Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ENDODONTOLOGY
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary system for guttapercha
removal during endodontic retreatment.
Methodology:30 extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared & filled with laterally condensed guttapercha & AH plus sealer. Teeth were divided into three groups: Group A: GP removal with Hedstrom files and
xylene,and further canal preparation with stainless steel K-flex files (Kerr). Group B: GP removal was completed
using Gates Glidden drills & Hedstrom files with xylene as a solvent, followed by further canal preparation with
ProTaper Universal rotary instruments: Group C: GP removal completed with the ProTaper Universal rotary
retreatment system & repreparation of the canal accomplished with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments: The
operating time was recorded. Teeth were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of the remaining GP/
sealer in bucco-lingual & mesio-distal directions. Statistical analysis was performed by using repeated measures
analysis of variance & ANOVA.
Results: The ProTaper Universal technique (Group c) resulted in a smaller percentage of canal area covered by
residual GP/sealer than in groups A& B.Conclusions:In this laboratory study all the techniques left GP/sealer
remnants within the root canal. The ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system proved to be an efficient
method of removing GP & sealer from root canals.
INTRODUCTION
D1,D2
&D3,
They
are
available
in
* Postgraduate student, ** Professor and Head of the Department, *** Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodotics, PMNM Dental College, Bagalkot,
Karnataka-587101
42
ENDODONTOLOGY
down
manner.Root
canal
refining
was
(Fig-5 &6)
Group C:
the study.
EVALUATION
Endodontic retreatment
groups
ENDODONTOLOGY
STEREOMICROSCOPIC PHOTOGRAPHS
(Fig12a,12b,13a,13b,14a,14b)
RESULTS: Table 1 & 2
ANOVA: Table3
F ratio=0.34/0.05 =6.8
F tab =5.49
By observing the actual data it is clear that
Group C is better than other two methods at
P<0.001.
MEAN RATIO OF SEALER OR GP TO AREA
OF CANAL: Graph 1
MEAN OPERATING TIME: Graph 2
ILLUSTRATIONS
44
ENDODONTOLOGY
ANOVA: Table3
DEGREE OF
FREEDOM
SUM OF
EQUATION
MEAN OF
SQUARES
BETWEEN THE
METHODS
3-2=1
0.68
0.34
METHODS OF
ERROR
29-2=27
1.36
0.05
GROUP B
GROUP C
SAMPLE 1
0.56
O.64
0.34
SAMPLE 2
0.42
0.59
0.47
SAMPLE 3
0.47
1.23
0.46
SAMPLE 4
0.52
1.02
0.23
SAMPLE 5
0.60
1.02
0.37
SAMPLE 6
0.53
0.70
0.20
SAMPLE 7
0.70
0.57
0.29
SAMPLE 8
0.60
0.65
0.43
SAMPLE 9
0.65
0.53
0.33
SAMPLE 10
0.60
0.67
0.29
TOTAL
5.65
7.27
3.57
DISCUSSION
A prerequisite for successful non surgical root
canal retreatment is the adequate balance between
10.23 min
GROUP B
10.25 min
GROUP C
10.20 min
ENDODONTOLOGY
canal system.
design which
CONCLUSION
were used.
REFERENCES
46
ENDODONTOLOGY
47