Hypothesis Testing of Question No

Hypothesis testing of Question
No. 1 & 2
H0: There is no association between Male child preferred over
female child and Parents send only male child for better education.
H1: There is association between Male child preferred over

female child and Parents send only male child for better education.
Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.
Quality education * Better School Cross tabulation

Better School
Strongly
Quality education
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
12
17
14
51
Expected Count
10.7
14.8
9.2
13.3
3.1
51.0
Count
12
31
Expected Count
6.5
9.0
5.6
8.1
1.9
31.0
Count
Expected Count
1.3
1.7
1.1
1.6
.4
6.0
Count
Expected Count
1.5
2.0
1.3
1.8
.4
7.0
Count
Expected Count
1.0
1.4
.9
1.3
.3
5.0
Count
21
29
18
26
100
Expected Count
21.0
29.0
18.0
26.0
6.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
33.735a
16
.006
Likelihood Ratio
34.446
16
.005
Linear-by-Linear Association
5.807
.016
N of Valid Cases
100
a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .30.
Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 4 & 5
H0: There is not any association that male child thought as next
bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic
burden.
H1: There is any association that male child thought as next

bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic
burden.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Bread Winner * Socio Economic Burden Cross tabulation

Socio Economic Burden
Strongly
Bread Winner
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
11
27
Expected Count
4.0
4.9
8.4
7.0
2.7
27.0
Count
19
32
Expected Count
4.8
5.8
9.9
8.3
3.2
32.0
Count
18
Expected Count
2.7
3.2
5.6
4.7
1.8
18.0
Count
19
Expected Count
2.8
3.4
5.9
4.9
1.9
19.0
Count
Expected Count
.6
.7
1.2
1.0
.4
4.0
Count
15
18
31
26
10
100
Expected Count
15.0
18.0
31.0
26.0
10.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
T54. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
46.863a
16
.000
Likelihood Ratio
46.245
16
.000
5.947
.015
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

No. 6 & 7
H0: There is independency that Liberties enjoyed by the male
and only male child given opportunity to study abroad.
H1: There is dependency that Liberties enjoyed by the male and

only male child given opportunity to study abroad.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Liberties * Abroad study Cross tabulation

Abroad study
Strongly
Liberties
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
20
Expected Count
4.6
5.4
4.2
2.4
3.4
20.0
Count
31
Expected Count
7.1
8.4
6.5
3.7
5.3
31.0
Count
20
Expected Count
4.6
5.4
4.2
2.4
3.4
20.0
Count
21
Expected Count
4.8
5.7
4.4
2.5
3.6
21.0
Count
Expected Count
1.8
2.2
1.7
1.0
1.4
8.0
Count
23
27
21
12
17
100
Expected Count
23.0
27.0
21.0
12.0
17.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
21.010a
16
.178
Likelihood Ratio
25.407
16
.063
4.347
.037
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 8 & 10
H0: There is no assurance that females only given Peripheral
jobs and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at
organization.
H1: There is assurance that females only given Peripheral jobs

and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at organization.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
PeriphalJobs * Harsh Remark Cross tabulation

Harsh Remark
Strongly
PeriphalJobs
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
29
Expected Count
5.2
10.4
9.0
2.0
2.3
29.0
Count
11
11
31
Expected Count
5.6
11.2
9.6
2.2
2.5
31.0
Count
12
28
Expected Count
5.0
10.1
8.7
2.0
2.2
28.0
Count
Expected Count
.7
1.4
1.2
.3
.3
4.0
Count
Expected Count
1.4
2.9
2.5
.6
.6
8.0
Count
18
36
31
100
Expected Count
18.0
36.0
31.0
7.0
8.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
21.468a
16
.161
Likelihood Ratio
26.495
16
.047
2.927
.087
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 11 & 13
H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous
and tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of
organization.
H1: There is stability that Males only subjected to rigorous and

tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of organization.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Tiring Work Stress * Workhorse Cross tabulation

Workhorse
Strongly
Tiring Work
Strongly Agree
Stress
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
20
Expected Count
3.6
8.4
5.0
2.4
.6
20.0
Count
15
31
Expected Count
5.6
13.0
7.8
3.7
.9
31.0
Count
11
29
Expected Count
5.2
12.2
7.2
3.5
.9
29.0
Count
10
Expected Count
1.8
4.2
2.5
1.2
.3
10.0
Count
10
Expected Count
1.8
4.2
2.5
1.2
.3
10.0
Count
18
42
25
12
100
Expected Count
18.0
42.0
25.0
12.0
3.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
23.544a
16
.100
Likelihood Ratio
26.086
16
.053
2.279
.131
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 11 & 14
H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous
and tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of
their right.
H1: There is stability that Males only subjected to rigorous and

tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of
their right.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Tiring Work Stress * Field Jobs Cross tabulation

Field Jobs
Strongly
Tiring Work
Strongly Agree
Stress
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
20
Expected Count
4.8
5.6
4.6
4.0
1.0
20.0
Count
10
31
Expected Count
7.4
8.7
7.1
6.2
1.6
31.0
Count
10
11
29
Expected Count
7.0
8.1
6.7
5.8
1.4
29.0
Count
10
Expected Count
2.4
2.8
2.3
2.0
.5
10.0
Count
10
Expected Count
2.4
2.8
2.3
2.0
.5
10.0
Count
24
28
23
20
100
Expected Count
24.0
28.0
23.0
20.0
5.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
23.975a
16
.090
Likelihood Ratio
27.590
16
.035
.318
.573
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 15 & 17
H0: There is not association that male gender is always preferred
as bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.
H1: There is association that male gender is always preferred as

bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Pref Bread Winner * Households Cross tabulation

Households
Strongly
Pref Bread
Strongly Agree
Winner
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
12
11
10
39
Expected Count
9.4
14.8
8.2
4.3
2.3
39.0
Count
17
37
Expected Count
8.9
14.1
7.8
4.1
2.2
37.0
Count
15
Expected Count
3.6
5.7
3.2
1.6
.9
15.0
Count
Expected Count
1.0
1.5
.8
.4
.2
4.0
Count
Expected Count
1.2
1.9
1.0
.6
.3
5.0
Count
24
38
21
11
100
Expected Count
24.0
38.0
21.0
11.0
6.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
24.699a
16
.075
Likelihood Ratio
25.721
16
.058
.901
.343
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 16 & 18
H0: There is not association that mother considered solely
responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their
mother as their friend.
H1: There is association that mother considered solely

responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their
mother as their friend.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Child Grooming * Friend Consider Cross tabulation

Friend Consider
Strongly
Child Grooming
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
11
24
Expected Count
6.2
7.0
6.5
3.1
1.2
24.0
Count
10
14
13
47
Expected Count
12.2
13.6
12.7
6.1
2.4
47.0
Count
20
Expected Count
5.2
5.8
5.4
2.6
1.0
20.0
Count
Expected Count
1.8
2.0
1.9
.9
.4
7.0
Count
Expected Count
.5
.6
.5
.3
.1
2.0
Count
26
29
27
13
100
Expected Count
26.0
29.0
27.0
13.0
5.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
18.991a
16
.269
Likelihood Ratio
19.326
16
.252
.157
.692
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 17 & 19
H0: There is not any association that husband also take part in
household activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of
child.
H1: There is association that husband also take part in household

activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of child.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Households * Mischief of Child Cross tabulation

Mischief of Child
Strongly
Households
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
12
24
Expected Count
5.8
7.2
6.7
2.9
1.4
24.0
Count
11
11
38
Expected Count
9.1
11.4
10.6
4.6
2.3
38.0
Count
10
21
Expected Count
5.0
6.3
5.9
2.5
1.3
21.0
Count
11
Expected Count
2.6
3.3
3.1
1.3
.7
11.0
Count
Expected Count
1.4
1.8
1.7
.7
.4
6.0
Count
24
30
28
12
100
Expected Count
24.0
30.0
28.0
12.0
6.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
35.496a
16
.003
Likelihood Ratio
39.104
16
.001
4.195
.041
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 21 & 23
H0: There is independency that female seats are less in national
assembly and female never given presidency because of weak
nerve.
H1: There is dependency that female seats are less in national

assembly and female never given presidency because of weak
nerve.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
NA seats * Presidency Cross tabulation

Presidency
Strongly
NA seats
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
12
11
34
Expected Count
8.5
8.5
8.5
5.4
3.1
34.0
Count
31
Expected Count
7.8
7.8
7.8
5.0
2.8
31.0
Count
22
Expected Count
5.5
5.5
5.5
3.5
2.0
22.0
Count
Expected Count
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.4
.8
9.0
Count
Expected Count
1.0
1.0
1.0
.6
.4
4.0
Count
25
25
25
16
100
Expected Count
25.0
25.0
25.0
16.0
9.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
24.003a
16
.089
Likelihood Ratio
27.039
16
.041
.534
.465
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 24 & 25
H0: There is not association that females are not given
opportunities and females doctors waste their studies in house
after marriage.
H1: There is association that females are not given opportunities

and females doctors waste their studies in house after marriage.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Family Burden * After Marriage Cross tabulation

After Marriage
Strongly
Family Burden
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
13
21
Expected Count
4.2
8.4
4.2
2.3
1.9
21.0
Count
27
Expected Count
5.4
10.8
5.4
3.0
2.4
27.0
Count
13
33
Expected Count
6.6
13.2
6.6
3.6
3.0
33.0
Count
14
Expected Count
2.8
5.6
2.8
1.5
1.3
14.0
Count
Expected Count
1.0
2.0
1.0
.6
.4
5.0
Count
20
40
20
11
100
Expected Count
20.0
40.0
20.0
11.0
9.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
19.996a
16
.220
Likelihood Ratio
22.339
16
.133
5.083
.024
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

No. 29 & 30
H0: There is independency that liberalism has reduced the
respect of woman and males are dominant only because of their
superior masculine strength.
H1: There is dependency that liberalism has reduced the respect

of woman and males are dominant only because of their superior
masculine strength.
Test Statistics:
Critical region:
reject.
Liberalism * Masculine Strength Cross tabulation

Masculine Strength
Strongly
Liberalism
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Total
Count
19
Expected Count
7.0
6.1
3.0
2.3
.6
19.0
Count
13
23
Expected Count
8.5
7.4
3.7
2.8
.7
23.0
Count
10
31
Expected Count
11.5
9.9
5.0
3.7
.9
31.0
Count
12
21
Expected Count
7.8
6.7
3.4
2.5
.6
21.0
Count
Expected Count
2.2
1.9
1.0
.7
.2
6.0
Count
37
32
16
12
100
Expected Count
37.0
32.0
16.0
12.0
3.0
100.0
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
28.887a
16
.025
Likelihood Ratio
30.918
16
.014
.002
.961
N of Valid Cases
100

Conclusion:

Hypothesis Testing of Question No

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Hypothesis Testing of Question No

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Hypothesis testing of Question

H1: There is association between Male child preferred over

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Quality education * Better School Cross tabulation

a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum