have
turned NSA into an American Gestapo Wanna-Be agency. NSA lost its way with non-serious super grade
playboys not mature enough for the responsibility of the job of managing and directing NSA,
compounding the problem by promoting sycophants to protect their backs as well as lightweights with
whom to have sexcapades behind office doors, but in that group also has risen opportunistic
sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to more and more power, any way they can get it, and by
conniving and ruthlessness have blown past incompetent, distracted management to change the very

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page193
166
167
184
31 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

nature of the NSA from watchman to the American people to jack booted prison guard.
If the Legislative Branch is possessed of anyone with the least bit of courage and common sense, they
would demand super clearances for those on the Intelligence Oversight Committees so that years or
decades of abusive behaviors, kingdom building, or even crimes can not continually be swept under the
rug by telling these particular politicians, You dont have the need to know, just trust us. Obviously,
they cannot be trusted. An appointment to that Committee would of course have to become much more
exclusive, requiring a thorough vetting as any job with a Top Secret clearance should. But to deal with
the toxic management at NSA now, I would require every Flag Badger and Security manager to account
for himself and what he adds to the mission. If he is pork, retire him or require him to laterally transfer
to another agency. Before that however, I would require that every single Flag Badger and every
Security group manager take a polygraph by non-NSA affiliated or non-NSA sympathetic sources to
account for the millions of dollars wasted on their vicious and illegal war on NSA employees who
dutifully report fraud, waste, abuse as well as sexual predation and treason. Those who are found to be
guilty of such things as falsifying accusations against innocent employees; fabricating false witnesses
and evidence; engaging in illegal acts of breaking and entering; falsifying FISA warrant justifications;
lying to the FBI about a targeted victims criminality; falsifying psychological assessments; subverting
lie detector exams by screaming at the targeted subject during or just before the exam to create false
impressions of guilt; hiding or destroying exonerating evidence supporting their victims claims;
intimidating or roughing up witnesses; coordinating or participating in criminal stalking and harassment
activities, illegal break-ins, illegal wire taps, organizing and paying civilian groups under the table to
augment harassment of targeted employees, and lastly, conspiring to effect or cover up any or all of
these actions. And any NSA employee in that group who pleads the 5th, should be fired and stripped of
his retirement since this type of betrayal rots a country from within. NSA must be recreated, and
returned to the stated task in their founding charter of focusing on foreign enemies overseas.
Sher: W, so much of the information youve provided is truly astounding! Thanks so much for being
with us today and I hope youll be available for another should ongoing events require one.
Click to view 3 Comments
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieves op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple
internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The
Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page194
167
168
185
32 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

1NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light Karen Stewarty

By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives

March 28, 2016

0 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

AddThis Sharing Buttons


Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to PinterestMore AddThis Share
options
In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to that column.
Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower has decided to
come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to write her story.

Her name is Karen Stewart Karen Stewart


BIO
Education

Freshman year - Schiller College, Strasbourg, Fr.


Sophomore - Senior years, graduated from Florida State University (79)
BS in German Language and a minor or co-major equivalent in fine art

Work History: 1982-2010 NSA (National Security Agency


Underwent initial retraining from 1982 - 83, on the job training to become a linguist in a needed foreign
language (chosen to train in depth in Russian since my college major, German was not in demand but I
had also studied Russian and French with good results).
Worked

various

projects

over

the

years,

not

just

USSR/Russia,

but

various

countries

researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances, weapons development and proliferation,
the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron Curtain and changing relations among newly
liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments of certain target countries. I researched and
wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian
countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what
got me fired because I questioned why my work was used to promote another employee who had no
experience with but, was credited with my work.

Note...Due to the Top Secret nature of the work, the above summary is slightly vague, by design.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page195
168
169
186
33 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

The Interview
Sher: Karen, thanks for taking the time to speak with me and its so good to have you back and this
time under your name! As a Whistleblower, what finally made you decide to come out from the
shadows?
Karen: I always intended to link my name with my story because it is a story that needs to be told, but
since I have a lawsuit against NSA (technically an appeal of an unlawful, employer action, i.e. my
termination at the 28 point year of my career for trying to request an investigation by the NSA
Inspector General), sitting under a gag order demanded by NSA, on the docket at the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in Baltimore, I could not do so without risking the
adjudication going against me for that reason alone. However, in 2015 NSA Security made the decision
to yet again engage in a massive slander campaign against me in my new location, thus breaking its
own gag order so I feel no compunction to be held to a standard required by the EEOC judge at NSAs
request that NSA itself clearly holds in utter contempt.
Sher: Since we last talked, a lot has happened with you. You have refused to drop your discrimination
lawsuit against the NSA and have shared with me that the agency has stepped up its efforts against
youpersonally.
Youre now being stalked by what appear to be NSA operatives. Is that correct? As you reported to me
they, also, seem to be using electronic emanation technology to both stop and damage you. I believe
former NSA employee and Whistleblower Russel Tice reported on this, also. This is really deep dark
side information. Would you tell the readers what theyre doing to you, [possibly] others and why?
Karen: First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page196
169
170
187
34 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011. All
was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from the
Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-stalking me
by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and NSA Security
personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon County
Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had personnel
land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of Lake Jackson
(near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking harassment
began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval Security
Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially stalk
and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security personnel to
Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of civilians
recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why
the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions
about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly
jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning multiple
people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home overnight
on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA also sought
out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be anything from
hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and monitor shortdistance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate car stalking
and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to me on a
certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to report my location
and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about
what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going for the
usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit! But I did
report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run, purposely sideswiping my
car, and botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my
spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page197
170
171
188
35 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular
internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that the
greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be decided, living in
Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.

In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to
recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009
I had researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing
phenomenon, but when electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really
grasp the concept and wondered about its existence. But I was to find out first hand
in November 2015 that it does exist and is a horrific crime against humanity.

NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons
emit multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves
modulated to radio frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I
understand yet. Now, with the help of certain mercenary and morally depraved
neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now with the intention being torture and slowkill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune
disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder
weapon for a corrupt government. At this point, when we leave the house, a
criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at
us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order to speed up death, with the help
of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department are dragging their
feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when I try to enlist their help to
come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or one of my family is dead. They cant
quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects the police or any official from
this new weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience
using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered
at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and may
have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they say you do. If they

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page198
171
172
189
36 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of simply settling for a tenth of the
cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason
and get away with itincluding any leader or politician.
Sher: Why in the world do you think the NSA simply didnt settle the suit? With all of the
documentation you have, it seems that they are guilty of the discrimination and could have spent far
less of the taxpayers money to simply pay you off and make it go away. They would, also, have
avoided this coming out into the open. Are they that arrogant and Narcissistic?
Karen: This has truly NEVER made any sense to me or any of my friends, even those who worked at
NSA. NSA could have investigated, claimed a mistake had been made and retroactively promoted me
without even addressing the unethical behavior of W&S personnel. Instead, the IG refused to
investigate, illegally of course, but I could not have made him do his job. Plus, the guilty were
instructed to blame me for what turned out to be the first leak by ex-NSA executive Thomas Drake,
despite the fact that I had no access to, knowledge of or training in the type of material he leaked
(computer technology) and he was identified as the source of that leak six months before I was fired.
The polygraph section of Security actively tried to sabotage my polygraph exams in response to the
false counter-accusation by inappropriately screaming and threatening me, making it impossible to pass
a polygraph, which ruined my first polygraph in this regard though I passed the next two of the three
given in reaction to the false accusation.
The EEOC is capped at $300,000 actual damages, no punitive allowed. My intention was to get the lost
difference in my wages as a GS-12 when I should have been a GS-14, and to get the appropriate level
of retirement. Yet, clearly, NSA has spent millions organizing and paying civilians (and greasing the
palms of crooked law enforcement) to harass, bully, intimidate,and quite obviously viciously slander
me.
Do they engage in such psychopathic behavior because they can? Because they simply have no real
oversight? The operational head of NSA Security is indeed rumored far and wide to be an actual
psychopath who is obsessed with paintings of Dantes Inferno.
A coworker who worked in NSA Human Resources says she remembered when the resumes of
inappropriate people (criminals, perverts, mentally unstable) were automatically thrown away but
suddenly when General Hayden, a former NSA Director, promoted this particular man, the resumes of
thieves, moral degenerates, etc., were then coveted by Security. She said that she was so upset that
she had to find a different job. I did read an opinion on the Anti-polygraph site that NSA Security
leadership, and hence all of Security in essence, could be said to suffer from Dark Triad personality
disorder, which is a dangerous combination of such things as (malignant) narcissism, sociopathy, etc.
Their egos are such that they are obsessed with winning at all costseven fighting to keep a known
false accusation from being proven false by their victim, because they exist in their own projected
narrative. They exist in their own lies and cannot stand being exposed. This means they follow their
own agendas. What is good for NSA Security leadership, even at the cost of NSA or the USA. Their

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page199
172
173
190
37 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

allegiances are to themselves. This has made me wonder, of late, if the woman who Security protected
instead of reprimanding or firing for sexually compromising W&S management was not a Security plant,
meant to do just that. And, in so doing, was NSA Security procuring a means to blackmail these
managers for themselves or another entity, perhaps foreign?
Sher: You have multiple photos and even drawings youve made of you stalkers. Youve also indicated
to me that the NSA has been in touch with your local law enforcement. Said law enforcement is siding
with the NSA against youa private citizen. What do your attorneys have to say about these?
Karen: At the beginning of my search for a law firm to take my case, Melville Johnson PC informed me
that I had potentially two cases, in 2009, an employment law case and a criminal case. I could only
afford to pursue the employment case since I was facing illegal termination on false pretenses within a
few months. While my lawyers have recorded the information about the new assault campaign by NSA
in Florida, thus far their pleas with the EEOC for some kind of response because their client is now in
physical danger have been completely ignored.
What has been going on in Florida is entirely criminal and could be a separate lawsuit, to even include
law enforcement in regard to their depraved negligenceif not complicity. But, at the moment, I am
concerned with surviving the relentless Directed Energy Weapons assaults. If I do not, then my family
will have to consider a wrongful death lawsuit against NSA, FBI (that refuse to get involved because
NSA is involved), and the FDLE, the TPD and Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as certain
complicit neighbors accepting a new riding mower or new carpeting in exchange for helping NSA
murder an inconvenient person who actually thought she had any Constitutional, human, or Civil
Rights.
Sher: With regards to your lawsuit, what are your current plans?
Karen: Good question. Reporting and recording the new barrage of assaults has whittled deeply into
my retainer. This was hard enough to maintain after spending about $110,000, thus far, and often
countering ridiculous and frivolous legal shenanigans by NSA to waste my money. With an outrageously
unresponsive EEOC, which may indeed be a complete and obscene sham for show, one wonders why
continue with the pretense that we exist as a nation of laws? Clearly, we do not.
The government has no desire for a level playing field to impede its quest for complete tyranny. We are
now a nation of wolves and sheeple. Im sure that after getting wind of this article, NSA will come to
the EEOC with big crocodile tears claiming they need to win by default because I broke the gag order
after they themselves spent millions, bald-faced lying to thousands of civilians, law enforcement and
(apparently) the FBI about me, invoking National Security Letters to swear them to secrecy and to hide
the true nature of their faux secret exercise in Tallahasseei.e., enticing a foolish community to stalk,
harass and commit murder for Big Brother.
But, God forbid the victim would speak out!
It truly sickens me that I spent my career trying to protect and serve my fellow Americans when not
only my government but these unworthy mercenary, sociopaths have stabbed me in the back. Some of

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page200
173
174
191
38 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

the stalkers have even been Iraqi War veteranssome of whom might not have returned alive without
my reports.
I cant think a lot about the lawsuit with each nocturnal assault leaving me wondering if I or one of my
family will not wake up tomorrow. Im sentenced to death for being a patriot. What a country. I read
Psalm 91 & 94 nightly, praying God will want to erase this growing evil from our country. But, I also
remember that Ruth Graham said a while ago, if God doesnt judge America, Hell have to apologize to
Sodom and Gomorrah.
Americans are just not the people they and we used to be and, therefore, our leaders are either
apathetic cowards who tolerate evil or potentially monsters like NSA Securitywho show that they can
be and are not responsible to anyone but themselves.
Is NSA Security even able to be reined in anymore? Or would any potential leader be found dead of a
microwave induced heart attack if he tried to? Someone ought to care but I may not be around long
enough to see it.
Sher: Thanks you so much for all youve done and I sincerely hope and pray youre wrong, Karen. Its
individuals like you who founded the United States of America on Godly principles and an unwavering
sense of ethics.
*Karen may be contacted for interviews at kams56@ME.com

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page201
174
175
192
39 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

StanJ. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

Greg Szymanskis Interview


With Julianne McKinney
Microwave Harassment and Mind Control
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group,
05/28/16

This interview contains information from Julianne McKinneys book Microwave Harassment and
Mind Control Experimentation, 1992, as well as current conditions world-wide. Years of
interviews turned Gregg Szymanski from skeptic to believer in the secret world of electronic
harassment, as harassment against Julianne McKinney has turned potentially lethal. They are
taking a stand to help TIs, Targeted Individuals, many civilians, escape this cruel harassment.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of major
source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in this harassment. I
dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV across the street on which I
saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an office environment. Gang stalked. Shows
brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated, sleek, communications operation. Why would it be
used? As I said either for entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs,
who are to be harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know
what that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the TI
looks like.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page202
175
176
193
40 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

TRANSCRIPT OF GREG SZYMANSKIS INTERVIEW WITH JULIANNE MCKINNEY


ON MICROWAVE HARASSMENT AND MIND CONTROL
Published May 28, 2016
Greg Szymanski:

(Also) I have a guest whos never given a radio interview before. Her name is

Julianne McKinney. For those of you who dont know who she is, she is an expert in electronic
harassment and surveillanceformer military background. And those of you who have followed this
story on my show, many may know who she is and the importance she has in this field.
Were just going to lay some very solid credibility to what weve been talking about. So this interviews
quite important and I want you to remember that, as we go along, shes a very, very well-read person.
Were gonna get to that in a minute. The problem on the use of electronic weaponry on a person was
when I was working in a law office. The law office I was working for severaloh a number of years ago,
the law office I worked for prided in taking cases that were difficult. And I listened to a person tell me
about the facts regarding the use of electronic weaponry. And I had a discussion with somebody else at
the law firm and we came to this conclusion causation causation causation Greg, remember that
element. Its going to be awfully difficult to link whats happening to the person. The injuries they were
alleging, to actually the person, or the defendants, that were doing it.
So it was a case, Ill be very honest with you, that I was very skeptical over. But, as a journalist, I
started to interview a number of people, and I would like to say that this issue, after a number of years,
has come up to one of the top of my list as a problem in this country.
I talked to hundreds of people all around the country that are experiencing things that are just
unbelievable. And from a standpoint of the law, you want to get justice for these people. You hate to
see their lives destroyed, and you hate to see what happens, to a person thats been harassed. But the
biggest problem is its very difficult to pinpoint whats going on.
I have a guest today who is an expert in this field. You, the public, may not know who she is. But those
of you who have been targeted and listen to my show know very well. Shes never been interviewed
before and I feel honored that shes here. Her name is Julianne McKinney. Shes had an extensive
career in the US Army as an Area Intelligence Case Officer till 1990.
Upon her return to civilian life Julianne became a member of the Association of National Security
Alumni. That is an organization of former intelligence officers dedicated to exposing excesses by the US
Intelligence Services. Julianne became the director of the Electronic Surveillance Project under their
auspices

as

such

she

authored

the

publication

Microwave

Harassment

and

Mind

Control

Experimentation in 1991. She kept that electronic surveillance project going for four years, funding it
with her own personal funds, obtained by her military benefits and pay.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page203
176
177
194
41 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Julianne did not copy write her work and it is out in the public domain for the public good. Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, the public has taken her hard copy publication and
uploaded it to several thousand domain sites over the past 15 years. It is respected as one of the most
important publications on this subject. And with that, Id like to say hello, Ms. McKinney, how are you
today?
Julianne McKinney: Please dont call me Ms. McKinney (laugh).
Greg: Okay, can I say Julianne?
Julianne: Yes, Julianne.
Greg: Now, youre an expert in surveillance and electronic harassment. The first question I have is
that, in your observation, is there a wider scale of surveillance of average people, people with no threat
to national security, in your estimation?
Julianne: I would say that most of us targeted are not, and never have been, a threat. I think that
what happened initially, when these operations began probably 30 years, ago people were singled out,
perhaps, because of some affiliation, either direct or indirect, with the United States government, and
invited attention. But they were not singled out as being a threat; they were singled out as being
lucrative targets of experimentation.
In the past 15 years, since shutting down the Electronic Surveillance Project, primarily to seek
employment, which I did seek, and did obtain, I had occasion to observe many, many, many instances
of individuals in the corporate environment being singled out and targeted simply because they were
convenient targets of opportunity. And, I have to comment on something I heard you say
Greg: Okay
Julianne:

Early on you referred to the difficulty of establishing causation in order to pursue these

claims.
Greg: That, I might add, that was made is a legal sense, based on the fact that we were nave people,
not really understand I have to be honest with youI had not understood the problem back then,
and felt it would be a difficult problem, based on the fact of how the crime was committed and knowing
how to pin that crime on someone. Go ahead.
Julianne: I understand the legal implications, certainly. There is enough literature, on the internet and
elsewhere, that establishes the existence of these weapon systems. To pinpoint, for purposes of
prosecution, to pinpoint their existence would be difficult and the position I take is that rather than
pinpoint for prosecution purposes, easy enough to single them out by electronic means to destroy
them. But I guess thats taking the matter a little far left field.
I think, frankly, we still face, until congress establishes laws that forbid the use of these technologies
for involuntary experimental purposes, that were going to get absolutely nowhere in attempting to
prosecute.
Greg:

Okay, listen, I need to take a break Julianne. And well be back in three minutes on the

Investigative Journal.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page204
177
178
195
42 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Julianne: Okay.
Greg:

Okay, back for the second half hour. My guest is Julianne McKinney. Shes an expert on

surveillance and electronic harassment. And Julianne, I gave you an introduction at the beginning of the
show.
Julianne: Yes
Greg:

A brief introduction. But I think our listeners would like to know your background and why

youre qualified to make these statements. I think its important.


Julianne: Okay.
Greg: If you could do that for us.
Julianne: Well, I would take exception to the term expert in these weapons systems.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne:

I certainly have had experience with them, having, for approximately the past 40 years,

been on the receiving end of this type of harassment. Expertise in surveillance comes with my
employment in the intelligence field. I understand what constitutes surveillance and am capable of
immediately spotting the surveillance and I can see, as in the case of gang stalking, a subject that you
have addressed on prior occasions. I can see those who I label as covert want-to-bes fumbling through
what they think are covert activities and Id find it really rather amusing if it werent so perverted in the
ultimate objective.
Im not certain what more I can add. I do have experience with these weapon systems. Ive had
sufficient opportunity over these past many years to observe the progressive threat of these
harassment operations. And Im talking specifically about electronic weapon systems.
Greg: Well, youve been a voice - I mean a strong voice - for warning people of these systems for at
least the past 10 years regarding the installation of specialized electronic equipment and utilities. What
are these electronics and what are their capabilities?
Julianne:

Their capabilities, generally, are to inflict pain in a highly focused fashion, and to alter

mental states. Certainly, when you have a frequency aimed at your brain, your mental functions tend to
alter. In amplified form, theyre sufficient, the frequencies are. They have the capacity to kill. Though
thats one reason the department of defense refers to them as less than lethal rather than nonlethal weapons. As a matter of fact, the Department of Defense has gone so far to eliminate them, to
remove them from the category of even less than lethal weapons to bury them in the category of
electronic weapons trying to make them a little bit blacker.
Greg:

Now is this protocol of surveillance and harassment seemingly patterned after a government

protocol now applied to the general civilian population?


Julianne:

Its difficult to pinpoint everything on the US government exclusively because these are

global operations.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne:

The pattern the protocols, are virtually identical on a global scale so someone is

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page205
178
179
196
43 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

overseeing the entire activity. The government obviously is complicent because otherwise these
operations would not be allowed to exist. Why? Its hard to say. Whether its for testing electronic
weapon systems for future use under combat conditions or whether ultimately there's a holocaust. (nointelligible) Its hard to say.
Greg:

Well, you know what I find interesting.how people who arent aware of this problem cant

believe its happening to begin with. And I try to mentionI have run stories about the Duplessis
Orphans. Its a program thats been verified, that the government actually used money in Canada and
the United States to do medical testing on children, on adults. Ive talked to people on the POW issue,
one Dr. Joe Douglas, who has documented how, that our government has done allowed foreign
governments to do illegal experimentation on POWs. So why would people think that they wouldnt
allow it on just average citizens? Just in your mind. Do you have an answer for people?
Julianne: Why wouldnt they allow it?
Greg: Yeah, my thing is that they do it, theyre doing it. But some people that deny it cant believe
that our government would do something like this.
Julianne: I find, even among the community of, I hate using slang terms, but the term TI is common,
referring to targeted individuals. Those are people who know they are on the receiving end of electronic
weapon systems. And even amongst TIs, there is a perception in certain areas that our government
wouldnt do this; a case of not recognizing reality. First of all if this were not being done by our
government, congress would step in because of the hundreds of complaints they have received,
thousands of complaints, no doubt, over the past 10-15 years, from citizens who recognize whats going
on. Congress, back in the early 90s, late 80s, took the position that anyone complaining about these
systems were imagining things because they simply didnt exist. In two years, by 1992, they were off
the drawing boards, and in fact, being fielded and conveyed to law enforcement agencies.
Congress recognizes that these weapon systems exist and funds them, and knows, as a result of
appropriate briefings, what the bio-effects can be. Yet they have passed no legislation prohibiting their
use under unconstrained experimental circumstances.
Thats number 1. Number 2, given the nature, given the nature, given that the systems draw on
existing power grids, it would be necessary for the FCC at a minimum, and the Department of Energy,
as a minimum, give some oversight and control over what is going on. Though obviously, those with
Congress, the FDA and the Department of Energy, the FCC and the Department of Energy are
knowledgeable and yet unwilling to do anything about it. So, there is complicity, but the question is,
whos knitting, and submitting, the US government, allowing these operations to take place?
Greg: Now from your experience, how intense is this surveillance of targeted individuals? And tell us
about the ways that the targeted that this is accomplished.
Julianne: From what I have observed, first of all I should explain that the standard that I address this
in Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, it was a pattern that was unfolding as I
was dealing with other targeted individuals whothat contacted me. It was a pattern of harassment

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page206
179
180
197
44 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

which indicated that there had been some surveillance going on, some monitoring of their private lives.
There had been entry into their houses. There was systematic harassment. And then, ultimately, as part
of a softening up process, and then ultimately, electronic harassment, which followed; which would
include the inducement of auditory input, which is now being referred to as Z2K.
In answer to your question (laugh) Im not certain if I I think Im probably missing the point there,
but in order to target someone, it requires that that person be put under surveillance, so that their
personality traits, their capacity to inter- relate with people, their capacity for corruption or noncorruption, that seems to be a critical point. And even their religion factors into it.
Following a period of harassments, they are singled out for preliminary stages of harassment which
includes gang stalking, entry of their private homes or apartments, followed by gradually intensified
and ultimately extremely intensified electronic harassment. This is the pattern that has unfolder over
and over and over.
Greg:

And so, when you, I guess what Im getting atthats a very good answer. Youre seeing a

pattern amongst these individuals. I guessyeahis there any pattern about how they choose them?
Julianne: I cant speak for men. But it appears that quite a few of the women who have been singled
out appear to be somewhat, too independent; perhaps too intelligent. Tend to live alone or tend to
pursue professional careers. Theres a heavy predominance of those types of women in the TI
community, the community of targeted individuals. Men are in a smaller proportion and seem to be
those who have a propensity to fly off the handle. Have a sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to
invite targeting. And I did mention a curious predominance of a certain lack of religion amongst TIs, as
opposed to a certain predominance of a particular religion amongst those who are participating in these
operations.
Greg: Now you mentioned this was a global problem. Have you communicated with people from across
the Atlantic regarding whats going on in other countries? Is it similar to here?
Julianne:

Its virtually identical, virtually identical. When I was running the electronic surveillance

project I was in extensive correspondence with people overseas and patterns were the same. The
nature of the gang stalking and harassment were the same.
Greg: Now, when youre talking about specific numbers I know youreyouve been following this for
years and years and years. Is there any way that you can give our listeners a kind of an idea of how
wide spread this problem is in terms numbers in our country and compared to maybe overseas?
Julianne: I would say that the person who has realized what is going on is just a drop in a bucket. The
persons whom I have seen being targeted are completely unaware of whats happening. So those who
are complaining of this are, as I said, the tip of the iceberg. I would say this is very, very, widespread.
But I cannot under the circumstances come up with any figures. Many, many, many thousands, no
doubt, are involved. But I would say that the bulk of them are running to their doctors and taking
totally unnecessary prescription drugs to cure ailments that dont exist.
Gregg: I guess that you have to ask this question even though its very difficult to answer. And you

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page207
180
181
198
45 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

mentioned, you said it earlier. But I really have to ask it because its on my mind and I know its always
in the back of everyones mind when they think of this problem. Why?? What is the major reason, I
mean, outside of just pure experimentation Im interested; for example, lets say that they have
targeted 100 people in Oklahoma. What do they, first of all, why are they doing it? Is it for, basically, a
blanket statement controlling the population? Orand, what do they do with this information once they
get it?
Julianne: I dont think they do anything with the information once they get it, other than to establish
a harassment protocol which will follow that targeted individual for the rest of his or her life. Why are
they doing it? I see a number of reasons. First, I dont know if youve done any research on the
phenomenon of capturing a percentage of the population in order to install a dictatorship. There is
always a percentage of the population, roughly 20% or so, that will buckle and throw whatever
constitutions might exist into the toilet and eagerly join the efforts at destroying the remainder of the
population.
Part of the problem or part of the objective they are seeking obviously is testing the latest and greatest
in electronic weaponry and other forms of technologies. A part of it is to control and choreograph those
who are involved in these harassment operations on the dispensing end. And it would appear that those
being targeted are simply objects who I see as ultimately being disposable. In other words, I think that
once full control is established over a major percentage of the population, and enough of the population
is silenced and unwilling to stick their necks out, that we inevitably would be heading toward a
holocaust.
Greg: The question, if I was, for example, lets say we have a person, who suspects, and lets just for
hypothetical purposes, say this person is being targeted, okay? Now, tell our listeners, because Ive
always wondered this myself, okay. Im sitting in my house and I see around me theres telephone
poles, there may be a tower in the distance that I dont see that handles the cell phones. Theres of
course a grid of electric going on around me. Ive talked to people and I try to say, how does this get
into your house? And I wanted to get your opinion, if a person is targeted, how basically are they
beginning to intrude their premises, and violate their constitutional rights, not only their rights ofnot
only trespassing on their property? Go ahead. How would that happen?
Julianne: Now, are you talking about, how would the frequencies impact upon them and how would
they first become aware of it? Or how would they first become aware of the fact that their privacy has
been violated?
Greg: Well no, I guess I didnt explain the question right. I wanted to know how they physically, are
doing it? I mean are they using a cell tower? Are they using a truck thats in the distance? How is this
being transmitted into the home to target the person and to use this weaponry on them, from your
experience?
Julianne: Well, first of all, in order to target a person you have to be able to see that person. And
while they may not be able to, they may, on entering the house, plant miniature cameras, miniature

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page208
181
182
199
46 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

microphones, as a means of, for their monitoring a person. But that is not necessarily the means by
which they hone in on a person. There are plenty of technologies that allow for the imaging of a person
that might be sitting in a chair, as you mentioned you might be.
Using infrared imagery techniques, for example, they can capture your image by monitoring the
concentration of heat emanating from your body using certain acoustical frequencies, they can detect
mass. And using sophisticated computer software, they can convert those images to likenesses on
computers, which conceivably could be used in a software program that could be connected to an
electronic weapon system. And in that context I should point out that, while devices draw on the
existing power grid, and while theyyes indeed, they do involve microwave towers
Sounds like youve got a commercial coming on
Greg:

Yes we do, and thank you for making my job easier. Well be back in 3 minutes on the

Investigative Journal.
First, Ive put this in the top 3 of my stories that I believe are important, that the American people need
to deal with, because as Ms. McKinney, who is a, I consider her an expert. She would only say shes an
authority. But let me tell you, Julianne, you are an expert in this. The reasons could be, like she said at
thebefore we went into the break, and a total testing of our population to see, basically, perhaps
maybe there is a holocaust in the future or a dictatorship in the future. And they want to see how
people react to it. That may be a simplistic way to look at it. Not a simplistic way that Julianne looked at
it but my way of explaining it.
But lets get back to some of the things here, the last few minutes that are important. What can you tell
us, Julianne, about the microwave energy on citizens in terms of the existence of such a program and
the nuts and bolts of what they do?
Julianne:

Microwave energy is only one aspect of the entire electromagnetic frequency spectrum.

Microwaves can be lethal depending upon how theyre used. Obviously in order to achieve appropriate
effects on people, they have to be pulsed, because otherwise the individual would be cooked from the
inside out. The objective of using microwaves as opposed to other electromagnetic frequencies would
be to inflict extremes of pain to cause thermal heating. Thats a common complaint which leaves a hot
spot on the scull. Again, primarily, just to inflict extremes of pain. I was just wondering, we kind of
skipped over or didnt quite complete a preceding topic.
Greg: Oh, go ahead, go ahead. Youve got free reign.
Julianne:

You were talking about the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of

microwave towers, the use of devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines. But what
wasnt addressed, what you havent mentioned, is also that these weapon systems are used by
neighbors surrounding persons who have been singled out as targets of opportunity.
Greg: Are they solicited to do this or what?
Julianne: Thats something that Ive been pondering for some time. Again, what Ive noticed is, there
seems to be a predominant, particular religion that makes it particularly easy for them to cooperate.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page209
182
183
200
47 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Greg: Well listen, lets talk about that after the break, a short break, and then Ive got something to,
some business I have to take care of for 3 4 minutes. Then well get back for our 2 nd hour with
Julianne McKinney. Well take some calls. Back in 2 minutes on the Investigative Journal.
(In this section there seemed to be jumping around, like maybe the video was edited or there was
some problem with the recording.)
by some of the Tis and thats Targeted Individuals.
That song rose to number one without any publicity on the internet. And that song called TI, well play
that again Dr. McKinney. I think it hits the nail on the head. I mean theres a lot of people out there
suffering. And I know youre one person, an authority in this field. And for my guests who are just
picking us up this hour, Dror excuse me, Julianne McKinney is a very highly regarded person in the
field of electronic weaponry, and surveillance in studying this issue. Shes a former area Intelligence
Case Officer until 1990 in the Army. And her credentials can be found, will be found, you can go to
RBNLive.com and go to my archives in the Investigative Journal and read about that. Shes well
qualified. Shes still with us this hour. And Dror excuse me, I keep calling you Dr. and you should be.
Julianne: (Laugh) Im not a Dr., thank you. Dr. Americus.
Greg: Dr. Americus. You know, thats funny. I have a doctorate in law. And nobody ever calls me that
and I hate being called that, a doctor. But Im interviewed on a Tehran TV station once every blue
moon, couple months, and they refer to me as Dr. Szymanski. And its nice to hear once in a while. Ill
be honest with you. Every two months is good enough. Otherwise they just call me the jerk on the
radio, which is better.
But, lets go from here. Youre adding such credibility to this story, adding credibility in my mind as I
speak. Because, Ive talked to hundreds of these people and was a doubting Thomas in the beginning. I
must mention that. I did not think it existed, and that was years ago. I thought people were either
insane, or crazy, or trying to get attention. But you know something? I will admit I was totally wrong
with that initialI guessthe look at the situation and have come around to fully believe in most of the
people I talk to and really sympathize with their suffering as I see their lives being ripped apart.
Are there any things you can dowere going to get into a few more things here as far as the technical
aspects of this but what can targeted individuals do to get some peace in their life? I mean thats one
thing theyre looking for. Is there anything they can do?
Julianne: (prolonged silence)
Greg: Difficult question there.
Julianne: Its very difficult to advise targeted individuals how to acquire peace. These frequencies can
be blocked or deflected. All of these frequencies I have found, some may contest this, but I have found
can beare vulnerable, and are subject to deflection. And the pain can be immediately (word unclear),
if not halted all together. Finding peace by writing to members of congress or to state legislators might
not be a better alternative because you will be treated as something worthy of the circular basket. They
just wont intervene. Writing to the various agencies and calling a meeting with them serves no useful

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page210
183
184
201
48 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

purpose either because they will say there are no laws prohibiting these types of activities. They cant,
say for example, the FBIand I was given this statement on a number of occasions.there are no laws
prohibiting experimentation with these weapon systems. Youre talking to the wrong people.
So my advice would be to do what you can to secure your premises, because so long as your house is
or apartment is being entered, you are susceptible to, in addition to being targeted by electronic
weapons, there is a potential for having drugs put in your food. And Im not exaggerating there.
Greg: I had a few targeted individuals I talked to send me some questions that Id like to ask you.
Julianne: Certainly.
Greg: And the one was Are targeted individuals also broadcast around the country via closed circuit
TV? And, What purpose does this serve? Im fully in the dark on this question, but, go ahead.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of
major source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in
this harassment. I dont know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV
across the street on which I saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an
office environment. Gang stalked. Shows brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated,
sleek,

communications

operation.

Why

would

it

be

used?

As

said

either

for

entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs, who are to be
harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you cant harass someone if you dont know what
that person looks like. So its a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the
TI looks like.
Greg: Okay, now, before I get to some more, I want to put out that call for people to call. I got a
couple emails. A lot of times Tis dont want to go public. And theyve sent me some emails. I want to
get to one in a minute. But one question I have for you is, how can people gather evidence to support
their beliefs that this is happening to them? Many people will say, well its only a lack of sleep. I mean,
you have a sleep disorder. Maybe theres a problem with your joints, I dont know. It could be anything
that the answers are when you suspect youre being targeted. What kind of evidence do you tell people
to gather to support their beliefs that this is actually happening to them.
Julianne:

Well, when youre gathering evidence, obviously you have an objective in mind and that

generally is legal. What you want to do with that evidence. Theres really nothing you can do with it. So
in the absence of that, the main thing is to try to protect yourself and to alleviate the pain that youre
experiencing. Collecting the evidence, if you were to go to, frankly, Id strongly recommend that you
keep your faculties together and avoid going to see psychiatrists and psychologists, because the pattern
that is evolving is that they are highly complicit of these operations.
And if you go to a medical doctor, you do not talk about it because medical doctors, many, are also
involved. What you do when you see a doctor is that you define your symptoms and get a very clear
statement that, well, we cant figure this out. Well, thats a clear indication that it is not indigenous,
its not part of your system. Its not coming from within you, so obviously something is happening from

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page211
184
185
202
49 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

outside. If they prescribe drugs and yet cant find the ecology, the basis for your disease, dont take
those drugs.
Greg:

Now earlier we were talking about the fact that they may, whoevers doing this, youve

delineated, youve led a good course into whatyoure tracking these people. But what I was getting at,
we never got to the point where ifyou mentioned something about a religious group that may be
targeted. What did you mean by that?
Julianne: The way I dont.well let me put it this way. Im not out to start a religious war. I have
found over the years that the persons involved, both in gang stalking.Ive made it a point to get to
know these people. Ive had to necessarily. Im not the type to
Greg: Youre talking about the perpetrators or the targets?
Julianne: The perpetrators.
Greg: Okay
Julianne: As well as theIve been drawing distinctions. And what Ive found is that the perpetrators
appear to belong predominantly to one particular religion; whereas the targeted individuals do not
belong predominantly to that particular religion.
Greg: And what is the particular religion of the perpetrators?
Julianne:

Right. So, at this stage, again, Im not particularly enthused about the idea of starting a

religious war. And I have challenged other TIs to get out there and become acquainted with, and get to
know, the people who are harassing them, to draw those distinctions themselves, because Im not
going to be making brash claims. This is something Ive observed over the past 10 years.
Greg: Thats fair enough. And maybe, perhaps, I could talk to you about it just for my own knowledge
off the air.
Julianne: That would be fine.
Greg: And I will keep your name out of it at that point and let people know what the targeted group
may be and what the other group may be.
Julianne: There is a religious influence but thats not to say these people arent just being used as
puppets by some broader interest.
Greg: Very good point. Can you stick with us one more segment of 5 minutes?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Were interviewing Julianne McKinney, our last segment. Juliannes an authority in the use of
surveillance and electronic weaponry. And this is an email question, kind of a technical one from a TI.
Let me read this to you. Perhaps you can answer it. Are the protocols for each individual modified based
to custom tailor it for the specific targeted individual? And if so, how does this process work?
Julianne: Yes indeed they are modified. There is a basic protocol that the perpetrators begin with. But
the TI contributes to the modification. A good example of that would be, if someone. Im trying to
think of a good example. If the TI feels the need to cooperate, even in the most subtle fashion, with the
persons who are harassing him or her, he or she will modify his behavior, in pathlobean condition, which

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page212
185
186
203
50 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

alters the protocol. Theyre constantly, targets are constantly monitored, and if they respond
emotionally to a particular trigger, that will be built into the protocol. If the target displays a certain
sense of guilt or embarrassment about a subject, that will be built into the protocol. Its an ongoing
process. And one thing I want to emphasize is no TI should look for a reason as to why this is going on.
Its a serious, serious mistake. I know I did that myself when they started on me and over the years I
came up with probably 6 different excuses.
Greg: Is it still going on with you?
Julianne: Oh yes. Not to the degree that it was before but certainly in very lethal form.
Greg: Now, how has this hampered your life?
Julianne: Its come close to being lethal on a number of occasions. I deal, I dealt with gang stalking
head on and I essentially put that to rest. I deal with.Ive developed a means for communicating with
perps directly and made them feel like the trailer trash that they are. So gang stalking is not one of
their favorite activities in my case. So the primary activity now is to see what I can survive in the way
of an induced brain aneurism or stroke or a heart attack.
Greg: I just had a caller who doesnt want to get on the air but wants to know, does moving help;
moving your location?
Julianne: Running, if youre talking about moving to a completely new location, no. This country is
wired to the hilt for immediate transfer. Your protocol follows you wherever you go so its a waste of
time. Moving about physically in place will not change anything. Other than, if you make a 180 degree
turn you will notice the targeting will suddenly stop because the weapon systems are programmed to
focus on a particular area of your anatomy. So if you turn, the targeting will suddenly end. If you turn
back itll hit you again.
Greg: Interesting. Now, going full circle in the last 2 minutes here, in 1991 you published Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation. This has been passed around the internet and over
thousands of domain sites over the past 15 years. Can you tell us how someone can get ahold of this
publication to be informed?
Julianne: Its not copy-writed. All they need to do is plug in my last name, McKinney, and type in the
title Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation and innumerable sites will appear and
just read it from there. It will give you a good insight into what the pattern is when harassment begins.
Greg:

Now, let me just spell your name for people that are going to do that. Thats MCKINNEY

McKinney. And then its Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation for an authority in
the field.
I guess since 1981, have you seen.I guess a question I wanted to ask, from 2001, have you seen any,
from the time of 911, has there been an increase in the last 4or 5 years, with this type of, that youve
seen, in the number of people contacting you. Has it been more wide spread since 911?
Julianne: Not since 911. WhenI would say back in the early 90s Ive seen a tremendous expansion
of these activities since the early 1990s. And it has moved forward in consistent fashion. Its become

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page213
186
187
204
51 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

ever more sophisticated and ever more wide spread. There was no sudden burst or flurry of activity
since 911.
Greg: And you have no help whatsoever with the political arena in this. Correct? Politicians will not
touch this with a 10 foot pole?
Julianne: Thats right. And even those who purport to be liberally inclined, and Im speaking about
members of the democratic party, will not touch it, because quote unquote, and they know, they know
whats going on. They dont they simply dont have the funds to be able to pursue it. All sorts of
humma humma excuses will be furnished for not pursuing something like this. Before you close.I hear
the music in the background.
Greg: We can stay another minute if you want.
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Why dont you come back for 2 minutes on the other side of the break and then well finish up.
Okay?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Okay, back with Julianne McKinney and 3 minutes on the Investigative Journal. You wanted to
say something at the break.
Julianne: I did. I want to thank you very, very much for taking on this subject. There are so few in the
media, as a matter of fact, youre the only one I know of, who has the guts to address it.
Greg: And you know, it really doesnt just in defense of every other media person. I dont think its
guts, in a sense, maybe it is. I dont consider myself having guts in this issue. I consider it to be an
issue that you need to take time to understand it. And thats what I would recommend to the people in
the media that havent touched this issue. If it isnt being down right censored by someone above you,
at least take the time to talk, Ill spend time talking to you about it. Because it took me a little time to
figure it out. And, Ill tell you what, its people like you that need to be applauded because its your
efforts that are bringing this to the forefront. Youre laying the credibility on the line. But I thank you
anyway for your kind words.
And with that, I wanted to say goodbye to you. And were going to have to move on. And well have you
on again to talk about this. And thank you so much.
Julianne: And thank you so much.
Greg: And that was Julianne McKinney. And she is an authority in the use of electronic weaponry and
microwave weaponry and she was with us for the last hour and a half.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page214
187
188
205
52 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Dr. Nick Begich Author and Expert Researcher


of Electromagnetic Weapons
Biography
Dr. Nick Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman
from Alaska, Nick Begich Sr., and political activist Pegge Begich. He is well
known in Alaska for his own political activities. He was twice elected
President of both the Alaska Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage
Council of Education. He has been pursuing independent research in the
sciences and politics for most of his adult life. Begich received Doctor of
Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa, for independent work in
health and political science, from The Open International University for
Complementary Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994.
He co-authored with
Jeane Manning the
book Angels Don't Play This HAARP; Advances in
Tesla Technology. Begich has also authored Earth
Rising - The Revolution: Toward a Thousand
Years of Peace and and his latest book Earth
Rising II- The Betrayal of Science, Society and
the Soul both with the late James Roderick. His
latest work is Controlling the Human Mind - The
Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak
Performance. Begich has published articles in
science, politics and education and is a well
known lecturer, having presented throughout the
United States and in nineteen countries. He has been featured as a guest on thousands of radio
broadcasts reporting on his research activities including new technologies, health and earth science
related issues. He has also appeared on dozens of television documentaries and other programs
throughout the world including BBC-TV, CBC-TV, TeleMundo, and others.
Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament. He has spoken on
various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen and elected officials, scientists and
others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press. He served as Tribal Administrator/Village
Planner for the Chickaloon Village Council, a federally recognized American Indian Tribe of the
Athabascan Indian Nation for five years and served four years as the Executive Director of The Lay
Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation. Currently Begich consults for tribal
organizations, private corporations and others in a number of research areas.
Dr. Begich is a single person with five adult children, and four grandchildren.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page215
188
189
206
53 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

1
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Covert Harassment Conference


1-2 October 2015, Berlin, Germany

2
3
Mind Control:
4
5

DR. NICK BEGICH


A Brave New World together with HAARP The Update

DR. BEGICH:

Hello, and thank you for being

here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for

putting this together.

8
9

Everyone hears me okay, yes?


Okay.

In the back?

Good.

10

All right.

I want to give a little bit of

11

background in terms of my interest in these areas.

12

those that don't know my family story, it really goes

13

back quite a ways.

14

For

My father was in the United States Congress in

15

the early 1970s during the Nixon Administration.

16

lost in a plane with Hale Boggs.

17

remember this if you've got a little bit of gray hair.

18

Hale Boggs was our House majority leader at the time,

19

one of the most powerful people in the United States

20

Congress.

21

strong dislike for J. Edgar Hoover, because he basically

22

read everybody's mail, tapped everybody's phones,

23

including the United States Congress, and then,

24

essentially, blackmailed political leaders to follow

25

whatever script he laid out.

Some of you may

He was also a Warren Commissioner.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page216
189
190
207
54 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

He was

He had a

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

2
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Boggs was a pretty outspoken individual.

At

the time -- it was just before the second election of

Richard Nixon -- Boggs came to Alaska to work on my

father's campaign, which would have been his second term

in the United States Congress.

Boggs, before they flew out on October 16th,

three weeks before the second election of Richard Nixon,

began to talk about this scandal brewing in Washington,

DC.

In fact, that very scandal, had it unfolded a

10

little bit differently -- for those that remember, the

11

planes disappeared.

12

Three weeks later, Nixon's elected for his

13

second term.

14

the Watergate scandal broke.

15

office.

16

moved up again.

17

Rockefeller then slid into the Vice President's slot.

18

And then one of the old Manson women from the Charles

19

Manson days tried to assassinate Ford, which would have

20

put Rockefeller in the White House.

21

It wasn't too much long after that that

Ford moved up.

Agnew was thrown out of

Then Nixon resigned.

Ford

For those that don't remember,

What would have otherwise happened, most

22

likely, the election would have taken place.

23

would have won.

24

out at the same time.

25

controlled the Congress.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Nixon

Agnew and Nixon would have been thrown


The Democrats would have
The Speaker of the House would

Page
Page217
190
191
208
55 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

3
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

have elevated to the Presidency.

have been in control.

happened and history tells us a lot about what really

happened there.

The Democrats would

But the opposite, of course,

Twenty years later there was a report, an

investigative report by a publication called "Roll Call"

in Washington, DC.

these various Congressional deaths.

crashes are kind of the hazard of political leadership,

10
11

That report was looking into all of


You know, plane

it seems like.
But in researching that, what they found in the

12

FBI files were a couple of telexes -- this goes before

13

FAX machines -- and telexes coming from California into

14

Washington, DC reported that two people had been found

15

at a crash site.

16

the FBI to determine whether they were credible.

17

follow-up telex came through saying, yes, they were.

18

That plane was never recovered.

19

officially; yet 20 years later, we find out, in fact,

20

there were.

21

Those sources were later looked at by


A

There were no survivors

So I know about conspiracies.

Conspiracies are

22

conversations that happen in a room like this when

23

there's a bunch of people standing on the outside who

24

might not agree with us.

25

the political life, even at the highest levels, things

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

But the reality is, even in

Page
Page218
191
192
209
56 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

4
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

happen.

Maybe a few decades go by before the truth is finally

revealed.

Things happen that aren't easily explained.

So I have a strong motivation foundationally in

terms of how I approach controversial issues.

do it with fear.

years.

is the absolute adversary for getting anything

accomplished on this planet.

10

I don't

I've been doing this work for over 20

Fear isn't part of the equation.

In fact, that

My interest in these areas started with HAARP.

11

And how many in this room do not know anything about

12

HAARP?

13

Okay.

Well, that's a lot better than it used

14

to be.

15

Twenty years of this work and the work of others have

16

kind of brought this into the public.

17

All right.

It used to be the other way around.

So the first image -- I'm going to use HAARP as

18

sort of the backdrop as I move into the mind control,

19

mind effects-related technology.

20

in my part of the world.

21

know if -- maybe I've come the farthest for this

22

presentation.

23

appreciate the opportunity to inform people about this

24

subject.

25

This is just an image

I come from Alaska.

I don't

But I appreciate being here and I

So HAARP is a large array, a field of antennas

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page219
192
193
210
57 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

5
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

in Alaska, currently 180 antennas.

They're

approximately 20 meters tall.

which you can see, which is the very top of these

antennas.

concentrate radiofrequency energy into a relatively

small space.

They have a cross dipole,

And what these are designed to do is focus or

If you think about the energy of a flashlight,

for instance, or a torch, as they say here in Europe, I

shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,

10

and then it broadens as you get further away from the

11

source.

12

The same is true with radiofrequency energy.

13

You can think about it as an inverted funnel starting

14

here at the transmitter and then spreading out and

15

getting thinner and thinner, less dense, which is why

16

the further you get away from radio broadcast antennas,

17

the weaker and weaker the signal.

18

With HAARP, the opposite occurs.

They have

19

figured out a way through what's called cyclotron

20

resonance, which would be focusing or concentrating the

21

energy.

22

like sort of a cork-screwing kind of motion that got

23

smaller and smaller as you move further and further away

24

from the transmitter.

25

So if you could visualize it, it would look

So it concentrates that energy or focuses that

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page220
193
194
211
58 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

6
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

energy so you can manipulate it in various ways.

the HAARP array, which was originally designed by a

gentleman, Bernard Eastlund, who's now deceased, was

intended to do a number of things as a weapons

application.

half the current size of the transmitter in Alaska.

can see the field of antennas.

90 antennas in the array.

9
10
11

This is the earlier version when it was


You

In this case there were

And here's another image as they expanded the


array to 180.

And another image showing the array.

Now, they also upgraded the technology pretty

12

substantially over the years.

13

efficient.

14

much bigger effects.

15

And so

So it became much more

So with a much smaller system you create

So what does it do?

Essentially, it's sending

16

energy or focusing energy up into an area known as the

17

ionosphere, which in this image in miles -- I apologize

18

for that -- is approximately 37 miles to 620 miles out

19

into space.

20

Now, this is a highly energized area.

If you

21

think about radiofrequency signals or shortwave signals,

22

they would come from the earth, they'd bounce off of us,

23

and then bounce back down to the earth to transmit over

24

large distances.

25

The ionosphere also is an area that can be

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page221
194
195
212
59 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

7
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

disturbed by solar radiation, radiation from the sun.

When it becomes destabilized, it interferes with

terrestrial communications of every kind.

So part of the idea in this technology was to

learn how to stabilize the ionosphere during these

periods or deliberately disrupt the ionosphere to

interfere with communications on a global basis.

8
9

Now, what caught my interest when I first


looked at this issue of HAARP was a very short article

10

in a publication, an Australian publication, that talked

11

about this big system in Alaska.

12

Now, I come from a family that's pretty

13

politically engaged.

14

Congress, my younger brother just finished a term in the

15

United States Senate.

16

politics a very long time.

17

Besides my dad being in the

My family's been involved in

Alaska is a very big region, but we're a really

18

small population; 700,000 people in our entire region.

19

And when you think about big projects, you know, you

20

think you know something about them.

21

Well, I'm reading about this project in my

22

state in a journal in Australia and I'm going, you know,

23

why doesn't anybody know about this?

24
25

And so I decided I would go in and look into


this issue independently.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And I did.

Page
Page222
195
196
213
60 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

I picked up maybe

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

8
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

30 articles and papers, design specifications, some

things, and with friends encouraging me to publish, I

published the first article that I had written on HAARP

back in 1994.

So it's been a very long time ago.

What also caught my interest was the idea that

they were primarily utilizing, in some applications,

extremely low frequency signals or ELFs.

signals that can be biologically active, can affect us

as human beings and in very specific ways.

10

These are

And in particular, certain applications of the

11

technology -- and this gives you sort of a graphic

12

illustration of the focus.

13

were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlund,

14

prior to his passing.

15

publications and in some of our work.

16

kind of a graphic showing the radiofrequency from the

17

array, moving up into the ionosphere and focusing that

18

energy.

19

These view graphs, actually,

And we utilized them in our


So this gives you

His initial concept was to create a global

20

shield, to be able to utilize the natural magnetic field

21

lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy

22

into this and then create this kind of global shielding

23

effect.

24

piercing that energy would be disrupted, like

25

satellites, intercontinental ballistic missiles,

And the idea was that any electronic device

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page223
196
197
214
61 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

9
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

virtually any electronic device that ran into this field

of energy that was being amplified would be destroyed.

Now, one of the other interesting parts of

this -- and this kind of shows that, again, utilizing

one of Eastlund's graphics.

line and then you see this cork-screwing energy going

around it.

southern polar regions into the northern polar regions.

And, in this case, they actually couple -- actually

10

utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the

11

natural energy, and then coming from the north to the

12

south, create this cork-screwing effect, which

13

accelerates the electrons and then creates this global

14

shield.

15

So you can see like a field

That energy naturally is occurring from the

Now, that was his initial concept.

And as a

16

concept, it caught the attention of a number of people

17

and eventually got funding from the Congress, initially

18

at 30 million, and over the last few decades now over

19

almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lot of

20

money, but when you consider, this is sort of the

21

pinnacle of billions of dollars spent in ionosphere

22

research over many decades.

23

What caught my attention in terms of the

24

technology of Eastlund -- I'm going to skip some of

25

these that are not so relevant -- was the idea that you

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page224
197
198
215
62 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

10
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

could manipulate the ionosphere -- and I'll use this as

a better example.

you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosphere --

so think about this energy going up and, like, a hammer

ringing a bell.

ionosphere itself vibrates and then it begins to send a

signal in the ELF range.

signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the ionosphere

which is energized then acts as a broadcast antenna in

So one of the thoughts was that if

Every time it hits that ionosphere, the

So you have a high frequency

10

the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth, and in

11

this case covering an entire hemisphere.

12

Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency

13

signals, are very long wavelengths.

14

earth and sea.

15

submarines, as an example, the depth, because short

16

wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea.

17

also used for what's called earth-penetrating

18

tomography, which in simple language or by analogy would

19

be like x-raying the earth or looking into the earth for

20

underground structures.

21

They penetrate the

They're utilized for communication with

They're

But one of the side effects of ELF is the

22

entrainment effect on the human mind.

23

signals will lock onto in what's called a frequency

24

following response.

25

techniques to create a frequency following response.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Because ELF

And you can use a lot of different

Page
Page225
198
199
216
63 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

11
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat,

which I'll explain in a few minutes.

electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the power

grid itself can be modulated in such a way to create a

signal that the human body will join with, will couple

with, and begin to follow.

of energy to accomplish this.

You can use

It doesn't take a great deal

This is the one that triggered my real interest

in HAARP, because this is the one that everybody kind of

10

ignored and said, oh.

11

well, if ELF has a biological effect, it's a side

12

effect.

13

phrase earlier today.

14

believe that it's an intended consequence.

15

intended to grade populations in very specific ways.

16

In fact, the HAARP planners said,

It's an unintended consequence.

We heard that

But I don't believe that.

It's

Now, this book was mentioned by my friend

17

earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by Zbigniew

18

Brzezinski.

19

written, actually, in 1973, when Brzezinski was at

20

Columbia University.

21

Security Adviser to President Carter.

22

the time that Kissinger and he and others were starting

23

to think about the Trilateral Commission organizing this

24

think tank, so to speak.

25

And why this is an important book, it was

This is before he became National

Now, find this book.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page226
199
200
217
64 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

This is around

I really encourage you to

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

12
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

find this book and read it, because it is not a

prediction of what will come with technology.

blueprint, in fact.

It's the

You can read this.

When I first read it -- he writes in a pretty

convoluted style.

English to understand.

read it because he predicted the economic changes that

took place, the political changes that took place in the

world over the last 40 years with a great deal of

10

accuracy.

11

prediction.

12

It's a little difficult even in


But I really encourage you to

And some will say it really wasn't the


It was the plan.

If you look within this text between Pages 54

13

and 56, you'll see a section that's dedicated to the

14

kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind

15

control technology.

16

guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald.

17

geophysicist at UCL.

18

chapter in a book and the chapter was called, "How to

19

Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Earth Day,

20

okay, so he could get away with that.

21

that book was actually published.

22

caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he said, if

23

we could ever figure out how to electronically stroke

24

the ionosphere in just the right way, we could return a

25

signal to the earth that would influence the behavior of

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And what Zbigniew referenced was a


And he was a

He wrote a book -- or, actually, a

Page
Page227
200
201
218
65 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

It was 1969 when

But what he said that

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

13
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

people over huge geographic areas.

Now, that's a pretty profound thing.

But we

didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere in 1969.

we did by the 1990s.

fact, the HAARP system that can accomplish this.

But

And that was, in fact, and is, in

So the idea was -- and it was kind of, in a

gross sort of way, primitive, if you will, but what the

intention was, was that if you could pulse the

ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you

10

could agitate the population in very specific ways.

11

could make them passive, less aggressive, or the

12

opposite by just amplifying that signal.

13

explain a little bit of that as we go on.

You

And I'll

14

The other person that comes out in the last

15

presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book he wrote,

16

"Physical Control of the Mind:

17

Society".

18

images that you saw in just this short video clip of

19

Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as

20

well showing that.

21

Toward a Psychocivilized

And this is, again, a 1960s book.

But in those days they used implants.

Those

They had

22

to physically put something in the brain.

23

Delgado originally did -- he was actually educated in

24

electrophysiology at the University of Madrid.

25

graduated in 1950.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And what Jose

He

Electrophysiology, as a degree

Page
Page228
201
202
219
66 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

14
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

field, thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years ago, most

people don't even realize that's an area of higher

education today, much less that far back.

One of my mentors, Raul Makayla (phonetic), he

actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his

area of interest was, essentially, the same, biomagnetic

and electric fields, effects on human physiology, and he

spent his career studying that.

Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was

10

mapping the brain of primates and humans by stimulating

11

various portions of the brain to figure out what was

12

responsible for what kind of activity.

13

began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways in

14

those film clips with the charging bull and he throws

15

the switch and the bull stops, to demonstrate that you

16

could take a creature from passive to highly aggressive

17

to passive to highly aggressive, just like flipping on

18

and off the lights in your living room.

19

And then he

What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that

20

you didn't need any implants.

You just needed to

21

manipulate the energy itself.

And you didn't need a

22

great deal of energy.

23

Now, we've heard -- I forget the amount of

24

energy surrounding us now.

25

believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we heard

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Was it a quintillion?

Page
Page229
202
203
220
67 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

15
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

earlier.

radiofrequency energy alone, it was 200 million times

more around us every day than nature created in 1994.

Back when I wrote the HAARP book in '94, just

Now, when you think about it, what did Delgado

discover?

of energy in the natural background noise of the earth

was sufficient to manipulate the behavior of human

beings if you could hit the right frequencies, if you

could hit those window frequencies that stimulated that

10
11

He discovered that one-fiftieth of the amount

kind of activity.
Now, if you think about this -- again, by

12

analogy, think about dialing through the radio stations

13

on a radio.

14

noise, the static, you get no clear signal.

15

you have resonance between the transmitter and the

16

receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal.

17

The same is true in our physiology.

18

you're looking at stimulating or affecting a specific

19

element in the body, molecules in the body, cell

20

structures or organ structures or even the human mind,

21

it's about manipulating the underlying energy.

22

In between the stations you get the white


But when

Whether

When you think about medical science in terms

23

of how the fork in the road is and how this kind of

24

applies to why don't we know more about this today,

25

well, there's lots of literature now.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page230
203
204
221
68 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

25,000 sources, I

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

16
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

think we heard quoted earlier today.

25,000 sources

talking about the energy interactions with the human

body.

That is a lot of information.

But what happened in medical science?

A lot of

people that went into life sciences, they were really

good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math, so

they went to life sciences.

better in the math, they went to physics.

upon a time, these two came together and we got

People who were a little


And then once

10

biophysics, which is really the root of real health

11

science.

12

you've got to get to the energetic interactions that

13

create chemical reactions that then manifest in the

14

body.

15

If you really want to get to the meat of it,

And that's what we kind of miss in so much of

16

our medicine.

17

opposed to an electromagnetic model.

18

to World War II, that fork in the road was being

19

explored pretty aggressively, the energetic models.

20

they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we ended up

21

with the pharmaceutical industry, and the results of

22

that, I think we can all not be quite so proud of.

23

We followed a pharmaceutical model as


In the '30s, prior

But

In terms of where the technology is going and

24

where a lot of the science is going, it will be

25

electromedicine that cures most of what we call

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page231
204
205
222
69 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

17
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

incurable.

debilitates human consciousness itself.

It will also be that which enhances or

Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you

didn't need implants, you just need to manipulate the

energy itself, this became kind of the essence of sort

of where everything went from there.

But I want to roll back a little bit, a little

bit back in time, and talk more about the evolution of

mind control as technology starting with the work at

10

Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, who was

11

working in the Harvard hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s.

12

You can look Estabrook up.

13

of Congress and you'll see his list of publications, and

14

I recommend that you do that.

15

Look him up at the Library

What he decided was that you could create what

16

we would call today a Manchurian candidate.

17

take certain individuals, put them in a very, very deep

18

state of hypnosis and then over a period of time train

19

them so they would be like this super spy that you could

20

send into another country and they'd hang out for a year

21

or two, but if they got captured, they wouldn't really

22

remember any of their former self, and then when they

23

came back, in this case, into the United States, that we

24

would then give them the appropriate suggestions and

25

then extract the intelligence from them.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page232
205
206
223
70 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

You could

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

18
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

And this is what Estabrook was working on.

By

the 1930s, a lot of his work was being classified and he

continued to work in this field up through the 1960s.

His last book -- and I always like to read the last

thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you a

lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things

that you might discard bits and pieces as science

enlightens you and your experience enlightens you.

what he talked about in that last book were the

10

experiments he was involved in using LSD and other

11

hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actually

12

talked about in a favorable sense.

13

And

And for those of you that remember, the CIA was

14

heavily involved in this in the 1960s and, in fact, the

15

whole area pre-1960s going back even to the Korean War,

16

which is sort of my next mark on the timeline.

17

The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic

18

young Americans come back from war and they're handing

19

out Communist leaflets on street corners, and the term

20

or the phrase brainwashing came into being.

21

where it came from.

22

after the Korean War.

23

That's

It came from that series of events

The idea of being able to manipulate people's

24

behavior and change them so profoundly became of

25

interest to the predecessor of the Central Intelligence

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page233
206
207
224
71 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

19
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Agency and then later the Central Intelligence Agency.

And what they looked at were lots of different ways to

manipulate human behavior.

Now, when I was researching my first book with

Jeane Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was

looking for a good source document that would speak to

this, because you always read about this in secondary,

tertiary sources.

surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,

And so I'm in a book room, a big

10

I really need this source.

11

conversation, I reach unconsciously behind me into a box

12

and I pull out this book.

13

And as I'm having this

This is a really interesting one.

This is

14

actually a presidential report.

15

was commissioned at the time, 1975, to look at the

16

abuses of the CIA.

17

Committee reports, which were Congressional hearings

18

that took place in the early '70s to investigate the

19

abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the kind of

20

abuses that we read about today, because nothing really

21

changed.

22

This is a report that

Now, this came out of the Church

Supposedly, this was to change things.


Now, what's in this report?

The LSD

23

experiments were in this report.

24

Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltrating civil

25

rights groups, antiwar groups, people that, essentially,

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page234
207
208
225
72 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

The idea the Central

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

20
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

opposed the government within the United States, which

was not part of their mandate, in fact, was illegal.

The fact that they were reading people's mail, utilizing

unwitting victims and experiments for mind control.

of this came out in this report in 1975.

CIA continues to do it even to this day.

All

And yet, the

Think about the kinds of activities that have

been reported pretty widely over the last few years,

whether it's digging through garbage to blackmail other

10

diplomats, which is something our Intelligence community

11

does, whether it's to send pallet loads of money into

12

countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe officials

13

as a way of doing business, or whether it's to

14

assassinate people with drones, kidnap people and

15

torture them.

16

Now, most of us don't know people like this,

17

but this is the government that I unfortunately have

18

guiding my country right now.

19

criminals.

20

couldn't happen here.

21

It's a government of

Now, people want to talk about, oh, this

It has happened here.

It's happened for

22

decades in the United States.

23

President's Commission touches the very tip of that

24

iceberg.

25

This report by the

This is another document.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page235
208
209
226
73 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

This is -- this guy,

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

21
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel and retired.

He was involved in pretty much the sort of esoteric side

of some of the government research.

chapter out of this book is called, "Low-Intensity

Conflict and Modern Technology".

Maxwell Air Force Base in 1984.

about a large -- a variety of technologies.

8
9

This book -- this

It was prepared by
And it was talking

But in this particular one, if you look at,


certainly, the subject lines, you have stimulation of ,

10

bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatment of

11

disease, healing of wounds.

12

modification in animals.

13

that are listed here were kind of under the mysterious

14

category.

15

happening in 1984.

16

You look at behavior

You know, some of these things

They couldn't really explain what was

But the idea was to stimulate research in these

17

fields.

So a number of things happened.

18

started to flow into these areas.

19

that came out in the 1980s as a result of some of this

20

was the Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook.

21

big, thick handbook.

22

of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to

23

determine the radiofrequency dosages that were required

24

to override every vital organ of the human body, whether

25

it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, just

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

A lot of money

One of the reports

It was a

It was produced by the University

Page
Page236
209
210
227
74 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

22
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

sort of preempt their natural function to be able to do

it remotely.

And the idea was to take that leap of

technology and begin to apply it into weapon systems.

Mind control.

you will remember this one.

Yeah, 2002.

about the ethics of mind control.

it exist or doesn't it exist?

"The Economist".

Cover story.

Some of

This is 2002, I believe.

And what this cover story was about was


Not saying, hey, does

It's just saying it's

10

here right now.

11

we should advance this technology, whether we should

12

limit this technology.

13

credible publication.

14

story.

15

We really need to be debating whether

"The Economist" is certainly a


Not too much happened from this

This is -- unfortunately, it's not showing up.

16

November -- you can get this one on my website.

I'll

17

give you my website, because this is a very important

18

document.

19

human experiments.

20

in history, that's like tomorrow and yesterday, right?

21

It's, like, now.

22

mind control experiments and who has the authority to

23

approve them.

24

approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the

25

case of Navy Intelligence or Naval research.

The Navy set up a new set of regulations for

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

It was approved in 2006.

You know,

And in this they specifically call out

And the persons with the authority to

Page
Page237
210
211
228
75 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

23
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Now, it's not just CIA.

Naval Intelligence

does this work.

non-lethal weapons that this falls under.

has the electromagnetic directorate, which is working in

an area called controlled effects, which deal, again,

with mind control and physiological effects on human

beings.

"Technology Horizons".

issue.

10

The Marines have a section on


The Air Force

In fact, they publish a publication called


I believe it's the June 2004

You can look it up.

The cover story is on

controlled effects.

11

Now, what are controlled effects?

The first

12

effect is attacking hardware; you know, like equipment,

13

like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of

14

electrons through circuits to disrupt those machines to

15

operate.

16

history, but using energy itself to manipulate hardware.

17

Not using bombs and bullets and the things of

The second sort of level of controlled effects

18

talked about in that article is the idea of manipulating

19

the software, the systems that run those systems, so

20

that you can disrupt the software, then you disrupt the

21

hardware, and things collapse.

22

And the third leg of controlled effects is the

23

human operator.

24

article produced by the electromagnetic director of the

25

Air Force is that we can target or create the illusion

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And what they say in this particular

Page
Page238
211
212
229
76 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

24
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

of all of the senses in the human body; sight, sound,

touch, taste, to give people complete memory sets,

complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be able to

distinguish the synthetic from the real.

Now, think about that for a moment.

What does

that do to court testimony in 20 years if this becomes

the norm?

post-traumatic stress syndrome folks, people coming back

from warfare.

They're now talking about using this for

This just sort of cleans up the garbage

10

of the mind and gets rid of that stress.

11

think that's a great idea.

12

the biggest mistake we could ever make.

13

whatever those servicemen and women were engaged in --

14

what used to happen in warfare -- what happened in World

15

War II when everybody came back, they said, I don't ever

16

want to see my children in these things, I don't want to

17

see my grandchildren in these things.

18

put down, not amplified.

19

Some people

Personally, I think that's


Because

Wars need to be

When you take the human factor out of warfare

20

and it becomes like a videogame, then our willingness to

21

withdraw from direct conflict no longer happens.

22

And think about where our military science has

23

gone.

In fact, I want to mention another very important

24

publication.

25

in the early 1980s.

It was produced by the US Army War College

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

It's called the "Revolution of

Page
Page239
212
213
230
77 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

25
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War".

particular paper was talking about revolution of

military affairs.

And this

What is that exactly?

This is a leap as important as the introduction

of gunpowder in the middle ages in Europe, as important

as atomic weapons in the last century.

they characterize it.

where we move from ordinance, from bullets, bombs,

things that rip tissue and tear things up, to

And that's how

And what this is is the leap

10

electromagnetic weapon systems that keep sort of the

11

hardware intact, but debilitate the human operator to

12

the point of being combat ineffective.

13

enhance the possibilities within our own combatants

14

while degrading the abilities of others.

15

Or conversely,

There's simple ways that you can achieve this.

16

You can introduce to the battlefield certain elemental

17

compounds that in small background amounts would not be

18

considered dangerous.

19

example.

20

body to maintain thyroid function.

21

much iodine, you'll get poisoned.

22

get sick.

23

Let me give you iodine as an

We all need a certain amount of iodine in the

So what can you do?

But if you have too


You'll die.

You'll

You can send a signal in

24

that resonates the very same signal strength and

25

frequency as iodine, you can send that signal in and the

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page240
213
214
231
78 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

26
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

body will begin to react as if its gotten this massive

load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodine

poisoning.

You check the thyroid; check the blood, it's

not there.

Mystery illness.

Something as simple as that for manipulating

large populations, not necessarily with their consent

and not necessarily with clear knowledge, and nothing

shows up in the background that would say why this

poison actually exists that would account for this.

10
11

simple way.
One of the other ways that this technology can

12

be exploited is really quite simple.

13

article produced by "Parameters", which is a military

14

publication.

15

the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can look

16

up the article name called, "The Mind has no Firewall".

17

It's a very important article.

18

about all the various ways in which you could introduce

19

mind effects or mind control technologies using modern

20

technology today.

21

written in a military journal called "Orienteer"

22

published in what is now Russia.

23

"Parameters".

There was an

You can look it up.

It's

This article talked

And the original article was actually

What's interesting about this is it said you

24

could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether it be

25

radio, TV, the Internet, now cell phones; but,

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page241
214
215
232
79 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

27
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

essentially, any of these carriers, you can modulate a

signal on them that will manipulate behavior of segments

of the population.

And the Russians demonstrated this in a couple

of different ways.

There was a program.

It was called

"Undercurrents".

Canadian Public Broadcasting System.

did two really interesting stories that I got to

participate in.

It aired in the CBC, which is the


"Undercurrents"

One was on HAARP and the other was on

10

mind control.

And on the mind control story that they

11

did -- this was a very popular program in Canada at the

12

time and this particular segment was their highest rated

13

that they had ever run.

14

who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during

15

the Reagan Administration that couldn't talk about what

16

they did in the White House, but they could talk about

17

what they observed in Russia.

And they had folks that came in

18

And one of the things that they talked about

19

was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort

20

of, this white noise and on this white noise carry a

21

signal.

22

cake.

23

these little cakes?

24

of Europe as well.

25

And so they put out this message, bring us


And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat
I guess you do that in other parts

And so at the appointed time they began to

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page242
215
216
233
80 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

28
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

broadcast this.

and on the street were bringing cake into the meeting

room without really knowing why they were doing it.

They just felt like doing it.

what they were programmed to do.

And workers from within that building

Now, this goes back.

Well, that was, in fact,

We're talking about

15-year-old technology.

And when you think about sort

of where did it go from there, in 2006, there were a

couple contracts left by DARPA, which does research for

10

the defense industry in the United States.

And DARPA

11

used to be run by a guy named Tony Tether.

Tony Tether

12

was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's.

13

Now, what they were doing then was, they had

14

left two contracts to the University of California for

15

what's called electronic telepathy.

16

telepathy.

17

a distance by analyzing the emanations coming from this

18

area, being able to analyze that and determine and

19

interpret what it is.

20

contract was to create complex signals to see if you

21

could transfer that array, so to speak, of signals into

22

another person's consciousness and whether they would

23

perceive the same images.

24
25

Okay.

Electronic

The idea of reading another person's mind at

And then the other half of the

Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher


and her late husband, Bill Van Bise, in this very same

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page243
216
217
234
81 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

29
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

area.

In fact, I have a copy of their unpublished paper

where they actually built an electronic circuit where

they could take a person in one room and a person in

another room, attach this person to that circuit and

this person to that circuit, and then, you know, the

psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares

and the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred

percent accurate with nine test subjects who had never

experienced consciously in any way any sense of

10

extrasensory perceptions or psychic perceptions.

11

did it with hardware, transferring thoughts from one to

12

the other.

13

They

Now -- which tells me it's probably a little

14

more simple than what DARPA's doing.

15

Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doing other

16

work for DARPA at the time and we had talked about him

17

in our first publication, and then actually after

18

publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's attitude

19

was, you know, some things just shouldn't be done.

20

one of the things that he had been working on was

21

whether modification technologies, which he was at that

22

time and when we first met, making that technology

23

available to the military.

24

us and others, he decided there's certain technologies

25

that are not safe in the hands of military.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

But when Ben

And

And after some dialogue with

Page
Page244
217
218
235
82 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

30
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

At one point along the course I began doing

quite a bit of work on this whole mind effects issue.

And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy Lay.

Now, Dorothy is one of the heirs to the Lay, as in

Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation.

family.

specifically as it applied to victims.

So a very wealthy

Dorothy was very interested in this technology

And so she approached me at one point and asked

if I would become a member of her board of directors for

10

a non-profit that she was setting up to deal with these

11

kinds of technologies.

12

whether I should tell you the rest of this story, and I

13

think I will, because why not?

14

And I've got to think about

So I have this thing, intuition.

All of us

15

have it.

16

do today.

17

listen, because when I really think about it, it's never

18

been wrong.

19

about it.

20

start acting on it.

21

I used to not pay as much attention to it as I


When my intuition tells me something, I

Neither has yours, if you really think


Or maybe you don't think about it and just

So my intuition said -- and this was a very

22

difficult time for me in 2002.

23

betrayed by a very good friend, economically was

24

bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I started

25

this work in '94.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

In 2002, I had been

Economically was being crushed.

Page
Page245
218
219
236
83 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

And

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

31
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

at that point I was deciding whether I was going to stay

in this work at all.

And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I

see this file and it's marked Lay.

person had contacted us needing some information and we

provided it.

way we operated is, I sold books.

bought my books.

And I remember this

And we never charge for that.

I mean, the

And people like you

And they allowed me to do this work.

I didn't write for grants where somebody could

10

manipulate me and control me and tell me what to say.

11

didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit

12

out my work.

13

book.

14

that work by buying that book.

15

two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and

16

a half million dollars over 20 years doing what I'm

17

doing right now.

I risked my own money.

I published my

And then I asked people to help me by supporting

18

A VOICE:

19

(Applause.)

20

DR. BEGICH:

And I tell you, I made

Thank you.

And the whole idea was just to

21

educate.

I didn't deal with victims.

22

reason I didn't was because I felt that that was putting

23

the cart before the horse.

24

people that the technology is real, that this could

25

really happen to people and from that foundation, and

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Okay.

And the

We first need to educate

Page
Page246
219
220
237
84 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

32
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

that became the foundation of my work in this.

So Dorothy calls me on the phone and she says,

will you be on my board?

an hour.

on your board.

And I talked to her for about

At the end of the hour, I said, no, I can't be

She said, well, why not?

I said, because my intuition is telling me I

8
9
10

really can't be on your board.


And she goes, well, I deserve more than that.
I said, okay.

I don't know your board members,

11

I don't know who your board is, but something in here is

12

saying there's a problem there and I don't want to be

13

associated with them.

14

(Applause.)

15

DR. BEGICH:

16

I got the call back.

17

you have millions.

18

what they say they're doing.

19

being done and find out for yourself.

20

diligence again.

21

So it was a couple of months later


Because I told her also, I said,
You have the ability.

And she did.

Go see if it's really


Do your due

A couple months later she came

22

back and she said, you were right.

23

me a number of ways.

24

just me now and my attorney.

25

Go research

They were defrauding

I've cleared out my board.

It's

Will you be on my board?

Now, bear in mind, I'm in a pretty desperate

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page247
220
221
238
85 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

33
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

situation economically.

At the time I have five

children at home.

have an economy that I've got to manage.

Dorothy, no, I can't be on your board.

I've got people to take care of.


And I tell

She says, well, why not?

I said, well, I need to meet you first in

person, eyeball to eyeball.

for three days.

foundation.

I said, we're going to talk

We're not going to talk about your

I want to know everything I'm ever going to

10

read about you and your family in the newspaper.

11

you to have the same knowledge level of me.

12

to know what your world view is before I join with you

13

in achieving that world view, because you have the means

14

and I have the willingness if that world view is shared.

15

So we spent a few days.

I want

And I want

We decided that I

16

could do this.

17

And we put together, as her major effort was, a

18

conference on mind effects.

19

public.

20

bring some key people together to have a conversation

21

that would be open and free.

22

And for four years I worked with her.

But it wasn't open to the

It was closed to the public.

And it was to

And one of those people I invited was Ben

23

Eastlund, who by then I'd gotten to know, had watched

24

what he had done in terms of his career.

25

connected with DARPA at the time.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page248
221
222
239
86 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

He was well

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

34
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

And I called him and I said, you know, Ben,

would you consider participating in this conference?

And he said, you know, if you had asked me this

seven or eight years ago, on a scale of one to ten, ten

being the relevance and importance of this, and one

being irrelevant and unimportant, I would have given

this a one or a two.

time I talk to Tony Tether or others at DARPA, nobody's

laughing about mind control anymore and it's a nine or a

10

He goes, but -- he goes, every

ten and, yes, I'll participate in your conference.

11

The next person I asked was Garth Nicolson.

12

Does that name ring any bells for anybody?

13

Nicolson was a full professor, I believe it was Texas

14

A&M.

15

thousand medical students.

16

whistle on Gulf War Syndrome and testified in our

17

Congress six times before his wife was fired as a

18

molecular biologist from Texas A&M.

19

they couldn't fire him.

20

him, because he was one of the first courageously enough

21

to step up to the plate and complain about what had been

22

happening in the Gulf War; we depleted uranium and some

23

of the other technologies that were being applied there.

24
25

He taught medical students.

Okay.

Garth

He taught over a

He was the guy that blew the

And he was tenured;

But they definitely harassed

Well, the best thing that ever happened to him


was he got out of the university system.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page249
222
223
240
87 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

He formed a

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

35
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

nonprofit to deal with chronic disease.

somebody that I watched maintain his course under really

difficult circumstances.

conference.

And he was

So he was invited to that

I invited the daughter of my mentor, Raul

Makayla.

one of the boards in Russia that regulates medical

applications of lasers.

Quite brilliant.

10

She's an electrophysiologist.

She serves on

She's an electrophysiologist.

We invited her.

We invited Rosalie Bertell.


Okay.

Does anyone

11

remember Rosalie Bertell?

12

passed.

13

physicist, biologist.

14

doctoral students at Berkeley.

15

It's kind of an odd combination.

16

statistician to go in to Bhopal for the World Health

17

Organization after that huge chemical disaster.

18

was considered one of the top people in the world for

19

dealing with victims of radiological experiments,

20

including electromagnetic radiation.

21

some of our work and added to it and published a book on

22

the HAARP system and its effect on human beings on this

23

sort of broad scale.

24

been through some really difficult times as well, rose

25

out of her own ashes and maintained her ethical

Also deceased now.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

A few.

Rosalie's

She was a mathematician,

She taught higher mathematics to


She was also a nun.
She was the lead

But she

She actually took

So we had invited Rosalie, who had

Page
Page250
223
224
241
88 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

36
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1
2

platform.
The other person we invited was Alexander

Kaivarainen.

Does anybody recognize that name?

He was

the former head of the USSR Academy of Science

Biophysics Department for ten years.

area that really gets into the meat of what we're

talking about here today.

believe, is deceased now also.

guys, you know, they're a lot older than me and they

And this is the

Now, what got -- Alex, I


You know, all these

10

keep dying of old age.

11

science at a young age watching a demonstration of the

12

paranormal, ESP, telepathy, these kinds of things in

13

Russia when he was a teenager.

14

caught his interest.

15

But Alex got his stimulation in

And it just really

When I met Alex, he was in his 60s and he was

16

the brightest top five physicists on the planet,

17

recognized by institutions around the world.

18

he had determined is that there were rational reasons

19

for why these things manifested.

20

this conference and actually presented a paper giving

21

the mathematics and the physics that lends itself to

22

these extrasensory possibilities, these things that the

23

military now calls anomalous human capabilities.

24

used to call it extrasensory perception or ESP, but now

25

they give it a new name because there's a lot of

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page251
224
225
242
89 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

And what

So he was invited to

We

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

37
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

connotations with that that kind of get you discredited

in certain segments of the scientific community.

So I want to talk -- roll back again a little

bit -- I want to talk about binaural beat, which I had

mentioned earlier in this presentation.

around a little bit.

not even use these things, but I think people feel more

comfortable using them.

And I jump

It's kind of my style.

The binaural beat.

I used to

We can't hear these really,

10

really low frequency signals, because the human ear

11

doesn't quite work that way.

12

the human ear won't hear.

Below a certain frequency,

13

Now, a gentleman by the name of Robert Monroe

14

developed a method using binaural beat where you could

15

send in a signal within the range of human hearing, say,

16

at 15,000 Hertz or pulses per second or cycles per

17

second, coming in one ear at, say, 15,000, another

18

signal coming in the other ear at, say, 15,007.

19

the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a

20

beat frequency of seven, the difference between the two.

21

15,000, 15,007.

22

seven pulses per second, which happens to be in the

23

upper Theta range, and this is where the brain then

24

drives to.

25

Within

The beat frequency becomes seven Hertz,

At the same time that that occurs, you get a

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page252
225
226
243
90 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

38
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

hemispheric balance, a distribution of energy across

both hemispheres of the brain, the analytical side and

the creative side and working together.

actually how human beings are supposed to function.

This is how young children predominantly function, with

more of a balance between the hemispheres, where the

energy is more balanced.

8
9

This is

And then we educate them.

And with young girls, who we say are more


intuitive and have this other operation of the brain,

10

and young boys are more analytical, and now we kind of

11

treat everybody the same so we kind of dumb them all

12

down to the same level.

13

children and you look at where their brain activity is

14

and between 3 and, say, 5 or 6 years old, they have

15

this predominant brain frequencies or a lot of Theta

16

brain frequencies coming in and then some ELF and then

17

higher frequency ranges.

18

But when you look at young

Now, what is Theta?

Theta states if we're in a

19

Theta state, we're kind of like in that dream-like state

20

between awake and asleep where you're consciously aware

21

of your dreams.

22

good deal of their time.

23

as we call it, are so active.

24

don't pay attention to that, don't pay attention to

25

that.

That's where 3 to 5 year olds spend a


That's why their imaginations,
And we keep saying, oh,

This was our first attempt to shut down the

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page253
226
227
244
91 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

39
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

intuitive combinations of the way the brain is actually

supposed to work.

In fact, for those who have a Christian

background, you know Jesus Christ himself said, look at

the little children, watch what they do.

think I heard somebody say something about this earlier,

little children come to the table kind of innocent with

a view of the world that's quite different than the rest

of ours.

You know, I

But the brain activity of children is unique

10

and we begin to take that out of them in the structure

11

of the way we educate.

12

So what Robert Monroe -- he was actually a

13

radio engineer.

14

had this really weird experience.

15

body experience, that he had that kind of threw him.

16

You know, it didn't make any sense to him.

17

began -- he also noticed that in the background there

18

was this kind of noise that he perceived.

19

He owned a bunch of radio stations.

He

It's an OBE, an outer

So he

So he began to experiment and he created this

20

technique for binaural beat.

He developed a whole

21

series.

22

binaural beat.

23

those US patents from 1994, and this is showing the

24

brain before the activity, before turning on the

25

Hemi-Sync, and this is after, showing a more even

In fact, he actually got US patents on a

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

This is an image taken out of one of

Page
Page254
227
228
245
92 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

40
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

distribution in a more rhythmic pattern in the

brainwaves as you see in the upper right-hand corner.

Let me roll back again so you can kind of see

the comparison.

activities happening all through the brain, and then a

coherent signal creating a hemispheric balance and an

optimization of brain potential.

8
9

Normal brain, kind of disorganized

So what did he do with this?

He developed a

whole series of things; audio input technology,

10

essentially, to manipulate behavior, but where you're in

11

control of that manipulation.

12

smoking, you get his CD on quit smoking.

13

brain in such a way, becomes compelling, very affective.

14

So you want to quit


It affects the

Sleep disorders can be addressed in this way.

15

They have someone be able to relax, meditation,

16

concentration, accelerated learning.

17

things can be done.

18

over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now

19

his daughter doing the work of working with thousands of

20

people to determine which signals actually created which

21

effects and then developing technology that they could

22

place in the hands of individuals to make the choice on

23

how to use it.

24
25

A whole array of

And they did this by working with,

Now, that's kind of an interesting way of


looking at technology.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

It was my area of interest, in

Page
Page255
228
229
246
93 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

41
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

the beginning of all of this work, was not looking for

the dark side of all of this, but in the mid-'80s I got

very interested in light and sound stimulation of the

brain that capitalized on sound signals and flickering

light for brain entrainment.

the brain will follow that external signal or what's

called FFR, frequency following response.

little energy.

Entrain the brain where

So very

Let me roll back to Delgado again.

10

One-fiftieth of the amount of energy the earth creates

11

is sufficient to move your brain into very specific

12

states.

13

just another technique for altering brain activity that

14

might be beneficial, but you're in control of it, not

15

somebody else.

16

Dialing that radio up, if you will.

This is

I'm going to skip some of these just because

17

they're not so relevant.

18

images and let me just go back into the whole dialogue

19

of this, mind effects.

20

And I'm going to close the

When I think about sort of where do we go with

21

this conference, when we put that conference together

22

with the Lay Institute, our purpose was to put together

23

these really good thinkers to try and see if we could

24

create a synergy between them.

25

And when I first got interested in doing

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page256
229
230
247
94 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

42
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

something actively in science, it wasn't about HAARP and

it wasn't about mind control.

would play -- and I was working in a government office

at the time, and it was -- my friend said, you make your

living with your left foot.

living, but the rest of my creativity could be engaged

elsewhere and me working in bureaucracy was really a bad

match.

The role that I thought I

Because I could make my

But the point was, my youngest son, when I was

10

getting really frustrated with my work, said, change

11

channels.

12

You know, I'm thinking about this, because I

13

had just given him this discussion about creativity was

14

like changing the channels on the TV set, right, and so

15

he's feeding it back, time to change the channels, Dad.

16

So I thought about it.

And what I decided I

17

would do is -- I read independently in science over 20

18

years.

19

say, one guy in one branch of science.

20

if this person could ever meet that person, you could

21

really see something happen.

22

I had read some really compelling things from,


I thought, boy,

And the first paper I actually ever presented

23

in science, I was 19 and it was at another obscure

24

conference that I ended up in on biorhythm research.

25

And my paper was contrasting at that time the Soviet

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page257
230
231
248
95 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

43
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

method of research versus the US method.

method was compartmentalization, separate.

distill things down to the smallest subspecialty and

then push these people into a corner and let them do

this bit of the research.

other people over here and ten other groups over there

and fifteen groups over there, and somewhere all of this

stuff comes together and it gets really sloppy.

It's sloppy because there's a lot of repetition; it's

10

Now, the US
You know,

And then you've got nine

Okay.

very expensive.

11

Now, the Russians, Soviets at the time, they

12

didn't have the money for that kind of research, to

13

spread it out that way, and they used a very different

14

method.

15

fields, even though they didn't seem like they should

16

connect.

17

together to develop science.

18

at the exposures that we had seen earlier, what are the

19

regulatory exposures of electromagnetic fields, the

20

Russians in the '90s and the '80s were a thousand times

21

more stringent than they were in the US.

22

They took experts from all of these different

They put them in the same room to work

Well, why was it?

That's why when you look

Because they had actually

23

made the observations that we hadn't made and actually

24

connected the dots in a way to say, hey, this is

25

dangerous.

That doesn't mean they followed their own

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page258
231
232
249
96 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

44
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

regulations, because they probably didn't.

whatever was expeditious there.

recognized the physiological responses to

electromagnetic fields and the fact that you could

manipulate it.

They did

But at least they

What was discovered by a guy named Allan Frey,

he was looking at microwaves, and he discovered that

there's this flickering effect, but it only occurred

when you pulse-modulated the signal.

And if you look

10

at -- I heard earlier, it's always scalars.

11

scalars.

12

fields as we think about them.

13

It's not vectors.

It's always

It's not electromagnetic

But if you look at the ones that affect human

14

psychology and physiology, if you look at those signals,

15

they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.

16

They're like the punch, like punching that ionosphere to

17

create the ELF.

18

modulations on these other carriers are meant to trigger

19

that effect by you entraining to that pulse, that

20

firing, or some submodulation being carried on a general

21

carrier.

22

It's like those signals.

Those

Now, if you remember the first Gulf War, the

23

first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi Army just

24

sort of gave up.

25

just like school children on their first fire drill

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

The fourth largest Army in the world

Page
Page259
232
233
250
97 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

45
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

throwing their hands up and surrendering, you know,

thousands of guys to a few dozen.

Now, I speculated on this.

What was that about?


And then it was

Scottish media that later reported on this and said it

was Project Solo, which was a project operated by the

United States.

flying over the country at the time and it was taking

and piggybacking the signal on the radio broadcast going

into the region that were broadcasting the Muslim music

10
11

And what we did is we had this C-130

and prayers.
So all these guys are in their bunkers

12

listening to their favorite radio station.

Unbeknownst

13

to them, the subsignals being played on that broadcast

14

created anxiety, high levels of anxiety and fear.

15

then you watched this Army just collapse under this.

16

And that was kind of the -- in my view, the

And

17

first test of could you really do this, could you do it

18

in this adversarial environment.

19

And one of my friends joked, hey, it's the

20

perfect Republican weapon, right?

21

hardware in place, but totally wipe out the population.

22

Zbigniew Brzezinski said, in between two ways,

23

it doesn't matter if it's Republicans or Conservatives.

24

They just use different rationale for accomplishing

25

their political ends.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

You can keep all the

On the conservative side, the

Page
Page260
233
234
251
98 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

46
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Neocon side, it might be the fascination with gadgetry

and new technology, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said, and on

the liberal side it might be the idea that we're doing

this for your own good.

And we've all heard that before.

The government is here, right?

The fact of the matter is, when you start

thinking about mind control technologies as a concept,

the idea that someone believes that they can interfere

with your free will, this is something that most

10

religions in the world say God won't even do.

11

think this is their appropriate direction in technology,

12

to interfere with the way consciousness flows.

13

Yet, men

Now, think about for a moment what are the

14

things that -- what is the easiest way to manipulate

15

consciousness?

16

Create an environment of anxiety and fear.

17

happens at that point is you cannot reach your higher

18

states of consciousness.

19

The easiest way, the simplest way.


Because what

If you look at Monroe, rhythmic patterns in the

20

Hemi-Sync as an example, higher states of consciousness

21

are associated with those rhythmic patterns within the

22

brain; not that incoherent scattering of death and

23

information and energy.

24
25

So if you create a certain environment of fear


and anxiety and you look at an EEG monitor and the brain

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page
Page261
234
235
252
99 of
of183
173
318
319
356
365

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

47
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

activity of an individual, you see it's kind of

scattered in patterns.

higher emotions; love, compassion.

rhythmic patterns.

One person is experiencing


You begin to see

Another simple way of seeing is something that

you can actually measure.

Take two people that are in

love and they -- you know the saying, and I looked into

her eyes, right?

another individual and hold that gaze, you'll begin to

If you actually gaze into the eyes of

10

mirror each other's brain activity in a pretty unique

11

way.

12

long enough.

Two people's breathing begins to

13

synchronize.

Their energy fields begin to synchronize.

Your breathing will even synchronize if you do it

14

And at the same time, their awareness, their

15

intuitions elevate and their rhythmic patterns in the

16

brain can be seen.

17

fear -- think about the advertising you see on

18

television.

19

breath is, you know?

20

uncomfortable.

21

If you can create an environment of

It's all about how you smell, how your


It's all these things to make you

Think about the 6:00 news.

Now, we heard

22

someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that kind of

23

works.

24

people sit down in front of the television set.

25

already fatigued.

You come home from a hard day at work.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Most
They're

They begin to watch the television.

Page 262
100 of 365
235
236
253
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

48
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

And then their spouse hollers, it's time for dinner;

it's time for dinner.

right?

they're in a light trance-like state.

How many of you've been there,

Nobody's listening.

No one's hearing.

Because

Now, if you look in a dark room -- the

television is here -- look behind you at the white wall

and look at the flicker rate.

coherent signal within a certain range through the optic

nerves, your brain will lock onto that signal.

If that flicker rate is a

If you

10

monitor the brain activity at that time, you'll drop

11

into this highly-suggestive state and now you listen to

12

the advertising.

13

Now, every school of psychology teaches

14

frequency following response today and that you can

15

create these kinds of effects.

16

advertising?

17

advertising works so well.

18

convincing and compelling.

19

Would they apply in

Of course they would.

That's why

It works because it's

When you look at the 6:00 news, would somebody

20

utilize that in broadcasting the news of the latest

21

propaganda from whatever source it's coming from?

22

would speculate -- today I would speculate and say yes.

23

When you think about how simple it is to create

24

that agitation.

25

University who published a paper in 1995 talking about

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

There was a person at Valencia

Page 263
101 of 365
236
237
254
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

49
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

this whole concept.

could create a complex signal, broadcast it out over a

large area that just created the sense that something's

not right.

And what he said back then was you

Unease.

And then you go watch the 6:00 news and they

indict some specific ethnic group, maybe it's Muslims,

and then a certain amount of that anger gets diverted

that way.

decided on the laser edge of populations, on majorities,

Well, in a day where a lot of things are

10

this is a very, very powerful tool and one quite simple

11

tool to apply in the modern world.

12

When you think about news feeds today, how much

13

is really investigative reporting and how much of it is

14

just spitting out somebody's press release, right?

15

little investigative reporting today because it's

16

expensive, because it's not immediate, and when you look

17

at the news media today, it's almost immediate and most

18

of it is just meant to entertain.

19

inform.

20

Very

It's not meant to

You know, freedom of the press, it used to have

21

something to do with keeping an informed public so we

22

could make good decisions and we could govern as a

23

public.

24

Say whatever you want, say it however you want, but

25

nobody takes responsibility and we have the neutered

Today we debate the media as freedom of speech.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 264
102 of 365
237
238
255
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

50
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

neutral news.

come on.

And if you really believe it's neutral,

Everybody who assigns a story to a reporter

knows that reporter's biased.

It comes out in the news and what gets published and

what doesn't.

the news?

up.

But no one has really taken it on as a topic and

10
11

The editors have bias.

How many stories about mind control hit

Occasionally.

The economists might pick it

Somebody might pick up a little bit, a piece of it.

consistently pursued it.


Yet, when you think about modern technology and

12

the resolution -- now, we've been talking about things

13

that have happened in the past, and somebody even

14

mentioned this, MK-ULTRA is a program -- you've heard it

15

alluded to.

16

subprojects under it.

17

That was the CIA's program.

It had 144

Most of the records surrounding that were

18

shredded by a guy named Gottlieb, who was responsible

19

for that at the Central Intelligence Agency during the

20

Church Committee hearings.

21

truth back then.

22

this, has become increasingly refined as our technology

23

has advanced.

24
25

We never really got the

But the resolution, the ability to do

When you think about technological advances,


one of the things I read says that technology from the

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 265
103 of 365
238
239
256
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

51
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

invention of the wheel to where we are today, it doubles

about every nine to ten months.

Invention of the wheel to where we are today, ten months

from now we're going to double that, and then we're

going to keep doing that.

Wow.

Think about it.

It used to be every five years in the 1980s,

and it kept shrinking as our computing power increased

and our ability to manipulate large amounts of data

increased.

10

Now, a super computer, think about a super

11

computer.

12

was doing this work, about 280 teraflops a second, which

13

at that time would be like six billion people on the

14

planet with hand calculators doing a calculation every

15

60 seconds for 60 hours to do what that super computer

16

could do in a second.

17

A super computer will do somewhere, when I

Well, the next evolution -- some think it's

18

already here -- are the quantum computers.

19

the quantum computer do?

20

will do what a super computer does in a trillion years.

21

It's back to this analogy of how much EMF do we have out

22

there.

23

What will

A quantum computer in one hour

Well, think about the same kind of

24

amplification and computing power.

25

as a concept.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

You look at privacy

It doesn't exist in the world today,

Page 266
104 of 365
239
240
257
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

52
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

right?

tracked, whether it's your GPS on your phone, whether

it's your phone conversations -- in the United States,

every piece of mail is photographed for who it went to

and who sent it.

Virtually everything about us is catalogued,

When you think about your telecommunications,

your Internet connections, Google, AT&T, Verizon, all of

them have violated the very essence of what personal

privacy is all about.

10

Because today, in the 21st Century, we need a

11

revolution, an evolution of what privacy is all about.

12

Because you, experiencing the victimization of this

13

technology, are the pinnacle of the abuse.

14

is subject to abuse of personal privacy.

15

But everyone

You used to think about it, it would start and

16

end in our physical doorway in our home.

17

in your home compared to what is in data banks stored on

18

every single human being in this room.

19

It has nothing

Now, people say, oh, don't worry about it.

20

don't have the ability to collect.

21

resolution to look into it.

22

that resolution.

23

computing first will be able to hack through every

24

security code for every system on the planet within

25

hours.

We

We don't have the

Quantum computers will give

Whichever government finds quantum

They'll be able to predict with so much accuracy

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 267
105 of 365
240
241
258
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

53
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

by collecting all that data and analyzing that data, it

will almost seem a spiritual event.

But it will only be accurate up to a certain

point.

And over time that flaw will amplify to where it's big

flaws.

guide our world, to guide our ideas, our philosophy, and

how we pursue the world.

And then there will be a little bit of a flaw.

But we'll rely increasingly on these systems to

The Internet.

What people think about that is

10

the world wide mind of the 21st Century.

11

Public Broadcasting System, did a special called "The

12

World Wide Mind".

13

I say within 20 years or even now -- maybe it already

14

exists now -- but within 20 years that you'll be able to

15

connect the physical minds of all of the people on the

16

planet in a world wide mind.

17

PBS, our

And they say within 100 years -- and

Now, that might appeal to some.

It doesn't

18

really appeal to me from the standpoint of technology.

19

I think we already have that on a certain level.

20

think we already are connected on a certain level.

21

belief systems limit our ability to access that level,

22

but I believe it's here.

23

I
Our

And I've seen enough demonstrations of it.

You

24

know, all those scientists I had in that room for that

25

mind effects conference, the part that really blew me

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 268
106 of 365
241
242
259
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

54
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

away that I didn't expect was what they really centered

on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun

and physicist, and she said that the next leap is going

to be the leap where we realize or we recognize or we

remember our extrasensory perceptions, our anonymous

capabilities as human beings and that becomes the next

evolution of the human kind.

8
9

And what suppresses that is fear and anxiety,


because you cannot reach those cases of consciousness as

10

long as you're in fear and anxiety.

And anyone who

11

purports or is a victim of these technologies, do you

12

have anxiety, do you have fear?

13

you have the ability to reach those higher states of

14

consciousness in that condition?

15

not possible.

Of course you do.

Do

It's physiologically

16

So when you think about entire populations,

17

whether it's religion injecting fear or whether it's

18

government injecting fear or as my friend used to say,

19

you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps

20

you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you think

21

about how things evolved in Europe several hundred years

22

ago.

23

When you think about modern technology on the

24

backdrop of that concept, what's changed?

25

changed.

It's just the same deal.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 269
107 of 365
242
243
260
173
183
318
319
356

Nothing's

You know, 6,000 wars

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

55
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

in 4,000 years, most of them over religion; let me give

you a clue, God doesn't need any help killing anybody.

God can probably do it himself or herself.

The fact of the matter is, the idea that people

would just be evil on -- and I think I heard earlier

today that the psychopaths are in the minority.

believe they are.

people, they're out there, but they're not this mass.

Most people do things because they believe they're

I think really evil-to-the-core

10

right, and then they want to impose their rightness on

11

other people.

12

And this is kind of a mistake and then we end

13

up in this conflict between ideas without being fair and

14

recognizing people's right to disagree.

15

said earlier, certain things you can't say in Germany.

16

Certain things you can't say in a movie theater, too.

17

You know, you can't yell fire.

18

sense.

19

And I heard it

Now, it makes good

You don't want to yell fire in a movie theater.


Some would say what we're doing here is yelling

20

fire in a movie theater because we're letting people

21

know what we know, what we've concluded from a good deal

22

of research.

23

You know, my books are written, every page at

24

the bottom of each page are the footnotes.

25

find that distracting.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Some of you

Personally, I want to know where

Page 270
108 of 365
243
244
261
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

56
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

the information came from as I'm reading it, not a week

later as I'm contemplating it.

source.

I want to know the

And so in the publications that I've written,

1600 source documents, reviews out of a matrix of a

hundred thousand that we had available to us, more or

less.

have made it into four books on technology dealing with

mind effects, dealing with HAARP, dealing with personal

20,000 have made it into my archives and 1600

10

privacy issues.

11

the last four years.

12

A lot of the things go unreleased in

You can look at my publications from 1999 and

13

2000, and you'll see the same things, because the old

14

literature showed enough to come to those conclusions.

15

When I testified in the European Parliament in

16

the '90s, at their invitation -- and this was another --

17

a good side story for technology.

18

name of Thomas Spencer, he was from the UK, he was a

19

Parliamentarian at the time, and he was the Chairman of

20

the Environmental Subcommittee of the European

21

Parliament.

22

given him the book on HAARP and he was very interested

23

in this.

24

I flew to Brussels and spent a few days with him talking

25

about the issue and brought with me a couple feet of

A gentleman by the

And he had contacted me.

So we had a conversation.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 271
109 of 365
244
245
262
173
183
318
319
356

Somebody had

And at my expense,

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

57
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

unclassified documents for his research team to take a

look at.

What happened then is he moved in the European

Parliament -- he was a Conservative, by the way, and he

moved into a Foreign Affairs Chairman, a very powerful

position, an ideal position for dealing with the things

that we were dealing with at the time.

8
9

So we -- at his invitation, I came over to


testify in front of the group on security and

10

disarmament in the European Parliament on HAARP and on

11

non-lethal weapons, the kinds of things we've been

12

talking about today, the manipulation of human beings.

13

Now, they do it a lot differently than we do it

14

in the US.

In the US, when you have public hearings,

15

the public actually gets to come.

16

Parliament, the public meeting is you have to have an

17

invitation to come.

18

know, I hadn't really thought much about that.

In the European

So that's kind of different.

You

19

And they also -- they can also do things behind

20

closed doors, which, you know, we theoretically can't do

21

in the United States.

22

the public invited or the media invited.

23

You can't have a meeting without

So what happened the night before the hearing

24

is the Committee met with myself, one of the other

25

people testifying, and a member of the press and we

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 272
110 of 365
245
246
263
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

58
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

spent five and a half hours in a non-official meeting to

talk about these issues, so that when we actually gave

our testimony the following day, they would have

formulated a set of questions to give us the opportunity

to follow along.

because then they at least had a good base of knowledge.

So it was a great way to do it,

Now, in that private meeting we demonstrated a

technology using infrasound where you could transfer

sound through electrodes attached to the skin where you

10

would perceive that proverbial voice in the head.

11

demonstrated that to the Parliamentarians in that closed

12

session.

13

We

And then we went into the hearing the following

14

day.

15

her, testifying on our side.

16

the gentleman's name, but he was from a group called

17

GRIP in Brussels that does research on weapon systems

18

particularly and he had done his Master's thesis on

19

HAARP, and so he was there.

20

And it was Rosalie Bertell, which is where I met


It was -- I can't remember

We had someone from the International Red Cross

21

that had done work on non-lethal weapons and was a

22

specialist in this particular area.

23

there.

24
25

And then I was

We each got 15 minutes to present.

And then I

got an hour of questions from the committee in the open

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 273
111 of 365
246
247
264
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

59
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

hearing where I had the opportunity to talk about some

of these things.

been this incident in Japan where children watching a

cartoon that had a certain flicker rate had caused over

700 children to go to the hospital with epileptic

seizures.

a problem, right?

to go into the hospital.

And right around that time there had

Now, remember, non-ionizing radiation is not


A flicker of the TV caused 700 kids

Now, some say that was by design.

Some say

10

that was by accident.

11

for talking about non-ionizing radiation in the European

12

Parliament because they had all read that story.

13

fresh.

14

But it was a perfect illustration

It was

The other thing demonstrating infrasound,

15

something that had never been demonstrated, to my

16

knowledge, in that type of a meeting, to show that you

17

could actually transfer sound without necessarily

18

involving the ears.

19

Now, there's another technology that was

20

advanced by a guy named Woody Norris -- he won the

21

Lemelson Prize at MIT for this particular technology,

22

and I believe the year was 2004.

23

Norris -- and his was using acoustic heterodyne where he

24

could send in two signals from two different sources,

25

point them at an individual in the crowd, and they would

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 274
112 of 365
247
248
265
173
183
318
319
356

You can look up Woody

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

60
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

hear this voice in their head and nobody else would hear

it.

Well, he won a half a million dollars for that

prize, organized a company called ATCO.

them up.

technology to the military for perimeter protection.

You know, where they could have these sort of alarm

systems so when the protestors got too close they'd hear

these warning signs that nobody else was hearing.

10

They're a public company.

You can look

And he sold that

Now, you think about that for a moment.

11

Imagine -- this is why the European Parliament got

12

interested, because we used this illustration.

13

imagine a national leader standing up in front of a

14

group and all of a sudden they hear voices in their head

15

that nobody else hears.

16

right?

17

what that technology can do.

18

demonstration.

19

Now,

That's the end of that guy,

I mean, he's out of there.

And that's exactly

And that was one

Now, some have said that you can pulse modulate

20

on a single beam and create the same effect or utilize

21

something like HAARP, not so much for voice in the head,

22

but for certainly changing emotional state of large

23

segments of the population.

24
25

When we looked at all of this, we even looked


back -- you know, where else could this have been used?

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 275
113 of 365
248
249
266
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

61
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

And there was a device in Vietnam called the Lida

machine, L-i-d-a.

named Ross Adey, who is, unfortunately, also deceased.

Ross Adey was brilliant and was utilized by the

government, by private sector as an expert in these

kinds of areas.

A guy who researched this was a guy

Well, he was asked to look at -- this

particular device had been captured during the Vietnam

War.

It was a Russian device.

And it created the

10

entrainment effect using flickering light and sound.

11

And they used it for interrogating prisoners by putting

12

them into that, like, trance-like state and then

13

extracting intelligence from them.

14

1960s.

15

Now, that's the

Again, this is low resolution, low technology.


As computing powers increased, as our knowledge

16

in human physiology has increased, as our knowledge of

17

the electromagnetic nature of human beings has

18

increased, the ability to manipulate large segments of

19

the population comes easily achieved, either as a side

20

effect or unfortunate disaster of our technology.

21

You mentioned Swiss Re, Swiss Re Insurance.

22

Swiss Re Insurance wrote a paper on Electrosmog.

23

believe it was 2002.

24

industry then, don't insure electromagnetic field

25

effects because it will result in a bigger lawsuit than

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

And they said to the insurance

Page 276
114 of 365
249
250
267
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

62
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

Firestone on their tires or the smoking industry,

because the knowledge is here and now and nobody insures

that risk.

Lloyd's of London insures anything, but they

won't insure that risk.

Nobody does.

Because insurance

companies don't like to lose money.

that.

before cell phones were invented, the University of

Washington had investigated those very same frequencies

It's as simple as

And yet the telecom industry on cell phones --

10

on chick embryo studies and determined they were

11

harmful.

12

Cell phones didn't exist then.


Then cell phones come out and everything's safe

13

all of a sudden.

14

says, now, wait a minute, we did all this research.

15

This is a dangerous thing.

16

a powerful adversary.

17

That same guy that did that research

So it went to the Congress.

18

There was a guy in Florida.

19

controversy.

20

said, we need a study.

21

pay for the study.

22

study.

23

But the telecom industry is

You remember this.

Brain cancer.

It ended up in the Congress.

Big
Congress

So the industry says, oh, we'll

They spend 25 million dollars on the

I can't remember the guy's name who did it, but

24

he eventually published a book because his findings

25

were, hey, this is dangerous.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 277
115 of 365
250
251
268
173
183
318
319
356

All right.

He issues his

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

63
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

report.

they got the 25 million into his queue.

it all on these projects.

himself.

5
6

They figured, hey, they got him.

You know,
He got to spend

He got to make some money

Hey, he's our man.


Well, he wasn't.

This guy actually had some

integrity, and I apologize for not recalling his name.

A VOICE:

DR. BEGICH:

A VOICE:

10

George Carlo.
Which one is it?

George Carlo.

DR. BEGICH:

George Carlo, that's correct.

And

11

he wrote a book called, "Cell Phones", a very important

12

book.

13

And when it comes to children, one of his

14

observations was -- he had the simple observation of

15

damage to skulls.

16

five-year-old, 400 percent more energy transfers to the

17

skull into the brain than an adult.

18

twelve-year-old, approximately 200 percent.

19

You know, you have a four-year-old, a

Ten-year-old,

This is one of the main reasons why you don't

20

want children using cell phones or, even worse, the

21

portable phone in the home because it's even less

22

efficient with the battery and the energy with even more

23

leakage.

24

phone today where you actually pick it up and talk into

25

it.

And what do we do?

Try and find a hard line

You can't even find them anymore.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 278
116 of 365
251
252
269
173
183
318
319
356

They're almost

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

64
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

impossible to find.

When you look at what we have learned about

human physiology and the effects of electromagnetic

fields on the human physiology, it is the revolution in

science that will collapse the pharmacuetical industry

one day.

recognize that the pea in the soup of electromagnetic

radiation has been the cause and the root to most of the

chronic disease we see on the planet today.

10

And one day we're going to wake up and

When you combine that with that concept that I

11

used, that example of iodine, everyone has a little bit,

12

now you have these complex interactions, 5,000 new

13

chemicals are introduced or compounds introduced to the

14

public every year without really any serious studies,

15

and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a

16

very toxic world.

17

manipulation from the propaganda of World War II to the

18

downloading of that.

19

achieve?

20

personnel with a download.

Blap.

21

years' worth of education.

Now, let's go on.

22

And then you take the technology of

What does the military hope to

They want to be able to train military

And now here's the thing.

23

kind of education.

24

programming.

25

thinking involved.

There's your 12

Think about that

No critical thinking involved.

It's like writing to a disk.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Who controls that?

Page 279
117 of 365
252
253
270
173
183
318
319
356

Just

No critical

Curriculum

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

65
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

controls the way in which our society goes.

risk.

This is the

What about evidence in courtrooms when you can

create a synthetic memory or wipe one out?

that do to a Democratic Republic or a Democracy where

people have the power?

us as we become increasingly transparent to governmental

agencies and they become increasingly opaque.

What does

That power has been taken from

It is the opposite of what should be occurring.

10

There shouldn't be a camera in every household.

11

should be a camera in every government office.

12

the technology's there.

13

and look at what our employees are doing, right?

14

Wouldn't you like to be able to dial up your

15

Congressional office and see that conversation they're

16

having in real time?

17

that?

18

There
Because

We should be able to dial in

And why shouldn't we be able to do

What do they have to hide?


You know, you think about government and you

19

start saying that and, you know, the only people

20

protected from that kind of intrusion in the US are

21

federal employees.

22

protection than the average citizen within the country

23

that I live in.

24
25

They have a higher level of

For what?

And when you think about government, everyone


points to the politician.

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

I can tell you, most

Page 280
118 of 365
253
254
271
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

66
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

politicians are ignorant.

parties in the United States the preference is to have

people that are -- they look like the news announcer,

but they couldn't think their way out of a phone booth,

right?

they couldn't think their way out of one.

want people that are smart enough to look good, but not

smart enough to think on their own.

politician for political parties, because they can be

10

In fact, most political

We don't even have a phone booth anymore, but


Because they

That's the ideal

told what to do.

11

Look at how much money is being spent in

12

political outcomes.

13

have pointed and looked at, like, Australia to mandatory

14

voting.

15

Huge amounts of money.

Some people

Everybody votes now.


Worst possible thing that you could ever do.

16

And here's why:

17

pulls the lever?

18

maybe 20 percent of the population votes, but at least

19

they're informed.

20

When the population doesn't vote, who


Those that are informed, right?

So

They've educated themselves.

If you force people to vote to keep their

21

driver's license, their medical benefits, or whatever

22

social programs you've got running and you say, you will

23

vote, now who decides what they vote on?

24

buy the 30-second or one-minute ad on TV that influences

25

them.

Whoever can

The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 281
119 of 365
254
255
272
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

67
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

and pull the lever.

A very dangerous situation.

Now we have a dangerous situation.

Democracy is something that each of us have to

claim internally.

The change that people are looking

for in this group happens by a change in consciousness,

by us recognizing what we are as human beings,

recognizing the potential that we have.

know what these government programs yielded?

points to the fear side of the equation.

Because you
Everybody

But what they

10

really discovered was that every single soul, every

11

human being has this anomalous capability.

12

Now, imagine if we could awaken those

13

capabilities, could you hide anything?

14

people could literally look into the mind of another

15

person, that makes a politician pretty vulnerable,

16

wouldn't it?

17

I mean, if

That is the next evolution that I believe is

18

happening and it's the only evolution, the only

19

revolution that can change the way things are.

20

starts with human consciousness.

21

believe to be right and true and beginning to act on it.

22

Not from a foundation of fear, but a foundation of

23

confidence.

24
25

It

It starts with what we

You know, somebody asked me once, what do you


think about faith?

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

I said, faith is what you know to be

Page 282
120 of 365
255
256
273
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

68
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

right and true and you step into it on the idea that you

can achieve it.

You believe it.

So many people I've seen in this work, they

keep jumping into things beyond their belief.

don't believe they can achieve it.

and they fail, and they keep failing.

are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can

do with confidence, do what you can do with knowledge,

don't wait for a group to form.

They try it anyway


And people who

The group's already

10

here.

It's called the human race.

11

to be right and true.

12

up, learn from it, and move forward.

13

They

Act on what you know

If you make a mistake, clean it

When you look across this room and you look at

14

all these folks with a little bit of gray hair, and

15

you've got the gray hair not by all of those great

16

things that happened in your life, but by the real

17

disasters that happened in your life.

18

think about bad news is a stimulation for good news.

19

You know, you

People ask me, you know your father's

20

disappearance, disappeared off the face of the earth,

21

that must have been a horrible thing.

22

the time.

23

life because it altered my course.

24
25

Yeah, it was at

I consider it the most important event in my

The worst things in our lives alter our course,


change our direction, activate that higher potential

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 283
121 of 365
256
257
274
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

69
Published by the Advanced
Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
1

that cause us to rise out of the ashes of our apathy and

our defeats and stand on our feet again and move

forward.

The pain that people experience today is the

catalyst for the solutions tomorrow, whether we like it

or not, whether it's falling down as a two-year-old or

standing up as an adult.

our ethics, on the basis of our values, and we

reinvigorate and let go of the fear and recognize what

If we stand up on the basis of

10

we are as creative beings, we have the potential to make

11

change.

12

And with that, I'll open it to questions.

13

(Applause.)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ of Habeus Corpus

Page 284
122 of 365
257
258
275
173
183
318
319
356

Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
18
7
11of
1of
of
1of
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
51
51
51
Page
123
258
259
276
285
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"# $

%" "&##'(

#$

" "
*

#)
/ * .

.
/-

.
*

! #!" ! !
+

- / * )
0
) . ) 0

3
-

. /
-

9::;
0

)
)
*

% &!

'
,

)
0 )
*
- 0
0 . - 0
.
0

0 ) .
' -

* .

0
/

/+

1 ,
-

/
*

. /
5678
9::;
/ .1 0

0 )
/
)

/-

) -

* +

#-

!"
)

'

'

! # (
)

<

,,

!
344///

2
4

,!

6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
7, , *
,
- ,
/ *
* 3

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
29
8
22
1of
2of
of
2of
1
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
50
51
51
51
Page
124
259
260
277
286
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
12
39
33
2of
3of
of
3of
of
51
172
of
51
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
125
260
261
278
287
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"
%

"

/
4 4 2 1

12! 1 3
!

"
'

"

& %
) '
$
!
)

($
!&

#
%

.
&"

&
+,
#

$
'
"

$ %"
+,

'

"%

$
$%
$%

)
)

"

"%

"
%&

)
#

"

&

'

$ ($ "
%
"
"& %

) "
""

"

%%

# & & &

) "

$
$
$ % )
$

#'

% )

&

% '"

&

"
$

"%

%%

'$

"

" !
+ % /

0$

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
11
13
444
3of
4of
of
4of
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
126
261
262
279
288
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

8 *

- =8 *

<

*+ ;

<

)=

@, #-

) .-

) . #

<
0

A,#-

) - - 0
0

.& !
#

5697 > - )
0
0
4
0
-

)
0
0

/ .C

0)

0
.

?)

0 .

? 0
-

.>
- 0
0
.

#-

- ) -

.
- 0

)
-

.
.

.
) -

3
.

<

/
0

)
/
00

/ )

0
-

) 0
)
- - )
2

.
-

0
0

)
0

+ ,
-

. .
0

.?
)
?- 0

$ 8 *
9
: *
0
/ )
0
/- 0 *
/ )
) )
)
)0
) .
4
* .
0
0
0
+D 5 :::,
0
0
)
) /
0
+ , /2
))
. .
0
0
0
)
)

#- "
-

) -

) - <
- B 0

/* .
-

/ -

. .
#
- <

.-

0
) -

.
.

/
- .- .

.
.- 0

" .

) )-

(
)

.-

0
0
-

*+ ;

9,
?
-

)
-

5, #)
-

#0
. >>>

&

*
-

/ .
0

/ )
4
. 0

)
E

EE

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
12
14
555
4of
5of
of
5of
2
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
127
262
263
280
289
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
B

) ?
- /
/ - 0

) .- 0
/ - )

)
0
)
0
/ - ) - -

)
.
. )?

#-

. )?

) -

00
) - -

)
0 * . -

0
)
/) 0

. -

/ -

) -

) 0
- )

/
) -

)
)

/
)

? 0
00

)
)

? 0

0?
0

00

?
-

) F 0

0
-

#-

.
/ - 0
) .
)
00
) 0

)
-

- ? !

. -

/ -

00

00

? 00

?
) F0 *

/00
. .
0 0
) - .
-

0
)

- -

00

/- 00

.
-

0
8
+ , !
0

F0

00

) 0
.
-

0
)

/- -

/- ))
/-

/ / -

0
-

F0

0
.
-

.
)
F

.
.

*
/ -

0 *

) 0
-

.
-

0 /- - /
0
0
*
)
0
)
) F
) - ) /
)
)
0
)

? 0

/ -

.
-

)
)

)
) -

? 0

) /- -

?!

.
.

) 0

00

)
)

.
0

5:
) )

.
)

,
/- / )

0
-

? 00
) 0
))
/ /- / -

2
/
.
/- -

2
.
0

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
13
15
666
5of
6of
of
6of
3
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
128
263
264
281
290
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
+ , !
0

/00

)
/-

)
0

0
.

- .
)

) / *
.
+D 5 :::,
)
0
0
0
.
0
F C

+5, #0

0 *
00
/ *
. 0
5: 0
0 * . 0
- / *
) 0
.
. . 0
-

+ ,

+), )

+., B
0
-

) -

0
B

)
0

/-

)
+D5: :::,
) )

0
))
0
/

0 -

0
-

/ .

0
-

)
)
0

/-

)
-

0
-

00
0

00
)
-

/00

. / -

0 *
+ , + ,

0 ?

/-

00

?
) F 0

+/ ) .
4
/ - 4
)
/
-

* .

*+ /
0

00
-

0
. /
. 0
0
.
0 .
0
F 0
/ ) 3
+! B,
.
, .
* /
.
)
.
2
1
0 . .
.
+
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
13
14
16
777
6of
7of
of
7of
4
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
129
264
265
282
291
173
183
318
319
356
365
+

. 00

0 *
/- )
0
0
/ - /- 0 .
. . 0

2
. -

+ ,

)
0

/ - 9A=-

0
0

0 *
0
-

+ , + ,
3
.
. -

+ ,

+9, #-

00

.
))

/
0
00

/ - -

0
0
- .
- #-

) -

+ ,
))
00
/-

0 0 * . -

0 *

00
)
0
0
)

0 *
-

/)

/ )

!
0

0 *

0
/ ) 3
+< B,
0
)
.
)
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
0

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
0

=
0
.

. 0

0
-

.
-

/ =
0 .

)
)

=
1

=
-

)
F

0
. - 0

.
0
.

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
14
15
17
888
7of
8of
of
8of
5
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
130
265
266
283
292
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

!
"

#
$
& #

'

"
"

# )

* ()+

"
,
/

."

1
!

#
%

3
"

)
. #

#
"

#
5%1%

%4

"

%/

"
-

%
#

,
0

%2

""

%4
"

"'

#
"

!"

"
0

!
()

6
&

%9
#

-4,

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

0
:

'

"
"

%
#

'

" #

"

"
%
# #

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
15
16
18
999
8of
9of
of
9of
8
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
Page
131
266
267
284
293
173
183
318
319
356
365

()

# %

"

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

.'
'

%
#
#

"

"
"

()

%'
;

"

%
<=
#

"
"

5%1%

9
"

"
!
@

()

"

"

%
(
(

!;

.
!
# %

,
-1

.
511

"

""

"
1

()
#

"

,
(

A 1

"
%

"

"
%

"

#
.

%
,

"

4
%-

.
%'

$
#

4
)

;
#

#
-4 ,

>?

#
5%1%
"
%B

"

#
5%1%

%
4

#
#

@
#

"

"

C%%

%.

)
"

'

-:

% -@ ;

%'

.)
"

%@
%4,

"

"

%.

D $
2

!
) $&

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

C%
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
16
17
19
10
10
910
10
of
of
9of
51
172
173
174
176
50
of
51
51
51
51
Page
132
267
268
285
294
of
173
183
318
319
356
365

E
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

!
)

"

& '(

*
+ &$ #
*

$'' ,&
./0 1/.2

" #

3
$*

) $

0
0

&
"$
)

**

! 34
0
3 "
0
# &
*
" "
"
& $
5 " )
&
'
$
)
# 3
$
"
.678
0
'
" "
)
&
) '
&
" '
$*0 3
0
& '
0
& '
) $
' &
$&
'
9$*
"
:
0 &0
' ;,
&
,
<
"
) $
,0
' =. >
"
'
"#
&
$
) 1/.2
& '
#
&
$
&
)
,#
&
24.;9&#9/12269
)
?
$
*$
) 3
&
3 '
!
&
)
!
&$
$
)
.29<;//
#& '

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
17
18
20
11
10
11
11
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
133
268
269
286
295
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
111
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

!
'

" #$ $ %
)'

%)

&
%

*++

!
"
#

"

"

&

'
)' +
"# - /

*
2
5 #$ '
(922

(34
( 6
2

(
0

(
8 ' (

69

(
(

!
%
'

',%
/0

2'

" !
( )%
"

'

#%

'
'

,
%

2
*

'
+

0
(

'

, - .$

%
*

"
-

"% .

"## $"

%&

&
)
.

%
-

%' ( )*+*

+. *+ /

0! ) * . *++
0! ) . *++

0$
&
2
$

1
$

!%
!%$

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
18
19
21
12
11
12
12
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
134
269
270
287
296
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
212
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

)( )*+,
)*+,
.

"%-

"

"

% )

)4
"

.
.

*+ /
3

"
3

$ -

/ 1
-" $%

1-"%

/#

"

5"%"

#' .

"&

5"

" $ $"& /

5"%"

5!
3
!

!%$

.
!

-""

).
)?

-""

#$ $

! !

5/# 4
5" ! #" /#

#"

)*+6

%!

# %
9!

"$'
%#"

4 -"9 %" 5"

%" 5%"" ?3@ A "# /

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

# 5

4%

5/%&

" / /

$9

/%! /

!" !"

5/%&

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
13
19
20
22
13
12
13
13
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
135
270
271
288
297
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
313
of
41

= 5

-"

& ! 10" / $

&"9/!/" !' 4/ 5 &/%"!

&

&"

&$"

4 #
"4

# $$"# "&

% 01"

5"

& !

9 <

5"

! %"

/# %/!

5" ! #"

4 - #"&

/#!

5" %' 4 # 9/ "&

&

2 4"."%

5" )*+6 2 -" #

5"

1/! #

1/! # 4 # 9/ "&
%/

+67*),,8 /

9 "% 9/ / $

1"&

; %/#&/! /

% #"!

) 1

) '

" 4 #

1-"%

5"

"0 % 1"

5 4 9 1/ '

; "

) 1

0$

/!5" "
9

5)

!
)

"%-

4 % / $

+88+

! !

"

9 !

1 %&"% /

"!

10 /$

<

& 5" ! #" 4 # #


%

7$

/# %/!

"## ! %% - %

/!"

& 4 # 0%"#/&/ $ #/ !" / :# 9/ / $ /


"&

-'

# "%

"./&" !"

3 ;

" / /

9 % 5"

" )3 )*+,
%0 #

0$

&

"

A!

"

""9

"% 2 ! / $

%
!

.
)

) " *+ /.

'$

<

5!

0$

"

.
!

10

' %

" <

<(> (

<

)
3

""

"

<

"

"

%! ) !

0$

"

*+ +

.!

!%$

& )

.
"

!
3

35

) !

36**

!%

)'

35

*+ + ) '

"

"

4/

"

"&/

&

6 !

!"&

"

&.

4 )

% )

&

" .

"

5"

" &
5 !

/1

00"

/%! / 1 ' %

"

/#

/!5" "

#
5"

10" "%
9 %

"

-" 9/ "& -' 5"


#

#"

B 45" 5"%

+,>
9%""

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
/#

/!5" "

1-"%

% $%

&$1"

5"% 5"% 2 -" #

"%-

)4 )

"
!

"/

0! )

!
%

<

!
!

"

5#

"

4 )
)

& 9"&"%

$ -

"

! !

B. *+ /

"

! ! .

C!

"

0$

) 5
!%

% #

"

11 %'

"

<

"

$%

0$
%

"

"

.4

3 5

%
)

#/

. *+ /. '

% $% 1 -

1"

0$
%

! /

& 45" 5"%

5
%"

!/./

%0 #

"

<

" 4 )

"

"

EB++$++$

0! )

. *+ /

-""

. -""
"

!%.

!
%

"
! !

. *+ /

"

<
<

) 4
&

<

*/+

)
4

"

<

) '

<

"

(
.

> $

C!

/9+B

/$

%%

. &'

! $

"

"

"

0 ""

"

<

C!
/B .

) 0!
%

!%

*B. *+ /
.

"

#$ $ 4

%!

*+ /

"

"

0$

)9 9

! C

$
@

3 .

0$

!
3

"

4$

!
!

!%%
)%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

"

"

! "

! !

35

"

'

"

.
4

"

"

)
$

F+* %

* !

' %

"

)
)

8%

<

0!

!%%
0$

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
14
20
21
23
14
13
14
14
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
136
271
272
289
298
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
414
of
41

& @
)

).

!
)%

'$

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
%

" *+ /

%
B$

0$

"

/&"

4$

"

'$ 4

. '$ $. "

"

4$

% !

)"

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

#$ $

0$

"

>

! )
)$

. 0 $.

!
%

"

(=5->( "

) "

) D/

.
"

%
"

"

4$

B+? $

"

> 6
3

4$

%%
"

0! ) *+. *++

"

"

3 )

+?

%
%

4$

"6

/!

)
!

"

.
!

0$

4
3

) "
%

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
15
21
22
24
15
14
15
15
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
137
272
273
290
299
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
515
of
41

&

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

2
0$

%!

""
F

"

1!

)
1

""

! $

"

$.

&1. <
.

! )

!
$

9
"

"

5"

1!

""

"

"

.
3

.&

"
7

/
"

)
%

&"%

&

"

"

)H

"

"

8 ** )
"

%
+? $ -

%
%!

$&

). %

0$

"

C "%%

'-'

"%/
7

%!

5/%& ?3%&@ %$"# "10


/.+++
% )
$
1"#

"

>

).

).

0$

8%

)H

9!%

!
%

>

*F.

)
%

0!

" ' "

6!

"

$.

'

"

"

0$

) .

!%

"

"

"

" !

%!

! )

)$

!%. <

' %

&

3 !

"

0$
** )

"!

G0

""

"

? "

>

$
"

%!

'"%

" <

. 4

&
! ) "<

.4
F

$
9

"

*$

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
16
22
23
25
16
15
16
16
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
138
273
274
291
300
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
616
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
"
" %$" 2 D
)

"#. "
) "' "

-"%

--'

'

%!
""
#$ $ 4

'

,
'

"

"

" '
)

&"% 2 /$. "


'
J

"

. "

'

&

#$ $

&". "

#"05
!
%% %

%
.

. "

!
"E

"
#5. "
$

"

"

.
7

6 !

>

=
)

"

" = %

"
"

$
%

%& " C
"
!
!

-""

5
!

%& "
!
#$ $

& # %/"#.

!
!

&

$
"

"

#$ $

$
%

F
E

"

" 1
"

"

"4#C /

!/

/1"#
G

"

%
%

>

@ %%

"

"

"4# )*C)*
6!

)
! ) .

G
)

"

A$

""
"

'

!
"
"

4
)

1! "
!

.
)

$
-

0! )

*
) 0

"
% =
H
! )

"

0$
!
5
!

" <

3.
"!

&1. < $.
"
0$
?

$.

$ 0
!

K
%

$
%

"%/

<

) 0
!

% .
1!
<

9
+9++ D <
E $ /

"%/
%
.

>+88*>**(6 <
% =
%
)
"

"
3.

4
?

9
$

0$
!

"

4
!

. 0
5

3.

)$

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
17
23
24
26
17
16
17
17
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
139
274
275
292
301
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
717
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
%
.
"%/
9
+9++ D <
! )
!
"
5%/# 05"%
&"%5/
" 6
. #
K 5 ! 3 .
%
1!
$
*++/
%
#
%
&
' %
+/9 9**
#$ $ '
!
"
(
4
)
(=5->( $ <
! )4
. $ $.$
%
4
0

9
) 0

"%/
%

+9++ D <
%
%
<
3$

7%

0
)

'

"

"

1!
"

4
.
!

*++
) #$ $

>
>

""

!
.

H
)

H
H "

H "
!%

!
.

% $

)$

! H
%

H %!

!%

"

"
". !% !

C! )
$

8
%

% %!

"

"

"

9 !

4
0
% 4

"

"

!%

"

"

"

9!%,
)
%

) 0$

"

"

$
) "

$
$
)

(8
@

E7
%

"

)%

"

!%

"
"
%

"

). "

)
""

%
)

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

)
.

$
.

!)

)
"

C!

#$ $
G

"

" <
$.

"

)
"

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
18
24
25
27
18
17
18
18
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
140
275
276
293
302
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
818
of
41

!
%! !

$
.

! $

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
) "

!
)
%

. "

C!

) .

"

*++/

) "

'!

>

"

$ 6

!
"

"!

"!

"

"

" %
% 8

"

"

)
>

" C!

$ 5

= %!

! %

3 )! %

0$

".

'

"4
$
"%00"

#"

" /

9 "%

-"%

9 )**F

"0 "1-"%

& 5" !" #"

B. *++/
3

#
.

%%
5

3 !% )

"

'

'
!

& 5 # -""

# !!"##9

9 )**F
9

3 !% )

5"
-" !

9 ; # /!"

.
!

"

$.

$ +/9

-' 0

5/%&

/%! /

"&

0$

"

4
%

5" #"! %/ '

"

"

& )

"

/99

& & " 0% !"##

0$

#
%

4/ 5&% 4

/ $ /

-# % ! /

) 4

5" ! #" 4/

.
!

$ +/9*F+/ $

"
!

"&

%%

<

& &"#/#

(=5->( $

# ?*(>66(6@ /

5/# ! #" /# # /

9 "./&" !"

&

*++/

**

'

#$ $

" ' "

0$

' %

) %
%

"

L 3
!%

"

2
)

"

) '

"
%

!
!

" !

C!
"

9 -

7
%

3
)

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
19
25
26
28
19
18
19
19
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
141
276
277
294
303
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
919
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

D
-

"

$
!

7
"

+?

)%

#$ $

)H )

<

*++/$

!
&

<

"
< !

. !

"

! !

! !

)H

) "

9 !

!
"

A!

! .

(=5->( $ <

"

&
!

$ &

$.

"

"

+/9

9**

F)

#$ $
-""

"

"

"!
)?

)$

0$

0$

"

#$ $
"

"

) 4

! $

0$

%%
*DG

"

"

! )
!

""

)
!

#$ $ '

*++/
%

) 3

)
!

!
! !

% $

. =

) %

"

3
"

0$

"
.

""

M$
. % 3

%!

"!

5!

"
"

*++B
%

" *++
)H

&@ #< =

0$
H

! %

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

8
H

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
20
26
27
29
20
19
20
20
20
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
142
277
278
295
304
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
10
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

2
" ) !
4

"

"

"

"%-

"

) "

" <

0$

).
3

,
5"%

1 "
!

"

7 %

%$.

3
$ 6

"

"

!%

&
!

&

$
%

5"%

1 "

"
%

5"%

7 %

5 1 # D
.

"

' "

! %

"

. 0 $.

8%

! %

' %

0$
)

H
)

"

. !

' =4

?
.

H ""
%

0$

" ' "


"

$ 6

" &@ #< = $

"

"

B+?

"

"

!
%

)
!

)
.

"

' %

< '

&

"

"

" &@ #< =

) '

'

"

%) %

>

&

5%

3 ) %
"

"
)

'
)

"

"

&

%'

3 )

". !""

)
"

3 )%

"%-

)3

)$

0 $.

"

"

$ 6

0$

"

"

". !""
!

"

!""

"%-

1/ ' 2/#

".

0$. 5 %

5"

"%-

!
)

"

% %

" &@ #< =

!
H
"

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
21
27
28
30
21
20
21
21
21
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
143
278
279
296
305
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
11
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
"

"

1 "

"

"%-

"

"

<

"!
$

6
%

%)$ (

' %

" <

. 4
)

!%. <

" "

.
$

"

"

?
%

& @

&

).

"
%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

0
)

) "

"

"

"

"

)0

"

"
%

"

).

-?5

! .

"

)$ L !
. *++

4$

0 $. "
3
3

L 3

8 B
""

)4
. 0!

>

0!

<

"

"

$.

4$

" *+++$

" <

" *++ .

%%

"

>

0!

& )

&

* .

"

"
. 0 $.

"

" <

"

$. L !

"
)

"

! %

3 "

"

% $

"

M$

) "

&

"

%) (8%

! !

"

B+? .

<

. 0 $.

. 0 $.

-='(=
)

&

4$

"

. 0 $.

" E +$++$

!""

4$

&

E*++$++

43 .
.

"

4$

" "
3

"

$ 5

. 0$

0!

%
!

<

"

+? $ 6

"

) 0

).

#$ $

"

>

&

"

"

"

&@ #< = $

"

$ 5)

DB

$ 6

. %
!

DF

) "

%
%

"

)G
)

),

>
0

$ 6

5"%@

1!

G
%

"

"

#$ $
!

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
22
28
29
31
22
21
22
22
22
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
144
279
280
297
306
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
12
of
41

"
.

"
!

E +.+++$++$

&

' )
$

6
!

"

%
$

"
%

" #$ $
:

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
!

" )

"

"%-

"

" ? %

0$

"

1
.

"
.

"
$

? -""

<

"

% )

"

"

"

' %

99

77

"!

%
"

" 4

8
6

0!

5%

"

"

/$

&

"

) 4

)
8

$ 4
. 4

"

$. +/9

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

3.

' 4

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
23
29
30
32
23
22
23
23
23
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
145
280
281
298
307
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
13
of
41

3 )

"!

" #
" 4

"
)

.
0$4$ &

"

&
"

"

.
%

' 4

9**

4$

"

4$
"

B$

'
!

&

"!

$ <

<

1!

A! )

'

(=5->(

"

7 %

$ 4 )

" $

"!

4$

"!

"

"

#< -> 5 >@


)

3 E *.+++ "

!
"

'

" ! %

3 )

"

! "
$

"
!

)
5

5"%@

< 'M

%
>

"< '"

"

) "

" ? %

5)

0$

"

"%-

"

!%

5 1 #

! C

"

"

*$

3 )
8

" " ! % )

!
. 4

D.

D.

!
"

""

! "

*/.

!
0$

<

"'

"
"

)1

A!

&@ #< = $

) 1

+$

" !

"

"

1!

< ' 8%

"

4!

)"

"

5"%@

*F.

1 "
.

; %

*F*F >
0$

$
"

'
!

3.

43 .
"

"

&$ @

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
@

" <

>

% %

"

" <

"%-

" /#

%"1

"

8
!
%

$ <

"

).

" ./"4"% ?
%

#$ $

8%

3 )

"

+$

M'

&
7!

!%. <

)
!

E*+.+++

"

"

5"

5 5/#

"

"

"

& 5" !%/1/

"./"4 5" 4 %& J "

"

M$

+ J .
) @

"

" 4

!%. <

$$

"

!%. <

) E ++.+++
!

$.

A! )$

%"! %&#

)"

%
A! 3 )

"
)

&
%%

"

>

"./"4

5" 3

5!

5"

%!

<

%
&

"&

) "

/!/&"
%

)4

' %
)

& )

"$
!

" <

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

. 4

"

"
0

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
24
30
31
33
24
23
24
24
24
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
146
281
282
299
308
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
14
of
41

!
"

,
!

0! )

<

"
) H

"

) >

%
)

"

"

%%

' %

H"
!

#B " ! B

)$

"! %&

#/
%

-%/!
6

%/1/

"

!
)

B &"

""

) (

#/

"

%%

""

. "

) 5

- *

,
" >

0$

!
)

)
3

"

%'

" !

5" 1"

0$

&

<

/.

$.

%
$

"

& 4

!
%

MH

).
8

&

%
"

0$

%%

0$

"!

&

"

*9 %

3$

0$

"

"

"

"

%!

"
!

"

" ! )

3
6

0$

" 4 ' / @.

!
!

" #

J . *++/

. *++
6

"

F+*

) 0$

!
0$

! !

"
)

%%

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
%

" $

" <

. 4

#$ $ '

"

"

*++

"

(=5->(
'

"

2
4!
4

"

""

"
<

#$ $
"

"

<

)
++

)
"

F.+++

0$
!

D+.+++

'9=-&

"

0$

"

>

"
"" $

"

#$ $

"

"

&

"

!%.

4
<

-""

"

H' %
(

% H

"

"

H <

H <

"

"
)

0$

1 "

"%-

H <
!

%
H <

% H &
!

% )

1 "

"%-

<

(
.

"

4!

5"%.
!

% H
' "

" 1' 9

H <

! ) 1!

"

% H
-""

5"%.
% H &

% %

$.

>

. <

H <

H <

H =

!
(

'

"

8
&
!

% %

"

D
$
$"
% ,GG

1' -%

"

7
!%$
""
$

$
$

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
25
31
32
34
25
24
25
25
25
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
147
282
283
300
309
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
15
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

2
PP
-""

/# /10 %

! 11"%!/

#/ $

"1

9 "

"

"!%"

/K"& -' ! %0 %

-%

&! #

% "&

J "&/ 1J

"1

5/#

D2
"

# !

9 1 #

"E0"%/1"

#"!%" /." 9 % #
&% 1

" 5

/"4"%#

5" ".

/"4"%

"

9 5/# 4%/ / $

1"%/!

& !"%

# 9 % %" &

'#/#

"!5

$/"# - %

9 5"

&

5" %"#

5/# 5 # %"!"

/ $
' -""

# #" #
#
& "E0"%

"!5

$ "#

"# /9/"&

"

/"4/ $ 5 # %"!"
" ,** ! 10

"0 % 1"

$/!

&.
#

!"1"
%'

5/# # 1"

"

%"

5/# /#

"9" #"

# !

5"

5 & %"! %&"&


4 #

'

/"#

& 1 % " 9 %"! # #

#"& /

' 8 )**F
# 4/ 5

"1

9 5" " &/ $

'

" "./#/
% &/

/."

5'#/!/#

'

, 0! ) * . *++
0$
&
1 !%
2
$
$
!%$
5" 9
4/ $ %"
$"% / #"%./!"7
$
!%$
%
$
$
$
G
!%+
$"
3$
G
$
$
G
$
$
$
G% " G
0
%,GG
$) ! ! $
G
!%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
26
32
33
35
26
25
26
26
26
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
148
283
284
301
310
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
16
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
"0 "1-"% ( )**8

0$
&

!%

*/+
<

.4

'

B+F

3=
6

4$-$ 5 8 +**
.D/*+
4
9 ++9/ 9/B
8 9 BB9DFF9D +
, " 2"
"
"7 #
."%

'

3.

&) %
&

! $ '
6
) !
)$
) !
3

9
!"L

%."/

'

! # "%

3.

) Q

'9=-&
."

$
3

*++/
%

$
4

$M

7
<

3
$
%

+?
%

)G

&
1 !%
!"
!

&
'9=-&

!%$

.
!

"

)$ 5

.
$
+?

K
!

A$

$
>

3
"

"

)
% )
"! "

"
"

"

<

"

"

3
"

B/

"6
)$ >
)

3
$

'

!
8$

<
!

"

! <

"

"

"

)
"
. "

"

&

"

"

"

!"
6

>

%
)

/ $

" )

)
8%

/K"&

+/

%$

<

"

9 %

!
$

$'
G
'

<
%

& G"%

<

"

<
)

!%
"
) " ! "!
"! $

. <
.

3
) !,

#' .

"

) )
$ =

<

"

3. C!
!
8% !

<
)$ M

% %

"
1 <9
#$ $ ' %
%
!

>
5
" 0!
!

"-

F .
#$ $

4
E 5

! $

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
27
33
34
36
27
26
27
27
27
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
149
284
285
302
311
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
17
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
3
>

"

4
* "
). <

1 <9
!

"
.

"
)M
"

$
)
!

"

&

>
"

%
!
$<
%M$ 1
)M
%

6$ 5!
M
"
!
'

A
)
>

! "

> $ *++B9

. =

?
)

A!
"

. %

%
"

9* B+ "

<

"

"

" ) ! "

"
#$ $

"
&! 3

'
,++,++ ) !

=
"
<

>
>

. ?

) !
)

5
),

>

). "
#$ $

%
"

!
!
%

!
)
@

$
)

%
4

%
.
""
%

$ 1

)9
).

!
"
"
!
! ! $5
!
5 >

>
0 !
!

"

. 1
B

) F+.

3%

?
""

"" "

6$ 5!
! ) *+.

.
" =

"

"

). " "
!
%$
8

D$
?
%
%
>
%
"1
3

% C
$
!
6 % $
$
)

"

'

' %

& ) *F.

$R**S
)
.
)
'

)
$R*FS
4
%

>

"

> !
&

%.

!
I.
"

).

"
!
!

!
!

+? .

%%
"
%%

!
8%

!%

>
1
8
0
%%
#$ $ "
.
")
!
"

%
"

>

).
% )
""

"
8 !

!
%

$ M6

"
3

5!
. 5!
4

&

>

3
.
% )
! 9 ! $ $$$ 5!
.
%%
"
!
!
4
$ 5!
!
"
$
)
%
$
.
)
).
%
$
)
8
D. "
).
""
$M L !
$

3
?

).
& ) *F.

"

F/
"

) . "
.

%
!
9
R*DS

"

0
%

)
"

.M

.
!

G>

! !
)?

>
"

!
"

>

).
3

!
"

K
5 >
%
.
!

<
$ 0

.
& ) F. *++
)$ 6
"

"

"

)
%%

A$ -"

)$ <

$5!

' "
!

"
)

"
!

%
@ %%
)$
"&

"
8
1

%%

$ <

.
%

) = %!
"
1

"

'
)$

5
"
"

) = )

. "

>

). '

"

K
%%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

.
%

"

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
28
34
35
37
28
27
28
28
28
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
150
285
286
303
312
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
18
of
41

>
!

) %

! )
"

) >

&

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
M $ $ $ $
?
"
5
) = )
) 0
4
A!
% !
"
%%

<

% )
%%

)?$

!
5

.
"

"

" '

&

%)
5

B$
? "

D.
' "

)
M
$M )

8%

> .
"
1
6$ 5! . "
0
1!
.4
5
) = )
. "
K
&) "
.
! 4$
6 "
.
! 0$
1
>
). "
1
$ 5!
"
0

>
4

"
.
5

"

"
9

%
)

"
3

"

) = )
).
$

3%

)%

$
$M

,
"
!

'
.

."

"
"

'

"

K
>

$
)

>

'

"

.0$
. $
=
> )$

C!

> 8

0
1!
?
3
% $
=
. ( A$. " <
!
<
<
)? 1
! ) !
$

)
3
3 ) !
. )"
"

. " 4
0
%
$
7

>

)
"
4
)
(=5->( $ <
! "
(
"
$
*++B

%
%%

>
'

3$ 6
8%
!
"
.
%

)
"
1

6
!
)

!
$

!
)

$
!
5
% )"
+
D
/$

"

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

"

4
"

"

!
""$

-%

' "

"
)

)
!
#$ $ '
)

"
)

""

<

?
"

"

%
3 %

)
' "
3

1
"
3 5 )

"
3
$

!
!

4" !

" ' "

3 !% )
"
.

%
)

)
!% "
)
"

"
3

)
!
!% C!

"

! .
)
&) "

%
)?

0
%
1!
3
4
3

. 0
)

"

" *++/
) *
"
&
) &! ! .
)
. '$ 4
%
$
! !
*
"
' %
!
) 6
)
)
)
$
)
!
3
!%
"
$
! ) 4
. $ $.
> $ *++/9 9+*
'
" 4
)
$

$
$

4
"

*$ 6
%

%
"

)
*. *++/ "
' 3
3

).
0! )

0! )

)$

&

!
!

.
F.
3

$.
!
"

39 9%

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
29
35
36
38
29
28
29
29
29
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
151
286
287
304
313
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
19
of
41

>

.=

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

0$
&
2
$
$
$
$"
$
$
%,GG

1
$

!%$
!%+

G
3$

!%
!%$
%
$

G
G

$) ! !

$
$

$
G

G%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

"

0
!%

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
30
36
37
39
30
29
30
30
30
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
152
287
288
305
314
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
20
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

! "
%& '
%

%
#$

"

" (

* '

"

&

$#

( -

&

'

* '

#
% ((

"

( ''

'

)( #""

"
'

''
"

''

( "

* !

'

&
%

'

+ %

%&

% % $

#$
'#

'

7 '

&

( "

'

#'

%) *

+
+ '

'

'

+ ' #

::

'

$
% + $

"

'' '

'

! &

<

#%

'

''
"

%'

./05 *

#'

"

*
&

'

::

# %

&

;'

'

#$

%
'

'

'

+ $

#'

'

(
"#

! "

%#

'' * #%

&

#$

!*

"

& '

'' * #%

&

'

'

* &

'

'

%#'

* ' '

"

;'

%
'%

( "

798 !

' (

'

* #%

'

''

%'

"

* !

% ) "

% ! * #%

#(("

! 2(

#%

'

'!

&

''

# %

# '

"'

"

# % ! "

) *

' (

" '

"" %

%&

*',

'#
#

( ./01

& & %

7 "$

%$

#% '

'(

% "'
'

' &

' #

'

% " !

'

'

'

% "' 6

%
( ''

#$

# %

' &

"

#$

%'

% $

* !

'

% $ '

&

' )
"

'

* '

((

'
!

#$

% !%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

" %$
#"

'

<

!
!"

"$ '

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
31
37
38
40
31
21
30
31
31
31
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
41
50
51
51
51
Page
153
288
289
306
315
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365

&

% (
!

" % '
'

" %

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
October
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
10,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
32
38
39
41
32
31
32
32
32
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
154
289
290
307
316
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
33
39
40
42
33
32
33
33
33
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
155
290
291
308
317
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
34
40
41
43
34
33
34
34
34
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
156
291
292
309
318
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

!
$%
'

"

&
( )!

*+ ,

-''.#!' /0 12. )!
/01- . !#!-/ 1
1!/
!1.230/. !/4 !45!/ .4 ".4-! #206)
5
!

)
5

71

'

!
#

&

!
+( $

'

"
$

,
.
2
7

0
6
9
:
;
,/
,,
,.
,2

%
()" *

&
"

'
)

"

'
!

4
)
)
4
)
.//0
1
.
2
- (
4
!
(0
3
( '' '
0
4
5
.//6 - &
, !
#
'
/
( (
&
!
*
5
!
&
((! ' 4
'
2
1
( "
.//6 ' 4
'
!
:
2
3 ( '
(
!
'
'
5
/
('
%
"
2
( '
(
%
.//: ' 4
'
5
( '
(
*
<
8
' 4
'
3
;
('
(
&
)
'
'
4
#
.//;
, !
#
!
3
< 2
3 ('
"
6
#
(
*
!
#

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

+ !!

- &

&

-&
&

, !
(

#
) 3

#
!)8
%
./,0
( '
(
#
./,0
5
# &
.//6
.//: ' 4
'
&
./,0
5
.//:
.//: ' 4
(

3
(
"
*

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
35
41
42
44
35
35
35
35
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
51
51
51
Page
157
292
293
310
319
ofof
173
183
318
319
356
365

#
6

*
.//0

.//6

'

'
5

&

#
*
'
)=

.//; ' 4
( "

1
'
(

.//;

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

,7 1#-& &
,0 '
4
4
'
,6
"
1
,9 0<;
,: &
3
8
='
&

< ('
2

"
3 ('

<

('
4
./,/ ' 4
< 3 ('
(#
(&
&
#

./,/ ' 4
1

>

(
1
&
$
'
.0 ./,/
#
&
)
( #
.6 ./,/

(%
+

& %
#1 #
$& &

'
*

./,/ '

&

!
' 4
4

.0 ./,/
#
!

'
&
1 5

5
$

&

"
!
1
$$ 5

=( $

: ./,0

%(

+
/

$, '

( *

.//,0

$> 3

./,0

( ''

'

%
4

$& 1
)

$% ?
$+ )
+
1
!
$*

'@
1
&

./,,

/0 ..::

!
"

*
,.0. 4
(/
'"
5

3
!8# (
+

&
0
>

./,0
3

( '
(

.2 ./,0
(

1
"

&

0
!

1
$A 6

&

'

&
'&

./,6

&
#

!
#

; ./,6

+
1!

$& 4

@ #

,0 ./,6

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Media
Caterbone
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Executive
Summary
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
36
42
43
45
36
3636
of
of
172
173
174
176
of
51
51
51
Page
158
293
294
311
320
of51
173
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
12,
15,
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
37
43
44
46
37
36
37
37
37
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
159
294
295
312
321
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
27
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
38
44
45
47
38
37
38
38
38
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
160
295
296
313
322
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
28
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
39
45
46
48
39
38
39
39
39
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
161
296
297
314
323
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
29
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

! "

"

$% &
!

" #

%
"&#
(

'
!

(
,

"

"

")

"

""
-

)
!
! "
!

'
%

" !
"

!
)

+
!

" *
"

"
,

,
,

*
%

*
(

%
!
/"0

1
1 ,
"
"

4
!

"

"
!

!
#
.

.
&,,0
%

1 ,

2"3

!
)

** ! "
&,,..$/

&,,

%
&,,
%

&

, "

"

00

"

!,

"

6
7

7 , !
&,,-

8,
:
(

$;$

"2

! " ,

, ,

** !

;
5

$
!

&,,@

,
.

&<;=

>
1

9
,

&,,=
$

,
>
A

1 B3

.+

&,,=
1 B3

2
>
%

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
40
46
47
49
40
39
40
40
40
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
162
297
298
315
324
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
30
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

<

1
1

* "
!

"
C#

"$

"

<
*

&, ,

24

#9

; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%

&,,0 4
! %3

"

"

!
&,,
%

!
4

'
5

4
D

%
%

"

""

,! "
0 =

0 =9

9
00&9 00

:
9

&,,-

&, , $
!

%
!
D

%
%

=
F
!

))
+

/4

),

"

0 =

/
$

G
3

%
00

3
3

"

%#
$

$
&, ,

&,,4

!- "

.
&,,@

,
*

&,,<
E

&,,

-) !
/ 4

24
/

$
D

&, ,
D

$
&,,-

&,,0

%
D

!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D

$
A
8F
$

%
;

D
.

%
&,,3
E
$

*
00=; 00

$
5

! 7

0 =
00

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
41
47
48
50
41
40
41
41
41
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
163
298
299
316
325
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
31
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

)
A

24
$;$

00
(F

&

%
B

5
00 9

" * <
00=( 00 9

:#

> ) "" ""


$

;3

#, " !
&,,-

"

"

"

0 =
&, ,

/
.
$

B
3

3
=

0 =

) "

.
&,,1

0 =

24

" "
3

"
&,,@

" E

""

B
$

<

&,,1

.
&,,-

,-(&&
2

=
@,

"

&,
3

&,,!

&,,@

&,,@

0 =
@, 1

&,,@
9
!
@,

#" !,
0 =

" "1 ,

"

"*

":

" E
F

&,,-

!
B

/
!

"

00=( 00 9
B
:
9

$
'

.
&,,1
9

0 =
&, ,

/
.

00 9

/
&,,9

&,

( "

!
.

00

$
!

&, ,
F

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

3
7

8
!

&,,

&, ,

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
42
48
49
51
42
41
42
42
42
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
164
299
300
317
326
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
32
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

&

, * "

&&

*#
"

&:

;!

&<

:
%

$
&, ,

$
&,,-

!-

,
5
%

"

>

$
$

< !-

24

? "
;

>

&,,0
B

&,,%
(

$
&, ,

&-

A
.+ $

&@

! :

&,,$

: , *

&, ,

* @

&,,@

"
E

3
&,,

"

&,,0

7 "!

7 "
0 =
*

&=

) "

":

)"

&,,@
"

&

&0

!
< ")
9 &,,@
9
&, ,
&,,

00

:,

!6
+
:

"

"

" .
9 &,,0

0 = "&#

, *

&,,@
/

" F
0 =

;A

0 =
F

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

0 =

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
43
49
50
52
43
42
43
43
43
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
165
300
301
318
327
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
33
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
!

3
"

$
+

$
.

0 =

I $
!

0 =

.
$

"2

'

+$;F
D
"$

&,;&,
3
A

00

'
$ 24

"1E1# $

K
E
A

00&

>

L
F

F
B

F
+

0=,K
A

$
$

1
+

>

1
$
>

B
!

3
F

1
00
) % 3
&,,-

!
>

! A !

00,K
1 B3
>

F
F
& 1

F
8

! 4

'
A

! 4

A
0=,K

F
00,K

0 ,K

0<,K

3
/

>

%
&,,

) %$
D 1

"
$

0 <9 F

0@,K
0@,K
$

2!

A? D!B
#
*

$
7

+
00

D 18

.
E

$
M 1
00= E

0 =
%

0 ,K
$

0 =

M
00
!

&,,9

(
9

!
1

,-(

$ !2B+EF2

(&&

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
44
50
51
53
44
43
44
44
44
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
166
301
302
319
328
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
34
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

") !

"

7!

N
.
!
5
F

(
(

5
G
*

A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!

,
B

A
" " * #" !, " "

$C

* #" !, D

73

8
* 7

,
"

"

&

"
#

.
"

#(

5
7
9

'
5

%
7A

8 !

8 !

'

!
7D .2

O
% 8

'
7

'

(
(

%
%

4
K
K

M %

%
K
'

7E

(
8

"

%
'

%(

(
(

4
;

(
7
7

87

(
(

8
8

- 7 > !,

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
45
51
52
54
45
44
45
45
45
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
167
302
303
320
329
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
35
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016
!

* , "
!

B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B

@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD

B@
)
B@

DD
!

"
)
*
!

")

1
3
1

))

1"

)
)

, "

*"

"
, "

!
*

"

")

"

7
"!

"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "

*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !

)
*

"E

DD

")

E DD
%

,
!

!"

, "

"

"

"

1 ,"

DD

*)

PPPPPPP "

>7

%#

'?

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

June 19, 2015


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP

15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.

I
&, ,

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
46
52
53
55
46
45
46
46
46
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
168
303
304
321
330
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
36
of
41

Don't Know When

24

$
$

Q &, , "!
I

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
47
53
54
56
47
46
47
47
47
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
169
304
305
322
331
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
37
of
41
Page 35 of 41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
48
54
55
57
48
47
48
48
48
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
170
305
306
323
332
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
38
of
41
Page 36 of 41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
49
55
56
58
49
48
49
49
49
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
171
306
307
324
333
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
39
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
50
56
57
59
50
49
50
50
50
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
172
307
308
325
334
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
40
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
J.
Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Summary
Mind
Stan
J.
Control
Caterbone
Transcripts
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus

Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
51
57
58
60
51
50
51
51
51
of
of
of
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
Page
173
308
309
326
335
of
173
183
318
319
356
365
Page
41
of
41

Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday,
March
December
15,
March
April
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
2015
2016
Monday
Sunday,
August
June
22,
5, 2015
Saturday,
October
10,

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"

!
#"

!
)

* ++

,*
+

+,$ !
$% &
+
%
$% &
$% &

1"&&$&&& !
. -

'

'

'
'
. '
$% &
'
'
+
'

!'

/
- ,

'

% *
%
*

%
.

'

'
2

'

3
5'
* % 6
7 %
%

%!
)
5 '
'
'
') %
%
6 %!
'
% :
'
'!'
*%
*
%
.
%
( 7
'*
= '
% !
.
%
(

%
.
; .*

/ '%
' ' 9!
'
<
=
4 '>
'
@#<
*

."
!

! ,
A41 ) $086B 9
'
!
*
%
C 1
C 1
)
!
& !
)D& $A

' %
'

'

2!

'!
* '

/
.,

B
B
: 0$0? $086B
*
=>8 4
.

B
C 1
.

+,0

'
!' ) '
,
*
*
*
'
!'
.
*
. .
*
.
' .
. *
' '!'
.*
'&
$ /
* $
' 0 '!'
*
$
' 0 '!'
1
0
'
** ' !
$% .
' %
' !
*
!'
'

*
'
'
' '(
)
'
% (
& !
. %
%
+ !' ,
%
/
1
8%
'
/ ' ,
%
%
6 %!
)
1
?
% %

$%

"#$ %&"'(
+ *
/

'
' A4 4 A1>
'!
' ) '

.
'
*
# %
' ' 8%
%.
'

' ) '
E

?
*

'

'

'

.,
=

% !
.B
* '
'
**

'
%
'

'
.B
'
'

' A
%
%

'
%
'
*

'
B

B *

E
F

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
111of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
174
309
310
327
336
of
183
318
319
356
365

'

E
'F

'

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

C 1
' %
'!
' ) ' ?
% !
'
' ' *
'
'
' '
#7 '
9=%
,
:
%
*
'
'
% 0
G 1
*
90 1
' '
.
0 2 !
% *
'
( ,
'
## : & *
.
*
'
' * '
' %
%
%
%
' *
*
' %
'
%
'
.
' =
H
%
* %
'
/
.
'
=
* % * ;
%
% % 1
'
*
%
* ;
'!
' ) ' ?
* %
'
A . * .
%
! ' *
1
>
1
.
1 . %'
'1
1 ! "&
. =%
,
* % 0 1
' I
'
*

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
222of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
175
310
311
328
337
of
183
318
319
356
365

.
'

'

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"

!
#"

%%$ %&"'
3 4

67

0 % !
% !
#7
'
* % ! .
#7 0
%
%
'
'*
'
' % 6
0
%
'
% !
*
'
' ' #*
% ' .

D %

8
'
%
0

' !
D %
. 0
2!

! "

!
'

%
'

%
*

. %
% J

D
G 1
% %
'
!
'

*
%
%
' *

'

'
/
' '
. J 0
0 1 %
'
* % 10
( ,
+
0
'
%
' %

' ' * %
' % '
*
/
'
'*
% &
1
' %
*
%
% .
%
.
% ' $% .
!
'
'
%
**
%
% .
! %
'
%
.!
- .
% %
$%
' *
%
%
% ; '
.
'
*
'
. %
' '
%
%
'
1
.
' . 0
%
4
6$
*
% &
$% ' 1
1
*
%
! !
% >
1
*
!
'
'
'
) %
'
%
. ## E
%
' *
%
## &
+
C '
+ H
*
' %
.
'
J
* %
*
'
% 4
%
/
J
'
' %
*
$%
'
'
%
%
.!
. ?
%
)/
%
' % %
* #
%
.
%
% * % * '
%
>
1
$
/
7
'
!
% >
+ H *
% * '
%
%

%
C '
*
, 1

)/
%

'

%
%

'

.
/
% '

$%
' ' @7 >

$% .
) %
' '!
0
.
* %
*
!
. %
*
%
C '
.
%
*

'
%
%%
' . %
' *

) %
1
.1
%
%
$
) !

/
*1
*
"

'

'
' .

%
.

$% >
'
G4
!

#
'

'

J? ' 8 ' , . J
'
' **
*
. **
*
% 0 % '
'
.
' **
! .
%'
% )85 6$
.
' %
%
.
'
%
* %
'
.
* % ! .
%
) %
). **
'
*
%
% %
'
'
%
*
%
%
0
%
.
%
% >
1
% * '
) . *
@ 0
% &
+
!
! '
' '
.
* '
%
/
*
*
.
'*

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
333of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
176
311
312
329
338
of
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

' 0 *

'

% '
#7

. *
'
! J $%
* '

'
J'

% '
'
'
'
. ## E 0
*
% % ' %
*
1+A8)E %
' '
%
'
' '
'*
'
'
' $ . ,
!
' % *
'
* 6
K /
' !
'
'
% *
.
%
' % A018
%
.
.
%*
% J? ' 8 ' , . J
% '

LLLLLLLLLLLLLF FLLLLLLLLLLL
$
9
!
*** . +
+
.
/

%
0 %
*
!

#7 E %
#7 E

/
/
,

!
9

*
%

*#

'
'

' '

,
-

, +
-

- !!
,
1
..

+, 1
6
" @#B "
1
6
" #7@B
6
)+
B
+ ,1
6
7"

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
444of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
177
312
313
330
339
of
183
318
319
356
365

@ B
@"
# )+
B
"

"
#B

B
"@@ @
" 77B
"@
B

"

@#

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

::

$
-"%;& :
9
,
/ + !

.
$
"#'&<
3 #"#=>%'=;<;?

*
. *

.!

).

C 1

'

0
*
'

% * *

% !

'.

' %
!

0 % !
*

B
%

% !

$ :

'

0 %

**

**

+
-

'

'

'

0% !

--

--

, +

+ @
8

.!

. %

'

--

,
* %

.
/ '

,
,

**

'

'

0 % !

$
$ 9

B
;

. / * ,

+$
5

:0 %

0
--

A 5

' %

'

' %

% !

' *

**

.
.

0 %

, +

!
*

'

' ) ' 1

'

''
*

' % %

+ 5

' %
+

. &

'

3 9

$ 9

'
%

'

--

'

. 9 '!'

''

C 1

**
*

**
-

'

.
!
/

'
0 %

%.

**
'

%
.

.%

. *
'

'

'
'

'

. *

0
.

'

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
555of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
178
313
314
331
340
of
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

% !

!
*

' '

* 9

' '

. %

&

'
'

'

M >
'

'.

.*

'
*

'

%
F*
' ?

* !

'

!
'

'

% %

'.

'

'*B

+8+

1% *

* 1
.

" M

**

NC

'

'

! !

' !

'

'

$
'O

*
' %

&

'

.*

'

' !

'

'

'
%
.

!
*

'.

%
;

'

. 0 '
%

' *

'

'

* %
'

L' 'L;

&

* % &

+ *

'

" M

'

' $ *

' >

** ' !

! !

'
!

'

F' 'F'

* %
%

: *
!

'

**

''

0 %

9>> : >
'

'!'
% !

F'

3FF

0 '!'

'

%
.

*+ *

0 % !

&

A %

* %

'

'

' !

% >

4-

'

'

'

0
.

.%

%
% '

$%

* + *

+
*

% .

'

'

'

3
"<

"<

"<

5 9 /D $%

/ /

/ 99
"< "
-

'

'

.
"< %

'

'

% *

C 9

%
.

' '
. -

+ +

$%

%
'

;
:

:
! .

"< % "

! !

%
'

*
'

'

;
:

;
. 9
.

'
' %

4.

%.
/

. %
;

% %

;
'

. !

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
666of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
179
314
315
332
341
of
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"< % %
'

2!
'

'

'

'

% *

+ +

+ +1

'

* %

* %

%
"< % < B .
&

'

'

'

*
' >

'

A814+&A4

% *

'

>

% %

4-

+ +

'

'

'

'
'

/
.

' %

;
.

% %

+
*

*
%

0%

,
!!

!
,

% 0

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$
-

, +

- 9

,
-

. $ 6

,-

- 9

-,

6
*

*+
,,

,
-$

$
+ $
,

++
-- 2

2
,

. G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ !

,
! , ,

G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
,

'

- HHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ %&HHHH$

F!

./

'
%

--

,$ HHHHHHHHH

'

'!'

' 9 :

F+

.
, .

--

,
+

+ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
777of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
180
315
316
333
342
of
183
318
319
356
365

.. ,,

2!

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016

KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...

1 of 4

http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

December 9, 2015

Letters to the Editor, News and Commentary

!
!
"

"#
$

%
'

&

)*$

"#

"#
&

,
-

"
.

$/

$
$

&
,

"#

"

45)4&

$
"

'

&

$
&

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
888of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
181
316
317
334
343
of
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM

KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...

2 of 4

http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

"#
$

$
&

"#

8
&
)9*5$

"#
& :1

)9*5$

" &;
,

8
,

"#7

&
<

"

&

$
$

&
$

&3

"#

&
3

"#
&

3
$

&=
%

&
$

&
"#

&
#

&
3

"#
.

&

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
999of
of
of113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
182
317
318
335
344
of
183
318
319
356
365

Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM

KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...

3 of 4

http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...

Published by the Advanced


Federal
MediaHabeus
Habeas
Group and
Corpus
Stan
Statutes
J. Caterbone
Prescribed
Copyright
In
in 28 2242
2016

&.

"# .

&
$1

"

$ >:

"#; .

&?

$"

&

&

>3

$? "

&>

&?

$
"#

&

$
&

&
$

$
$

&

&

'

&

&@

$
8

"

&

$
1

>

& #<

&
(

"#
,

&
8

+
3

&# &3

$# &6

&
+

'

&
#<

# &6
&

Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT
of Stan
of Transcripts
Stan
J.Caterbone
J
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
re
reState-of-Affairs
Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Page
Page
Page
10
10
10of
of
of
of365
113
23
27
23
Mind J.
Stan
Control
Caterbone
Writ
of Habeus
Corpus
Page
183
318
319
336
345
183
318
319
356

&
Tuesday,
March
Monday
Sunday,
August
June22,
5, 2016
3/22/2016 2:11 AM

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 346
337 of 365
356
Page 1 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 347
338 of 365
356
Page 2 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 348
339 of 365
356
Page 3 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 349
340 of 365
356
Page 4 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 350
341 of 365
356
Page 5 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 351
342 of 365
356
Page 6 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 352
343 of 365
356
Page 7 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 353
344 of 365
356
Page 8 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 354
345 of 365
356
Page 9 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 355
346 of 365
356
Page 10 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 356
347 of 365
356
Page 11 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 357
348 of 365
356
Page 12 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 358
349 of 365
356
Page 13 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 359
350 of 365
356
Page 14 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 360
351 of 365
356
Page 15 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 361
352 of 365
356
Page 16 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 362
353 of 365
356
Page 17 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 363
354 of 365
356
Page 18 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 364
355 of 365
356
Page 19 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016

Life Insurance Policy

Stan J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus


Downtown Lancaster Handout

Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Prescribed In 28 2242


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

Page 365
356 of 365
356
Page 20 of 20

Monday August 22, 2016


Friday August 19, 2016