Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
org/fwr
*1
1
snehaldshukla@gmail.com; 2gm.deheri@rediffmaim.com
*1
Abstract
An endeavor has been made to study and analyze the effect
of slip velocity on the performance of a squeeze film in
porous rough infinitely long parallel plates in the presence of
a magnetic fluid lubricant. The Neuringer-Rosensweig
model governs the fluid flow while the velocity slip is
modeled by the method of Beavers and Joseph. A stochastic
random variable with nonzero mean, variance, and skewness
characterizes the random roughness of the bearing surfaces.
With the adding of suitable boundary conditions, the
associated stochastically averaged Reynolds equation is
solved to obtain the fluid pressure, in turn, which results in
the calculation of the load-carrying capacity. It is found that
although the bearing suffers owing to transverse surface
roughness, the performance of the bearing system can be
improved to some extent by the positive effect of
magnetization, considering the slip parameter at the
minimum, at least in the case of negatively-skewed
roughness. A comparison of this study with some
established investigations indicates that the reduction of
load-carrying capacity due to porosity and slip velocity is
comparatively less here especially, when negative variance
occurs.Of course, in augmenting the performance of the
bearing system, the aspect ratio plays a central role even if
the slip parameter is at the minimum. This article offers the
suggestions that for a better performance of the bearing
system, the slip velocity should be minimized, even if the
magnetic strength has been chosen suitably. It is established
that the bearing can support a load even in the absence of
flow, unlike the case of a conventional lubricant.
Keywords
Parallel Plate Slider Bearing; Magnetic Fluid; Roughness; Slip
Velocity; Porosity; Load Carrying Capacity
Introduction
A slider bearing is the simplest and frequently
www.seipub.org/fwr
www.seipub.org/fwr
(.
) = + 2 + 0 (.
. = 0
=0
=
+
) = 0
. (
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
0 2
+ 2
2
(6)
1
2
0 2 is
32
2
1
(8)
( ) = 35
2
0,
elsewhere
www.seipub.org/fwr
formis found to be
where
= ( ),
= [( )2 ],
= [( )3 ],
2
(9)
() = ( ) (10)
H2
B2
6 dh
P 0=
(2 2 sh 3s 2 h 2 ) (
x 2 ) (11)
a (h) dt
2
4
Where
a (h) = h3 + 3 h 2 + 3( 2 + a 2 )h + + 3 2 + 3 + 12 H ,
which is just 3 + 12in the case of smooth bearings.
= 0 , at = and = (13)
2
2
Introducing the dimensionless quantities
0 kh3
x
h3
*
P
u
=
=
, P*
,
,
2
B
h
hB
L *
s* sh
=
=
=
=
,
,
, *
, (14)
3
B
h
h
a ( h)
H
A(h)
=
, *
,=
,
* =
3
h
h
h3
and substituting, one obtains the expression for
pressure distribution in dimensionless form as:
x*
=
60.25( )2 22 +3
()
3
4
= (0.25 ( )2 )
(15)
= 2 (16)
5
24
5 22 3
()
(17)
(18)
2
While Equation (17) establishesthat the nondimensional load carrying capacity gets enhanced by
5
(19)
24
as compared to the case of conventional lubricant. It is
manifested that the expression for the load carrying
capacity is linear with respect to the magnetization
parameter and hence the dimensionless load carrying
capacity increases with increasing magnetization
parameter as shown in FIG. (2)-(7). The magnetization
results in an improvedperformance because it
increases the viscosity of the lubricant leading to an
increase in pressure; thus,giving increased load
carrying capacity. Besides, the expression for nondimensional pressure distribution indicates that slip
velocity of the bearing significantly distorts the profile
of pressure distribution.
www.seipub.org/fwr
0.44
W*
W*
0.455
0.435
0.365
0.29
0.415
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.215
0.2
*
*=0.5
*=0.2
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=0.1
*=0
*=0.0001
*=0.01
*=0.1
*=0.001
W*
*=0
*=0.15
0.05
0.4525
0.4275
0.4025
0.5125
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
W*
0.4875
0.4625
0.4375
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=-0.05
*=0.05
*=0.1
s*=0.31
s*=0.33
s*=0.34
s*=0.32
*=0
w*
*=-0.1
s*=0.3
0.4625
0.4375
0
0.47
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
W*
0.42
=0.7
=0.71
=0.73
=0.74
=0.72
0.37
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=-0.1
*=-0.05
*=0.05
*=0.1
*=0
10
www.seipub.org/fwr
0.37
W*
W*
0.43
0.345
0.32
0.405
0.05
0.15
0.2
0.38
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=-0.05
*=0.05
*=0.1
*=0
0.43
s*=0.3
s*=0.31
s*=0.33
s*=0.34
s*=0.32
*=-0.1
W*
0.1
0.45
0.43
0
0.38
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.33
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=-0.1
*=-0.05
*=0.05
*=0.1
W*
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
*
*=0
*=0.0001
*=0.01
*=0.1
=0.71
=0.73
=0.74
=0.72
*=0
=0.7
*=0.001
11
www.seipub.org/fwr
0.44
W*
0.365
0.29
0.215
0.14
-0.1
-0.05
0.05
*=0.0001
*=0.01
*=0.1
0.38
W*
*
*=0
0.43
0.1
0.33
-0.1
*=0.001
-0.06
-0.02
0.02
0.06
0.1
*=-0.1
*=-0.05
*=0.05
*=0.1
*=0
0.43
W*
0.38
0.43
0.33
W*
0.33
0.23
0.28
-0.1
-0.05
0.13
0
0.05
0.1
-0.1
-0.05
*
s*=0.3
s*=0.31
s*=0.33
s*=0.34
s*=0.32
W*
*=0
*=0.0001
*=0.01
*=0.1
*=0.001
0.43
0.455
0.405
W*
0.38
0.33
-0.05
0.1
-0.1
0.05
-0.1
0
0.05
-0.05
0.1
0.05
0.1
*
=0.71
=0.73
=0.74
=0.72
s*=0.3
s*=0.31
s*=0.33
s*=0.34
s*=0.32
W*
=0.7
0.5275
0.5025
0.4775
0.4525
-0.1
-0.05
0.05
0.1
*
=0.7
=0.73
=0.71
=0.74
=0.72
www.seipub.org/fwr
W*
0.39
0.29
0.19
0
0.025
0.05
0.075
0.1
*
s*=0.3
s*=0.31
s*=0.33
s*=0.34
s*=0.32
0.43
0.355
0.28
0.205
0.025
0.05
0.075
0.1
*
=0.7
=0.71
=0.73
=0.74
=0.72
W*
0.44
0.39
0.3
0.31
0.32
0.33
0.34
s*
=0.7
=0.71
=0.73
=0.74
=0.72
Quantity
=-0.05
with consideration
0.405189
0.40217
0.98217857
0.44438
0.38620
0.93639767
0.40821
0.4113
0.99775243
0.45591
0.46192
1.12123543
0.41396
0.72803
1.00462604
13
www.seipub.org/fwr
TABLE 2
Quantity
S*=0.3
Quantity
S*=0.3
Conclusion
with consideration
with consideration
slip parameter
lubricant pressure
velocity of slider
magnetization vector
dimensionless pressure
inclined angle
fluid density
14
aspect ratio
porosity
standard deviation
0.95315409
0.91034067
0.96836269
0.9626919
1.06164908
skewness
variance
non-dimensional variance
non-dimensional porosity
non-dimensionalskewness
magnetization parameter
magnetic susceptibility
permeability of the free space
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
the
comments
and
REFERENCES
Surface
Roughness
onHydrodynamic
www.seipub.org/fwr
Method
M.V.,
of
Roughness
Analysis
in
Turbulent
Optimum
Profile
for
the
Magneto
Lin, J.R., Lu, R.F., Lin, M.C. and Wang, P.Y. SqueezeFilm
Comparison
of
Stochastic
Models
of
Hydrodynamic
A.A.
and
Alyaqout,
S.F.
Optimum
B.J.
Fundamental
Lubrication,Washington
:D.C.:
of
Fluid
NASA
Study
Bearings:
Parametric
Surfaces:
Film
Reference
Publication, 1994.
Kazuyuki, Y. and Joichi,S. ElastohydrodynamicSimulation
of Rayleigh Step Bearings in Thin FilmHydrodynamic
Lubrication, Tri. Int. 64, 2013, 204-214.
Lahmar, M., Bou-Said, B. and Tichy, J. The Homogenization
of
Magnetic
Fluid
Based
for
Squeeze
Film
between
Porous
Slider
Bearing
by
Ferro-Fluid
with
R.C.
and
Bhat,
M.V.
Lubrication
of
Porous
15
www.seipub.org/fwr
16