Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 7 April 2014
Received in revised form
17 March 2015
Accepted 18 March 2015
Available online 27 March 2015
The paper presents the study on possibilities of using green coffee beans (GCB) from Ethiopia, Kenya,
Brazil and Colombia as a functional additive. The dominant compound identied was 5-caffeoylquinic
acid. Caffeine content was comparable in all samples and averaged from 4.36 mg/g dw to 4.99 mg/
g dw. The grinding characteristics of GCB was studied and the sensory properties of bread enriched with
GCB our were evaluated. GCB was characterized by high grinding energy requirements. Phenolics
released during simulated digestion were highly bioavailable in vitro. Simulated digestion released
phytochemicals acting as chelating and reductive agents, free radical scavengers and lipid-preventers.
Results of a preliminary study concerning the proposed functional product indicate that phenolic
compounds from bread enriched with powdered GCB were highly mastication-extractable, which may
predict their high bioaccessibility and bioavailability. The content of phenolics was strongly correlated
with powdered GCB addition. The sensory characteristics linking results indicated that a partial
replacement of wheat our in bread with up to 3% ground GCB powder gives satisfactory overall consumer acceptability. Bread enriched with GCB possessed higher antiradical activity than control samples.
The results of our study clearly show that powdered GCB may be used directly, without extract preparation, for food supplementation.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Green coffee
Grinding
Functional food
Antioxidants
Bioaccessibility
1. Introduction
Current food production trends include not only the protection
of food components, but also the production of products with prohealth properties through the introduction of antioxidants (Maat
et al., 2005). Due to growing evidence that diets rich in phenols
and polyphenols may have potential health benets for consumers,
the nutritional supplement and food industries have developed
numerous products forticated with phenolics (Harland, 2000).
Recently, due to its unique composition and properties,
growing consumer interest has been directed towards green
coffee. Scientic studies have revealed that both bioactive components of coffee (phenolic acids and caffeine) play a preventive
692
During roasting, there is a progressive destruction and transformation of CGAs with some 8e10% being lost for every 1% loss of
dry matter (Clifford, 1999). Thus, GCB seem to be a better source of
these compounds.
The particle size distribution and size reduction of ground material determine the properties of the nal product and the inuence of many processes such as mixing, extraction, kneading or
baking. The extractability of bioactive compounds strongly depends
on solvents and the degree of neness. This is the reason why
grinding is a very important process in the food industry. There is
no information in the literature concerning the grinding characteristics of GCB. The production of plant extracts is usually costly
and requires energy inputs; some concerns have also been raised
about the safety of their use. A denitely cheaper and, according to
some, safer method is to enrich food products with less processed
supplements. Thus, we examined the potential bioaccessibility and
bioavailability of antioxidative compounds derived directly from
ground GCB based on an in vitro gastrointestinal model. In vitro
models based on human physiology were elaborated as simple,
cheap and repeatable tools for the study of food component bioaccessibility. These are widely used for the study of structural
changes, digestibility and food component release in simulated
alimentary tract conditions (Oomen et al., 2002).
Thus, the aim of this study was an estimation of the potential
possibilities of using ground coffee beans as a functional additive.
The grinding characteristics of GCB were also studied and the
sensory properties of bread enriched with GCB were evaluated.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Chemicals
Ferrozine (3-(2-pyridyl)-5,6-bis-(4-phenyl-sulfonic acid)-1,2,4triazine), ABTS (2,2ediphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) a-amylase,
pancreatin, pepsin (from porcine stomach mucosa, pepsin A, EC
3.4.23.1), bile extract, FolineCiocalteu reagent, linoleic acid,
ammonium thiocyanate, hemoglobin, pepsin, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, sinapinic acid, ferulic acid, benzoic acid, quercetin,
kaempferol, and PBS (phosphate buffered saline, 0.01 mol/L phosphate buffer, 0.0027 mol/L potassium chloride and 0.137 mol/L
sodium chloride, pH 7.4, at 25 C.) were purchased from Sigmae
Aldrich Company (Poznan, Poland). All others chemicals were of
analytical grade.
2.2. Material
Green coffee (Coffea arabica) beans (GCB) derived from various
plantation (from Ethiopia, Kenya, Brazil and Colombia) were obtained from company CofeinaeRomuald Zalewski, Marki, Poland.
The initial moisture content of GCB ranged from 8.7 g/100 g to 9.0 g/
100 g wet basis (w.b.).
2.3. The grinding process
The samples of GCB were prepared by adding water to adjust
moisture content to 10 g/100 g (w.b.) and storing for 48 h. The
beans of individual coffee samples were ground using the laboratory hammer mill (POLYMIX-Micro-Hammermill MFC, Kinematica.
AG, Littau/Lucerne, Switzerland) equipped with round holes
3.0 mm. The detailed procedure of grinding method and grinding
equipment was described by Dziki, Cacak-Pietrzak, Mis, Jonczyk,
and Gawlik-Dziki (2014). The specic grinding energy (Er) was
determined as the ratio of the grinding energy to the mass of the
material taken for grinding. The sieving test was used to determine
the particle size distribution of the pulverized material. Sieving was
was used for acquisition and data processing. The samples were
separated on a BEH C18 column (100 mm 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 mm,
Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), which was maintained at 40 C.
The ow rate was adjusted to 0.40 mL/min. The following solvent
system: mobile phase A (0.1 mL/100 mL formic acid in Milli-Q
water, v/v) and mobile phase B (0.1 mL/100 mL formic acid in
MeCN, v/v) was applied. The gradient program was as follows:
0e1.0 min, 5% B; 1.0e24.0 min, 5e50% B; 24.0e25.0 min, 50e95% B;
25.0e27.0 min, 95% B; 27.0e27.1 min, 95-5% B; 27.1e30.0 min, 5% B.
Samples were kept at 8 C in the sample manager. The injection
volume of the sample was 2.0 mL (full loop mode) and samples were
analyzed in triplicate. Strong needle wash solution (95:5, methanolewater, v/v) and weak needle wash solution (5:95, acetonitrileewater, v/v) were used. The detection wavelength was set at
250 nm for caffeine and 325 for phenolic acids at a 5 point/s rate, at
3.6 nm resolution. The separation was completed in 30 min. Peaks
were assigned on the basis of their UV spectra, mass to charge ratio
(m/z) and ESI-MS/MS fragmentation patterns. Chlorogenic acid (5caffeoyl-quinic acid) was used as a group standard for determination of phenolic compounds. The MS analyses were carried out on a
TQD mass spectrometer (Waters Corp.) equipped with a Z-spray
electrospray interface. The following instrumental parameters
were used for ESI-MS analysis of phenolic compounds (negative
ionization mode): capillary voltage, 2.8 kV; cone voltage, 40 V;
desolvation gas, N2 800 L/h; cone gas, N2 100 L/h; source temp.
140 C, desolvation temp. 350 C. Compounds were analyzed in full
scan mode (mass range of 100e1600 amu was scanned).
Total phenolics (TPC) content was estimated according to
Singleton and Rossi (1965) and calculated as a gallic acid (GAE)
equivalent (mg/g dw).
2.5.2. Analyses of antioxidant activities of extracts
Inhibition of lipid peroxidation (LPO) was performed according
to Kuo, Yeh, and Pan (1999). For antiradical activity (AA) analyses,
the improved ABTS decolorisation assay was performed (Re et al.,
1999). Chelating (CHEL) and ferric reducing antioxidant power
(FRAP) was determined according to the methods described by
Guo, Lee, Chiang, Lin, and Chang (2001) and Oyaizu (1986),
respectively. Antioxidant activities were expressed as EC50 (Efcient Concentration): the amount of sample (mg dry weight, dw)
needed to obtain 50% activity per 1.0 mL of the initial solution.
2.6. Bread preparation and sensory evaluation
The our used in the formula of control bread (C) was wheat
bread our (600 g), type 750 (average 0.75 g/100 g ash content,
humidity 14 g/100 g). The our was replaced with GCB our (particles of ground CGB from Brazil < 0.2 mm; based of the highest BAV
values) at 1 g/100 g, 2 g/100 g, 3 g/100 g, 4 g/100 g, 5 g/100 g levels
(GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4 and GC5, respectively). Besides this 6 g of
instant yeast and 12 g of salt were used for dough preparation. The
general quantity of water necessary for the preparation of the
dough was established through the marking of water absorption
properties in our of a consistency of 350 Brabender units. The
batches of dough were mixed in a spiral mixer for 6 min. After
fermentation, the pieces of dough (300 g) were put into an oven
heated up to a temperature of 230 C. The baking time was 30 min.
After baking, the bread was left to stand for 24 h at room temperature. Sensory evaluation was carried out on bread samples with
the different percentages of GCB. Subsequently, the samples were
sliced (slices about 1.5 cm thick), coded with a number and served
to untrained consumers. The panel consisted of 33 consumers
(24e45 years old; 21 women and 12 man), who evaluated the
bread's crumb color, aroma, texture, taste overall acceptability. This
hedonic test was used to determine the degree of overall liking for
693
694
the groups were estimated using the Tukey test. Statistical tests
were evaluated using Statistica 6.0 software (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa,
USA). All the statistical tests were carried out at a signicance level
of a 0.05.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Grinding results
The particle size distributions of ground GCB are given in Table 1.
For all samples, the highest mass fraction was obtained for coarse
particles: 1.0e1.6 mm. The share of this fraction ranged from 50.7%
(GCB from Kenya) to 58.3% (sample from Ethiopia). The highest
mass fraction of the smallest particles (<0.2 mm) was obtained for
Kenyan coffee samples (average 13.5%) and the lowest in the case of
ground Colombian coffee (average 4.6%). In the case of cereal grains,
the amount of the ne fraction correlated with grain hardness. In
particular, soft wheat kernels are characterized by a lower degree of
adhesion between starch granules and the protein matrix and thus
a higher mass fraction of ne particles is produced (Greffeuille
et al., 2006). Analyzing the grinding pattern of size reduced GCB,
this is quite different from ground cereal grain obtained in the same
grinding conditions (Dziki, 2008, 2011), especially in terms of the
mass fraction of coarse particles. The average particle size (d) of
ground GCB ranged from 0.95 mm (Kenyan coffee) to 1.05 mm
(Ethiopian coffee). However, signicant differences were found
only between d for Kenyan samples and other samples.
There is no information in the literature concerning the grinding
characteristics of green coffee. Most studies in to the size reduction
process of coffee are devoted to a study of the grinding process of
roasted beans and especially the inuence of particle size and
particle uniformity after grinding on coffee extraction. Ephraim
(2007) reported that the key to good roasted coffee brewing is
good coffee grinding, which is obtained by optimizing the extraction of the soluble solids into the hot brewing water. Baggenstoss,
Thomann, Perren, and Escher (2008) found that the water content of roasted coffee inuenced grinding behavior, extraction, and
~ a, and Cid (2003)
aroma retention dynamics. Andueza, de Pen
showed that grinding roasted CB is a critical step in the preparation of espresso coffee. Baggenstoss, Thomann, Perren, and Escher
(2010) studied the aroma recovery from roasted coffee by wet
grinding. They found that a two-step process involving cold wet
grinding and subsequent hot extraction in a closed system
increased the yield of aroma compounds in the resulting coffee
compared to conventionally ground coffee. The results of grinding
energy requirements showed that Er ranged from 73.3 kJ kg1
Fig. 1. The grinding energy indices of green coffee beans. e specic grinding energy
(Er), e grinding efciency index (Ef), e Sokoowski's grinding index (K); B e Brazil,
C e Colombia, E e Ethiopia, K e Kenya; the values are expressed as mean SD (n 9);
means with different letter superscript are signicantly different (a < 0.05).
Table 1
Particle size distribution (%) and the average particle size of the GCBa samples.
Range of class, mm
Sample
Brazil
>1.6
1.0e1.6
0.8e1.0
0.63e0.8
0.5e0.63
0.4e0.5
0.315e0.4
0.2e0.315
<0.2
dc [mm]
3.4
53.1
16.9
9.7
3.0
1.4
2.0
4.0
6.4
1.02
Colombia
0.11Ab
1.72A
0.42B
0.32B
0.16B
0.10A
0.17C
0.27D
0.33D
0.011B
4.8
51.4
16.4
6.6
2.9
2.9
1.8
8.7
4.6
1.01
0.18B
2.78A
0.32B
0.25A
0.08B
0.16B
0.11BC
0.33B
0.27B
0.018B
Ethiopia
4.4
58.3
11.7
9.8
2.5
1.1
1.6
2.8
7.8
1.05
0.21C
1.23B
0.48C
0.21B
0.18A
0.06C
0.14B
0.26C
0.29C
0.012B
Kenya
3.4
50.7
14.1
6.5
2.6
1.5
2.5
5.2
13.5
0.95
0.15A
2.21A
0.36A
0.18A
0.12A
0.09A
0.13A
0.28A
0.65A
0.014A
695
presented here, powdered GCBs are excellent sources of antioxidative compounds with multidirectional activity. Irrespective of
GCB source, simulated digestion of GCB released phytochemicals
acting as chelating and reductive agents, free radical scavengers
and lipid-preventers (Table 3). The highest capacity for metal ions
chelation was determined for GCB from Brazil (EC50 2.07 mg dw/
mL), whereas the lowest for GCB from Ethiopia (EC50 7.01 mg dw/
mL).
Most importantly, active compounds were bioavailable in the
model system. The activity of extracts obtained after simulated
absorption was signicantly higher than that determined for
samples obtained after simulated digestion. Especially high
bioavailability was determined for GCB derived from Ethiopia
(BAV 7.14). Particularly noteworthy is the fact that GCBs were an
excellent source of potentially bioaccessible reductive compounds.
EC50 values ranged from 0.97 mg dw/mL to 2.32 mg dw/mL for
GCBs from Kenya and Brazil, respectively. Activities of extracts
obtained after simulated absorption were comparable with those
determined for extracts after digestion. This fact may indicate a
potential high bioavailability of active compounds, which was
additionally conrmed by BAV values. Relatively low bioavailability
was found only in the case of reductive compounds released for
Kenyan GCBs (BAV 0.42). The present results conrmed those
obtained by Farah, Monteiro, Donangelo, and Lafay (2008) which
proved that CQA and diCQA (major CGA compounds in coffee) are
highly bioavailable in humans and are differentially absorbed and/
or metabolized throughout the whole gastrointestinal tract. However, Stalmach, Williamson, and Crozier (2014) showed trends towards a reduced bioavailability of chlorogenic acids associated with
the highest dose ingested, when expressed as percentages of
intake.
The antiradical activity of samples obtained after digestion
in vitro of powdered GCB was comparable and averaged about 4 mg
dw/mL. The potential bioavailability of antiradical compounds
differed signicantly. The highest activity was found for Brazilian
GCB whereas the lowest was found for GCB from Colombia. Low
bioavailability of antiradical compounds from Colombian GCB was
conrmed by BAV values (0.52). In other cases their values averaged
about 1.
The ability to prevent lipids against oxidation determined for
extracts obtained after simulated digestion was relatively low (in
comparison to other activities). Probably, this is because lipophilic
compounds are less extractable in the gastrointestinal model system used. Activity averaged from 30.01 to 16.06 mg dw/mL. Most
importantly, the potential bioavailability of these phytochemicals
was surprisingly high. The activity of extracts obtained after
Table 2
Qualitative-quantitative analysis of phytochemicals of coffee derived from various plantations (n 9).
No.
Compound
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3-CQAa
5-CQA
Caffeine
4-CQA and 3-FQA
5-pCoQA
5-FQA
3,4-diCQA
3,5-diCQA
4,5-diCQA
Colombia
0.22Ab
3.11AC
0.12AB
0.21A
0.02A
0.11A
0.21A
0.28A
0.18A
2.61
27.64
4.40
4.03
0.79
4.14
0.63
1.79
0.68
0.24B
3.91B
0.38A
0.33B
0.12B
0.42A
0.41AB
0.13B
0.07B
Ethiopia
1.62
30.86
4.36
2.98
0.75
4.32
0.45
2.45
0.43
Kenya
0.19C
3.82AB
0.11A
0.30C
0.03B
0.33A
0.11C
0.62A
0.12C
2.95
39.92
4.99
4.92
1.00
5.48
0.82
2.98
0.90
0.29A
4.69C
0.32B
0.49A
0.10A
0.52B
0.22AB
0.41A
0.19A
696
300
e
250
cd
cd
200
cd
cd
150
100
50
Coffee source
Fig. 2. Total phenolic contents in extracts from powdered green coffee beans.
chemical extract (CE),
e digested in vitro (DE),
e absorbed in vitro (ABE); B e Brazil, C e
Colombia, E e Ethiopia, K e Kenya; the values are expressed as mean SD (n 9); means with different letter superscript are signicantly different (a < 0.05).
1,60
1,40
1,20
b
ab
a
1,00
0,80
a
b
0,60
a
a
0,40
0,20
0,00
E
Coffee source
Fig. 3. Comparison of potential bioaccessibility and bioavailability of phenolic compounds from powdered green coffee beans (n 9). B e Brazil, C e Colombia, E e Ethiopia, K e
Kenya; e the relative phenolics bioaccessibility index (RBC), e the relative phenolics bioavailability index (RBV),
e the phenolics bioavailability index (PAV); means with
different letter superscript (within the index) are signicantly different (a < 0.05).
697
Table 3
Bioaccessibility and bioavailability in vitro of antioxidants from powdered green coffee beans.
Activity
Coffee samples
Chelating power
Brazil
Colombia
Ethiopia
Kenya
Brazil
Colombia
Ethiopia
Kenya
Brazil
Colombia
Ethiopia
Kenya
Brazil
Colombia
Ethiopia
Kenya
2.07
3.34
7.01
3.65
2.32
0.99
1.85
0.97
3.76
3.76
4.11
3.67
17.71
16.06
16.64
30.01
Reducing power
Antiradical activity
Ability to lipids
prevention
0.09aaAb
0.79bA
1.90cA
1.01bA
0.13aA
0.10bA
0.34cA
0.10bA
0.18aA
0.13aA
0.37bA
0.10aA
1.81aA
0.74bA
1.45bA
2.34cA
0.56
1.27
0.98
1.48
0.93
1.03
1.50
2.30
2.99
7.25
4.75
3.95
8.33
6.34
7.29
5.74
0.13aB
0.55bB
0.50cB
0.59bB
0.54aB
0.01bA
0.85bA
1.10cB
1.20aB
3.20bB
0.63cA
1.58dA
0.72aB
0.27bB
2.73cB
0.27bB
Bioavailability
(BAV) factor
3.71
2.63
7.14
2.47
2.48
0.96
1.23
0.42
1.26
0.52
0.86
0.93
2.13
2.53
2.28
5.23
was a little greener than that of the control bread. However, it had a
slight negative inuence on bread acceptability. The taste, aroma
and overall acceptability of bread at substitution levels of 1e3% had
the highest linking score. Generally higher levels of GCB addition
caused a less acceptable aroma and taste. For texture characteristics, no statistically signicant differences were observed in any
samples. The sensory characteristics linking results indicated that a
partial replacement of wheat our in bread with up to 3 g/100 g
ground GCB powder gives satisfactory overall consumer acceptability (on average more than 7 points on 9 maximum possible).
However, bread which contained 4 g/100 g and 5 g/100 g GCB was
rated comparatively lower (below 7 points), which is due to
excessive amounts of GCB compounds which negatively affected
the aroma and taste of products.
Although traditional bread uses only four ingredients, most
recipes also add some sweetener, some oil, multiple types of our,
seeds, and other bread additives which can improve the nutritional
and nutraceutical value of bread. The biological advantages of
chlorogenic acid and ferulic acids appear useful for the development of functional foods, which could contribute to a healthy diet.
It must be taken into account, however, that any functional substance that is effective on its own (in vitro or in vivo) may have
different or no effects when it becomes an ingredient in food.
Therefore, it is necessary to investigate not only the single agent but
also the whole food (Glei, Kirmse, Habermann, Persin, & PoolZobel, 2006). Another aspect of our research is the potential usage of GCB for obesity treatment. A variety of natural products,
Table 4
Sensory evaluation of bread prepared by the substitution of wheat our with GCB.a
GCB addition, [g/100 g]
Sensory evaluation
Crumb color
C
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
8.5
8.4
8.2
8.3
7.9
6.8
Ab
0.38
0.26AB
0.34AB
0.42AB
0.42BC
0.31C
Aroma
8.8
8.4
7.8
6.8
6.0
5.8
Texture
A
0.38
0.54AB
0.29B
0.61C
0.60D
0.56D
7.8
7.6
7.9
7.8
7.6
7.3
Taste
A
0.24
0.48A
0.42A
0.69A
0.58A
0.37A
8.4
8.2
7.5
6.2
5.7
5.2
Overall
A
0.42
0.40A
0.66AB
0.44BC
0.58CD
0.39D
8.4
8.2
7.9
7.3
6.8
6.3
0.42A
0.53A
0.61AB
0.35BC
0.28C
0.45C
a
GCB e green coffee beans, nine-point hedonic scale of sensory evaluation with 1, 5 and 9 representing extremely dislike, neither like nor dislike, and extremely like,
respectively.
b
Means with different letter superscript within a same column are signicantly different (a < 0.05).
c
C e control bread, GC1eGC5, wheat bread with 1e5 g/100 g of powdered GCB addition, respectively.
698
A
12
f
10
f
R = 0.987
8
d
6
b
R = 0.995
c
c
b
a
2
0
C
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
Sample
80
B
a
70
a
60
R = 0.883
50
b
40
30
R = 0.865
20
GC4
GC5
10
0
GC1
GC2
GC3
Sample
Fig. 4. Inuence of powdered green coffee beans addition on total phenolics content (A) and antiradical activity (B) of wheat bread. chemical extract (CE),
e buffer extract (BE),
the values are expressed as mean SD (n 9); means with different letter superscript (within the extract) are signicantly different (a < 0.05); C e control bread, GC1eGC5, wheat
bread with 1e5 g/100 g of powdered green coffee beans addition, respectively.
mayonnaise. Glei et al. (2006) demonstrated that the supplementation of bread with 1% commercial green coffee extract resulted in
enhanced chemopreventive in vitro properties in comparison with
normal bread. Enriched bread contains more chlorogenic acid and
has a higher antioxidant activity than normal bread. These properties were associated with an increased resistance of colon and
liver cells against H2O2-mediated genotoxicity, which is an important mechanism of chemoprotection. However, in the recent literature there is a lack of ndings regarding the usefulness of whole
powdered GCB in food fortication.
Potential functional properties of proposed products may be
supported by caffeine. Caffeine's mechanism of lipolytic action
might be due to its binding to the phospholipid phosphate groups
and the subsequent interactions between the lipase and triglyceride portions of lipid droplets, eliciting lipolysis (Han, Takaku, Li,
699
Greffeuille, V., Abecassis, J., Rousset, M., Oury, F.-X., Faye, A., Bar L'Helgouac'h, C.,
et al. (2006). Grain characterization and milling behaviour of near-isogenic lines
differing by hardness. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114, 1e12.
Guo, J.-T., Lee, H.-L., Chiang, S.-H., Lin, H.-I., & Chang, C.-Y. (2001). Antioxidant
properties of the extracts from different parts of broccoli in Taiwan. Journal of
Food and Drug Analysis, 9, 96e101.
Halliwell, B. (2001). Role of free radicals in the neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic implications for antioxidant treatment. Drugs & Aging, 18, 685e716.
Han, L. K., Takaku, T., Li, J., Kimura, Y., & Okuda, H. (1999). Anti-obesity action of
oolong tea. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 23,
98e105.
Harland, B. F. (2000). Caffeine and nutrition. Nutrition, 16, 522e526.
Igho, O., Rohini, T., & Edzard, E. (2011). The use of green coffee extract as a weight
loss supplement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical
trials. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 31, 1e6.
Kuo, J.-M., Yeh, D.-B., & Pan, B. (1999). Rapid photometric assay evaluating antioxidative activity in edible plant material. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 47, 3206e3209.
Lim, H. S., Park, S. H., Ghafoor, K., Hwang, S. Y., & Park, J. (2011). Quality and antioxidant property of bread containing turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) cultivated in
South Korea. Food Chemistry, 112, 1577e1582.
Maat, J., Rossi, D., Babuchowsk,i, A., Beekmans, F., Castenmiller, J., Fenwick, R., et al.
(2005). European technology platform on food for life. The vision for 2020 and
beyond. Downloaded from http:platformazywnosci.pl/pliki/BAT_Brochure_ETP.
pdf. on 23.01.13.
Narita, Y., & Inouye, K. (2011). Inhibitory effects of chlorogenic acids from green
coffee beans and cinnamate derivatives on the activity of porcine pancreas aamylase isozyme I. Food Chemistry, 127, 1532e1539.
Oomen, A. G., Hack, A., Minekus, M., Zeijdner, E., Cornelis, C., Schoeters, G., et al.
(2002). Comparison of ve in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environmental Science and Technology, 36,
3326e3334.
Oyaizu, M. (1986). Studies on products of browning reaction e antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Japanese
Journal of Nutrition, 4, 307e315.
Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., & Rice-Evans, C. (1999).
Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization
assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 6, 1231e1237.
Sato, Y., Itagaki, S., Kurokawa, T., Ogura, J., Kobayashi, M., Hirano, T., et al. (2011).
In vitro and in vivo antioxidant properties of chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 403, 136e138.
Shimoda, H., Seki, E., & Aitani, M. (2006). Inhibitory effect of green coffee bean
extract on fat accumulation and body weight gain in mice. BMC Complementary
and Alternative Medicine, 17, 6e9.
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicephosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and
Viticulture, 16, 144e158.
Sokoowski, M. (1996). Energy consumed in grinding e a new idea of a general law
of comminution e new tests stands and testing results. R
ecents Progress en
G
enie Proc
ed
es, 10, 221e226.
Stalmach, A., Williamson, G., & Crozier, A. (2014). Impact of dose on the bioavailability of coffee chlorogenic acid in humans. Food and Function, 5, 1727e1737.
Yun, J. W. (2010). Possible anti-obesity therapeutics from nature e a review.
Phytochemistry, 71, 1625e1641.