Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
H. N. MARSH *
AND
E. V. WATTS*
ABSTRACT
problems, presenting data on the accuracy of the hydraulic type, outlining uses of dynamometer data, and
describing field and office procedure. Examples are
included and beneficial results cited.
. .
The dynamometer is essentially a device for recording the load on the polished rod as a function of
polished-rod position. There a r e two general forms:
1, the strain gage type, with several modifications; and,
2, the diaphragm hydraulic type. Although the latter
is the only one with which the authors have had much
experience, most of the paper is equally applicable to
both types.
1
,
i
1
i
I
~i
j
~
,
!
I
,
1
;
1
I
FIG. 4
being shunted around t h e transformer. ( A little gasoline and a few hammer blows usually eliminate sticking.)
5. The point of attachment of t h e chain used to
reciprocate t h e d r u m should be so selected t h a t a card
a t least 3 in. long is obtained. Also, angles HI anti pi.
should be equal, a s shown in Fig. 1. If the recorder 1 3
placed so t h a t t h e chain is vertical, this point will fall
on a line joining the center bearing and the s t i r t u l .
bearing. I n r a r e cases where the beam h a s a horseheact
and swings through a n angle greater t h a n about ,(I
deg., i t is desirable t h a t a miniature horsehead like\\ I - r
he provided f o r t h e chain.
Definite Results
'n
. ------4
FUMPING FWID
GA5
Inferred Results
Perhaps the main conclusion to be established concerning sub-surface conditions is the location of the
fluid level. Should the fluid level be a t the pump, i t
inay be rlossible to improve the r i g operation without
loss of production.' On the other hand, if the fluid level
is above the pump, then i t is desirable to determine the
reason f o r this condition. I n general, high fluid can
be attributed to one o r more of three causes: 1, low
volumetric efficiency of pump due to a n ineffective g a s
anchor, large clearance space, poor valves, entrance
losses, or slippage; 2, tubing o r shoe leaks; or, 3, good
TABLE 1
Showing Some of the Sub-surface Co~~ditions
which May Be Inferred from Surface Data
Fluid Pound
Indicated
(Cards 8, 10, 12)
(Refer to Fig. 5)
Dynamometer card taken a t slow
speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Similar to card 3
or 4
(Refer to Fig. 3)
Volumetric efficiency . . . . . . . . . . .
Low
Below-ground efficiency . . . . . . . . .
Low
Lo\%*
Gas-oil ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.,".
Daily production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Regular,moderate
decline
Fluid Pound
Indicated
(Cards 8, 10, 12)
No Fluid Pound
Indicated
(Cards 7, 9, 11)
No Fluid Pound
Indicated
(Cards 7, 9, 11)
Similar to card 5
Similar to card 5
Similar to card 5
High
High
Low
Low
Low
....
....
....
,...
or 6
Low
Low
High
Low
Irregular, slight
decline
Regular, slight
decline
FIELD PROCEDURE
3. Tachometer
4. Thermometer
5. Stopwatch
6. Flexible rule
I/'se
Power input to motor
Power output of engine*
Average speed of prime
mover
Speed variation of prime
mover
Temperature rise of motor
Strokes per minute, turns
per minute, etc.
Stroke length, pulley sizes,
etc.
* The t o r q u e - n i a ~ ~ i f o l depression
d
characteristics can be obtained from t h e manufacturer of t h e e n g i n ~ . See bibliography,
referemctl 10.
shown on the record a s the familiar fluid pound; therefore, it may be said t h a t t h e head of fluid normally on
the intake is equivalent to .the rise in pressure observed
a t the casinghead.
TABLE 2
Pumping-Well Operation
W E L L "A"
Well
Present depth,
6,890 ft.
Casing, 42-in. to 7,260 ft.
Liner,
none
Perforations,
from 6,250 ft. to 6,885 ft.
Pump depth,
6,712 ft.
Tubing,
6,668 ft. of 25-in. and 44 ft. of 2-in.
2-in. x 12-in. rod, sectional liner
Pump,
6,699 ft. of $-in.
Sucker rods,
9 in. x 8 ft.
inner tube,
outer tube, 3 in. x 14 ft.
Gas anchor,
Production,
gross,
134 bbl.
Net
108 bbl.
29.5 deg. A P I
Gravity of wet oil.
550 cu. ft. per bbl. of oil
Gas-oil ratio,
0
Casing,
open to line
Casing pressure,
X r i g front
45 in. (3rd crank hole)
18.5 strokes per minute
Ratio, 22.2 to 1
Number of weights,
10 lead
11,200 lb.
( A P I rating)
11,450 lb.
(calculated)
11,500 lb.
(by dynamometer)
Rig
Length of stroke,
Pumping speed,
Reduction unit,
chain and sprocket
Counterbalance,
rotary
Present effective weight,
Theoretically-correct weight,
Correct weight,
Motor
Controller point,
Power input,
R.p.m., average,
410
Dynamometer Cards
18.5 SPM.
5 re,ooo
d
SLOW SPEED
4 le-OoO
WElGHT OF
?'
WEIGHT OF WOS'
6,000
1
0 DOWN
POSITION OF C20D5
UP
0
DOWN
Dynamometer Data
Maximum load,
Minimum load,
Power a t polished rod,
Peak torque,
15,400
8,100
10.3
88,000
lb.
lb.
hp.
in-lb.
POSITION OF ROD5
Above-ground efficiency,
Below-ground efficiency,
Estimated volumetric efficiency,
UP
59 per cent
57 per cent
98 per cent
OFFICE PROCEDIIRE
Office ~ ~ I ' o c e d ~can
r e be presented best hy discussing
an actual test. \\:ell "A" had been producing a n average
of 125 hbl. per day gross for rnore than eight months
with 1)ractically no decline and little trouble; and, although it was suspected t h a t the lvell was capable of
proclucing. more, it was desirable t o have some concrete
data on the existing load and perforlnarlcr hefore lnaki11g a115 changes. A sub-surface pressurt. test would
haxe been helpful; but, because t h e w Jrerr two joints
of 2-111.tubing on bottom, the gage a ~ a i l a b l ecould not
be ruli without pulling tublng. Owing to the depth of
the hole, thls typc~of test would h a \ e requlred much
time: ; i ~ l dexpense, and woultl have givr~n110 infolm~atioll
on t h e equally important questloll of r1g Ioatls. Therefor<. ;i preliminary in\-estigation was made n ~ t hthe
dyn;ilnomtter. Thca ~iel.tinc>ntd a t a and ~.t,sults:ire given
in 'Table 2.
Using this ivell :is all examplc, the cwlcuiatioll of results ir presented herewith.
Z t P O LlNE
ATMOSPHERIC
LlNE
011
T / , e ) i the followil~~g
coln~)utat.ions
can t ~ t matie
.
:
1. Masilnurn l o a d
('
2. Minimu~n l o a d .
('
-.
I ) mas.
11
min.
r (
/
I
1
i
-,
12,800) ( 0 . 6 3 )r 8 , 1 0 0 lh.
stroke (feet
;\strokes
per mlnute
( 4 5 ) (18.31
-- ) .
=12'800(%)
( 1 2 ) (:33,000)
,.I:j,OOO
11o11shed-l.odhorsel)ower- - 10.3
-- -39 per cent
17.6
g r o u ~ i dI I ~ I L el.
\
t~fficit~ncq -- Input horsepower
7 Ahu\ t'
the t~el<~\v-!zruuntl
efficiency :
7 ' i i ~ t ~ .
theoretical hol,sel)o\ver
~,olishetl-rodhol.sel~o\\-er
10.3 -
hp,
172
--
--
PRODUCTION
-
L.-a-3
Q-a-G
P-a-D
EXAMPLE :
4.134
G.ZQ5
0.6712
THEN. P - 5 0
EXAMPLE
4.45
3. IS.3
L L . Z 9 1 A.1.14
C *12.800
wrn. H P ~ ~ o ~ I Z . ~ . ~ ~ ~
Polished-Rod Horsepower.
FIG. 9
especially if many tests must be computed. Fig. 9,
10, 11, and 12 illustrate some of the charts which
can be made, with calculations for well "A" shown a s
examples.
OTHER EXAMPLES
Well "B"
Well "B," in the stripper stage, was giving occasional trouble; in nine months there had been two pump
repairs o r replacements and three rod failures-nothing
serious, but subject to improvement. Results of a dynamometer test, given in Table 3, indicated t h a t the well
FIG. 11
FIG. 12
Daily Production-Well
FIG. 13
"A."
WELI, ('R"
n'rll
I'resent depth,
.;,7.50 f t .
Casing, %in. to 6,310 fr.
I,iner,
none
Perforations f r o m :,GOO f t . to 5,710 ft.
.-),726ft.
Tuhing, 5,635 f t . of ::-in. a n d 91 f t . of 2:-in.
Pump depth,
?-in. ,. 1 :-in. rod, sectional 1int:r
I'ump,
I,,l.56 ft. of ;-in. a i d 4,O.S f t . of ,:-i~i.
Sucker rods.
Gas anchor,
outer tutw, :( in. >: 20 f t .
Inner tube, 2 i n . x 8 f t .
Production,
rross.
4 1 hhl.
Net
21 bbl.
g . 8 (leg. A i f ' l
( ; r a v i t y of wc t oil,
280 cu. f t . p e l h l ~ l of
. oil
Gas-oil ratio,
('asinp,
ol~ento li11t.
Casing pressure, ( I
N rig front
1-1I in.
20.1 strokes per minute
ILatio, 22.2 to 1
Nuinbe' of weights,
10 lead
11,300 lb. ( A P I r a t i n g )
10,200 lb. (calculated)
10,760 Ib. ( b y dynamometer)
l<i~
1.enpth of sti.okc.,
k'u~nping speetl,
Reduction unit,
chain and sproclic~t
Counte~~halallce,
rota ry
Present effective weight,
Theoretically-correct weight.
Correct weight.
2.;- to 65-hp.
illoror
Controller pornt,
Power input,
I:.l).m., average.
l ti;
SLOW SPEED
W t l G H T OF POD)
AND
PLUID,
9 '8-000]
0
,WEtGHT
2
o
PoslTloN
C+ -03
AND
FU!D
ODOWN
OF
RODS
UP
17,300 lb.
*7,000 Ib.
6.6 hi'
112,000 in-lh.
AWN
POSITION OF ROD5
Above-ground efficiench-.
Below-ground efficiency,
Estimated volumetric eficiei~cy,
UP
50 per cent
24 p e l cent
29 per cent
TABLE 4
Pumping-Well Operation
W E L L "C"
we1 I
Present depth,
Liner,
P u m p depth,
IJump
Sucker rods,
Gas anchor,
Production,
Gravity of wet
Gas-oil ratio,
Casing,
3,785 ft.
Casing, 9-in. to 3,725 f t .
Perforations f r o m 3,729 f t . to 3,785 f t .
6: in. from 3,681 f t . to 3,785 ft.
3,611 ft.
Tubing,
3,611 ft. of 23-in.
2;-in. x 12-in. rod, sectional liner
3,592 f t . of :-in.
Inner tube, 1: in. x 8 f t .
outer tube, 2: in. x 21 f t .
Gross,
165 bbl.
Net,
162 bbl.
30.7 deg. A P I
oil,
100 cu. f t . per bbl. of oil
Casing pressure,
1 Ib.
open t o line
Standard
494 in. (4th crank hole)
23.2 strokes per minute
Motor end of countershaft,
Bandwheel diameter,
Number of weights,
8 lead
8,900 lb. ( A P I rating)
7,000 lb. (calculated)
7,100 Ib. (by dynamometer)
Rig
Length of stroke,
Pumping speed,
Pulley diameter, motor, 11i in.
Bandwheel end of countershaft, 24 in.
Counterbalance,
rotary
Present effective weight,
Theoretically-correct weight,
Correct weight,
44 in.
10 f t .
20- t o 50-hp.
Motor
Controller point,
Power input,
R.p.m., average,
401
ainometer Cards
WEIBHT OF PODS
AND FLUID
6 15,000
0, \o.ooo
-J
01
DOWN
POSITION OF
Ilynainometer Ilata
Maximum load,
Minimum load,
Power a t polished rod,
Peak torque,
RODS
11,900
2,300
11.0
170,000
UP
lb.
lb.
hp.
in-lb.
SLOW SPEED
,WE16HT
WEIGHT OF PODS'
POSITION OF R O D 5
Above-ground efficiency,
Below-ground efficiency,
Estimated volumetric efficiency,
UP
52 per cent
29 p e r cent
47 per cent
I tcln
I)OWCI..
1<1\l
<!nb
S ~ I I Iing
I
.lSt~$r
SIOII ilig
~)I,\I~II,
.~IIIIII~I~
,\rinnal
(2l)sL
1t;lt I.
('llht
1:a I v
S:i~irlg
0
0
$1!16
$120
80
!: 2 2
-.
$l!)C
LJOIYI~,
--
BIBLIOGRAPHY
' I<.
'
I . I I ~ S . $:{I)
. . . . . . . . . . .(I.(;
Well "C"
Ten days after re-drilling had been conlpleted, well
CONCLUSION
Fifteen years' experience h a s shown t h a t a n aggressive policy of dynamometer testing is well worthwhile.
Such a policy consists of testing every well a s soon a s
practicable a f t e r i t h a s been p u t to pumping, and again
whenever there is a n y reason to suspect t h a t conditions
have changed. Nearly every such test, if properly conducted and interpreted, should lead a t least t o minor
DISCUSSION
VAMOMETER
TESTS
177
I t has been our experience, in working with a number of producers in the Mid Continent Field, that most
practical results are obtained when each well is considered a s a n individual unit. Not only should all facts
concerning the well itself be considered, but also the
service history and limitations of equipment.
I n order to get the most out of a dynamometer study,
i t is first important to study over the office records concerning the well to be studied. This should include a detailed study of production from the well, a study of the
down-time on the well and the reason for this downtime, and the detailed record of equipment failures.
The facts disclosed from these office records will show
that many wells are pumping satisfactorily, and that
little can be done to better their operation. If a well is
proved to be performing satisfactorily, then a dynamometer study may not prove economical.
If the facts concerning a well a r e carefully studied
before each dynamometer study is made, a more definite
procedure can be established a s to what to look for in
the dynamometer cards. Often times the records of the
production of the well can give a n indication of what
to expect in making the dynamometer study. If i t is
found that the well has been producing with a low
volumetric efficiency, i t may be that the well is pounding fluid-and this may be detrimental to the sucker
rods and other equipment. On the other hand, the
low efficiency may be due to other factors such as
gas getting into the barrel, preventing it from filling
with fluid, or the tubing might possibly be leaking, o r
the plunger may not be getting full travel due to excessive friction or an improper pumping cycle. A well
which is operating with too low a n efficiency is always
worth studying, and many operators agree that a
pumping well should make a t least 80 per cent volumetric efficiency based upon the polished-rod stroke.
Low efficiency is one good index of whether the well
offers good opportunity for practical results in making
a dynamometer study. Of course, it is evidently worth
making a study on a well that is giving excessive downtime due to sucker-rod o r other mechanical breakage.
One Kansas operator during the year of 1937 had a
total of 224 pumping wells with only 300 pulling jobs.
These pulling jobs included rod failures, pump repairs,
tubing jobs, etc. Out of the 300 pulling jobs, it was
found that 141 occurred in 20 wells, or 47 per cent of
MOMETER
TESTS
179
other data and instruments in connection with dynamometers in order to make a complete analysis of any
particular situation.
The dynamometer is a n easy instrument to apply, and
should be one of the first used when trouble arises. It
is believed that in almost every case excessive trouble
or cost can be attributed to over-loaded, under-balanced,
or improperly-operated equipment. It affords a simple
method of observing quickly the effects of changes in
speed, stroke, plunger size, etc., on well loads and horsepower requirements. The old trial-and-error methods
required a long time for the accumulation of evidence;