Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Article views: 33
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, 2015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2014.999289
Laboratoire MAP5, UMR CNRS 8145, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France; bLaboratoire LIASD, EA 4383, IUT de Montreuil,
Universite Paris 8, Saint-Denis, France
(Received 5 February 2014; accepted 13 December 2014)
The trabecular bone is a complex random network of interconnected rods and plates. Its trabecular structure is constantly
remodelling to ensure a maintenance function. A simulated bone remodelling process was discussed in a previous study
based on a BMU germ-grain model where type and orientation of local structure related to mechanical stress were not
considered. In this study, we explore the potential ability of a 3D-skeleton coupled with a statistical tensor analysis to locally
describe the trabecular structure for binary images. In order to add new constraints for BMU validation and BMU-shape
characterisation in the simulator, we propose a strategy using inertia tensors based on the skeleton ensuring the feasibility of
the entire process.
Keywords: bone remodelling process; simulation; 3D-skeleton; inertia tensor
1. Introduction
The trabecular bone is a porous tissue, which is a network
of interconnected rods and plates. This type of bone is a
highly anisotropic structure that adapts to main direction
stress. Regarding trabecular bone, remodelling has three
functions (Parfitt 2002). First, a maintenance function to
repair fatigue damage which occurs during normal
activity. In response to mechanical stress induced by
external strains, microdamage appears as linear microcracks and diffuse damage. Second, a resistance function:
formation of new bone as a reaction to mechanical stress.
Third, remodelling has a metabolic function to maintain
calcium homeostasis by promoting calcium exchange on
the bone surface (Parfitt 1993). Trabecular remodelling
activity takes place in compact surface saucer-shaped
areas known as bone multicellular units (BMUs). The
BMU remodelling process consists of three main
successive phases, which are activation, resorption and
formation. Activation involves recruitment of osteoclast
precursors and their fusion into osteoclast cells. Following
activation, the resorption phase is carried out by these
osteoclasts that attach and progress on the surface.
Formation is handled by osteoblasts which deposit osteoid
and mineralise it, thus actually forming new bone. Certain
osteoblasts are encapsulated in the osteoid matrix and
transform into cells known as osteocytes, while remaining
osteoblasts continue to synthesise bone until they
eventually transform into quiescent lining cells that
cover the newly formed bone surface. The BMU
remodelling process is thought to have targeted and nontargeted components which were summarised by Burr
(2002) and (Parfitt (2002) as follows. A portion of the
remodelling process aims at replacing fatigue-microdamaged bone resulting from mechanical stress. Initiation of
such damage repair is dependent upon osteocyte cells
encapsuled in the bone matrix known to act as mechanical
sensors through a network which may be damaged locally
as a result of mechanical stress. However, a substantial
portion (approx. 70%) of the entire remodelling process
does not target this specific purpose. Certain BMUs could
be targeted for removing more fragile hyper-mineralised
bone and serve as fatigue prevention while simultaneously
providing calcium. Initially targeted BMUs could continue
to progress beyond their target. Finally, the origination of
some BMUs could be a non-targeted stochastic process.
The two last mechanisms could result from the influence
of systemic agents such as estrogen and thyroid hormones.
There are currently many remodelling simulation
models which essentially focus on mechanical influence
by using finite-element (FE) methods that measure (SED)
(Hambli et al. 2011, 2013; Marinozzi et al. 2014; Hambli
2014b). Some of these remodelling processes focus
exclusively on structure adaptive change (Wang et al.
2012; Hambli 2014a). Other models integrate microdamage remodelling by taking osteocyte potential for local
remodelling initiation into account. Osteocyte cells which
are encapsulated in the bone matrix are known to act as
mechanical sensors (Robling et al. 2006; Hambli and
Rieger 2011; Rieger et al. 2011). One of the reference
model discussed in Ruimerman et al. (2005) includes
osteocytes. In this model, SED is used to drive a BMUlevel remodelling process where osteoclast and osteoblast
activities are coupled. Locations for osteoclasts to be
activated are chosen randomly on the trabecular bone
Table 1.
Skyscan-1072 parameters.
Volume
V A V plate
V B V rod
3582 499
4082 408
86
64
34
13
9.5
22
DA
0.02 2.18
1.18 1.43
2.
Figure 1.
Entire volumes.
Vplate
Vrod
(b)
Vplate
Figure 2.
Vrod
AFjSj
OFjSjs:
WR
<X i % 1i :
However, locations for germs cannot be chosen purely
randomly, meaning uniformly on S. As previously
mentioned, osteocytes encapsulated in the bone matrix
and lining surface cells play a prevalent role in the
biological process. Their signal or lack of signal is likely to
ensure that surface areas which have just been remodelled
are not of primary importance. To this purpose, an
activation energy is calculated at a BMU level. We note
Mx; 1 the state of the mineralised bone matrix for a given
BMU. It is a set of voxel values simply expressed as the
age from last formation. For each new proposed BMU,
validation is acted when average of age voxels in the grain
1 is up a threshold depending on a parameter k:
1 . tk :
Mx;
This threshold tk corresponds to the percentile estimated
for a percentage k. Taken as a global parameter k is thus
related to the fact that the process is more or less targeted
Figure 5.
Skz visualisation for sub-volumes composed of 50 z-slices, V rod (top) and V plate (bottom).
Table 2.
Eigenvalue conditions
Linear (L)
Planar (P)
Isotropic (I)
0 l3 l2 p l1
0 l3 p l2 l1
0 , l3 l2 l1
2.4
Class
Structure
Rod or edge
Plate
Junction
(a)
0.8
(b)
0.7
0.7
0.7
(c)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
mL =
12
mP =
23
mI =
3
1
Figure 7. Visualisation on a 3D-skeleton of the three membership functions. From left to right: mL , mP and mI . Comprised between 0
and 1, their values are coloured from dark blue to dark red.
(a)
(b)
Vrod
Figure 8.
Vplate
Hard classification visualisation: blue for L, green for P and red for I.
Figure 9. Relation between surface voxel x (black voxel) and skeleton voxel set (Lx ) with hard classification and associated direction for
involved skeleton voxels. Smoothed Skz in grey, smoothed surface in blue for a neighbourhood of voxel x.
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
m(linear)
Figure 10. An example of membership functions mL ; mP values. Colours are corresponding to hard classification: blue for linear, green
for planar and red for junctions.
3. Results
First, the simulator was implemented in different contexts
using the actual selected volumes. Volume evolution is
monitored by the relative-volume parameter and the Euler
number (x) which is a connectivity parameter. x is a
500
500
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,500
2,000
2,000
2,500
0
10
12
10
12
10
12
1
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0
6
Vplate
10
12
Vrod
Figure 11. For entire volumes: evolution of parameters in function of the iteration number (k). Euler number (top) and relative volume
(V k =V 0 ) (bottom). Blue curves for the targeted process (a 50%, k 85%) and red curves for the less targeted process (a 50%,
k 40%).
Figure 12. Evolution using the simulator for V plate (left) and V rod (right). Skz skeleton behaviour and tensor hard voxel-classification
behaviour. Blue lines: directions for linear classified voxels, green smoothed surface for planar classified voxels, red voxels for
intersection classified voxels. Initial sub-volumes (top) and final sub-volumes (bottom).
10
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Eric Lespessailles and Dr
Claude-Laurent Benhamou from IPROS-I3MTO laboratory in
Orleans (France). We are also grateful to Jerome Touvier for his
invaluable help.
Note
1.
http://www.univ-orleans.fr/i3mto
References
Almhdie-Imjabbe A, Hambli R, Rozenbaum O, Touvier J,
Lespessailles E, Jennane R. 2014. Mechanical assessment of
trabecular bone stiffness using hybrid skeleton and finite
element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng.
doi:10.108021681163.2014.944355.
Burr D. 2002. Targeted and nontargeted remodeling. Bone.
30(1):2 4.
Goff MG, Slyfield CR, Kummari SR, Tkachenko EV, Fischer SE,
Yi YH, Jekir M, Keaveny TM, Hernandez CJ. 2012. Threedimensional characterization of resorption cavity size and
location in human vertebral trabecular bone. Bone.
51(1):28 37.
Hambli R. 2014a. Connecting mechanics and bone cell activities
in the bone remodeling process: an integrated finite element
modeling. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2(6):1 12.
Hambli R. 2014b. 3D finite element simulation of human
proximal femoral fracture under quasi-static load. Adv
Bioeng Appl. 1(1):1 14.
Hambli R, Katerchi H, Benhamou C. 2011. Multiscale
methodology for bone remodelling simulation using coupled
finite element and neural network computation. J Mech
Behav Biomed Mater. 10:133 145.
Hambli R, Lespessailles E, Benhamou C. 2013. Integrated
remodeling-to-fracture finite element model of human
proximal femur behaviour. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
(17):89 106.
Hambli R, Rieger R. 2011. Physiologically based mathematical
model of transduction of mechanobiological signals by
osteocytes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 11:83 93.
Hernandez C, Hazelwood S, Martin R. 1999. The relationship
between basic multicellular unit activation and origination in
cancellous bone. Bone. 25(5):585 587.
Marinozzi F, Bini F, De Paolis A, Zuppante F, Bedini R,
Marinozzi A. 2014. A finite element analysis of altered load
distribution within femoral head in osteoarthritis. Comput
Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imag Vis. 10:1 7.
11