0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
6 просмотров3 страницы
1) The defendant admits to borrowing PHP 500,000 from the plaintiff on February 14, 2000 and that the loan was payable within one year. However, the defendant denies the genuineness of the alleged promissory note.
2) Upon maturity of the loan, the defendant was unable to pay but admitted to the plaintiff's demand for payment. The defendant asked for a one-year extension to settle the loan due to an upcoming anniversary celebration.
3) The defendant denies ignoring repeated demands for payment from the plaintiff and claims to have only asked for an extension to settle the obligation. The defendant requests that the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with costs and claims PHP 150,000 in damages for the inconvenience caused
1) The defendant admits to borrowing PHP 500,000 from the plaintiff on February 14, 2000 and that the loan was payable within one year. However, the defendant denies the genuineness of the alleged promissory note.
2) Upon maturity of the loan, the defendant was unable to pay but admitted to the plaintiff's demand for payment. The defendant asked for a one-year extension to settle the loan due to an upcoming anniversary celebration.
3) The defendant denies ignoring repeated demands for payment from the plaintiff and claims to have only asked for an extension to settle the obligation. The defendant requests that the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with costs and claims PHP 150,000 in damages for the inconvenience caused
1) The defendant admits to borrowing PHP 500,000 from the plaintiff on February 14, 2000 and that the loan was payable within one year. However, the defendant denies the genuineness of the alleged promissory note.
2) Upon maturity of the loan, the defendant was unable to pay but admitted to the plaintiff's demand for payment. The defendant asked for a one-year extension to settle the loan due to an upcoming anniversary celebration.
3) The defendant denies ignoring repeated demands for payment from the plaintiff and claims to have only asked for an extension to settle the obligation. The defendant requests that the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with costs and claims PHP 150,000 in damages for the inconvenience caused
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT 7th Judicial Region Branch 55 Cebu City RONALD, plaintif FOR: COLLECTION OF SUM OF MONEY, DAMAGES and ATTORNEYS FEES - versus -
ARNOLD, defendant
ANSWER
COME NOW DEFENDANT ARNOLD, thru the undersigned
counsel, unto the Honorable Court, respectfully avers the following facts to-wit: 1. On February 14, 2000, the defendant borrowed money from the plaintif amounting to FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (PHP 500,000.00) payable within a period of one year; Defendant admits to the allegations of paragraph 1. 2. Plaintif asked defendant to execute and sign a promissory note specifying the amount loaned and the one-year maturity date (Annex A Promissory Note); Defendant specifically denies under oath the genuineness and due execution of the alleged promissory note in paragraph 3 of the plaintifs complaint. 3. Upon the maturity of the loan and Plaintifs demand, Defendant was not able to pay the said loan; Defendant admits to the allegations of paragraph 4.
ANSWER Page | 2
4. Defendant Arnold refused to pay the said loan and
insisted that he be given a period of one-year to settle the same by reason of his upcoming Silver Wedding Anniversary; Defendant admits to the allegations of paragraph 5. 5. In spite of repeated written and oral demands made by Plaintif Roland, Defendant Arnold ignored the same and still refused to settle his indebtedness; Defendant denies the allegations of paragraph 7 as he did not ignore the repeated oral and written demands made by plaintif and denies his refusal to settle his obligation since he only asked for an extension of its settlement. PRAYER WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, 1. The plaintifs complaint be dismissed with costs against the plaintif. 2. Damages be awarded to him for the inconvenience the baseless complaint has caused which amounts to ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS (PHP 150,000.00) Defendant prays for such other relief that is just and reasonable under the premises. Cebu City, Philippines. February 27, 2005.
ATTY. AMARYLISS A. BIAO
Roll No. 78789 MCLE Compliance Certificate No. IV-0007554 IBP No. 988888, issued on Jan. 2, 2004 PTR No. 4656898, issued on January 8, 2004 Holy Family Village I Banilad, Mandaue City, Cebu, Philippines COPY FURNISHED:
ANSWER Page | 3
ATTY. SIP YAT
Counsel for Plaintif Rm. 4, Big Bldg., Brgy. Tisa, Cebu City