Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contents
1. Initial data
2. Tangential stress
3. Rotor size
4. Air gap and the core length
5. Stator winding
6. Air-gap flux density and linear current density
7. Number of coil turns in a phase winding
8. Number of conductors in a slot
9. Determination of new air gap flux density
10. Width of the stator tooth
11. Stator slot dimensions
12. Magnetic voltage over the tooth
13. Checking the saturation factor
14. Magnetic circuit
15. Outer stator diameter and inner rotor diameter
16. Total magnetic voltage of the magnetic circuit with rotor magnetization
17. Stator resistance
18. Magnetizing inductance
19. Air-gap leakage inductance and reactance
20. Slot leakage inductance and reactance
21. Tooth tip leakage inductance and reactance
22. End winding leakage inductance and reactance
23. Synchronous inductance and reactance
24. Losses (except stator resistive losses)
25. Rated load, stator current, stator resistive losses and total losses
26. Efficiency and power factor
27. Masses of the active materials
28. Load angle equation graph
1. Initial data
Output power, W
160000
41.667
Torque T = P/(2n), Nm
690
Number of phases
Frequency, Hz
f n p
2 f
Desired efficiency
0.95
Power factor
n 60
2 n
cos
611.1501
166.6680
0.91
Hc
800000
Br
1.05
4 10
rec
Cu20C
Cu
3.81 10
k Fe
0.97
Fe
7600
PM
2.5000 10
Br
rec
0 Hc
80
Cu
57 10
7500
8960
1.0445
We introduce the BH curve of the M800-50A lamination material. The specific loss
of this material at 1.5 T and 50 Hz is
P15 6.6 W /kg
0
84.5
107
121
133
145
156
168
180
194
209
H
228
254
304
402
660
1480
3710
7300
15000
30000
100000
BH curve of M800-50
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
B
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
0
0
2 10
410
6 10
H
A/m
810
1 10
We also introduce the graph for the yoke magnetic voltage calculation
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
By
c
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.71
0.70
0.67
0.63
0.57
0.48
0.40
0.33
0.26
0.20
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.4
0.2
0
0.5
1.5
By
2. Tangential stress
The determination of the main dimensions starts with choosing the appropriate
tangential stress for open-circuit cooling according to the machine type (Table 6.3).
Ftan
33500 cos
Ftan
3. Rotor size
The rotor volume Vr can be solved from Eq. (6.2)
Dr2
T F tan
l ' 2 F tanVr ,
2
3.0485 10
Pa
where Dr is the outer rotor diameter and l' the equivalent length of the rotor.
The volume Vr is
Vr
Vr
2 Ftan
m3
0.0100
The ratio of equivalent core length and air-gap diameter is according to Table 6.5:
l'
4p
Dr
4 p
0.3927
From the equations above we can solve the rotor diameter (including surface magnets)
and the equivalent iron core length:
3
Dr
4 Vr
Dr
0.3191 m
0.1257
Air-gap length (from the surface of the permanent magnet to the stator inner surface) is
calculated from Eq. (6.42):
0.18 0.006 P0.4
1000
9.0410 10
Surface magnets need a supporting band, the thickness of which is about 1 mm,
and thus the physical air-gap length is increased to
0.0016
10
1.6000
mm Use = 4 [mm]
Ds
0.3232
Ds 10
323.2000
mm
b s
0.12
nvs
b vs
nr
b r
nvr
b vr
No cooling channels!
bve
B
bv
l
rotor
Fig. 3.1 Influence of radial ventilating ducts on the equivalent length of the machine and the
behaviour of the flux density in the vicinity of the ventilating duct.
By applying Eqs. (3.7a) and (3.7b) and by substituting the width of the slot opening b with
the width of the ventilating duct bv we obtain
bve k bv
The coefficient k can be determined as
bvs bvr
b vs b vr
0.0000
b ve
0.0000
0.1200
0.1232
5. Stator winding
Use q = 1
W Wp p
5
6
2 p m q
48.0000
Ds
Q
0.0212
Ds
2 p
0.1269
As the magnets are rectangular, also the waveform of the flux density is approximately
rectangular. About 5-8 % of the flux that the rotor surface permanent magnets create is lost
as leakage flux, so the real magnets have to be 5-8 % wider than they are in our calculations
Let us choose for the effective relative magnet width
PM
0.80
The air gap flux density distribution produced only by permanent magnets is
hPM_i
i
10.066 10
0 100
x i i
1
200
1 2 k
8Br
x
p
sin 1 2 k e
cos 1 2 k
300
p
1 2 k PM
2
BPM ( x )
2 12 k 2 12 k hPM_i
k 0 2 1 2 k
p
p
1.05e
1 e
1
p
1
e
2 12 k hPM_i
p
1
e
BPMmax
0.8998
p
2
n x
n
B1( x )
BPM ( x ) dx
p BPM ( x ) cos p dx cos p x
p
n 1
0
B1peak
1.0855
According to Table 6.2, the linear current density RMS value for an air-cooled
nonsalient pole PMSM is 35-80kA/m
Tangential loading assuming sinusoidal flux density waveform to estimate the
mechanical torque is
F tan
A B cos AB cos
2
2
Ftan
4.3647 10
A/m
The number of coil turns in series in a phase winding can be calculated according
to Eq. (7.7)
2 E PM
k
w1
where EPM is the permanent-magnet-induced voltage. The value of EPM has a significant
influence on the machine performance. Depending on the desired machine performance,
EPM may vary from slightly under the supply voltage to slightly over the supply voltage. If
the motor performance after the design is not desired the designer may consider changing
EPM. Now EPM is assumed to be
EPM
1.0U
EPM
398.3717
ksq
s
sin sq
2
p
ssq
p 2
The skewing is carried out in the rotor so that it corresponds to one stator slot
pitch (Fig. 4.16)
ssq
ssq
p 2
ssq
p 2
sin
Ds
k sq( )
k sq
1 0.9886
The winding factor is a product of the skew, pitch and skew factors
ssq
2 sin Wp sin
sin
2
m 2 p 2
k w( )
Q
p
ssq
sin
m p
Q
p 2
2 EPM
N
kw
kw
1 922.3912 10 3
53.9789
B1peak p l
2 a m
N
Q
zQ
6.7474
Use a = 1
2
2 a m
N
Q
zQ
13.4947
zQold zQ
we select zQ 14
zQnew zQ
Q zQ
2 a m
56.0000
9. New Bmax
The rounding of zQ influences the peak value of the flux-density-induced voltage EPM and
the power factor. To keep the induced voltage EPM unchanged, we will use a new air-gap
flux density in the following calculations
BPMold ( x ) BPM ( x )
(Appropriate values are used in the following equation to get new Bmax)
BPM ( x )
zQold
z
BPMold ( x )
Qnew
p
n x
2
n x
BPM ( x ) cos
B1( x )
BPM ( x ) dx
d
x
cos
p
p
p
p
0
n1
0
B1peak
Bmax
1.0463
0.8673
T
T
According to Table 6.1, the flux density of a stator tooth for nonsalient-pole synchronous
machines varies normally from 1.5 T to 2.0 T. Let us choose for the apparent density
Bdapp
1.6
Bd'
l ' u
B
kFe l nvbv bd
b dmin
l u
Bmax
b dmin
k Fe l nvs b vs Bdapp
0.0121
To determine the stator slot dimensions, we have first to estimate the stator current.
According to Eq.(7.9a) the stator current of the motor is
Is
P
mU s,ph cos
Is2
m Usph cos
P
m Usph cos
Depending on the machine type (motor or generator) the user have to choose
the corresponding subcript:
1 - for the motor
2 - for the generator
Is Is2
Is
147.1190
Is
aJ s
J s
Scs
4.5 10 A /m2
Is
Scs
a Js
1.6347 10
m2
Scs 1000000
16.3466 mm2
S Cus
k Cus
where kCu,s is the space factor of the slot. The space factor inside the slot
insulation is about
k Cus
0.63
With this value of the space factor, the wound area of the slot
SCus
zQ Scs
SCus
k Cus
3.6326 10
m2
SCus 1000000
363.2569 mm2
bw
aCus
hw
bCus
h'
mm
5 10
b is
5 10
mm
bw bs 4...6
mm
hs
bis
bs
The width of the rectangular slot
b s u b dmin
bs
9.0164 10
b s 10
a Cus 10
9.0164
mm
a Cus
8.0164 10
8.0164
mm
b Cus
SCus
b Cus
2a Cus
b Cus 10
hs 10
2.7049 10
hw 10
0.0130
b w 10
hd 10
0.0227
22.6570
mm
hs
0.0468
46.8141
mm
2.7049
mm
13.0164
mm
49.5190
mm
0.3 b s
hw
b w b s 4 10
bw
hd
0.0495
Sslot
4.2210 10
m2
Sslot 10
422.0956
mm2
The flux density in the tooth is obtained by solving the intersection of the BH curve of the
electric sheet in question and the line given by Eq. (3.46)
S
Bd Bd' u 0 H d
Sd
where
B
B d'
Su
l ' u
1
S d k Fe l n v bv bd
B d
S
B d B d' u 0 H d
Sd
H d
The tooth width along the height is nonuniform.To simplify the problem we will calculate th
magnetic voltage in 4 different parts of the tooth and then we will sum up them.
hd
4
hr hd
2
3hd
b d
Ds 2hr
Q
0.0121
0.0138
bd
0.0154
0.0170
bs
Bdapp
l u B1peak
k Fe l nvs b vs b d
1.9301
1.7027
Bdapp
1.5233
1.3781
Using the BH curve of M800-50A, we get for the field strengths in the teeth
vs lspline( H B)
Initial guess
Bed Bdapp
A/m
Given
Bdapp
l u
Bd Find Bed
1.9095
1.6821
Bd
1.5027
1.3575
Hd interp vs B H Bd
1.6424 104
Hd 3.3119 10
682.2864
360.3483
A/m
hd
U m,d H d dl
ld
Umds ld Hd
Umds
hd hd hd hd
4 4 4 4
A
257.2337
In the case of a surface permanent magnet machine, the saturation of the teeth does not
influence the waveform of the air-gap flux density, in other words, PM remains constant.
14. Magnetic circuit.
bs
r
b1
2.2541 10
b 1 10
2
2 b 1 2
b1
atan
ln 1
2( ) b1
2
2.2541
k C1
u b 1
1.0227
1.6364 10
0.2086
mm
Bmax
0
Ume
1.1294 10
The height of the stator yoke hys and the height of the rotor yoke hyr are solved
from Eqs. (3.48) and (3.49):
m
B ys m
2 S ys 2k Fe l nv b v hys
m
B yr m
2 S yr 2k Fe l nv bv hyr
where the air-gap flux is
m PM Bmax p l
0.0108 Vs
The maximum flux densities of the stator and rotor yokes are selected according to Table 6.1
Bys
hys
hyr
1.3
Byr
1.3
hys
0.0359
hyr
0.0359
In our example, the rotor carries thin laminations of height hyr. Permanent magnets are also
often placed on solid steel. Such an arrangement may, however, create extra losses under the
permanent magnets.
The magnetic voltages are according to Eqs. (3.51) and (3.52)
U m,ys cs H ys ys
U m,yr cr H yr yr
The coefficient c can be taken from Fig. (3.17) below
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Byr, Bys /T
2.0
From the BH curve of M800-50A, we get for the maximum field strengths in the stator
and rotor yokes
vs lspline( B H )
Hymaxs
304.0000
A /m
Hymaxr
304.0000
A /m
Bys
1.3000
Byr
1.3000
cs
0.3300
cr
0.3300
cr interp vs By c Byr
The average stator yoke diameter (see Figs. 3.1 and 3.2) is
Dys Ds
ys
2 hs hw hys
Dys
2p
ys
0.1799
Dys
0.4581
Umys
18.0467
U
U
U mtot U m U mds U mPM mys myr H c hPM
2
2
The permanent magnet flux density BPM is equal to the air-gap flux density
BPM Bmax
The magnetic voltage over the rotor yoke is according to the textbook
U myr cr H yr yr
yr
U myr
Dyr
Dr 2hPM hyr
2p
2p
cr H yr Dr hyr cr H yr hPM
2p
p
U mtot H c hPM
H
U mys
cr H yr Dr hyr
cr H yr hPM
Br
2
4p
2p
hPM
0.0101
Umys
Hc
Br
4p
BPM
cr Hymaxr Dr hyr
cr Hymaxr
2p
1000 hPM 10.0665 mm
For more accuracy of the flux density calculation the PM height is substituted as a new valu
of iteration in Item 6.
The magnetic voltage of the permanent magnet
UmPM
Hc
Br
BPM hPM
UmPM
6.6523 10 A
Dyr
0.2640
yr
Dyr
yr
2p
0.1037
Umyr
10.4011
0.4939
Dri
0.2282
8.0532 10
Umys
Umyr
All the dimensions of the motor have now been defined. Next, the resistances, inductances,
losses and other characteristics of the permanet magnet machine are calculated.
17. Stator resistance
2l 2.4Wp p 0.1
lav
0.5938 m
where l is the length of the stator stack ( the real length) - p.256
The conductivity of copper wire in 100 degrees C (the temperature rise = 80 K) is
Cu
Cu20C
1 Cu
Cu
4.3685 10
S/m
N lav
Cu a Scs
0.0233
Umys
Umyr
Ume
ef
0.0117
The calculation of magnetizing inductance in d-direction of the two-axis model, Eq. (3.110)
Lmd
m 2
1 4 p
2
0 l
k w 1 N
2
2 p ef
Lmd
6.8291 10
Lmq
6.8291 10
k
w
k w1
1
kp sin
2
p
p 2
Q
k d
0.5236
sinq u / 2
qsin u / 2
Eq. (2.2)
sin 1 2 k m q
sin 1 2 k m Wp 2
q sin 1 2 k m u
300
2
k 1
1 2 k m kw1
k 1
sin 1 2 k m q
sin 1 2 k m Wp 2
q sin 1 2 k m u
300
2
k 12
1 2 k m kw1
k 1
k 1
0.0105
k 12
0.0135
0.0240
1.6384 10
0.0172
1 Wp
16
3
k 2 1
4
k 1
u k 1
Lu
4m
Xu
0.1667
Eq. (4.51)
k1
0.9063
Eq. (4.53)
k2
0.8750
2b is h
3 bs
2
0 l N u
2 f Lu
bis
k 2
bs
hw
bw b1
bw h
b 1 4 bs
ln
Lu
2.3865 10
Xu
0.2499
Eq. (4.30)
1.9662
Eq. (4.49)
5
d k 2
b1
5 4
Ld
Xd
4m
Q
Eq. (4.62)
0.3961
b1
0 l d N
2 f Ld
Ld
4.8082 10
Xd
0.0504
zQ
zQ
q2
leW
WeW
lew
0.025 m
W ew lw 2lew
lw
W ew
lav
0.1269
lw
0.1769
l is the length of the machine stack which includes the cooling ducts.
The permeance factors are selected according to Table 4.2. (When we select the end windin
permeance factor, a permanent magnet machine may be regarded as a salient-pole machine.)
lew
W
0.518
0.138
lw
0.2454
Lw
Xw
q N 0 lw w
2 f Lw
Lw
8.5545 10
Xw
0.0896
Ls
3.8866 10
Xs
0.4070
2 f Ls
Ld
1.0716 10
Xd
1.1222
2 f Ld
Lq Ld
Lq
1.0716 10
Xq Xd
Xq
1.1222
To calculate the core losses, we need the masses of different iron parts.
Bys
f
1.3000
166.6680
Vs/m2
Hz
Dse Ds
l nvs bvs
Vs
0.0131
m3
Dse 2
Vys
2
Dse
hys
l nvs b vs
Vys
6.1913 10
m3
mys
45.6419
kg
Vslots
2.4313 10
m3
bs bw hw
2
l nvs b vs
Vwedges
1.7164 10
m3
Vds
4.3551 10
m3
mds
32.1057
kg
Ds 2hd
b s min b d ld
Q
l n b
md k Fe Fe Q
vs vs
2
Correction coefficients for the core loss calculations, Table 3.2
k Fed
k Fey
1.5
The core loss in the stator yoke is according to Eqs. (3.69 and 3.77)
3
2
2
Bys
f
mys
1.5
50
PFeys
2.0655 10 W
The core loss of the tooth area is calculated using the mass md defined above
Bd
1.5
50
3
2
PFeds
3.0527 10 W
PFe
5.1182 10
Mechanical losses consisting of windage and ventilator losses are calculated from
an experimental equation (Eq. (9.19) and Table 9.2)
P k Dr (l 0.6 p ) r2
vr n Dr
k
m/s
41.8882
vr
Ws2/m4
10
P k Dr l
0.6 p vr2
1.1014 10
The stator slot openings cause permeance harmonic losses in the rotor surface permanent
magnets.
The slot openings b1 cause a frequency fPM on the rotor surface
fPM n Q
fPM
2.0000 10
Hz
hPM
2rec
b e b 1
be
4.7022 10
6.4190 10
m
See Item 14
k CPM
PMEC
u be
k CPM
1.0227
b1
b1
2 PMEC
2 PMEC
1 u2 2u
2 1 u2
Eq. (3.10)
1.1909
7.5334 10
B0 Bmax
B0
6.5340 10
fPM 2 rec 0
fPM 2
1
a R
S /m
74.3325
300.0000
4
4
k k
2
a R
2
u B0 k
aR
PPMEC
1 Dr PM l
2l 0 rec PM
2
PPMEC
670000
PM
Dr n
PM
4.0435
2 k
71.6798
The calculation assumed bulky magnets of one piece each. The losses are large and
therefore the magnets should maybe be made of pieces to minimize the losses.
There are also some additional losses in the machine.
Let us assume that they are 0.5 % of the output power
Pex
0.005 P
Pex
800.0000
25. Rated load, stator current, stator resistive losses and total losses
The stator current should be known in the loss calculation. The final value of the current
must be iterated.
The old stator current
Is
147.1190
144
3 Is2 R
PCu
1.4485 10
Ploss
8.5397 10 W
Input power
Pin P Ploss
Pin
1.6854 10
U E
2 Ld Lq
Pin 3 sph PM sin U sph
sin 2
L
2s Ld Lq
s d
Initial guess for the new load angle is the previous load angle
loadin
Given
Usph EPM
Pin = 3
Xd
2 Xd Xq
2 Xd Xq
sin
loadin
loadinN
0.4085rad
deltaN
23.4060
deltaN loadinN
180
degrees
EPM Xq
Id 32.1248
EPM R
Iq
140.3573 A
Is
144.0000
Is
Id Iq
Is
143.9867
If Is differs more than 1 % from the estimated value, give the stator current a new
value and repeat the calculations of Item 25.
26. Efficiency and power factor
P
Pin
100
94.9331
Pin
cos
3 U Is
0.9794
The masses of the stator yoke mys and the teeth mds have been calculated above.
The rotor core outer diameter
Dryi Dr 2 hPM
Dryi
0.2999 m
Dryi Dr
PM l nvr b vr hPM PM
mPM
7.0571
kg
mCu
46.6376
kg
mCu Cu l 2 lw Q zQ Scs
myr k Fe
Dryi Dri
2
l Fe
myr
26.3054
kg
mtot
157.7478
kg
Depending on the machine type (motor or generator) the user have to choose
the corresponding load angle equation graph:
Pout
1.6000 10
0 100
load i
100
2
EPM Usph
Usph 1
1
P load m
sin load
sin
2
load
2 Xq Xd
Xd
4.2427 10
max P load
max P load
Pout
2.6517
Maximum power
Load characteristic
Power (W)
P load
4.510
5
4.12510
5
3.7510
5
3.37510
5
310
5
2.62510
5
2.2510
5
1.87510
5
1.510
5
1.12510
4
7.510
4
3.7510
0
0.314 0.628 0.942 1.257 1.571 1.885 2.199 2.513 2.827 3.142
load
Load angle (rad)
Pout
Tsh
2 n
611.1501
Nm
0 100
load i
i
100
3 p
T load
2 f
2
EPM Usph
Usph 1
1
sin load
sin
2
load
2 Xq Xd
Xd
1.6206 10
max T load
max T load
Tsh
2.6517
Nm
Maximum torque
Load characteristic
Torque (Nm)
T load
1.810
3
1.6510
3
1.510
3
1.3510
3
1.210
3
1.0510
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
0.314 0.628 0.942 1.257 1.571 1.885 2.199 2.513 2.827 3.142
load
Load angle (rad)