Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL
ENGINEERING
EXPERIMENT NUMBER: 1
LAB GROUP NUMBER: A
GROUP MEMBERS:
DAURE
SAM T.
..
DZAPASI
RUTENDO A.
MAVHIYA
MUNYARADZI
.
KWENDA
MIEGUERY
.................
CHIRIPASHI
ELIJAH
.
MAROWATSANGA RUVARASHE
.
CHIPUNZA
TINOTENDA
.
CHIPANERA
MAKANAKA
.
MUSUNDIRE
TAKUNDA
IRADUKUNDA
CEDRIC
.
R158247X
R158275N
R158264T
R158262B
R138431X
R158255H
R158239B
R047483W
R115048L
R158279J
A-DIAL GUAGE
B-WEGHTS
C-STEEL RULE
D- HANGER
E- TABLE
5.PROCEDURE:
Keeping L and x constant, values of for several loads was
measured using the dial gauge placed vertically at mid span
of the beam and initially set to zero.
The apparatus base was tapped lightly before each gauge
reading was obtained to reduce friction effects in the gauge.
The same procedure was repeated for a variety of beams and
comparative graphs were plotted on the same axis.
6.RESULTS:
Material A: Mild steel
Width
Height
Overhang
Fixed Length
b/ m
d/ m
x/m
L/m
25.10 10^-3
3.9510^-3
0.10
1.00
MASS
LOAD
DEFLECTION
m / kg
0.2
W/N
1.962
1 /mm
1.89
2 / mm
1.96
AV / mm
1.93
0.4
3.924
3.77
3.90
3.84
0.6
5.886
5.76
0.8
7.848
7.66
1.0
9.810
8.54
5.83
7.83
8.54
5.80
7.75
8.54
AV / m
19.310
^-4
38.410
^-4
58.010
^-4
77.510
^-4
85.410
^-4
25.3 10^-3
5.410^-3
0.1
1.00
MASS
LOAD
DEFLECTION
m/kg
0.2
W/N
1.962
1 /mm
0.43
2 / mm
0.44
AV / mm
0.44
0.4
3.924
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.6
5.886
1.33
1.33
1.33
0.8
7.848
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.0
9.810
2.20
2.20
2.20
AV / m
44.010
^-5
87.010
^-5
13.310
^-4
17.510
^-4
22.010
^-4
25.9010^-3
7.3010^-3
0.10
1.00
MASS
LOAD
DEFLECTION
m / kg
0.2
W/N
1.962
1 /mm
0.24
2 / mm
0.25
AV / mm
0.25
0.4
3.924
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.6
5.886
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.8
7.848
0.98
0.99
0.99
1.0
9.810
1.24
1.24
1.24
AV / m
25.010
^-5
48.010
^-5
73.010
^-5
99.010
^-5
12.410
^-4
MATERIAL A
MATERIAL B
MATERIAL C
CALCULATIONS:
For Material A:
W=
2 Eb d
2
3L x
But gradient =
2 Eb d
2
3L x
(0.006;6.2)(0.00185;2).
(6.2-2)/0.006-0.00185) =
=1012.05Nm-1
Therefore E = gradient (3L2x)/2bd3
E = 9.811010 Nm-2
For Material B:
W=
2 Eb d
2
3L x
But gradient =
2 Eb d3
3 L2 x
(0.0022; 9.8)(0.00045;2)
For Material C:
W=
2 Eb d
2
3L x
But gradient =
2 Eb d
2
3L x
(0.0012;9.6)(0.00024;2).
(9.6-2)/(0.0012-0.00024)
=7 916.67Nm-1
Therefore E = gradient (3L2x)/2bd3
E = 1.181011 Nm-2
Parallax error
By being alert
CONCLUSION:
The graph is linear showing that the weight is directly proportional
to deflection. There is considerable deviation from the standard
values due to the errors in the experiment. Therefore modulus of
elasticity increases with increase in density.