Chestfield Drainage Impact Assessment

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited
Version 4.1
DRAINAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

for
Proposed Residential Development

Chestfield Farm
The Drove
Chestfield, CT5 3NX
on behalf of
Hollamby Estates (2005) Ltd
Version 4.1
Document Control Sheet
Project Title
Proposed Residential Development

Chestfield Farm, Chestfield
Document Title
Drainage Impact Assessment
Job No.
12206
Revision
4.0
Status
Final
Status
Author
Date
1.0
Draft
P. Lavender
04.03.08
2.0
Final
P. Lavender
3.0
Reissued
4.0
4.1
Issue
Check
Date
Authorised
Date
04.03.08
A. Keeler
04.03.08 A. Keeler
04.03.08
P.Lavender
04.12.09
A.Keeler
04.12.09 A.Keeler
04.12.09
Reissued
P.Lavender
26.07.10
CDP (via
email)
28.07.10
Final
P.Lavender
28.07.10
CDP (via
email)
28.07.10 P. Lavender
28.07.10
Distribution List
Version
Issued to
Purpose
Date
1.0
Internal Check
1st Draft
2.0
Andy Tull CDP Architecture
Final for Planning
04.03.08
3.0
Andy Tull CDP Architecture
Updated
04.12.09
04.03.08
st
4.0
Mike Wicks CDP Architecture
New Scheme 1 Draft 26.07.10
4.1
Mike Wicks CDP Architecture
Final (pdf issue)
Job No. 12206

2010
28.07.10
July
Version 4.1
A Report on a Drainage Impact Assessment for the proposed Residential Development

at Chestfield Farm, Chestfield, by BSF Consulting Engineers Limited
CONTENTS
1.0
Status. 3
2.0
Synopsis 3
3.0
Introduction....4
4.0
Existing Site.. 5
5.0
Foul Water Drainage...

6
Existing discharge
6
Proposed discharged.. 8
Consents9
6.0
Surface Water Drainage. 10

Existing discharge
10
Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems. 11
Surface Water Strategy.. 12
Consents13
7.0
Flood Risk. 14
Flood Risk Assessment Pro Forma.. 15
8.0
Conclusions.. 18
Appendix A
BSF Drawings
12206/A3/100 Site Location Plan
12206/A3/101 Existing Site Drainage
12206/A3/102 Schematic Drainage Proposals
Architects Drawings
Impermeable Area Plan SDS 201202.01
Appendix B
Job No. 12206
2010
Windes Calculations
2
July
Version 4.1
Greenfield Run-off Rate

Outline Surface Water Network Design
Job No. 12206

2010
July
Version 4.1
1.0
STATUS
1.1
This Report is prepared for the sole use of Hollamby Estates (2005) Ltd and
their agents in connection with the proposed forthcoming planning application.
No responsibility can be assumed for the Report if used by others.
1.2
For the purposes of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, nothing in
this Report shall confer on any third party any right to enforce or benefit from
any term of this Report
2.0
SYNOPSIS
2.1
This Report is in accordance with the requirements of the Canterbury City

Council Drainage Impact Assessment for Development Proposals Guidance
Notes dated March 2003 and with Planning Policy Statement 25, Development
and Flood Risk.
2.2
The Report details the observations, calculates the probable flows that may be
generated by the development and makes recommendations for the disposal of
the foul and surface water.
Job No. 12206

2010
July
Version 4.1
3.0
INTRODUCTION
3.1
BSF Consulting Engineers were commissioned by CDP Architecture Ltd on

behalf of the Client and requested to update the previously prepared Drainage
Impact Assessment for the proposed development of land at Chestfield Farm,
The Drove, Chestfield.
3.2
A revised application for planning is currently being prepared for submission

and the proposals are shown on the A3 reduced Architects drawings included in
Appendix A. The proposed development is for the construction of 5No
residential units.
3.3
The proposed development will be accessed from The Drove as shown on the
Architects Site Plan included in Appendix A with a total site area of 3,995m
(Red
Line
Boundary)
centred
at
Ordnance
Survey
Grid
Reference
(613896,165820).
Job No. 12206

2010
July
4.0
EXISTING SITE
4.1
A topographical
Version 4.1
and impermeable areas survey has been previously
commissioned by the Client and carried out SDS & Associates. A copy of SDS
drawing 201202.01 is included in Appendix A, and has been used as the base
drawing for the existing site drainage plan 12206/A1/101 also included in
Appendix A.
4.2
From the survey it can be seen that there are a number of existing farm
buildings with associated hard standings and an existing house to be
demolished as part of the development.
4.3
Inspection of the sewer records indicates that there are no public surface water
sewers in close proximity to this site. The public foul water sewer is located in
The Drove with an existing lateral connection from Little Grannery just
downstream of manhole TR13658701.
4.4
A study of the geological survey map, Solid and Drift Edition for Faversham sheet 273, indicates that the site to be underlain by London Clay.
Job No. 12206

2010
July
5.0
Version 4.1
FOUL WATER DRAINAGE

EXISTING DISCHARGE
5.1
The impermeable area survey indicates that there is currently 25m of roof
drainage from the existing house, Little Grannery, which is connected to the
public foul sewer; (Area Shaded Red). Below is a screen print of the
MicroDrainage Windes Simulation results indicating the existing peak discharge
rates to the public foul water sewer from a 2 year return period (sewers for
adoption design criteria).
5.2
To enable the completion of the SUR1 mandatory items of BREAAM Code for
Sustainable Homes, the following existing site discharge rates are quoted.
1 year return
Job No. 12206

2010
0.1 litres/second
708 litres discharge (6hr duration)
30 year return 0.2 litres/second
1,565 litres discharge (6hr duration)
100 year return 0.2 litres/second
2,030 litres discharge (6hr duration)
July
5.2
Version 4.1
No access was gained to the existing property to establish the number of

existing appliances, but it would be fair to assume that there is at least one
bathroom and kitchen to the dwelling. In accordance with BS EN 752: Part 4,
the existing foul water element of the discharge is calculated as follows;
Peak Flow Rates

to BS EN 752: Part 4
kDU
Sanitary
Appliance
No of
Features
DU
DU
Bathroom
WC's
Washbasin
Bath
1
1
1
1.20
0.60
1.30
1.20
0.60
1.30
Kitchen
Sink
W/machine
1
1
1.30
0.80
1.30
0.80
frequency factor (0.5 for domestic use)
Q=kDU(DU)
5.20
Q= 1.14 l/s
5.3
The existing peak discharge via the existing 100mm lateral to the public foul
water sewer is calculated as being 2.04 litres/second (0.9 l/s roof water and
1.14l/s foul flow).
Job No. 12206

2010
July
Version 4.1
PROPOSED DISCHARGE
5.4
The site proposals include for 5N Units.
In accordance with Sewers for
th
Adoption 6 Edition, the design flow from the proposed development is 0.23
litres/second, calculated as follows;
DWF = 5 units @4000l/s per unit

24 hours
5.5
20 m
day
0.23 l/s
In accordance with BS EN 752: Part 4, the predicted peak discharge from the
proposal is as follows;
Peak Flow Rates

to BS EN 752: Part 4
Sanitary
Appliance
Unit 1
Unit 2&3
Unit 4
Unit 4
5.6
WC's
Washbasin
Bath
Showers
Kitchen Sink
Wash Machine
WC's
Washbasin
Bath
Showers
Kitchen Sink
Wash Machine
WC's
Washbasin
Bath
Kitchen Sink
Wash Machine
WC's
Washbasin
Bath
Kitchen Sink
Wash Machine
kDU
frequency factor (0.5 for domestic use)
No of
Features
DU
DU
3
3
1
1
1
1
2x3
2x3
2x1
2x1
2x1
2x1
4
4
3
1
1
4
4
3
1
1
1.20
0.30
0.80
0.30
0.80
0.50
1.20
0.30
0.80
0.30
0.80
0.50
1.20
0.30
0.80
0.80
0.50
1.20
0.30
0.80
0.80
0.50
3.60
0.90
0.80
0.30
0.80
0.50
6.90
7.20
1.80
1.60
0.60
1.60
1.00
13.80
4.80
1.20
2.40
0.80
0.50
9.70
4.80
1.20
2.40
0.80
0.50
9.70
40.10
Q=kDU(DU)
Q= 3.16 l/s
The predicted design flow from the proposed residential development is

calculated as being 0.23 litres/second, with a peak discharge of 3.16
litres/second.
Job No. 12206

2010
July
Job No. 12206

2010
Version 4.1
10
July
Version 4.1
CONSENTS
5.7
An outline foul water disposal system design is included within Appendix A as

drawing 12206/A1/102. A Section 106 Water Industry Act application to connect
to the public sewer will need to be made to, and approved, by Southern Water
Services.
5.8
It can be noted from the outline design that the existing private lateral will be
utilised for one of the new properties, and a new manhole connection made for
the remaining properties in order to comply with the requirements of sewers for
adoption; i.e. the connection of more than 3 properties must via a manhole.
Job No. 12206

2010
11
July
6.0
Version 4.1
SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE

EXISTING DISCHARGE
6.1
The impermeable area survey indicates that the existing site has a total
impermeable area of 1,116m.
This comprises of 643m of roof drainage
discharging to soakaways, 117m of roof drainage discharging direct to the

ground, and 356m of concrete hard standing shedding to the ground.
6.2
As mentioned in section 4.0, there are no public surface water sewers in the
vicinity of the site. The underlying geology is London Clay making the use of
soakaways impractical due to the extremely low permeability.
It is therefore
extremely likely that the existing surface water from the impermeable areas
migrate to the existing pond on the site either via a perched water table, or
through saturated topsoil, or via a land-drainage network.
The pond then
discharges to the surrounding open watercourses via a similar system.
The
existing site is therefore considered as a Greenfield development.
6.3
In accordance with the ADAS 345 method, the existing peak flood flow from the
Greenfield site is calculated as Qbar = 2.4 l/s, using the following parameters;
Area = 0.400 hectare (3,995m red line area)
Catchment Length = 83m
Average Slope = 1:160
AAR = 630mm (agro-climatic area 34)
Soil Type = 1.0 (very slow)
6.4
This equates to a Greenfield Run-off rate of 6 litres/hectare.
Job No. 12206

2010
12
July
Version 4.1
SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
6.5
The following SUDS techniques have been considered, with the preferred
solution following the hierarchy of sustainability as established by the
Environment Agency and included in the Environment Agency publication: SUDS
A Practical Guide1. This hierarchy is shown below as Table 1.
Table 1 - SUDS Hierarchy from the EA publication: SUDS - A Practical Guide
6.6
Taking these techniques in order, the potential application within the proposed
development are considered below:
Job No. 12206

2010
Living roofs the steep pitched roofs are not suitable for water attenuating
green roofs.
Basins and ponds The applicant controls land to the rear of the proposed
development providing ample area for the creation of a new pond with an
overflow to the existing water coarse.
Infiltration systems The underlying geology is London Clay making the
use the use of infiltrations systems in-effective
Permeable surfaces The private drives and access could incorporate
permeable paving.
13
July
Version 4.1
Tanked systems Runoff from site could be attenuated using underground

tanked or stormcell systems although is superseded by a higher ranking
sustainable solution.
PROPOSED DISCHARGE
6.7
The proposed development will generate approximately 1,486m of impermeable

area, comprising of roof drainage, access road, and private drives as indicated on
the proposed site plan.
6.8
The intention is to install a new balancing pond with a permanent wet bottom for
bio-diversity, and attenuate the outflow from the pond to the equivalent
Greenfield Run-off rate from the existing site. It should be noted that whilst this
rate has been calculated to the equivalent of 6litres/hectare, the actual
attenuated rate used has been limited to 4 litres/hectares as required by the
Canterbury City Council Drainage Impact Assessment for Development
Proposals Guidance Notes dated March 2003. The discharge from the pond will
therefore need to be
1,486m x 4 litres/hectare, which equates to 0.60
litres/second.
6.9
Previous experience with Canterbury City Council Drainage Engineers has

confirmed that 0.6 litres/second is the about the lowest controllable discharge
rate, and has been achieved using a 50mm diameter pipe at a gradient of 1in333.
( Table A8 of Tables for Hydraulic Design of Pipes.)
Job No. 12206

2010
14
July
6.10
Version 4.1
A storage estimate with the above parameters indicated a storage pond with a
volume of up to 124m, depending on the efficiency of the flow control device,
would be required.
6.11
A draft network as indicated on the schematic drainage proposal drawing

12206/A1/102 has been prepared and is included as Appendix B to demonstrate
the adequacy of a storage pond of 124m with the outflow controlled to 0.6 l/s.
Please note that a pump has been used for modelling purposes only, as the
Windes software does not include for pipes below 100mm diameter.
CONSENTS
6.12
The ditch that the proposed pond will discharge to is within the riparian ownership
of the Client, and therefore consent is not required any other third party.
6.13
The site does not sit within a source protection zone, and considering the low risk
discharge, it is unlikely that any special protection measures will be required.
Job No. 12206

2010
15
July
Version 4.1
7.0
FLOOD RISK
7.1
An inspection of the Environment Agency web site has identified that this site is
not located in an area at risk of flooding and therefore a separate Flood Risk
Assessment is not required.
Fig1. Extract of Environment Agency Flood Map
Job No. 12206

2010
16
July
7.2
Version 4.1
Flood Risk Assessment Pro Forma

In accordance with Planning Policy Statement 25, Development and Flood Risk,
December 2006 (PPS25) and the accompanying Practice Companion Guide,
February 2007, the following Pro Forma has been prepared;
Flood Risk Assessment Pro Forma

1
Development description and location
1a
What type of development is proposed and where will it be located?
Section 4.0
1b
What is its vulnerability classification?
More Vulnerable (Residential)
1c
Is the proposed development consistent with the Local Development Documents?
Yes
1d
Provide evidence that the Sequential Test and where necessary the Exception Test has been
applied in the selection of this site for this development type.
Zone 1 Low Probability - All uses of land are appropriate in this zone.
Definition of the flood hazard
2a
What sources of flooding could affect the site?
2b
Flooding from rivers or fluvial flooding

Flooding from the sea or tidal flooding
Flooding from land
Flooding from groundwater
Flooding from sewers
Flooding from reservoirs, canals, and other artificial sources
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
For each identified source, describe how flooding would occur, with reference to any historic
records wherever these are available.
None Known to Client
2c
What are the existing surface water drainage arrangements for the site?
Some roof area to the public foul water sewer, with the balance to an existing pond
Job No. 12206

2010
17
July
Version 4.1
fronting the site, but not in the control of the Client.
Probability
3a
Which flood zone is the site within
Flood Zone 1 Low Probability

3b
If there is a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) covering this site, what does it show?
No
3c
What is the probability of the site flooding taking account of the contents of the SFRA and of any
further site specific assessment?
Low Probability
3d
What are the existing rates of run-off generated by the site?

Qbar = 2.4 l/s,
Climate Change
4a
How is flood risk at the site likely to be affected by climate change?
Attenuation pond designed to cater for 1in100 year storms with 30% allowance for climate
changes in accordance with BREEAM code for sustainable homes SUR1
Detailed Development Proposals
5a
Please provide details of the development layout, referring to the relevant drawings?
Drawing as per Appendix A

5b
Where appropriate, demonstrate how land-uses most sensitive to flood damage have been placed
in areas within the site that are at least risk of flooding.
N/A
6
Flood Risk Management Measures
6a
How will the site be protected from flooding, including the potential impacts of climate change over
the developments lifetime?
As 4a
7
Off Site Impacts
7a
How will you ensure that your proposed development and the measures to protect your site will
not increase flood risk elsewhere?
Job No. 12206

2010
18
July
Version 4.1
Discharge to ground with suitable SUDS Solutions to mimic existing situation

7b
How will you prevent run-off from the development causing an impact elsewhere?
As 4a
Residual Risk
8a
What flooding risks will remain after you have implemented the measures to protect the site from
flooding?
None
8b
How, and by whom, will these risks be managed over the lifetime of the development?
None required
Job No. 12206

2010
19
July
8.0
Version 4.1
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon our observations and investigations, we conclude the following:-
8.1
The foul water design flow from the proposed development is anticipated to be
0.23litres/, which is lower than that currently being discharged to the public foul
sewer.
8.2
The existing Greenfield run-off rate for the development site (3,995m) is
calculated to be 2.4 litres/second (6 litres/hectare) in accordance with ADAS345
methods. The introduction of the SUDS attenuation pond will reduce this run-off
rate for the new impermeable area to an equivalent of 4 litres/hectare (0.6
litres/seconds for 1,486m). The post development run-off rate for the whole site
will therefore be reduced to 2.1 litres/second.
8.3
The foul and surface water disposal solutions are summarised and indicated on
drawing 12206/A1/102 included within Appendix A, with supporting calculations
for the outline network designs included within Appendix B.
8.4
A Section 106 application to connect to the public foul water sewer will need to
be made to and approved by Southern Water Services.
8.5
The ditch that the proposed pond will discharge to within the riparian ownership
of the Client, and therefore consent is not required any other third party.
8.6
In accordance with Planning Policy Statement 25, Development and Flood Risk,
December 2006, a Flood Risk Pro Forma has been prepared and concluded
that the site is not at risk from flooding and that the proposals will not increase
the risk of flooding elsewhere.
Job No. 12206

2010
20
July
Version 4.1
APPENDIX A
BSF Drawings
12206/A3/100 Site Location Plan
12206/A3/101 Existing Site Drainage
12206/A3/102 Schematic Drainage Proposals
Architects Drawings
Impermeable Area Plan SDS 201202.01
Job No. 12206

2010
21
July
Drawing No.
Drain
Drain
166000m
614100m
Drain
614000m
Random
D rain
Pond
Notes
Pond
Drain
613900m
613800m
Drain
Revision
12206/A3/100
24
1.
This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Engineers, Architects

and Designers drawings.
2.
This drawing must not be scaled. For all dimensions, levels and setting out
information see Architects drawings.
3.
All workmanship and method of construction should comply with all relevant
Codes of Practice, British Standards, the current edition of the Building
Regulations and good building practice.
Legend
Ottersend
Drain
Planning Boundary
1
Tinkers
Meadow
Orchard End
Drain
a
Tr
Seafield
Tythe
Barn House
ac
Tr
Brookfield
Mead House
d
an
ck
an
th
Pa
Land owned by Applicant
th
Pa
North
Leas Gate
Tythe Barn
Sea
View
South
Tythe Barn
D rain
Alcrest
Kennel Meadow
The Paddock
Cottage
El Sub Sta
Huntsman's
Cottage
165900m
Portways
14.3m
Paddock South
Wedgewood
BM 14.6 6m
Rev
Description
Date
By
Ckd
Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document and all related documents,
drawings, etc., including calculations, is invested in BSF Consulting Engineers Limited and cannot
be used or reproduced for any other purpose than that for which they have been created without
the express permission in writing by BSF Consulting Engineers Limited.
The Old Farm House
Westwell
CLIENT
Badgers End
The Manor House

Pond
Pond
Mole House
Pond
Ponds
ENGINEERS
BSF CONSULTING
Chestfield Farm
Development
Site
Drain
53/54 St Dunstans Street

Canterbury, Kent CT28BS
tel: 01227 464811
fax: 01227 459051
www.bsfconsultants.co.uk
office@bsfconsultants.co.uk
PROJECT TITLE
Red Roofs
165800m
Little Granary
Proposed Houses at
Chestfield Farm
THE DROVE
7
19
23
11
Takamaka
DRAWING TITLE
Chestfield Farm House
D rain
17
Newstead
Site Location Plan
Drove Cottage
5
6
Pond
SCALE
Harbinger
1:1250
DESIGNED
Minarto
Drain
SE
CLO
Huddleston
GA
CHECKED
DATE
SIZE
27-07-2010
APPROVED
STATUS
13
Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Plan with the Permission of the
Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright
Licence No AL51807A0001
DRAWN
A3
DATE
BSF Project No.
Preliminary
DRAWING No.
100
REVISION
12206/A3/100
Drawing No.
Revision.
12206/A1/101
Existing Drainage Plan
scale 1:200
Westwell
Plan reproduced from SDS

drawing 201201.01
Notes
1.

2.
3.
Legend
Badgers End
Planning Boundary
Land owned by Applicant
T EL/O
H
The Manor House
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
WATER
GAS
WATER
GAS
GAS
ELEC/OH
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
TEL/OH
OIL
CATV
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
ELEC/OH
se
TEL/OH
TEL/OH
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
ELEC/OH
TEL/OH
ELEC/OH
Rev
Date
Description
By
Ckd
CLIENT
ELEC/OH

ELEC/OH
ELEC/OH
ofs
ELEC/OH
ELEC/OH
CONSULTING
BSF ENGINEERS

tel: 01227 464811
fax: 01227 459051
PROJECT TITLE
ELEC/OH
Proposed Houses at
Chestfield Farm
DRAWING TITLE
THE DROVE
Existing Drainage Plan
SCALE
1:200
DESIGNED
DRAWN
DATE
GA
CHECKED
SIZE
27-07-2010
APPROVED
STATUS
A1
DATE
BSF Project No.
PRELIMINARY
DRAWING No.
12206
REVISION
12206/A1/101
Drawing No.
Revision.
12206/A1/102
Proposed Drainage Plan
scale 1:200
The Manor House
Notes
1.

2.
3.
Legend
RE
RE
Planning Boundary
Existing Pond
Existing Private Foul Water Drain

Existing Private Foul Water Drain
To be Abandoned
MH
Proposed Foul Water Drainage
Existing Pond
Proposed Surface Water Drainage
MH
Section 106 application to connect to the
public sewer required to be made to and
approved by Southern Water Services
225mm
Mole House
MH
Contractor to make allowance for the

private road opening licence under the
New Roads and Streetworks Act.
MH
MH
New pond to create 124m of
storage, pond to remain partially full
creating permanent wet feature.
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
New foul water mahole to be

constructed in 'The Drove'
MH
MH
RE
MH
MH
MH
RE
RE
Proposed Pond
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
225mm
MH
MH
MH
MH
New outfall to local
ditch, headwall to be
'JKH General
Purpose Headwall'
or similar approved.
RE
MH MH
MH
Red Roofs
Existing ditch
MH
MH
MH
Outfall to existing ditch
from 50mm pipe = 0.6 l/s
MH
MH
TR13658701
CL=15.649
IL=13.149
Rev
RE
RE
29-07-10
Pond relocated, blue boundary removed.
GA
Date
Description
By
Ckd
Existing lateral
utilised for Unit ONE
CLIENT

Section Through Pond
Proposed Pond
CONSULTING
BSF ENGINEERS
Existing ditch
scale 1:25
Ditch profile
'JKH GRC 300 series'

spillway headwall or similar
approved
Tel:01638 713795

tel: 01227 464811
fax: 01227 459051
PROJECT TITLE
Storage area
Headwall anchor installed

as backfilling is completed
JKH General Purpose

Headwall
GRC lightweight recessed
headwall, batter angle not
less than 45
Tel:01638 713795
Proposed Houses at
Chestfield Farm
Outfall ditch
DRAWING TITLE
Schematic Drainage Plan

Invert TBC
500
225mm Incoming pipe
50mm Outfall pipe to ditch

50mm Outfall pipe
DRAWN
SCALE
1:200
DATE
GA
DESIGNED
CHECKED
SIZE
27-07-2010
APPROVED
STATUS
A1
DATE
BSF Project No.
PRELIMINARY
DRAWING No.
12206/A1/102
12206
REVISION
Existing
Landscaping to be
trimed and
retained
Proposed 1800mm
timber fence to
boundary
NORTH
Access to
unit 3 garden
through
carport
Existing
Landscaping around
pond to be retained
and added to
Car port
Existing
Landscaping to be
retained
Proposed
landscaped
green space
ate
to indic y.
d line
D ashe rear boundar
us
previo
Propose
d fence
line
Existing landscaping
retained
Public footpath
ARCHITECTURE
trimed and
CDP Architecture Ltd

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
enquiries@architectscanterbury.com
www.architectscanterbury.com
ARCHITECTURE

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
ARCHITECTURE

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
ARCHITECTURE

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
ARCHITECTURE

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
ARCHITECTURE

22-23 North Lane
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7EE
Tel 01227 458181
Fax 01227 451543
Version 4.1
APPENDIX B
Windes Calculations
Greenfield Run-off Rate
Outline Surface Water Network Design
Job No. 12206

2010
22
July

Chestfield Drainage Impact Assessment

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Chestfield Drainage Impact Assessment

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

DRAINAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Proposed Residential Development

Hollamby Estates (2005) Ltd

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

Document Control Sheet

Proposed Residential Development

Drainage Impact Assessment

Andy Tull CDP Architecture

Final for Planning

Andy Tull CDP Architecture

Mike Wicks CDP Architecture

New Scheme 1 Draft 26.07.10

Mike Wicks CDP Architecture

Final (pdf issue)

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

A Report on a Drainage Impact Assessment for the proposed Residential Development

Foul Water Drainage...

Surface Water Drainage. 10

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

Greenfield Run-off Rate

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

This Report is in accordance with the requirements of the Canterbury City

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

BSF Consulting Engineers were commissioned by CDP Architecture Ltd on

A revised application for planning is currently being prepared for submission

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

and impermeable areas survey has been previously

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

FOUL WATER DRAINAGE

Job No. 12206

708 litres discharge (6hr duration)

30 year return 0.2 litres/second

1,565 litres discharge (6hr duration)

100 year return 0.2 litres/second

2,030 litres discharge (6hr duration)

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

No access was gained to the existing property to establish the number of

Peak Flow Rates

frequency factor (0.5 for domestic use)

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

The site proposals include for 5N Units.

In accordance with Sewers for

DWF = 5 units @4000l/s per unit

Peak Flow Rates

frequency factor (0.5 for domestic use)

The predicted design flow from the proposed residential development is

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

An outline foul water disposal system design is included within Appendix A as

Job No. 12206

BSF Consulting Engineers Limited

SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE

This comprises of 643m of roof drainage

discharging to soakaways, 117m of roof drainage discharging direct to the

The pond then