The Basics and Potential Power of an Affidavit of Truth

In the reality we live in, we would be wise to accept that we live in a world that has
laws, and these laws exist on paper and fortunately some laws exist in our hearts and
conscience. Since the dawn of laws-of-man there existed a piece of paper that was held
above all others; an Affidavit. A sworn statement of truth that if un-rebutted stands as
the agreement of the parties, the judgement in commerce and the truth in commerce.
So please humour me and answer the following (I have placed my answers in brackets):
Are you a man or woman? (Yes)
Are you an artificial entity of the UNITED KINGDOM aka CITIZEN, VESSEL, PERSON,
SUBJECT, TAXPAYER, LEGAL FICTION, RESIDENT or INDIVIDUAL? (No)
Do you belong to the UNITED KINGDOM? (No)
Should you be coerced into presenting yourself as a public entity? (No)
Are you capable of swearing an oath? (Yes)
Are you liable to or for any political/corporate rules (statutes)? (No)
As a man/woman do you have to voluntarily elect to submit to give another party
jurisdiction over you? (Yes)
Should your use of bank notes or any other public facility when alternatives are
generally unavailable tie you into a contract of some sort? (No)
Should you be coerced into receiving vaccinations or any other medical treatments and
procedures? (No)
Are your words your definitions and not for redefining? (Yes)
If you answered the above with the same answer as given then that is your truth, yes?
So imagine this as your sworn Affidavit being presented because as a man you are
receiving injury from another party, i.e. Corporations:
The Affiant is a private, living and sentient man.
The Affiant is not a UNITED KINGDOM citizen, subject, vessel or person or any
ens legis artificial entity, procedural phantom, legal fiction or juristic personality within
the UNITED KINGDOM.
Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED KINGDOM.
Any party that would order, represent or persuade the Affiant to falsely present the
Affiant as a UNITED KINGDOM citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device,
misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be
engaging in Enticement to Slavery.

Any party that alleges a liability against the Affiant is obligated to produce an Affidavit
of Liability to demonstrate such liability.
The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes,
including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any
of Respondents political subdivisions.
A legal fiction corporation cannot secure in personam jurisdiction over or against
Affiant, a living man, without Affiants voluntary election to submit.
The Affiants use of a notary public, Bank of England Promissory Notes, and/or any
other public facilities, when alternatives are generally unavailable, does not comprise
Affiants submission to any political jurisdiction, the creation of an adhesion contract
expressly or tacitly with the UNITED KINGDOM and/or any other party real or imagined,
or an appearance before any body or tribunal, administrative or judicial, real or
imagined.
It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the Affiants God given unalienable
rights if any government/corporative agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does infact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the Affiant into receiving any form of
medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations.
All words herein are as Affiant defines them.
So, as an operation of law, the Respondent, if they want to rebut, has to rebut your
Affidavit point-by-point via a sworn affidavit and providing evidence to support why
your statement is not true. Are they ever going to be able to do that? Of course they
are not; and they never can, because your affidavit offers facts and truth and all the
legal world can ever offer is fraud and falsehoods. So what have you got then? You have
got a lawfully binding agreement of the highest order that no other party can impair.
Not bad hey.
So imagine having a lawfully binding agreement with the CEO of the UK Government
(Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister), and/or the CEO of EUROPE (Herman Van Rompuy,
d/b/a President of EUROPE) that cannot be impaired by any party.
As a footnote and for those folk who like to fool around in the fictional and laughable
Admiralty courts of the UK and Europe; are you aware that a counterclaim is
mandatory? Did you know that the only true counterclaim is a lien? Did you know that
the highest form of lien is a Maritime lien from the private side (man/woman)? Did you
know that a Maritime lien is also known as a Commercial lien and a Commercial lien is
also known as, wait for it, Affidavit of Obligation? Did you know that if any public
entity attempts to impair/breach your agreements/contracts, you have an instant lien
right on the other party? Did you know that Affidavits of Obligations have had judges
running out the back door of the courts to avoid being named on the lien? This is
hardly going to make it to mainstream media is it!
Folks, Affidavits work because in law, they override everything else that comes before
them. Affidavits offer the Facts, Harmony and maybe more importantly when it comes

to law, the Agreement of the parties. Whilst of course the legal world offers only lies
and falsehoods.
Warmest regards,
Matt.