Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
LOW EMISSION
TECHNOLOGY
he mathematic simulation of
combustor operation is widely
used now. Due to the mathematic
simulation the influence of design and
operating factors on the combustor basic
characteristics can be investigated, the
improvement methods can be developed
thus decreasing the volume of the
experimental researches. The mathematic
simulation is the advanced method though
the calculations are complicated and
Figure 2. The longitudinal section of annular mixing area (one of the variants)
16
s (f fk)
Table 1
Table 2
Vn dS
Vn dS
17
mixing degree
0.12
mixing degree
0.12
0.1
0.1
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.02
2
4
6
number of annular channel sections, n
2
4
6
number of annular channel sections, n
b)
c)
Figure 6. Design area section (a);
flow field in the longitudinal section (b);
temperature field in the longitudinal section (c)
received at the calculation of gas turbine nominal mode
with 5% of fuel supply to the pilot area
18
HTTP://WWW.GTT.RU/EN
is also given.
Variant 5 was tested at the All-Russian
Thermal Engineering Institute test
bench. The temperature field values at
the outlet received via the design and
experiment are given in figure 8. The
temperature field was measured in the gas
collector outlet section using 20 thermal
couples located in 5 rows each of 4 thermal
couples.
HTTP://WWW.GTT.RU/EN
b)
Table 3
Variant
Temperature
difference
out.
n = 6; d = 16 mm
1.3
n = 4; d = 20 mm
1.29
n = 2; d = 18 mm
and n = 1; d = 21.5 mm;
n = 2; d = 22 mm
and n = 1; d = 17.5 mm
1.234
n = 2; d = 20 mm;
n = 2; d = 25 mm
1.23
n = 2; d = 18 mm;
n = 2; d = 22 mm
1.13
Figure 8.
Temperature field values
at the combustor gas collector
outlet:
a) received via the design
experiment;
b) received via the numerical
investigations
b)
P, kPa
Lmax, mm
Hmax, mm
Mrecirc., %
NOx, ppm
30
111
175
80
3.1
26.2
111
172
84
7.78
30
849
155
70
2.87
40.8
849
150
9.46
20
HTTP://WWW.GTT.RU/EN
HTTP://WWW.GTT.RU/EN
5% of fuel
to the central nozzle
P = 111 kP
P = 849 kP
P = 849 kP
b)
P = 111 kP
References
1. Matthias Kern Chair of Combustion
Technology, Engler-Bunte-Institute University of
Karlsruhe (TN)
Paris Fokaides, Peter Habisreuther, Nikolaos
Zarzalis Chair of Combustion Technology,
Engler-Bunte-Institute University of Karlsruhe
2-DOMAIN-1-STEP-KINETIK
TURBULENT REACTION MODEL FOR
THE SIMULATION OF A LIFTED SWIRL
FLAME. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air GT 2009
June 8-12, 2009, Orlando, Florida, USA.
2. Gutnik M.N., Vasiliev V.D., Bulysova
L.A. Design and experimental investigations
of low emission combustor for gas turbine
packages//Abstracts of the scientific seminar
The low emission combustors for gas turbine
packages: development experience, problems and
outlooks. Moscow, CIAM All-Russian Thermal
Engineering Institute, 2004. pp. 36-37.
3. Gutnik M.N., Tumanovsky A.G. The
possibilities of high temperature low emission
combustor development for stationary gas turbine
30% of fuel
to the central nozzle
c)
P = 849 kP
100%
Ne
P = 111 kP
Figure 9. Flow field (a); temperature field (b); fuel combustion field (c)
in the low emission combustor longitudinal section
21