Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The original model was designed to mirror the functioning of radio and telephone
technologies. Their initial model consisted of three primary parts: sender, channel, and receiver. The
sender was the part of a telephone a person spoke into, the channel was the telephone itself, and the
receiver was the part of the phone where one could hear the other person. Shannon and Weaver also
recognized that often there is static that interferes with one listening to a telephone conversation, which
they deemed noise. The noise could also mean the absence of signal. In a simple model, often referred to
as the transmission model or standard view of communication, information or content (e.g. a message
in natural language) is sent in some form (as spoken language) from an emisor/ sender/ encoder to a
destination/ receiver/ decoder. This common conception of communication views communication as a
means of sending and receiving information. The strengths of this model are simplicity, generality, and
quantifiability. Social scientists Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver structured this model based on the
following elements: An information source, which produces a message. A transmitter, which encodes the
message into signals. A channel, to which signals are adapted for transmission. A receiver, which
'decodes' (reconstructs) the message from the signal. A destination, where the message arrives. Shannon
and Weaver argued that there were three levels of problems for communication within this theory. The
technical problem: how accurately can the message be transmitted? The semantic problem: how precisely
is the meaning 'conveyed'? The effectiveness problem: how effectively does the received meaning affect
behavior? Daniel Chandler critiques the transmission model by stating: It assumes communicators are
isolated individuals. No allowance for differing purposes. No allowance for differing interpretations. No
allowance for unequal power relations. No allowance for situational contexts.
Schramm. Communication is usually described along a few major dimensions: Message (what type of
things are communicated), source / emisor / sender / encoder (by whom), form (in which form), channel
(through which medium), destination / receiver / target /decoder (to whom), and Receiver. Wilbur
Schramm (1954) also indicated that we should also examine the impact that a message has (both desired
and undesired) on the target of the message. Between parties, communication includes acts that confer
knowledge and experiences, give advice and commands, and ask questions. These acts may take many
forms, in one of the various manners of communication. The form depends on the abilities of the group
communicating. Together, communication content and form make messages that are sent towards a
destination. The target can be oneself, another person or being, another entity (such as a corporation or
group of beings). Communication can be seen as processes of information transmission governed by three
levels of semiotic rules: Syntactic (formal properties of signs and symbols), Pragmatic (concerned with
the relations between signs/expressions and their users) and Semantic (study of relationships between
signs and symbols and what they represent). Therefore, communication is social interaction where at least
two interacting agents share a common set of signs and a common set of semiotic rules. This commonly
held rule in some sense ignores autocommunication, including intrapersonal communication via diaries or
self-talk, both secondary phenomena that followed the primary acquisition of communicative
competences within social interactions.
Transactional Model. It assumes that people are connected through communication; they engage in
transaction. Firstly, it recognizes that each of us is a sender-receiver, not merely a sender or a receiver.
Secondly, it recognizes that communication affects all parties involved. So communication is
fluid/simultaneous. This is how most conversation are like. The transactional model also contains ellipses
that symbolize the communication environment (how you interpret the data that you are given). Where
the ellipses meet is the most effect communication area because both communicators share the same
meaning of the message. For example talking/listening to friends. While your friend is talking you are
constantly giving them feedback on what you think through your facial expression verbal feedback
without necessarily stopping your friend from talking.
Summarizing a text, or distilling its essential concepts into a paragraph or two, is a useful study
tool as well as good writing practice. A summary has two aims: (1) to reproduce the overarching
ideas in a text, identifying the general concepts that run through the entire piece, and (2) to
express these overarching ideas using precise, specific language. When you summarize, you
cannot rely on the language the author has used to develop his or her points, and you must find a
way to give an overview of these points without your own sentences becoming too general. You
must also make decisions about which concepts to leave in and which to omit, taking into
consideration your purposes in summarizing and also your view of what is important in this text.
Here are some methods for summarizing:First, prior to skimming, use some of the previewing
techniques.
1. Include the title and identify the author in your first sentence.
2. The first sentence or two of your summary should contain the authors thesis, or central
concept, stated in your own words. This is the idea that runs through the entire text--the
one youd mention if someone asked you: What is this piece/article about? Unlike
student essays, the main idea in a primary document or an academic article may not be
stated in one location at the beginning. Instead, it may be gradually developed throughout
the piece or it may become fully apparent only at the end.
3. When summarizing a longer article, try to see how the various stages in the explanation
or argument are built up ingroups of related paragraphs. Divide the article into sections if
it isnt done in the published form. Then, write a sentence or two to cover the key ideas in
each section.
4. Omit ideas that are not really central to the text. Dont feel that you must reproduce the
authors exact progression of thought. (On the other hand, be careful not to misrepresent
ideas by omitting important aspects of the authors discussion).
5. In general, omit minor details and specific examples. (In some texts, an extended
example may be a key part of the argument, so you would want to mention it).
6. Avoid writing opinions or personal responses in your summaries (save these for active
reading responses or tutorial discussions).
7. Be careful not to plagiarize the authors words. If you do use even a few of the authors
words, they must appear inquotation marks. To avoid plagiarism, try writing the first
draft of your summary without looking back at the original text.
SUMMARIZING
Summarizing, like paraphrasing, is a technique used to obtain the essential part of an original
source. In other words, it is a concise statement of the most important points taken from another
text. It is a good technique to use when writing a research paper. Important things to remember
when summarizing an article are the following:
Read the text until the meaning or main idea of the passage is clear.
Put the original text away to discourage any similarities between the summary and the source.
Use your own words!
Be concise. Use only the central points of the source, anything that is not relevant to the main
point should not be considered.
Avoid being repetitive.
It helps to use a highlighter or red pen to indicate the most important points of the article.
Juxtapose your summary with the original text. If they look the same then its not really a
summary.
-43
10-43 s
10-35 s
Big Bang
infinite
Planck Time
1032 K
1027 K
1027 K
End of GUT
10
15
4 forces in nature,
protons and neutrons start forming from
quarks
10-7 s
Heavy Particle
1014 K
10-4 s
Light particle
1012 K
100 s (a few
minutes)
Nucleosynthesis era
109 - 107 K
Recombination
380,000 years
(Decoupling)
3000 K
500 million
yrs
Galaxy formation
10 K
14 billion
years
or so
Now
3K
But many return to ask about the lessons they missed or ask for information they have forgotten. Often
they return to use the library computers. Some of them come, brandishing their new laptops, so they could
use the librarys Wi-Fi.