Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Mr. Rutland is attempting to take his project (the NJHF) from a small-localized
organization to a nationally recognized organization. His plan has changed
because his original project involved restoring the historic Paramount Theatre,
and he envisioned a project where he would incorporate the restoration of this
building with the founding of the National Jazz Hall of Fame. The original plan
would have seen the restored Paramount included in a revitalized downtown
district where the restored theatre would be reborn as a museum and
performance center while paying homage to the historic New York City jazz hall
of the 30s. Unfortunately, as is common in many projects, he discovered once
he had embarked on his plan that it was not all going to work as seamlessly as
he had previously envisioned and they had to drop the restoration plan of the
historic theatre from their project. In the end, I think he made a good choice, as
the other project would have been exorbitantly expensive and could have risked
causing the whole project to fail.
2. This case study had an interesting assortment of stakeholders. The primary
stakeholders are the board of directors of the NJHF. Mr. Rutland displays in the
closing paragraph of the story that he is not sure how to present this information
to the board. I also think that potential visitors to the museum, performance
center, exhibition hall are stakeholders because they are the revenue stream for
the organization. Because of this fact, their views or thoughts concerning format
changes is vital. If anything occurs that alienates them from the NJHF, the flow
of funds could slow down and they close down. A little farther down the
reasoning ladder, I also think that fans of jazz are stakeholders because the NJHF
represents them as the relevant subject matter expert on this genre of music.
Although they might not be direct contributors of money, I think that their
opinion matters. If they happen to take offense with something that the
organization does, they could cause the reputation of the organization to be
tarnished, which could discredit their stature.
3. The first essential skill of a project manager from this chapter of the book would
be acquiring adequate resources. This is an especially applicable one because
the organization is starting with such a small amount of money to work with, and
they need at least ten times what they have on hand to really get the
organization off to a good start. Another PM skill presented in the chapter is
dealing with obstacles. Not having enough money on-hand to complete the next
step that you need to take is another good example of dealing with obstacles.
Another skill highlighted in the story is making project goal trade-offs. Mr.
Rutland originally set out to save a historic building and create the NJHF
simultaneously, but learned that was not going to be feasible. He made the
decision that it was better to press forward with creating and building the
organization rather than letting the overambitious project cause the organization
to fail. I would say that this past example is also an example of maintaining a
balanced outlook. He did not get everything that he wanted, but he was still able
to achieve part of his original plan. Breadth of Communication is the final skill
required, as Mr. Rutland will have to communicate all of the information he has
gathered with his board of directors so that they can all make an informed
decision about the proper course of action for the organization.
4. The two types of credibility listed in Project Management: A Managerial
Approach (2012) is technical credibility and administrative credibility. Mr.
Rutland possesses a limited amount of technical credibility. He is a jazz
enthusiast and recognized as the founder of the NJHF. The rest of the board is