Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A) INTRODUCTION
Your excellencies, a very good evening.
May it please this honourable court. My name is Weera Premananda, the
defence counsel representing General Reed in the present proceedings.
Working alongside me is my colleague Dumo Nyathi.
Your excellencies,
I will humbly reserve 20 minutes of the courts time in order to present the
general pleadings and to address the arguments for Count 1. The second
and third count will be addressed by my learned colleague.
B) GENERAL PLEADINGS
This counsel will raise two general pleadings in this case. One in relation to
the state of affairs of the conflict in question that there is no international
armed conflict as required by every count of this charge.
Second, this counsel will raise a general defence in favour of General Reed
for the consideration of the court in the very unlikely event that the court
should find that the elements of the counts are fulfilled.
Your excellencies, may I begin addressing the first general pleadings?
Your excellencies, we submit that a state of International Armed
Conflict did not exist in territory of Kebia.
i.
International Armed Conflict
Based on the facts, it is evident that the armed conflict that was
waging is never international as it does not involve two or more
high contracting parties.
2
between the people of Kebia rebelling for liberation from the
Alphonian government.
conflicts
to
include
people
fighting
against
colonial
of
their
of
self-determination,
it
is
stated
in
the
3
If there are no further questions from the bench about the establishment of a
non-international internal armed conflict, this counsel will to proceed to the
second general allegations.
regards
to
individual
criminal
responsibility,
that
At the time of the conflict, President Arrow was acting in his official
capacity as President of Alphon and appointed General Reed as the
leading commander of the AAF. This counsel submits that this
appointment had made General Reed answerable to President Arrow
and is legally obliged to follow orders.
In the Fact Dossier which can be found in Paragraph 16 of Page 4,
President Arrow also emphasized and had given explicit instruction
to win the war as soon as possible, as he quoted we cannot win
this war quick enough, which an order General Reed was legally
obliged to follow. It is submitted this order by President Arrow
carried specific orders to General Reed to win the war as soon as
possible which included taking the actions that are in question in
the respective counts in this charge.
It is submitted that General Reed was only carrying out his legal
obligations, he should be afforded this general defence in the
unlikely event that the court should find that the counts are proved
beyond reasonable doubt to be satisfied.
4
If there are no further questions from the bench with regards to the General
Allegations, this counsel hopes to proceed with the count 1
C) COUNT 1
The defendant is charged with the war crime of intentionally launching an
attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or
injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term
and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly
excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage
anticipated, with respect to the artillery attack and air strikes on Kebia
between 17 and 18 July 2009.
This counsel submits that the elements of this count are not sufficiently
satisfied, as there are no proof beyond reasonable doubt that covers every
element required.
Your excellencies, according to the elements of crime, there are five
elements which are required to indict the defendant.
i.
ii.
5
a. Identifying the civilian object/military object
i.
Article 13 of Protocol II 1977 (which regulates the
protection of civilians in non international armed conflict)
provides
the
protection
of
civilians
from
military
objects.
The BAS Factory does not provide any necessities that are
essential to the civilian population. It produces metal
objects that are not indispensible to the survival of the
civilian population. At the time in question,the BAS Factory
had changed its status from a civ object, to military
object. The Military Objective is to destroy a military
iii.
iii.
relatively close
The military advantage would be to recapture Kiesh. In
light of the car bombings taking place in the AAFcontrolled Kebia and the artillery attacks in Rica, it is
6
submitted that winning the war and minimizing the deaths
and damage to civilians and civilian objects would be
included in the military advantage.
d. Principle of Proportionality
i.
The Commentary to Protocol II and the Preamble states
that it is an inherent principle of ICC to adhere to
ii.
proportionality.
Both the attack on the BAS Factory and the Peace Garden
iii.
iv.
v.
fire)
Galic highlights that it is important to measure the guilt of
the perpetrator bearing in mind his state of mind. It is
submitted that in General Reeds perspective and his state
of knowledge indicated that the attack he had intended
was in fact not excessive as his overall military advantage
was to stop the war, and that there were relevant
precautions taken such as the collection of information
and relied on the information of his BEST INTELLIGENCE,
Perry Ash who is the Head Of National Intelligence, and
the switching of artillery attacks to drones. Paragaph 26
(Availability of evacuation site)
7
Your excellencies in relation
The next element :
iii.
If there are no further questions from the bench, this counsel would like to
present his final submission which is that in the event that the court should find
that the elements are satisfied, this counsel would like to submit that General
Reed should be afforded the defence of:
iv.
criminal
responsibility
if
it
negates
the
mental