Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ELSEVIER
www.elsevier.com/locate/desal
Abstract
The treatment of a rejection of tannery effluent was carried out on an organic nanofiltration membrane. The
rejection was recovered from a leather manufacturing plant in the area of Algiers (Rouiba). The effluent of the bath
of tanning and liming charged with chromium ions was the subject of this study. In the case of synthetic solutions,
the experimental variations of the retention ranged from 94-99.9% depending on initial feed concentration. For the
tanning bath, the results indicated that chromium retentions of 60 and 30% were observed respectively in acid and
basic medium. In acid medium, the rejection of the bath of liming has generated a retention of 15%. The use of the
model of Nakao et al. [1] based on the extended modified Nernst Planck equation enabled us to compare the
theoretical retention of chromium ions with the experimental results and to calculate the membrane pore radius.
1. Introduction
Presented at the EuroMed 2004 conference on Desalination Strategies in South Mediterranean Countries: Cooperation
between Mediterranean Countries of Europe and the Southern Rim of the Mediterranean. Sponsored by the European
Desalination Society and Office National de l'Eau Potable, Marrakech, Morocco, 30 May--2June, 2004.
0011-9164/04/$- See front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
doi; 10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.018
156
2. Theoretical approach
One of the most fundamental ways to predict
the transport through a nanofiltration membrane
is by means of a model using the extended NemstPlanck equation [11-14]. The extended NemstPlanck equation is an equation of transfer (1)
taking into account all the phenomena intervening
in the transport of an ion through a membrane. It
was proposed by Dresner and Schl6gl [ 11] in the
form:
J , = - O ~ dC'
dy
(1)
By considering that the membrane is a succession of ideal membrane elements and infinitesimal
thickness in balance with diluted and ideal
solutions, Spiegler and Kedem [ 16] have proposed
Eq. (2) giving local flow of solvent.
drI,1
---~y)
(3)
The integration ofJ~ Eq. (1), on the thickness
of the membrane, gives:
R. _ (1-Fi) 0 ,
1-o,F,
in which the constant F is given by:
F~ =exp(
1-(Y;J v]
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
HD= 1
(9)
with
and r - - (2)
(4)
(10)
KT
6rq.tD
(11)
(12)
(13)
= 2(1 -)L)2 - ( 1 - ) ~ ) 4
h.,,-T~dI
(~
157
Ib.._--ff-~
v
3
Fig. 1. Pilot description. 1, feedback; 2, volumetricpump; 3,4, pressure regulation valves; 5, membrane; 6, permeate
recirculation; 7, retentate recirculation; 8, heat exchanger; D, flow meter; P, pressure sensor; T, thermometer.
158
Table 1
1.015
95.23
0.364
95.25
3.045
98.34
0.365
98.97
5.075
98.76
0.366
98.53
10.15
99.17
0.367
99.22
99
[]
98
O
97
ta
96
95
Theoretical retention
Experimental retention
r-i
940
6
J v .10
8
10
6 (m/s)
Fig. 2. Comparisonof calculated and experimental values: chromiumretention as a function of permeate flow.
[CrCI3] = 0.5 mole/m3; pH = 4.5.
Table 2
Parameters of pollution of the various baths of the tannery of Rouiba [14]
Bath type
Stage of soaking
Stage of liming
Stage of tanning
Conductivity, [xS/cm
Chlorates, mg/1
BODs, rag/1
COD, mg/1
MES, mg/l
pH
Chrome, mg/l
Sulfates, mg/1
10.87-17.37
3.118-17.250
410-1650
43,000-52,300
774-4400
6.85-7.50
-820-860
8.28-12.50
1.770-4.537
360-4180
10,100-30,500
988-2088
11-12
-83-150
28.20-31
21.000-30.000
-8320-15000
3000-8000
3.20--4.10
5000
110-160
159
Table 3
Study conditions
CrCI3
Stage of soaking
40
35
Stage of tanning
70[
60
[] Tanning bath pH = 2
~30
50
= 25
o
i 4
20
30
15
20
10
10
0
2
3
4
Applied pressure (bar)
5. C o n c l u s i o n
References
160
[3] A. Cassano, J. Adzet, R. Molinari, M.G~ Buonomenna, J. Roig and E. Drioli, Membrane treatment
by nanofiltration of exhausted vegetable tannin
liquors from the leather industry, Water Research,
37 (2003) 2426-434.
[4] D. Dellaa et M. Brahimi, Protection de l'environnement pour un d6veloppement durable TAMEG,
Rouiba, Alger, 2002.
[5] Engineering Environment Consult, Rouiba TAMEG~
February 1998.
[6] J. Schaep, C. Vandecasteele, A.W. Mohammad and
W.R. Bowen, Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes,
Separ. Purif. Technol., 22-23 (2001) 169-179.
[7] J. Gilon, N. Gara and O. Kedem, Experimental
analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration
membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 185 (2001)223-236.
[8] XuY. and R.E. Lebrun, Investigation of solute type
separation by charged nanoftltration membrane:
effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type, J.
Membr. Sci., 158 (1999) 93-104.
[9] C. Ratanatamskul, K. Yamamoto, T. Umse, and S.
Ohgaki, Effect of operating conditions on rejection
of anionic polluants in the water environnment by
nanofiltration especially in very low pressure range,
Wat. Sci. Tech., 34(9) (1996) 149-156.
[10] M. Taleb Ahmed, S. Taha, R. Maachi and G.
Dorange, The influence ofphysico-chemistry on the
retention of chromium ions during nanofiltration,
Desalination, 145 (2002) 103-108.
[11] L. Dresner, Some remarks on the integration of the
extended Nernst-Planck equation in the hyperfiltration ofmulticomponent solutions, Desalination,
10 (1972) 27.