Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A: Statement
A-A: Statement A's proof/evidence
A-A-A: Statement A-A's proof/evidence
A-A-B: Statement A-A's proof/evidence continued
A-A-C: Statement A-A's proof's/evidence's end
A-B: Statement A's proof/evidence continued
A-C: Statement A's proof/evidence continued
A-C-A: Statement A-C's proof/evidence
A-C-B: Statement A-C's proof's/evidence's end
A-D: Statement A's proof's/evidence's end
B: Next Statement
Calculating Existence
Assumptions made: A, G.
A: Things that exist must exist before, during and/or after other things or itself existing.
A-A: The consecutive and/or simultaneous ordering of events is assumed.
B: Time is made up of finitely divisible parts of time.
B-A: If time isn't made up of finitely divisible parts of time then time could be infinitely divided.
B-A-A: If time isn't made up of finitely divisible parts of time then time is made up of infinitely divisible
parts of time.
B-A-B: If time is made up of infinitely divisible parts of time then those infinitely divisible parts of time
that time is made up of can be divided infinitely since they are infinitely divisible.
B-A-C: If the infinitely divisible parts of time that time is made up of can be divided infinitely since they
are infinitely divisible then time could be infinitely divided.
B-B: If time could be infinitely divided then time couldn't exist.
B-B-A: If time could be infinitely divided then there would be an infinite amount of parts of time.
B-B-B: If there is an infinite amount of parts of time then in order for time to pass an infinite
amount of parts of time would have to also pass.
B-B-C: If in order for time to pass an infinite amount of parts of time would have to also pass
then time couldn't exist.
B-B-C-A: Time passes in a consecutive order of events (following one after another, example:
1,2,3).
B-B-C-B: If time passes in a consecutive order of events then the parts of time pass in a
consecutive order of events.
B-B-C-C: An infinite amount things passing in a consecutive order of events will never finish
passing.
B-B-C-C-A: An infinite amount of things is a never ending amount of things.
B-B-C-C-B: A never ending amount of things passing in a consecutive order of events
will never finish passing.
B-C: Time exists.
B-D: Time can not infinitely divided.
B-D-A: B-B + B-C.
B-E: Time is made up of finitely divisible parts of time.
B-E-A: B-B + B-C + B-D.
C: The amount of finitely divisible parts of time that have passed before the finitely divisible parts of time that are passing
in each moment of the present time is finite.
C-A: If the amount of finitely divisible parts of time that have passed before the finitely divisible parts of time that
are passing in each moment of the present were infinite then there could not be any finitely divisible parts of time
passing in each moment of the present.
C-A-A: If the amount of finitely divisible parts of time that have passed before the finitely divisible parts
of time that are passing in each moment of the present were infinite then there would be an an infinite
amount of finitely divisible parts of time that have passed before the present.
C-A-B: If there were an infinite amount of finitely divisible parts of time that have passed before the
present then an infinite amount of finitely divisible parts of time have passed.
C-A-C: An infinite amount of finitely divisible parts of time can not pass.
next to it.
L: The reason nothingness couldn't exist is because if nothingness did exist its existence would create the paradox of the
nothingness next to nothingness being an infinitely divisible distance away which is impossible.
L-A: It is impossible for the nothingness next to nothingness to be an infinitely divisible distance away because if it
were an infinitely divisible distance away then it would be an infinite distance away.
L-A-A: If a distance is infinitely divisible then there are an infinite amount of distances that must be
passed before the whole distance is passed.
L-A-A-A: An infinitely divisible distance means that there are an infinite amount of subdivisions
that distance.
L-A-B: If there are an infinite amount of distances that must be passed for the whole distance to be passed
then that distance would be an infinite distance away.
L-B: It is impossible for the nothingness next to nothingness to be an infinitely distance away because they are next
to each other.
M: Nothingness must have created two locations of awareness (referred to as points for simplicity's sake from now on)
separated by an indivisible distance.
M-A: L.
N: The two points must exist on a plane.
N-A: If there wasn't a plane that the two points existed on then the two points wouldn't be able to exist.
O: The plane the two points now have awareness of 360 degrees around them on the plane.
O-A: N.
P: The two points create points that are that same indivisible distance away that the two original points were from each
other from both of the two original points.
P-A: M + O.
Q: The two new points (not the original two points) are an irrational distance away from the point that is in the exact middle
of the two original points.
R: The two new points can't exist only on a plane because of the irrational distance away the two new points are from the
point in the exact middle of the two original points
S: The points that were formerly only on a plane must now be viewed from a 3 dimensional perspective in order to resolve
the issue of trying to accurately show an irrational distance on a plane when viewed from the perspective of only a plane.
T: At the same time as the perspective switched from only a plane to then a 3 dimensional perspective more points were
created that were that same indivisible distance away from at least two of all the points that already existed before this
process started.
U: Now that awareness of a 3 dimensional perspective is granted, any point that is that same indivisible distance away from
at least two of the points that already existed before this process started are created in a 3-dimensional perspective.