Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 20 November 2014
Received in revised form
22 April 2015
Accepted 23 April 2015
Available online 16 May 2015
Keywords:
Transformation
mer operon
Inorganic mercury
Biosorption
Volatilization
Introduction
Mercury is one of the most toxic metals among the pollutants
and there are many reports of using marine bacteria for bioremediation of mercury (De et al., 2006). The reported microorganisms
have been found to remove mercury either via mer operon mediated mercury resistance pathways (Dash and Das, 2012) or extracellular absorption of mercury (Francois et al., 2012). The mer
operon mediated mercury resistance results in the conversion of
cationic mercury (Hg2) to volatile, relatively less toxic Hg0. The
mer operon has been found to be present either in plasmid or
genomic DNA or located within transposons (Barkay et al., 2003).
Though the research on mercury and mercury resistant bacteria
has been conducted for many decades, the quest for the most
suitable mechanisms of mercury bioremediation is still going on
(Dash and Das, 2012). Much progress has been achieved for
bioremediation of mercury by marine bacteria (De et al., 2006;
bler, 2013). However, complete
Zhang et al., 2012; Wagner-Do
removal of mercury from the contaminated environments is still a
challenge in microbial treatment systems.
180
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
181
182
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
Fig. 1. Growth and survival pattern of the transgenic strain B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05) on SWN broth (peptone e 5 g, yeast extract e 3.0 g, aged sea water e 500 ml, deionized water
e 500 ml) (a) at different mercury concentrations (5, 10, 15, 30 and 50 ppm); (b) at different pH conditions (pH 5, 6, 7 and 8); (c) Under salinity stress conditions (5, 10, 15 and
30 ppt); (d) Comparison of survival in presence and absence of mercury (10 ppm).
Table 1
Modication of functional groups in presence of Hg2 supplementation in transgenic B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05).
Groups
Bonded eOH
SeH stretch
Amide C]O stretch
Nitrile CeN stretch
Phosphate P]O stretch
Alkyl halide
B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05)
W/o Hg2
With Hg2
3432.41
2449.50
1721.56
1275.84
1057.85
976.10
3413.92
2367.75
1676.79
1258.32
1039.35
976.10
mercury volatilizing strain B. thuringiensis PW-05 (Fig. 2). This performance is superior to that reported previously for organisms
engineered for mercury remediation, where either biosorption
(Chen and Wilson, 1997; Bae et al., 2001; Ruiz et al., 2011) or volatilization activities (Kiyono and Pan-Hou, 2006; Haque et al., 2010)
Fig. 2. In-vitro mercury removal potential of the test organisms B. thuringiensis PW-05,
B. cereus BW-03, transgenic B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05) and encapsulated B. cereus BW03(pPW-05) with various concentrations of mercury as HgCl2. The absorption capacity
of the alginate beads was 0.8%.
Fig. 3. Effect of salinity on the expression of merA. The mRNA level of merA was
normalized to that of 16S rRNA.
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
183
184
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
Fig. 5. Pathogenicity test of the transformant B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05) revealed by phenotypic analysis, (a) Motility test on soft agar tubes, (b) Biolm formation assay and (c)
Cytotoxicity assay. 1: Transformant B. cereus BW-03(pPW-05), 2: pathogenic E. coli strain, 3: negative control.
Barkay, T., Miller, S.M., Summers, A.O., 2003. Bacterial mercury resistance from
atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 355e384.
Bauer, A., Kirby, W., Sherris, J., Turck, M., 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a
standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Path. 45, 493e496.
Brierley, C.L., Brierley, J.A., Davidson, M.S., 1989. Applied microbial processes for
metals recovery and removal from wastewater. In: Beveridge, T.J., Doyle, R.J.
(Eds.), Metal Ions and Bacteria. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 359e382.
Chakraborty, J., Das, S., 2014. Characterization and cadmium resistant gene
expression of biolm forming marine bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa JP-11.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 14188e14201.
Chen, S., Wilson, D.B., 1997. Genetic engineering of bacteria and their potential for
Hg2 bioremediation. Biodegradation 8, 97e103.
Chung, C.T., Niemela, S.L., Miller, R.H., 1989. One-step preparation of competent
Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 2172e2175.
Cutting, S.M., 2011. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 28, 214e220.
Dash, H.R., Das, S., 2012. Bioremediation of mercury and importance of bacterial mer
genes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 75, 207e213.
Dash, H.R., Mangwani, N., Chakrabarty, J., Kumari, S., Das, S., 2013. Marine bacteria:
potential candidates for enhanced bioremediation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
97, 561e571.
Dash, H.R., Mangwani, N., Das, S., 2014. Characterization and potential application in
mercury bioremediation of highly mercury-resistant marine bacterium Bacillus
thuringiensis PW-05. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 2642e2653.
De, J., Sarkar, A., Ramaiah, N., 2006. Bioremediation of toxic substances by mercury
resistant marine bacteria. Ecotoxicology 15, 385e389.
De, J., Ramaiah, N., Vardanyan, L., 2008. Detoxication of toxic heavy metals by
marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Mar. Biotechnol. 10, 471e477.
De, J., Dash, H.R., Das, S., 2014. Mercury pollution and bioremediation e a case study
on biosorption by a mercury resistant marine bacterium. In: Das, S. (Ed.), Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation. Elsevier, USA, pp. 137e166. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800021-2.00001-7.
Deng, X., Wang, P., 2012. Isolation of marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury
and their bioaccumulation process. Bioresour. Technol. 121, 342e347.
H.R. Dash, S. Das / International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 103 (2015) 179e185
Fleming, E.J., Mack, E.E., Green, P.G., Nelson, D.C., 2006. Mercury methylation from
unexpected Sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an ironreducing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 457e464.
Francois, F., Lombard, C., Guigner, J.M., Soreau, P., Brian-Jaisson, F., Martino, G.,
Vandervennet, M., Garcia, D., Molinier, A.L., Pignol, D., Peduzzi, J., Zirah, S.,
Rebuffat, S., 2012. Isolation and characterization of environmental bacteria
capable of extracellular biosorption of mercury. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78,
1097e1106.
Garca, J.L., Asadinezhad, A., Pachernk, J., Lehock, M., Junkar, I., Humpol
cek, P.,
S
aha, P., Val
asek, P., 2010. Cell proliferation of HaCaT keratinocytes on
collagen lms modied by argon plasma treatment. Molecules 15,
2845e2856.
Haque, S., Zeyaullah, M., Nabi, G., Srivastava, P.S., Ali, A., 2010. Transgenic tobacco
plant expressing environmental E. coli merA gene for enhanced volatilization of
ionic mercury. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20, 917e924.
hanno, I., Re
jasse, A., Kallassy, M., Lereclus, D., Sanchis, V.,
Kamar, R., Gohar, M., Je
Ramarao, N., 2013. Pathogenic potential of Bacillus cereus strains as revealed by
phenotypic analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 320e323.
Kerin, E.J., Gilmour, C.C., Roden, E., Suzuki, M.T., Coates, J.D., Mason, R.P., 2006.
Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 72, 7919e7921.
Kiyono, M., Pan-Hou, H., 2006. Genetic engineering of bacteria for environmental
remediation of mercury. J. Health Sci. 52, 199e204.
pez-Alonso, V., 2012.
Lopez-Campos, G., Martnez-Su
arez, J.V., Aguado-Urda, M., Lo
pezDetection, identication and analysis of foodborne pathogens. In: Lo
rez, J.V., Aguado-Urda, M., Lo
pez-Alonso, V. (Eds.),
Campos, G., Martnez-Sua
Microarray Detection and Characterization of Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens,
Springer, USA Briefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition, pp. 13e32. http://dx.doi.org/
185