Egba Split-Clamps Limited

Limited

Form 113: Staff Performance Appraisal

1.
1.1

Instructions
In rating the staff members performance below, please bear in mind the staff members level
of duties and responsibilities so as not judge him/her by inappropriate standards or by
personality traits unrelated to his/her work.

1.2

Item 3.1.10 is to be rated only for staff members whose duties involve supervisory
responsibility and items 3.1.11 3.1.13 only for staff members in management positions.

1.3
2.
2.1

For items which are of no special importance to the staff members functions or to which the
reporting officer has insufficient evidence to make an assessment, enter Not Applicable
(N.A.)
Particulars of the staff member
Name:.

2.2

Educational Qualification:

2.3

Work Experience in years:

-

With ESCL ....

Outside ESCL .

2.4
2.5

Position...
Period of Report..

2.6

Type of Appraisal .

3.0
3.1

Ratings
Mark the appropriate rating below, which most nearly describe the staff members
performance and conduct.

Performance and
Conduct

3.1.1

Professional/technical
Competence (Knowledge,
skills and experience the
staff member possesses in
his/her field of work;
ability to stay abreast of
latest developments).

3.1.2

Quality of work
accomplished.

Form 113, Rev. 0, 12th Nov, 2012

RAT I N G
Outstanding
5

Very
Good
4

Page 1 of 4

RAT I N G

Satisfactory
3

Below
Standard
2

Poor
1

Performance and
Conduct

Outstanding
5

3.1.3

Quantity of work
accomplished.

3.1.4

Speed of work (ability to

meets schedules and
deadlines when required).

3.1.5

Initiative (demonstrated
aptitude to produce new
ideas and/or bring about
constructive innovation).

3.1.6

Ability to work
independently or with
minimum supervision.

3.1.7

Work relationship
(Effectiveness in working
harmoniously with other
staff members or persons
outside the organization in
official contacts).

3.1.8

Punctuality as regards
working hours.

3.1.9

Written and oral

expression in working
language (ability to
communicate in a clear
concise and effective
manner).

3.1.10

Effectiveness in
supervision (ability to
motivate, maintain and
direct a productive work
unit).

3.1.11

Planning and organization

of work (effectiveness of
plans, programmes and
objectives developed;
skillful use of time and
resources to achieve a
maximum efficiency).

Form 113, Rev. 0, 12th Nov, 2012

Very
Good
4

Page 2 of 4

R AT I N G

Satisfactory
3

Below
Standard
2

Poor
1

Performance and
Conduct

Outstanding
5

Very
Good
4

Satisfactory
3

Below
Standard
2

3.1.12 Skill in producing a

solution (ability to
identify problems,
power of analysis and
soundness of
recommendations and
decisions).
3.1.13 Ability to negotiate and
persuade.

AVERAGE RATING
3.2

Comment here below on the staff members attitude to work in ESCL.

3.3

The most important areas for improvement, training and development are:

3.4

Comment here on any other points which have not been adequately covered
and which would add significantly to the evaluation of the staff member.

Form 113, Rev. 0, 12th Nov, 2012

Page 3 of 4

4.0

Concluding Remarks

4.1

If the average rating of the staff member is below standards, mark one of the
boxers provided below:

Poor
1

4.1.1

The staff member needs advice to improve her/his

performance and conduct.

4.1.2

The staff member should be transferred to another

post of similar grade.

4.1.3

The staff member should be demoted.

4.1.4

The staff member is incapable and his/her

dismissal is therefore recommended.

4.2

For a staff member on probation:

4.2.1

Since the average rating is satisfactory or better;

the staff member should be accorded a career appointment.

4.2.2

Since the average rating is below satisfactory

level but far better than below standard, the period
of probation should be extended for six months.

4.2.3

Since the average rating is below standard,

dismissal of the staff member is recommended.

After all sections above have been completed, the staff member must sign the original of the report
and be given a copy thereof. The signature merely acknowledges that the staff member has read the
report and received a copy; it does not necessarily indicate agreement with the evaluations contained
in this report.
I have read this report and received a copy thereof. I understand that I may, if I wish, submit a
written statement of explanation or rebuttal within one month of receipt of this report.

Date: Signature of Staff Member ..

Signature of Supervisor
Date: ..

Form 113, Rev. 0, 12th Nov, 2012

Name & Title

..

Page 4 of 4