Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
org/
1
2
School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Prof. C.R. Rao Road, Hyderabad 500046, India
kallepalli@lp3.univ-mrs.fr; dkln1982@gmail.com
Abstract
Herein, we present and compare our spectroscopic results
on femtosecond (fs) laser irradiated polymers Poly Methyl
Methacrylate (PMMA), Poly Di Methyl Siloxane (PDMS)
with crystal media such as Lithium Niobate (LiNbO 3 ).
Dependence of the structure width with irradiation dose and
scan speed is illustrated. Keldysh parameter calculations are
highlighted to describe the dominant ionization process.
Formation of micro-craters at low irradiation dose and high
scan speed is analyzed through minimal pulse to pulse
overlap. Formation of defects such as optical and
paramagnetic centers in case of polymers is compared with
the absence of such defects in crystal media. Confocal microRaman studies carried out on polymers and crystal are
presented.
Keywords
Fs laser direct writing; Polymers; Crystals; Emission; Defects
Introduction
Fs laser direct writing is a unique tool for fabrication
of micro and nano-structuration of transparent
materials as it provides short pulse duration but at the
same time sufficient fluence to overcome the damage
threshold of the targets [1]. Since the interaction of
these fs pulses with transparent material is nonlinear,
the energy deposited by a focused fs pulse is confined
inside the focal volume. This results in a submicrometer structuring of materials which finds
application in various fields [2-9]. A variety of
materials including metals, dielectrics, polymers, and
semiconductors have been successfully processed by
with fs pulses [10-15].
Experimental Results
Bulk samples of PMMA were purchased from
Goodfellow, USA. PDMS was home made. These
samples were cut into 1 cm 1 cm dimensions and
33
Structure
Width (m)
30
60
90
Energy (J)
FIG. 2 CONFOCAL MICROSCOPE IMAGE OF (A)
MICROSTRUCTURES FABRICATED AT 0.5 MM/S SPEED. LEFT
EXTREME STRUCTURE IS FABRICATED AT 100 J ENERGY.
LEFT TO RIGHT, ENERGY IS DECREASING. SPEED IS 0.5 MM/S.
(B) THE STRUCTURE FABRICATED AT 635 NJ ENERGY. (C)
PLOT OF STRUCTURE WIDTH VERSUS ENERGY FOR SET 1 AND
SET 2.
www.jpo-journal.org/
34
12
PMMA
PDMS
LiNbO3
0.8
Irradiated
Excitation (nm)
1-458
2-488
3-514
4-543
(a)
675
750
0.4
0.0
20
40
60
80
Peak Intensity (PW/cm2)
35
2 3 4
1
1.0
0.8
0.6
Pristine
0.4 Excitation (nm)
5-458 6-488
0.2 7-514 8-543
0.0 5 6 7 8
450 525 600
Wavelength (nm)
Excitation(a.u.)
Structure
width (m)
Keldysh Parameter
1.2
(c)
Emission (a.u.)
www.jpo-journal.org/
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
monitoring
(nm)
570
598
460
499
450
561
530
270
(c)
360
450
540
Wavelength (nm)
FIG. 4 (A) CONFOCAL MICROSCOPE IMAGES OF PMMA
(GOODFELLOW). ~20 M WIDE MICRO CHANNEL INSIDE THE
BULK OF PMMA. (B) EMISSION SPECTRA AT DIFFERENT
EXCITATION WAVELENGTHS (C) EXCITATION SPECTRA AT
DIFFERENT MONITORING WAVELENGTHS
Emission (a.u.)
1.00
0.75
(a)
Irradiated
4 Excitation (nm)
1-458, 2-488
3
3-514, 4-543
0.50
0.25
0.00
Pristine Region
Excitation (nm)
5-458, 6-488, 7-514, 8-543
5
6 7 8
525
600
675
750
Excitation (a.u.)
0.4
monitoring
(nm)
530, 570, 734
0.0 605, 771, 645
em(nm)
300
375
450
525
Wavelength (nm)
Wavelength (nm)
600
(b)
0.8
(c)
PMMA
PDMS
450
300
300
450
ext(nm)
60
200 (a)
(1)
0
-200
Irradiated
50 J energy (1)
Pristine(2)
(2)
-400
320
330
340
(b) (3)
200
Pristine (1)
3 J nergy (2)
(2) 6 J energy (3)
0
(1)
-200
324
327
330
www.jpo-journal.org/
36
150
(a)
Unirradiated
Perpendicular
Parallel
450
-150
310
320
330
340
350
200
(b)
Irradiated
Perpendicular
Parallel
450
0
-200
310
320
330
340
150
(a)
3
120
90
60
www.jpo-journal.org/
1. Unexposed PMMA
2. fs exposed PMMA (Middle)
3. fs exposed PMMA (End)
30
2400
2800
800
(b)
Pristine (1)
Middle (2)
End (3)
600
400
3
1
200
2400
3200
-1
Raman shift (cm )
2800
3200
(c)
200
0
Parallel
Irradiated
-200 Unirradiated
300
320
340
37
(a)
A1(TO4)
Pristine
100 J,End
100 J, Middle
40 J
0.50
0.25
300
600
Raman Shift (cm-1)
900
1.0
A1(TO2)
0.75
A1(TO1)
A1(TO1)
0.8
Pristine (b)
100 J,End
100 J, Middle
40 J
A1(TO2)
0.6
240
260
Raman Shift (cm-1)
280
1.00
0.9
A1(TO4)
0.6
Pristine (c)
100 J,End
100 J, Middle
40 J
0.3
600
620
640
660
Raman Shift (cm-1)
Mechanism
Raman
mode
response
Reference
Local
environment
densification
and
compressive
stress
Increase in
phonon
mode
frequencies
especially
for A 1 ((TO 4 )
58
Reduction in
the Li content
Broadening
of Raman
modes
especially
for A 1 ((TO 1 )
and Raman
shift for
A 1 ((TO 1 )
54, 56-57
Reduction in
spontaneous
polarization
due to largescale defects
Broadening
of Raman
modes and
Reduction in
Raman
intensity
59-61
Ionic
rearrangement
Changes in
Raman shifts
54,60
www.jpo-journal.org/
38
www.jpo-journal.org/
Interscience, 2003.
1997.
A. Jayaraman, and A. A. Ballman, "Effect of pressure on the
1086.
G.
Valle,
R.
Osellame,
and
P.
Laporta,
G.
Della
Valle,
R.
Osellame,
and
P.
Laporta,
2009.
H. Lao, H. Zhu, and X. Chen, "Surface Ablation of
Congruent
and
Mg-Doped
Lithium
Niobate
by
2009.
Poly (dimethylsilylene), Macromolecules, Vol. 24, 132B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W.
Shore, and M. D.Perry, "Nanosecond-to-Femtosecond
Laser-Induced
Breakdown
in
Dielectrics,"Physical
Sun,
Y.
Xu,
S.
Matsuo,
and
H.
Misawa,
KGd(WO4)2 by
low
dose
H+
formation
H.-B.
139, 1991.
ion
39
Della
www.jpo-journal.org/
500, 1987.
Characterization
of
Microstructures,
Craters,
and
1988.
K. A. Al-Hassan, and W. Rttig, Free volume sensing
1997.
femtosecond
and
PDMS,
PMMA
laser-irradiated
optical
characterization
of
(dimethylsiloxane)
for
using
femtosecond
pulses
investigations
of
femtosecond
laser
irradiated
at 800 nm towards lab-on-a-chip applications, PramanaJ. Phys. Vol. 75, 1221-1232, 2010.
K. L. N. Deepak, S. Venugopal Rao, and D. Narayana Rao,
R.
R.
Gattass,
and
E.
Mazur,
Femtosecond
laser
40
www.jpo-journal.org/
41