Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A Thesis
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION
University of Eastern Philippines
University Town, Northern Samar
OCTOBER 2010
APPROVAL SHEET
This thesis titled THE EFFECT OF COMPUTER-AIDED
INSTRUCTION ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THIRD YEAR
STUDENTS
IN
SCIENCE
AND
TECHNOLOGY
III
AT
CAWAYAN
INTEGRATED SCHOOL, DIVISION OF NORTHERN SAMAR, prepared
and submitted by MARLO D. ALVAREZ, in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS IN
EDUCATION,
is
hereby
recommended
for
approval
and
acceptance.
MINDANILLA B. BROTO, DA
Adviser
Date: ___________
_______________________________________
Recommended for Acceptance and Approval
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
PROF. JOSE P. CHING JR.
Member
Date: __________
_______________________________________
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Education.
ii
ABSTRACT
TITLE
RESEARCHER
ADVISER
MINDANILLA B. BROTO, DA
SCHOOL
YEAR
2010
DEGREE CONFERRED
===========================================================
This study tried to find out the effect of computeraided instruction on the academic performance of third year
students
in
Integrated
Science
School,
specifically,
it
aimed
in
Science
Technology
instruction
performance
Science
and
the
the
of
to
pretest
(control
in
Technology
Division
performance
and
and
III
not
III
the
using
group);
Technology
Northern
determine
of
pretest
III
the
the
using
the
More
academic
taught
in
computer-aided
the
students
the
Cawayan
Samar.
students
ascertain
of
at
academic
taught
in
computer-aided
difference
in
the
students
academic
iii
computer-aided instruction (experimental group) and those
who
were
not
performance
Science
in
and
instruction
the
group);
posttest
Technology
III
(control
performance
Science
(control
in
and
the
of
not
Technology
the
students
the
the
taught
the
students
using
academic
in
computer-aided
ascertain
of
III
the
using
group);
posttest
determine
the
academic
taught
in
computer-aided
difference
in
the
students
academic
difference
between
the
pretest
and
posttest
subjects
of
the
of
this
Cawayan
study
were
Integrated
the
School
third
year
particularly
study
Group
was
Design.
Pretest-Posttest
This
design
is
Nonequivalent
often
used
in
iv
control group was exposed to traditional lecture-discussion
method
while
the
experimental
group
was
given
the
to
measure
the
instrument
used
performance
of
was
the
designed
students
along
with
the
of
Education.
It
was
administered
by
the
presentations
were
devised
by
the
taught
using
the
traditional
method
lacked
mean
score
of
the
pretest
of
the
experimental
v
Comparing
the
pretest
results
of
both
control
and
posttest
was
given
to
the
control
group.
Its
experimental
group
was
given
posttest
and
the
after
the
students
were
exposed
to
the
posttest
results
of
the
computer-aided instruction.
Comparison
between
the
have
no
strategies
significant
were
difference.
effective
in
It
means
teaching
that
both
Science
and
Technology III.
Under the control group, the result of the comparison
between the pretest and posttest showed that there was a
significant
difference
in
the
pretest
and
the
posttest
vi
Under
the
experimental
group,
the
result
of
the
This
means
that
there
was
gain
in
the
was
of
performance
administered.
computer-aided
of
the
third
Hence,
there
instruction
year
was
on
students
in
the
positive
academic
Science
and