Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Court:
Is the mother of the girl single?
Mr. particularly:
She was unmarried when conceived and gave birth to the girl.
Court:
Containment now of the petitioner is while in the trachea it comes is a natural
daughter, in what
concerning the appealed Servando Estrera is adulterina daughter.
Court:
You submit the matter for the decision of the Court convista of the writings of
both sides now
presented before the Court?
Mr. Alo:
We are satisfied to refer the matter in accordance with the allegations and
submit this document
signed by the applicant for consideration by the Court, with its corresponding
translation (the
italics are ours).
Mr. particularly:
We then ask permission to submit a memorandum of authorities to hold ours
in ten days
containment.
Court:
Do you expect the Court to decide the matter without presentation of
memorandum or going to submit?
memorandum?
Mr. Alo:
I'm going to introduce jurisprudence.
Mr. particularly:
It is not because we would like to sacrifice the future of the girl because there
are technicalities that we favor,
But if the Challenger love the girl, we suggest to adopt to the girl and
frompanzani give the
custody of the little girl (the italics are ours).
Mr. Alo:
Well, such as this proposition, accept (t. n. t., pp. 1, 2, 3 and 4, pages 46, 47,
48 and 49, exp. of the)
Court).
And here ends the transcription of the notes taquigraficas.
For it is not known that grounds the appellant not presto consent to the
adoption; so this failure, and the judge
Macadaeg there was after issuing statement desestimandola application for
habeas corpus and the following,
namely:
In view of the foregoing, the Court believes and so holds that the custody of
the minor Dulcisima should
remain with the respondents in this case. The petition therefore is hereby
dismissed without special
pronouncement as to costs.
The decision of this Court should not be interpreted to mean that the petitioner
is deprived from herein
visiting her child. Respondents are hereby warned that they should not
unreasonably refuse the petitioner to
visit her.
Judgment dictated so this appeal has been lodged.
102, section 1, rules of court, rule reads as follows:
SECTION 1. To what habeas corpus extends. -Except as otherwise expressly
provided by law, the writ of habeas corpus shall extend to all cases of illegal
confinement or detention by which any person is deprived
of his liberty, or by which the rightful custody of any person is withheld from
the person entitled thereto.
Having the parties submitted this matter to the Court of first instance for its
decision with vista so solode the
Mendoza. Not seniega its authenticity. Here is his translation to the Spanish:
To whom concerns:
I do note that I, Soria Bernardo Daz, filipina, adult and neighbor of the town of
Badian, Cebu,
I give my daughter Dulcisima who was born in the home of Lord and Lady of
Servando B. Estrera husbands,
the village of Mandaue, Cebu, due to its large love my daughter and as
correspondence to their
concerns and expenses on the occasion of my birth I've offered to them
without any avacilacion or desire to have
the aforementioned girl.
I do understand that when firm this document has ceased miautoridad about
my daughter and if in the days
future attempts to intervene, claiming the girl and c, I could be acusadaante
the courts of the
village so I punish for breach, that I committed this contract that I signed.
I signed this on this day 20 of February of the year 1944 in presenciade
witnesses signing below.
(Fda.) Bernardo Diaz Soria
The girl's mother
(Fdo). Geronimo Castaeda
Witness
(Fdo). Arcadio Mendoza
Witness
One of the mistakes that lawyers of the recurentes enalan in his plea refers to
this document of resignation
-because, in fact, so should be considered: waive custody or parental
authority. Is excepcionan against the
action of the Court a quo to take it into account as one of the foundations of
signed by the applicant for the consideration of the Court with their
corresponding translation. (T. n. t.,)
p. 3, folio 48, the court record.)
This shows palpably to the lawyer Mr. Alotenia in his hands the document; that
the Court as teniaante
Yes; and that Mr. Zosa, counsel for the appellant, also had front and could
have examined, and is depresumir
that I look at it. Not only Mr. Zosa not objectA presentation and acceptance of
the document, but absolute queguardo
silence on it. More still: alfinal manifestations suggested that the Challenger
take legally to
the girl, "... and will arenunciar the custody of the girl," conclude by saying (t.
n. t., p. 4, folio 49, exp. of the)
Court). Front Athis attitude of the appellant, for clear and positive search
We resolve this issue depends on the outcome of the application for habeas
corpus. If, despite this document, the the
you are entitled to recover waived parental, the command should be issued;
otherwise, not.
Parental authority is waivable. There is nothing in our laws and in our case law
prohibiting not only
that waiver, but a law of the Philippine legislature, the law No. 3094,
promulgated on March 16, 1923, the
It allows and expressly authorize. Article 1 this law provides:
ARTICLE 1. Every institution publishes or any charitable beneficao,
incorporated in accordance with society
the laws of the Philippines and duly authorized for this purpose by the
Secretary of the Interior by means
of the Commissioner of public welfare, tengapor object to receive, shelter,
care, place for your
adoption and adoption consentiren, or improve the situation of homeless
orphans,
abandoned or mistreated, whose teachings are not contrary to Christian
principles of morality,
will be empowered to receive, exercise authority, teach, educate, protect, care
for, arrange and place for the
adoption and indulge in adopting any less than eighteen years of age, when
the father and
mother, or the person or persons who legally have the right act as tutors of
such minor
to deliver this, by letter, to the care and custody of such an institution or
society, and after decho
This person of the above-mentioned child will be under the legal custody of
the institution or society for the purposes
adulterous. The answer to this is that any better right that would have the
appellant as
natural mother of the minor Dulcisima, expired when I waive it under the
document that
tantasveces has made merit.
The only question that remains now to determine and resolve is whether the
appellant can return on its agreements in
why reasonable, i.e. If it can rescind the relinquishment document by its sole
and exclusive desire, because if,
because it gives you real want do it, without claim or proof that the father
appealed against or the Challenger have
incurred in any action or omission that disable them to continue exercising on
the girl child Dulcisima rights
of custody. The resolution of this question must necessarily be against the
claims of the
recurrent. She could only regain custody relinquishment dasi resorted father
ceased to comply with the deberesque
You incumbre, that is, feed, breed and educated the girl as it should; but we
have already seen that no there is
allegation or proof to this effect. On the contrary, consists in cars that the tours
are much better
conditions that the applicant to provide to not do a comfort.
The argument that the document in question is null for lack of cause or
consideration is clearly futile. Not
a material consideration should seek for themselves the appellant lawyers say
that the body of the
Dulcisima this girl out of trade in men. Not be a sale or Exchange. The
consideration here is the welfare of the child. In the asuntode Slade Perkins
against Perkins (57 Jur. Fil., 227,
Septiembre12, 1932) have declared that "less ofa welfare is normally the
predominant consideration"
on the question of their custody." Natural and sentiments of the paternity or
maternity, by respectable
which are tien in that yield to the paramount consideration. And not relax the
rule just fundamentally try to children
code. It is true that in a fairly remote pasadoya these unhappy not gozabande
any right: such
It was the disgust that the sociedadsentia against them. But undoubtedly,
albeit slowly, their condition has
improved and humanizandose firmly in the social concept. From the seven
games that almost no them
granted nothing until the Civil Code queles recognized rights that now have,
the advance condition desu has
been significant. And is equally no doubt that the social tendency in all
civilized and cultured countries is to
increasingly less oppressive, more liberal and more human towards these
beings des fortunate that, being born into the world
without any fault on his part, and enough misfortune in accordance with the
mass of prejudice that social einhibiciones
they weigh upon them.
Merits of the above, confirm the judgement appealed no pronouncement as to
the coasts.
So is ordered.
Moran, Pres., Paras, fair, Pablo, perfect, Bengzon, Hontiveros, y Tuason, mm.,
are compliant.