Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Personnel economics has been dened as the application of economic and mathematical approaches and
econometric and statistical methods to traditional questions in human resources management.[1] It is an area of
applied micro labor economics, but there are a few key
distinctions. One distinction, not always clearcut, is that
studies in personnel economics deal with the personnel
management within rms, and thus internal labor markets, while those in labor economics deal with labor markets as such, whether external or internal.[2] In addition,
personnel economics deals with issues related to both
managerial-supervisory and non-supervisory workers.[3]
The subject has been described as signicant and different from sociological and psychological approaches to
the study of organizational behavior and human resource
management in various ways. It analyzes labor use, which
accounts for the largest part of production costs for most
rms, by formulation of relatively simple but generalizable and testable relationships. It also situates analysis in the context of market equilibrium, rational maximizing behavior, and economic eciency, which may
be used for prescriptive purposes as to improving performance of the rm.[4] For example, an alternate compensation package that provided a risk-free benet might
elicit more work eort, consistent with psychologicallyoriented prospect theory.[5] But a personnel-economics
analysis in its eciency aspect would evaluate the package as to costbenet analysis, rather than work-eort
benets alone.[6]
rm employment decisions and promotions, including hiring, ring, turnover, part-time and temporary workers, and seniority issues related to
promotions[8]
3 NOTES
Two millennial articles by a contributor to the subject argued in the course of review and assessment to the conclusions that:
[12] Axel Engellandt and Regina T. Riphahn, 2005. Tempo[B]ecause of the relevance and newly found
rigor of personnel analysis, personnel economics should and will become a more important part of the educational curriculum. The
eld is growing and has a large potential audience, of both students and practitioners.[28]
See also
Eciency wage
Notes
and Job Design, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(special issue), 2452.
[18] Edward Lazear, 1979. Why Is There Mandatory
Retirement?" Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), pp.
12611284.
_____, 1981. Agency, Earnings Proles, Productivity, and Hours Restrictions, American Economic Review,
71(4), pp. 606620.
_____, 1986. Salaries and Piece Rates, Journal of
Business, 59(3), pp. 405431.
_____, 1987. incentive contracts, The New Palgrave:
A Dictionary of Economics, v. 2, pp. 74448. Table of
Contents link.
_____ 1995. Personnel Economics. MIT. Arrow-page
searchable contents.
_____, 1999. Personnel Economics: Past Lessons and
Future Directions, Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2),
pp. 199236. (Presidential address to the Society of Labor Economists.)
_____, 2000a. Economic Imperialism, Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 115(1), pp. 11922 [pp. 99146.
_____, 2000b. The Future of Personnel Economics,
Economic Journal, 110(467), pp. F611-F639.
_____, 2000c. Performance Pay and Productivity,
American Economic Review, 90(5), pp. 13461361.
_____, 2008. personnel economics, The New Palgrave
Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
_____ and Michael Gibbs, 2009. 2nd ed. Personnel
Economics in Practice, Wiley. Description and preview.
Edward Lazear and Kathryn L. Shaw, 2007. Personnel Economics: The Economists View of Human Resources, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), pp.
91114.
Edward Lazear and Paul Oyer, 2009. Personnel Economics, draft of chapter to appear in R. Gibbons and D.
J. Roberts, ed., 2013,Handbook of Organizational Economics, Princeton University Press.
[19] Sherwin Rosen 1978. Substitution and Division of
Labour, Economica, 45(179), pp. 235250.
_____, 1982. Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings, Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), pp.
311323.
_____, 1986a. The Theory of Equalizing Dierences,
ch. 12, O. C. Ashenfelter and R. Layard, ed. Handbook
of Labor Economics, v. 1 , Elsevier, pp. 641692.
_____, 1986b. Prizes and Incentives in Elimination
Tournaments, American Economic Review, 76(4), pp.
701715.
[20] Edward Lazear, 1986. Salaries and Piece Rates, Journal
of Business, 59(3), pp. 405431.
[21] Robert Gibbons, 1987. Piece-Rate Incentive Schemes,
Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4, Part 1), pp. 413429.
[22] Edward P. Lazear and Sherwin Rosen, 1981. RankOrder Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), pp. 841864.
Sherwin Rosen, 1986b. Prizes and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments, American Economic Review, 76(4),
pp. 701715.
[23] Clive Bull, Andrew Schotter, and Keith Weigelt, 1987.
Tournaments and Piece Rates: An Experimental Study,
References
Blank, David M., and George J. Stigler, 1957. The
Demand and Supply of Scientic Personnel, NBER
& UMI. Chapter-preview links.
Hutchens, Robert M., 1989. Seniority, Wages and
Productivity: A Turbulent Decade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), pp. 4964.
Montgomery, James D., 1991. Social Networks
and Labor-Market Outcomes: Toward an Economic
Analysis, American Economic Review 81(5), pp.
14081418.
Shapiro, Carl, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1984. Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device, American Economic Review, 74(3), pp. 433
444.
REFERENCES
5.1
Text
5.2
Images
File:Emblem-money.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Emblem-money.svg License: GPL Contributors: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/GNOME-colors?content=82562 Original artist: perfectska04
5.3
Content license