0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
149 просмотров1 страница
There are multiple tests under Australian law to determine whether an individual or company is considered a resident for tax purposes. For individuals, the tests include the common law test of domicile, physical presence in Australia for over 183 days in a year, and participation in Australia's superannuation system. For companies, residency is established if the company is incorporated in Australia, carries on business in Australia and has its central management and control located in Australia, or if Australian residents control its voting power. Key court cases have examined factors such as a person's nationality, family ties, and maintenance of a home to determine residency under the common law test.
There are multiple tests under Australian law to determine whether an individual or company is considered a resident for tax purposes. For individuals, the tests include the common law test of domicile, physical presence in Australia for over 183 days in a year, and participation in Australia's superannuation system. For companies, residency is established if the company is incorporated in Australia, carries on business in Australia and has its central management and control located in Australia, or if Australian residents control its voting power. Key court cases have examined factors such as a person's nationality, family ties, and maintenance of a home to determine residency under the common law test.
There are multiple tests under Australian law to determine whether an individual or company is considered a resident for tax purposes. For individuals, the tests include the common law test of domicile, physical presence in Australia for over 183 days in a year, and participation in Australia's superannuation system. For companies, residency is established if the company is incorporated in Australia, carries on business in Australia and has its central management and control located in Australia, or if Australian residents control its voting power. Key court cases have examined factors such as a person's nationality, family ties, and maintenance of a home to determine residency under the common law test.
Residency: s995-1 ITAA 1997 provides that an Australian resident
means a resident in accordance with the ITAA 1936.
resident or resident of Australia means: (i) whose domicile is in Australia, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that his permanent place of abode is outside Australia; (ii) who has actually been in Australia, continuously or intermittently, during more than one half of the year of income, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that his usual place of abode is outside Australia and that he does not intend to take up residence in Australia; or (iii) who is: (A) a member of the superannuation scheme established by deed under the Superannuation Act 1990 (Cth); or(B) an eligible employee for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth); or (C) the spouse, or a child under 16, of a person covered by sub-paragraph (A) or (B) Residency of a person other than a company: Section 6(1) of the ITAA36 provides two definitions of residents. 1 The primary test - being the common law concept of resident. 2 The second test comprises three statutory tests. There are 4 tests which determine whether an individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for taxation purposes. 1. The common law test 2. The domicile test 3. The 183-day test 4. The superannuation fund test. To be a resident individual at least one of the tests must be satisfied. Residency of a person other than a company - common law tests: Australian courts take a number of factors into account: 1. Physical presence of the person in Australia for some part of the year; 2. The nationality of the person; 3. The persons history of residence and movements (e.g. maintenance of a home) 4. The persons mode of life 5. Employment 6. Business and social relations 7. The presence of an immediate family 8. If the person is a visitor to Australia, the frequency, regularity, duration and purpose of the visits. Leading cases: FCT v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93. FCT v Applegate 79 ATC 4307, Levene v IRC (1928) AC 217, IRC v Lysaght (1928) AC 234, Joachim v FCT (2002) 50 ATR 1072 TR 98/17: Relevant factors: a) the intended and actual length of the taxpayer's stay in the overseas country; (b) whether the taxpayer intended to stay in the overseas country only temporarily and then to move on to another country or to return to Australia at some definite point in time; (c) whether the taxpayer has established a home (in the sense of dwelling place; a house or other shelter that is the fixed residence of a person, a family, or a household), outside Australia; (d) whether any residence or place of abode exists in Australia or has been abandoned because of the overseas absence; (e) the duration and continuity of the taxpayer's presence in the overseas country; and (f) the durability of association that the person has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining bank accounts in Australia, place of education of the taxpayer's children, family ties and so on. Resides - physical presence: The leading cases are those of FCT v Applegate 79 ATC 4307 and FCT v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93. A reference to Applegates case - in which the Court determined that a taxpayer could not be considered to be residing in Australia as he was not physically present, having a permanent place of abode in Vanuatu. In Millers case the High Court held that a man resides where he sleeps and lives, and thus Miller was a non-resident. Resides - Habits and mode of life; Resides Nationality: The leading case is that of Levene - refer above. Rowlatt J noted that a person is ordinarily resident in a country where the ordinary course of life is such as to disclose residence in that country. Levene was habitually in England and belonged there. Nationality: This factor is usually only used in borderline cases.
Second Test Domicile: There are two parts to this test to
determine residency: 1. a persons domicile must be in Australia; and 2. the Commissioner is satisfied that the persons permanent place of abode is not overseas. Domicile is a legal concept - and has two main forms which are: 1. domicile of origin which is obtained by implication of law and is acquired at birth, involving an adoption of either the childs father or childs mothers domicile. It cannot be changed; and 2. domicile of choice which is the place where the person has a fixed permanent they intend to return to after being away. Domicile - permanent place of abode: The courts have considered the following factors to be of importance when determining permanent place of abode:1. intention as to length of stay; 2. actual length of stay; 3. abandonment of place of abode in Australia; 4. acquisition of place of abode outside Australia; and intention to make place of abode home. Residency Company: a company which is incorporated in Australia, or which, not being incorporated in Australia, carries on business in Australia, and has either its central management and control in Australia, or its voting power controlled by shareholders who are residents of Australia.So, company must satisfy one of the three tests.1. Incorporation 2. Central Management and Control 3. Controlling shareholders Company residency? First test: If a company is incorporated in Australia then it is a resident. There is no need for further inquiry. Incorporation is a question of fact. Second test: Otherwise if it carries on business in Australia and has centralised management in Australia it is a resident. Again, a question of fact.See TR 2004/15; Koitaki Para Rubber Estates Ltd v FCT (1960) 64 CLR 15, 2 AITR 167 (mere day to day control over operations not sufficient, if the control is subject to monitoring by head office overseas) and Malayan Shipping Co. Ltd v FCT (1946) 3 AITR 258.