Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
"Dorian Yates ushered in the era of the mass monsters in the '90s." various journalists
I never set out to redefine the standards for muscle mass and density over the course of my
six-year reign as Mr. Olympia. To me, bodybuilding was all about creating the best-developed
physique I possibly could, and along the way I suppose I did help to 'usher in' a new era in the
early to mid-'90s. Prior to that, it was unheard of for bodybuilders to compete at over 250
pounds in peak condition. Just a few short years after I did that at the 1993 Mr. Olympia, the
mental barrier had been knocked down and there were no shortage of pros tipping the scales
above that previously 'unattainable' mark.
My training style was unorthodox, borrowing heavily from the influences of men like Arthur
Jones and Mike Mentzer and lower in both frequency and volume from what just about every
other bodybuilder at the time was doing. But once people saw the results I was achieving,
interest in my 'Blood and Guts' style grew exponentially. My training video and book of the same
name were quite successful, and many thousands of bodybuilders used my methods with
success. There was nothing overly radical about the ideas of training briefly with high-intensity
and allowing for proper rest and recovery, but most bodybuilders had gotten caught up in the
typical 'more is better' mentality and it was holding many back from making the mass gains they
were truly capable of.
This month, I will outline the principles I successfully employed to become the largest Mr.
Olympia champion the world had ever seen up to that point in the history of the sport.
1/7
Generally speaking, I recommend that a given body part be trained once every six to seven
days. You may need slightly more or less time. Just recently a personal training client of mine
had a lot of things going on and was only able to hit legs once every 10 days instead of his
usual once a week. To his surprise, his strength went up. Apparently he needed a bit more time
for his legs to recover all along and just never realized it. So training a body part once a week is
a good starting point, but you do need to see if a day more or less works out better. You also
always need to keep in mind that systemic recovery needs to be addressed in addition to the
recovery of individual muscle groups. Every time you train intensely, your nervous and
endocrine systems undergo significant stress. Personally, I never liked to train more than two
days in a row. If I ever did, I found that my performance started to suffer noticeably. There are
some rare individuals who can make gains training as often as six days a week, but the vast
majority of people I have worked with do much better training about four times a week.
Exercise Selection
The most effective exercises for stimulating muscle growth are multi-joint movements like the
squat, bench press, deadlift, chin-up, and dip. The musculature of the human body was never
meant to work in isolation. All the compound movements put a great deal of stress on the belly
of the muscle in the mid-range of motion, which is usually their sticking point as well. If you lock
out your knees at the very top of a squat, you'll note that there's no longer any stress on the
quads, hams, and glutes. In the middle of the rep, there is tremendous stress on that whole
area. Isolation exercises are more effective at providing stress at either the full stretch or the
peak contraction of the movement. Think of leg extensions, cable crossovers or preacher curls.
To fully tax the length of any given muscle, you should perform both a basic compound
movement and an isolation exercise. For example, the chest always needs a pressing
movement as well as some type of flye (which could be a dumbbell flye, a cable crossover, or a
pec deck). Isolation movements do have their place, as they allow you to work the muscle from
various angles. This was one point I dissented with men like Arthur Jones and Mike Mentzer on.
They advocated full-body workouts, using just one key exercise per body part, whereas I never
felt this would be suitable for a bodybuilder aiming for complete development of all muscle
groups. Just as an example, an overhead press would provide plenty of stress to the anterior or
front head of the deltoids, but very little for the lateral heads. That's why I always did some type
of lateral raise in addition to presses.
The fact that different exercises actually do work specific parts of a muscle to a greater degree
was proven in the early '90s by Per A. Tesch in his book titled Muscle Meets Magnet. He used
an MRI machine to test a wide variety of exercises. Incline presses did work the entire pectoral
muscle, but the MRI reading showed that the upper chest was being stressed more, for
example. I had learned that by my own practical experience in the gym. For instance, leg
presses gave my quads good overall mass, but I didn't notice much of a flare and sweep unless
2/7
I also did hack squats. The book showed that the only type of triceps movements that stimulate
the long head of the muscle is an overhead extension. So your triceps would have a different
look to them if you included an overhead extension regularly or not. But the key point here is
that you do need both types of exercises for best growth results.
Training Volume
A very popular misconception that has been around for many decades is that increasing volume
is the most effective means of stimulating muscle growth. If that were the case, you wouldn't
need heavy weights and you wouldn't need to train to failure. That begs the question: how many
sets should you do? If three sets are better than one, why not do 10 sets, 20, 50, or 100 sets?
Training with a very high volume demands light loads and low-intensity, and it won't stimulate
muscle growth. Think about a guy who digs ditches for 8 hours a day. If high volume was so
effective, the ditch-digger would have the shoulder, back, and arm development of a pro
bodybuilder. His volume is very high, but his intensity is low, as are the loads of dirt in his
shovel. Or, consider a man who operates a jackhammer all day at a construction site. I can
stimulate more triceps growth with one intense set of skull-crushers than he can operating that
jackhammer for 8 hours.
I discovered that one heavy, intense set of an exercise, once I was properly warmed up, was all
it took to stimulate maximum growth. Anything beyond that did nothing but cut into my ability to
recover and grow. After training with more of a standard bodybuilding volume approach for a
while, I had read Heavy Duty by Mike Mentzer. He stated that most bodybuilders were
massively overtraining, and that made sense to me. Once I cut back on my training volume, I
saw immediate and significant gains. Some would argue that I was genetically-gifted and would
have grown anyway. I am sure I would have had a decent physique no matter what I did, but I
know I would never have been able to build sufficient mass to become Mr. Olympia if I hadn't
trained with high intensity and low volume. One major mistake that most bodybuilders make is
to increase training volume over time, feeling that this is how 'advanced' people should train.
The problem is that we all become much bigger and stronger over years of training, but our
ability to recover never improves much. As you are able to work the muscles heavier and
harder, they actually need less actual exercise and more time to recover. Most bodybuilders do
the complete opposite, with longer, more frequent workouts. It's also why most bodybuilders fail
to ever make much in the way of gains after their first couple years of training. Just to illustrate,
suppose you start out only able to squat 95 pounds for 10 reps; that's not putting too much
stress on your muscles and your nervous system. A few years later, you can squat 500 pounds
for 10 reps. That will put a great deal more stress on your system as a whole, and your body
needs time to recover.
Rep Range
3/7
This may go against what others have recommended, but I always found the optimal rep range
for upper body exercises was 6-8. Occasionally I would go as high as 10 reps, but never more.
For lower body training, I went just a bit higher: 10-12 reps, occasionally as high as 15 for the
leg press. I never felt anything beyond that was effective, because it meant the resistance would
be too light. And just to make it clear, I did train many others with all types of genetics, and
these rep ranges still proved to be the most effective.
Training Intensity
While training at maximum intensity is a good thing, too much of anything can be detrimental.
Eventually your nervous and adrenal system would burn out and you would become grossly
overtrained. The remedy that I found for this was to cycle my training. I determined that I could
train all-out, to failure and beyond, for periods of five or six weeks before starting to feel run
down. At that point, I would take two weeks and stop my sets just short of failure. This was
enough to allow full recuperation and 'recharge the batteries' so I could launch into another
intense training phase. Still, it is important to note that without maximum intensity, maximum
results in terms of growth can never be achieved.
4/7
always thought of my meals in terms of building a house. Every day I was laying more and more
bricks down. Just as training heavy and hard over time yields significant results, so does eating
quality food day after day. Treat your eating just as seriously as you do your training.
SIDEBAR
Training Split
Day one: Delts, traps, triceps, abs
Day two: Back, rear delts
Day three: REST
Day four: Chest, biceps, abs
Day five: Quads, hams, calves
Day six: REST
Workout One
Warm-up: 10 minutes on stationary bike, followed by gentle stretching of all muscle groups to
be trained (done before all workouts).
5/7
Workout Two
6/7
Workout Three
Workout Four
7/7