Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
of Chemical
Engineering
ISSN 0104-6632
Printed in Brazil
www.abeq.org.br/bjche
Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
Abstract - Heat transfer during the freezing of guava pulp conditioned in large containers such as in stacked
boxes (34 L) and buckets (20 L) and unstacked drums (200 L) is discussed. The air velocities across the crosssection of the tunnel were measured, and the values in the outlet of the evaporator were used as the initial
conditions in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The model tested was turbulent standard k.
The CFD-generated convective heat transfer coefficients were mapped on the surfaces for each configuration
and used in procedures for the calculation of freezing-time estimates. These estimates were compared with the
experimental results for validation. The results showed that CFD determined representative coefficients and
produced good correlations between the predicted and experimental values when applied to the freezing-time
estimates for the box and drum configurations. The errors depended on the configuration and the adopted
mesh (3-D grid) construction.
Keywords: CFD; Airflow; Heat transfer; Fruit pulp; Freezing time.
INTRODUCTION
In Brazil, fruit pulp falls into the important
category of frozen foodstuffs that are used as raw
materials for ice cream, yogurt and jelly production.
The freezing method used in the processing of guava
is typically implemented in small agro industries. In
these installations, the power consumption related to
the freezing time is an important factor because it
increases the overall production costs. Fruit pulps are
packaged in a variety of package types and sizes, and
a large increase in the production and consumption
of fruit pulps has been recorded over the last decade.
In industrial situations, the process of freezing fruit
pulp inside boxes, buckets and drums that contain
large amounts of product can be very complex. The
homogeneity of the product is not guaranteed; voids
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
812
(u)
+ (u u) = p + + SM
t
(1)
= u + u T u
3
(2)
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
813
(H tot ) p
+ (uH tot )
t
t
= (kT) + (u ) + u SM + SE
2
= eff u (u + (u)T ) u(eff u + k), (8)
3
(3)
T = C
k2
,
eff = + T .
(9)
1
H tot = H + U 2
2
(4)
k
+ (uk) = + T k + p,
t
k
+ (u) = + T
t
+ C1 C2 ,
k
k
(6)
(7)
k2
.
( C2 C1 ) C
(10)
Numerical Methods
The Courant number is of fundamental importance for transient flows. For a one-dimensional grid,
it is defined by:
Courant =
ut
x
(11)
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
814
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 1: Freezing tunnel numerical 3-D grid for (a) boxes; (b) buckets; and (c) drum configurations.
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
(a)
815
To obtain the temperature history, type-T (copperconstantan AWG-24) thermocouples and resistive
thermal devices (RTDs) were installed throughout
the experimental configuration at specific locations.
The locations were chosen among the samples to
register the transient behavior of the heat transfer
during the process in the most comprehensive manner
possible (Reno et al., 2011). The thermocouples and
RTDs were connected to a signal conditioning system
(b)
(c)
Figure 2: Configurations of the containers inside the freezing tunnel: (a) plastic boxes (PEAD); (b) buckets
(PEAD); and (c) metallic drums.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
816
To obtain the temperature history, type-T (copperconstantan AWG-24) thermocouples and resistive
thermal devices (RTDs) were installed throughout
the experimental configuration at specific locations.
The locations were chosen among the samples to
register the transient behavior of the heat transfer
during the process in the most comprehensive manner
possible (Reno et al., 2011). The thermocouples and
RTDs were connected to a signal conditioning system
(National Instruments - Model SCXI - Hungary). The
temperature measurements were obtained at 2-minute
intervals using the LabVIEW 8.5 software package.
The average temperature of the cooling air was
monitored using a parallel arrangement of type-T
thermocouples distributed evenly in front of the
evaporator. The registration of the temperatures was
performed using a data acquisition system.
Air Velocity Measurement
The air velocity was determined at various locations along the freezing tunnel using a hot-wire
anemometer (TSI - model 9535 - USA). These devices
were established at different heights (coordinate
Y(m) = 0.420; 0.845; 1.270; 1.695; and 2.120),
lengths (coordinate X(m) = 0.000; 0.090; 0.180;
0.270; 0.360; 0.450; 0.540; 0.630; 0.720; 0.810;
0.900; 0.990; 1.080; 1.170; 1.260; 1.350; 1.440;
1.530; 1.610; 1.700; 1.790; 1.880; 1.970; 2.060;
2.150; 2.240; and 2.330) and widths (coordinate
Z(m) = 0.135 and 1.195) in the freezing tunnel along
the horizontal and vertical directions of the air
circulation.
The vertical (uy) and horizontal (uz) velocities
were measured and the average air velocity was
determined using the equation:
uexp =
u 2y
+ u 2z
(12)
t f ,slab
E
(13)
E = 1 + W1 + W2
(14)
Bis 5 2
2
W1 =
3 +
Bis + 2 81 Bis + 2 1 (1 + 1)
(15)
and
Bis 5 2
2
W2 =
+
Bis + 2 82 Bis + 2 2 (2 + 1)
(16)
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
E AN
817
sin Z n
2
2
= 1 +
1 +
4 3 sin 2 Z Z
n
n sinh Z + cosh Z
Bis Bis
(
)
(
)
n =1 Z n 1 +
n
1
n
1
Bis Bis
822
sin Z
n sin Z m
n =1 m =1
Z n Z m Z2nm 1 +
Z nm 1
sinh ( Z nm )
cosh(Znm ) +
Bi
s 2
1
1
sin 2 Z m
sin 2 Z n 1 +
Bis
Bis1
(17)
Bis = Z n tanZ n
(18)
and
Bis 1 = Z m tanZ m
Properties
Tf (oC)
o (kg m-3)
f (kg m-3)
ko(W m-1 C-1)
kf (W m-1 C-1)
cpo (J kg-1 C-1 )
cpf (J kg-1 C-1)
.eff (kJ kg-1 )
(19)
(20)
Values
-2.0963
1057.6292
997.0756
0.5474
1.7896
3.7650
2.3090
271.3500
A comparison of the difference between the predicted and experimental values was made according
to the following equation:
E AS =
2
1
1 + + 1 +
Bi
1
2
+ 3 + 181 + 412
Bi +
61 2 +
1
(21)
%e =
predito experimental
100.
experimental
(22)
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
818
(a1)
(a2)
(b1)
(b2)
(c1)
(c2)
Figure 3: Air velocity (m s-1) profiles measured (1) and airflow pathways and air
velocity profiles calculated using CFD (2) for the investigated configurations: (a)
stacked boxes; (b) stacked buckets; and (c) linear metallic drums.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
819
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4: Simulated and experimental results for the air velocity at the coordinates Y=1.27 m and
Z=0.135 m of the freezing tunnel for configurations with (a) boxes; (b) buckets; and (c) metallic
drums.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
820
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 6: Maps of convective heat transfer coefficients on the containers surfaces simulated using CFD
for (a) boxes; (b) buckets; and (c) metallic drums.
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
821
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
822
Table 2: Comparison between the freezing-time estimates using simulated average values of h and
experimental values for guava fruit pulp in large containers.
Y(m)
0.1629
0.6729
0.8429
1.3529
Y (m)
0.25
0.62
0.99
1.36
X (m)
0.44
1.16
1.88
hsim
(W m-2 C-1)
8.39
6.74
7.15
8.46
hsim
(W m-2 C-1)
5.9
6.82
7.28
8.46
hsim
(W m-2 C-1)
13.460
13.040
13.040
Boxes
t2 (h)
t1 (h)
(Eqs. (13) and (14)) (Eqs. (13) and (17))
35.199
37.413
42.811
45.505
40.591
43.145
34.941
37.140
Buckets
t1 (h)
(Eqs. (13) and (21))
45.968
43.924
43.005
40.899
Metallic drums
t1 (h)
(Eqs. (13) and (21))
105.077
106.823
106.823
texpSD
(h)
41.842.27
46.586.64
46.501.32
41.102.94
texp (h)
49.542.20
50.753.46
50.432.87
48.291.95
texp (h)
102.905.98
100.325.79
96.026.27
Error t1
(%)
-15.71
-6.76
-11.79
-14.69
Error
t2 (%)
-10.41
-0.89
-6.24
-9.32
Error t1
(%)
-7.77
-20.84
-21.15
-26.23
Error t1
(%)
2.35
6.72
11.26
velocities were greatest. The validations of these results obtained from CFD were made to compare the
estimated values for freezing times with experimental measurements. The results indicated good correlations between the predicted and experimental
values when applied for the freezing-time estimates
for the box and drum configurations. The mean
errors were less than 15.8% using the EHTD method
and were less than 10.5% using a semi-analytical
method applied to compact rectangular bricks in the
box configuration. For the bucket configuration, the
mean errors were obtained and were compared to the
predicted values using the simulated average h values;
the errors of the experimental values were approximately 26.5% and were underestimated. In this case,
the poor results were attributed to the use of a 3-D
grid that was built without consideration of each
bucket as an individual object. For the drums, the use
of simulated h values obtained from CFD produced
mean errors of 3.3% for the drum located near the
door, 6.7% for the central position, and 11.3% for the
drum positioned in the bottom of the tunnel.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Heat Transfer Analyses Using Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Air Blast Freezing of Guava Pulp in Large Containers
T
T
NOMENCLATURE
Bi
Bis
Cp
C1
C2
C
E
g
h
H
k
p
SE
SM
t
texp
tf
tf,slab
u
U
V
X
W1,2
Y
Z
Zn, Zm
Znm
J kg-1 K-1
,eff
, ,
eff
ratio of dimension to
characteristic dimension
identity tensor
dissipation rate of turbulent
kinetic energy
turbulent kinetic energy
production term by the shear
effect (Eq. (8))
effective latent heat
density
constants of k- model
viscosity
effective viscosity
kg m-1s-1
K
kg m-1 s-1
Superscripts
transposition
Subscripts
m s-2
W m-2 K-1
kJ kg-1
W m-1 K-1
kPa
kg m-1 s-3
kg m-2 s-2
s, min, h
h
h
h
m s-1
m3 s-1
m3
m
m
m
Greek Letters
turbulent viscosity
temperature difference
shear stress
823
i = 1, 2
kg ms-2
m2s-2
m2s-2
kg m-1s-2
kJ kg-1
kg m-3
kg m-1s-1
kg m-1s-1
air
AN
AS
eq
exp
f
pred
sim
slab
tot
0
air
analytically derived
asymptotically derived
equivalent
experimental
frozen
predicted
simulated
slab
total
unfrozen
REFERENCES
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 30, No. 04, pp. 811 - 824, October - December, 2013
824