Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0022--4898(94)00025-5
LATERAL
TYRE DYNAMIC
CHARACTERISTICS
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Q
Cc
Cr
C.
E1
F,,
h
k
K
Kf
n
q~
qy
T
g
W
X
Y
Y~
Yp
Yt
Yr
Greek letters
Ol
~o
q)
(7*
slip angle
circular frequency
spin (derivative of yaw angle ~p with respect to the length of wheel path S)
relaxation length of tyre
friction coefficient
396
C. Peng et al.
INTRODUCTION
The study of the lateral behaviour of tyres originated with the investigation of the
shimmy phenomenon in the 1930s [1]. Many attempts have been made to develop a
mathematical model of a pneumatic tyre, particularly with regard to its lateral
load-deflection relationship, to describe the steady-state behaviour of the tyre. Fiala
proposed a spring-supported ring model for the tyre structure [2]. The tread band was
represented as a beam. Using elasticity and beam-bending theory, he calculated the
tyre lateral force and produced an implicit function for an exact solution. Approximation was applied so that suitable values of the model parameters could be obtained to
give reasonable agreement with experiment. In the same year, Fromm offered a
"brush" model, with an elastic tread band and rigid carcass. With this simple model
he obtained the same expression as Fiala [3]. Pacejka [4] introduced a stretched string
model. He introduced the concept of relaxation length and deduced the non-steadystate response afterwards. Beam and spring models have been effectively used in
vehicle steering and shimmy analysis [4-10].
Instead of deriving lateral characteristics from a physical model, spring-damper
models are widely used in vehicle dynamics simply because they are consistent with
the other elements of the vehicle model. Traditionally, tyre dynamics are modelled as
a parallel spring and a viscous damper (called the classic model). However, prediction
of root-mean-square acceleration (r.m.s.) may be very poor using this model [11].
Lines [12, 13] introduced a spring-damper model which consists of a viscous damper,
representing the interaction between the tyre and ground, in series with a parallel
spring and viscous damper for the characteristics of the tyre carcass (called the
visco-plastic model). Crolla et a l . [11] used a similar tyre model but ignored the
damping of the tyre carcass (called the Maxwell model) in their simulation of vehicle
vibration. Their simulation showed improved results using this model compared with
using the classic model.
In addition to analytical models, an empirical approach has been applied in many
cases. Several forms of mathematical expression have been employed to produce good
agreement with measured results. Pottinger and Fairlie [1] used linear regression in
processing their results of tyre lateral force as a function of slip angle and camber
angle. Maalej et al. [14] introduced a third-order polynomial form of model to
represent experimental measurements of lateral tyre force. Bakker et a l . [15]
presented a model using a sine function. Guo and Liu [10] have used an exponential
tyre model in simulating vehicle handling behaviour.
For off-road tyres, such as agricultural tyres, McAllister [16] introduced an
exponential model based on his field experiments on agricultural tyres. The tyre
parameters were expressed in the form of a Mobility Number. When a longitudinal
force is exerted, such as a braking or driving force, and is combined with a lateral
force, tyre lateral characteristics will change. Some details of this can be found in refs
[10] and [17].
In this paper, we review previous analytical models of lateral tyre characteristics
and introduce a lateral tyre dynamic model with the validation against experimental
measurements.
397
authors uses physical models to represent tyre behaviour, such as the well known
beam model [2] and the string model [4]. For these models, a description of the
contact area and stress distribution is important. Others express tyre characteristics as
a combination of linear springs and viscous dampers.
-nFy
y -
(1 - n2x2).
(1)
2k
Assuming a parabolic distribution of contact pressure, integrated over adhesion and
sliding area, the total lateral force can be expressed as
Fv" -
1 + ,~,la/312Ca2 tan cr -
+ 8c3a4tan 3 o:(4~qzmaxb +
B
AFy],
(2)
where A, B, Co and ~ are model factors (for details refer to ref. [2]).
Since the solution of this equation is only possible by trial and error methods,
approximation has to be applied. An approximation, which is widely used in vehicle
handling studies, is
Fy
where ~ = K tan
~2
2~3,
o~/(gW).
\
,,,
",
YT"W
/ /
(3)
398
C. Peng et al.
The beam model has been effectively used in vehicle cornering analysis [10, 18].
This model is derived fundamentally for the steady state. No publication has been
found using this beam model to describe the non-steady-state lateral behaviour of
tyres. A further approximation could be made. When the slip angle is small it can be
represented as
tan o: ~- -"f- .
V
(4)
Fy = c 2 ,
(5)
where
C _ K
V
K2
K3
@)2.
27V3/t2W 2
3V31,W"
32
Yc
8x 2
2~2Vc
Crc~
~x 2
32
02
Yc
Dx 2
Yc
_ qY
Cc
- Yc = - ( 1 - ~,2)y
Yc = 0
in sliding zone,
(6)
in adhesion zone,
(7)
un-contact part,
(8)
where o, crc and e are functions of the tension force in the strings and the stiffness of
the tread rubber and carcass.
Once the deflection of the tyre is known, the cornering force Fy can be calculated
by integration over the contact area. As an example, Pacejka calculated the lateral
-,,2
~ ~ ( c o n t a c t
crosscord
length)
399
force of the string model with and without a tread element under completely adhesive
conditions, i.e. when the coefficient of friction was large or the slip angle tended to
zero [4]. The lateral force then becomes:
F,, = Cf~" a',
(9)
where Cf~ is a constant of the tyre structure (for details refer to ref. [4]).
For the non-steady-state characteristics of tyres, the transfer function between
lateral force F>, and slip angle c~ is described as [5]
Fy ( s ) =
2(0 + a) -
1 + os + 1 e -2sa
(10)
Cf,~
a-
Cf~q~ +
Cf+
qb,
(11)
where Cf., Cf+, Cf~, and Cf+ are factors of the tyre carcass and contact length of
footprint.
Goraj [20] approximated the response to a lateral force by neglecting the dimensions of the contact area. The response to lateral force then reads:
Y (s)Fy
Cf.
(12)
l + so
Owen and Bernard [9] showed that the differential equation when neglecting the
contact length can be written as a first-order lag:
Fv = -C,0:"
o/~,
V
(13)
y"
Based on the string concept and the solution of the tyre lateral response to a
sinusoidal input, Ellis [21] indicated that the non-steady-state solution of the string
model could be written as:
Ev = C ( o ~ - B&),
(14)
where B and C are constants.
The string model has been used effectively in the study of the directional dynamics
and shimmy of vehicles [4-9]. It is mathematically simpler than the beam model,
which can be seen from the following load intensity equations:
String m o d e l
-T
d2y + ky = qy(X),
(15)
dx 2
Beam model
E1 d4y + k y = qy(X).
(16)
dx 4
However, the exact solution of the string model is still too complicated to be used in
practice so some approximations have to be made. The solutions from these
C. Peng et al.
400
approximations are dependent upon the description of the contact area (refer to
equations (11)-(14)).
Spring-damper model
Models using spring and damper characteristics are widely used in the study of
vehicle dynamics and vibration as their elements are the same as those used in vehicle
models. Traditionally, tyre characteristics are represented by a classic model (parallel
spring and viscous damper). However this model showed very poor prediction of root
mean square (r.m.s.) accelerations [11]. Attempts were made to improve simulation
with different models.
Based on his measurements, Lines [12] described the lateral force as a linear
function of slip angle a, for small angles, as
E,. = C , . a~.
(17)
C2 -
C~
V
(19)
When the carcass characteristics are modeled as a Kelvin unit (parallel spring and
viscous damper), the complete lateral tyre model can be expressed as a viscous
damper in series with a Kelvin unit [13] (in this paper called the visco-plastic model)
shown in Fig. 3. With this model the lateral tyre characteristics can be expressed as
Fig. 3. Visco-plasticmodel.
(20)
401
where k is the stiffness of the tyre carcass, C1 is the viscous damping of the tyre
carcass and C2 is the viscous damping for the road-tyre interface.
Crolla et al. [11] used a simplified model (spring and damper in series) to represent
lateral and longitudinal tyre behaviour. They demonstrated this model in another
way. Dynamically, a finite time is required for a change in slip angle to produce a
lateral force. This can be modelled as a first-order lag, and thus equation (17)
becomes
17"1~y q- Fy = C.ol.
(21)
(22)
This is equivalent to equation (21). Thus, the lateral tyre behaviour can be modelled
as a spring and damper in series (Maxwell model), as shown in Fig. 4.
These new spring-damper models, the visco-plastic model and Maxwell model, lack
justification against dynamic measurements of tyres. It is interesting to compare these
models with the solutions from the string model in terms of their differential
equations. Comparing equations (21) and (13), they are mathematically identical. This
indicates that the Maxwell model is equivalent to the string model with the
assumption of zero contact length.
If the effect of spin ~ and the rate of spin ~ can be neglected, then the third and
fourth items on the right-hand side of equation (11) are omitted; it becomes
Zp.
V
Cfa .
y q- Fy = CfolOl - --Ol.v
(24)
402
C. Peng et al.
Comparing the right-hand sides of equations (20) and (24), the string model with the
assumption of a parabolic contact curve can be interpreted as a viscous damper in
series with a Kelvin unit which has a negative damping coefficient.
Beam and string models can provide some physical interpretation of the tyre
behaviour, but their exact solutions are too complicated to be used in practice.
Certain approximations have to be employed. The accuracy is dependent upon the
shape of the contact area. If we express lateral tyre behaviour in terms of springs and
dampers, then the beam model acts as a non-linear viscous damper with a velocitydependent coefficient; the string model behaves as a viscous damper in series with a
spring or a viscous damper in series with a Kelvin unit which has a negative damping
coefficient.
Spring-damper models can be used conveniently in vehicle dynamics simulations
and have the potential to improve the prediction significantly. They are compatible
with the string model. Further experimental and theoretical work is needed to
develop them.
(25)
).
+ -Yr
-(ltO
Fy
(26)
The first item on the right-hand side is the response of the tyre carcass, and the
second the response due to t y r e - r o a d interaction. This indicates that lateral tyre
response is the combination of the response of the tyre carcass and the response of
t y r e - r o a d interaction.
Response of tyre-road interaction
Under the action of lateral force, the wheel centre will shift laterally due to the
elasticity of the tyre carcass. For lateral vibration of a non-rolling tyre, the tyre wilt
oscillate about a fixed contact patch. When the tyre is rolling, a new part of the tyre
tread band is constantly coming into the contact area. In the adhesion zone at the
front of the contact area, no sliding occurs and the wheel movement appears to be
pure rolling along the track of the distorted tyre tread band. Therefore, the tyre will
shift laterally the further along the track it rolls. When lateral load is applied on a
403
Y~
II~.( ,,..II~l
//
area
L
I
i
(-- -~
l@
I
I
I
XXX XXX
XXX
rolling tyre, the tyre will roll a distance laterally due to the distorted tyre carcass.
When the lateral load is released, the tyre will remain in that position and not roll
back to the original position.
Considering a wheel rolling at angular speed f~ with effective rolling radius r0, the
lateral rolled distance Yr at time t can be written
t
yr=/itanolf2rodt=fotano~Vdt.
(27)
The angle c~ is a function of lateral force, the structural properties of the tyre carcass
and properties of the road surface.
Taking the Fourier transform of both sides, we get
o~(yr) = ~
Vtan0cdt
) = 1 .~(VtanaO,
(28)
I(D
and
Yr.(iw) -
~(Yr) _ 1 ~(Vtan0)
Fy
UP(Fy)
iw
5;(Fy)
(29)
404
C. Peng et al.
Using the measurements by McAllister [16], when the angle o: is small, the lateral
force F~, is proportional to angle or, and it can be written as
Fv = C~ol.
(30)
oc-
Fv
(31)
Ca"
Under the condition of constant travel speed V, we get
,~(Vtan0l)_
V .
(Fy)
Ca
(32)
Substituting equation (32) into equation (29); the response of tyre-road interaction
(second item on the right-hand side of equation (26)) can be written as
Yr (i~) -
(33)
(35)
Therefore
yt (it0) _
1
(36)
Fy
K + ih"
It would be helpful to have a clear understanding of the physical mechanism of
deformation of the tyre carcass rubber in terms of its molecular structure. Viscous
405
damping was designed originally for viscous fluids and is used widely in engineering
practice because of its simplicity of mathematical expression and physical representation. However, rubber is different from viscous fluids. From the point of view of
molecular structure, rubber is not the same as either a liquid or a metal solid. Liquid
has a molecular structure with free molecules, while metal has a crystallized molecular
structure. Rubber consists of convoluted long-chain molecules interlinked with each
other. Under an extension force, rubber deforms differently from both metal and
liquid. The molecular chains partly uncurl as they are stretched. When the force is
released, the molecular chain will try to return to the original distorted shape, which
will take time and cause a time delay. Therefore, the damping could be expected to
be more dependent on the displacement than the velocity. This is thought to be the
reason why rubber damping is different from that of the viscous damper.
As the purpose of this paper is tyre lateral modelling, it is not proposed to
investigate rubber's molecular structure more deeply here. The authors would be
pleased if the discussion in this paper of the hysteretic damping of tyre carcass rubber
provides improved understanding, and expect that further work on the molecular
structure of rubber may provide an adequate explanation.
(37)
l lVy
IY
c. Peng et al.
406
J]) = 2~
Cr
(38)
These two asymptotes represent a viscous damper with damping coefficient Cr, and a
parallel spring K and hysteretic damper h, respectively. Below the corner frequency
f0, the model behaves like a viscous damper, whose amplitude ratio is a straight line
with a slope - 2 0 dB per decade. Above this frequency, it behaves more like a
parallel spring and hysteretic damper, its amplitude ratio being a constant. This
implies that at frequencies well above the corner frequency f0, the tyre carcass
characteristics are dominant, and the lateral tyre characteristics can be simplified to a
parallel spring and hysteretic damper. At very low frequencies, where road-tyre
interaction is most important, tyre lateral behaviour can be approximated simply as a
viscous damper.
It appears that the tyre carcass and the interaction of tyre and ground are two key
aspects of tyre lateral characteristics. These two aspects dominate tyre lateral
behaviour within high- and low-frequency regions independently. Therefore for some
particular applications, for instance the simulation of steering and handling, a simple
tyre lateral model that only represents the interaction between the tyre and ground
could be employed with reasonable accuracy.
Using these two simple models (shown in Fig. 8), i.e. a viscous damper at
frequencies below the corner frequency f0, and a parallel spring and hysteretic
damper at frequencies above the corner frequency to approximate the tyre character-
dB -80
-90
- -
-100
'l
-II0
[
I
-120
10 -2
1
fo
10
Frequency
102
(Hz)
Fig. 7. Amplitude ratio (A.R.) of proposed model with the asymptotes and corner frequency )~,
K = 260 kNm-1, h = 20 kNm -I, Cr = 300 kNsm -~.
407
Fy
Fy
(~
IY
//
Fig. 8. Two simple models for lateral tyre characteristicsat low- and high-frequencyrange.
istics, the maximum amplitude ratio (dB) difference between the proposed model and
these two approximations is given at corner frequency f0 (in Fig. 7) by
(39)
According to Gehman [26], the ratio of the loss modulus to storage modulus of tyre
tread rubber is usually found in the range 0.1-0.2. Taking the ratio of hysteretic
damping h to stiffness K as 0.2, the difference in the amplitude ratio will be 3.87 dB.
If we use the Maxwell model (series spring and damper, shown in Fig. 4) as an
approximation around the corner frequency f0, then the amplitude ratio difference
between the proposed model and the Maxwell model at the corner frequency is given
by
1 + _h + h 2
K
2K 2
A n . R . (dB) = 10 log
(40)
h2
I+-K2
Using a ratio of 0.2 between the hysteretic damping h and the stiffness K, the
maximum difference between their predictions will be 0.694 dB.
For a simple vehicle model, the body is generally simplified as a rigid block, as
shown in Fig. 9. The motion equation of this model can be written as (for details
refer to Appendix B in ref. [27])
M _d3y
+ MK
_
_ _ + ih d2y + (K + ih) dY
dt 3
C
dt 2
dt
where M is the mass of the vehicle.
dFy
dt
K_._.._++
ih F,,,
C
(41)
C. Peng et al.
408
Fy
II h
_L
XXXX~ XXX~4
Fig. 9. Simplifiedlateral vehicle model.
This is not an ordinary second-order system, as is found from the vehicle vertical
model. The left-hand side of equation (41) includes a third-order term and the
right-hand side has a term representing the rate of change of lateral tyre force with
time. This is caused by the viscous damping being connected in series rather than in
parallel as in the ordinary system. Its transfer function becomes
l+i
h + C(o
K
~ (i~o) =
-M~2 - h c) + i[C'(
(42)
M oJ, ) _ h M~o2]
When damping C for the interaction between tyre and ground is very large, the
transfer function can be approximated as
Y(io)) =
F~,
(43)
-Mo) 2 + K + i h
When the ratio of damping h to stiffness K for the tyre carcass is very small, this can
be approximated as
l+i-Y~(i~) =
F,
Cto
K
(44)
409
Model validation
A set of experiments were carried out using the dynamic tyre testing vehicle at the
Silsoe Research Institute, shown in Fig. 10. This machine is designed especially for
investigating rolling tyre dynamic behaviour [28]. The tyre under test was excited by
the vibration of an inertial mass. It can vibrate the tyre in the vertical, lateral or
longitudinal directions, while the tyre is rolling on different surfaces, such as highway,
farm track or soft soil. Tyre vertical load, inflation pressure, travel speed and driving
or braking torque can be changed according to the requirements of the experiment.
The measured force and acceleration signals are stored on magnetic tape and then
replayed to estimate the tyre frequency response functions.
The model parameters, stiffness and damping, were estimated by means of a
best-fitting technique applied to the measured frequency response function of lateral
tyre acceleration to the lateral ground force. The best-fitting technique provides the
best value of the parameters that the model could obtain. The lateral ground force of
tyre, Fyground, is obtained by subtracting the inertial force, M . ~, from the lateral
force on the wheel axle, Fyaxle:
Fyground --" Fyaxle - M" ~.
Typical results of measured and predicted lateral tyre frequency response functions at
travel speeds of 5 and 10kmh -1 are collected together (Figs 11 and 12). The real
parts of the frequency response for all tyre models show good agreement with the
experimental measurements, the proposed tyre model and visco-plastic model showing
better agreement. Comparing the imaginary part of the measured frequency response
function, the visco-plastic model showed an over-estimation, whereas the Maxwell
model showed over-estimation and under-estimation at the frequencies above and
410
C. Peng et al.
classic model
c,
0 ~ - - -
....
Maxwell model
visco-plastic model
proposed model
measured
0 005
0 004
-0 004 [
Z
,4~
~ooo~
c,
2
0 003
/
E
" -0 012 !
"!~a. ~-
0 002
jl
.%-?
ii
0016[
-002
0
~
2
L
4
frequency
~
6
__
0 001
':']l
"/
~=~~~
~- ~
[
8
frequency
(Hz)
(Hz)
Fig. 11. Experimental measurements and model predictions of lateral tyre acceleration response to lateral
ground force, at travel speed of 5 kmh -~ .
....
--
~,,
measured
0 005 I - -
....
~ 1
classic model
Maxwell model
visco-plastic model
proposed model
~1 i~I i
"-4',~ ,-
-0 004 !
0 004
k
<~ -0 008
<~ 0 003
e~
E
0002
E
~0 012
i
0016
O"
,, c,~
E
0 001
J J ~- -o o ~ - ' ~
-0 02
frequency
(Hz)
0,
frequency
(Hz)
Fig. 12. Experimental measurements and model predictions of lateral tyre acceleration response to lateral
ground force, at travel speed of 10 km h -t.
below 4 Hz. The proposed tyre model showed better agreement over the whole range
of testing frequency.
Figures 11 and 12 present lateral acceleration response to the lateral ground force,
which removes the effect of the inertial mass of the wheel. Taking account of the
mass of the wheel, the force then represents the lateral force acting at the wheel axle,
which can be obtained from the measured signals. Comparisons were made between
the measured results and predictions from the tyre models (Figs 13 and 14). The
results showed that the classical and the visco-plastic models over-estimated the
411
classic model
Maxwell model
visco-plastic m o d e l
-
proposed model
measured
,, ,--~ , <7"~,,=,
180
002
0 016
Z"
to
E oo12
"o
v
i,~,:li
o)
~,~
E
i / '~'~,'!!
0 008
o 004
,:
....
%.,' .
't,,
'::~
1.
frequency
90
(Hz)
frequency
(Hz)
Fig. 13. Experimental measurements and model predictions of lateral tyre acceleration response to lateral
force exerted on wheel axle, at travel speed of 5 k m h - ~ .
classic model
Maxwell
model
visco-plastie m o d e l
proposed model
measured
0 02
I-
.5
::
Z'0
016
i/ !i'b
E
0012
;iI
ID
~
E
0 008
<
~ If,'
90
13_
0 004
= .; c. -7.-,~e.e~,.
0
2
frequency
(Hz)
L
0
i
2
frequency
(Hz)
Fig. 14. Experimental measurements and model predictions of lateral tyre acceleration response to lateral
force exerted on wheel axle, at travel speed of 10 k m h -~ .
lateral tyre response and the Maxwell model provided under-estimation. The proposed tyre model offered the best prediction of the amplitude ratio and phase angle.
The relative prediction error of the amplitude ratio from these models is shown in
Table 1.
Assessment of the tyre models was also undertaken against acceleration in the time
domain. Experiments were conducted with a lateral sinusoidal vibration at frequency
2.73 Hz while the tyre travelled straight forwards. They were conducted near the
resonant frequency (about 3.3 Hz) in order to better observe agreement of the
models. The model parameters were estimated from a separate experiment of
412
C. Peng et al.
Table 1. Relative error of the amplitude ratio predictions from the tyre models
Inflation
pressure (bar)
Travel speed
(kmh ')
1.28
53
10
225
-63
-45
199
53
- IO
12
114
178
-44
-26
lO0
164
- 11
10
5
82
74
-51
- 18
86
47
- 15
19
1.7
2.4
i0
25
1000
to
I,..
0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
600
200
"4
-200
-600
~2
-1000
4.0
4.4
4.8
5.2
5.6
6.0
3.0
,0
IX
fX
!i.,
1.8
..~
c}
0.6
v
-0,6
-1.s
--3.0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.0
4.4
4.8
5.2
5.6
time
....
measured
Maxwell
---
model
proposed
6.0
(sec,)
classical
model
viscoplastic
model
model
Fig. 15. Lateral tyre acceleration response of the measurement and predictions from the models.
413
therefore be expected that the proposed tyre model would improve vehicle vibration
simulation when incorporated in a vehicle model.
The assessment of the proposed tyre model with the measurements indicated that
the introduction of hysteretic damping in parallel with a spring is a good representation of the characteristics of the tyre carcass. Together with a viscous damper for the
interaction between the tyre and ground, they provide a model for the lateral tyre
characteristics. The assessments proved that the proposed model represents the lateral
tyre characteristics well. The proposed model improved the vibration prediction when
it was incorporated into a single-degree-of-freedom system compared with the
performance of previous tyre models. Further work is necessary to evaluate the
proposed model when applied to the simulation of vehicle ride vibration.
CONCLUSION
Tyre models based on physical approximations, such as beam or string models,
require integration over the contact area. The curvature of contact has a large effect
on the solution. Moreover, the exact solutions of these models are either implicit
functions or are too complicated to be applied in vehicle dynamics.
Recently introduced spring-damper models are convenient for use in the simulation
of vehicle dynamics. The comparison of their mathematical expressions shows that
they are compatible with the string model under certain conditions. The beam model
acts as a non-linear viscous damper with a velocity-dependent coefficient; the string
model behaves like a viscous damper in series with a spring or in series with a Kelvin
unit which has a negative damping coefficient.
The proposed lateral tyre model employs a parallel spring and hysteretic damping
to represent the tyre carcass, in series with a viscous damper representing interaction
at the contact patch. The experimental results showed that this tyre model improved
the agreement between prediction and measurement compared with the other
spring-damper models. It could be expected that this proposed tyre model may be
used in modelling longitudinal tyre characteristics.
REFERENCES
[1] M. G. Pottinger and A. M. Fairlie, Characteristics of tire force and moment data. Tire Science and
Technology, TSTCA 17, 15-51 (1989).
[2] E. Fiala, Seitenkr~ifte am Rollenden Luftreifen. Z. VD1 96, 973-979 (Lateral forces on rolling
pneumatic tyres, internal translation, Silsoe Research Institute, Silsoe, U.K.) (1954).
[3] S. K. Clark (Ed.), Mechanics of Pneumatic Tires. U.S. Department of Transportation, National
Highway Traffic Administration, Washington, DC (1981).
[4] H. B. Pacejka, The wheel shimmy phenomenon. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft,
The Netherlands (1966).
[5] H. B. Pacejka, Analysis of the dynamic response of a rolling string-type tire model to lateral
wheel-plane vibrations. Vehicle System Dynamics 1, 37-66 (1972).
[6] H. B. Pacejka, Lateral dynamics of road vehicles. Advanced Vehicle System Dynamics, pp. 75-120
(1986).
[7] R. S. Sharp and C. J. Jones, A comparison of tyre representation in a simple wheel shimmy problem.
Vehicle System Dynamics 9, 45-57 (1980).
[8] R. S. Sharp and C. J. Alstead, The influence of structural flexibilities on the straight running stability
in motorcycles. Vehicle System Dynamics 9,327-357 (1980).
[9] R. H. Owen and J. E. Bernard, Directional dynamics of a tractor-load-backhoe. Vehicle System
Dynamics 11, 251-265 (1982).
414
C. Peng et al.
[10] Guo Kong-Hui and Yun-Bo Liu, Simulation of cornering properties of a vehicle over the whole range
of working conditions. SAE P-212, Proc. Fourth Int. Pacific Conf. on Automotive Engineering,
Melbourne, Australia, pp. 154.1-158.1 (1987).
[11] D. A. Crolla, D. N. Horton and R. M. Stayner, Effect of tyre modelling on tractor ride vibration
predictions. J. Agric. Engng Res. 47, 55-77 (1990).
[12] J. A. Lines, Ride vibration of agricultural tractors: transfer functions between the ground and the
tractor body. J. Agric. Engng Res. 37, 81-91 (1987).
[13] J. A. Lines, The suspension characteristics of agricultural tractor lyres. Ph.D. Thesis, Silsoe College,
Cranfield Institute of Technology, U.K. (1991).
[14] A. Y. Maalej, D. A. Guenther and J. R. Ellis, Experimental development of tyre force and moment
models. Int. J. Vehicle Design 10,223-248 (1989).
[15] E. Bakker, H. B. Pacejka and L. Linder, A new tire model with an application in vehicle dynamic
studies. SAE P-221, Autotechnologies Conf. and Expositions, Monte Carlo, Monaco, pp. 83-95 (1989).
[161 M. McAIlister, Forces on undriven angled wheels. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. of International Society .fbr
Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Cambridge, U.K. (1984).
[17] D. A. Crolla and A. S. A. EI-Razaz, A review of the combined lateral and longitudinal force of tyre
on deformed surface. J. Terramechanics 24, 199-225 (1987).
[18] S. Yamazaki, S. Ogasawara and T. Akasaka, Lateral stiffness of radial tyres and effect of lowering
aspect ratio, lnt. J. Vehicle Design 9,318-333 (1988).
[19] H. B. Pacejka, Modelling of the pneumatic tire and its impact on vehicle dynamic behaviour. Lecture
Notes, V2.03, CCG Lecture Series V, Vehicle Technology, 30 September-2 October 1985, Oberpfaffenhofen (1985).
[20] Z. J. Goraj, Self-excited vibrations of the tire. Vehicle System Dynamics 11,345-362 ([982).
[21] J. R. Ellis, Vehicle Dynamics. London Business Book, London (1969).
[22] H. B. Pacejka, Lateral dynamics of road vehicles. Advanced Vehicle System Dynamics, pp. 75-120
(1986).
[23] C. M. Harris, Shock and Vibration Handbook, Third edn. McGraw-Hill, NY (1988).
[24] A. B. Davey and A. R. Payne, Rubber in Engineering Practice. Maclaren & Son, London (1964).
[25] L. R. G. Treloar, The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Second edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
(1967).
[26] S. D. Gehman, Rubber structure and properties, in Mechanics of Pneumatic 7"ires, S.K. Clark (Ed.),
Chap. I. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Administration, Washington,
DC (1981).
[27] C. Peng, The lateral dynamic characteristics of agricultural tyres. Ph.D. Thesis, Silsoe College,
Cranfield Institute of Technology, Silsoe, U.K. (1993).
[28] J. A. Lines and N. A. Young, A machine for measuring the suspension characteristics of agricultural
lyres. J. Terramechanics 26, 201-21[) (1989).