Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
Review
Environmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
School of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
c
Bioresource, Paper and Coatings Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
b
h i g h l i g h t s
Trace element supplementation improves the anaerobic digestion performance.
Fe, Ni, Co are the most desirable trace elements in the anaerobic digestion system.
Multi-elements supplementation can be more beneficial.
Response of trace element supplementation is uncertain.
Future research should consider crucial aspect of trace element bioavailability.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 January 2016
Received in revised form 1 March 2016
Accepted 3 March 2016
Available online 10 March 2016
Keywords:
Trace element supplementation
Anaerobic digestion
Metalloenzyme
Methanogenesis
Bioavailability
a b s t r a c t
This paper critically reviews the impacts of supplementing trace elements on the anaerobic digestion performance. The in-depth knowledge of trace elements as micronutrients and metalloenzyme components
justifies trace element supplementation into the anaerobic digestion system. Most of the earlier studies
reported that trace elements addition at (sub)optimum dosages had positive impacts mainly longer term
on digester stability with greater organic matter degradation, low volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration
and higher biogas production. However, these positive impacts and element requirements are not fully
understood, they are explained on a case to case basis because of the great variance of the anaerobic
digestion operation. Iron (Fe), nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) are the most studied and desirable elements.
The right combination of multi-elements supplementation can have greater positive impact. This measure is highly recommended, especially for the mono-digestion of micronutrient-deficient substrates.
The future research should consider the aspect of trace element bioavailability.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roles of trace elements in anaerobic digestion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Trace element composition of methanogens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Metalloenzymes in methanogenesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
Trace elements in hydrolysis, acidogenesis, and acetogenesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impacts of single trace element supplementation on anaerobic digestion performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Iron (Fe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
Nickel (Ni) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.
Cobalt (Co) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.
Influential factor that causes the impacts variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impacts of multiple trace elements supplementation on anaerobic digestion performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crucial consideration: Trace element bioavailability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
370
370
370
371
371
372
372
372
372
372
373
374
370
6.
7.
5.1.
Methodology to determine trace element bioavailability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.
Trace elements bioavailability of anaerobic digestion feedstock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.
Chelating agents to increase trace element bioavailability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Appendix A. Supplementary data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
374
377
377
377
377
377
378
378
Methanobacterium
bryantii
Methanothermobacter
marburgensis
Methanobrevibacter
arboriphilicus
Methanobrevibacter
smithii
Methanosarcina mazei
Methanosarcina
vacuolata
Methanosarcina
thermophila
Methanosarcina barkeri
Methanosarcina barkeri
Methanosarcina barkeri
DSMNo
Content (ppm)
Fe
Ni
Co
Mo
Zn
Mn
Cu
862
1350
150
20
25
250
160
2133
1500
110
10
25
50
<5
<10
744
1300
65
15
40
440
20
861
1100
95
90
25
630
25
2053
1232
720
1600
95
70
35
30
<10
30
170
260
5
15
10
40
1825
1600
150
50
<10
230
<10
800
1538
804
1100
1200
2150
65
60
135
30
25
60
25
45
60
300
370
130
10
10
5
10
35
10
371
Substrate
Species
References
Fe
Ni
H2/CO2
Methanol
H2/CO2
H2/CO2
H2/CO2
Formate
Methanol
H2/CO2
H2/CO2
Formate
H2/CO2
Methanol
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum
Methanosarcina barkeri
Methanobacterium smithii
Methanobacterium bryantii
Methanococcus voltae
Methanococcus vannielii
Methanosarcina barkeri
Methanococcus voltae
Methanococcus maripaludis
Methanococcus vannielii
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum
Methanosarcina barkeri
1.8
0.0059
0.059
0.295
0.12
0.079
0.079
0.79
0.79
18.3
>0.00096a
0.048a
Co
Se
W
Mo
a
monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-coenzyme A synthase (Cdh) complex enzyme, which the structure of its subunit CdhA was found to
contain the elements Fe and Ni (Harrop and Mascharak, 2005). On
the other hand, formylmethabofuran dehydrogenase contains two
isoenzymes which need at least one binding element of Mo or
tungsten (W) to initiate the biochemical reaction of CO2/H2 pathway (Hochheimer et al., 1998). Last but not least, the enzyme CH3H4M(S)PT-coenzyme M methyltransferase (Mtr) contains cofactor
5-hydroxybenzimidazolylcobamide (factor III, with element Co)
and the crystal structure of methyl coenzyme M reductase (Mcr)
which has been discovered with two nickel-containing cofactors
F430 as the active sites (Ferry, 2010).
Based on the pathways, the general trace element requirement
trend for metalloenzymes in methanogenesis can be simplified as
Fe >> Ni > Co > Zn = Mo/W (Glass and Orphan, 2012). This order is
predicted without taking consideration of the substrate medium
which will shift the enzyme ratios, and hence alter the respective
trace elements requirement. Therefore, although the fundamental
understanding of methanogenic pathways has been well understood and established, further research is necessary to assess the
possible mechanism and pathway regulatory factors.
2.3. Trace elements in hydrolysis, acidogenesis, and acetogenesis
Acetate is the key intermediate substrate of aceticlastic pathway which has been discussed in the previous section. Acetogenesis, which converts the carbon compounds such as CO2, CO,
methanol and formate to acetate, involves some metalloenzymes
in the reactions. Typically, the formate dehydrogenase (Fdh) and
carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) are identified by
enzyme-isolating the acetogen Clostridium thermoaceticum
(Ljungdahl, 1986). Table 3 summarized the trace elements in the
metalloenzymes for both acetogenesis and methanogenesis.
Unlike acetogenesis and methonogenesis, the role of trace elements in the stages of hydrolysis and acidogenesis in the anaerobic
digestion process is relatively lacking of research study. Nevertheless, Kim et al. (2003) reported the micronutrients (Fe, Co, and Ni)
Table 3
Trace element in the metalloenzymes.
Enzyme/Cofactor
Process
Trace element(s)
Reaction
References
Formate dehydrogenase
Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase
Hydrogenase
Carbonic anhydrase
Formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase
Methyltransferase/factor III
Methyl-CoM reductase/F430
Acetogenesis
Acetogenesis
Acetogenesis & methanogenesis
Methanogenesis
Methanogenesis
Methanogenesis
Methanogenesis
Fe, Se, W
Fe, Ni, Zn
Fe and/or Ni
Zn
Fe, Mo/W
Co
Ni
Ljungdahl (1986)
Ljungdahl (1986)
Shima et al. (2002)
Glass and Orphan (2012)
Hochheimer et al. (1998)
Ferry (2010)
Ferry (2010)
372
were found critical to optimize the process of hydrolysis and acidogenesis as the trace elements supplementation had increased the
COD solubilization and organic acids production. Likewise, Yu
et al. (2015b) highlighted the supplementation of Fe (III) had accelerated the hydrolysis and the acidification process of a thermophilic
anaerobic digestion system. Logically, this can be explained that the
hydraulic and acidogenic bacteria have benefited from trace elements as the growing factor. For the better understanding of the
other roles of trace elements playing in hydrolysis and acidogenesis, it is highly urged for the future research works.
3. Impacts of single trace element supplementation on
anaerobic digestion performance
3.1. Iron (Fe)
Among various of trace elements, Fe is the most commonly
studied element for the supplementation impact on the anaerobic
digestion due to its high requirement based on the fundamental
knowledge. First and foremost, Park and Novak (2013) demonstrated the direct addition of Fe (III) at 1.25% (by weight) into a
sewage sludge digestion system to remove the odour-causing
byproducts. They observed that the problematic and corrosive
hydrogen sulphide (H2S) which had been reduced by more than
65%. H2S generation is reduced due to the FeS precipitation, which
had consumed the metabolite bisulphide (HS) produced by the
sulfate reducing bacteria. One of the reasons which has stunted
the industrial practice of full scale biogas plant is the high capital
cost which delays the turnover period. Hence, the H2S reduction
in generated biogas composition can lower the processing cost
for H2S removal in order to utilize the biogas at the end. Nevertheless, the precipitate FeS was claimed to be controlling the solubility
of the other nutrient metals, such as Ni and Co (Gustavsson et al.,
2013b). Thus the aspect of trace element bioavailability (Section 5)
should be considered when the measure of Fe-dosing is applied.
The leftover intermediates of hydrolysis and acidogenesis reactions such as propionate and butyrate are required to be converted
into acetate before undergoing the methanogenesis. The accumulation of these intermediates will greatly inhibit the overall process
of anaerobic digestion. For this, the method of Fe0 supplementation
had been discovered to be useful in increasing the propionate conversion rate by having more propionate-utilizing and homoacetogenic bacteria (Meng et al., 2013). In fact, the Fe dosing time was
found to be influential on balancing the system of anaerobic digestion, which the 72th-hour after digester start-up was the most
suitable dosing time (Yu et al., 2015b). Yet, this factor has not been
emphasized for the other trace elements.
By considering the additional cost needed in nutrient (Fechemical) addition, the substrate which contains sufficient trace
elements will be favorable to be the alternative supplement. The
Fe-rich activated sludge (1350 mg Fe L1) was claimed to be a suitable co-substrate by De Vrieze et al. (2013) which had significantly
enhanced the methane generation by 326% compared to a
mono-digestion reactor, which was fed with kitchen waste under
mesophilic condition. In addition, the stabilizing effect of Fe-rich
seeding sludge was reported in the same study with relatively
more effective start-up process. Its volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration also never exceeded 500 mg COD L1, unlike the control
reactor which had failed to perform the digestion at the end.
ing the acetate utilization rate, Ni stimulation has also been found
to have a connection with the predominance of a genus Methanosarcina (Speece et al., 1983). The conclusion of Munk and Lebuhn
(2014) is also in agreement with this statement in which they discovered that the microbial population in a Ni-supplemented
(0.12 mg Ni kg1fresh matter) fermenter with maize feeding had
shifted dominance to Methanosarcina sp. Similar finding has been
reported by Yu et al. (2015a) by using Fe salt instead. This phenomena is obviously beneficial because the community of Methanosarcina sp. is a versatile and it is the key methanogen in the anaerobic
digestion system. It can undergo both methanogenesis pathways
with high tolerance to different stressful living surroundings such
as high level of ammonium (up to 7000 mg L1), and sodium (up to
18,000 mg L1) compared to other species of methanogens (De
Vrieze et al., 2012).
In terms of digestion performance, the presence of Ni can stimulate the degradation rate of acetate (Speece et al., 1983). On the
other hand, Ni alone probably may not significantly improve the
total biogas production, but the supplement of 0.1 mg Ni L1 successfully increased the methane yield by 27% in a maize silagefed batch reactor (Evranos and Demirel, 2015). This achievement
is strongly pursuited for improving the quality of the generated
biogas with a higher calorific value which depends on methane
content. Besides the increased methane generation, the continuous
addition of Ni (0.5 lM) into a methanol-fed upflow anaerobic
sludge bed (UASB) immediately solved the VFA accumulation
problem in the bioreactor and hence, recovered the methanol
degradation up to 99% (Fermoso et al., 2008).
3.3. Cobalt (Co)
Jarvis et al. (1997) reported that Co at a concentration of
0.02 mg L1 was required in order to maintain a stable and efficient
anaerobic digestion performance of grass-clover silage. Apart from
improving the methane production and the acetate degradation
rate (<0.05 g CH3COO L1after Co addition), Co-additive also
allowed a higher reactor working capacity, which was up to
7.0 gVS L1d1 compared to 5.0 gVS L1d1 of the Counsupplemented reactor. These indicated that Co is one of the crucial elements to maintain the stability of the digestion process,
while allowing higher organic loading.
On the other hand, a Co-deprived UASB fed with methanol was
found to have a low methanogenic activity during digestion and
this was probably caused by the shifting pathway of methanogenesis to methylotrophic (Zandvoort et al., 2002). The measure of the
authors to complement the bioreactor with 0.33 lM of Co managed to improve the methanol conversion efficiency of the bioreactor. A relatively higher dosage of 0.84 lM significantly increased
the methanogenic activity of intermediate acetate by maximum
of 75%. Besides stimulating the methanogenesis process, the addition of Co is believed to boost the acetogenesis at the initial stage of
anaerobic digestion (Boonyakitsombut et al., 2002; Florencio et al.,
1993). This is because Co is one of the growing factors of acetogens
(Ljungdahl, 1986). Not forgetting, (sub)optimal dosage is critical to
avoid the accumulation of acetate, which will constrain the overall
anaerobic digestion process (Paulo et al., 2004). From the toxicity
point of view, the concentration of 70 mg L1 free Co and
280 mg L1 of total soluble Co or higher will completely inhibit
the process of methanogenesis (Bhattacharya et al., 1995).
3.4. Influential factor that causes the impacts variation
373
Substrate
Operation mode
and condition
Additive
concentration
Unit
Fe
Acetate
CSTR
OLR: 0.6 g/L day
Batch, 37 C
CSTR
OLR: 0.6 g/L day
Batch, 37 C
Batch, 37 C
Batch, 37 C
1.0a/
1.060b
100
0.1/
0.201a,b
100
100
0.1
mg L1
5
0.1a/
0.154b
100
100
0.1
mg L1
mg L1
Food wastec
Food wasted
Maize silage
Batch, 37 C
CSTR
OLR: 0.6 g/L day
Batch, 37 C
Batch, 37 C
Batch, 37 C
Food waste
Food wastec
Food wasted
Maize silage
Batch,
Batch,
Batch,
Batch,
37 C
37 C
37 C
37 C
1
6
6
0.05
mg L1
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
mg L1
Food
Food
Food
Food
Food
Batch,
Batch,
Batch,
Batch,
Batch,
37 C
37 C
37 C
37 C
37 C
5
10
10
10
10
mg L1
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
Ni
Food waste
Acetate
Food wastec
Food wasted
Maize silage
Co
Mo
Se
W
Food waste
Acetate
waste
wastec
wasted
wastec
wasted
1
mg L
mg L1
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
mg L1
mg kg1TSin
mg kg1TSin
mg L1
Parameter
Impact (%)
References
AUR
VSS
Methane yield
AUR
VSS
SMP
SMP
TS removal
VS removal
Methane yield
AUR
VSS
SMP
SMP
TS removal
VS removal
Methane yield
SMP
SMP
TS removal
VS removal
Methane yield
SMP
SMP
SMP
SMP
+3822
+1390
+11.3
+2011
+352
+15.4
6.22
+0.2
+0.5
+14.0
+462
+258
+11.2
7.14
No impact
+0.7
+12.4
+42.9
0.230
0.4
3.6
+11.6
+27.2
9.45
+10.7
20.3
Note: +: higher; : lower by finding comparison of trace element supplemented and unsupplemented/control system.
AUR: acetate utilization rate; TS: total solids; VS: volatile solids; VSS: volatile suspended solids; SMP: specific methane production; CSTR: continuous stirred tank reactor;
OLR: organic loading rate.
a
Minimum requirement to support capacity 30 g L1d1 AUR at 5-day solid/hydraulic retention time.
b
Corrected concentration by taking account of contamination.
c
Inoculated with low concentration of background trace element (mg kg1TS): Ni: 24.2; Co: 2.9; Mo: 4.0; Se: <1.0; W: 2.7.
d
Inoculated with high concentration of background trace element (mg kg1TS): Ni: 47.0; Co: 7.4; Mo: 15.9; Se: 9.1; W: 5.2.
table, all the supplemented trace elements except Mo, have positive impacts on the acetate degradation rate, methane generation
and solid destruction. In a study by Evranos and Demirel (2015),
Mo addition had been demonstrated to have a negative impact
on solid removal, but a higher methane production was observed
at the end of digestion. Obviously, there is a great variation of
impact levels caused by different single trace elements on the
anaerobic digestion performance, and this situation can be
explained by some reasons and factors.
First and foremost, the type of digestion substrates. The simpler
substrate, i.e. acetate in the study of Takashima and Speece (1989)
will have a greater response on the trace element supplementation
compared to the substrate which has a complex matrix (maize
silage; Evranos and Demirel, 2015). Despite the studied parameters, additive concentration and operation mode were different,
the obvious significant differences of the impact levels are sufficient to support this statement.
The factor of trace element background level clearly influences
the impact of supplementation. This can be observed from the findings of Facchin et al. (2013), where the high-trace-element-level
inoculated food waste had a negative impact on the methane production and vice versa (Table 4). Therefore, it is critical to identify
and study the trace elements background level of substrates before
supplementing the trace element to avoid overdosing and deterioration of digestion performance (Plugge et al., 2009). For this, the
regional estimation of the element concentration of substrates will
be desirable, yet this would be infeasible. This is because there was
a high regional variation without a traceable trend in the level of
certain micronutrients by analyzing 1500 samples from different
digesters (Lindorfer et al., 2012).
Moreover, the impact of trace element is believed to be affected
by the operating temperature, typically mesophilic and
374
Table 5
Impacts of multiple trace elements supplementation on anaerobic digestion process.
Substrate
Operation
mode and
temperature
Operation
condition
Trace element
and added
concentration
Unit
Findings
References
Food waste
Semicontinuous,
300 mL digester,
37 C
OLR:
2 gVS L1 d1
HRT: 30 days
Fe: 100
Co: 1
Ni, Mo: 5
mg L1
Zhang
et al.
(2015b)
OLR:
4 gVS L1 d1
HRT: 20 days
OLR:
6 gVS L1 d1
HRT: 15 days
&
Continuous,
12 L CSTR,
55 C
OLR:
6.8 kgCOD m3d1
Fe: 10
Co, Ni: 1
mg L1
Qiang et al.
(2013)
Food waste
Semicontinuous,
4.5 L digester,
37 C
OLR:
1.0 to
3.0 gVSL1d1
Fe: 5
Co, Ni: 1
mg L1
SMP +5.1%
Zhang
et al.
(2015a)
&
OLR:
4.0 gVS L1 d1
&
Continuous,
7 L CSTR,
37 C
OLR:
5.5 gVS L1 d1
Fe: 5
Co, Ni: 1
Se: 0.2
OLR:
2.5 kgVS m3d1
Trace element
solution:
Ni, Co, Cu, Mn, Zn,
Mo, Se, B
n.a.
8 L CSTR,
39 C
OLR:
3.0 kgVS m3d1
OLR:
3.3 kgVS m3d1
&
&
&
Trace element
solution:
Fe, Co, Ni, Se, W
n.a.
Ortner
et al.
(2014a)
&
SMY reduced from 340 to 170 Nm3 tCOD1 (by 50%) due to the ammonia inhibition.
Total VFA <3500 mg L1
&
&
&
OLR:
1.8 kgVS m3d1
NH3-N:
8.5 g kg1
&
Nordell
et al.
(2016)
375
376
Table 5 (continued)
Substrate
Operation
mode and
temperature
Operation
condition
Trace element
and added
concentration
Unit
Grass silage
Semicontinuous,
4 L CSTR,
37 C
OLR:
4.0 kgVS m3d1
HRT:
19 days
Fe: 74.4
Co: 0.13
Ni: 2.48
mg L1
Semicontinuous,
4.5 L digester,
37 C
Stop feeding
Trace element
solution:
Fe, Ni, Co
n.a.
Food waste
Findings
Wall et al.
(2014)
&
&
Total VFA reduced from 30,470 to 2260 mg L1 (by 92.6%) within 2 weeks
Wei et al.
(2014)
&
Stop feeding
Trace element
solution:
Co, Ni, Se, W
&
Accumulation of total VFA is much more less than (91.3%) the control reactor, which
was solely supplied with Fe
&
&
mg L1
&
1
&
&
VFA accumulated once the OLR increased at the 96th day, yet the concentration of VFA
had decreased afterwards, which was at 148th day by 25%
Methane yield slightly improved from 439 to 446 mL CH4 gVS1
added (by 1.59 %)
n.a.
Restarted with
OLR:
1.5 kgVS m3d1
Food waste with high ammonia
concentration (56.1 gNH3H L1)
Semicontinuous,
4 L digester,
36 C
OLR:
3 to 4 gVS L1 d1
Multi-element
supplementation
stopped
Se: 0.03
Food waste
Semicontinuous,
150 mL digester,
36 C
OLR:
5 gVS L1 d1
Se: 0.2
Co, Ni: 1.0
mg L
OLR:
2.2 to
2.3 gVS L1 d1
Co: 2.0
Mo: 5.0
Ni: 10.0
Fe: 100
mg L1
&
OLR:
3.6 to
4.5 gVS L1 d1
&
The insignificant increases of OLR did not accumulate VFA yet it reduced from 597 to
471 mg L1 (by 21.1 %)
OLR:
6.6 gVS L1 d1
&
Drastic waste loading caused the increasing of VFA (615 mg L1) but it was maintained
at a low level which is below 960 mg L1.
Slight deterioration of methane yield by 8.33%
&
Semicontinuous,
8.5 L CSTR,
38 C
OLR:
4.0 gVS L1
(3.25 OFMSW
+ 0.75 SW)
Co: 0.5
Fe: 400
mg L1
&
&
&
Co: 0.5
Fe: 400
Ni: 0.5
mg L
1
&
&
Additional of Co surprisingly caused a higher VFA accumulation with 7 g L1, compared to the control reactor, which only supplemented with Fe with VFA concentration 23 g L1
Increasing of VFA followed with a lower rate of biogas production
Lower alkalinity (10.8%) compared to control reactor.
Bayr et al.
(2012)
Banks et al.
(2012)
Zhang and
Jahng,
2012
Moestedt
et al.
(2016)
Note: +: higher; : lower by finding comparison of trace elements supplemented and unsupplemented/control system.
n.a: not applicable; OLR: organic loading rate; HRT: hydraulic retention day; VS: volatile solids; VSS: volatile suspended solids; (S)COD: (soluble) chemical oxygen demand; VFA: volatile fatty acid; SMY: specific methane yield;
SMP: specific methane production; VMPR: volumetric methane production rate; CSTR: continuous stirred tank reactor.
Semicontinuous,
10 L CSTR,
35 C
&
&
Restarted with
OLR:
4.0 gVS L1 d1
Swine slaughterhouse waste
References
377
6. Research outlook
The global effort to strengthen the energy security requires the
support of the relevant scientific researches. Same goes to the
anaerobic digestion, in order to further mature this promising
renewable energy production technology. In this paper, the aspect
of trace elements is discussed and regarded. The role of trace elements in anaerobic digestion had been well understood for the
stages of acetogenesis and methanogenesis, but not for the hydrolysis and acidogenesis process. For fundamental understanding, the
possible regulatory factors that would alter the trace elements
requirement are urged to be investigated. Not forgetting, the interactive relationships between/among the trace elements within the
anaerobic digestion system are required to be evaluated as well.
There is a great challenge to determine a discrete range of trace
elements requirement for the anaerobic digestion process which
involved the complex substrates. One of the reasons is the great
divergence of the background concentration of trace elements content. Therefore, the trace elements bioavailability of the substrates
must be characterized and assessed, especially for the trace elements supplementation study. Only then, the findings such as
the (sub)optimum dosage can be referred and applicable for the
other different substrates. Yet, the anaerobic digestion feedstocks
have not been emphasized for their trace elements bioavailability
compared to the environmental samples for the toxicity
assessment.
There are many researches had been carried out which aimed to
achieve better performance of anaerobic digestion, such as by the
strategies of pretreatment, co-digestion and bioreactor modification. However, these studies had been discussed by focusing on
the well known factors (i.e. biodegradability, C/N ratio, biomass
retention, etc.). Thus, the consideration of trace elements bioavailability in the anaerobic digestion studies is definitely a research
breakthrough. For this, the sequential extraction scheme is crucial
to be uniform and improved. The scheme will be favoured when it
can be easier to partition the representative and relevant metal
fractions with high recovery, but requires low cost and less time.
7. Conclusions
The measure of trace elements supplementation is effective to
improve the performance of anaerobic digestion process by applying necessary (sub)optimum dosage. The positive impacts include
the longer term digester stability with greater organic matter
degradation, low VFA level, and higher biogas production. However, these impacts are uncertain, but can be affected by many factors. Fe, Ni, and Co are the most desirable trace elements. Single
and multiple trace element(s) addition have presented the overlapping positive impacts, but with a greater level by the latter one.
The future researches should be carried out with the consideration
of trace elements bioavailability.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Universiti Sains Malaysias
Research University Individual (RUI) Grant (1001/PTEKIND/814239) for the financial support.
378
Jones, J.B., Stadtman, T.C., 1977. Methanococcus vannielii: culture and effects of
selenium and tungsten on growth. J. Bacteriol. 130, 14041406.
Jones, W.J., Paynter, M.J.B., Gupta, R., 1983. Characterization of Methanococcus
maripaludis sp. nov., a new methanogen isolated from salt marsh sediment.
Arch. Microbiol. 135, 9197.
Kim, M., Gomec, C.Y., Ahn, Y., Speece, R.E., 2003. Hydrolysis and acidogenesis of
particulate organic material in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic
digestion. Environ. Technol. 24, 11831190.
Lin, D., Kakinozo, T., Nishio, N., Nagai, S., 1990. Enhanced cytochrome formation and
stimulate methanogenesis rate by the increased ferrous concentrations in
Methanosarcina barkeri culture. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 68, 8992.
Lindorfer, H., Ramhold, D., Frauz, B., 2012. Nutrient and trace element supply in
anaerobic digestion plants and effect of trace element application. Water Sci.
Technol. 66, 19231929.
Ljungdahl, L.G., 1986. The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic
bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 415450
Mara, D., Horan, N., Anderson, K., Sallis, P., Uyanik, S., 2003. Handbook of Water and
Wastewater Microbiology. Elsevier, Handbook of Water and Wastewater
Microbiology.
Meng, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Quan, X., 2013. Adding Fe0 powder to enhance the
anaerobic conversion of propionate to acetate. Biochem. Eng. J. 73, 8085.
Moestedt, J., Nordell, E., Shakeri Yekta, S., Lundgren, J., Mart, M., Sundberg, C.,
Ejlertsson, J., Svensson, B.H., Bjrn, A., 2016. Effects of trace element addition on
process stability during anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW and slaughterhouse
waste. Waste Manage. 47, 1120.
Munk, B., Lebuhn, M., 2014. Process diagnosis using methanogenic Archaea in
maize-fed, trace element depleted fermenters. Anaerobe 29, 2228.
Nordell, E., Nilsson, B., Nilsson Pledal, S., Karisalmi, K., Moestedt, J., 2016. Codigestion of manure and industrial waste The effects of trace element
addition. Waste Manage. 47, 2127.
Ortner, M., Leitzinger, K., Skupien, S., Bochmann, G., Fuchs, W., 2014a. Efficient
anaerobic mono-digestion of N-rich slaughterhouse waste: influence of
ammonia, temperature and trace elements. Bioresour. Technol. 174, 222232.
Ortner, M., Rachbauer, L., Somitsch, W., Fuchs, W., 2014b. Can bioavailability of
trace nutrients be measured in anaerobic digestion? Appl. Energy 126, 190198.
Ortner, M., Rameder, M., Rachbauer, L., Bochmann, G., Fuchs, W., 2015.
Bioavailability of essential trace elements and their impact on anaerobic
digestion of slaughterhouse waste. Biochem. Eng. J. 99, 107113.
Osuna, M.B., Iza, J., Zandvoort, M., Lens, P.N.L., 2003a. Essential metal depletion in an
anaerobic reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 48, 18.
Osuna, M.B., Zandvoort, M.H., Iza, J.M., Lettinga, G., Lens, P.N.L., 2003b. Effects of
trace element addition on volatile fatty acid conversions in anaerobic granular
sludge reactors. Environ. Technol. 24, 573587.
Park, C.M., Novak, J.T., 2013. The effect of direct addition of iron(III) on anaerobic
digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Sci. Technol. 68, 2391
2396.
Patidar, S.K., Tare, V., 2004. Effect of micro-nutrients in anaerobic degradation of
sulfate laden organics. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 31, 420431.
Paulo, P.L., Jiang, B., Cysneiros, D., Stams, A.J.M., Lettinga, G., 2004. Effect of cobalt on the
anaerobic thermophilic conversion of methanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85, 434441.
Plugge, C.M., Jiang, B., De Bok, F.A.M., Tsai, C., Stams, A.J.M., 2009. Effect of
tungsten and molybdenum on growth of a syntrophic coculture of
Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Methanospirillum hungatei. Arch. Microbiol.
191, 5561.
Pobeheim, H., Munk, B., Johansson, J., Guebitz, G.M., 2010. Influence of trace
elements on methane formation from a synthetic model substrate for maize
silage. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 836839.
Qiang, H., Niu, Q., Chi, Y., Li, Y., 2013. Trace metals requirements for continuous
thermophilic methane fermentation of high-solid food waste. Chem. Eng. J. 222,
330336.
Scherer, P., Lippert, H., Wolff, G., 1983. Composition of the major elements and trace
elements of 10 methanogenic bacteria determined by inductively coupled
plasma emission spectrometry. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 5, 149163.
Scherer, P., Sahm, H., 1981. Effect of trace elements and vitamins on the growth of
Methanosarcina barkeri. Acta Biotechnol. 1, 5765.
Schmidt, T., Nelles, M., Scholwin, F., Prter, J., 2014. Trace element supplementation
in the biogas production from wheat stillage Optimization of metal dosing.
Bioresour. Technol. 168, 8085.
Schnheit, P., Moll, J., Thauer, R.K., 1979. Nickel, cobalt, and molybdenum
requirement for growth of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch.
Microbiol. 123, 105107.
Shakeri Yekta, S., Skyllberg, U., Danielsson, ., Bjrn, A., Svensson, B.H., 2016.
Chemical speciation of sulfur and metals in biogas reactorsImplications for
cobalt and nickel bio-uptake processes. J. Hazard. Mater. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.058.
Shima, S., Warkentin, E., Thauer, R.K., Ermler, U., 2002. Structure and function of
enzymes involved in the methanogenic pathway utilizing carbon dioxide and
molecular hydrogen. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 93, 519530.
Speece, R.E., Parkin, G.F., Gallagher, D., 1983. Nickel stimulation of anaerobic
digestion. Water Res. 17, 677683.
Takashima, M., Shimada, K., Speece, R.E., 2011. Minimum requirements for trace
metals (iron, nickel, cobalt, and zinc) in thermophilic and mesophilic methane
fermentation from glucose. Water Environ. Res. 83, 339346.
Takashima, M., Speece, R.E., 1989. Mineral nutrient requirements for high-rate
methane fermentation of acetate at low SRT. Res. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.
61, 16451650.
379
of waste activated sludge with the addition of ferric salts. Bioresour. Technol.
179, 291298.
Yu, B., Shan, A., Zhang, D., Lou, Z., Yuan, H., Huang, X., Zhu, N., Hu, X., 2015b. Dosing
time of ferric chloride to disinhibit the excessive volatile fatty acids in
sludge thermophilic anaerobic digestion system. Bioresour. Technol. 189,
154161.
Zandvoort, M.H., Geerts, R., Lettinga, G., Lens, P.N.L., 2002. Effect of long-term cobalt
deprivation on methanol degradation in a methanogenic granular sludge
bioreactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 18, 12331239.
Zandvoort, M.H., van Hullebusch, E.D., Fermoso, F.G., Lens, P.N.L., 2006. Trace metals
in anaerobic granular sludge reactors: bioavailability and dosing strategies. Eng.
Life Sci. 6, 293301.
Zhang, L., Jahng, D., 2012. Long-term anaerobic digestion of food waste stabilized by
trace elements. Waste Manage. 32, 15091515.
Zhang, L., Lee, Y.W., Jahng, D., 2011. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and
piggery wastewater: focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresour. Technol.
102, 50485059.
Zhang, W., Wu, S., Guo, J., Zhou, J., Dong, R., 2015a. Performance and kinetic
evaluation of semi-continuously fed anaerobic digesters treating food waste:
role of trace elements. Bioresour. Technol. 178, 297305.
Zhang, W., Zhang, L., Li, A., 2015b. Enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste by
trace metal elements supplementation and reduced metals dosage by green
chelating agent [S,S]-EDDS via improving metals bioavailability. Water Res. 84,
266277.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Suzuki, K., Maekawa, T., 2003. Uptake and mass balance of trace
metals for methane producing bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 25, 427433.